Search

There is no doubt on the importance of randomisation in agricultural experiments by agronomists and biometricians. Even when agronomists extend the experimentation from small trials to large on-farm trials, randomised designs predominate over systematic designs. However, the situation may change depending on the objective of the on-farm experiments (OFE). If the goal of OFE is obtaining a smooth map showing the optimal level of a controllable input across a grid made by rows and columns covering the whole field, a systematic design should be preferred over a randomised design in terms of robustness and reliability. With the novel geographically weighted regression (GWR) for OFE and simulation studies, we conclude that, for large OFE strip trials, the difference between randomised designs and systematic designs are not significant if a linear model of treatments is fitted or if the spatial variation is not taken into account. But for a quadratic model, systematic designs are superior to randomised designs.

In the case of a linear state space model, we implement an MCMC sampler with two phases. In the learning phase, a self-tuning sampler is used to learn the parameter mean and covariance structure. In the estimation phase, the parameter mean and covariance structure informs the proposed mechanism and is also used in a delayed-acceptance algorithm. Information on the resulting state of the system is given by a Gaussian mixture. In on-line mode, the algorithm is adaptive and uses a sliding window approach to accelerate sampling speed and to maintain appropriate acceptance rates. We apply the algorithm to joined state and parameter estimation in the case of irregularly sampled GPS time series data., Comment: adaptive MCMC method application. need further work

Smoothing splines can be thought of as the posterior mean of a Gaussian process regression in a certain limit. By constructing a reproducing kernel Hilbert space with an appropriate inner product, the Bayesian form of the V-spline is derived when the penalty term is a fixed constant instead of a function. An extension to the usual generalized cross-validation formula is utilized to find the optimal V-spline parameters., Comment: a draft. not peer-reviewed yet

Trajectory reconstruction is the process of inferring the path of a moving object between successive observations. In this paper, we propose a smoothing spline -- which we name the V-spline -- that incorporates position and velocity information and a penalty term that controls acceleration. We introduce a particular adaptive V-spline designed to control the impact of irregularly sampled observations and noisy velocity measurements. A cross-validation scheme for estimating the V-spline parameters is given and we detail the performance of the V-spline on four particularly challenging test datasets. Finally, an application of the V-spline to vehicle trajectory reconstruction in two dimensions is given, in which the penalty term is allowed to further depend on known operational characteristics of the vehicle., Comment: 25 pages, submitted