Search

Objectives To determine an US scanning protocol with the best accuracy for the diagnosis of gout and CPPD in patients with acute mono/oligo-arthritis of unknown origin. Methods Patients with acute mono/oligo-arthritis in whom a joint aspiration at the most clinically involved joint (target joint) was requested were consecutively enrolled. US was performed in each patient before the arthrocentesis. The accuracy of different US findings and scanning protocols for the diagnosis of gout and CPPD was calculated. Results A total of 161 subjects were included (32 gout patients, 30 CPPD patients and 99 disease-controls). US findings had a high specificity for gout (0.92–0.96) and CPPD (0.90–0.97), while the sensitivity ranged from 0.73 to 0.85 in gout (double contour sign and tophi, respectively) and from 0.60 to 0.90 in CPPD (hyaline and fibrocartilage deposits, respectively). The US assessment of two joints bilaterally (gout: knees, MTP1 joints; CPPD: knees, wrists) plus the target joint had an excellent diagnostic sensitivity (gout: 0.91, CPPD: 0.93) and specificity (gout: 0.91, CPPD: 0.89). This targeted US scanning protocol yielded to higher diagnostic accuracy compared with the US evaluation of the target joint [gout area under the curve (AUC) 0.91 vs 0.84, P  = 0.03; CPPD AUC 0.93 vs 0.84, P  = 0.04] unless the target joint was the knee or the MTP1 joint in gout and the knee or the wrist in CPPD. Conclusions A targeted US scanning protocol of two joints bilaterally plus the target joint showed an excellent accuracy (>90%) for the diagnosis of crystal arthritis in patients with acute mono/oligoarthritis.   A video abstract is available for this article and can be viewed at https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac479. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To investigate the reliability of the OMERACT US Task Force definition of US enthesitis in SpA. Methods In this web exercise, based on the evaluation of 101 images and 39 clips of the main entheses of the lower limbs, the elementary components included in the OMERACT definition of US enthesitis in SpA (hypoechoic areas, entheseal thickening, power Doppler signal at the enthesis, enthesophytes/calcifications, bone erosions) were assessed by 47 rheumatologists from 37 rheumatology centres in 15 countries. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the US components of enthesitis was calculated using Light's kappa, Cohen's kappa, Prevalence And Bias Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) and their 95% CIs. Results Bone erosions and power Doppler signal at the enthesis showed the highest overall inter-reliability [Light's kappa: 0.77 (0.76–0.78), 0.72 (0.71–0.73), respectively; PABAK: 0.86 (0.86–0.87), 0.73 (0.73–0.74), respectively], followed by enthesophytes/calcifications [Light's kappa: 0.65 (0.64–0.65), PABAK: 0.67 (0.67–0.68)]. This was moderate for entheseal thickening [Light's kappa: 0.41 (0.41–0.42), PABAK: 0.41 (0.40–0.42)], and fair for hypoechoic areas [Light's kappa: 0.37 (0.36–0.38); PABAK: 0.37 (0.37–0.38)]. A similar trend was observed in the intra-reliability exercise, although this was characterized by an overall higher degree of reliability for all US elementary components compared with the inter-observer evaluation. Conclusions The results of this multicentre, international, web-based study show a good reliability of the OMERACT US definition of bone erosions, power Doppler signal at the enthesis and enthesophytes/calcifications. The low reliability of entheseal thickening and hypoechoic areas raises questions about the opportunity to revise the definition of these two major components for the US diagnosis of enthesitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To explore the spectrum of articular and peri-articular ultrasound (US) findings at metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints in calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) deposition disease (CPPD). Methods Consecutive CPPD patients (chronic CPP crystal inflammatory arthritis or OA with CPPD), and age- and sex-matched controls with RA were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent bilateral US examination of MCP joints. CPP deposits, synovial inflammation, osteophytes, cartilage damage and bone erosions were recorded. Results Sixty CPPD patients (33, 55.0% with OA with CPPD and 27, 45.0% with chronic CPP crystal inflammatory arthritis) and 40 RA patients were enrolled. CPP deposits were detected in 24 (40.0%) CPPD patients and in 3 (7.5%) RA patients (P  <0.01). In CPPD patients, different types of CPP deposits were identified at MCP joints: 17 (28.3%) patients had dorsal capsuloligamentous deposits, 14 (23.3%) intra-cartilaginous deposits, 13 (21.7%) lateral capsuloligamentous deposits, 12 (20.0%) intra-articular deposits, eight (13.3%) double contour sign and five (8.3%) flexor digitorum tendons' deposits. CPPD patients with chronic CPP crystal inflammatory arthritis showed more US findings indicating synovial inflammation and CPP deposits than those with OA with CPPD. Conversely, a higher prevalence of US features indicating structural damage was noted in this latter phenotype. CPP deposits and bone erosions were the US findings with the highest value for diagnosing chronic CPP crystal inflammatory arthritis and RA, respectively. Conclusion This study provides pictorial evidence of the broad spectrum of US findings indicating CPP deposits at MCP joints in CPPD. Furthermore, we reported different US patterns in different CPPD phenotypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To measure with US the intima-media thickness (IMT) of temporal (superficial, parietal and frontal branches) and axillary arteries in subjects without a diagnosis of GCA and/or PMR with different cardiovascular (CV) risk; and to assess the performance of previously proposed cut-off values for normal IMT. Methods Subjects ≥ 50 years without a diagnosis of GCA or PMR were included. Bilateral US of the temporal arteries, including the frontal and parietal branches, and axillary arteries was performed by two sonographers using a 10–22 MHz and 6–18 MHz probe. The following previously proposed cut-offs were considered: superficial temporal artery: 0.42 mm; frontal branch: 0.34 mm; parietal branch: 0.29 mm; axillary artery: 1.0 mm. Results A total of 808 arteries in 101 subjects were evaluated; of these, 31 (30.7%) were classified as very high CV risk, seven (6.9%) as high, 34 (33.7%) as moderate and 29 (28.7%) as low risk. Subjects with very high or high risk showed higher IMT than those with moderate or low risk in the superficial temporal arteries [0.23 (s. d. 0.07) vs 0.20 (s. d. 0.04), P < 0.01] and in the axillary arteries [0.54 (s. d. 0.17) vs 0.48 (s. d. 0.10), P = 0.002]. The IMT was higher than the reference cut-off in 13/808 (1.6%) arteries, in ≥1 artery in 10/101 subjects (10.1%). Of these 10 subjects, 8 (80%) were classified as having very high or high risk. Conclusion Our results suggest that CV risk might influence the US-determined IMT of the temporal and axillary arteries in subjects without GCA. Therefore, in patients with suspected GCA, particular attention should be paid when measuring the IMT in those patients with very high/high CV risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To establish optimal cut-off values for the scores of the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), the modified Fibromialgia Assessment Scale (FAS 2019mod), and the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale (PDS) in order to distinguish five levels of FM disease severity. Methods Consecutive FM patients were evaluated with the three clinimetric indices, and each patient was required to answer the anchor question: 'In general, would you say your health is 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor, or 5 = very poor?'—which represented the external criterion. Cut-off points were established through the interquartile reconciliation approach. Results The study sample consisted of 2181 women (93.2%) and 158 men (6.8%), with a mean age of 51.9 (11.5) years, and mean disease duration was 7.3 (6.9) years. The overall median FIQR, FAS 2019 mod and PDS scores (25th–75th percentiles) were respectively 61.16 (41.16–77.00), 27.00 (19.00–32.00) and 19.0 (13.00–24.00). Reconciliation of the mean 75th and 25th percentiles of adjacent categories defined the severity states for FIQR: 0–23 for remission, 24–40 for mild disease, 41–63 for moderate disease, 64–82 for severe disease and >83 for very severe disease; FAS 2019 mod: 0–12 for remission, 13–20 for mild disease, 21–28 for moderate disease, 29–33 for severe disease and >33 for very severe disease; PDS: 0–5 for remission, 6–15 for mild disease, 16–20 for moderate disease, 21–25 for severe disease and >25 for very severe disease. Conclusions Disease severity cut-offs can represent an important improvement in interpreting FM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Various studies have shown that overweight and obesity are central features of FM, but the real impact of a high BMI on clinical severity in patients with FM is still controversial. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationships between BMI categories and measures of symptom severity and functional impairment using data from a Web-based registry of patients with FM. Methods Adult patients with an ACR 2010/2011 diagnosis of FM underwent a complete physical examination and laboratory tests and were asked to complete a package of questionnaires covering their sociodemographic and treatment details, in addition to the following disease-specific questionnaires: the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status questionnaire (ModFAS) and the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale (PDS). Results A total of 2339 patients were recruited and divided into two weight categories, underweight/normal (U/N, n  = 1127, 48.2%) and overweight/obese (O/O, n  = 1212, 51.8%). The total and subscales of FIQR, ModFAS and PSD scores were significantly higher in the O/O patients, as were all the mean scores of the individual FIQR items (P  < 0.001 for all). Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that O/O patients with FM are significantly more impaired than U/N patients in all the symptomatological and functional domains as measured using the FIQR, ModFAS and PDS, thus suggesting that being O/O has an additional effect on symptoms and function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To compare the concordance of the three diagnostic criteria, respectively the 2011 ACR criteria (ACR 2011 Cr), the ACR 2016 criteria (ACR 2016 Cr) and the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations Innovations Opportunities and Networks (ACTTION)-APS Pain Taxonomy criteria (AAPT Cr), and to explore the performance of an additional set of criteria, the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status (FAS 2019 modCr), in the diagnosis of FM syndrome. Methods Consecutive patients with chronic widespread pain, referred by the primary care setting, underwent rheumatologic assessment that established the presence or not of FM and were investigated through the four sets of proposed criteria. For the FAS 2019 modCr, discriminant validity to distinguish patients with FM and non-FM was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results A total of 732 (405 with FM and 327 with other common chronic pain problems) patients were evaluated. Against the clinical diagnosis of FM, the sensitivity, specificity and correct classification were, respectively: 79.8, 91.7 and 85.1% for ACR 2011 Cr; 78, 90.5 and 83.6% for the ACR 2016 Cr; and 73.8, 91.7 and 81.8% for the AAPT Cr. The alternative set, proposed on the FAS 2019 modCr, provided a maximal diagnostic accuracy with a score ≥20 (Youden's index), with a sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity 89.0% and positive likelihood ratio 7.65. Conclusion There is a considerable agreement between criteria-based diagnoses of FM, although the AAPT Cr perform least well in terms of percentage of correct classification. The FAS 2019 modCr had comparable characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Some case reports and small case series of patients with silicone breast implant (SBI) have reported the development of systemic sclerosis (SSc) many years later, despite conflicting evidence of this association in the literature. Recently, patients with SSc and anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies positivity have been associated with previous silicone implants and/or breast cancer, showing clinical features that differ from the classic SSc, such as rapid and diffuse cutaneous involvement and scleroderma renal crisis (SRC). The specific autoimmune reaction is not yet fully understood, although knowledge in this regard is increasing. We describe a case that can support these previous observations, strengthening this association which must be taken into account. Clinicians should be aware of this new clinical entity, given the widespread use of silicone implants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses research which investigated prevalence and distribution of metacarpal head cartilage damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and hand osteoarthritis (OA). Topics explored include the clinical characteristics and manifestation of RA and OA, results of the image acquisition and radiographic examination performed, and the observed link between cartilage damage, patient's age, and disease duration.

Objective: The aims of this cross-sectional study were to investigate the usefulness of using an Internet survey of patients with fibromyalgia in order to obtain information concerning symptoms and functionality and identify clusters of clinical features that can distinguish patient subsets. Methods: An Internet website has been used to collect data. Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised version, self-administered Fibromyalgia Activity Score, and Self-Administered Pain Scale were used as questionnaires. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering was applied to the data obtained in order to identify symptoms and functional-based subgroups. Results: Three hundred and fifty-three patients completed the study (85.3% women). The highest scored items were those related to sleep quality, fatigue/energy, pain, stiffness, degree of tenderness, balance problems, and environmental sensitivity. A high proportion of patients reported pain in the neck (81.4%), upper back (70.1%), and lower back (83.2%). A three-cluster solution best fitted the data. The variables were significantly different (P,0.0001) among the three clusters: cluster 1 (117 patients) reflected the lowest average scores across all symptoms, cluster 3 (116 patients) the highest scores, and cluster 2 (120 patients) captured moderate symptom levels, with low depression and anxiety. Conclusion: Three subgroups of fibromyalgia samples in a large cohort of patients have been identified by using an Internet survey. This approach could provide rationale to support the study of individualized clinical evaluation and may be used to identify optimal treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a reply to comments on the article comparing different sets of diagnostic/classification criteria for fibromyalgia (FM). Topics discussed include their non-specific listing of diseases as pain conditions in FM diagnosis is long, and the exclusion of non-FGF23-dependent phosphorus diabetes, and hypophosphataemia. Also noted are the complex conditions characterized by widespread chronic pain.