Search

Background: Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy is an increasingly accepted alternative for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). 1 However, the ability to perform a meticulous robotic-assisted superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection to obtain a margin-negative resection remains unknown. 2 PDAC within the head of the pancreas (HOP) that involves the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and portal vein (PV) requires total venous control (TVC) and a 'vein-to-the-right' (or anterior artery-first) approach to SMA dissection to minimize venous congestion and operative blood loss. 3-5 Here, we demonstrate a robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with TVC and a 'vein-to-the-right' approach., Methods: A 70-year-old woman with cT2N0M0 HOP PDAC with lateral SMV involvement and right gastroepiploic vein occlusion underwent robotic pancreatoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After transecting the pancreas, we achieved TVC by dividing the small venous tributaries and encircling the SMV, splenic vein, and PV. We then proceeded with a 'vein-to-the-right' approach. The inferior pancreatoduodenal arteries were divided to minimize HOP inflow and decrease specimen bleeding. Once the specimen was dissected off the periadventitial plane of the distal SMA, the SMV dissection was carefully performed using a partial side-wall vein resection using a vascular stapler., Results: Total operative time was 7.5 h and estimated blood loss was 25 mL. The patient recovered well postoperatively and was discharged on postoperative day 3. Final pathology exhibited a 2.4 cm, moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with negative margins (ypT2N1, 2/38 lymph nodes positive)., Conclusion: For tumors with lateral vein involvement, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy can be safely performed via TVC and a 'vein-to-the-right' approach., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Although escalated doses of radiation therapy (RT) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) are associated with durable local control (LC) and prolonged survival, uncertainties persist regarding personalized RT based on biological factors. Compounding this knowledge gap, the assessment of RT response using traditional size-based criteria via computed tomography (CT) imaging correlates poorly with outcomes. We hypothesized that quantitative measures of enhancement would more accurately predict clinical outcomes than size-based assessment alone and developed a model to optimize RT., Methods: Pre-RT and post-RT CT scans of 154 patients with iCCA were analyzed retrospectively for measurements of tumor dimensions (for RECIST) and viable tumor volume using quantitative European Association for Study of Liver (qEASL) measurements. Binary classification and survival analyses were performed to evaluate the ability of qEASL to predict treatment outcomes, and mathematical modeling was performed to identify the mechanistic determinants of treatment outcomes and to predict optimal RT protocols., Results: Multivariable analysis accounting for traditional prognostic covariates revealed that percentage change in viable volume following RT was significantly associated with OS, outperforming stratification by RECIST. Binary classification identified ≥33% decrease in viable volume to optimally correspond to response to RT. The model-derived, patient-specific tumor enhancement growth rate emerged as the dominant mechanistic determinant of treatment outcome and yielded high accuracy of patient stratification (80.5%), strongly correlating with the qEASL-based classifier., Conclusion: Following RT for iCCA, changes in viable volume outperformed radiographic size-based assessment using RECIST for OS prediction. CT-derived tumor-specific mathematical parameters may help optimize RT for resistant tumors., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: BD reports honoraria from Sermo, Inc and funding from the Radiological Society of North America. EBH reports grants from Merck Serono. CMT reports a consulting/advisory role with Accuray. ACK reports ownership of shares in Aravive, Inc. PD reports honoraria from ASTRO, ASCO, Imedex, and Bayer. EJK reports grants from National Institutes of Health, Stand Up 2 Cancer, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Philips Healthcare, Elekta, and GE Healthcare; personal fees from RenovoRx and Taylor and Francis; and a consulting/advisory role with Augmenix. All reported conflicts are outside the current work.

Background: Lymphatic spread of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is common and negatively impacts survival. However, the precise role of lymph node dissection (LND) in oncologic outcomes for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains to be established., Methods: Updated evidence on the preoperative diagnosis and prognostic value of lymph node metastasis is reviewed, as well as the potential benefit of LND in patients with iCCA., Results: The ability to accurately determine nodal status for iCCA with current imaging modalities is equivocal. LND has prognostic value for both survival and disease recurrence. However, execution rates of LND are highly varied in the literature, ranging from 26.9 to 100%. At least 6 lymph nodes should be examined from nodal stations of the hepatoduodenal ligament and hepatic artery as well as based on the location of the primary tumor. Neoadjuvant therapies may be beneficial if lymph node metastases at diagnosis are suspected. Surgeons performing a minimally invasive approach should focus on increasing LND rates and harvesting ≥ 6 lymph nodes. Lymph node negativity is required in patients with iCCA being considered for liver transplantation under investigational protocols., Conclusion: Despite an upward trend in the LND rate, the reality is that only 10% of patients with iCCA receive an adequate LND. This review underscores the importance of routinely increasing the rate of adequate LND in these patients in order to achieve accurate staging, appropriately select patients for adjuvant therapy, and improve the prognosis of clinical outcomes. While prospective data is lacking, the therapeutic impact of LND remains unknown., (© 2023. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.)

Purpose: Most patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) develop recurrence after resection. Adjuvant capecitabine remains the standard of care for resected IHCC. A combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GAP) was associated with a 45% response rate and 20% conversion rate among patients with unresectable biliary tract cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of delivering GAP in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable, high-risk IHCC., Methods: A multi-institutional, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted for patients with resectable, high-risk IHCC, defined as tumor size > 5 cm, multiple tumors, presence of radiographic major vascular invasion, or lymph node involvement. Patients received preoperative GAP (gemcitabine 800 mg/m 2 , cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 , and nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) for a total of 4 cycles prior to an attempt at curative-intent surgical resection. The primary endpoint was completion of both preoperative chemotherapy and surgical resection. Secondary endpoints were adverse events, radiologic response, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Thirty evaluable patients were enrolled. Median age was 60.5 years. Median follow-up for all patients was 17 months. Ten patients (33%) experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events, the most common being neutropenia and diarrhea; 50% required ≥ 1 dose reduction. The disease control rate was 90% (progressive disease: 10%, partial response: 23%, stable disease: 67%). There was zero treatment-related mortality. Twenty-two patients (73%, 90% CI 57-86; p = 0.008) completed all chemotherapy and surgery. Two patients (9%) who successfully underwent resection had minor postoperative complications. Median length of hospital stay was 4 days. Median RFS was 7.1 months. Median OS for the entire cohort was 24 months and was not reached in patients who underwent surgical resection., Conclusion: Neoadjuvant treatment with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel is feasible and safe prior to resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and does not adversely impact perioperative outcomes., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Objective: To evaluate the association of perioperative ctDNA dynamics on outcomes after hepatectomy for CLM., Summary Background Data: Prognostication is imprecise for patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, and ctDNA is a promising biomarker. However, clinical implications of perioperative ctDNA dynamics are not well established., Methods: Patients underwent curative-intent hepatectomy after preoperative chemotherapy for CLM (2013-2017) with paired prehepatectomy/postoperative ctDNA analyses via plasma-only assay. Positivity was determined using a proprietary variant classifier. Primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Median follow-up was 55 months., Results: Forty-eight patients were included. ctDNA was detected before and after surgery (ctDNA+/+) in 14 (29%), before but not after surgery (ctDNA+/-) in 19 (40%), and not at all (ctDNA-/-) in 11 (23%). Adverse tissue somatic mutations were detected in TP53 (n = 26; 54%), RAS (n = 23; 48%), SMAD4 (n = 5; 10%), FBXW7 (n = 3; 6%), and BRAF (n = 2; 4%). ctDNA+/+ was associated with worse RFS (median: ctDNA+/+, 6.0 months; ctDNA+/-, not reached; ctDNA-/-, 33.0 months; P = 0.001). Compared to ctDNA+/+, ctDNA+/- was associated with improved RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.58)] and overall survival [HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.08-0.74)]. Adverse somatic mutations were not associated with survival. After adjustment for prehepatectomy chemotherapy, synchronous disease, and ≥2 CLM, ctDNA+/- and ctDNA-/- were independently associated with improved RFS compared to ctDNA+/+ (ctDNA+/-: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.53; ctDNA-/-: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.56)., Conclusions: Perioperative ctDNA dynamics are associated with survival, identify patients with high recurrence risk, and may be used to guide treatment decisions and surveillance after hepatectomy for patients with CLM., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We sought to characterize differences in pancreatectomy recommendation rates to surgically eligible patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head across age and racial groups., Background: Pancreatectomy is not recommended in almost half of otherwise healthy patients with stage I/II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma lacking a surgical contraindication. We characterized differences in pancreatectomy recommendation among surgically eligible patients across age and racial groups., Methods: Non-Hispanic White (NHW) and Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients were identified in the National Cancer Database with clinical stage I/II pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0 to 1, and age 40 to 89 years. Rates of surgery recommendation and overall survival (OS) by age and race were compared. A Pancreatectomy Recommendation Equivalence Point (PREP) was defined as the age at which the rate of not recommending surgery matched the rate of recommending and completing surgery. Marginal standardization was used to identify association of age and race with recommendation. OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models., Results: Among 40,866 patients, 36,133 (88%) were NHW and 4733 (12%) were NHB. For the entire cohort, PREP was 79 years. PREP was 5 years younger in NHB patients than in NHW patients (75 vs 80 years). Adjusted rates of not recommending surgery were significantly higher for NHB than for NHW patients in each age group. After adjusting for surgery recommendation, we found no difference in OS between NHW and NHB patients (hazard ratio 0.98 [95% CI 0.94-1.02])., Conclusions: PREP of NHB patients was 5 years younger than NHW patients, and in every age group, the rate of not recommending pancreatectomy was higher in NHB patients. Age and race disparities in treatment recommendations may contribute to shorter longevity of NHB patients., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). We hypothesized that post-hepatectomy ctDNA detection would identify patients at highest risk for early recurrence of CLM., Study Design: Patients with CLM who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy with ctDNA analysis within 180 days postoperatively (1/2013 and 6/2020) were included. Tissue somatic mutations and ctDNA analyses were performed by next-generation sequencing panels. Survival analyses determined factors associated with clinical recurrence 1 year or earlier after hepatectomy. Patients with primary tumors in situ and without 1-year follow-up were excluded. Median follow-up was 28.3 months., Results: Of 105 patients, 32 (30%) were ctDNA positive (ctDNA+) after curative-intent hepatectomy. Compared with ctDNA-negative patients, ctDNA+ patients had multiple CLM (84% vs 55%, p = 0.002) and co-mutated RAS/TP53 (47% vs 23%, p = 0.018). Multiple CLM (odds ration (OR), 5.43; p = 0.005) and co-mutated RAS/TP53 (OR, 3.30; p = 0.019) were independently associated with post-hepatectomy ctDNA. Although perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels were not prognostic, postoperative ctDNA+ (hazard ratio (HR), 2.04; p = 0.011) and extrahepatic disease (HR, 2.45, p = 0.004) were independently associated with worse recurrence-free survival. After adjusting for extrahepatic disease, preoperative chemotherapy, multiple CLM, tumor viability of 50% or greater, and co-mutated RAS/TP53, ctDNA+ within 180 days was the only independent risk factor for recurrence 1 year or earlier after hepatectomy (94% vs 49%; HR, 11.8; p = 0.003)., Conclusion: Postoperative ctDNA detection is associated with early recurrence 1 year or earlier after curative-intent hepatectomy for CLM, and RAS/TP53 co-mutations result in a more than 3-fold increased risk for postoperative ctDNA positivity. This highlights the complementary effect of tumor tissue and circulating mutational profiling for patients with CLM., (Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The past 20 years have seen advances in colorectal cancer management. We sought to determine whether survival in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has improved in association with three landmark advances: introduction of irinotecan- and/or oxaliplatin-containing regimens, molecular targeted therapy, and multigene alteration testing., Methods: Patients undergoing CLM resection during 1998-2014 were identified and grouped by resection year. The influence of alterations in RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 was evaluated and validated in an external cohort including patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer., Results: Of 1961 patients, 1599 met the inclusion criteria. Irinotecan- and/or oxaliplatin-containing regimens and molecular targeted therapy were used for more than 50% of patients starting in 2001 and starting in 2006, respectively, so patients were grouped as undergoing resection during 1998-2000, 2001-2005, or 2006-2014. Liver resectability indications expanded over time. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in 2006-2014, vs. 2001-2005 (56.5% vs. 44.1%, P < 0.001). RAS alteration was associated with worse 5-year OS than RAS wild-type (44.8% vs. 63.3%, P < 0.001). However, OS did not differ significantly between patients with RAS alteration and wild-type TP53 and SMAD4 and patients with RAS wild-type in our cohort (P = 0.899) or the external cohort (P = 0.932). Of 312 patients with genetic sequencing data, 178 (57.1%) had clinically actionable alterations., Conclusion: OS after CLM resection has improved with advances in medical therapy and surgical technique. Multigene alteration testing is useful for prognostication and identification of potential therapeutic targets., (© 2021. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.)

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma has high recurrence rates after surgery; however, there are no approved standard-of-care neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies. Immunotherapy has been shown to improve survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma; we therefore aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of perioperative immunotherapy in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma., Methods: In this single-centre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial, patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 240 mg of nivolumab intravenously every 2 weeks (for up to three doses before surgery at 6 weeks) followed in the adjuvant phase by 480 mg of nivolumab intravenously every 4 weeks for 2 years, or 240 mg of nivolumab intravenously every 2 weeks (for up to three doses before surgery) plus one dose of 1 mg/kg of ipilimumab intravenously concurrently with the first preoperative dose of nivolumab, followed in the adjuvant phase by 480 mg of nivolumab intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 2 years plus 1 mg/kg of ipilimumab intravenously every 6 weeks for up to four cycles. Patients were randomly assigned to the treatment groups by use of block randomisation with a random block size. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of nivolumab with or without ipilimumab. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with an overall response, time to progression, and progression-free survival. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03222076) and is completed., Findings: Between Oct 30, 2017, and Dec 3, 2019, 30 patients were enrolled and 27 were randomly assigned: 13 to nivolumab and 14 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Grade 3-4 adverse events were higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (six [43%] of 14 patients) than with nivolumab alone (three [23%] of 13). The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were increased alanine aminotransferase (three [23%] of 13 patients on nivolumab vs seven [50%] of 14 patients on nivolumab plus ipilimumab) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (three [23%] vs seven [50%]). No patients in either group had their surgery delayed due to grade 3 or worse adverse events. Seven of 27 patients had surgical cancellations, but none was due to treatment-related adverse events. Estimated median progression-free survival was 9·4 months (95% CI 1·47-not estimable [NE]) with nivolumab and 19·53 months (2·33-NE) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0·99, 95% CI 0·31-2·54); median time to progression was 9·4 months (95% CI 1·47-NE) in the nivolumab group and 19·53 months (2·33-NE) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group (HR 0·89, 95% CI 0·31-2·54). In an exploratory analysis, three (23%) of 13 patients had an overall response with nivolumab monotherapy, versus none with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Three (33%) of nine patients had a major pathological response (ie, ≥70% necrosis in the resected tumour area) with nivolumab monotherapy compared with three (27%) of 11 with nivolumab plus ipilimumab., Interpretation: Perioperative nivolumab alone and nivolumab plus ipilimumab appears to be safe and feasible in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Our findings support further studies of immunotherapy in the perioperative setting in hepatocellular carcinoma., Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb and the US National Institutes of Health., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AOK reports consulting, advisory roles or stock ownership, or both, for Gilead Sciences, Bayer Health, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Exelixis, and Merck; reports research funding to the MD Anderson Cancer Center from Adaptimmune, Bayer/Onyx, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Hengrui Pharmaceutical, Hengrui Pharmaceutical, and Merck; honoraria from Bayer Health, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, and Merck; and other expenses from Bayer/Onyx, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, and Merck. EH reports research funding to the MD Anderson Cancer Center from Conquer Cancer Foundation, Kidney Cancer Association, and International Kidney Cancer Coalation. KPSR reports research funding to the MD Anderson Cancer Center from Bayer, Daiichi, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Guardant, and Merck; and consulting fees from Bayer, Daiichi, AstraZeneca; and honoraria from Bayer, and Daiichi. RS reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. CWDT reports consulting fees donated to the MD Anderson Cancer Center from PanTher Therapeutics. RAW reports royalties or licenses from McGraw Hill for the MD Anderson Manual of Medical Oncology, 3rd edition; and travel support from Modern Medicine Emirates Oncology Society. JCY reports consulting fees from Hutchinson Medi Pharma, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Amgen, Chiasma Pharma, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Advanced Accelerator Applications International, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals; and leadership roles at the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. PS reports consulting fees from Achelois, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Affini-T, Apricity, BioAtla, BioNTech, Candel Therapeutics, Catalio, Codiak, Constellation, Dragonfly, Earli, Enable Medicine, Glympse, Hummingbird, ImaginAb, Infinity Pharma, Jounce, JSL Health, Lava Therapeutics, Lytix, Marker, Oncolytics, PBM Capital, Phenomic AI, Polaris Pharma, Sporos, Time Bioventures, Trained Therapeutix, Two Bear Capital, and Venn Biosciences; and ownership of stocks for Achelois, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Affini-T, Apricity, BioAtla, BioNTech, Candel Therapeutics, Catalio, Codiak, Constellation, Dragonfly, Earli, Enable Medicine, Glympse, Hummingbird, ImaginAb, Infinity Pharma, Jounce, JSL Health, Lava Therapeutics, Lytix, Marker, Oncolytics, PBM Capital, Phenomic AI, Polaris Pharma, Sporos, Time Bioventures, Trained Therapeutix, Two Bear Capital, and Venn Biosciences. JPA reports consulting fees from Achelois, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Apricity, BioAtla, BioNTech, Candel Therapeutics, Codiak, Dragonfly, Earli, Enable Medicine, Hummingbird, ImaginAb, Jounce, Lava Therapeutics, Lytix, Marker, PBM Capital, Phenomic AI, Polaris Pharma, Time Bioventures, Trained Therapeutix, Two Bear Capital, and Venn Biosciences; ownership of stocks for Achelois, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Apricity, BioAtla, BioNTech, Candel Therapeutics, Codiak, Dragonfly, Earli, Enable Medicine, Hummingbird, ImaginAb, Jounce, Lava Therapeutics, Lytix, Marker, PBM Capital, Phenomic AI, Polaris Pharma, Time Bioventures, Trained Therapeutix, Two Bear Capital, and Venn Biosciences. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data to guide surveillance following oncologic extended resection (OER) for gallbladder cancer (GBC) are lacking. Conditional recurrence-free survival (C-RFS) can inform surveillance. We aimed to estimate C-RFS and identify factors affecting conditional RFS after OER for GBC., Patients and Methods: Patients with ≥ T1b GBC who underwent curative-intent surgery in 2000-2018 at four countries were identified. Risk factors for recurrence and RFS were evaluated at initial resection in all patients and at 12 and 24 months after resection in patients remaining recurrence-free., Results: Of the 1071 patients who underwent OER, 484 met the inclusion criteria; 290 (60%) were recurrence-free at 12 months, and 199 (41%) were recurrence-free at 24 months. Median follow-up was 24.5 months for all patients and 47.21 months in survivors at analysis. Five-year RFS rates were 47% for the overall population, 71% for patients recurrence-free at 12 months, and 87% for the patients without recurrence at 24 months. In the entire cohort, the risk of recurrence peaked at 8 months. T3-T4 disease was independently associated with recurrence in all groups: entire cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-3.13, P < 0.001], 12-month recurrence-free (HR 3.42, 95% CI 1.88-6.23, P < 0.001), and 24-month recurrence-free (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.11-6.62, P = 0.029). Of the 125 patients without these risk factors, only 2 had recurrence after 36 months., Conclusion: C-RFS improves over time, and only T3-T4 disease remains a risk factor for recurrence at 24 months after OER for GBC. For all recurrence-free survivors after 36 months, the probability of recurrence is similar regardless of T category or disease stage.

Significance: The use of cancer-targeted contrast agents in fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) has the potential to improve intraoperative visualization of tumors and surgical margins. However, evaluation of their translational potential is challenging., Aim: We examined the utility of a somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (SSTR2)-targeted fluorescent agent in combination with a benchtop near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging system to visualize mouse xenografts under conditions that simulate the clinical FGS workflow for open surgical procedures., Approach: The dual-labeled somatostatin analog, Ga67-MMC(IR800)-TOC, was injected into mice (n  =  24) implanted with SSTR2-expressing tumors and imaged with the customized OnLume NIRF imaging system (Madison, Wisconsin). In vivo and ex vivo imaging were performed under ambient light. The optimal dose (0.2, 0.5, and 2 nmol) and imaging time point (3, 24, 48, and 72 h) were determined using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as the image quality parameter. Video captures of tumor resections were obtained to provide an FGS readout that is representative of clinical utility. Finally, a log-transformed linear regression model was fitted to assess congruence between fluorescence readouts and the underlying drug distribution., Results: The drug-device combination provided high in vivo and ex vivo contrast (CNRs  >  3, except lung at 3 h) at all time points with the optimal dose of 2 nmol. The optimal imaging time point was 24-h post-injection, where CNRs  >  6.5 were achieved in tissues of interest (i.e., pancreas, small intestine, stomach, and lung). Intraoperative FGS showed excellent utility for examination of the tumor cavity pre- and post-resection. The relationship between fluorescence readouts and gamma counts was linear and strongly correlated (n  =  334, R2  =  0.71; r  =  0.84; P  <  0.0001)., Conclusion: The innovative OnLume NIRF imaging system enhanced the evaluation of Ga67-MMC(IR800)-TOC in tumor models. These components comprise a promising drug-device combination for FGS in patients with SSTR2-expressing tumors.

Background: Early drain removal when postoperative day (POD) one drain fluid amylase (DFA) was ≤5000 U/L reduced complications in a previous randomized controlled trial. We hypothesized that most surgeons continue to remove drains late and this is associated with inferior outcomes., Methods: We assessed the practice of surgeons in a prospectively maintained pancreas surgery registry to determine the association between timing of drain removal with demographics, comorbidities, and complications. We selected patients with POD1 DFA ≤5000 U/L and excluded those without drains, and subjects without data on POD1 DFA or timing of drain removal. Early drain removal was defined as ≤ POD5., Results: Two hundred and forty four patients met inclusion criteria. Only 90 (37%) had drains removed early. Estimated blood loss was greater in the late removal group (190 mL versus 100 mL, P = 0.005) and pathological findings associated with soft gland texture were more frequent (97 [63%] versus 35 [39%], P < 0.0001). Patients in the late drain removal group had more complications (84 [55%] versus 30 [33%], P = 0.001) including pancreatic fistula (55 [36%] versus 4 [4%], P < 0.0001), delayed gastric emptying (27 [18%] versus 3 [3%], P = 0.002), and longer length of stay (7 d versus 5 d, P < 0.0001). In subset analysis for procedure type, complications and pancreatic fistula remained significant for both pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy., Conclusions: Despite level one data suggesting improved outcomes with early removal when POD1 DFA is ≤ 5000 U/L, experienced pancreas surgeons more frequently removed drains late. This practice was associated with known risk factors (estimated blood loss, soft pancreas) and may be associated with inferior outcomes suggesting potential for improvement., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Surgical margin status in cancer surgery represents an important oncologic parameter affecting overall prognosis. The risk of disease recurrence is minimized and survival often prolonged if margin-negative resection can be accomplished during cancer surgery. Unfortunately, negative margins are not always surgically achievable due to tumor invasion into adjacent tissues or involvement of critical vasculature. Herein, we present a novel intra-operative device created to facilitate a uniform and mild heating profile to cause hyperthermic destruction of vessel-encasing tumors while safeguarding the encased vessel. We use pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma as an in vitro and an in vivo cancer model for these studies as it is a representative model of a tumor that commonly involves major mesenteric vessels. In vitro data suggests that mild hyperthermia (41-46 °C for ten minutes) is an optimal thermal dose to induce high levels of cancer cell death, alter cancer cell's proteomic profiles and eliminate cancer stem cells while preserving non-malignant cells. In vivo and in silico data supports the well-known phenomena of a vascular heat sink effect that causes high temperature differentials through tissues undergoing hyperthermia, however temperatures can be predicted and used as a tool for the surgeon to adjust thermal doses delivered for various tumor margins.

Ambient ionization mass spectrometry has been widely applied to image lipids and metabolites in primary cancer tissues with the purpose of detecting and understanding metabolic changes associated with cancer development and progression. Here, we report the use of desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI-MS) to image metastatic breast and thyroid cancer in human lymph node tissues. Our results show clear alterations in lipid and metabolite distributions detected in the mass spectra profiles from 42 samples of metastatic thyroid tumors, metastatic breast tumors, and normal lymph node tissues. 2D DESI-MS ion images of selected molecular species allowed discrimination and visualization of specific histologic features within tissue sections, including regions of metastatic cancer, adjacent normal lymph node, and fibrosis or adipose tissues, which strongly correlated with pathologic findings. In thyroid cancer metastasis, increased relative abundances of ceramides and glycerophosphoinisitols were observed. In breast cancer metastasis, increased relative abundances of various fatty acids and specific glycerophospholipids were seen. Trends in the alterations in fatty acyl chain composition of lipid species were also observed through detailed mass spectra evaluation and chemical identification of molecular species. The results obtained demonstrate DESI-MSI as a potential clinical tool for the detection of breast and thyroid cancer metastasis in lymph nodes, although further validation is needed. Graphical Abstract Desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging is used to differentiate metastatic cancer from adjacent lymph node tissue.