Search

We present a patient of a 46-year-old female patient was admitted to our hospital due to chest tightness and shortness of breath that lasted for over a month. Echocardiography revealed left-ventricle diameter (anteroposterior) of 54 mm, electrocardiogram showed sinus bradycardia, and QRS duration of 90 ms. The patient experienced no chest tightness or shortness of breath, and there was a marked improvement in exercise tolerance and quality of life after cardiac contractility modulation implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Infection is a significant complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. The European TauroPace™ Registry investigates the safety and efficacy of TauroPace™ (TP), an antimicrobial solution containing taurolidine, designed to prevent CIED infections. Methods This multicenter study included patients undergoing CIED procedures at participating centers where TP was used as a disinfectant for external hardware surfaces and an antiseptic for irrigating surgical sites. All patients eligible for CIED placement with adjunctive TP as the standard of care were included. Other aspects of CIED procedures adhered to current guidelines. Data on CIED-related infective endocarditis, CIED pocket infection, device and procedure-related complications, adverse events, and all-cause mortality were prospectively collected for 12 months. In cases of revision, the previous procedure was censored, and a new procedure was created. Binomial and Kaplan–Meier statistics were employed to analyze event rates. Results From January 2020 to November 2022, TP was used in 822 out of 1170 CIED procedures. Among patients who completed the 3-month follow-up, no CIED pocket infections were observed, and one case of CIED-related infective endocarditis was reported. In the 12-month follow-up cohort, two additional local pocket CIED infections were observed, resulting in a total of three major CIED infections within 1 year after the CIED placement procedure. The 3-month and 12-month major CIED infection rates were 0.125% and 0.51%, respectively. During the observation a complication rate of 4.4% was reported. No adverse events related to TP were observed. Conclusions TP appears to be effective and safe in preventing CIED infections. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04735666.

Introduction: Infection is a significant complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. The European TauroPace™ Registry investigates the safety and efficacy of TauroPace™ (TP), an antimicrobial solution containing taurolidine, designed to prevent CIED infections. Methods: This multicenter study included patients undergoing CIED procedures at participating centers where TP was used as a disinfectant for external hardware surfaces and an antiseptic for irrigating surgical sites. All patients eligible for CIED placement with adjunctive TP as the standard of care were included. Other aspects of CIED procedures adhered to current guidelines. Data on CIED-related infective endocarditis, CIED pocket infection, device and procedure-related complications, adverse events, and all-cause mortality were prospectively collected for 12 months. In cases of revision, the previous procedure was censored, and a new procedure was created. Binomial and Kaplan–Meier statistics were employed to analyze event rates. Results: From January 2020 to November 2022, TP was used in 822 out of 1170 CIED procedures. Among patients who completed the 3-month follow-up, no CIED pocket infections were observed, and one case of CIED-related infective endocarditis was reported. In the 12-month follow-up cohort, two additional local pocket CIED infections were observed, resulting in a total of three major CIED infections within 1 year after the CIED placement procedure. The 3-month and 12-month major CIED infection rates were 0.125% and 0.51%, respectively. During the observation a complication rate of 4.4% was reported. No adverse events related to TP were observed. Conclusions: TP appears to be effective and safe in preventing CIED infections. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04735666. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cardiac implantable electrical devices are able to affect kidney function through hemodynamic improvements. The cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a device-based therapy option for patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) despite optimized medical treatment. The long-term cardiorenal interactions for CCM treated patients are yet to be described. Methods: CCM recipients (n = 187) from the Mannheim Cardiac Contractility Modulation Observational Study (MAINTAINED) were evaluated in the long-term (up to 60 months) for changes in serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), other surrogate markers of kidney function, and the chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage distribution. With regard to kidney function at baseline, the patients were furthermore grouped to either advanced CKD (aCKD, CKD stage ≥3, eGFR≤59 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 107) or preserved kidney function and mild CKD (pCKD, CKD stages 1–2, eGFR≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 80). The groups were compared for differences regarding kidney function, New York Heart Association classification (NYHA), biventricular systolic function, HF hospitalizations and other parameters in the long-term (60 months). Results: CKD stage distribution remained stable during the entire follow-up (p = 0.65). An increase in serum creatinine (1.47 ± 1 vs. 1.6±1 mg/dL) with a corresponding decline of eGFR (58.2 ± 23.4 vs. 54.2 ± 24.4 mL/min/1.73 m2, both p < 0.05) were seen after 60 months but not before for the total cohort, which was only significant in pCKD patients in terms of group comparison. Mean survival (54.3 ± 1.3 vs. 55.3 ± 1.2 months, p = 0.53) was comparable in both groups. Improvements in NYHA (3.11 ± 0.46 vs. 2.94 ± 0.41–2.28 ± 0.8 vs. 1.94 ± 0.6) and LVEF (24.8 ± 7.1 vs. 22.9 ± 6.6–31.1 ± 11.4 vs. 35.5 ± 11.1%) were likewise similar after 60 months (both p < 0.05). The aCKD patients suffered from more HF hospitalizations and ventricular tachycardias during the entire follow-up period (both p < 0.05). Conclusions: The kidney function parameters and CKD stage distribution might remain stable in CCM treated HF patients in the long-term, who experience improvements in LVEF and functional status, regardless of their kidney function before. An impaired kidney function might be associated with further cardiovascular comorbidities and more advanced HF before CCM, and could be an additional risk factor of HF complications afterward. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a medical device‐based therapy delivering non‐excitatory electrical stimulations to the heart to enhance cardiac function in heart failure (HF) patients. The lack of human in vitro tools to assess CCM hinders our understanding of CCM mechanisms of action. Here, we introduce a novel chronic (i.e., 2‐day) in vitro CCM assay to evaluate the effects of CCM in a human 3D microphysiological system consisting of engineered cardiac tissues (ECTs). Methods: Cryopreserved human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes were used to generate 3D ECTs. The ECTs were cultured, incorporating human primary ventricular cardiac fibroblasts and a fibrin‐based gel. Electrical stimulation was applied using two separate pulse generators for the CCM group and control group. Contractile properties and intracellular calcium were measured, and a cardiac gene quantitative PCR screen was conducted. Results: Chronic CCM increased contraction amplitude and duration, enhanced intracellular calcium transient amplitude, and altered gene expression related to HF (i.e., natriuretic peptide B, NPPB) and excitation‐contraction coupling (i.e., sodium‐ calcium exchanger, SLC8). Conclusion: These data represent the first study of chronic CCM in a 3D ECT model, providing a nonclinical tool to assess the effects of cardiac electrophysiology medical device signals complementing in vivo animal studies. The methodology established a standardized 3D ECT‐based in vitro testbed for chronic CCM, allowing evaluation of physiological and molecular effects on human cardiac tissues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Experimental in vivo and in vitro studies showed that electric currents applied during the absolute refractory period can modulate cardiac contractility. In preclinical studies, cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) was found to improve calcium handling, reverse the foetal myocyte gene programming associated with heart failure (HF), and facilitate reverse remodeling. Randomized control trials and observational studies have provided evidence about the safety and efficacy of CCM in patients with HF. Clinically, CCM therapy is indicated to improve the 6-min hall walk, quality of life, and functional status of HF patients who remain symptomatic despite guideline-directed medical treatment without an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ranging from 25 to 45%. Although there are promising results about the role of CCM in HF patients with preserved LVEF (HFpEF), further studies are needed to elucidate the role of CCM therapy in this population. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessment before CCM implantation has been proposed for guiding the lead placement. Furthermore, the optimal duration of CCM application needs further investigation. This review aims to present the existing evidence regarding the role of CCM therapy in HF patients and identify gaps and challenges that require further studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aims Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a device therapy for heart failure, based on the delivery of high‐voltage biphasic impulses to the right ventricular septum during the myocardial absolute refractory period. This study evaluated the cost‐effectiveness of CCM therapy plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) vs. OMT alone in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Methods and results A Markov model with a lifespan time horizon was developed to assess the cost–utility using the FIX trials as main data sources. A deterministic sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were run to analyse the decision uncertainty in the model through cost‐effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) and cost‐effectiveness acceptability frontier (CEAF). Value of information analysis was also conducted computing the expected value of perfect information (EVPI) and the expected value of partial perfect information. The base case results showed that the CCM plus OMT option was highly cost‐effective compared with OMT alone with an incremental cost–utility ratio of €7034/quality‐adjusted life year (QALY). The CEAC and CEAF illustrated that for all willingness to pay levels above €5600/QALY, tested up to €50 000/QALY, CCM plus OMT alternative had the highest probability of being cost‐effective. The EVPI per patient was estimated to be €124 412 on a willingness to pay threshold of €30 000/QALY. Conclusions For patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, CCM therapy could be cost‐effective when taking a lifetime horizon. Further long‐term, post‐approval clinical studies are needed to verify these results in a real‐world context, particularly concerning the effect of CCM therapy on mortality.

Abstract Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) offers a novel therapeutic avenue for heart failure patients, particularly those unresponsive to cardiac resynchronization therapy within specific QRS duration ranges. This review elucidates CCM's mechanistic underpinnings, its impact on myocardial function, and utility across patient demographics. However, CCM is limited by insufficient data on mortality and hospitalization rate reductions, as well as the need for specialized device implantation skills. While prevailing research has concentrated on left ventricular effects, a knowledge gap persists for other patient subsets. Future inquiries should address combinatory treatment strategies, extended usage and the impact of atrial fibrillation on device implantation. Such expanded studies could refine therapeutic outcomes and widen the scope of beneficiaries.

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a novel device‐based therapy used to treat patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In both randomized clinical trials and real‐life studies, CCM has been shown to improve exercise tolerance and quality of life, reverse left ventricular remodeling, and reduce hospitalization in patients with HFrEF. In this case report, we describe for the first time the use of CCM combined with left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT‐P) implantation therapy in a female with a 22‐year history of non‐ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. With the optimal medical therapy and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) strategies, the patient's quality of life initially recovered to some extent, but began to deteriorate in the past year. Additionally, heart transplantation was not considered due to economic reasons and late stage systolic heart failure. This is the first case of CCM implantation in Fujian Province and the first report of a combined CCM and left bundle branch pacing CRT‐P implantation strategy in a patient with non‐ischemic etiology dilated cardiomyopathy in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Worsening heart failure (WHF) is a severe and dynamic condition characterized by significant clinical and hemodynamic deterioration. It is characterized by worsening HF signs, symptoms and biomarkers, despite the achievement of an optimized medical therapy. It remains a significant challenge in cardiology, as it evolves into advanced and end-stage HF. The hyperactivation of the neurohormonal, adrenergic and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system are well known pathophysiological pathways involved in HF. Several drugs have been developed to inhibit the latter, resulting in an improvement in life expectancy. Nevertheless, patients are exposed to a residual risk of adverse events, and the exploration of new molecular pathways and therapeutic targets is required. This review explores the current landscape of WHF, highlighting the complexities and factors contributing to this critical condition. Most recent medical advances have introduced cutting-edge pharmacological agents, such as guanylate cyclase stimulators and myosin activators. Regarding device-based therapies, invasive pulmonary pressure measurement and cardiac contractility modulation have emerged as promising tools to increase the quality of life and reduce hospitalizations due to HF exacerbations. Recent innovations in terms of WHF management emphasize the need for a multifaceted and patient-centric approach to address the complex HF syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) offers a novel therapeutic avenue for heart failure patients, particularly those unresponsive to cardiac resynchronization therapy within specific QRS duration ranges. This review elucidates CCM's mechanistic underpinnings, its impact on myocardial function, and utility across patient demographics. However, CCM is limited by insufficient data on mortality and hospitalization rate reductions, as well as the need for specialized device implantation skills. While prevailing research has concentrated on left ventricular effects, a knowledge gap persists for other patient subsets. Future inquiries should address combinatory treatment strategies, extended usage and the impact of atrial fibrillation on device implantation. Such expanded studies could refine therapeutic outcomes and widen the scope of beneficiaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a device therapy for heart failure, based on the delivery of high‐voltage biphasic impulses to the right ventricular septum during the myocardial absolute refractory period. This study evaluated the cost‐effectiveness of CCM therapy plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) vs. OMT alone in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Methods and results: A Markov model with a lifespan time horizon was developed to assess the cost–utility using the FIX trials as main data sources. A deterministic sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were run to analyse the decision uncertainty in the model through cost‐effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) and cost‐effectiveness acceptability frontier (CEAF). Value of information analysis was also conducted computing the expected value of perfect information (EVPI) and the expected value of partial perfect information. The base case results showed that the CCM plus OMT option was highly cost‐effective compared with OMT alone with an incremental cost–utility ratio of €7034/quality‐adjusted life year (QALY). The CEAC and CEAF illustrated that for all willingness to pay levels above €5600/QALY, tested up to €50 000/QALY, CCM plus OMT alternative had the highest probability of being cost‐effective. The EVPI per patient was estimated to be €124 412 on a willingness to pay threshold of €30 000/QALY. Conclusions: For patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, CCM therapy could be cost‐effective when taking a lifetime horizon. Further long‐term, post‐approval clinical studies are needed to verify these results in a real‐world context, particularly concerning the effect of CCM therapy on mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The Breakthrough Devices Program of the US Food and Drug Administration has accelerated the development and evaluation of medical devices for patients with heart failure. One such device is the Optimizer Smart System, which the US Food and Drug Administration approved in 2019. Methods and Results The Optimizer device was evaluated in a pivotal randomized clinical trial (FIX‐HF‐5C [Confirmatory Randomized Trial Evaluating the Optimizer System]) that leveraged Bayesian borrowing of external data to reduce the sample size and determine therapeutic device benefit versus continued medical therapy. Bayesian borrowing is explained in the context of the FIX‐HF‐5C trial, including an overview of the statistical methodologies, regulatory considerations, and interpretations of trial results. Conclusions The US Food and Drug Administration Breakthrough Devices Program and novel Bayesian statistical methodology accelerated the path to regulatory approval and patient access to a potentially lifesaving device and may serve as a model for future clinical trials.

The prognosis for heart failure (HF) patients remains poor, with a high mortality rate, and a marked reduction in quality of life (QOL) and functional status. This study aims to explore the ongoing needs of HF management and the epidemiology of patients followed by Italian HF clinics, with a specific focus on cardiac contractility modulation (CCM). Data from patients admitted to 14 HF outpatients clinics over 4 weeks were collected and compared to the results of a survey open to physicians involved in HF management operating in Italian centers. One hundred and five physicians took part in the survey. Despite 94% of patients receive a regular follow-up every 3–6 months, available therapies are considered insufficient in 30% of cases. Physicians reported a lack of treatment options for 23% of symptomatic patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and for 66% of those without reduced EF. Approximately 3% of HF population (two patients per month per HF clinic) meets the criteria for immediate CCM treatment, which is considered a useful option by 15% of survey respondents. Despite this relatively small percentage, considering total HF population, CCM could potentially benefit numerous HF patients, particularly the elderly, by reducing hospitalizations, improving functional capacity and QOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) causes a progressive limitation of functional capacity, poor quality of life (QoL) and increased mortality, yet unlike HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) there are no effective device-based therapies. Both HFrEF and HFpEF are associated with dysregulations in myocardial cellular calcium homeostasis and modifications in calcium-handling proteins, leading to abnormal myocardial contractility and pathological remodelling. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy, based on a pacemaker-like implanted device, applies extracellular electrical stimulation to myocytes during the absolute refractory period of the action potential, which leads to an increase in cytosolic peak calcium concentrations and thereby the force of isometric contraction promoting positive inotropism. Subgroup analysis of CCM trials in HFrEF has demonstrated particular benefits in patients with LVEF between 35% and 45%, suggesting its potential effectiveness also in patients with higher LVEF values. Available evidence on CCM in HFpEF is still preliminary, but improvements in terms of symptoms and QoL have been observed. Future large, dedicated, prospective studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in patients with HFpEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiac contractility modulation （CCM） is a novel treatment method for patients with heart failure. It can enhance myocardial contractility by regulating the concentration of calcium ions in cardiomyocytes and modulating autonomic nerve function， thereby mitigating relevant symptoms， improving exercise tolerance， quality of life， myocardial contractility and ventricular remodeling in patients with heart failure， whereas it does not increase myocardial oxygen consumption. CCM is especially suitable for patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35%-45%. Widespread application of CCM can bring new hope to patients with heart failure. In this article， the mechanism， indications， clinical efficacy and safety of CCM were reviewed， aiming to provide reference for clinicians.

For this reason, the presence of severe right valve insufficiency represents a relative contraindication to CCM therapy; however, in carefully selected cases of functional tricuspid regurgitation, CCM therapy-induced right ventricular reverse remodeling could induce a reduction of the degree of tricuspid regurgitation. Therefore, in patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF, CCM therapy should be considered, as an add-on therapy, after 3 months of optimizing disease-modifier drug therapy [[14]]. In randomized controlled trials, CCM therapy improves functional capacity (i.e. VO2 peak at cardiopulmonary exercise test) [[6]]; also, in a real-world registry, CCM therapy is associated with a lower rate of HF-related hospitalizations [[7]]. Keywords: Cardiac contractility modulation; device therapy; tailored therapy; heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction EN Cardiac contractility modulation device therapy tailored therapy heart failure with reduced ejection fraction heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction 525 528 4 06/20/23 20230701 NES 230701 1. [Extracted from the article]

Heart failure (HF) is a growing issue in developed countries; it is often the result of underlying processes such as ischemia, hypertension, infiltrative diseases or even genetic abnormalities. The great majority of the affected patients present a reduced ejection fraction (≤40%), thereby falling under the name of “heart failure with reduced ejection fraction” (HFrEF). This condition represents a major threat for patients: it significantly affects life quality and carries an enormous burden on the whole healthcare system due to its high management costs. In the last decade, new medical treatments and devices have been developed in order to reduce HF hospitalizations and improve prognosis while reducing the overall mortality rate. Pharmacological therapy has significantly changed our perspective of this disease thanks to its ability of restoring ventricular function and reducing symptom severity, even in some dramatic contexts with an extensively diseased myocardium. Notably, medical therapy can sometimes be ineffective, and a tailored integration with device technologies is of pivotal importance. Not by chance, in recent years, cardiac implantable devices witnessed a significant improvement, thereby providing an irreplaceable resource for the management of HF. Some devices have the ability of assessing (CardioMEMS) or treating (ultrafiltration) fluid retention, while others recognize and treat life-threatening arrhythmias, even for a limited time frame (wearable cardioverter defibrillator). The present review article gives a comprehensive overview of the most recent and important findings that need to be considered in patients affected by HFrEF. Both novel medical treatments and devices are presented and discussed.

Aim. To evaluate the efficacy, safety and effect on the prognosis of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation compared with the group of only optimal drug therapy (ODT) of the 12-month follow-up. Materials and methods. Patients (n=200) were sequentially included in two groups: group 1 patients with CHF who are on ODT in combination with implanted CCM devices (n=100), group 2 comparison patients with CHF who receive only ODT (n=100). Initially and after 12 months, 12-channel electrocardiography (ECG), transthoracic echocardiography, daily ECG-monitoring, determination of the level of NT-proBNP, a six-minute walk test and an assessment of the quality of life according to the Minnesota Questionnaire were performed. Results. In the CCM therapy group, a significant clinical improvement was revealed, which was expressed in the form of a decrease in functional class CHF by NYHA (New York Heart Association), an increase in the distance of a six-minute walk test and an improvement in the quality of life according to Minnesota Questionnaire, as well as an improvement in left ventricle contractile function compared to the ODT group. The absence of a proarrhythmogenic effect of the CCM was shown. There was a significant decrease in the frequency of the readmission due to CHF and the probability of achieving the combined endpoint in the CCM therapy group compared with only ODT. Conclusion. The use of CCM in patients with CHF and atrial fibrillation is an effective and safe method of therapy that leads to the development of reverse remodeling of the myocardium, improves the clinical status of patients and reduces the frequency of readmission due to decompensation of CHF.

Cardiac contractility modulation （CCM） is a novel treatment method for patients with heart failure. It can enhance myocardial contractility by regulating the concentration of calcium ions in cardiomyocytes and modulating autonomic nerve function, thereby mitigating relevant symptoms, improving exercise tolerance, quality of life, myocardial contractility and ventricular remodeling in patients with heart failure, whereas it does not increase myocardial oxygen consumption. CCM is especially suitable for patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35%-45%. Widespread application of CCM can bring new hope to patients with heart failure. In this article, the mechanism, indications, clinical efficacy and safety of CCM were reviewed, aiming to provide reference for clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiac amyloidosis may result in an aggressive form of heart failure (HF). Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) has been shown to be a concrete therapeutic option in patients with symptomatic HF, but there is no evidence of its application in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. We present the case of TTR amyloidosis, where CCM therapy proved to be effective. The patient had a history of multiple HF hospitalizations due to an established diagnosis of wild type TTR-Amyloidosis with significant cardiac involvement. Since he was highly symptomatic, except during continuous dobutamine and diuretic infusion, it was opted to pursue CCM therapy device implantation. At follow up, a significant improvement in clinical status was reported with an increase of EF, functional status (6 min walk test improved from zero meters at baseline, to 270 m at 1 month and to 460 m at 12 months), and a reduction in pulmonary pressures. One year after device implantation, no other HF hospital admission was needed. CCM therapy may be effective in this difficult clinical setting. The AMY-CCM Registry, which has just begun, will evaluate the efficacy of CCM in patients with HF and diagnosed TTR amyloidosis to bring new evidence on its potential impact as a therapeutic option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiology made enormous advances in the treatment of extremely severe diseases such as heart failure. Specifically, interventional cardiology has been enriched, over the years, with increasingly complex aids that have contributed in improving the quality of life and survival of patients suffering from this disease. These advances in technique compel the interventional cardiologist being constantly updated on new procedures and therapy. As a result, both the ward nurses and those supporting the cardiologist in the surgery room, must acquire the knowledge that allows them to be always in step with the fast-changing times. The aim of this commentary is to underlining the importance of a continuous updating of nurses by emphasizing that their role has been changing over the years and that these professionals, along with the physicians, must stay up-to-date regarding technological innovations, within the limits of their specific skills.

Hypotension is often in chronic heart failure patients. It has various reasons, including a decrease in the pumping function of the heart, medications, altered vasoreactivity associated with concomitant diseases (for example, diabetes mellitus). There are no universal criteria for assessing the severity of hypotension. Its prognosis significance has not been studied well. It is difficult to select and titrate the drugs recommended for treatment of heart failure, so that the prescribed therapy compensates the patient and does not cause the development of side effects. Step–by–step algorithms for prescribing and correcting drug therapy for heart failure patients with hypotension have been developed. This article presents a clinical case of management of a patient with severe hypotension and chronic heart failure with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.Aortic valve replacement was performed the patient with congenital heart disease (bicuspid aortic valve) in 25 years. In 13 years, after a viral infection, there was a decompensation of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction to 19%. Against the optimal drug therapy, heart failure persisted III– IV functional class with 4 hospitalization during a year. Despite the indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy, a system for modulating cardiac contractility was implanted, after which there was no improvement in clinical symptoms, there were frequent decompensations up to. In order to prevent the progression of the disease and improve the prognosis, despite hypotension, sacubitril/valsartan was prescribed, against which it was possible to compensate the patient and achieve a stable course of chronic heart failure without the need for hospitalization for 9 months. This case report suggest that additional clinical researches are necessary to study the possibility of prescribing of small doses of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with hypotension and heart failure to reduce the severity of clinical symptoms and to improve the prognosis.

Metabolic remodeling contributes to the pathological process of heart failure (HF). We explored the effects of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) on myocardial metabolic remodeling in the rabbit model with HF. The HF in rabbit model was established by pressure uploading and then CCM was applied. We evaluated the cardiac structure and function by echocardiography, serum BNP level, and hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s trichrome staining. We detected the accumulation of glycogen and lipid droplets in myocardial tissues by periodic acid-Schiff and Oil Red O staining. Then, we measured the contents of glucose, free fatty acid (FFA), lactic acid, pyruvate, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels in myocardial tissues by corresponding kits and the expression levels of key factors related to myocardial substrate uptake and utilization by western blotting were analyzed. CCM significantly restored the cardiac structure and function in the rabbit model with HF. CCM therapy further decreased the accumulation of glycogen and lipid droplets. Furthermore, CCM reduced the contents of FFA, glucose, and lactic acid, and increased pyruvate and ATP levels in HF tissues. The protein expression levels related to myocardial substrate uptake and utilization were markedly improved with CCM treatment by further activating adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α signaling pathways.

Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) has been proposed for inpatients affected by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with relapsing HF symptoms. We present a case of a patient treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST-segment elevation, with the best medical therapy for decompensated HF. The patient refused the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and to reduce the increasing number of hospitalizations for HF exacerbations, we proposed the use of the cardiac contractility modulation device. After the implant, the patient demonstrated a marked improvement in exercise effort and quality of life (QOL) with a six-minute walk test (SMWT), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ), and echocardiographic parameters. At 9 months after discharge, no hospital admissions for HF were recorded. We showed with the speckle tracking imaging how the improvement in global longitudinal strain (GLS) correlates with the remodeling effects on myocardial cells.

Background: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an innovative therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction delivered by a cardiac implantable device (Optimizer Smart®). One of the most prominent periprocedural complications common to all cardiac implantable devices (CIDs) is tricuspid regurgitation (TR) due to the placement of the right ventricular endocardial leads. To date, no published studies have assessed the changes in the TR degree in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) after the implantation of cardiac contractility modulation therapy devices. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the implantation of the trans-tricuspid leads required to deliver CCM therapy on the severity of TR in patients with HFrEF who previously underwent ICD implantation. Methods: We enrolled 30 HFrEF patients who underwent CCM therapy between November 2020 and October 2021. For all the patients, echocardiographic evaluations of TR were performed according to current guidelines 24 h before and six months after the Optimizer Smart® implant was applied. Results: At the 6-month follow-up, the grade of TR remained unchanged compared to the preimplant grade. The value of the vena contracta (VC) of TR was 0.40 ± 0.19 cm in the preimplant period and 0.45 ± 0.21 cm at the 6-month follow-up (p = 0.33). Similarly, the TR proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) radius value was unchanged at follow-up (0.54 ± 0.22 cm vs. 0.62 ± 0.20 cm; p = 0.18). No statistically significant difference existed between the preimplant VC and PISA radius values, irrespective of the device type. Conclusions: The implantation of right ventricular electrodes for the delivery of CCM therapy did not worsen tricuspid regurgitation in patients with HFrEF and ICD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This pilot study aimed to assess the potential benefits of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and results: This was a prospective, multicentre, single‐arm, pilot study of CCM therapy in patients with HFpEF and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III. Echocardiographic parameters were measured by an echo core laboratory to determine study eligibility. After CCM device implantation, patients were followed for 24 weeks. Overall, 47 patients (mean age 74.3 ± 4.4 years, 70.2% female) were enrolled, with left ventricular ejection fraction of 59 ± 4.4%, 63.8% with hypertension, 46.8% with atrial fibrillation, 40.4% with diabetes, 31.9% with at least one heart failure hospitalization in the prior year, 61.7% in NYHA class III, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall summary score of 48.9 ± 21.7. The primary efficacy endpoint (mean change in the KCCQ overall summary score) improved by 18.0 ± 16.6 points (p < 0.001) and there was an event‐free rate of 93.6% for the primary safety endpoint (device‐ and procedure‐related complications), as adjudicated by an independent physician committee. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates that the benefits of CCM may extend to the HFpEF patient population. The significant improvement in health status observed, with no obvious impact on safety, suggests that utilization of CCM for patients with HFpEF could prove to be promising. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• In subgroup analysis of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, benefits were observed in patients with higher ejection fraction and mildly reduced ejection fraction. • Growing evidence demonstrates both an inotropic and lusitropic effect of CCM therapy, which may translate to a therapeutic benefit in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. • A randomized controlled trial is warranted to further investigate the efficacy of CCM therapy in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Cardiac contractility modulation (also known as CCM) is a novel device therapy that delivers nonexcitatory electric stimulation to cardiac myocytes during the absolute refractory period, and it has been shown to improve functional status and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). CCM therapy is currently recommended for a subset of patients with advanced HFrEF who are not candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. A growing body of evidence demonstrates the benefit of CCM therapy in patients with HFrEF and with ejection fraction at the upper end of the spectrum and in patients with HF and with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Experimental studies have also observed reversal of pathological biomolecular intracellular changes with CCM therapy in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), indicating the potential for clinically meaningful benefits of CCM therapy in these patients. In this review, we sought to discuss the basis of CCM therapy and its potential for management of patients with HF with higher ejection fractions. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Novel cardiac devices, including the MitraClip system, occluder devices, leadless pacemakers, and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD), are mostly used in the management of patients who are at high risk for surgery and/or developing infections. Several mechanisms render most of these devices resistant to infection, including avoiding long transvenous access and novel manufacturing material. Since subjects who use these devices already endure several comorbid conditions, uncommon cases of device-associated infection could result in serious complications and increased mortality. In this review, we aim to summarize the current state of evidence on the incidence, clinical presentation, management, and prognosis of new cardiac devices' associated infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an FDA-approved device therapy for patients with refractory systolic heart failure and normal QRS width. Randomized trials demonstrated benefits of CCM primarily for patients with severe heart failure (> NYHA class II). Purpose: To better understand individualized indication in clinical practice, we compared the effect of CCM in patients with baseline NYHA class II vs. NYHA class III or ambulatory IV over the 5-year period in our large clinical registry (MAINTAINED Observational Study). Methods: Changes in NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), NT-proBNP level, and KDIGO chronic kidney disease stage were compared as functional parameters. In addition, mortality within 3 years was compared with the prediction of the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic heart failure risk score. Results: A total of 172 patients were included in the analyses (10% with NYHA class II). Only patients with NYHA class III/IV showed a significant improvement in NYHA class over 5 years of CCM (II: 0.1 ± 0.6; p = 0.96 vs. III/IV: − 0.6 ± 0.6; p < 0.0001). In both groups, LVEF improved significantly (II: 4.7 ± 8.3; p = 0.0072 vs. III/IV: 7.0 ± 10.7%; p < 0.0001), while TAPSE improved significantly only in NYHA class III/IV patients (II: 2.2 ± 1.6; p = 0.20 vs. III/IV: 1.8 ± 5.2 mm; p = 0.0397). LVEF improvement was comparable in both groups over 5 years of CCM (p = 0.83). NYHA class II patients had significantly lower NT-proBNP levels at baseline (858 [175/6887] vs. 2632 [17/28830] ng/L; p = 0.0044), which was offset under therapy (399 [323/1497] vs. 901 [13/18155] ng/L; p = 0.61). Actual 3-year mortality was 17 and 26% vs. a predicted mortality of 31 and 42%, respectively (p = 0.0038 for NYHA class III/IV patients). Conclusions: NYHA class III/IV patients experienced more direct and extensive functional improvements with CCM and a survival benefit compared with the predicted risk. However, our data suggest that NYHA class II patients may also benefit from the sustained positive effects of LVEF improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure (HF), the final manifestation of most cardiovascular diseases, has become a major global health concern, affecting millions of individuals. Despite basic drug treatments, patients present with high morbidity and mortality rates. However, recent advancements in interventional therapy have shown promising results in improving the prognosis of patients with HF. These advancements include transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, transcatheter mitral valve repair for chronic mitral regurgitation, neuromodulation therapy for multiple targets and measures in the treatment of chronic HF and left ventricular assist device implantation for advanced HF (Figure 1). In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of the current progress in interventional therapies for chronic HF., (© 2024 The Author(s). ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Aim. To study the effect of cardiac contractility modulation on reverse remodeling and myocardial function in patients with chronic heart failure (HF) according to echocardiography (EchoCG). Materials and methods. In a group of 40 patients with a combination of chronic HF and atrial fibrillation (AF), the dynamics of standard EchoCG parameters and the effectiveness of myocardial work of the left ventricle (LV) against the background of 12-month therapy of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) were analyzed. Results. The results obtained indicate a statistically significant positive effect of CCM on LV remodeling parameters and the effectiveness of myocardial work according to EchoCG. Conclusion. Transthoracic echocardiography is the main imaging method and provides great opportunities for evaluating the effectiveness of HF treatment, including non-drug methods such as CCM. Evaluation of LV myocardial function in patients with HF and implanted CCM devices is a promising scientific and practical research method.

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a novel device-based therapy used in patients with HFrEF. CCM therapy is associated with an improvement in exercise tolerance, increased quality of life, reduced HF hospitalizations, and reverse remodelling of the left ventricle in patients with HFrEF. In this case, we report the clinical benefit of CCM in an older patient with advanced HFrEF due to ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with frequent heart failure-related hospitalizations and poor quality of life despite optimal medical therapy.

An 82-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and Medtronic biventricular ICD presented with shortness of breath. His ECG is presented with shortness of breath. ECG shows atrial sensed, electronic ventricular pacing. At the end of each QRS complex there is another pacemaker stimulus. This represents typical case of cardiac contractility modulation therapy and not pacemaker malfunction, [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Virtually all patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction have a reduction of myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency (MEE). Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a novel therapy for the treatment of patients with HFrEF, in whom it improves the quality of life and functional capacity, reduces hospitalizations, and induces biventricular reverse remodeling. However, the effects of CCM on MEE and global longitudinal strain (GLS) are still unknown; therefore, this study aims to evaluate whether CCM therapy can improve the MEE of patients with HFrEF. Methods: We enrolled 25 patients with HFrEF who received an Optimizer Smart implant (the device that develops CCM therapy) between January 2018 and January 2021. Clinical and echocardiographic evaluations were performed in all patients 24 h before and six months after CCM therapy. Results: At six months, follow-up patients who underwent CCM therapy showed an increase of left ventricular ejection fraction (30.8 ± 7.1 vs. 36.1 ± 6.9%; p = 0.032) as well a rise of GLS 10.3 ± 2.7 vs. −12.9 ± 4.2; p = 0.018), of MEE (32.2 ± 10.1 vs. 38.6 ± 7.6 mL/s; p = 0.013) and of MEE index (18.4 ± 6.3 vs. 24.3 ± 6.7 mL/s/g; p = 0.022). Conclusions: CCM therapy increased left ventricular performance, improving left ventricular ejection fraction, GLS, as well as MEE and MEEi. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a novel device-based therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced and mild reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF). CCM increases cardiac performance and produces reverse left ventricular remodeling, with improved symptoms, functional capacity, quality of life, and reduced HF-related hospitalizations. However, to date, little evidence is available on the effects of CCM on right ventricle (RV) function. Therefore, we analyzed the effects of CCM on RV systolic function and RV–pulmonary artery (PA) coupling. Methods. Twenty-one (65 ± 12.5 years) patients with NYHA class III, ejection fraction < 40% and QRS < 120 ms were assessed at baseline. During follow up, two patients had died, and so nineteen patients were evaluated six months after CCM therapy. Using echocardiography, tricuspid annular systolic excursion (TAPSE), myocardial systolic excursion velocity (RVs), and RV free-wall strain was measured. PA systolic pressure (PASP) was estimated from tricuspid regurgitation, adding the right atrial pressure estimation. The RV-PA coupling was calculated as TAPSE/PASP ratio. Results. After six months, patients who underwent CCM therapy showed a reduction in RV diameters and improved RV systolic function, as evidenced by the increase in both TAPSE (16.6 ± 4.2 mm vs. 18.5 ± 3.6 mm; p < 0.05), RVs (10.1 ± 1.8 cm/s vs. 11.3 ± 11.4 cm/s; p < 0.05), and RV strain (−13.7 ± 1.8% vs. −15.6 ± 2.3%; p < 0.05). CCM also determined a reduction in PASP (34.2 ± 9.8 mmHg vs. 28 ± 6.2 mmHg; p < 0.05) and an increase in the TAPSE/PASP ratio (0.52 ± 0.14 mm/mmHg vs. 0.66 ± 0.23 mm/mmHg; p < 0.05). Conclusions. At six months, CCM increases RV reverse remodeling and performance, reducing RV size and improving RV systolic function, PASP, and RV-PA coupling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. To evaluate the dynamics of cardiac arrhythmias on the background of cardiac contractility modulation (MCC) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and various forms of atrial fibrillation (AF) on the basis of daily electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. Materials and methods. In 100 patients with CHF and AF, the following studies were performed before implantation of the MCC device and after 12 months of follow-up: 12-channel ECG with an estimate of the width of the QRS complex, transthoracic echocardiography (EchoCG), and Holter ECG monitoring. All patients received long-term optimal drug therapy for CHF before surgery. Results. The results obtained indicate that there is no effect of MCC on the development and progression of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CHF and AF during the year of follow-up, both extrasystole and tachyarrhythmias, regardless of the etiology and LVEF (less than 35% or more than 35%), and a decrease in the frequency of AF paroxysms in patients with CHF during treatment. These results are due to the reverse remodeling of the LV myocardium under the influence of the MCC device. Conclusion. The use of MСС in patients with CHF and AF is a safe method of therapy that does not induce cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular extrasystole. Large-scale comparative studies are required to evaluate these results.

IntroductionCatheter ablation (CA) is the current standard of care for patients suffering drug-refractory monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (MMVTs). Yet, despite significant technological improvements, recurrences remain common, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is increasingly being adopted to overcome the limitations of conventional CA, but its safety and efficacy are still under evaluation.Case presentationWe hereby present the case of a 73-year-old patient implanted with a mitral valve prosthesis, a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator, and a cardiac contractility modulation device, who was successfully treated with STAR for recurrent drug and CA-resistant MMVT in the setting of advanced heart failure and a giant left atrium. We report a 2-year follow-up and a detailed dosimetric analysis.ConclusionOur case report supports the early as well as the long-term efficacy of 25 Gy single-session STAR. Despite the concomitant severe heart failure, with an overall heart minus planned target volume mean dosage below 5 Gy, no major detrimental cardiac side effects were detected. To the best of our knowledge, our dosimetric analysis is the most accurate reported so far in the setting of STAR, particularly for what concerns cardiac substructures and coronary arteries. A shared dosimetric planning among centers performing STAR will be crucial in the next future to fully disclose its safety profile.

Background: According to numerous studies, from 30% to 50% of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) are resistant to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and cardiac contractility modulation (CCM), despite their careful selection in accordance with current guidelines. It is of interest to study neurohormones characterizing myocardial (NT-proBNP) and fibrosis (sST2) as potential additional markers of CHF patients' “response” to CRT and CCM.Aim: To evaluate the potential to use NT-proBNP and sST2 biomarkers in CHF patients combined with transthoracic echocardiography (Echo) and contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters of the heart to predict a positive response to CRT and CCM devices.Materials and methods: The study included 51 patients (41 men, 10 women) aged 58 ± 12 years (26 to 79 years) with ischemic heart disease post acute myocardial infarction (n = 22) or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 29), left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction (EF) < 35%, and CHF II–III NYHA functional class despite ≥ 3 months of optimized medical therapy. The patients were assessed by serum biomarkers NT-proBNP and sST2 measurements, transthoracic Echo, and contrast- enhanced cardiac MRI. After the diagnostic assessment, CRT defibrillators (CRT-D) were implanted to 39 patients and CCM to 12 patients. After prospective follow-up of the patients for 18 to 24 months, predictors of the response to each device type were analyzed in univariate, multivariate, and ROC analysis.Results: The response to CRT-D was found in 21 (54%) patients, to CCM in 7 (58%) patients. Multivariate analysis showed the following predictors of the response of patients to CRT-D were: 1) sST2 < 50 ng/mL, 2) NT-proBNP < 3900 pg/mL, 3) < 3 LV segments with fibrosis (by MRI) and 4) anteroposterior dimension of the left atrium < 4.8 cm (by Echo). Any 2 of these 4 characteristics made it possible to predict the response to CRT with an accuracy of 87% (sensitivity 90%, specificity 83%). The predictors of the response to CCM were: 1) sST2 < 30 ng/ml, 2) LV end diastolic diameter < 78 mm (Echo), 3) age < 56 years, 4) body mass index < 27 kg/m2. Any 2 of these 4 characteristics predicted the positive response to CCM with an accuracy of 92% (sensitivity 86%, specificity 100%).Conclusion: The preoperative sST2 level was the only universal marker of the response to either CRT (< 50 ng/mL) or CCM (< 30 ng/mL) devices in CHF patients with reduced LVEF. The results indicate the potential for improved efficacy of these devices with their earlier implantation after the onset of the heart disease, as well as provided that maximal control CHF in these patients has been achieved.

Background: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM), being reserved for patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) and narrow QRS complex under guideline directed medical therapy, can recover initially reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); however, the influence of pre‐implantation LVEF on long‐term outcomes is not fully understood. This study aimed to compare the effects of lower and higher preimplantation LVEF on long‐term outcomes in CCM‐therapy. Methods: One‐hundred seventy‐two patients from our single‐centre registry were retrospectively included (2002–2019). Follow‐up data were collected up to 5 years after implantation. Patients were divided into Group 1 (baseline LVEF≤ 30%) and Group 2 (≥ 31%). Both groups were compared based on differences in survival, echocardiographic‐ and clinical parameters including LVEF, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), NYHA class or Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire‐score (MLWHFQ). Results: 11% of the patients did have a LVEF ≥31%. Mean LVEF ± SD for both groups were 21.98 ± 5.4 versus 35.2 ± 3.7%, respectively. MLWHFQ (47 ± 21.2 vs. 42±21.4) and mean peak oxygen consumption (VO2, 13.6 ± 4.1 vs. 12.7 ± 2.8 ml/kg/min) were comparable between both groups. LVEF‐grouping did not influence survival. Lower baseline LVEF resulted in significantly better recovery of echocardiographic parameters such as LVEF and TAPSE. Irrespective from baseline LVEF, both groups showed nearly comparable improvements for clinical parameters like NYHA‐class and MLWHFQ. Conclusion: Long‐term biventricular systolic recovery potential in CCM‐therapy might be better for preimplantation LVEF values ≤30%, whereas clinical parameters such as NYHA‐class can improve irrespective from baseline LVEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiac contractility modulation is an innovative therapy conceived for the treatment of heart failure. It is a device-based therapy, employing multiple electrodes to deliver relatively high-voltage (~7.5 V) biphasic signals to the endocardium of the right ventricular septum, in order to improve heart failure symptoms, exercise capacity and quality of life. Multiple clinical and mechanistic studies have been conducted to investigate the potential usefulness of this technology and, as of now, they suggest that it could have a place in therapy and meet a relevant medical need for a specific sub-category of underserved heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. More studies are needed to further investigate its effect on outcomes such as mortality and rate of hospitalizations.

Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) has been proposed for inpatients affected by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with relapsing HF symptoms. We present a case of a patient treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST-segment elevation, with the best medical therapy for decompensated HF. The patient refused the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and to reduce the increasing number of hospitalizations for HF exacerbations, we proposed the use of the cardiac contractility modulation device. After the implant, the patient demonstrated a marked improvement in exercise effort and quality of life (QOL) with a six-minute walk test (SMWT), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ), and echocardiographic parameters. At 9 months after discharge, no hospital admissions for HF were recorded. We showed with the speckle tracking imaging how the improvement in global longitudinal strain (GLS) correlates with the remodeling effects on myocardial cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aims Increasing attention is being given to patients with heart failure and ‘mid‐range’ left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, ≥40% and

Abstract Aims Cardiac contractility modulation, also referred to as CCM™, has emerged as a promising device treatment for heart failure (HF) in patients not indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy. We performed a comprehensive individual patient data meta‐analysis of all non‐confounded prospective randomized controlled trials of CCM vs. control that have measured functional capacity and/or quality of life questionnaires in patients with HF. Methods and results The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched in January 2020 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. We also asked the sole manufacturer of the device for their list of known trials. Primary outcomes of interest were peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2), 6 min walk test distance, and quality of life measured by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ), and all data were received as individual patient and individual time point data‐points. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous data using a fixed‐effects model. Five trials were identified, four randomized studies enrolling 801 participants for all endpoints of interest, and for peak VO2 alone (n = 60), there was an additional single arm non‐randomized trial (FIX‐HF‐5C2) with a prospective comparison of its 24 week peak VO2 data compared with the control group of the FIX‐HF‐5C control patients. Pooled analysis showed that, compared with control, CCM significantly improved peak VO2 (mean difference +0.93, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.30 mL/kg/min, P

During the last years, the management of heart failure (HF) made substantial progress, focusing on device-based therapies to meet the demands of this complex syndrome. In this case report, we present a multistep approach to deal with HF. Specifically, we report the first patient subjected to the implantation of both Optimizer Smart® (Impulse Dynamics Inc., Marlton, NJ, USA) and CardioMEMS devices. A 72-year-old male patient with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was admitted to our cardiology department in January 2021, following a progressive shortening of the time between hospitalizations for levosimendan infusions. Specifically, the patient was monitored daily by CardioMEMS, and a strategy of levosimendan infusions guided by the device had been adopted. He was also a carrier of MitraClips and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) and had optimized HF medical therapy. In January 2021, the patient implanted Optimizer Smart® device for cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy because of poor response to therapy and elevated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP). CCM significantly reduced PAP values following discharge (systolic PAP 33.67 ± 2.92 vs. 40.6 ± 3.37 mmHg, diastolic PAP 14.5 ± 2.01 vs. 22.5 ± 2.53 mmHg, mean PAP 22.87 ± 2.20 vs. 30.9 ± 2.99 mmHg, HR 60.93 ± 1.53 vs. 80.83 ± 3.66 bpm; p < 0.0001), with persisting effect at 9 months. The usefulness of CCM is objectively demonstrated for the first time by continuous invasive monitoring of PAP by CardioMEMS, which can suggest the correct timing for CCM implantation.

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a novel device-based therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In randomized clinical trials and real-life studies, CCM has been shown to improve exercise tolerance and quality of life, reverse left ventricular remodeling and reduce hospitalization in patients with HFrEF. In this case report, we describe for the first time the use of CCM as a “bridge to transplant” in a young obese patient with advanced heart failure due to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. The patient had a poor quality of life and frequent heart failure-related hospitalizations despite the optimal medical therapy and, due to obesity, a suitable heart donor was unlikely to be identified in the short term and due to severe obesity risk of complications after implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was very high.

Aim. To study myocardial remodeling in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) against the background of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy.Material and methods. In a group of 100 patients with HFrEF and AF, transthoracic echocardiography was performed before CCM device implantation and after 2, 6 and 12 months. All patients received longterm optimal medical therapy for HF before surgery.Results. Against the background of CCM therapy, there was a significant increase in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, a decrease in LV volume and linear dimensions, a decrease in left atrial volume in patients with coronary and non-coronary HFrEF, with an initial LVEF 35%, and also regardless of AF type.Conclusion. CCM therapy in patients with HFrEF and AF led to favorable myocardial remodeling changes. Further study of CCM effect on echocardiographic parameters in randomized clinical trials is needed.