1. Real Field Deployment of a Smart Fiber Optic Surveillance System for Pipeline Integrity Threat Detection: Architectural Issues and Blind Field Test Results
- Author
-
Pedro Corredera Guillen, Javier Tejedor, Guy De Pauw, Carl Henrik Ahlen, Miguel Gonzalez-Herraez, Willy Postvoll, Hugo F. Martins, Javier Macias-Guarasa, Sonia Martin-Lopez, Filip De Smet, Juan Pastor-Graells, and Universidad de Alcalá. Departamento de Electrónica
- Subjects
Distributed fiber sensing ,Vibration sensing ,Computer science ,Pipeline (computing) ,Real-time computing ,Fast Fourier transform ,02 engineering and technology ,Interval (mathematics) ,Acoustic sensing ,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics ,phase-sensitive OTDR ,Section (fiber bundle) ,Pipeline transport ,Identification (information) ,020210 optoelectronics & photonics ,Pipeline integrity ,Pattern recognition ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Systems design ,Electrónica ,False alarm ,Electronics - Abstract
This paper presents an on-line augmented surveillance system that aims to real time monitoring of activities along a pipeline. The system is deployed in a fully realistic scenario and exposed to real activities carried out in unknown places at unknown times within a given test time interval (socalled blind field tests). We describe the system architecture that includes specific modules to deal with the fact that continuous on-line monitoring needs to be carried out, while addressing the need of limiting the false alarms at reasonable rates. To the best or our knowledge, this is the first published work in which a pipeline integrity threat detection system is deployed in a realistic scenario (using a fiber optic along an active gas pipeline) and is thoroughly and objectively evaluated in realistic blind conditions. The system integrates two operation modes: The machine+activity identification mode identifies the machine that is carrying out a certain activity along the pipeline, and the threat detection mode directly identifies if the activity along the pipeline is a threat or not. The blind field tests are carried out in two different pipeline sections: The first section corresponds to the case where the sensor is close to the sensed area, while the second one places the sensed area about 35 km far from the sensor. Results of the machine+activity identification mode showed an average machine+activity classification rate of 46:6%. For the threat detection mode, 8 out of 10 threats were correctly detected, with only 1 false alarm appearing in a 55:5-hour sensed period., European Commission, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Comunidad de Madrid
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF