Search

Adjacent segment degeneration is among the most recognized longterm complications of lumbar surgery for degenerative spine pathologies with a relevant impact in spine surgical and clinical practice. It is reported a incidence of clinical adjacent segment disease between 5-30% of patients undergoing spinal fusion. We aimed to evaluate the main clinical and surgical risk factors for developing adjacent segment disease.A systematic review and meta-analysis of the pertinent literature was performed, according to PRISMA and PICO guidelines, focusing on clinical and radiological adjacent segment disease. We exclusively included studies reporting demographic and clinical data, and surgical details published from 30 September 2015 to 30 September 2020. The effect of considered risk factors on the presence of adjacent segment disease was explored with a random-effects model.A total of 15 scientific publications, corresponding to 6253 patients, met the inclusion criteria for the qualitative and quantitative analysis. 720 of the patients developed a clinical and/or radiological adjacent syndrome disease, and 473 have been surgically managed. Ten articles qualified for the comparative geographical analysis. Advanced age and obesity are relevant risk factors for developing lumbar adjacent segment degeneration. Our data also reported a higher prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration in Western populations than in Eastern populations. The interbody fusion has a protective role toward lumbar adjacent segment degeneration.This study highlighted multifactorial issues regarding adjacent segment disease: clinical, anatomical, biomechanical, and radiological features. In view of increasing life expectancy and spinal surgery procedures, extensive multicenter studies will be needed to define the correct management of the adjacent segment disease.

This review aims to search for up-to-date information on epidemiology, natural course, and preventive measures of osteoporotic spine fractures.We reviewed the literature of the last ten years using keywords "natural course and osteoporotic vertebral fractures," "epidemiology and osteoporotic vertebral fractures" and "prevention and osteoporotic vertebral fractures." We then discussed the search results to reach an agreement in two consensus meetings on January and February 2021 of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee. Finally, we utilized the Delphi method to administer the questionnaire to preserve a high degree of validity. We summarized seven papers on the natural course, 15 articles on epidemiology, and 84 papers on preventing osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Finally, the consensus results after voting are presented.Natural course of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures is benign; many patients may have sufficient pain relief during the first three months with conservative treatment. At the end of one year of conservative treatment, 40% may still have pain with VAS-scores ≥4. Since the populations are aging, the incidence of OVF continues to rise. Although the prevalence varies across the globe, the highest rates are from North America and some countries of Asia. Preventive treatment of OVF must involve an active lifestyle, adequate nutrition, prevention of immobilization with physical therapy, and pharmacological therapy. Oral calcium and vitamin D are first-line interventions to prevent the bone mass loss, especially in postmenopausal women. There are many pharmacological treatment options; the decision must be made by fracture risk assessment (clinical factors + BMD + BMI) alone or along with DXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) or history of previous fragility fractures. The indication of one respect to the others is based on patient preference, compliance, and risk of discontinuation related to adverse events and administration method.The incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures increases with age and other factors. The natural course shows that most patients benefit from conservative therapy without any surgical intervention during the first three months. Preventive measures must include active lifestyle, adequate nutrition, prevention of immobilization with physical therapy, oral calcium, and vitamin D intake, and pharmacological therapy after fracture risk assessment.

Scientific knowledge today is being generated more rapidly than we can assimilate thus requiring continuous review of gold-standards for diagnosis and treatment of specific pathologies. The aim of this paper is to provide an update on the best early management of spinal cord injury (SCI), in order to produce acceptable worldwide recommendations to standardize clinical practice as much as possible.The WFNS Spine Committee voted recommendations regarding management of SCI based on literature review of the last 10 years. The committee stated 9 recommendations on 3 main topics: (1) clinical assessment and classification of SCI; (2) emergency care and early management; (3) cardiopulmonary management. American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale, Spinal Cord Independence Measure, and International Spinal Cord Injury Basic Pain Data Set are considered the most useful and feasible in emergency evaluation and follow-up in case of SCI. Magnetic resonance imaging is the most indicated examination to evaluate patients with symptomatic SCI. In early phase, correction of hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg), and bradycardia are strongly recommended. Surgical decompression should be performed as soon as possible with the ideal surgical time being within 8 hours for both complete and incomplete lesions.

We present an automated method for extracting anatomical parameters from biplanar radiographs of the spine, which is able to deal with a wide scenario of conditions, including sagittal and coronal deformities, degenerative phenomena as well as images acquired with different fields of view. The location of 78 landmarks (end plate centers, hip joint centers, and margins of the S1 end plate) was extracted from three-dimensional reconstructions of 493 spines of patients suffering from various disorders, including adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, adult deformities, and spinal stenosis. A fully convolutional neural network featuring an additional differentiable spatial to numerical (DSNT) layer was trained to predict the location of each landmark. The values of some parameters (T4–T12 kyphosis, L1–L5 lordosis, Cobb angle of scoliosis, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt) were then calculated based on the landmarks’ locations. A quantitative comparison between the predicted parameters and the ground truth was performed on a set of 50 patients. The spine shape predicted by the models was perceptually convincing in all cases. All predicted parameters were strongly correlated with the ground truth. However, the standard errors of the estimated parameters ranged from 2.7° (for the pelvic tilt) to 11.5° (for the L1–L5 lordosis). The proposed method is able to automatically determine the spine shape in biplanar radiographs and calculate anatomical and posture parameters in a wide scenario of clinical conditions with a very good visual performance, despite limitations highlighted by the statistical analysis of the results. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Objective Traumatic spinal injury (TSI) is a global health issue contributing to morbidity and mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to compare the epidemiological estimates of TSI with the corresponding amount of published papers for different regions. Methods A bibliometric analysis was performed by collecting the number of publications concerning TSI from the PubMed database. Results were sorted according to the different geographical World Health Organization regions. A “publication-to-volume ratio” was obtained by comparing the average number of documents per year with the number of TSI cases across each region. Results A total of 2304 articles were detected from 2008 to 2018. The major publishing regions were North America (AMR-US/Can: 843 articles, 36.6%) and Europe (EUR: 833, 36.2%), then Western Pacific (WPR: 410, 17.8%), Eastern Mediterranean (EMR: 73, 3.2%), South-East Asia (SEAR: 71, 3.1%), Latin America (AMR-L: 55, 2.4%), Africa (AFR: 19, 0.8%). The United States is the most publishing country in AMR-US/Can (86.0%), and Germany in EUR (22.4%). In 2018, EUR published 36.6% of papers versus AMR-US/Can 26.5% and WPR 25.7%, thanks to an increase in Chinese publications. The highest publication ratios of 4.63 and 2.68 were found for AMR-US/Can and EUR, respectively. The other were EMR (0.22), WPR (0.18), AMR-L (0.07), SEAR (0.03), and AFR (0.01). Conclusions A marked divide is currently found between countries with a high burden of TSI and those where there is most research interest, estimated as amount of publications. Data demonstrate the need for increased inclusiveness in guidelines generation from high-income countries including collection and analysis from low- and middle-income countries.

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is defined as a degenerative disorder showing a narrowing of the spinal canal. The diagnosis is straightforward in cases with typical neurogenic claudication symptoms and unequivocal imaging findings. However, not all patients present with typical symptoms, and there is obviously no correlation between the severity of stenosis and clinical complaint. The radiologic diagnosis of LSS is widely discussed in the literature. The best diagnostic test for the diagnosis of LSS is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, canal diameter measurements have not gained much consensus from radiologists, whereas qualitative measures, such as cerebrospinal fluid space obliteration, have achieved greater consensus. Instability can best be defined by standing lateral radiograms and flexion-extension radiograms. For cases showing typical neurogenic claudication symptoms and unequivocal imaging findings, the diagnosis is straightforward. However, not all patients present with typical symptoms, and there is obviously no correlation between the severity of stenosis (computed tomography and MRI) and clinical complaint. In fact, recent MRI studies have shown that mild-to-moderate stenosis can also be found in asymptomatic individuals. Routine electrophysiological tests such as lower extremity electromyography, nerve conduction studies, F-wave, and H-reflex are not helpful in the diagnosis and outcome prediction of LSS. The electrophysiological recordings are complementary to the neurologic examination and can provide confirmatory information in less obvious clinical complaints. However, in the absence of reliable evidence, imaging studies should be considered as a first-line diagnostic test in the diagnosis of degenerative LSS. © 2020 The Authors

Background: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a progressive disease with potentially dangerous consequences that affect quality of life. Despite the detailed literature, natural history is unpredictable. This uncertainty presents a challenge making the correct management decisions, especially in patients with mild to moderate symptoms, regarding conservative or surgical treatment. This article focused on conservative treatment for degenerative LSS. Methods: To standardize clinical practice worldwide as much as possible, the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Spine Committee held a consensus conference on conservative treatment for degenerative LSS. A team of experts in spinal disorders reviewed the literature on conservative treatment for degenerative LSS from 2008 to 2018 and drafted and voted on a number of statements. Results: During 2 consensus meetings, 14 statements were voted on. The Committee agreed on the use of physical therapy for up to 3 months in cases with no neurologic symptoms. Initial conservative treatment could be applied without major complications in these cases. In patients with moderate to severe symptoms or with acute radicular deficits, surgical treatment is indicated. The efficacy of epidural injections is still debated, as it shows only limited benefit in patients with degenerative LSS. Conclusions: A conservative approach based on therapeutic exercise may be the first choice in patients with LSS except in the presence of significant neurologic deficits. Treatment with instrumental modalities or epidural injections is still debated. Further studies with standardization of outcome measures are needed to reach high-level evidence conclusions. © 2020 The Authors

Background: Although decompression is the basis of surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), under various circumstances instrumented fusion is performed as well. The rationale for mobility-preserving operations for LSS is preventing adjacent segment disease (ASD). We review the rationale for mobility preservation in ASD and discuss related topics such as indications for fusion and the evolving role of minimally invasive approaches to lumbar spine decompression. Our focus is on systematic review and consensus discussion of mobility-preserving surgical methods as related to surgery for LSS. Methods: Groups of spinal surgeons (members of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Spine Committee) performed systematic reviews of dynamic fixation systems, including hybrid constructs, and of interspinous process devices; consensus statements were generated based on the reviews at 2 voting sessions by the committee several months apart. Additional review of background data was performed, and the results summarized in this review. Results: Decompression is the basis of surgical treatment of LSS. Fusion is an option, especially when spondylolisthesis or instability are present, but indications remain controversial. ASD incidence reports show high variability. ASD may represent the natural progression of degenerative disease in many cases. Older age, poor sagittal balance, and multilevel fusion may be associated with more ASD. Dynamic fixation constructs are treatment options that may help prevent ASD. © 2020 The Authors

Background In the modern era evidence-based medicine, guidelines and recommendations represent a key-point of daily activity. The Spinal Section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery introduced some recommendations regarding Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis based on those of the Spine Committee of World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies, revising them on the basis of Italian common practice. Methods In June 2019, a Committee of 21 spine surgeons met in Rome to validate the recommendations of the WFNS. Furthermore, they decided to review the ones that did not reach a consensus to create Italian Recommendations on Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis. A literature review of the last ten years was performed and the statements were voted using the Delphi method. Results 41 statements were discussed and 7 statements were voted again to reach a consensus with respect to those of the WFNS. A total of 40 statements reached a consensus, of which 36 reached a positive consensus and 4 a negative consensus, while no consensus was reached in 1 case. Conclusions Conservative multimodal therapy, tailored on the patient, is a reasonable and effective first option choice for the treatment of LSS patients with tolerable moderate symptoms. Surgical treatment is reserved for symptomatic patients non-responding to conservative treatment or with neurological deficits. The best surgical technique to use depends on personal experience; modern MISS techniques are equivalent to open decompressive surgery with some advantages and higher cost-effectiveness. Fusion surgery and mobility preserving surgery only have a marginal role in the treatment of DLSS without instability.

BACKGROUND Intramedullary spinal cord tumors are rare lesions of the central nervous system. Anatomical, molecular and radiological features are well defined, but correct management is still matter of debate. Pertinent literature has reported conflicting opinions regarding the use of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring (IONM) in the surgical treatment of this kind of lesions, recently. We report a retrospective study from two Italian centres, in order to highlight the usefulness of IONM in the management of intramedullary lesions. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients with intramedullary spinal tumor who underwent surgical resection from February 2011 to February 2018 in two different institutions. Clinical and radiological data, lesion features, timing of symptom onset and IONM findings were record ed . The IONM includ ed somatosensory-evoked potentials(SSEP), motor-evoked potentials(MEP) and D-Wave whenever possible. We evaluated the outcome according to the Modified McCormick scale. We also evaluated the accuracy and relevance of surgical outcomes for each evoked potential(SSEP, MEP, D-Wave). RESULTS A total of 57 patients were included. A gross total removal was achieved in 46 cases. Neurological follow-up was assessment at 3 days, and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Comparing the preoperative status and 6 months follow-up: the M-McCormick scale showed a neurological stability for 30 patients (52.63%), a worsening of neurological status for 7 patients (12.28%) and an improvement for 20 patients (35.08%). IONM presented high accuracy (sensibility of 100% and specificity of 95.65%) and significantly pred icted postoperative permanent motor d eficits(P

Background Image-guided navigation systems are well establish technologies; their use in clinical practice is growing. To date many publications have demonstrated their accuracy and safety. However, the acquisition and maintenance costs are high. In an era in which health expenditures are rising exponentially, analyses of the economic impact of new technologies are mandatory to assess their sustainability. Methods A retrospective analysis to assess the overall costs of a series of patients admitted to our Neurosurgical Department for spinal instrumentation. We compared two different types of spinal navigation systems: based on preoperative CT scan (January 2003-April 2009) and on intraoperative CT-like scan (April 2009-March 2013). We used a micro-costing approach by a hospital perspective considering all the phases of the treatment process, from pre admission testing to discharge. Results The study includes 875 patients. Baseline data, hospitalization and complications were similar for both. Mean cost was 7,305.9 € for intraoperative CT scan procedure and 7,666.2 € for preoperative image-guided system. The effectiveness, in terms of screw accuracy was similar. Higher costs were related to implanted materials, human resources, and disposable. Conclusions There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of costs. A break-even point for the acquisition of an intraoperative image system is calculated in almost 130 procedures. Moreover, nowadays this system is used for more than only screw insertion reducing the financial impact of this technology on a Hospital.

BACKGROUND In surgery, the learning process represents one of the critical topics in the development of a young surgeon where there is often no standardized learning program. The learning curve is defined by plotting proficiency as a function of time, or the number of repetitions. In this study, we analyzed the learning process for a rare and surgically demanding pathology such as thoracic disc herniations (TDHs) treated with an antero-lateral trans-thoracic approach. METHODS We analyzed a consecutive series of patients admitted with a diagnosis of TDHs. All patients underwent surgery using a standard antero-lateral trans-thoracic approach, assisted by navigation system based on intraoperative 3D imaging performed with O-Arm™ (Medtronic; Dublin, Ireland) system. RESULTS Twenty-one patients underwent surgery from January 2012 to June 2017. The time analysis shows a progressive reduction in time from the first to the last case with continued improvement in operating time but progressively less dramatic, this is explicable considering the classic learning curve model. Predictably, a slow learning curve was charted - typical for a technically demanding procedure associated with a rare incidence of pathology. CONCLUSIONS A learning curve is an easy and efficient way to gauge the growth of a surgeon. After 21 cases we obtained an intermediate profile of learning curve between steep and shallow. Despite different alternatives for speeding up the learning process it is not always possible to standardize and reflect them in a learning process. Today, the use of technology is often considered in this but does not always affect the process itself.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Spinal navigation and image-guided system (IGS) are, up to now, well establish technologies, and thanks to their excellent results their spread is growing. In the latest years many publications and meta-analyses demonstrate their accuracy and safety, and even more center adopted IGS in daily activity. However, the acquisition and maintenance costs of these systems are high, and not all the hospital and clinics can effort its purchase. In an era when health expenditure is rising exponentially, cost-effectiveness analyses are mandatory to responsibly manage the scarce health care resources and to define if this technology is economically sustainable and which criteria must be respect to justify its acquisition. PURPOSE The purpose of the present study was to perform a detailed cost-effectiveness analysis to determine the value of a navigation system coupled with intra-operative 3D imaging in adult spinal surgery analyzed thought a micro costing approach in a period of 10years. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cost-effectiveness study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients operated on our surgical department between 2003 and 2013. METHODS A retrospective cost-effectiveness study was conducted to analyze the overall costs of a population of patients admitted to our Neurosurgical department for spine fixation surgery. In the present study the authors have analyzed the entire population of patients treated for spinal instrumentation with the aid of an IGS system from January 2003 to March 2013. The cost-effectiveness study compared two different type of spinal navigation: system based on a preoperative CT scan (from January 2003 to April 2009 – group I) and the intraoperative CT like scan system (from April 2009 to March 2013 – group II). The economic evaluation is conducted from a hospital perspective. Costs of the two procedures are measured and valued using a microcosting approach. All costs incurred by the hospital are collected from the hospital's accounting service. The evaluation took into consideration all of the phases, from preadmission testing to discharge. Cost of the complications are considered and analyzed as well. RESULTS The study includes 499 patients with a total of 2,542 screws inserted with IGS. Baseline data were similar for the two groups, as were hospitalization and complications. The full cost of the two procedures was analysed: mean cost with intraoperative CT scan system procedure was 6.545 € (±525.9) and 6.853 (±564.3) with preoperative image-guided system. The screws' accuracy were respectively 98.5% and 96.1%. Higher costs were identified for human resources, disposable and implanted materials (more than 1.000 €); in particular, cost of human source were higher for the use of preoperative scan. The higher total cost of the procedure with preoperative scan is related for the major part to the cost of CT scan (preoperative for navigation and postoperative for control). CONCLUSIONS The results of our study show a cost difference that is not statistically significant between the two procedures. However, the use of the intraoperative CT scan system suggests an economic advantage in a long-term point of view. It consent to reduce surgical time and complications bringing to a better clinical result; consent an economics saving in term of human resource and number and type of radiological imaging. A break-even point is estimated after almost 150 procedures. Moreover, nowadays this system is used for more than only screws insertion reducing the financial impact of this technology on the hospital.

Background Image-guided surgery techniques in spinal surgery are usually based upon fluoroscopy or computed tomography (CT) scan, which allow for a real-time navigation of bony structures, though not of neural structures and soft tissue remains. Objective To verify the effectiveness and efficacy of a novel technique of imaging merging between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative CT scan during removal of intramedullary lesions. Methods Ten consecutive patients were treated for intramedullary lesions using a navigation system aid. Preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI was merged in the navigation software, with an intraoperative CT acquisition, performed using the O-arm TM system (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Minneapolis, Minnesota). Dosimetric and timing data were also acquired for each patient. Results The fusion process was achieved in all cases and was uneventful. The merged imaging information was useful in all cases for defining the exact area of laminectomy, dural opening, and the eventual extension of cordotomy, without requiring exposition corrections. The radiation dose for the patients was 0.78 mSv. Using the authors' protocol, it was possible to merge a preoperative MRI with navigation based on intraoperative CT scanning in all cases. Information gained with this technique was useful during the different surgical steps. However, there were some drawbacks, such as the merging process, which still remains partially manual. Conclusion In this initial experience, MRI and CT merging and its feasibility were tested, and we appreciated its safety, precision, and ease.