Search

India is currently experiencing a demographic and epidemiological transition characterized by an aging population and an increase in chronic diseases, resulting in a greater demand for home healthcare services. Despite the critical nature and expansion of this area, home healthcare delivery in India remains under-researched. There is a dearth of information about the services, providers and organizations that offer services at home. There are various concerns in the provision of home healthcare services. These relate to accessibility and availability, information on providers, regulatory issues, standards of care, costs, safety concerns, and grievance redressal mechanisms for providers and users, which are among the topics discussed in this article. The article concludes that there is a need to recognize the "home" as a place for providing healthcare and as a "workplace" of care providers, develop standardized processes and guidelines for delivering care for different conditions at home, adopt standard human resource practices in deployment of care providers, bring transparency in the calculation of the cost of services and regulation of costs, and establish grievance redressal mechanisms for users, providers, and organizations. Further research is recommended on aspects such as user and provider perspective, training and supervision of providers, and financing, accreditation, and quality of services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of HeilberufeSCIENCE is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of TSG: Tijdschrift Voor Gezondheidswetenschappen is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In late January 2020, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) was reported as an outbreak in Wuhan, China. Within 2 months it became a global pandemic. Patients with cancer are at highest risk for both contracting and suffering complications of its resultant disease, Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19). Healthcare systems across the world had to adapt quickly to mitigate this risk, while continuing to provide potentially lifesaving treatment to patients. Bringing care to the home through the use of telehealth, home based chemotherapy, and remote patient monitoring technologies can help minimize risk to the patient and healthcare workers without sacrificing quality of care delivered. These care models provide the right treatment, to the right patient, at the right time, in the right place. Whether these patient-centered models of care will continue to be embraced by key stakeholders after the pandemic remains uncertain.

In late January 2020, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) was reported as an outbreak in Wuhan, China. Within 2 months it became a global pandemic. Patients with cancer are at highest risk for both contracting and suffering complications of its resultant disease, Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19). Healthcare systems across the world had to adapt quickly to mitigate this risk, while continuing to provide potentially lifesaving treatment to patients. Bringing care to the home through the use of telehealth, home based chemotherapy, and remote patient monitoring technologies can help minimize risk to the patient and healthcare workers without sacrificing quality of care delivered. These care models provide the right treatment, to the right patient, at the right time, in the right place. Whether these patient-centered models of care will continue to be embraced by key stakeholders after the pandemic remains uncertain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aging populations have been positioned as a challenge to health and social service planning around the world, a situation even more pronounced in the case of persons with a diagnosis of dementia. While policy responses emphasize that care be provided for persons with dementia in home settings for as long as possible and that family carers be supported in the provision of this care, finding good ways to support families as they do the work of 'delaying institutionalization' has been challenging despite decades of intervention research intended to develop and evaluate interventions to support families. In this context of limited effectiveness it is useful to examine the assumptions informing research practices. Problematization is a method of literature analysis useful for clarifying and challenging assumptions informing a field of research in order to generate new approaches to research or new research questions. Our analysis suggests that although community-based intervention research has contributed significant knowledge about the kinds of things that might help families, there are limitations related to the dominant assumptions underlying the field. We highlight three areas for re-consideration: the overriding focus on caregiver–care recipient dyads, the under-determination of the object(s) of inquiry and the algorithmic nature of interventions themselves. Issues in these areas, we argue, arise from a commitment to homogeneity characteristic of biomedical models of disease that may need to be rethought in the face of consequential heterogeneity among research populations. That is, there is a mismatch between 'dementia' in the intervention research literature and 'dementia' in the life that is consequential for families living with these concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Many people over the age of 65 receive support from home care providers to enable them to continue to live at home. In the UK, local authorities (England, Wales and Scotland) and Health and Social Care Trusts (Northern Ireland) commission these support services. However, little is known about these arrangements.Objectives: To address this knowledge gap through identifying the lessons from research for commissioners of home care for older people.Method: A scoping review was undertaken to extrapolate the lessons from research for future practice. Searches were conducted in 2016/17 and the analysis was completed 2017/18. Electronic and manual searches of UK literature were undertaken using distinct terms to investigate the people, organisations and processes intrinsic to commissioning home care for older people.Findings: From a total of 1,819 papers and government reports, 22 met the inclusion criteria, indicative of a limited body of knowledge. A variety of research methods and designs were included with mixed methods most frequently used. Four lessons were identified relating to: the marketisation of home care; the future of care at home; promoting integration with local partners in commissioning home care; and areas for future research.Limitations: The focus on research evidence may have meant that potentially interesting insights to inform future commissioning strategies from conceptual articles were omitted from the review.Implications: Understanding the complexities of market management in commissioning home care for older people is still at an early stage of development. This review provides evidence to inform its future development of value to policy makers and practitioners.

Introduction: International policy is encouraging a re-design of health and social care services, including the use of social prescribing. Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, an Integrated Care Organisation in the UK, commissioned a voluntary sector ‘Wellbeing Coordination’ service as a key element of the wider care model. This case study seeks to understand how primary, acute, social, community and voluntary services are working together in a locality hub and the impact of wellbeing coordinators on service users’ well-being, use and cost of health and social care services Methods: A before-and-after study, supplemented with qualitative case studies, practitioner interviews/surveys, observations of multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings and service user/caregiver interactions. Applying an action-based participatory approach, findings were co-produced with stakeholders and members of the public by embedded researchers-in-residence. Quantitative service user data were collected on health and social well-being outcomes and frailty on referral and 12 weeks. Comprehensive activity and cost data were collected at 12 months pre- and post-referral. Results: Health outcomes and service activity data were collected on 49 participants receiving the wellbeing coordination programme. All person-reported outcomes showed statistically significant increases in mean change scores (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, Well-being Star™, Patient Activation Measure, Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale, Living well goals met). Qualitative case studies and observations highlighted key mechanisms of the intervention and the hub working. The impact on health and social care use and cost was more nuanced, with mean activity and cost increasing overall. Referrals from the Enhanced Intermediate Care MDTs (20/49) showed higher levels of use and cost. At locality hub level, the practitioner survey, observations and interview findings show an increase in vertical and horizontal organisational integration and high levels of staff-reported person-centeredness while embodying a strengths-based approach. Discussion: The study shows a positive impact on outcomes and mixed patterns regarding activity and cost. The findings indicate potential for more ‘down-stream’ and preventative work. The close links with the wider voluntary sector add to the hub offer in holding more complexity, providing access and continuity of care, and delivering holistic and personalised care in the right place and at the right time. Conclusion: Key elements of how the hub works indicate the importance of leadership, co-ordination, communication, colocation, and contracting that allows the nourishing of trusting relationships and crossing of organisational and professional boundaries. Lessons learned: Challenges included pooling resources, record sharing, information governance and engaging all stakeholders in a shared vision for a strengths-based, person-centred culture. Ownership and bottom up dynamics and formal and informal relationships between practitioners at all levels, including the community they work with, were key features for overcoming these. Limitations: Case studies and participatory research approaches may be considered lesser to experimental study designs. However, context is crucial to integrated care and extrapolating generalizable findings. Co-production and triangulating varying data sources helps studying and implementing complex system wide transformation. Suggestions for future research: The Researcher-in-Residence model could be rolled out across systems to facilitate learning, and to increase robustness of insights.

The European policy emphasis on providing informal care at home causes caregivers and home care professionals having more contact with each other, which makes it important for them to find satisfying ways to share care. Findings from the literature show that sharing care between caregivers and professionals can be improved. This study therefore examines to what degree and why caregivers' judgements on sharing care with home care professionals vary. To improve our understanding of social inequities in caregiving experiences, the study adopts an intersectional perspective. We investigate how personal and situational characteristics attached to care judgements are interwoven. Using data of the Netherlands Institute for Social Research, we conducted bivariate and multivariate linear regression analysis (N = 292). We combined four survey questions into a 1–4 scale on 'caregiver judgement' (α = 0.69) and used caregivers' personal (such as gender and health status) and situational characteristics (such as the care recipient's impairment and type of care) as determinants to discern whether these are related to the caregivers' judgement. Using a multiplicative approach, we also examined the relationship between mutually constituting factors of the caregivers' judgement. Adjusted for all characteristics, caregivers who provide care to a parent or child with a mental impairment and those aged between 45 and 64 years or with a paid job providing care to someone with a mental impairment are likely to judge sharing care more negatively. Also, men providing care with help from other caregivers and caregivers providing care because they like to do so who provide domestic help seem more likely to be less satisfied about sharing care. This knowledge is vital for professionals providing home care, because it clarifies differences in caregivers' experiences and hence induce knowledge how to pay special attention to those who may experience less satisfaction while sharing care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) provide the opportunity to bring interventional studies closer to participants in their homes or a suitable location closer to prospective participants, thus increasing participants' diversity, accrual, retention, health care, and research access. However, little is known about the burden of caring for cancer patients participating in DCTs. This article describes how DCTs might affect the caregivers of cancer patients. The points discussed include how technological challenges for those without adequate digital literacy can overburden participants and their caregivers at home, as well as managing and optimizing research logistics and safe handling of samples. In addition, the shift in labor from the study personnel to the participants and their caregivers in a bid to complete several study procedures on their own can increase the care burden, especially if not well incentivized. Therefore, it is important to accumulate evidence on ways to optimize DCTs, especially in the home environment, without increasing the burden on caregivers, who will be an integral part of the study team and support the research at home., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Previous research has shown how filial piety is strong among people of Iranian background and that traditional Iranian culture result in most families' preferring to care for their elderly (and sick) family members at home. While acknowledging this, this article highlights what living in diaspora could mean in terms of cultural adaption and changing family values. By interviewing people with Iranian background living in Sweden (n = 20), whom all have been former primary caregivers to a relative living with dementia, we are able to show how the decision to cease caregiving at home is taken, and what underlying factors form the basis for such decision. Results indicate that although the existence of a Persian profiled dementia care facility is crucial in the making of the decision, it is the feeling of 'sheer exhaustion' that is the main factor for ceasing care at home. And, we argue, the ability to make such a decision based upon 'being too tired' must be understood in relation to transition processes and changes in lifestyle having an affect upon cultural values in relation to filial piety. Because, at the same time the changes on cultural values might not change accordingly among the elderly who are the ones moving into residential care, resulting in them quite often being left out of the actual decision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims The aim of this study was to provide deep insights into the pain associated with pressure injuries in home-dwelling individuals using narrative accounts. Background Pressure injuries or pressure ulcers are burdensome and costly. Prevalence data, surveys and systematic reviews demonstrate that pain associated with pressure injury is widespread, but voices of home-dwelling patients have remained largely unheard. Design Concurrent mixed methods case study of a UK community of approximately 50,000 adults. Methods Qualitative interviews, conducted in 2016, of 12 home-dwelling adult participants with a current pressure injury ( n = 10), or a recently healed pressure injury ( n = 2). Findings Pain had an adverse impact on activities of daily living, mobility and sleep. Participants described days that were clouded in pain; a pain they felt was poorly understood and often out of control. Thematic content analysis revealed two major themes; these are: Poorly controlled pain: 'I just want the pain to go away'; and, Uncertainty for the future: 'it almost seems insurmountable.' Conclusion Findings of our study support the need to develop an appropriate assessment tool for pressure injury patients in the community to enable healthcare professionals and patients to recognize and manage pressure injury-related pain effectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim To synthesize evidence to identify the components of effective psychosocial interventions in dementia care to inform clinical practice, policy and research. Background With population ageing, dementia represents a significant care challenge with 60% of people with dementia living at home. Design Overview of systematic reviews with narrative summary. Data sources Electronic searches of published systematic reviews in English using Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE and EPPI-Centre, between September 2013 - April 2014. Review methods Systematic reviews were appraised against Cochrane Collaboration levels of effectiveness. Components of psychosocial interventions were identified with their theoretical rationale. Findings were explored with a Patient, Public and Carer Involvement group. Results Thirty-six systematic reviews were included. From interventions, 14 components were identified, nine for people with dementia and five for carers, mostly undertaken in nursing/care homes. For people with dementia, there was evidence of effectiveness for cognitive stimulation and cognitive training, but less evidence for sensory stimulation, reminiscence, staff education, behavioural therapy and ADL training. For carers, there was evidence of effectiveness for education and training, psychotherapy and counselling. Conclusion There was a lack of definitive evidence of effectiveness for most psychosocial interventions. Further studies with stronger methodology or replication of existing studies would strengthen the evidence base. Few interventions were undertaken with people with dementia and their carers living at home. Further work will investigate the extent to which components identified here are present in models of home support for people with dementia and carers and their effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dementia is the most common neurological disorder worldwide and is a life-limiting condition, but very often is not recognised as such. People with dementia, and their carers, have been shown to have palliative care needs equal in extent to those of cancer patients. However, many people with advanced dementia are not routinely being assessed to determine their palliative care needs, and it is not clear why this is so. Main body: An interdisciplinary workshop on "Palliative Care in Neurodegeneration, with a focus on Dementia", was held in Cork, Ireland, in May 2016. The key aim of this workshop was to discuss the evidence base for palliative care for people with dementia, to identify 'gaps' for clinical research, and to make recommendations for interdisciplinary research practice. To lead the discussion throughout the day a multidisciplinary panel of expert speakers were brought together, including both researchers and clinicians from across Ireland and the UK. Targeted invitations were sent to attendees ensuring all key stakeholders were present to contribute to discussions. In total, 49 experts representing 17 different academic and practice settings, attended. Key topics for discussion were pre-selected based on previously identified research priorities (e.g. James Lind Alliance) and stakeholder input. Key discussion topics included: i. Advance Care Planning for people with Dementia; ii. Personhood in End-of-life Dementia care; iii. Topics in the care of advanced dementia at home. These topics were used as a starting point, and the ethos of the workshop was that the attendees could stimulate discussion and debate in any relevant area, not just the key topics, summarised under iv. Other priorities. Conclusions: The care experienced by people with dementia and their families has the potential to be improved; palliative care frameworks may have much to offer in this endeavour. However, a solid evidence base is required to translate palliative care into practice in the context of dementia. This paper presents suggested research priorities as a starting point to build this evidence base. An interdisciplinary approach to research and priority setting is essential to develop actionable knowledge in this area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Kakovostna Starost is the property of Anton Trstenjak Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The transition to motherhood starts early in pregnancy and is completed when the mother feels competent in caring for the infant. Becoming the mother of a child with disabilities is demanding as their needs are complex. The aim of the review was to appraise completed qualitative and quantitative reports on the challenges of mothers of children with disabilities regarding their own transition to motherhood. A review of the literature was carried out through, first, a computerized search strategy to identify relevant studies from selected databases and, second, quality appraisal and thematic analysis of selected studies. The transition to motherhood of children with disabilities takes place in the inside world at home, the outside world external to home and the ‘going-between’ world of travelling between the two worlds. The mothers are challenged at home to integrate basic infant care with technical care of their children. In the outside world they often struggled to ensure that their children got the necessary professional care. Travelling between their homes and healthcare services posed many problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This paper synthesises research evidence about the effectiveness of services intended to support and sustain people with dementia to live at home, including supporting carers. The review was commissioned to support an inspection regime and identifies the current state of scientific knowledge regarding appropriate and effective services in relation to a set of key outcomes derived from Scottish policy, inspection practice and standards. However, emphases on care at home and reduction in the use of institutional long term care are common to many international policy contexts and welfare regimes. Methods: Systematic searches of relevant electronic bibliographic databases crossing medical, psychological and social scientific literatures (CINAHL, IngentaConnect, Medline, ProQuest, PsychINFO and Web of Science) in November 2012 were followed by structured review and full-text evaluation processes, the latter using methodology-appropriate quality assessment criteria drawing on established protocols. Results: Of 131 publications evaluated, 56 were assessed to be of 'high' quality, 62 of 'medium' quality and 13 of 'low' quality. Evaluations identified weaknesses in many published accounts of research, including lack of methodological detail and failure to evidence conclusions. Thematic analysis revealed multiple gaps in the evidence base, including in relation to take-up and use of self-directed support by people with dementia, use of rapid response teams and other multidisciplinary approaches, use of technology to support community-dwelling people with dementia, and support for people without access to unpaid or informal support. Conclusions: In many areas, policy and practice developments are proceeding on a limited evidence base. Key issues affecting substantial numbers of existing studies include: poorly designed and overly narrowly focused studies; variability and uncertainty in outcome measurement; lack of focus on the perspectives of people with dementia and supporters; and failure to understanding the complexities of living with dementia, and of the kinds of multifactorial interventions needed to provide holistic and effective support. Weaknesses in the evidence base present challenges both to practitioners looking for guidance on how best to design and deliver evidence-based services to support people living with dementia in the community and their carers and to those charged with the inspection of services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) can lead to serious disability in children and adolescents, requiring intensive home care usually provided by parents .These parents must also cope with physical, familial, social and financial constraints. The aim of this study is to evaluate the positive and negative impacts of caregiving on parents to children with JIA, and identify diseases-related variables that affect these outcomes. Methods Cross-sectional study including 47 patients diagnosed with JIA defined by the International League of association for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2001 classification. Socio-demographic, clinical and biological data related to patient and disease were collected. Positive and negative effects of caregiving on parents of children with JIA were assessed via a validated instrument; the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA).The CRA assesses parent's selfesteem, financial problems, health problems, disrupted schedule and lack of family support. All parents completed the CRA questionnaire. A statistical analysis was conducted to determine the influence of disease-related variables on caregivers. Results Forty-seven patients were included with 40.4% female. The average patient age was 11 years, and a mean patient body mass index (BMI) was 18. Forty patients were in school. Median disease duration of JIA was 4 years. The most frequent arthritis subtype was persistent oligoarthritis in 12-patients. Nearly 15% had extra-articular manifestations most frequently ocular involvement (6.4%). Median of global Visual analogic scale (VAS) was 20 and median Child health assessment questionnaire (CHAQ) was 0. The primary caregiver was the mother for all patients. Mean maternal age was 38 years, 42% of mothers were illiterate, and nearly all (95%) were without employment. The mean values of different dimensions of the CRA were respectively: self-esteem 3.5, financial problems 3.7, health problem 2.4, disrupted schedule 3.6 and familial support 2.9. Disrupted schedule of parents was correlated with disease severity assessed by physician VAS (p = 0.02). Financial problems of parents were significantly associated with disease duration (p = 0.04). There was no significant association between the type of JIA, activity or severity of the disease and other dimensions of the CRA. Conclusion This study suggests that the management of children with JIA has a high negative impact among caregiving parents, represented mainly by the disruption of their activities, the lack of family support, financial problems and health problems. However, caregiving often also improves caregiver's self-esteem (feeling of gratification to be helping). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim To evaluate the experience of nursing respite care in families caring for children with complex health needs. Method Seven mothers took part in semi-structured, in-depth interviews, which were taped, transcribed and coded. Results were categorised thematically. Findings Families described a positive impact on all aspects of life, the high value of respite care and the preference for more information, flexibility, choice and co-ordination of the different services. Conclusion Respite care is highly beneficial to family life, but there need to be clearer communication lines and a stable, flexible and adequately resourced workforce. Families value a single point of contact and would prefer more respite care to be available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Children's attendance at emergency departments (EDs) is increasing every year, yet many children present with minor, self-limiting illnesses that could be managed at home. In light of Williams et al (2009) suggestion that healthcare professionals should improve the care available to patients at point of contact rather than try to change their health-seeking behaviours, this article describes how Tameside and Glossop Primary Care Trust has developed an advanced paediatric nurse practitioner (APNP) service in the ED to improve the care of children, and to reduce the number of admissions. The APNPs treat children in the ED then divert them to more appropriate services where support is given to the families to care for their children at home. The role contributes to meeting ED clinical quality indicators, frees up medical staff to deal with more seriously ill patients, and makes financial savings for the trust. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the fundamental problems facing providers and commissioners of health services is how to maintain the skills and knowledge of the workforce during the initial development and implementation of home care services. This small-scale project sought to ascertain if it was possible to use human patient simulation scenarios to educate community nurses about how to recognize when care at home is appropriate and when it is not. A series of scenarios were developed and delivered to small groups of community nursing staff. A total of 18 qualified nurses took part in the project. Participants were asked to report their level of confidence in the diagnosis, management and recognition of patient deterioration for each of the scenarios prior to and after the session. The results show increased confidence across all participants in each of the scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An increase in the ageing UK population is leading to new ways of looking at how we deliver health and social care services in the UK. The use of assisted living technology (ALT) and telecare is already playing a part in these new models of care. Yet despite the current advances in the range of technology and networking capabilities in the home, ALT and telecare solutions have not been taken up as eagerly as might have been anticipated. The study reported here used scenario-based focus groups with a wide variety of stakeholders in home care to identify the existing barriers to the successful uptake of ALTs and telecare in Scotland. Six focus group sessions were conducted with individual stakeholder groups (social care workers, policy makers, telecare installation technicians, older users, informal carers) and five conducted with mixed stakeholder groups. The focus groups used the same home care scenario to identify and categorise the different perceptions, attitudes, and expectations of the various stakeholders when discussing telecare implementation for a fictitious older couple. The emerging themes from the focus groups were analysed and categorised according to the Framework Analysis approach. We present a synthesised list of the current barriers to the uptake of ALTs and telecare - and discuss how each of these barriers might be overcome. If these barriers are addressed, we believe telehealthcare technologies will be better designed, more usable, easier to prescribe effectively, more acceptable to more users in more contexts, and ultimately more common place in homes throughout the UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Even though palliative care of dementia and care at home are key NHS priorities, services that set out specifically to support palliative care of dementia at home are virtually non-existent. We studied a novel service that has supported many people with advanced dementia at home through till death. Key factors for success include the right equipment, expertise around relevant medication, food, and social care needs, as well as understanding and support for funding care commissioning and informal care. The study revealed blockages to accessing support as a result of poor understanding of the needs of advanced dementia care as well as organizational prejudice. We demonstrate that good, home based palliative care of dementia can be achieved with very positive outcomes. Bereavement may be helped by the process of caring at home till death. Given that the Audit Commission has cited home care of advanced dementia as good value for money, it is of grave concern that services to support people with advanced dementia at home are not available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: International policy is encouraging a re-design of health and social care services, including the use of social prescribing. Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, an Integrated Care Organisation in the UK, commissioned a voluntary sector 'Wellbeing Coordination' service as a key element of the wider care model. This case study seeks to understand how primary, acute, social, community and voluntary services are working together in a locality hub and the impact of wellbeing coordinators on service users' well-being, use and cost of health and social care services Methods: A before-and-after study, supplemented with qualitative case studies, practitioner interviews/surveys, observations of multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings and service user/caregiver interactions. Applying an action-based participatory approach, findings were co-produced with stakeholders and members of the public by embedded researchers-inresidence. Quantitative service user data were collected on health and social well-being outcomes and frailty on referral and 12 weeks. Comprehensive activity and cost data were collected at 12 months pre- and post-referral. Results: Health outcomes and service activity data were collected on 49 participants receiving the wellbeing coordination programme. All person-reported outcomes showed statistically significant increases in mean change scores (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, Well-being Star?, Patient Activation Measure, Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale, Living well goals met). Qualitative case studies and observations highlighted key mechanisms of the intervention and the hub working. The impact on health and social care use and cost was more nuanced, with mean activity and cost increasing overall. Referrals from the Enhanced Intermediate Care MDTs (20/49) showed higher levels of use and cost. At locality hub level, the practitioner survey, observations and interview findings show an increase in vertical and horizontal organisational integration and high levels of staff-reported person-centeredness while embodying a strengths-based approach. Discussion: The study shows a positive impact on outcomes and mixed patterns regarding activity and cost. The findings indicate potential for more 'down-stream' and preventative work. The close links with the wider voluntary sector add to the hub offer in holding more complexity, providing access and continuity of care, and delivering holistic and personalised care in the right place and at the right time. Conclusion: Key elements of how the hub works indicate the importance of leadership, coordination, communication, colocation, and contracting that allows the nourishing of trusting relationships and crossing of organisational and professional boundaries. Lessons learned: Challenges included pooling resources, record sharing, information governance and engaging all stakeholders in a shared vision for a strengths-based, personcentred culture. Ownership and bottom up dynamics and formal and informal relationships between practitioners at all levels, including the community they work with, were key features for overcoming these. Limitations: Case studies and participatory research approaches may be considered lesser to experimental study designs. However, context is crucial to integrated care and extrapolating generalizable findings. Co-production and triangulating varying data sources helps studying and implementing complex system wide transformation. Suggestions for future research: The Researcher-in-Residence model could be rolled out across systems to facilitate learning, and to increase robustness of insights. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]