Search

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is a global health challenge that requires a multidisciplinary approach. Despite recent advances in pharmacological and interventional therapy, morbidity and mortality in these patients remain high. For this reason, and because of its interplay with other cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases, HF represents a major area of research, with new trials being published every year and international guidelines constantly updated., Areas Covered: The authors review the current status and possible future developments in HF pharmacotherapy., Expert Opinion: The treatment of HF has made significant advances in recent years, and the current recommendations are based on large outcome trials. This has led to significant reductions in both mortality and morbidity, but the death rate remains unacceptably high. In this context, a patient-centered approach that considers comorbidities and specific clinical scenarios when dosing HF medication is essential. Prevention of hospital admissions for cardiac decompensation is of utmost importance in patients with HF as is the enablement of activities of daily living, an endpoint which has only recently been incorporated into major HF trials.

Drug repurposing is defined as the use of approved therapeutic drugs for indications different from those for which they were originally designed. Repositioning diminishes both the time and cost for drug development by omitting the discovery stage, the analysis of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion routes, as well as the studies of the biochemical and physiological effects of a new compound. Besides, drug repurposing takes advantage of the increased bioinformatics knowledge and availability of big data biology. There are many examples of drugs with repurposed indications evaluated in in vitro studies, and in pharmacological, preclinical, or retrospective clinical analyses. Here, we briefly review some of the experimental strategies and technical advances that may improve translational research in cardiovascular diseases. We also describe exhaustive research from basic science to clinical studies that culminated in the final approval of new drugs and provide examples of successful drug repurposing in the field of cardiology., (© 2024 Deutsche Pharmazeutische Gesellschaft.)

Over the past decade, the field of heart failure (HF) has witnessed remarkable progress in drug development, resulting in the approval of numerous groundbreaking drugs by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. To address some of these challenges, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued guidance documents that have been critical in contemporary HF drug development; however, there are still many challenges in need of investigation. This paper leverages efforts of the Heart Failure Collaboratory and the scientific community to discuss the critical need for innovative trial designs, important concepts in clinical trials in the modern era, and the utilization of big data to accelerate HF drug development. At this inflection point in HF drug development, it is imperative that, as a global scientific community, we foster increased collaboration among researchers, clinicians, patients, and regulatory bodies. Only through such unified efforts can we navigate the complexities of HF, accelerate the development process, and ultimately deliver effective therapies that transform patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Januzzi has a board position with Imbria Pharma; has received grant support from Abbott, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BMS, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals; has received consulting income from Abbott Diagnostics, Beckman-Coulter, Jana Care, Janssen, Novartis, Prevencio, Quidel, and Roche Diagnostics; and has served on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, CVRx, Medtronic, Pfizer, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Lindenfeld has received consulting fees from Abbott, Adona, Axon, Alleviant, AstraZeneca, Boston Scienrific, CVRx, Cordio, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Merck, Orchestra Biomed, VWave, Whiteswell, and Vascular Dynamics; and has received grant funding from AstraZeneca and Volumetrix. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gossamer, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lilly, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, and US2.AI; and has consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, Akros, and Valo. Dr Bristow has been a consultant for ARCA Biopharma. Dr Abraham has received research grant support from the NHLBI (NIH 1 UG3/UH3 HL140144-01, 08/01/18-07/31/22, “Impact of Low Flow Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy on Hospital Readmission/Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure and Central Sleep Apnea [LOFT-HF]”); has received consulting income from Abbott Vascular, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Zoll Respicardia; has received speaker honoraria from Impulse Dynamics; and has received salary support from V-Wave Medical. Dr O'Connor has done consulting for Abiomed and Merck. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Older patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are particularly vulnerable to the efficacy and adverse drug reactions, and may therefore particularly benefit from personalized medication. Drug-gene interactions (DGIs) occur when an individual's genotype affects the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of a victim drug., Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of cardiovascular-related DGIs on the clinical efficacy and safety outcomes in older patients with CAD., Methods: Hospitalized older patients (≥ 65 years old) with CAD were consecutively recruited from August 2018 to May 2022. Eligible patients were genotyped for the actionable pharmacogenetic variants of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, and SLCO1B1, which had clinical annotations or implementation guidelines for cardiovascular drugs. Allele frequencies and DGIs were determined in the cohort for the 5 actionable PGx genes and the prescribed cardiovascular drugs. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. The influence of DGIs on the cardiovascular drug-related efficacy outcomes (all-cause mortality and/or major cardiovascular events, MACEs) and drug response phenotypes of "drug-stop" and "dose-decrease" were evaluated., Results: A total of 1,017 eligible older patients with CAD were included, among whom 63.2% were male, with an average age of 80.8 years old, and 87.6% were administrated with polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications). After genotyping, we found that 96.0% of the older patients with CAD patients had at least one allele of the 5 pharmacogenes associated with a therapeutic change, indicating a need for a therapeutic change in a mean of 1.32 drugs of the 19 cardiovascular-related drugs. We also identified that 79.5% of the patients had at least one DGI (range 0-6). The median follow-up interval was 39 months. Independent of age, negative association could be found between the number of DGIs and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.96, P = 0.008), and MACEs (adjusted HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98, P = 0.023), but positive association could be found between the number of DGIs and drug response phenotypes (adjusted OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05-1.45, P = 0.011) in the elderly patients with CAD., Conclusions: The association between cardiovascular DGIs and the clinical outcomes emphasized the necessity for the integration of genetic and clinical data to enhance the optimization of cardiovascular polypharmacy in older patients with CAD. The causal relationship between DGIs and the clinical outcomes should be established in the large scale prospectively designed cohort study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Sepsis, a life-threatening syndrome, is often accompanied by tachycardia in spite of hypovolemia and hypotension have been corrected. Recently, relevant studies have shown that sustained tachycardia in sepsis was related to high mortality, and appropriate control of heart rate (HR) could improve prognosis. Ivabradine reduces HR directly without a negative inotropic effect through inhibition of the I f ionic current, which is different from the traditional rate control drug (beta-blockers)., Methods and Analysis: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open label study designed to investigate the effect of heart rate control with ivabradine on hemodynamic in patients with sepsis. Our study will enroll 172 patients with sepsis as defined by The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria with sinus rate of 95 bpm or higher despite a hemodynamic optimization. Patients will be randomly assigned to standard treatment group (GS) or ivabradine group (GI, standard treatment for sepsis plus enteral ivabradine). Patients in GI will receive ivabradine to maintain HR between 70 and 94 bpm. The primary outcome is the difference of a reduction in HR below 95 bpm and the effect of ivabradine on hemodynamics between GI and GS group within the first 96 h after randomization. The secondary outcomes include organ function measures, the difference in SOFA score, incidence of adverse events, need for organ support, length of ICU stay, and 28-day overall mortality., Discussion: There are limited studies on ivabradine to control heart rate in patients with sepsis. Our study aims to evaluate whether direct sinus node inhibition can improve hemodynamics, as well as its impact on organ function and prognosis in patients with sepsis, so as to provide evidence for the safe usage in clinical practice., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05882708. Registered on May 11, 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05882708 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aims: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is characterized by the accumulation of transthyretin (TTR) protein in the myocardium. The aim of this scoping review is to provide a descriptive summary of the clinical trials and observational studies that evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of various agents used in ATTR-CM, with a goal of identifying the contemporary gaps in literature and to reveal future research opportunities., Methods and Results: The search was performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search using several databases for observational and clinical trials investigating the treatment modalities for ATTR-CM was undertaken. We extracted data including study characteristics, primary endpoints, and adverse events from each study. A total of 19 studies were included in our scoping review. Out of which, 8 were clinical trials and 11 were observational analyses. The drugs evaluated included tafamadis, acoramidis, revusiran, doxycycline and tauroursodeoxycholic acid and doxycycline, diflusinil, inotersan, eplontersen, and patisiran. Tafamidis has shown to be efficacious in the management of ATTR-CM, particularly when initiated at earlier stages. RNA interference and antisense oligonucleotide drugs have shown promising impacts on quality of life. Additionally, this review identified gaps in the literature, particularly among long-term outcomes, comparative effectiveness, and the translation of research into economic contexts., Conclusion: Multiple pharmacological options are potential disease-modifying therapies for ATTR-CM. However, many gaps exist in the understanding of these various drug therapies, warranting further research. The future directions for management of ATTR-CM are promising in regard to improving prognostic implications., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: The life-threatening diseases known as ACS (acute coronary syndrome) continue to produce considerable rates of morbidity and mortality despite breakthroughs in therapy. The study determined clinical outcome and its predictors in patients at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital (UOGCSH), North West Ethiopia., Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study design was employed at UOGCSH from January 31, 2018 to February 1, 2023. The hospital used a systematic random sampling procedure to select study participants from the medical records of patients in chronic cardiac follow-up clinics., Main Outcome Measures: Exposures were optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus non-optimal medical therapy collected from May to August 2023. Descriptive and analytical statistics were employed to compare study groups. A binary logistic regression model was employed to identify candidate variables for further analysis. Cox's proportional hazard model and log-rank test were employed, with a P-value < 0.05 used to evaluate statistical significance. A five-year all-cause mortality after discharge estimate was displayed by using Kaplan-Meier curves., Results: Among 422 patients with ACS [mean age, 61.56 (SD = 9.686) years; 54.7% male], of whom only 59.2% (250) received optimal medical therapy at discharge. Age ≥ 65, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney diseases, and cardiogenic shock were negative independent predictors of optimal medical therapy. On the other hand, male sex was independently associated with the use of optimal medical therapy. All-cause mortality occurred in 16.6% (n = 70) and major adverse cardiac events occurred in 30.8% (n = 130) of patients with a 95% CI of 0.132-0.205 and 0.264-0.355, respectively. Multivariate analyses indicated that OMT was significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.431, 95% CI: 0.222-0.835; P = 0.013)., Conclusion: This study revealed that the use of preventive OMT in patients discharged with acute coronary syndrome was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. However, the use of this OMT is suboptimal., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Updated guidelines for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and acute decompensation have improved outcomes, but ongoing efforts are focused on uncovering new evidence and developing novel therapies. This review examines the limitations of current treatments and the potential impact of emerging therapies., Areas Covered: A literature search focused on studies investigating drugs for HFrEF. We review recent clinical trials and emerging therapies to assess evidence strength, explore guideline updates, and identify strategies to optimize patient outcomes., Expert Opinion: The HFrEF treatment landscape is rapidly evolving, with advances in therapies like sodium/glucose cotransporter inhibitors and sacubitril-valsartan. Though managing acute decompensated heart failure remains challenging, recent trials suggest improvements in diuretic strategies and anti-inflammatory treatments. Ongoing research is essential for validating these therapies and incorporating them into standard practice.

Aim: Older patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are more likely to be excluded from clinical trials. This exclusion affects the quality of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention in this population., Methods: Baseline data from the Fukuoka Kidney Disease Registry (FKR) cohort, which included 4476 adult patients with CKD stages G1-G5, were cross-sectionally analyzed to compare the use of recommended drugs for preventing CVD in each age group., Results: Different prescribing patterns were observed according to age for the cardiovascular drug classes. Older patients with CKD were less likely to receive renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and were more likely to receive calcium channel blockers. The proportion of anticoagulation prescriptions for patients with CKD and atrial fibrillation decreased in the older age group (≥ 75 years). However, the proportion of antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischemic CVD increased linearly with age, even in the very old group aged ≥ 85 years. These findings suggest a severe cardiovascular burden in patients with CKD. Notably, RAS inhibitor use was avoided in the older group despite a severe cardiovascular burden, such as a high prevalence of CVD history and massive albuminuria ＞300 mg/g creatinine. This finding indicates that an older age independently contributed to the non-use of RAS inhibitors, even after adjusting for other covariates., Conclusions: This study suggests that age is a potential barrier to the treatment of patients with CKD and highlights the need to establish individualized treatment strategies for cardiovascular protection in this population.

Advances in understanding gene expression regulation through epigenetic mechanisms have contributed to elucidating the regulatory mechanisms of noncoding RNAs as pharmacological targets in several diseases. MicroRNAs (miRs) are a class of evolutionarily conserved, short, noncoding RNAs regulating in a concerted manner gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by targeting specific sequences of the 3'-untranslated region of mRNA. Conversely, mechanisms of cardiovascular disease (CVD) remain largely elusive due to their life-course origins, multifactorial pathophysiology, and co-morbidities. In this regard, CVD treatment with conventional medications results in therapeutic failure due to progressive resistance to monotherapy, which overlooks the multiple factors involved, and reduced adherence to poly-pharmacology approaches. Consequently, considering its role in regulating complete gene pathways, miR-based drugs have appreciably progressed into preclinical and clinical testing. This review summarizes the current knowledge about the mechanisms of miRs in cardiovascular disease, focusing specifically on describing how clinical chemistry and physics have improved the stability of the miR molecule. In addition, a comprehensive review of the main miRs involved in cardiovascular disease and the clinical trials in which these molecules are used as active pharmacological molecules is provided., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive disease associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events and elevated mortality rates. Symptoms of PAD, including claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia, impair functional capacity and lead to lower quality of life. The focus of current therapies is to minimize symptoms, improve quality of life, and reduce adverse cardiovascular and limb events. Among the medical therapies are antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antihypertensives, lipid lowering therapies, cilostazol and pentoxifylline, and novel blood sugar-lowering therapies, plus exercise therapy and smoking cessation. In this review, we discuss these evidence-based medical therapies that are available for patients with symptomatic PAD., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

For patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia (CLTI), endovascular approaches to revascularization are often employed as a component of multimodality care aimed at limb preservation. However, patients with CLTI are also prone to treatment failure, particularly following balloon angioplasty alone. Drug-coated devices utilizing Paclitaxel were developed to decrease restenosis but have been primarily studied in patients presenting with claudication. In recent years, data have emerged which describe the efficacy of drug-coated devices in the treatment of patients with CLTI. Concurrently, there has been major controversy surrounding the use of drug-coated devices in peripheral arterial disease. A historical narrative of the development and use of drug-coated devices for peripheral arterial disease is presented, along with discussion of major trials. Evidence argues that paclitaxel-based therapies for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) do not increase mortality risk compared to nondrug-coated devices. In CLTI patients, paclitaxel-based balloons and stents provide superior patency and freedom reintervention compared to nondrug-coated devices when treating femoropopliteal disease. However, the use of Paclitaxel-based therapies for below-the-knee (BTK) interventions has not been shown to provide clinically meaningful outcomes compared to nondrug-based therapies. Newer generation antiproliferative agents (Sirolimus, Everolimus) and delivery systems (bioabsorbable scaffolds) hold promise for BTK interventions with early data suggesting decreased rates of major amputation or major adverse limb events., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: Cardiovascular drug development requires synthesizing relevant literature about indications, mechanisms, biomarkers, and outcomes. This short study investigates the performance, cost, and prompt engineering trade-offs of 3 large language models accelerating the literature screening process for cardiovascular drug development applications., (© Jay G Ronquillo, Jamie Ye, Donal Gorman, Adina R Lemeshow, Stephen J Watt. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org).)

Background: The overall mortality and morbidity benefit in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction is greatest with a treatment combination of sacubitril/valsartan, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors, termed the "fantastic four" or "quadruple therapy." The addition of vericiguat (an oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator) is believed to aid in managing worsening heart failure after quadruple therapy. Among childhood and young adult cancer survivors, cardiovascular complications that develop more than 10 years after anthracycline-based chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Therefore, this study reports the efficacy of multidrug regimen based on quadruple therapy for worsening heart failure in cancer survivors with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy., Case Presentation: A survivor of cancer as a young adult who received high-dose anthracycline chemotherapy presented with acute decompensated heart failure 20 years post-chemotherapy and worsening heart failure 1.5 years after discharge. The patient showed signs of improvement after a step-wise introduction of carvedilol, empagliflozin, sacubitril/valsartan, ivabradine, and spironolactone for worsening heart failure. Vericiguat was accelerated owing to the risk of more severe cardiovascular events associated with ongoing aortic stenosis and the poor prognosis of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. Heart failure symptoms continued to improve, with significant cardiac reverse remodeling, and the patient successfully underwent aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis., Conclusions: Our case highlighted that multidrug treatment with add-on vericiguat and ivabradine based on quadruple therapy can potentially treat worsening heart failure in young adult cancer survivors with severe anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Women with breast cancer (BC) are at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). We examined adherence to CVD medications and their association with major CVD events over 14 years of follow-up in the Pathways Heart Study, a prospective study of 4,776 stage I-III BC patients diagnosed from 2005-2013., Methods: Eligibility included being alive 6 months post-BC diagnosis, with dyslipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes at diagnosis along with ≥1 prior outpatient order or dispensing for a statin, anti-hypertensive, or diabetes medication, respectively, in the 30 months prior. Medication adherence was measured from pharmacy data to calculate cumulative average adherence (CAA). Incident heart failure (HF), ischemic heart disease (IHD), and stroke were determined via validated diagnosis and procedure codes. Working marginal structural models (MSM) fitted with inverse probability weighting evaluated the effect of adherence regimens on the hazards for each CVD event, while controlling for baseline and time-varying confounders. MSM parameterizations included: 1) CAA<100% versus CAA = 100% (ref), 2) CAA<80% versus CAA≥80% (ref) and 3) CAA<80% versus 80%≤CAA<100% versus CAA = 100%., Results: Poor statin adherence (CAA<80%) was associated with higher risk of composite CVD (HR = 2.54; 95% CI: 1.09, 5.94) versus CAA≥80%. Poor statin adherence was also associated with a higher risk of stroke (HR = 8.13; 95% CI: 2.03, 32.51) but not risk of IHD and HF. Further, compared with perfect adherence (CAA = 100%), good adherence (80%≤CAA<100%) was associated with lower risk (HR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.92) while poor adherence (CAA<80%) was associated with higher risk of composite CVD (HR = 2.45; 95% CI: 1.05, 5.70). Levels of adherence to anti-hypertensives and diabetes medications had mixed or null associations with risk of CVD., Conclusions: Maintaining good adherence (≥80%) to statins after BC treatment is beneficial for cardiovascular health in patients with dyslipidemia. Future studies should determine factors associated with lower adherence to statins and ways to improve adherence., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Kwan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Medication poisoning, resulting from the ingestion of cardiotoxic drugs, presents a significant health issue. The mortality rate remains high for patients with myocardial dysfunction refractory to conventional treatments. Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-A ECMO) provides temporary support, potentially enhancing patient outcomes. This study aims to assess the efficacy of V-A ECMO in treating cardiovascular failure induced by cardiovascular medication poisoning. We utilized inpatient data from all hospitalisations in Germany from 2007 to 2022 due to cardiovascular medication poisoning treated with V-A ECMO. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, complications and application of ECMO were described descriptively and analysed for statistical significance between survivors and non-survivors. Overall, 49 patients received V-A ECMO for cardiovascular medication poisoning, with a survival rate of 63.6%. The most ingested medications were calcium-channel blockers (38.8%) and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (34.7%). Half of non-survivors received in-hospital CPR, compared to 12.9% of survivors. Early ECMO implantation (within 24 h of admission) was common (83.7%) but did not significantly impact survival rates. A substantial number of patients presented with multiple substances ingested. V-A ECMO represents a viable option for patients experiencing cardiac failure due to medication poisoning. A structured implementation of V-A ECMO for cardiovascular medication poisoning could lead to higher survival rates., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Access to cardiovascular medications is severely hampered by their unavailability and high cost, particularly for the poorest households in developing nations. The availability and price range of cardiovascular medications are significantly limited in both hospital and community pharmacies. Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the availability and price variations of commonly used cardiovascular medicines in hospital pharmacies in Gondar Town, northwest Ethiopia. Methods: From July 13 to August 6, 2022, a mixed cross-sectional and simulated client survey was carried out at two hospital and 13 community pharmacies in Gondar Town. The analysis and data entry were performed using SPSS Version 25 and EpiData Version 4.2, respectively. The availability and pricing variations of the medications are given as percentages. The significance was examined using paired t tests. Results: On average, community retail pharmacies offered 33.22% of CVD drugs. Aspirin (81 mg), amlodipine (5 mg), atorvastatin (20 mg), and hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) were the most readily available drugs in community pharmacies. Overall, 28.00% of the hospital pharmacies had available CVD medicines during the course of our analysis. The average cost for the 25 CVD medications in hospital pharmacies was $0.699, with a standard deviation (SD) of 1.513, which was less than the cost at community pharmacies ($2.741 with an SD of 6.015) ( p = 0.045). Conclusion: CVD medications were more available in community pharmacies than in hospital pharmacies, although there were fewer CVD medications available than recommended by the WHO/HAI (80%) in both hospital and community pharmacies. There was a statistically significant difference between the two prices. Compared to that at hospital pharmacies, the mean price at community pharmacies was greater., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Liknaw Workie Limenh et al.)

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. A total of 28 new molecular entities (NMEs) were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases from 2011 to 2023. Approximately 25 % of the medications were sanctioned for the management of diverse vascular disorders. The other major therapeutic areas of focus included antilipemic agents (15 %), blood pressure disease (11 %), heart failure, hyperkalemia, and cardiomyopathy (7-8% each). Among all the approved drugs, there are a total of 22 new chemical entities (NCEs), including inhibitors, agonists, polymers, and inorganic compounds. In addition to NCEs, 6 biological agents (BLAs), including monoclonal antibodies, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), and antisense oligonucleotides, have also obtained approval for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. From this perspective, approved NCEs are itemized and discussed based on their disease, targets, chemical classes, major drug metabolites, and biochemical and pharmacological properties. Systematic analysis has been conducted to examine the binding modes of these approved drugs with their targets using cocrystal structure information or docking studies to provide valuable insights for designing next-generation agents. Furthermore, the synthetic approaches employed in the creation of these drug molecules have been emphasized, aiming to inspire the development of novel, efficient, and applicable synthetic methodologies. Generally, the primary objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive examination of the clinical applications, pharmacology, binding modes, and synthetic methodologies employed in small-molecule drugs approved for treating CVD. This will facilitate the development of more potent and innovative therapeutics for effectively managing cardiovascular diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Quadruple therapy is effective for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, providing significant clinical benefits, including reduced mortality. Clinicians are now in an era focused on how to initiate and titrate quadrable therapy in the early phase of the disease trajectory, including during heart failure hospitalization. However, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction still face a significant "residual risk" of mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Despite the effective implementation of quadruple therapy, high mortality and rehospitalization rates persist in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and many patients cannot maximize therapy due to side effects such as hypotension and renal dysfunction. In this context, ivabradine, vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil may have adjunct roles in addition to quadruple therapy (note that omecamtiv mecarbil is not currently approved for clinical use). However, the contemporary use of ivabradine and vericiguat is relatively low globally, likely due in part to the under-recognition of the role of these therapies as well as costs. This review offers clinicians a straightforward guide for bedside evaluation of potential candidates for these medications. Quadruple therapy, with strong evidence to reduce mortality, should always be prioritized for implementation. As second-line therapies, ivabradine could be considered for patients who cannot achieve optimal heart rate control (≥ 70 bpm at rest) despite maximally tolerated beta-blocker dosing. Vericiguat could be considered for high-risk patients who have recently experienced worsening heart failure events despite being on quadrable therapy, but they should not have N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels exceeding 8000 pg/mL. In the future, omecamtiv mecarbil may be considered for severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III to IV, ejection fraction ≤ 30%, and heart failure hospitalization within 6 months) when current quadrable therapy is limited, although this is still hypothesis-generating and requires further investigation before its approval., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Hypertensive heart failure (HHF) has a high incidence and poor prognosis., Aim: This article evaluated the efficacy and safety of Vericiguat in HHF and analyzed the relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and patient prognosis., Methods: 110 HHF patients were divided into Placebo and Vericiguat groups. Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Blood samples were collected to detect the levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiac troponin I (cTnI), endothelin (ET-1), nitric oxide (NO), and CRP., Results: Left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD) and left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD) were reduced, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and 6MWT were increased, and the serum levels of NT-proBNP, cTnI, ET-1, NO, and CRP were decreased in Vericiguat group as against Placebo group; The total effective rate was 76.4% in Placebo group and 92.7% in Vericiguat group (P < 0.05). The adverse reaction rate was 10.9% and 9.1% (P > 0.05). The proportion of persons with poor prognosis and no improvement of cardiac function in patients with highly expressed CRP before treatment was higher as against patients with low expression of CRP (P < 0.05). Highly expressed CRP is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis., Conclusion: Vericiguat is safe and effective in improving cardiac function in HHF patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Timely carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of future stroke. This benefit is maximized with lifelong drug therapy aimed at reducing further major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including stroke. Studies suggest that around half discontinue these drugs within 12 months. To assess if this is the case following CEA, we considered the MACE-reducing drugs prescribed several years later and compared this with the drugs they were prescribed at CEA., Methods: The electronic primary care records of 347 post-CEA patients a mean of 108 (range 43-185) months after surgery were interrogated. The prescriptions of generic MACE-reducing drugs (antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, antihypertension and diabetes) of the 187 alive were compared with their prescriptions at CEA and with the last prescription of the 160 who had died before the late review. The post-CEA incidence of further MACE in survivors was determined., Results: At late review, fewer of the post-CEA patients alive were taking antiplatelet drugs (143, 76% vs. 170, 91% P < 0.01), but more were fully anticoagulated (37v4 P < 0.01) when compared with prescriptions at CEA. Overall, there was no change in antithrombotic drug prescription rates (167, 89% vs. 172, 92%). Lipid-regulating drugs were well prescribed both at late review and at CEA (173, 93% vs. 169, 90%). The number prescribed antihypertension drugs was significantly higher at late review than at CEA (166, 89% vs. 67, 35% P < 0.01). The number treated for diabetes was similar (64, 34% vs. 42, 23%). There was no difference in the numbers of any of the MACE-reducing drugs prescribed between those who had survived to late review and those who had not. At late review, of those alive, there were 22 (12%) new strokes, and 24 (14%) had developed new or worsening ischemic cardiac symptoms., Conclusions: We found a higher than expected prescription rate of MACE-reducing drugs many years after CEA. This finding may be due, in part, to the nationalized health service in the United Kingdom., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Despite major advances in cardiac research over the past three decades, cardiovascular disease (CVD) still remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women and men worldwide. However, a major challenge for health care providers is that the current guidelines for cardiovascular drug therapies do not consider the impact of sex in the development of treatment plan for optimizing therapies for women. Clinical research in recent years suggests significant pharmacological and pharmacokinetic differences between females and males, which have been attributed in part to differences in body composition, plasma protein binding capacity, drug metabolism, and excretion. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review regarding sex-specific differences and drugs commonly used for CVDs in women and men. Understanding how sex-related differences influence drug efficacy and CVD outcomes is crucial for not only optimizing treatment strategies for women and men but also to encourage the implementation of specific guidelines that address sex difference as a consideration for the treatment of CVDs., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. All the authors have contributed to preparing and editing this manuscript and have approved its submission for publication.

Background: The foundation for managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy. Finding an association between medication adherence and patients' health status (their symptoms, function, and quality of life) can be used to underscore its importance to patients., Methods: The association of self-reported medication adherence in US outpatients with HFrEF enrolled in the Change the Management of Patients with Heart Failure registry from 2015 to 2017 was compared with their health status at baseline and 12 months later. A secondary analysis of changes in adherence between baseline and 6 months with 6-month health status was also performed. Medication adherence was assessed with the self-reported 4-item Morisky-Green-Levine Medication Adherence Scale, with scores ≥1 classified as nonadherent. The primary health status outcome was the disease-specific 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OS; range, 0-100; higher is better). Robust linear regression models adjusted for confounders were used., Results: After excluding those who died (n=316) or did not provide 12-month KCCQ (n=1285), 3495 outpatients with HFrEF were included, of whom 1108 (31.7%) reported being nonadherent. Nonadherent participants were younger, had significantly worse baseline health status (-5.83-point difference; P <0.001), and showed less improvement at 12 months (-1.7-point difference in mean change; P =0.017) than adherent participants. Among nonadherent patients at baseline, those whose adherence improved trended toward greater 6-month health status improvements than those remaining nonadherent (fully adjusted difference of 2.52 points; P =0.054)., Conclusions: In HFrEF, medication nonadherence was associated with worse health status and less improvement over the following year. Improvements in adherence were associated with better health status than remaining nonadherent, underscoring the importance of supporting adherence with guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with HFrEF., Competing Interests: Dr El-Zein is currently supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) under award number T32H110837. The content is solely the responsibility of the author(s) and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Dr DeVore reports research funding through his institution from the American Heart Association, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Intra-Cellular Therapies, American Regent Inc, the NHLBI, Novartis, and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. He also provides consulting services for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, CareDx, InnaMed, LivaNova, Mardil Medical, Novartis, Procyrion, scPharmaceuticals, Story Health, and Zoll. He has also received nonfinancial support from Abbott for educational activities. Dr Thomas reports research funding Novartis. Dr Albert reports serving as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Boston Scientific. Dr Butler has received research support from the National Institutes of Health, PCORI and the European Union; and serves as a consultant for Amgen, Array, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squib, CVRx, G3 Pharmaceutical, Innolife, Janssen, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Relypsa, StealthPeptide, SC Pharma, Vifor, and ZS Pharma. Dr Hernandez has received research support from the American Heart Association, AstraZeneca, Merck, NHLBI, Luitpold, and Novartis, and honorarium from Bayer, Boston Scientific, and Novartis. Dr Patterson reports research funding from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and Novartis, and serves as a consultant to Amgen and Novartis. Dr Spertus reports research funding from NIH, Janssen, and Bristol Meyers Sqiubb. He served as a consultant to Bayer, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Merck, Janssen, Kinksia, Imbria, Cytokinetics, Alnylam, Sanofi Aventis, and United Healthcare. He owns the copyright to the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Peripheral Artery Questionnaire and serves on the Board of Directors for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas City. Dr Fonarow reports research funding from the National Institutes of Health and consulting for Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, and Medtronic. The other authors report no conflicts.

Despite the remarkable and progressive advances made in the prevention and management of cardiovascular diseases, the recurrence of cardiovascular events remains unacceptably elevated with a notable size of the residual risk. Indeed, in patients who suffered from myocardial infarction or who underwent percutaneous or surgical myocardial revascularization, life-style changes and optimized pharmacological therapy with antiplatelet drugs, lipid lowering agents, beta-blockers, renin angiotensin system inhibitors and antidiabetic drugs, when appropriate, are systematically prescribed but they might be insufficient to protect from further events. In such a context, an increasing body of evidence supports the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in the setting of secondary cardiovascular prevention, consisting in the reduction of myocardial oxygen demands, in the inhibition of atherosclerotic plaque progression and in an improvement of exercise performance, quality of life and survival. However, prescription and implementation of CR programs is still not sufficiently considered.The aim of this position paper of the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Prevention (SIPREC) and of the Italian Heart Failure Association (ITAHFA) is to examine the reasons of the insufficient use of this strategy in clinical practice and to propose some feasible solutions to overcome this clinical gap., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Over the last decade, randomized clinical trials of several pharmacologic agents have demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular mortality and other important secondary outcomes. Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibitors and Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter 2 inhibitors have now become pillars in the treatment of heart failure. Ivabradine is a negative chronotropic agent used as an adjunctive therapy in patients with heart failure. Two new hypertension therapies, zilebresiran and aprocitentan, are currently in investigational stages. Finally, mavacamten has emerged as a pharmacologic treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Practitioners must be familiar with the indications and side effects of newer therapies as they are now frequently prescribed., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Heart failure is a clinical syndrome with signs and symptoms from underlying cardiac abnormality and evidence of pulmonary or systemic congestion on laboratory testing or other objective findings (Bozkurt et al. in Eur J Heart Fail 23:352-380, 2021). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), when heart failure is due to underlying reduction in ejection fraction to ≤ 40. The goal of this review is to briefly describe the mechanisms and benefits of the various pharmacological interventions described in the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guidelines focusing on Stage C: Symptomatic Heart Failure HFrEF, while providing basic guidance on safe use of these medications., Recent Findings: Use of medications from each class as recommended in the 2022 Guidelines can provide significant morbidity and mortality benefits for our patients. Despite advances in therapeutics for patients with HFrEF, patients are frequently under treated and more research is needed to help optimize management of these complicated patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: Heart rate (HR) stands as a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular disease and a modifiable risk factor in heart failure (HF). Medication intolerance can curtail the application of conventional HR-lowering β-blockers to the optimum target dose. Ivabradine (IVA), a specific negative-chronotropic agent, selectively inhibits I f current in pacemaker cells of the sinoatrial node without depressing myocardial contractility or comprising hemodynamics. This review summarized ivabradine's clinical labeled and off-label uses and mechanism of action focusing on the clinical outcomes. PubMed was searched up to January 2024 using the main keywords of IVA, coronary artery disease (CAD), HF, postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), and tachyarrhythmia. To comprehensively review IVA's clinical indications, mechanisms, and therapeutic effects, all studies investigating treatment with IVA in humans were included, comprising different types of studies such as randomized controlled trials and longitudinal prospective observational studies. After screening, 141 studies were included in our review. A large number of reviewed articles were allocated to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and CAD, suggesting IVA as an alternative to β-blockers in case of contraindications or intolerance. The beneficial effects of IVA as premedication for coronary computed tomography angiography, HR lowering in POTS, and inappropriate sinus tachycardia constituted most studies among off-label uses. The promising results have been reported on the efficacy of IVA in controlling HR, especially in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia or POTS. Owing to the unique mechanism of action, IVA has the potential to be used more frequently in future clinical practice., Competing Interests: The conflict of interest disclosure and funding declaration: Nothing to disclose, (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Clinical trials, essential for medical advancement, vary significantly in methodology and regulatory pathways depending on the type of therapeutic intervention (i.e., drugs or devices). This study aimed to determine whether the drug or device intervention types influence the impact of randomized trials in cardiovascular medicine., Methods: We analyzed late-breaking randomized controlled trials presented at major cardiology conferences from 2015 to 2021. The primary endpoint was the total number of citations obtained. Secondary endpoints included the number of citations at 1 and 2 years, number of total and 1-year mentions, and several metrics of study conduct and publication. Statistical analysis included tests for comparisons of continuous or categorical variables, based on their distribution, as appropriate. To adjust the results for potential confounders, univariable and multivariable regression models were utilized. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore both the effect of neutral or positive study outcomes on the comparative impact of drug versus device trials and the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the primary endpoint., Results: Of 382 eligible randomized trials, 227 (59.4%) were trials of drugs and 155 (40.6%) were trials of devices. Drug trials had a higher median number of total citations compared to device studies (93 [interquartile range {IQR} 48-137] vs. 82 [IQR 39-192]; p = 0.025). This difference was consistent at 1 and 2 years and was also observed in the number of total mentions and mentions at 1 year. All the metrics of study conduct and publication were similar, except for drug studies being more often stopped prematurely (8.8 vs. 1.9%; p = 0.006). After adjusting for multiple potential confounders, the difference in citations and mentions was no longer statistically significant. However, drug trials remained more likely to be stopped prematurely (adjusted odds ratio = 1.15; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.28; p = 0.009). Positive study outcomes significantly influenced the number of citations and the likelihood of a trial being stopped prematurely., Conclusions: Drug trials are often stopped early and receive more citations and mentions than device trials. However, these differences are mainly due to factors other than the treatment itself. Studies published simultaneously tend to get more attention, and drug trials with positive results are cited more often than those with neutral results., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Ivabradine is a pharmacologic agent that inhibits the funny current responsible for determining heart rate in the sinoatrial node. Ivabradine's clinical potential has been investigated in the context of heart failure since it is associated with reduced myocardial oxygen demand, enhanced diastolic filling, stroke volume, and coronary perfusion time; however, it is yet to demonstrate definitive mortality benefit. Alternative effects of ivabradine include modulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, sympathetic activation, and endothelial function. Here, we review key clinical trials informing the clinical use of ivabradine and explore opportunities for leveraging its potential pleiotropic effects in other diseases, including treatment of hyperadrenergic states and mitigating complications of COVID-19 infection., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To identify highest-risk subgroups for COVID-19 and Long COVID(LC), particularly in contexts of influenza and cardiovascular disease(CVD)., Methods: Using national, linked electronic health records for England (NHS England Secure Data Environment via CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium), we studied individuals (of all ages) with COVID-19 and LC (2020-2023). We compared all-cause hospitalization and mortality by prior CVD, high CV risk, vaccination status (COVID-19/influenza), and CVD drugs, investigating impact of vaccination and CVD prevention using population preventable fractions., Results: Hospitalization and mortality were 15.3% and 2.0% among 17,373,850 individuals with COVID-19 (LC rate 1.3%), and 16.8% and 1.4% among 301,115 with LC. Adjusted risk of mortality and hospitalization were reduced with COVID-19 vaccination ≥ 2 doses(COVID-19:HR 0.36 and 0.69; LC:0.44 and 0.90). With influenza vaccination, mortality was reduced, but not hospitalization (COVID-19:0.86 and 1.01, and LC:0.72 and 1.05). Mortality and hospitalization were reduced by CVD prevention in those with CVD, e.g., anticoagulants- COVID:19:0.69 and 0.92; LC:0.59 and 0.88; lipid lowering- COVID-19:0.69 and 0.86; LC:0.68 and 0.90. COVID-19 vaccination averted 245044 of 321383 and 7586 of 8738 preventable deaths after COVID-19 and LC, respectively., Interpretation: Prior CVD and high CV risk are associated with increased hospitalization and mortality in COVID-19 and LC. Targeted COVID-19 vaccination and CVD prevention are priority interventions., Funding: NIHR. HDR UK., Competing Interests: Declarations of competing interest KK is chair of the ethnicity subgroup of the UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) and is a member of SAGE. KK (Chair) and AB are members of the LC Research Group that reports to the Chief Medical Officer for England. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of various commonly used drugs in treating patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Randomized controlled trials on drugs for HCM treatment were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (search cutoff: January 10, 2024). Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias tool, and data analysis used R software. Seventeen studies (1,133 patients with HCM) were included. The network meta-analysis indicated that mavacamten and perhexiline improved peak oxygen consumption compared with placebo. Mavacamten reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular mass index, left atrial volume index, and septal E/e' ratio. Losartan decreased systolic blood pressure, whereas candesartan, mavacamten, and valsartan reduced maximum wall thickness. Perhexiline had better efficacy in increasing peak oxygen consumption, and candesartan in reducing maximum wall thickness. No drug significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction compared with placebo. In conclusion, on the basis of current studies, commonly used drugs may effectively improve some of the outcome measures in patients with HCM, whereas the novel drug mavacamten showed significant therapeutic effects in most of the remaining outcome measures except for left ventricular ejection fraction., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Tan reports financial support, study publishing charges, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by Sun Yat-Sen University. The remaining author has no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) patients, mavacamten is commercially approved to help improve left ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT) gradients, symptoms, and reduce eligibility for septal reduction therapy (SRT) under the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) program. We sought to prospectively report the initial real-world clinical experience with the use of commercially available mavacamten in a multi-hospital tertiary healthcare system., Methods: We studied the first 150 consecutive oHCM patients (mean age 65 years, 53% women, 83% on betablockers and 61% in New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III) who were initiated on 5 mg of mavacamten with dose titrations using symptom assessment and echocardiographic measurements of LVOT gradient and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements. We measured changes in NYHA class, LVEF, LVOT gradients (resting and Valsalva) at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks., Results: At 261 ± 143 days (range of 31-571 days), 69 (46%) patients had ≥1 NYHA class, and 27 (18%) additional patients had ≥2 NYHA class improvement. The mean Valsalva LVOT gradient decreased from 72 ± 43 mmHg at baseline to 29 ± 31 mmHg at 4 weeks, 29 ± 28 mmHg at 8 weeks and 30 ± 29 mmHg at 12 weeks (p < 0.001). At baseline, 100% patients had Valsalva LVOT gradients ≥30 mmHg, which reduced to 29% at 4 weeks, 28% at 8 weeks and 30% at 12 weeks. In 40 patients who reported no symptomatic improvement, the mean Valsalva LVOT gradient decreased from 73 ± 39 mmHg at baseline to 34 ± 27 mmHg at 4 weeks, 35 ± 28 mmHg at 8 weeks and 30 ± 24 mmHg at 12 weeks (P < 0.001). The mean LVEF at baseline was 66 ± 6% and changed to 64 ± 5% at 4 weeks, 63 ± 5% at 8 weeks and 62 ± 7% at 12 weeks (p < 0.0001). No patient underwent SRT, developed LVEF ≤30% or developed heart failure requiring admission. Three (2%) patients needed temporary interruption of mavacamten due to LVEF<50%., Conclusions: In a real-world study in symptomatic oHCM patients at a multi-hospital tertiary care referral center, we demonstrate the efficacy and safety, along with the logistic feasibility of prescribing mavacamten under the REMS program., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Desai is a consultant and has research agreements with Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Tenaya, Viz-AI and Edgewise. No industry support was utilized in the conduct of this study. Dr. Emery is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb. Others have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Tanshinone, a natural compound found in the roots of Salvia miltiorrhiza, has been shown to possess various pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and cardiovascular protective effects. This article aims to review the literature on the cardiovascular protective effects of tanshinone and its underlying mechanisms. Tanshinone has been demonstrated to improve cardiac function, reduce oxidative stress, and inhibit inflammation in various animal models of cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, it has been shown to regulate multiple signaling pathways involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases, such as the PI 3 K/AKT, MAPK, and NF-κB pathways. Clinical studies have also suggested that tanshinone may have therapeutic potential for treating cardiovascular diseases. In conclusion, tanshinone has emerged as a promising natural compound with significant cardiovascular protective effects, and further research is warranted to explore its potential clinical applications., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflicts of interest The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical Approval This is a review article. Ethical approval is not required for the study., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Angiotensin II receptors, Type 1 (AT1R) and Type 2 (AT2R) are 7TM receptors that play critical roles in both the physiological and pathophysiological regulation of the cardiovascular system. While AT1R blockers (ARBs) have proven beneficial in managing cardiac, vascular and renal maladies they cannot completely halt and reverse the progression of pathologies. Numerous experimental and animal studies have demonstrated that β-arrestin biased AT1R-ligands (such as SII-AngII, S1I8, TRV023, and TRV027) offer cardiovascular benefits by blocking the G protein signaling while retaining the β-arrestin signaling. However, these ligands failed to show improvement in heart-failure outcome over the placebo in a phase IIb clinical trial. One major limitation of current β-arrestin biased AT1R-ligands is that they are peptides with short half-lives, limiting their long-term efficacy in patients. Additionally, β-arrestin biased AT1R-ligand peptides, may inadvertently block AT2R, a promiscuous receptor, potentially negating its beneficial effects in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Therefore, developing a small molecule β-arrestin biased AT1R-ligand with a longer half-life and specificity to AT1R could be more effective in treating heart failure. This approach has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of cardiovascular diseases by offering more sustained and targeted therapeutic effects., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Sadashiva S. Karnik reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. Sadashiva S. Karnik reports financial support was provided by CLEVELAND CLINIC. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Management strategies for stable angina include pharmacotherapy, revascularization, and exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR). The optimal treatment for stable angina patients with severe coronary artery stenosis remains unclear. This study aimed to compare interventional therapy with exercise rehabilitation in this population., Methods: Fifty stable angina patients with severe coronary stenosis who underwent stent implantation were included in the optimal medical therapy (OMT) plus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group, and 50 patients who did not undergo interventional treatment were included in OMT plus CR group receiving exercise rehabilitation guidance for one year. Cardiovascular composite endpoint events, cardiopulmonary fitness, and quality of life scale scores were assessed after one year., Results: No significant difference in incidence of cardiovascular composite endpoint events was observed between OMT plus PCI group with OMT plus CR group (20.0% vs 14.6%) after one year. Cardiopulmonary fitness represented as peak VO 2 (19.2±3.5 vs 17.6±3.2 mL/kg/min), peak load (120±19 vs 108±20 W), and AT (13.5±1.5 vs 12.1±1.3 mL/kg/min) were significantly higher in the rehabilitation group than the intervention group after one year. Both groups showed improvement in their quality of life, but the rehabilitation group improved in more scales., Conclusion: Interventional therapy did not reduce cardiovascular events compared to exercise-based rehabilitation in stable angina patients with severe coronary artery stenosis, but the rehabilitation can improve cardiovascular fitness and quality of life more., Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© 2024 Wu et al.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe a population of very old people with heart failure (HF), to analyse the use of cardiovascular drugs over time, and to explore factors influencing cardiovascular drug treatment for this group., Methods: All participants with information regarding HF diagnosis were selected from the Umeå 85+/Gerontological Regional Database (GERDA). The people in GERDA are all ≥85 years old. Trained investigators performed structured interviews and assessments. Information regarding medications and diagnoses was obtained from the participants and from medical records. Medical diagnoses were reviewed and confirmed by an experienced geriatrician., Results: In this very old population, the prevalence of HF was 29.6% among women and 30.7% among men. Between 2000 and 2017, there was an increase in the use of renin-angiotensin (RAS) inhibitors (odds ratio [OR] 1.107, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.072-1.144) and beta-blockers (BBs) (OR 1.123, 95% CI 1.086-1.161) among persons with HF, whereas the prevalence of loop diuretics (OR 0.899, 95% CI 0.868-0.931) and digitalis (OR 0.864, 95% CI 0.828-0.901) decreased (p < 0.001 for all drug classes). Higher age was associated with lower use of RAS inhibitors and BBs., Conclusion: In this HF population, the use of evidence-based medications for HF increased over time. This may be a sign of better awareness among prescribers regarding the under-prescribing of guidelines-recommended treatment to old people. Higher age associated with a lower prevalence of RAS inhibitors and BBs. This might indicate that further improvement is possible but could also represent a more cautious prescribing among frail very old individuals., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Chronic heart failure affects approximately 26 million people globally. World Health Organization data show that only approximately half of chronically ill patients in developed countries adhere to recommended medication, with even lower rates in developing countries. Medication adherence is critical for managing chronic heart failure symptoms, delaying disease progression, and preventing hospitalizations. However, poor adherence increases rehospitalization, morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs., Objective: To assess medication adherence and associated factors among chronic heart failure patients on follow-up at North Shewa Public Hospitals, Oromia Region, Ethiopia, in 2023., Methods: This institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March 1 to April 30, 2023, G.C. A total of 603 individuals were selected consecutively among those who underwent chronic OPD after being proportionally allocated to five hospitals in the zone. The data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and a medical chart review. The data were entered into Epi-data version 3.1 and then exported to SPSS version 26 for analysis. The multivariable logistic regression model included variables with a P value < 0.25 in the bivariate analysis. The degree of association was expressed using an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) at a P value < 0.05., Results: Among the 603 patients, 56% had optimal medication adherence, with a 95% CI of 52.1 to 60. Being able to read and write (AOR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.34, 3.61), having a secondary education (AOR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.06, 3.67), having community-based health insurance (AOR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.71), not having comorbidities (AOR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.52), taking several drugs < 2 (AOR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.45), not adding salt when cooking (AOR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.45), and asking a doctor or nurse without fear (AOR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.03, 3.40) were factors associated with medication adherence among CHF patients., Conclusion: This study revealed that 56% of chronic heart failure patients had optimal medication adherence. Factors associated with higher adherence included higher education, community health insurance, lack of comorbidities, fewer medications, avoiding added salt, and comfortable communication with providers. Health professionals should provide education to strengthen medication adherence., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared.

Aims: The study sought to comprehensively investigate the effect of heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapies in patients with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). In the absence of randomized controlled trials, guideline recommendations concerning HF-related therapies in patients with HFmrEF are limited., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients hospitalized with HFmrEF were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. The prognostic value of treatment with beta-blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, receptor blockers, or receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ACEi/ARB/ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose-linked transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was investigated for all-cause mortality at 30 months (a median follow-up) and HF-related rehospitalization. A total of 2109 patients with HFmrEF were included. Treatment with BB [27.0 vs. 35.0%; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.737; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.617-0.881; P = 0.001], ACEi/ARB/ARNI (25.9 vs. 37.6%; HR = 0.612; 95% CI 0.517-0.725; P = 0.001), and SGLT2i (11.9 vs. 29.5%; HR = 0.441; 95% CI 0.236-0.824; P = 0.010) was associated with a lower risk of 30-month all-cause mortality, which was still demonstrated after multivariable adjustment and propensity score matching. In contrast, MRA treatment was not associated with long-term prognosis. The risk of HF-related rehospitalization was not affected by HF pharmacotherapies. Finally, the lowest risk of long-term all-cause mortality was observed in patients with combined use of BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI, and SGLT2i (HR = 0.456; 95% CI 0.227-0.916; P = 0.027)., Conclusion: Beta-blockers, ACEi/ARB/ARNI, and SGLT2i were independently associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with HFmrEF, specifically when applied as combined 'HF triple therapy'. Randomized studies are needed to investigate the effect of HF-related pharmacotherapies in patients with HFmrEF., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Partial or complete imaging resolution of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has gone by many names in the past few decades, including LV recovery, remission, reverse remodeling, and, most recently, improvement. This phenomenon has been described in a variety of clinical scenarios, including removal of an acute myocardial insult, unloading with durable LV assist devices, and treatment with various devices as well as pharmacotherapies, termed guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Irrespective of definition, systolic improvement is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to persistent systolic dysfunction. In the past few years, systolic improvement has been distinguished from HFrEF as a new clinical entity referred to as HF with improved EF (HFimpEF). Given the relative novelty of this condition, there is a paucity of data with regard to the clinical trajectory and management of this population. In this review, we describe the history of myocardial improvement terminology and explore notable findings that have led to the delineation of HFimpEF. Additionally, we highlight the importance of understanding LV trajectory and the potential opportunity for new GDMT management for clinicians when treating patients with HFimpEF., Competing Interests: Dr. Wilcox is a consultant for Abbott, Abiomed, Astra Zeneca, and Boehringer Ingelheim. The other authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: Physician underprescribing and patient nonadherence are major barriers to the benefits of guideline-directed medical therapy. An important contributor to both underprescribing and patient nonadherence is concern about medication-related side effects. Yet, there are few to no data on approaches used by physicians to: (1) elicit medication-related side effects, (2) attribute these side effects to specific medications, and (3) take appropriate action., Methods and Results: The authors conducted semistructured interviews with physicians to identify facilitators and barriers to each critical step of heart failure medication management: elicitation of side effects, attribution of side effects to a medication, and action in response to attributed side effects. Interviews were transcribed and coded using directed content analysis. For elicitation of potential side effects, limited patient communication and family discordance in reporting were key barriers, whereas guiding questions, measurement, and open channels of communication were key facilitators. For attribution of side effects, confounding from other medications, limited time for clinical encounters, and nonspecific symptoms were key barriers, whereas time-limited medication discontinuation trials and medication rechallenges were key facilitators. For taking action, challenges with weighing risks and benefits and physician fear about causing harm or interfering with other clinicians were barriers, whereas patient-physician communication and the results of a medication discontinuation trials and medication rechallenge were facilitators., Conclusions: This study generated key facilitators and barriers to 3 key aspects of heart failure medication management related to side effects that should drive future work to improve heart failure medication management.

Recent breakthroughs in human genetics and in information technologies have markedly expanded our understanding at the molecular level of the response to drugs, i.e., pharmacogenetics (PGx), across therapy areas. This review is restricted to PGx for cardiovascular (CV) drugs. First, we examined the PGx information in the labels approved by regulatory agencies in Europe, Japan, and North America and related recommendations from expert panels. Out of 221 marketed CV drugs, 36 had PGx information in their labels approved by one or more agencies. The level of annotations and recommendations varied markedly between agencies and expert panels. Clopidogrel is the only CV drug with consistent PGx recommendation (i.e., "actionable"). This situation prompted us to dissect the steps from discovery of a PGx association to clinical translation. We found 101 genome-wide association studies that investigated the response to CV drugs or drug classes. These studies reported significant associations for 48 PGx traits mapping to 306 genes. Six of these 306 genes are mentioned in the corresponding PGx labels or recommendations for CV drugs. Genomic analyses also highlighted the wide between-population differences in risk allele frequencies and the individual load of actionable PGx variants. Given the high attrition rate and the long road to clinical translation, additional work is warranted to identify and validate PGx variants for more CV drugs across diverse populations and to demonstrate the utility of PGx testing. To that end, pre-emptive PGx combining genomic profiling with electronic medical records opens unprecedented opportunities to improve healthcare, for CV diseases and beyond. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Despite spectacular breakthroughs in human molecular genetics and information technologies, consistent evidence supporting PGx testing in the cardiovascular area is limited to a few drugs. Additional work is warranted to discover and validate new PGx markers and demonstrate their utility. Pre-emptive PGx combining genomic profiling with electronic medical records opens unprecedented opportunities to improve healthcare, for CV diseases and beyond., (Copyright © 2024 by The Author(s).)

The prevention and treatment strategies for heart failure (HF) have evolved in the past two decades. The stages of HF have been redefined, with recognition of the pre-HF state, which encompasses asymptomatic patients who have developed either structural or functional cardiac abnormalities or have elevated plasma levels of natriuretic peptides or cardiac troponin. The first-line treatment of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction includes foundational therapies with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and diuretics. The first-line treatment of patients with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction or with HF with preserved ejection fraction includes SGLT2 inhibitors and diuretics. The timely initiation of these disease-modifying therapies and the optimization of treatment are crucial in all patients with HF. Reassessment after initiation of these therapies is recommended to evaluate patient symptoms, health status and left ventricular function, and timely referral to a HF specialist is necessary if a patient has persistent advanced HF symptoms or worsening HF. Lifestyle modification and treatment of comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation are crucial through each stage of HF. This Review provides an overview of the management strategies for HF according to disease stages that are derived from the recommendations in the latest US and European HF guidelines., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have a complex pathogenesis and pose a major threat to human health. Cardiomyocytes have a low regenerative capacity, and their death is a key factor in the morbidity and mortality of many CVDs. Cardiomyocyte death can be regulated by specific signaling pathways known as programmed cell death (PCD), including apoptosis, necroptosis, autophagy, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis, etc. Abnormalities in PCD can lead to the development of a variety of cardiovascular diseases, and there are also molecular-level interconnections between different PCD pathways under the same cardiovascular disease model. Currently, the link between programmed cell death in cardiomyocytes and cardiovascular disease is not fully understood. This review describes the molecular mechanisms of programmed death and the impact of cardiomyocyte death on cardiovascular disease development. Emphasis is placed on a summary of drugs and potential therapeutic approaches that can be used to treat cardiovascular disease by targeting and blocking programmed cell death in cardiomyocytes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest I'd like to declare on behalf of my co-author that the work described was original research that has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. No conflict of interest exists in the submission of this manuscript, and all the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is closed., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death globally. Ensuring ongoing use of medicines-medication persistence-is crucial, yet no prior studies have examined this in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). We aimed to identify long-term trajectories of persistence with cardiovascular medicines and determine predictors of persistence trajectories., Method: A longitudinal cohort study of 2837 newly admitted permanent residents from 30 RACFs in New South Wales, Australia. We monitored weekly exposure to six cardiovascular medicine classes-lipid modifiers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARBs), beta-blockers, diuretics, calcium channel blockers (CCB), and cardiac therapy-over 3 years. Group-based trajectory modeling was employed to determine persistence trajectories for each class., Results: At baseline, 76.6% (n = 2172) received at least one cardiovascular medicine with 41.2% receiving lipid modifiers, 31.4% ACEI/ARBs, 30.2% beta-blockers, 24.4% diuretics, 18.7% CCBs, and 14.8% cardiac therapy. The model identified two persistence trajectories for CCBs and three trajectories for all other classes. Sustained high persistence rates ranged from 68.4% (ACEI/ARBs) to 79.8% (beta-blockers) while early decline in persistence and subsequent discontinuation rates ranged from 7.6% (cardiac therapy) to 25.3% (CCBs). Logistic regressions identified 11 predictors of a declining persistence across the six medicine classes., Conclusion: Our study revealed varied patterns of cardiovascular medicine use in RACFs, with 2-3 distinctive medicine use trajectories across different classes, each exhibiting a unique clinical profile, and up to a quarter of residents discontinuing a medicine class. Future studies should explore the underlying reasons and appropriateness of nonpersistence to aid in identifying areas for improvement., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)