Search

Background: Precision medicine is based on molecular and genotypic patient characterization to define specific target treatment. BRAF mutation is an oncogenic driver, and the Cancer Genome Atlas has identified BRAF mutations in different cancer types. Tumor type agnostic therapy is based on targeting genomic alterations, regardless of tumor origin. In this context, novel therapeutic agents including BRAF and MEK inhibitors based on the molecular landscape in solid tumors have been investigated. Case presentation, Case 1: The first case is chemotherapy-refractory, BRAF V600E mutated intrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma treated with vemurafenib and cobimetinib as third line therapy. In this setting the dual BRAF and MEK inhibition resulted in improved progression-free survival and quality of life; Case 2: The second case shows aBRAF G466A mutated Bellini duct carcinoma (BDC), treated with dabrafenib and trametinib in second line therapy. The disease remained under control for 11 months after the first relapse. Discussion: In the literature there is strong evidence that melanoma, colorectal cancer, non small cell lung cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer with BRAF mutations are good targets for BRAF/MEK pathway inhibitors. The VE-BASKET and ROAR basket trials explored the efficacy of vemurafenib and the combination of dabrafenib/trametinib, respectively, in BRAF V600 mutation-positive cancers other than melanoma, papillary thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer and non small cell lung cancer. Within the concept of tumor type agnostic therapy, we decided to treat our BRAF-mutated tumors with the association of BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Conclusions: Our results confirm the emerging importance of molecular tumor profiling for the successful management of cancer, and the potential of BRAF-targeted therapy in the treatment of rare solid tumors with poor prognosis and no clinical benefit from systemic therapies with.

A key tool for monitoring breast cancer patients under neoadjuvant treatment is the identification of reliable predictive markers. Ki67 has been identified as a prognostic and predictive marker in ER-positive breast cancer. Ninety ER-positive, HER2 negative locally advanced breast cancer patients received letrozole (2.5 mg daily) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg daily) with/without Sorafenib (400 mg/bid daily) for 6 months before undergoing surgery. Ki67 expression and tumor size measured with caliber were determined at baseline, after 30 days of treatment and at the end of treatment. Patients were assigned to a clinical response category according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, both at 30 days and before surgery and further classified as high-responder and low-responder according to the median variation of Ki67 values between biopsy and 30 days and between biopsy and surgery time. The predictive role of Ki67 and its changes with regard to clinical response and survival was analyzed. No differences in terms of survival outcomes emerged between the arms of treatment, while we observed a higher percentage of women with progression or stable disease in arm with the combination containing Sorafenib (20.5% vs 7.1%, p = 0.06). Clinical complete responders experienced a greater overall variation in Ki67 when compared with partial responders and patients with progressive/stable disease (66.7% vs 30.7%, p = 0.009). High responders showed a better outcome than low responders in terms of both disease-free survival ( p = 0.009) and overall survival ( p = 0.002). ΔKi67 score evaluated between basal and residual tumor at definitive surgery showed to be highly predictive of clinical complete response, and a potential parameter to be used for predicting disease-free survival and overall survival in luminal breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant endocrine-based therapy.

Background: The mTORC1 inhibitor everolimus has been approved in combination with the aromatase inhibitor exemestane for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2&minus, ) metastatic breast cancer (HR+ mBC) progressing on prior therapy with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. To date, no predictive biomarkers of tumor sensitivity/resistance for everolimus-based treatments have been identified. We hypothesized that precocious changes in the Standardized Uptake Volume (∆SUV%), as assessed by 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucosepositron-emission tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT), may be a marker of everolimus efficacy. Methods: This was a retrospective study including 31 HR+ HER2- patients treated with everolimus and exemestane in two Italian centers between 2013 and 2018. The objective of the study was to investigate ∆SUV% as a predictive marker of everolimus antitumor efficacy. 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed at baseline and after three months of treatment. Patients were defined as long responders (LRs) if disease progression occurred at least 10 months after treatment initiation and long survivors (LSs) if death occurred later than 36 months after starting therapy. ROC analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off values of ∆SUV% to distinguish LRs from non-LRs and LSs from non-LSs. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan&ndash, Meier method. Results: The SUVmax values decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months after therapy (p = 0.003). Dynamic changes of SUVmax (Delta SUV) had a higher accuracy in discriminating long-responders from non-long-responders (AUC = 0.67, Delta SUV cut-off = 28.8%) respects to its ability to identify long survivors from no-long survivors (AUC = 0.60, Delta SUV cut-off = 53.8%). Patients were divided into groups according to the Delta SUV cut-offs and survival outcomes were evaluated: patients with a decrease of ∆SUV% &ge, 28.8% had significantly better PFS (10 months-PFS: 63.2%, 95% CI: 37.9&ndash, 80.4% and 16.7%, 95% CI: 2.7&ndash, 41.3% respectively, p = 0.005). As regard as OS, patients with ∆SUV% &ge, 53.8% had longer OS when compared to patients with ∆SUV% &lt, 53.8% (36 month-OS: 82.5% vs. 45.9% vs. p = 0.048). Conclusion: We found two precocious ∆SUV% thresholds capable of identifying HR+ HER2-mBC patients, which would achieve long-term benefit or long-term survival during everolimus-exemestane therapy. These results warrant further validation in prospective studies and should be integrated with molecular biomarkers related to tumor metabolism and mTORC1 signaling.

Introduction Reliable biomarkers of response to mTOR inhibition are yet to be identified. As mTOR is heavily implicated in cell-metabolism, we investigated the relation between BMI variation and outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients treated with everolimus. Results we found a linear correlation between everolimus exposure duration and BMI/weight decrease. Patients exhibiting >2 kg weight loss or >3% BMI decrease from baseline at the end of treatment (EOT) had a statistically significant improvement in PFS. Interestingly, a similar BMI/weight decrease within the first 8 weeks of therapy identified patients at higher risk of progression. Patients and methods we performed a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the BALLET trial who progressed during the study. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-point was the identification of other predictors of response. Conclusion A >3% weight loss at EOT is associated with better outcome in mBC patients treated with everolimus. On the contrary, a significant early weight loss represents a predictor of poor survival and could therefore be used as an early negative prognostic marker. As PI3K-inhibition also converges onto mTOR, these findings might extend to patients treated with selective PI3K inhibitors and warrant further investigation.

Purpose mTOR inhibitor everolimus is used for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). No reliable predictive biomarker of response is available. Following evidences from other solid tumors, we aimed to assess the association between treatment-associated immune system features and everolimus activity. Methods We retrospectively explored a correlation with the therapeutic activity of everolimus and tumor-associated immune pathways with ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), circulating lymphocytes, and endothelial cells (CECs) in 3 different HR+ mBC studies, including the BALLET phase IIIb study. Results The circulating levels of CD3+/CD8+, CD3+/CD4+, and overall T lymphocytes were higher in responders versus non-responders at baseline (p = 0.017, p p = 0.034) and after treatment (p = 0.01, p = 0.003, p = 0.023). Reduced CECs, a tumor neoangiogenesis marker, were observed in responders after treatment (p 4.4) (p = 0.01). IPA showed that the majority of immunity-related genes were found upregulated in responders compared to non-responders before treatment, but not after. Conclusions Lymphocytes subpopulations, CECs and NLR could be interesting biomarkers predictive of response to everolimus-based regimens, potentially useful in daily clinical practice to select/monitor everolimus-based treatment in mBC. Further studies to confirm such hypotheses are warranted.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is generally considered a valid option for hormone receptor positive breast cancer (BC) patients who are unfit for chemotherapy or surgery. AIMS: Whilst numerous studies analyzed efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or endocrine therapy (HT) alone in hormone receptor positive patients, there is a lack of research looking at the usefulness of a preoperative combinatorial approach of CT and HT in this patient subgroup. METHODS: Using a predictive model previously described in the literature, developed to analyze the probability of benefit from preoperative chemotherapy, we were able to compare pathological complete response (pCR) rates expected with the use of CT alone with the pCR rates reported in a population of 192 patients treated with the combination of tamoxifen plus anthracycline-based CT at Cremona Hospital between 2003 and 2006. RESULTS: Even with a relatively small patient population, this approach provided insightful information for the selection of hormone receptor positive BC patients most likely to benefit from the use of preoperative HT and CT in combination. Whilst no statistically significant benefit was obtained with the addition of tamoxifen to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the entire population, or in any of the molecular stratification subgroups, the analysis of the calibration curve showed that a combinatorial approach may improve pCR in patients with luminal B tumors. More specific trials should be designed to confirm our initial results. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report investigating the efficacy of the combination of CT and HT in the neoadjuvant treatment of hormone receptor positive BC.

Background Endocrine treatment with Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is a staple in the management of hormone receptor positive breast cancer (HR + BC). It has become clear that HR + BC carries a consistent risk of relapse up to 15 years post-diagnosis. While increasing evidence supports the use of extended adjuvant Tamoxifen over 5 years, controversial data are available on the optimal duration of extended AIs adjuvant treatment. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the real impact of extended adjuvant therapy with AIs on disease-free survival (DFS). Methods A literature-based meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was undertaken. Relevant publications from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and abstracts from American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and San Antonio Breast Cancer (SABCS) symposia were searched. Primary and secondary endpoints were Disease Free Survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) respectively. A subgroup analysis was also performed to elucidate the impact of nodal involvement. Results The pooled analysis revealed a significant increase in DFS in the extended AIs group (hazard ratio (HR): 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68–0.90; P = 0.0006). The subgroup analysis according to nodal status showed a greater DFS benefit with extended AIs in patients with positive nodes (HR = 0.67 versus 0.80). Our analysis also demonstrated no improvement in OS with extended AIs (HR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.87–1.12; P = 0.84). Conclusion This work confirmed the efficacy of extended adjuvant treatment with AIs for HR + early breast cancer, with a 22% increase in DFS, but no impact on OS. Greater efficacy was observed in women with positive nodal status.

Background Histological status of axillary lymph nodes is an important prognostic factor in patients receiving surgery for breast cancer (BC). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (B) has rapidly replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and is now the standard of care for axillary staging in patients with clinically node-negative (N0) operable BC. The aim of this study is to compare pretreatment lymphoscintigraphy with a post primary systemic treatment (PST) scan in order to reduce the false-negative rates for SLNB. Methods In this single-institution study we considered 170 consecutive T2-4 N0-1 M0 BC patients treated with anthracycline-based PST. At the time of incisional biopsy, we performed sentinel lymphatic mapping. After PST, all patients repeated lymphoscintigraphy with the same methodology. During definitive surgery we performed further sentinel lymphatic mapping, SLNB and ALND. Results The SLN was removed in 158/170 patients giving an identification rate of 92.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 88.0–96.3%) and a false-negative rate of 14.0% (95% CI = 6.3–25.8%). SLNB revealed a sensitivity of 86.0% (95% CI = 74.2–93.7%), an accuracy of 94.9% (95% CI = 90.3–97.8%) and a negative predictive value of 92.7% (95% CI = 86.1–96.8%). Conclusion Identification rate, sensitivity and accuracy are in accordance with other studies on SLNB after PST, even after clinically negative node conversion following PST. This study confirms that diagnostic biopsy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy maintain breast lymphatic drainage unaltered.

The study investigated the anti-tumour effect of zoledronic acid (ZA) administered alone in a biological window therapy in naïve bone-only metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients. 33 patients with LABC (Group 1) and 20 patients with a first diagnosis of bone metastasis only (Group 2) received 4 mg single dose of ZA, 14 days (biological window) before starting any treatment. In Group 1, Ki67, CD34, p53/bcl-2 and caspase 3 expression along with the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels and RNA disruption index were evaluated as markers of tumor growth in tumour specimens obtained before and after ZA administration (basal, day 14). In Group 2, the total enumeration of circulating tumour cells (CTCs), and of M30+ve CTCs along with the soluble marker of cell death (M30/M65) were carried-out as markers of tumor dissemination at baseline, at 48 h and day 14th. In Group 1, there was a significant reduction in Ki67, CD34, bcl-2 expression after 14 days ZA based-treatment (p = 0.0032; p = 0.0001, p < 0.00001 respectively). ZA showed a significant increase of RNA disruption (p < 0.0076). In Group 2, we observed a significant reduction of CTCs number after 48 h (p = 0.0012), followed by a significant rebound at 14 days (p = 0.012). The apoptotic CTCs/M30+ve and M65 levels significantly increased under treatment (p = 0.018 and p = 0.039 respectively) after drug administration when compared to the baseline. These results are the first prospective in vivo data showing the direct pure anti-tumour effect (either on the tumour cell or on CTCs) of ZA.

The OLTRE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02681562) is an open-label, ‘window of opportunity’ Phase II controlled trial to evaluate the biological activity of olaparib in locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer compared with other subtypes of locally advanced breast cancer patients carrying germinal BRCA mutation receiving olaparib with the same treatment approach. The primary end point is to investigate the correlation between baseline gene and protein expression profile in order to identify possible predictive markers of response to olaparib. The OLTRE trial is expected to identify the surrogate markers of the biological activity of olaparib in the treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Background The VERITAS (A Phase 1B open-label study to assess the safety and tolerability of e ve rolimus in combination with e ri bulin in t riple-negative bre a st cancer s ) trial (EudraCT number: 2014-000135-17) is a phase Ib, open label, multicenter, dose-escalation, safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study based on the combination of everolimus with eribulin in sequential cohorts of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Patients and Methods The primary objective of the study is to identify the recommended dose of everolimus in combination with eribulin. Secondary endpoints include the assessment of pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of the experimental treatment. The sample size is based on the Bayesisan approach with regards to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) observed. An average sample size of approximately 12 patients is deemed reasonable based on simulations. Conclusion The VERITAS trial is expected to determine the recommended dose of everolimus in combination with eribulin in TBNC. This study may open the way for further analysis of this combination in phase II studies in this orphan disease of active drug combination such as the TNBC subset.

// Manuela Milani 1, * , Sergio Venturini 2, * , Simone Bonardi 1 , Giovanni Allevi 1 , Carla Strina 1 , Maria Rosa Cappelletti 1 , Silvia Paola Corona 3 , Sergio Aguggini 1 , Alberto Bottini 1 , Alfredo Berruti 4 , Adrian Jubb 5 , Leticia Campo 5 , Adrian L. Harris 5 , Kevin Gatter 5 , Stephen B. Fox 6 , Daniele Generali 1, 7 and Giandomenico Roviello 7, 8 1 U.O. Multidisciplinare di Patologia Mammaria, U.S Terapia Molecolare e Farmacogenomica, ASST Cremona, Viale Concordia 1, Cremona, Italy 2 CE.R.G.A.S., Universita Bocconi, Milano, Italy 3 Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Bentleigh East VIC, Australia 4 U.O. Oncologia Medica, Spedali Civili si Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy 5 Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DS, UK 6 Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 7 Department of Medical, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospitale 1, Trieste, Italy 8 Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, San Donato Hospital, Italy * Manuela Milani and Sergio Venturini contributed equally to the study Correspondence to: Daniele Generali, email: daniele.generali@gmail.com Keywords: epirubicin resistance, haemoglobin, hypoxia-inducible factor, neoadjuvant, breast cancer Received: September 21, 2015 Accepted: July 18, 2017 Published: August 14, 2017 ABSTRACT Purpose: To identify hypoxia-related biomarkers indicative of response and resistance to epirubicin treatment in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Patients and Methods: One hundred seventy-six women with T2-4 N0-1 breast tumours were randomly assigned to receive epirubicin 120 mg/m2/1-21 (EPI ARM), epirubicin 120 mg/m2/1-21 + erythropoietin 10.000 IU sc three times weekly (EPI-EPO ARM) and epirubicin 40 mg/m2/w-q21 (EPI-W ARM). Sixteen tumour proteins involved in cell survival, hypoxia, angiogenesis and growth factor, were assessed by immunohistochemistry in pre-treatment samples. A multivariate generalized linear regression approach was applied using a penalized least-square minimization to perform variable selection and regularization. Results: VEGF and GLUT-1 expression were significantly positively associated with complete response (CR) to treatment in all leave-one-out iterations. Bcl-2 expression was inversely correlated with pCR, whilst EPO expression was positively correlated with pathological complete response (pCR). Haemaglobin and HIF-1a nuclear expression were inversely correlated with pCR. HB and HIF-1a expression were associated with a higher risk of relapse and overall survival. Conclusion: Hypoxic biomarkers determines the epirubicin resistance in breast cancer. Assessment of such biomarkers, may be useful for predicting chemosensitivity and also anthracycline-based treatment outcome.

Breast cancer represents a heterogeneous group of diseases with varied biological features, behavior, and response to therapy; thus, management of breast cancer relies on the availability of robust predictive and prognostic factors to support therapy decision-making. Traditionally, neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer was preserved for locally advanced, converting an inoperable to a surgical resectable cancer. Neoadjuvant trials, additionally, offer: 1) the opportunity to evaluate new treatment options in a faster way and with fewer patients than large adjuvant trials; 2) to identify and validate the prognostic and predictive value of a marker with its association with clinical outcome in relation to the administered treatment. In this setting, thanks to new, affordable technologies which help to detail the molecular profiles of tumors, new trial designs based on new target therapies, like window-of-opportunity, are also suggested, as they represent the chance to identify tumor sensitivity or to overcome tumor resistance to the treatment used, based on its interaction with tumor biology in early tumor stages. However, clinicians and researchers should pay particular attention: In this setting, the safety of patients is paramount, given the exposure of potentially curable patients to investigational agents with limited safety experience, the definition of the study population and the study design, such as adaptive strategies, should limit patient exposure to ineffective agents, and intensify safety monitoring in the course of the treatment. Here, issues related to outcome determination in breast cancer, including some critical points of view, are presented.

INTRODUCTION: Recently the combination of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus and the aromatase inhibitor exemestane has been shown to double the progression-free survival rate in advanced breast cancer. However, the effect of the interrelated pathways of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and mTOR signaling, both of which are associated with a more aggressive breast cancer phenotype and endocrine resistance, on response in the neoadjuvant setting is unknown. We, therefore, have investigated the influence of these pathways with the aim of better defining those patients most likely to benefit from an endocrine-based therapy associated with/without mTOR inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 107 women with T2-4 N0-1 and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to 6 months of primary letrozole (2.5 mg/daily) (LET) or LET plus oral "metronomic" cyclophosphamide (50mg/daily) (LET-CYC). Phospo-mTOR and HIF-1α were evaluated in tumor specimens collected before and after treatment using a tissue microarray format. RESULTS: LET-based therapy induced a downregulation of phospho-mTOR and HIF-1α expression (P = .0001 and P < .004, respectively). The reduction of HIF-1α expression observed was positively correlated with phospho-mTOR reduction (P < .03); however, no treatment interaction between the two proteins was detected. HIF-1α expression was significantly modulated by the treatment (P < .004) with a reduction both in the LET arm (45%, n = 36/80) (P = .05) and LET-CYC arm (55%, n = 44/80) (P = .04). HIF-1α reduction showed a relationship with clinical response confined in LET arm only (P < .03). CONCLUSIONS: In this neoadjuvant population, LET was able to modulate the phospho-mTOR and HIF-1α pathways and may define a subpopulation of nonresponders who may be most likely to benefit from mTOR inhibitors

Purpose: To assess whether the combination of letrozole, metronomic cyclophosphamide and sorafenib (LCS) is well tolerated and shows activity in primary breast cancer (BC). Methods: Thirteen oestrogen receptor-positive, postmenopausal, T2-4, N0-1 BC patients received the LCS combination for 6 months. In these patients we examined the pharmacokinetics of sorafenib and cyclophosphamide, toxicity of the regimen, the clinical response to therapy and changes in the levels of biologically relevant biomarkers. Results: Adequate plasma concentrations of sorafenib were achieved in patients when it was dosed in combination with L+C. The mean plasma concentrations of C were consistently lower following administration of LCS, compared with administration of L+C only. The most common drug-related grade 3/4 adverse events were skin rash (69.3%), hand-foot skin reaction (69.3%) and diarrhoea (46.1%). According to RECIST Criteria, a clinical complete response was observed in 6 of 13 patients. A significant reduction in tumour size, evaluated with MRI, was also observed between baseline and 14 days of treatment in all 13 patients (P=0.005). A significant reduction in SUV uptake, measured by 18FDG-PET/CT, was observed in all patients between baseline and 30 days of treatment (P=0.015) and between baseline and definitive surgery (P=0.0002). Using modified CT Criteria, a response was demonstrated in 8 out of 10 evaluable patients at 30 days and in 11 out of 13 evaluable patients at the definitive surgery. A significant reduction in Ki67 expression was observed in all patients at day 14 compared with baseline (P

BACKGROUND: Although Trastuzumab has improved survival of HER2+ breast cancer patients, resistance to the agent pre-exists or develops through the course of therapy. Here we show that a specific metabolism and autophagy-related cancer cell phenotype relates to resistance of HER2+ breast cancer to Trastuzumab and chemotherapy. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with locally advanced primary breast cancer were prospectively scheduled to received one cycle of Trastuzumab followed by a new biopsy on day 21, followed by taxol/Trastuzumab chemotherapy for four cycles before surgery. FDG PET/CT scan was used to monitor tumour response. Tissue samples were immunohistochemically analysed for metabolism and autophagy markers. RESULTS: In pre-Trastuzumab biopsies, the LC3A+/HER2+ cell population was correlated with HIF1α expression (P=0.01), while GLUT1 and LC3B expression were correlated with Ki67 proliferation index (P=0.01 and P=0.01, respectively). FDG PET tumour dimensions before therapy were correlated with LC3B expression (P=0.005). Administration of Trastuzumab significantly reduced clinical and PET-detected tumour dimensions (P

// Katharina Feldinger 1 , Daniele Generali 3 , Gabriela Kramer-Marek 4,8 , Merel Gijsen 1 , Tzi Bun Ng 5 , Jack Ho Wong 5 , Carla Strina 3 , Mariarosa Cappelletti 3 , Daniele Andreis 3 , Ji-Liang Li 2 , Esther Bridges 2 , Helen Turley 2 , Russell Leek 2 , Ioannis Roxanis 6 , Jacek Capala 4 , Gillian Murphy 7 , Adrian L. Harris 2 and Anthony Kong 1 1 Human Epidermal Growth Factor Group, Department of Oncology, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK 2 Growth Factor Group, Department of Oncology, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK 3 U.O. Multidisciplinare di Patologia Mammaria, U.S Terapia Molecolare e Farmacogenomica, A.O. Instituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy 4 National Institutes of Health, Radiation Oncology Branch, Bethesda MD, US 5 School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Tai Po Road, Sha Tin, Hong Kong 6 Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK 7 Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK 8 Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Belmont, Sutton, Surrey, UK (New address) Correspondence: Anthony Kong, email: // Keywords : Trastuzumab, resistance, ADAM10, HER2, survival Received : March 8, 2014 Accepted : May 7, 2014 Published : May 8, 2014 Abstract Trastuzumab prolongs survival in HER2 positive breast cancer patients. However, resistance remains a challenge. We have previously shown that ADAM17 plays a key role in maintaining HER2 phosphorylation during trastuzumab treatment. Beside ADAM17, ADAM10 is the other well characterized ADAM protease responsible for HER ligand shedding. Therefore, we studied the role of ADAM10 in relation to trastuzumab treatment and resistance in HER2 positive breast cancer. ADAM10 expression was assessed in HER2 positive breast cancer cell lines and xenograft mice treated with trastuzumab. Trastuzumab treatment increased ADAM10 levels in HER2 positive breast cancer cells (p≤0.001 in BT474; p≤0.01 in SKBR3) and in vivo (p≤0.0001) compared to control, correlating with a decrease in PKB phosphorylation. ADAM10 inhibition or knockdown enhanced trastuzumab response in naive and trastuzumab resistant breast cancer cells. Trastuzumab monotherapy upregulated ADAM10 (p≤0.05); and higher pre-treatment ADAM10 levels correlated with decreased clinical response (p≤0.05) at day 21 in HER2 positive breast cancer patients undergoing a trastuzumab treatment window study. Higher ADAM10 levels correlated with poorer relapse-free survival (p≤0.01) in a cohort of HER2 positive breast cancer patients. Our studies implicate a role of ADAM10 in acquired resistance to trastuzumab and establish ADAM10 as a therapeutic target and a potential biomarker for HER2 positive breast cancer patients.

The role of HER4 in breast cancer is controversial and its role in relation to trastuzumab resistance remains unclear. We showed that trastuzumab treatment and its acquired resistance induced HER4 upregulation, cleavage and nuclear translocation. However, knockdown of HER4 by specific siRNAs increased trastuzumab sensitivity and reversed its resistance in HER2 positive breast cancer cells. Preventing HER4 cleavage by a γ-secretase inhibitor and inhibiting HER4 tyrosine kinase activity by neratinib decreased trastuzumab-induced HER4 nuclear translocation and enhanced trastuzumab response. There was also increased nuclear HER4 staining in the tumours from BT474 xenograft mice and human patients treated with trastuzumab. Furthermore, nuclear HER4 predicted poor clinical response to trastuzumab monotherapy in patients undergoing a window study and was shown to be an independent poor prognostic factor in HER2 positive breast cancer. Our data suggest that HER4 plays a key role in relation to trastuzumab resistance in HER2 positive breast cancer. Therefore, our study provides novel findings that HER4 activation, cleavage and nuclear translocation influence trastuzumab sensitivity and resistance in HER2 positive breast cancer. Nuclear HER4 could be a potential prognostic and predictive biomarker and understanding the role of HER4 may provide strategies to overcome trastuzumab resistance in HER2 positive breast cancer.

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the optimal scheduling of 2.5 mg daily letrozole in neoadjuvant breast cancer patients to obtain pathological complete response (pathCR) and assess Ki-67 expression as an early predictor of response.Patients and methods:This single institution study comprised 120 oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer (clinical stage ≥T2, N0-1), from three sequential cohorts (cohort A of 40, cohort B of 40 and cohort C of 40 patients, respectively) based on different duration of the neoadjuvant letrozole. Biological markers such as ER, progesterone receptor, HER2 and Ki-67 expression were tested at diagnosis and at definitive surgery.Results:A total of 89 patients (75.4%) achieved an objective response with 44 (37.3%) clinical CRs and 45 (38.1%) partial responses. The clinical CRs were significantly observed in cohort C (23 out of 40 patients, 57.5%) and B (16 out of 38 patients, 42.1%) compared with cohort A (5 out of 40 patients, 12.5%) (P-value for trend

Tumor spread from primary cardiac sarcoma to the bone is very rare and has a poor prognosis. Only six cases have been reported in the literature. We present a 32-year-old female patient with bone metastases from primary cardiac sarcoma.

Introduction: Single agent gemcitabine (GEM) is the standard treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Celecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor. Recent studies in human pancreatic tumor cell lines suggest an involvement of COX-2 in tumor-dependent angiogenesis and provide the rational for inhibition of the COX pathway as an effective therapeutic approach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the toxicity and activity of gemcitabine plus celecoxib. Patients and methods: Forty-two consecutive patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma entered the trial. Twenty-six patients (pts) were metastatic, 16 pts had locally advanced disease. The schedule consisted of GEM 1,000 mg/m2 (as a 30 min iv infusion) on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks and celecoxib 400 mg bid. Results: Four pts (9%) achieved a partial response and 26 (62%) had stable disease, gaining a total disease control in 30 pts (71% [95% CI, 58–84%]). Overall clinical benefit response was experienced by 23 pts (54.7% [95%CI, 38.6–70.1%]). Neither grade 4 neutropenia nor grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia was observed. Grade 3 neutropenia was detected in 19% of pts. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicity was as follows: hepatic toxicity 7%, nausea 2.3%. Three pts (7%) and 5 pts (12%) had respectively a minimum creatinine increase and edema. Median survival was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.5–10.6 months). Conclusion: GEM in combination with celecoxib showed low toxicity, good clinical benefit rate and good disease control. Further clinical investigation is warranted.

Background: HER3 is known to locate in the nucleus. Unlike HER4, nuclear HER3 translocation has not been reported to be due to a proteolytic cleavage process by ADAM17 and gamma-secretase. The mechanisms of nuclear HER3 induction and its role in relation to trastuzumab treatment and resistance for HER2-positive breast cancer is unclear. Methods: Using nuclear fractionation and confocal microscopy, nuclear HER3 localisation was investigated in response to trastuzumab with or without ADAM17 inhibitor and gamma-secretase inhibitor in a panel of HER2 expressing cell lines. We also correlated nuclear HER3 expression by immunohistochemistry with treatment response in patients who underwent window trastuzumab study as well as the survival outcome in a cohort of HER2-positive breast cancer patients using Kaplan–Meier survival curves with Log-rank test. Results: HER3 ligand heregulin and trastuzumab was found to induce nuclear HER3 translocation in HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines, including SKBR3. Nuclear HER3 was also enriched in acquired trastuzumab resistant SKBR3 cells (SKBr3-TR). Trastuzumab treatment induced several HER3 fragments and HER3100kD was found to be responsible for nuclear HER3 enrichment by fractionation. This fragment was confirmed to be a specific band of HER3 as shown by HER3 knockdown. Nuclear HER3 was reduced by inhibiting either gamma-secretase or ADAM17 inhibitor. Gamma-secretase or ADAM17 inhibitor reduced HER3100kD in both SKBr3 and SKBr3-TR cells. In HER2-positive breast cancer patients who underwent window trastuzumab study, baseline nuclear HER3 status was not a predictor of response for trastuzumab monotherapy at day 21. However, nuclear HER3 was enriched after trastuzumab treatment in a poor-responder patient. Total HER3 expression level in cytoplasm positively was correlated with poor response to trastuzumab monotherapy in HER2-positive patients (r = 0.67, p = 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival between positive and negative nuclear HER3 expression but the number of patients was small (n = 87). Further validation to assess nuclear HER3 expression as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in HER2-positive breast cancer patients undergoing trastuzumab treatment will be assessed in randomized tumour samples from FinHER study. Conclusion: Heregulin and trastuzumab treatment seems to induce nuclear HER3 translocation in some of the HER2 positive breast cancer cells. This may be due to proteolytic cleavage of HER3 as it is reduced by ADAM17 or gamma-secretase inhibitor. Enriched nuclear localisation of HER3 seems to be one possible mechanism of acquired resistance to trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-05-08.

Background: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy has been increasingly employed in clinical practice to improve surgical options for postmenopausal women with bulky hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Recent studies indicate that tumor response and in particular the pathologic complete response (CR) in this setting may predict long-term outcome. The letrozole approval in neoadjuvant setting is based on a study that included 4 months of letrozole treatment only. Prospective studies have not investigated treatment duration beyond 6 months, and retrospective studies suggest that useful responses can occur after this period. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and pathologic response of 2.5 mg daily letrozole used with different schedule in breast cancer patients (pts) unfit for chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: This single Institution retrospective study comprised 102 postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer (clinical stage ≥T2, N0-1), who were divided into 3 subgroups (34 each in single subgroup) according to the different duration of neoadjuvant letrozole treatment: 4 months (subgroup A), 8 months (subgroup B) or 12 months (subgroup C) of treatment. The subgroups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. Results: Pts and tumor characteristics included: median age 77.3 years (range 53.9–95.4); 100% estrogen receptor-positive, 81.4% progesterone receptor-positive; median Ki67 13.5% (range 2–90%). All pts were evaluable for clinical and pathologic response. A total of 77 pts (75.5%) achieved an objective response at individual end: 40 (39.2%) clinical CR and 37 (36.3%) partial responses (PR). The clinical CR were significantly confined to subgroups C (20/34 pts, 58.8%) and B (16/34 pts, 47.1%) than to subgroup A (4/34 pts, 11.8%) (p for trend = 0.00001). Objective response rate was 46.1% (47/102 pts) at month 4, 83.8% (57/68 pts) at month 8, and 94.1% (32/34 pts) at month 12 compared with baseline. As expected, letrozole induced a significant reduction of Ki67 expression after treatment in any single subgroup, without significant differences between them. With very interest, the pathologic CR rate was significantly higher in subgroup C (7/34 pts, 20.6%) than in subgroups A (1/34 pt, 2.9%) and B (1/34 pt, 2.9%) (p for trend Conclusions: One-year neoadjuvant letrozole therapy can lead to a high pathologic CR rate. This observation suggests that pathologic CR may be a reliable endpoint after endocrine therapy, but a long-term drug exposure is needed. The optimal letrozole treatment duration in neoadjuvant setting is a matter of future research. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD07-03.

e11546 Background: nPLD has the same clinical benefits but less toxicity than the traditional doxorubicin. It’s well reported mC produces anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic effect in tumours. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and activity of the association of nPLD and mC in pts with locally advanced BC. Methods: A total of 41 female pts with HER2-negative locally advanced BC unfit for standard chemotherapy received nPLD 25 mg/mq biweekly for eight courses along with mC 50 mg daily as primary systemic treatment. Toxicity and clinical-radiological response with Ki67 and CD31 expression were evaluated in tumour specimens obtained before and after treatment. Results: Pts characteristics included: median age 47.5 years; 31.7% Luminal A (LA), 56.1% Luminal B (LB), and 12.2% Triple Negative BC subtype classified by immunohistochemistry. The rate of breast-conserving surgery was 59.5%. All pts were evaluable for response. Objective response rate (ORR) was 58.5% (95% confidence interval, 42.1% to 73.7%), with 4 (9.7%) clinical complete responses (CR) and 20 (48.8%) partial responses. Sixteen pts (39.0%) achieved a stable disease and 1 pt progressed. One pt experienced a pathological CR. LA subtype was significantly associated with better ORR than others subtypes (p=0.049) and especially than LB (p=0.040). There was a borderline significant reduction of Ki67 expression after treatment (median, 15.5% to 9%; p=0.056), but no significant variation in CD31 expression (p=0.865). The majority of adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate. Grade ≥3 AEs included neutropenia (12.2%), vomiting (4.9%) and hyperglycemia (2.44%). Temporary treatment suspension due to toxicity occurred in 8 (19.5%) pts; discontinuation was necessary in 1 pt. No symptoms were related to impairment of cardiac function. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction levels did not change substantially before and after treatment: 58.7% and 57.1%, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of nPLD and mC is well tolerated, with a promising activity as preoperative therapy in unfit pts with locally advanced BC.

Aim: Treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) imposes great challenges, due to a lack of molecular targets. While use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs has been validated in ER-positive breast cancer, this option has not been investigated in TNBC, even though a significant portion of these tumors upregulate GnRH receptors. We performed a meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the effect of GnRH analogs in TNBC. Methods: Four studies were included in this study. Results: We detected a non-significant improvement in overall survival with GnRH analogs, while progression-free survival was unchanged. Discussion: The majority of the trials evaluated in this analysis were designed to test efficacy of GnRH analogs in preventing premature ovarian failure. This may represent a limitation of our study as these trials were not specifically designed to detect differences in survival outcome measures. Conclusion: Our results suggest that GnRH analogs may be useful as a targeted therapy in TNBC. Randomized prospective clinical trials are needed to investigate this hypothesis in the clinic.