Search

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is among the most prevalent psychiatric conditions and a leading cause of disability worldwide. MDD presents a diverse range of symptoms that significantly impact personal, societal, and economic dimensions. Despite the availability of numerous antidepressant treatments (ADTs) targeting different molecular mechanisms, a substantial proportion of patients experience inadequate response, presenting a considerable challenge in MDD management. As a result, adjunctive strategies, particularly involving atypical antipsychotics, are often employed to enhance treatment efficacy. Cariprazine, a D2/D3 partial agonist, is distinguished from other atypical antipsychotics by its selective action on the D3 receptor and its modulation of 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, and alpha 1B receptors. This distinctive pharmacological profile warrants investigation into its potential effectiveness and tolerability across various symptom domains of MDD, including pleasure, interest, and motivation; mood and suicidality; sleep and appetite; fatigue; psychomotor activity and anxiety; and cognitive function. Preliminary evidence from animal studies and clinical trials suggests that cariprazine may improve motivation, anhedonia, and cognitive function symptoms. Cariprazine shows promise in alleviating mood-related symptoms, though its impact on anxiety and its effects on agitation and psychomotor retardation remains uncertain. Cariprazine may be particularly beneficial for patients with MDD exhibiting anhedonia, cognitive deficits, and possibly fatigue and hypersomnia. Evaluating cariprazine's efficacy across these symptom domains could reveal patterns that support more personalized treatment approaches for depression. Further research is essential to elucidate the role of cariprazine as an adjunctive therapy for adults with major depressive disorder who have an inadequate response to antidepressant monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early symptomatic improvement may predict treatment response in bipolar I disorder. Cariprazine has demonstrated early treatment effects in bipolar I depression and mania studies; therefore, we assessed whether early improvement with cariprazine predicts eventual treatment response. Post hoc analyses used pooled data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled bipolar I depression (NCT02670538 , NCT02670551) and mania (NCT00488618 , NCT01058096 , NCT01058668) trials. In depression studies (cariprazine 1.5 mg/d, 3 mg/d, or placebo), early improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total scores (≥25 % improvement at day 15) and subsequent depressive/anxiety symptom response status (≥50 % improvement at week 6) were assessed. In mania studies (cariprazine 3–12 mg/d or placebo), early improvement in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total scores (≥25 % improvement at day 7) and manic symptom response status (≥50 % improvement at week 3) were assessed. Patients with bipolar I depression and early MADRS improvement were approximately 4- to 6-times as likely to achieve MADRS or HAM-A response than those without early improvement; patients with early HAM-A improvement were approximately 3- to 4-times as likely to achieve MADRS or HAM-A response. A subset of patients without early improvement with cariprazine 1.5 mg/d (20 %–31 %) subsequently responded following up-titration. Patients with mania and early YMRS improvement were approximately 5 times more likely to have manic symptom response than those without early improvement. Post hoc analysis; relatively short study durations; flexible-dosing (mania studies). Early symptom improvement with cariprazine may inform therapeutic decisions for patients with bipolar I disorder. • Early improvement with cariprazine predicted week 6 bipolar I depression response. • Early improvement in manic symptoms was also predictive of week 3 mania response. • Some patients without early improvement responded after cariprazine up-titration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cariprazine has emerged as a promising augmenting treatment agent for unipolar depression and as a monotherapy option for bipolar depression. We evaluated cariprazine's efficacy in treating acute major depressive episodes in individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder. A systematic review was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and ScanMedicine. Study quality was assessed using the RoB 2 tool. Pairwise and dose-response meta-analyses were conducted with RStudio. Evidence quality was assessed with GRADE. Nine RCTs meeting inclusion criteria encompassed 4889 participants. Cariprazine, compared to placebo, significantly reduced the MADRS score (MD = −1.49, 95 % CI: −2.22 to −0.76) and demonstrated significantly higher response (RR = 1.21, 95 % CI: 1.12 to 1.30) and remission (RR = 1.19, 95 % CI: 1.06 to 1.34) rates. Subgroup analysis unveiled statistically significant reductions in MADRS score in MDD (MD = −1.15, 95 % CI: −2.04 to −0.26) and bipolar I disorder (BDI) (MD = −2.53, 95 % CI: −3.61 to −1.45), higher response rates for both MDD (RR = 1.19, 95 % CI: 1.08 to 1.31) and BDI (RR = 1.27, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 1.46), and higher remission rates only for BDI (RR = 1.41, 95 % CI: 1.24 to 1.60). A higher rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was observed. Reliance solely on RCTs limits generalisability; strict criteria might not reflect real-world diversity. Cariprazine demonstrates efficacy in treating major depressive episodes, although variations exist between MDD and BDI and tolerability may be an issue. • Cariprazine reduces depressive symptoms in individuals in a depressive episode. This effect is evident for MDD and BD • Response and remission rates were higher in individuals with a depressive episode after cariprazine (vs. placebo) treatment • Akathisia, insomnia, nausea and weight gain were increased after cariprazine compared to placebo • Increased dose (1.5 to 3 mg) was associated with greater reduction in depressive symptoms and a greater side effect burden [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of a new psychopharmaceutical medication instead of the previous one always poses a certain challenge. In the case of antipsychotics (AP), these problems are considerably more complicated and are mainly caused by the question of dose equivalents, but also by the pharmacokinetic properties of the drug. In the case of partial dopamine D2 agonists, an additional issue is the possibility of deterioration when switching from the previous D2 antagonists to these drugs. Cross-titration is therefore generally recommended. Finally, due to the capsule form, it is not possible to increase the dose of cariprazine by less than 1.5 mg during titration. In this paper, we have presented our proposal to replace the most commonly used second-generation APs with the third-generation AP cariprazine. We have taken into account the dose equivalents, the pharmacological forms of the drugs and their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The task of a psychiatrist is to select the most appropriate medication or combination of drugs to treat the symptoms of schizophrenia while minimizing the risk of side effects and ensuring the patient achieves the highest level of functioning possible. This is a challenging task as the action of each drug or group of drugs is different. The efficacy of cariprazine, which affects D3 receptors as a D3/D2 receptor partial agonist, has been extensively studied and is one of the first medication choices by practicing psychiatrists when treating patients with negative symptomatology. In this clinical case, we demonstrate the effective and safe treatment of a patient's positive and affective symptoms using a combination of cariprazine, clozapine, and venlafaxine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

After over a hundred years of research, the question whether the symptoms of schizophrenia are rather trait-like (being a relatively stable quality of individuals) or state-like (being substance to change) is still unanswered. To assess the trait and the state component in patients with acute schizophrenia, one group receiving antipsychotic treatment, the other not. Data from four phase II/III, 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of similar design that included patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were pooled. In every trial, one treatment group received a third-generation antipsychotic, cariprazine, and the other group placebo. To assess symptoms of schizophrenia, the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) was applied. Further analyses were conducted using the five subscales as proposed by Wallwork and colleagues. A latent state–trait (LST) model was developed to estimate the trait and state components of the total variance of the observed scores. All symptom dimensions behaved more in a trait-like manner. The proportions of all sources of variability changed over the course of the observational period, with a bent around weeks 3 and 4. Visually inspected, no major differences were found between the two treatment groups regarding the LST structure of symptom dimensions. This high proportion of inter-individual stability may represent an inherent part of symptomatology that behaves independently from treatment status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and purpose Cariprazine is an atypical antipsychotic drug approved for the treatment of schizophrenia, as well as manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar disorder. It functions as a dopamine multifunctional agent, a partial agonist at dopamine and serotonin receptors. Unlike the majority of antipsychotics, which primarily target positive symptoms through dopaminergic antagonism, often neglecting negative, cognitive, and affective symptoms, the unique cariprazine's pharmacological profile, particularly potent blockade of D3 dopamine receptors, suggests the potential for numerous clinical applications. The aim of this study is to present current knowledge of cariprazine, focusing particularly on its mechanism of action, potential applications, adverse effects, and pharmacokinetic properties that could impact its clinical use. Methods and materials A review of the literature available in the PubMed database was performed using the key words: cariprazine; atypical antipsychotic drug; antipsychotic medication; schizophrenia treatment; bipolar disorder treatment; mania treatment; depression treatment, dopamine agonist. Conclusions Cariprazine demonstrates a unique pharmacological profile, offering potential benefits in managing a wide range of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder (mania, depression, mixed episodes), unipolar depression, and co-occurring substance use disorders. Clinical studies have shown efficacy in reducing symptoms and improving negative and cognitive function, with a favorable metabolic profile, minimal impact on cardiovascular system, and generally mild adverse effect profile. However, further research is necessary to explore its full therapeutic potential and optimize its clinical use in diverse patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with bipolar I disorder may experience mood destabilization or treatment-emergent affective switch (TEAS) from one symptom pole to the other spontaneously or following treatment. Optimal treatment should address symptoms from both poles without precipitating destabilization. These were pooled post hoc analyses of data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of cariprazine 3–12 mg/d for bipolar I mania (NCT00488618 , NCT01058096 , NCT01058668) and cariprazine 1.5 mg/d or 3 mg/d for bipolar I depression (NCT01396447 , NCT02670538 , NCT02670551). Changes from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at week 6 and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score at week 3 were analyzed in each indication using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Percentages of patients with increasing levels of endpoint response and TEAS (bipolar mania = MADRS total score ≥ 19; bipolar depression = YMRS score ≥ 16) were determined. Cariprazine significantly reduced manic and depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar I disorder mood episodes. In patients with a manic episode and up to mild baseline depressive symptoms, cariprazine also significantly reduced depressive symptoms. In patients with a depressive episode and manic symptoms in remission at baseline, numerical reduction (without statistical significance) in YMRS indicated no worsening of mania. In both indications, cariprazine-treated patients had numerically greater response rates (presenting symptom pole) than placebo-treated patients; lower percentages of cariprazine- than placebo-treated patients had TEAS at visits where data were collected. Post hoc analysis. Results suggested that cariprazine had full-spectrum efficacy across symptoms from both poles in patients with bipolar I disorder mood episodes; TEAS risk was low. Patient-level response suggested that improvement was clinically relevant. • Patients with bipolar I disorder may experience treatment-related mood instability • Treatment should address symptoms from both poles, without causing affective switch • Results suggest cariprazine has full-spectrum symptom efficacy in bipolar I disorder • With cariprazine treatment, risk of treatment-emergent affective switch was low [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD) is debilitating psychiatric disorder, particularly common in female and forensic populations. However, appropriate pharmacological treatment to effectively manage symptoms of EUPD remains an unmet clinical need. Dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs), such as aripiprazole, have a favourable tolerability profile and have demonstrated some benefits in targeting symptoms of emotional dysregulation, although, evidence regarding the effects of novel D2/D3 DRPA cariprazine in EUPD patients has been limited. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of cariprazine for EUPD in a case series of female forensic inpatients where the diagnosis is more prevalent. Methods: Demographic and clinical information of the patients were collected from patient electronic records during their admission in a specialized NHS forensic service. Treatment response was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at baseline, 3 and 6 months and Global Clinical Impression Scale (CGI-scores) at baseline and 6 months. Tolerability and BMI, ECG QTc interval and prolactin levels were recorded prior to initiation and at 6 months. Results: Eight female patients with EUPD (mean age 29.8 years, SD 5.3) were treated with cariprazine (range 3-6mg). Total CGI-scores modestly improved from 5.6 baseline to 5.0 at 6 months. There was a reduction in mean total PANSS scores from baseline to 6 months (92.5, SD 8.1 to 72.4, SD 15.8), general psychopathology (56.1 SD 6.7 to 42.5, SD9.7), positive (21.9 SD 4.6 to 17.1, SD4.8) and negative PANSS scores (14.5 SD 6.3 to 12.8, SD4.6), corresponding to a 21%, 23%, 20% and 3% mean score reduction, respectively. Cariprazine demonstrated a favourable metabolic and hormonal side effect profile with no treatment discontinuation at 6 months follow up. Conclusion: This is the first case series to evaluate the effectiveness of cariprazine in EUPD. Its efficacy in improving PANSS and CGI-S scores was overall modest and highly variable, reflective of an inherently heterogenous and comorbid patient sample but the benefits on treatment perseverance and tolerability were considerable. Cariprazine may be of particular benefit in EUPD where psychotic symptoms are co-morbid, as an augmentation strategy to clozapine, or where previous antipsychotics have caused metabolic or hormonal side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hostility, irritability, and agitation are common in patients with bipolar I disorder. Post hoc analyses evaluated the effect of cariprazine on these symptoms in patients with bipolar I mania. Data were pooled from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 cariprazine trials in adults with bipolar I manic/mixed episodes (NCT00488618 , NCT01058096 , NCT01058668); pooled cariprazine doses (3–12 mg/d) were analyzed. Patients were categorized into hostility/irritability and agitation subgroups by baseline scores: Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) irritability and disruptive-aggressive behavior items score ≥ 2; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) hostility item ≥ 2; PANSS–Excited Component (PANSS-EC) total score ≥ 14 and score ≥ 4 on ≥ 1 individual item. Changes from baseline to week 3 in hostility/irritability- and agitation-related outcomes were evaluated. Adjustments were made for the presence of other manic symptoms, sedation, and akathisia. Most patients met subgroup inclusion criteria (YMRS hostility = 930; PANSS hostility = 841, PANSS-EC agitation = 486). In the YMRS subgroup, least squares mean differences in change from baseline were statistically significant for cariprazine versus placebo on YMRS hostility/irritability-related items (irritability [−0.93], disruptive-aggressive behavior [−0.79], combined [−1.75]; P ≤ 0.001 each), YMRS total score (−5.92, P ≤ 0.0001), and all individual YMRS items (−0.25 to −0.93, P ≤ 0.0001); differences remained significant after adjustment for other manic symptoms, sedation, and akathisia. Differences in PANSS hostility and PANSS-EC subgroups were significant for cariprazine versus placebo (P ≤ 0.001). Post hoc analysis. Cariprazine demonstrated specific antihostility/irritability and anti-agitation effects in patients with manic/mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder and baseline hostility, irritability, or agitation. • Hostility and irritability are considered core manic features in bipolar I disorder. • Hostility measures were assessed in cariprazine-treated patients with bipolar I mania. • Improvement in hostility was significantly greater for cariprazine versus placebo. • Antihostility effects were independent of manic symptom change, sedation, akathisia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cariprazine treats acute manic and depressive episodes in bipolar I disorder (BP‐I), but its efficacy in preventing relapse of mood episode remains unknown. Methods: In this phase 3b, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, patients with BP‐I with acute manic or depressive episodes (each with/without mixed features), were treated with cariprazine 3.0 mg/day during a 16‐week open‐label treatment period; those who achieved stable remission within 8 weeks and remained stable for at least another 8 weeks were randomized to receive cariprazine 1.5 or 3.0 mg per day or placebo in the double‐blind treatment period for up to 39 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to relapse of any mood episode. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Results: Patients (440/896) enrolled in the open‐label treatment period achieved stability criteria and were randomized to receive cariprazine 3.0 mg/day (n = 148), cariprazine 1.5 mg/day (n = 147), or placebo (n = 145) in the double‐blind treatment period. Relapse rates were 17.9%, 16.8%, and 19.7% in the cariprazine 3.0 mg/day, cariprazine 1.5 mg/day, and placebo groups, respectively. Neither dose of cariprazine was more effective than placebo on the primary outcome (3.0 mg/day: HR = 0.89, [95% CI: 0.5, 1.5]; 1.5 mg/day: HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.5, 1.4]). The most frequently reported AEs (≥5%) were akathisia, headache, insomnia, and nausea in the open‐label treatment period and increased weight and insomnia in the double‐blind treatment period. In the open‐label and double‐blind treatment periods, 7.5% and 1.6% of patients experienced an AE leading to discontinuation. Conclusion: Cariprazine was not superior to placebo in the prevention of relapses in this study. Relapse rates were unusually low in the placebo group. Cariprazine was well‐tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Cariprazine is an atypical dopamine receptor partial agonist antipsychotic available in the form of capsules. Although capsules are one of the most desirable routes of administration, there are certain situations (e. g., in an acute psychiatric setting, or when swallowing difficulties, or liquid shortages are present) when they cannot be administered. Therefore, alternative solutions like orodispersible tablets are needed. This study aimed to investigate the bioequivalence of a newly developed orodispersible tablet to the commercially available hard gelatine capsule of cariprazine 1.5 mg. Methods This was a phase I, open-label, randomized, single-dose bioequivalence study. It had a 2-period, 2-sequence, cross-over design, where each subject received one test and one reference product in a randomized sequence, separated by a wash-out period of 55 days. Blood sampling was performed over 72 h after dosing. Cariprazine concentrations were analyzed by a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. Standard bioequivalence statistics was applied to PK parameters calculated by non-compartmental analysis. Safety measures were analyzed descriptively. Result Pharmacokinetic data of 43 healthy volunteers and safety data of 54 subjects was analyzed. Cariprazine AUC0–72h and Cmax geometric mean ratios were 117.76% and 100.88%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals were within the pre-defined bioequivalence acceptance limits of 80.00% – 125.00%. Safety data was in line with the Summary of Product Characteristics of Cariprazine. Discussion The result of this clinical trial proved the bioequivalence of the new orodispersible tablet formulation when compared to hard gelatine capsules, enabling an alternative option for treatment of those suffering from schizophrenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data on reproductive safety of recently approved newer antipsychotics are limited. Here, we report a case vignette of a patient with schizophrenia treated with cariprazine during pregnancy. The patient became pregnant unexpectedly while taking medication. As a result of shared decision-making, the patient and her psychiatrist decided to continue the treatment, which proved to be protective against relapse and had no adverse effect either on the course of pregnancy or on the health of the newborn. Cariprazine maintenance treatment during pregnancy was found to be safe in our case. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Until the late 1800s, drug development was a chance finding based on observations and repeated trials and errors. Today, drug development must go through many iterations and tests to ensure it is safe, potent, and effective. This process is a long and costly endeavor, with many pitfalls and hurdles. The aim of the present review article is to explore what is needed for a molecule to move from the researcher bench to the patients' bedside, presented from an industry perspective through the development program of cariprazine. Cariprazine is a relatively novel antipsychotic medication, approved for the treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar mania, bipolar depression, and major depression as an add-on. It is a D3-preferring D3-D2 partial agonist with the highest binding to the D3 receptors compared to all other antipsychotics. Based on the example of cariprazine, there are several key factors that are needed for a molecule to move from the researcher bench to the patients' bedside, such as targeting an unmet medical need, having a novel mechanism of action, and a smart implementation of development plans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cariprazine, a third-generation antipsychotic (TGAs), has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia with good tolerability profile. Actual real-world literature data are lacking, particularly when exploring its efficacy in the long term. The present study examined the effects of cariprazine treatment on specific psychopathological domains with a particular focus on outcomes and side effects in real-life experience, after a longterm treatment. Methods: The present 12-month longitudinal naturalistic study included a sample of subjects with a DSM-5-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia, recruited in the outpatients' psychiatric services of university and community hospitals in Italy, naturally treated with cariprazine. The assessments included: a sociodemographic data sheet, the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 (SCID-5), the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) and the St. Hans Rating Scale (SHRS). The PANSS was also administered after 6 (T1) and 12 (T2) months of treatment with cariprazine while the SHRS at T1. Results: The total sample consisted of 31 patients, 15 males and 16 females. A significant decrease of the PANSS' subscales, Marder factors and total mean scores emerged at both T1 and T2 with respect to T0. Extrapyramidal symptoms occurred in a minority of patients and in mild or mild/moderate forms: no patient showed moderate forms of psychic/motor akathisia or dystonia, three subjects showed moderate parkinsonism. Conclusions: This study confirms a good efficacy profile of cariprazine in both positive and negative symptoms in patients with Schizophrenia, combined with a good tolerability profile in extrapyramidal symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is among the most prevalent psychiatric conditions and a leading cause of disability worldwide. MDD presents a diverse range of symptoms that significantly impact personal, societal, and economic dimensions. Despite the availability of numerous antidepressant treatments (ADTs) targeting different molecular mechanisms, a substantial proportion of patients experience inadequate response, presenting a considerable challenge in MDD management. As a result, adjunctive strategies, particularly involving atypical antipsychotics, are often employed to enhance treatment efficacy. Cariprazine, a D2/D3 partial agonist, is distinguished from other atypical antipsychotics by its selective action on the D3 receptor and its modulation of 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, and alpha 1B receptors. This distinctive pharmacological profile warrants investigation into its potential effectiveness and tolerability across various symptom domains of MDD, including pleasure, interest, and motivation; mood and suicidality; sleep and appetite; fatigue; psychomotor activity and anxiety; and cognitive function. Preliminary evidence from animal studies and clinical trials suggests that cariprazine may improve motivation, anhedonia, and cognitive function symptoms. Cariprazine shows promise in alleviating mood-related symptoms, though its impact on anxiety and its effects on agitation and psychomotor retardation remains uncertain. Cariprazine may be particularly beneficial for patients with MDD exhibiting anhedonia, cognitive deficits, and possibly fatigue and hypersomnia. Evaluating cariprazine’s efficacy across these symptom domains could reveal patterns that support more personalized treatment approaches for depression. Further research is essential to elucidate the role of cariprazine as an adjunctive therapy for adults with major depressive disorder who have an inadequate response to antidepressant monotherapy.

Management of negative symptoms is one of the most challenging and important unmet needs of schizophrenia treatment. Negative symptoms together with positive symptoms result in significant psychosocial impairment and poor quality of life. Existing studies on atypical antipsychotics reported limited treatment adherence due to higher prevalence of treatment-emergent adverse events, such as diabetes, weight gain, hyperlipidemia, hyperprolactinemia and hypertension. A compound with greater affinity for dopamine D2/D3 receptors may improve negative symptoms, mood, and cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. In 2015, the US FDA has approved cariprazine, a partial D2/D3 agonist for treatment of schizophrenia, mania or mixed episodes. Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, UK (2019) has particularly suggested cariprazine for the treatment of predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia. India's Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) has approved cariprazine in 2021 for the treatment of schizophrenia, manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. A ten-fold greater affinity for D3 receptors and partial agonism to serotonin receptors, along with longer half-lifemake cariprazine distinct when compared with other atypical antipsychotics. Cariprazine is also reported to have fewer incidents of metabolic and hormonal adverse events, and has been shown to provide better relapse prevention. Recent evidence indicates promising effect of cariprazine in ameliorating negative symptoms as well as psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. In addition, improved adherence to treatment (adjunctive/monotherapy) with cariprazine in patients having inadequate response to an ongoing antipsychotic treatment has also been clinically established. This review presents the evidence-based safety and efficacy of cariprazine for treatment of predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cariprazine has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating bipolar depression and as an adjunctive treatment for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). However, it remains unclear about its pharmacological efficacy in treating MDD. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the adjunctive use of cariprazine in MDD. Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of cariprazine in patients with MDD up to November 15, 2023. The changes in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score and incidence of adverse events (AEs), which represents of efficacy and tolerability, are considered as the main outcomes. A total of 3066 patients with MDD included in all across 5 RCTs. With regard to MADRS score, cariprazine group showed better results than control group (SMD = −0.12, 95% CI -0.19 to −0.04, P = 0.002, 5 RCTs, n = 3066). Cariprazine, meanwhile, improved the MADRS response (RR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.31, P = 0.0004, 5 RCTs, n = 3066). For safety outcomes, statistical difference was observed in AEs (RR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.35, P < 0.00001, 5 RCTs, n = 3077). The suicide ideation and SAEs showed no statistical difference between two groups. Cariprazine demonstrated antidepressant effect as an augmentation therapy in treating MDD. Meanwhile, the tolerability of it was acceptable as an adjunctive treatment. However, studies with larger sample sizes are still needed to explore the optimal dosage. • Cariprazine had significant efficacy when used as an adjunctive therapy to patients with major depressive disorder. • AEs with cariprazine as ADT adjunct are acceptable, unlikely to harm mental or physical health significantly. • By employing Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA), we confirmed the reliability of the antidepressant effect of cariprazine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness and is most commonly observed/ encountered by the majority of clinicians during their clinical practice Among numerous treatment methods, Cariprazine, and its related drugs have shown their clinical efficacy in the treatment of Schizophrenia. Cariprazine is one of the dopamine D3 – preferring the D3/D2 receptor partial agonist, which is indicated for the treatment of individuals suffering from Schizophrenia. It is a partial agonist of the dopamine receptors which has turned out to show efficacious results for the treatment of Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Mixed and Manic Disorders, and Major Depressive Disorders. This narrative summarises the pharmacological action of the Cariprazine treatment of Schizophrenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Comorbid substance use disorder (SUD) in patients with schizophrenia (dual disorder, DD) is a frequent occurrence in the psychiatric clinical practice and is positively associated with poorer outcomes. Despite a very high co-prevalence, clinical guidelines for SUD and severe mental illnesses tend to give limited consideration to co-existing disorders regarding diagnosis and management. This article is the result of a meeting held in February 2023 to discuss common challenges and best clinical practice initiatives for patients with schizophrenia and DD in different treatment settings. The authors identified issues in the clinical approach to DD in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and suggested the most suitable management based on their experience as a group of experts, identifying possible improvement areas. In conclusion, the panel recommends that individuals with DD should be cared for in a single center. Pharmacologic treatment in individuals with DD needing both control of symptoms related to schizophrenia spectrum disorders and substance withdrawal should ideally be based on using a non-sedative antipsychotic with anti- craving activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of a new psychopharmaceutical medication instead of the previous one always poses a certain challenge. In the case of antipsychotics (AP), these problems are considerably more complicated and are mainly caused by the question of dose equivalents, but also by the pharmacokinetic properties of the drug. In the case of partial dopamine D2 agonists, an additional issue is the possibility of deterioration when switching from the previous D2 antagonists to these drugs. Cross-titration is therefore generally recommended. Finally, due to the capsule form, it is not possible to increase the dose of cariprazine by less than 1.5 mg during titration. In this paper, we have presented our proposal to replace the most commonly used second-generation APs with the third-generation AP cariprazine. We have taken into account the dose equivalents, the pharmacological forms of the drugs and their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

The task of a psychiatrist is to select the most appropriate medication or combination of drugs to treat the symptoms of schizophrenia while minimizing the risk of side effects and ensuring the patient achieves the highest level of functioning possible. This is a challenging task as the action of each drug or group of drugs is different. The efficacy of cariprazine, which affects D3 receptors as a D3/D2 receptor partial agonist, has been extensively studied and is one of the first medication choices by practicing psychiatrists when treating patients with negative symptomatology. In this clinical case, we demonstrate the effective and safe treatment of a patient’s positive and affective symptoms using a combination of cariprazine, clozapine, and venlafaxine.

BackgroundEmotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD) is debilitating psychiatric disorder, particularly common in female and forensic populations. However, appropriate pharmacological treatment to effectively manage symptoms of EUPD remains an unmet clinical need. Dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs), such as aripiprazole, have a favourable tolerability profile and have demonstrated some benefits in targeting symptoms of emotional dysregulation, although, evidence regarding the effects of novel D2/D3 DRPA cariprazine in EUPD patients has been limited.ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of cariprazine for EUPD in a case series of female forensic inpatients where the diagnosis is more prevalent.MethodsDemographic and clinical information of the patients were collected from patient electronic records during their admission in a specialized NHS forensic service. Treatment response was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at baseline, 3 and 6 months and Global Clinical Impression Scale (CGI-scores) at baseline and 6 months. Tolerability and BMI, ECG QTc interval and prolactin levels were recorded prior to initiation and at 6 months.ResultsEight female patients with EUPD (mean age 29.8 years, SD 5.3) were treated with cariprazine (range 3–6mg). Total CGI-scores modestly improved from 5.6 baseline to 5.0 at 6 months. There was a reduction in mean total PANSS scores from baseline to 6 months (92.5, SD 8.1 to 72.4, SD 15.8), general psychopathology (56.1 SD 6.7 to 42.5, SD9.7), positive (21.9 SD 4.6 to 17.1, SD4.8) and negative PANSS scores (14.5 SD 6.3 to 12.8, SD4.6), corresponding to a 21%, 23%, 20% and 3% mean score reduction, respectively. Cariprazine demonstrated a favourable metabolic and hormonal side effect profile with no treatment discontinuation at 6 months follow up.ConclusionThis is the first case series to evaluate the effectiveness of cariprazine in EUPD. Its efficacy in improving PANSS and CGI-S scores was overall modest and highly variable, reflective of an inherently heterogenous and comorbid patient sample but the benefits on treatment perseverance and tolerability were considerable. Cariprazine may be of particular benefit in EUPD where psychotic symptoms are co-morbid, as an augmentation strategy to clozapine, or where previous antipsychotics have caused metabolic or hormonal side effects.

Data on reproductive safety of recently approved newer antipsychotics are limited. Here, we report a case vignette of a patient with schizophrenia treated with cariprazine during pregnancy. The patient became pregnant unexpectedly while taking medication. As a result of shared decision-making, the patient and her psychiatrist decided to continue the treatment, which proved to be protective against relapse and had no adverse effect either on the course of pregnancy or on the health of the newborn. Cariprazine maintenance treatment during pregnancy was found to be safe in our case.

Abstract Background Huntington’s disease (HD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease, characterised by motor disturbances and non-motor (i.e., psychiatric) symptoms. Motor symptoms are the hallmark features of HD and take many forms. Their emergence is related to alterations in striatal dopaminergic neurotransmission: dopamine levels increase in the early stages of the disease, while more advanced stages are characterised by reduced dopamine levels. Such a biphasic change potentially explains the alterations in motor symptoms: increased dopamine-production induces hyperkinetic movements early in the disease course, while depleted dopamine storage leads to hypokinetic symptoms in the advanced phase. Dopamine D2-D3 partial agonists could be a promising treatment option in HD, as they have the potential to either elevate or lower the surrounding dopamine levels if the levels are too low or too high, respectively, potentially offering symptom-relief across the illness-course. Therefore, the present study aimed at exploring the effects of cariprazine, a dopamine D2-D3 partial agonist with high affinity to D3 receptors, on motor symptoms associated with HD. Methods This was a single-centre, retrospective study where sixteen patients received off-label cariprazine treatment for 12 weeks (1.5-3 mg/day). Motor symptoms were evaluated using the Motor Assessment of the Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale. Least Square (LS) Mean Changes from Baseline (BL) to Week 8 and Week 12 in the Total Motor Score (TMS) were analysed using the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures method. In addition, improvement from BL to Week 8 and 12 was calculated for all motor items. Results Data of 16 patients were collected, but data of only 15 patients were analysed as one patient dropped out due to non-compliance. Significant changes were observed from BL to Week 8 (LS Mean Change: -9.4, p

This case report was conducted by searching for the following keywords on PubMed: High Functioning Autism, Autism Spectrum Disorder, cariprazine, aripiprazole, partial agonist antipsychotic, DRD2/DRD3. High Functioning Autism (HFA) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with average intellectual abilities, behavioral symptoms such as irritability, hyperactivity, aggressiveness and mood symptoms. HFA is not a term used in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders (DSM), but it is commonly used to identify patients diagnosed with Autistic Disorder (AD) or Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS) with average or above average intellectual abilities. Several factors are involved in HFA development, including environmental and genetic factors. In particular, over the last several decades, dopaminergic signaling system dysfunction has been highlighted as being responsible for behavioral patterns. Nowadays, symptoms of ASD lack a specific pharmacological treatment. The only medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for symptoms associated with ASD, in particular the irritability, are risperidone and aripiprazole. According to the hypothesis that dopamine receptor DRD2 and DRD3 might be involved in impulsive behavior, stereotypy, repetitive behaviors and language impairment, cariprazine could be a therapeutic option. This molecule is primarily characterized by DRD3 partial agonism and serotonin 5-HT1A partial agonism, with a lower ability to activate DRD2 than other third-generation antipsychotics, such as aripiprazole. We have reported here a case study of treatment of HFA with cariprazine.

Abstract Background Cariprazine is a third-generation antipsychotic with a unique mechanism of action. It functions as a partial agonist with high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors, an antagonist for 5-HT2A (moderate affinity) and 5-HT2B (high affinity) receptors. It binds to histamine H1 receptors and has a low affinity for 5-HT2C and alpha 1A-adrenergic receptors and no affinity for muscarinic (cholinergic) receptors. Among the troubling side effects, symptoms related to impulse control, such as hypersexuality, pathological gambling, compulsive shopping, compulsive eating etc., have been reported with the use of antipsychotic medications. However, no reports have been published regarding impulse control symptoms associated with cariprazine. We report a case of cariprazine-induced hypersexuality in a patient with schizophrenia, which was resolved by discontinuation of the medication. Case presentation A 67-year-old Caucasian woman with schizophrenia was admitted to the hospital inpatient unit after she discontinued olanzapine and psychotic symptoms reappeared. Prior to that, she was in remission, taking olanzapine for approximately one year. After discontinuation, she experienced auditory hallucinations with persecutory delusions and became anergic and withdrawn, with blunted affect. Olanzapine was reintroduced, as it was proven successful in her past treatments. However, since there were no changes, especially in negative symptoms, cariprazine was added. Seven days after the introduction of cariprazine, the patient developed compulsive sexual behaviour. Therefore, cariprazine was discontinued, and the hypersexual behaviour was resolved. Conclusions In this case report, we describe hypersexual behaviour that could potentially be induced by cariprazine. As a single case study, conclusions cannot be drawn. Controlled studies are warranted to better determine causality and the significance of this possible side-effect of cariprazine.

This study aims to analyze the adverse events (AEs) of Cariprazine based on the FAERS database, providing evidence for its safety surveillance. For signal quantification of Cariprazine-related AEs, we used disproportionality analysis including the Ratio of Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) algorithms. We selected Cariprazine-related AE reports from the FAERS database from the fourth quarter of 2015 to the first quarter of 2023, and performed a detailed data analysis. Out of a total of 12,278,580 case reports, 3659 were found to be directly related to Cariprazine. We identified 140 Preferred Terms (PT) to describe these AEs, finding that they involved 27 organ systems. Specifically, AEs related to eye disorders such as Cataract cortical, Cataract nuclear, Accommodation disorder, Lenticular opacities, Oculogyric crisis, Dyschromatopsia were not explicitly mentioned in the drug's leaflet, indicating the presence of new ADR signals. Analysis of the FAERS database identified AEs associated with Cariprazine, notably in eye disorders not previously documented in the drug's official leaflet. These findings emphasize the need for continuous post-market surveillance and awareness among healthcare professionals regarding potential new ADR signals. • 3,659 case reports in the FAERS database were identified as directly related to Cariprazine use. • Adverse events pertaining to specific eye disorders, including Cataract cortical, Cataract nuclear, and others, were discovered. • The findings underscore the importance of ongoing post-market surveillance to detect potential new ADEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This narrative review explores the efficacy and tolerability of third-generation antipsychotics (TGAs)—aripiprazole, cariprazine, brexpiprazole, and lurasidone—for the management of substance-induced psychosis (SIP). SIP is a psychiatric condition triggered by substance misuse or withdrawal, characterized by unique features distinct from those of primary psychotic disorders. These distinctive features include a heightened prevalence of positive symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, in addition to a spectrum of mood and cognitive disturbances. This review comprehensively investigates various substances, such as cannabinoids, cocaine, amphetamines, and LSD, which exhibit a greater propensity for inducing psychosis. TGAs exhibit substantial promise in addressing both psychotic symptoms and issues related to substance misuse. This review elucidates the distinctive pharmacological properties of each TGA, their intricate interactions with neurotransmitters, and their potential utility in the treatment of SIP. We advocate for further research to delineate the long-term effects of TGAs in this context and underscore the necessity for adopting an integrated approach that combines pharmacological and psychological interventions. Our findings underscore the intricate and multifaceted nature of treating SIP, highlighting the potential role of TGAs within therapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present a male patient carrying a pathogenic MECP2 p. Arg179Trp variant with predominant negative psychiatric features and multilevel evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction who responded to the cariprazine treatment. He had delayed speech development and later experienced severe social anxiety, learning disabilities, cognitive slowing, and predominant negative psychiatric symptoms associated with rigidity. Clinical examinations showed multisystemic involvement. Together with elevated ergometric lactate levels, the clinical picture suggested mitochondrial disease, which was also supported by muscle histopathology. Exploratory transcriptome analysis also revealed the involvement of metabolic and oxidative phosphorylation pathways. Whole-exome sequencing identified a pathogenic MECP2 variant, which can explain both the dopamine imbalance and mitochondrial dysfunction in this patient. Mitochondrial dysfunction was previously suggested in classical Rett syndrome, and we detected related phenotype evidence on multiple consistent levels for the first time in a MECP2 variant carriermale. This study further supports the importance of theMECP2 gene in the mitochondrial pathways, which can open the gate for more personalized therapeutic interventions. Good cariprazine response highlights the role of dopamine dysfunction in the complex psychiatric symptoms of Rett syndrome. This can help identify the optimal treatment strategy from a transdiagnostic perspective instead of a classical diagnostic category. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Comorbidity of substance use disorder (SUD) with schizophrenia, referred to as dual disorder (DD), significantly increases morbidity and mortality compared to schizophrenia alone. A dopaminergic dysregulation seems to be a common pathophysiological basis of the comorbidity. This article reports the current evidence on the role of dopamine dysregulations in DD, the pharmacological profile of cariprazine, a partial agonist of D3 and D2 dopamine receptors, and first clinical observations that may support its usefulness in the therapy of DD. PubMed/MEDLINE was searched for the keywords 'cariprazine,' 'schizophrenia,' 'dual disorder,' 'dopamine,' and 'dopamine receptor.' Preclinical and clinical studies, and reviews published in English were retrieved. Although the management of DD remains challenging, and the evidence for pharmacologic treatments is still unsatisfactory, cariprazine may be a candidate medication in DD due to its unique mechanism of action. Preliminary clinical experiences suggest that cariprazine has both antipsychotic and anticraving properties and should be considered early in patients with DD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cariprazine is a third-generation antipsychotic with a unique mechanism of action. It functions as a partial agonist with high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors, an antagonist for 5-HT2A (moderate affinity) and 5-HT2B (high affinity) receptors. It binds to histamine H1 receptors and has a low affinity for 5-HT2C and alpha 1A-adrenergic receptors and no affinity for muscarinic (cholinergic) receptors. Among the troubling side effects, symptoms related to impulse control, such as hypersexuality, pathological gambling, compulsive shopping, compulsive eating etc., have been reported with the use of antipsychotic medications. However, no reports have been published regarding impulse control symptoms associated with cariprazine. We report a case of cariprazine-induced hypersexuality in a patient with schizophrenia, which was resolved by discontinuation of the medication. Case presentation: A 67-year-old Caucasian woman with schizophrenia was admitted to the hospital inpatient unit after she discontinued olanzapine and psychotic symptoms reappeared. Prior to that, she was in remission, taking olanzapine for approximately one year. After discontinuation, she experienced auditory hallucinations with persecutory delusions and became anergic and withdrawn, with blunted affect. Olanzapine was reintroduced, as it was proven successful in her past treatments. However, since there were no changes, especially in negative symptoms, cariprazine was added. Seven days after the introduction of cariprazine, the patient developed compulsive sexual behaviour. Therefore, cariprazine was discontinued, and the hypersexual behaviour was resolved. Conclusions: In this case report, we describe hypersexual behaviour that could potentially be induced by cariprazine. As a single case study, conclusions cannot be drawn. Controlled studies are warranted to better determine causality and the significance of this possible side-effect of cariprazine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Among individuals receiving an adequate pharmacological treatment for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), only 30% reach a full symptom recovery; the remaining 70% will experience either a pharmacological response without remission or no response at all thus configuring treatment resistant depression (TRD). After an inadequate response to an antidepressant, possible next step options include optimizing the dose of the current antidepressant, switching to a different antidepressant, combining antidepressants, or augmenting with a non-antidepressant medication. Augmentation strategies with the most evidence-based support include atypical antipsychotics (AAs). Few data are available in literature about switching to another antipsychotic when a first augmentation trial has failed. We present a case-series of patients with unipolar treatment resistant depression who were treated with a combination of antidepressant and low dose of cariprazine after failing to respond to a first augmentation with another AA. We report data about ten patients affected by unipolar depression, visited at the outpatients unit of Mental Health Department of ASL CN2 of Bra and NA1 of Napoli (Italy). All patients failed to respond to conventional antidepressant therapy. A low dose of AA (aripiprazole, risperidone or brexpiprazole) was added for one month to the ongoing antidepressant treatment without clinical improvement. A second augmentation trial was then made with cariprazine. Seven out of ten patients were responders at the end of period, of them 1 patient reached responder status by week 2. HAM-D mean scores decreased from 23.9 ± 3.9 (baseline) to 14.8 ± 5.3 (4 weeks). Cariprazine was well tolerated, no severe side effect was observed during the trial. Our sample of treatment resistant unipolar patients showed good response to augmentation with cariprazine. Failure to a first AA-augmentation trial does not preclude response to a second one. This preliminary result requires confirmation through more rigorous studies conducted over greater samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]