1. Lenvatinib, sintilimab combined interventional treatment vs bevacizumab, sintilimab combined interventional treatment for intermediate-advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
- Author
-
Han RY, Gan LJ, Lang MR, Ren SH, Liu DM, Li GT, Liu YY, Tian XD, Zhu KW, Sun LY, Chen L, and Song TQ
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Adult, Neoplasm Staging, Treatment Outcome, Chemoembolization, Therapeutic methods, Chemoembolization, Therapeutic adverse effects, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular mortality, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular pathology, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular drug therapy, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular therapy, Liver Neoplasms pathology, Liver Neoplasms drug therapy, Liver Neoplasms mortality, Liver Neoplasms therapy, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Bevacizumab therapeutic use, Bevacizumab administration & dosage, Bevacizumab adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Progression-Free Survival, Quinolines therapeutic use, Quinolines adverse effects, Quinolines administration & dosage, Phenylurea Compounds therapeutic use, Phenylurea Compounds adverse effects, Phenylurea Compounds administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: Bevacizumab and sintilimab combined interventional treatment (BeSiIT) and L envatinib and sintilimab combined interventional treatment (LeSiIT) are two commonly used therapeutic regimens for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in clinical practice., Aim: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of BeSiIT and LeSiIT for the treatment of intermediate and advanced HCC., Methods: Patients diagnosed with intermediate-advanced HCC and initially treated with BeSiIT or LeSiIT in the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between February 2020 and July 2021 were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion rate, and treatment-related adverse events., Results: Total 127 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into BeSiIT and LeSiIT groups. Twenty-eight and fifty patients in the BeSiIT and LeSiIT groups, respectively, were assessed after 1:2 propensity score matching. PFS and OS rates were not significantly different between the two groups. No significant variations were noted in ORRs or DCRs according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and modified RECIST. BeSiIT group showed a better conversion rate than the LeSiIT group ( P = 0.043). Both groups showed manageable toxicity profiles. Multivariate analysis showed that the independent factors associated with PFS were alpha-fetoprotein levels and carcinoembryonic antigen score., Conclusion: In intermediate-to-advanced HCC, the BeSiIT and LeSiIT groups exhibited acceptable toxicities and comparable PFS, OS, and ORR., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF