1. Patient-Reported Quality of Life After Resection With Primary Closure for Oral Tongue Carcinoma.
- Author
-
Ochoa E, Larson AR, Han M, Webb KL, Stanford-Moore GB, El-Sayed IH, George JR, Ha PK, Heaton CM, and Ryan WR
- Subjects
- Academic Medical Centers, Adult, Aged, Carcinoma in Situ physiopathology, Carcinoma in Situ surgery, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell physiopathology, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell surgery, Deglutition, Female, Humans, Male, Mastication, Middle Aged, Oral Surgical Procedures methods, Pain Measurement, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Postoperative Period, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Speech, Surveys and Questionnaires, Taste, Tongue Neoplasms physiopathology, Tongue Neoplasms surgery, Treatment Outcome, Carcinoma in Situ psychology, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell psychology, Oral Surgical Procedures psychology, Quality of Life, Tongue Neoplasms psychology
- Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis: For early-stage oral tongue carcinoma and carcinoma in situ (ESOTCCIS), we evaluated patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes following resection with primary closure (R-PC)., Study Design: Retrospective review at an academic cancer center., Methods: Thirty-nine ESOTCCIS patients (Tis, T1, T2) who underwent R-PC without radiation completed the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 4 (UW-QOL) at least 6 months since R-PC (mean = 2.39 years; range = 0.5-6.7 years). We compared UW-QOL scores for pain, swallowing, chewing, speech, and taste to established normative population scores. Multivariable regression analysis evaluated factors associated with QOL impairment., Results: ESOTCCIS patients who underwent R-PC in comparison to the normative population reported significantly worse mean speech (87.7 vs. 98, P < .001) and taste (85.6 vs. 95, P = .002) scores and no significant differences in mean pain (91.7 vs. 86, P = .96), swallowing (100 vs. 98, P = .98), chewing (97.4 vs. 94, P = .98) scores. For speech and taste, 59% (23/39) reported no postoperative change from baseline, whereas 41% (16/39) and 35.9% (14/39) reported mild impairment, respectively. Overall, postoperative QOL was reported as good, very good, or outstanding by 87.2% (34/39). Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, cT1 compared to CIS, and ventral tongue involvement were independently associated with worse speech. Age < 60 years was independently associated with worse taste., Conclusions: ESOTCCIS patients who undergo R-PC without radiation can expect long-term swallowing, chewing, and pain to be in the normative range. Although a majority of patients can expect to achieve normative speech and taste outcomes, R-PC carries the risks of mild speech and/or taste impairments., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:312-318, 2021., (© 2020 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF