Search

Background: There are defects in the existing classification of capitellar cartilage injury (CCI) concomitant with radial head fracture (RHF). This study aimed to introduce a comprehensive classification of CCI and to analyze its surgical guidance value. Methods: According to the affected site and severity, CCI was classified into four types: Type I - partial-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type II - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type III - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with subchondral bone loss, Type IV - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with thin cortex loss on the border of the capitellum; Different types suggest different surgical methods. Between January 2017 and January 2023, this comprehensive CCI classification was applied in 31 operated patients with CCI concomitant with RHF. The ranges of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, were used to evaluate the functional recovery of the affected limb. Results: Mason Type I-IV RHF accounted for 6.45%, 38.71%, 48.39%, and 6.45%, respectively. Type I-IV CCI accounted for 12.90%, 35.48%, 45.16% and 6.45%, respectively. There was no relationship between the CCI and RHF types (p > 0.05). At the end of the follow-up period of 11–26 months with an average of 16 months, the elbow flexion and extension ROM recovered to (147.39 ± 9.84)°, forearm rotation ROM recovered to (168.74 ± 11.70)°, MEPI score recovered to (89.19 ± 4.17), HSS score recovered to (88.74 ± 4.62), VAS score recovered to (0.50 ± 0.57), indicating significant differences compared to preoperative measurements (p < 0.05). According to the MEPI and HSS scores, the excellent and good rate of functional recovery was 100%. Conclusion: Different types of CCI differ not only in pathology but also in treatment methods. Surgical strategy according to the comprehensive CCI classification introduced in this paper may lead to a satisfactory outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background There are defects in the existing classification of capitellar cartilage injury (CCI) concomitant with radial head fracture (RHF). This study aimed to introduce a comprehensive classification of CCI and to analyze its surgical guidance value. Methods According to the affected site and severity, CCI was classified into four types: Type I - partial-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type II - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type III - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with subchondral bone loss, Type IV - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with thin cortex loss on the border of the capitellum; Different types suggest different surgical methods. Between January 2017 and January 2023, this comprehensive CCI classification was applied in 31 operated patients with CCI concomitant with RHF. The ranges of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, were used to evaluate the functional recovery of the affected limb. Results Mason Type I-IV RHF accounted for 6.45%, 38.71%, 48.39%, and 6.45%, respectively. Type I-IV CCI accounted for 12.90%, 35.48%, 45.16% and 6.45%, respectively. There was no relationship between the CCI and RHF types (p > 0.05). At the end of the follow-up period of 11–26 months with an average of 16 months, the elbow flexion and extension ROM recovered to (147.39 ± 9.84)°, forearm rotation ROM recovered to (168.74 ± 11.70)°, MEPI score recovered to (89.19 ± 4.17), HSS score recovered to (88.74 ± 4.62), VAS score recovered to (0.50 ± 0.57), indicating significant differences compared to preoperative measurements (p

Background: Capitellar injury (CI) includes capitellar cartilage injury (CCI) and capitellar fracture (CF). A comprehensive classification of CI concurrent with radial head fracture (RHF) that can guide surgical strategy is lacking in the literature. Therefore, this study aimed to introduce a comprehensive classification of CI concurrent with RHF and investigate its value., Methods: A total of 35 patients with CI concurrent with RHF confirmed by surgical exploration were retrospectively analyzed, includingmales in 19 cases and females in 16 cases. RHF was classified according to the Mason classification, and CI was classified into six types, including 3 types of CCI and CF, each based on the site and degrees of injuries (comprehensive classification method proposed in this study). The classification results were analyzed. Two radiologists were selected to independently classify the CI, and the inter- and intra-observer agreements were analyzed with kappa statistics., Results: Mason Type I, II, III, and IV RHF accounted for 14.3%, 48.6%, 37.1%, and 0% of cases, respectively. Type I, II, III, IV, V, and VI CIs accounted for 22.9%, 34.3%, 25.7%, 11.4%, 2.9%, and 2.9% of cases, respectively. Therewas no obvious relationship between the CI and RHF types (p > 0.05). All Type I CIs underwent removal, 9 Type II CIs underwent microfracture repair, and 3 Type II CIs underwent removal. All Type III CIs underwent fixation, one Type IV CI underwent removal, and 3 Type IV CIs underwent fixation, one Type V CI underwent fixation, and one Type VI CI underwent arthroplasty. The inter- and intra-observer kappa coefficients were 0.830 ~ 0.905 and 0.805 ~ 0.892, respectively. At 12 months postoperatively, the elbow function evaluated by MEPS was 91, with an excellent and good rate of 97%., Conclusion: Different types of CI differ not only in pathology but also in treatment methods. The CI comprehensive classification put forth in this paper for the first time reflects different types of pathology well, with high consistency and repeatability, and can guide the selection of surgical methods, leading to satisfactory postoperative results.