Search

Purpose: To investigate the effect of technology-assisted Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) on post-operative clinical outcomes and tunnel placement compared to conventional arthroscopic ACLR., Methods: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched from January 2000 to November 17, 2022. Articles were included if there was intraoperative use of computer-assisted navigation, robotics, diagnostic imaging, computer simulations, or 3D printing (3DP). Two reviewers searched, screened, and evaluated the included studies for data quality. Data were abstracted using descriptive statistics and pooled using relative risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI), where appropriate., Results: Eleven studies were included with total 775 patients and majority male participants (70.7%). Ages ranged from 14 to 54 years (391 patients) and follow-up ranged from 12 to 60 months (775 patients). Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores increased in the technology-assisted surgery group (473 patients; P = 0.02; MD 1.97, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.66). There was no difference in objective IKDC scores (447 patients; RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.06), Lysholm scores (199 patients; MD 1.14, 95% CI - 1.03 to 3.30) or negative pivot-shift tests (278 patients; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.18) between the two groups. When using technology-assisted surgery, 6 (351 patients) of 8 (451 patients) studies reported more accurate femoral tunnel placement and 6 (321 patients) of 10 (561 patients) studies reported more accurate tibial tunnel placement in at least one measure. One study (209 patients) demonstrated a significant increase in cost associated with use of computer-assisted navigation (mean 1158€) versus conventional surgery (mean 704€). Of the two studies using 3DP templates, production costs ranging from $10 to $42 USD were cited. There was no difference in adverse events between the two groups., Conclusion: Clinical outcomes do not differ between technology-assisted surgery and conventional surgery. Computer-assisted navigation is more expensive and time consuming while 3DP is inexpensive and does not lead to greater operating times. ACLR tunnels can be more accurately located in radiologically ideal places by using technology, but anatomic placement is still undetermined because of variability and inaccuracy of the evaluation systems utilized., Level of Evidence: Level III., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).)

Background: A cross-sectional study of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients was conducted to determine the association of lower-extremity arterial calcification (LEAC) with acute perioperative cardiovascular events (CVEs)., Methods: Regression modeling was used to examine the association of radiographic presence of LEAC and acute myocardial infarction (MI), perioperative CVE, 30-day CVE readmit, and 30-day and 1-year mortality., Results: Of 900 TKA patients, LEAC was identified in 21.1%. Of LEAC cases, 1.6% had an acute MI vs 0.1% of non-LEAC cases (P = .031). Perioperative CVE rate was 5.8% for LEAC vs 1.5% for non-LEAC (P = .002). Having LEAC was identified as a significant risk factor for a perioperative CVE (odds ratio [OR] 2.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-7.35). Because of limited number of acute MI events, absence of 30-day CVE readmit, 30-day mortality, and few 1-year mortality events, computing OR for these was not possible. Likewise, because of small number of events (n = 3), estimates for the odds of LEAC cases having an acute MI are less reliable, yielding extremely large random errors (OR 11.37; 95% CI 0.09-597.93) and must be interpreted with caution. The OR for 1-year mortality was 1.88 (95% CI 0.17-13.20), but again with large random errors., Conclusion: Our study shows that LEAC around the knee is associated with an increased risk of having a perioperative CVE. Crude radiographic detection of LEAC around the knee has the potential to improve risk stratification for TKA patients by informing the surgeon of the need for further preoperative cardiac workup., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)