Search

The aim of this study was to evaluate the mental health consumption among patients with early-stage breast cancer in two radiation oncology departments in two countries (USA and Italy). Data were extracted from the medical records of consecutive patients treated between 2014 and 2015 in two centers. Extracted data included patient's demographics, treatment, referral to psychological supportive care programs, and prescribed psychotropic drugs. Data from the two centers were compared using Student's t, Wilcoxon, Fisher's exact, and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests. Adjusted relative risks (RR) were estimated using Poisson regression. A total of 231 (Italy = 110, USA = 121) patients were included, with a mean age of 60 years. The crude rate of psychological supportive care visits was similar in the US versus the Italian cohort (28.9 vs. 21.8%, p = 0.23). The crude rate of prescribed psychotropic drug was higher in the US cohort versus Italian cohort (43.8 vs. 18.2%, p < 0.0001). These differences remained significant after adjusting for breast cancer subtype, stage, and treatment (RR 1.8, 95 CI 1.17-2.76). Between 20 and 30% of patients receive psychological supportive care during treatment for breast cancer. The use of psychotropic medication was higher in the US cohort than the cohort from Italy. The reasons for these differences might be related to social and cultural differences and the method of prescribing medication.

Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatments cause severe toxicities, leading to high rates of emergency department (ED) visits and unplanned hospital admissions (UHAs). 
., Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate a quality improvement project to reduce ED visits and UHAs.
., Methods: A weekly nurse/nurse practitioner-led symptom management clinic was created for patients with HNC receiving radiation therapy deemed at high risk for an ED visit or UHA. Primary quality metrics were rate of visits or unplanned admissions. Time-to-event actuarial analysis and log-rank tests (two-tailed) were performed to compare observed to historic rates. 
., Findings: Rates of ED visits and UHAs were 11% and 16%, respectively. Having more symptom management visits marginally correlated with reduction in UHA. The authors estimate six ED visits and four UHAs were prevented, which is a $176,848 cost reduction.

Purpose: Unplanned hospital admissions in cancer patients undergoing treatment is an understudied area with important implications for both health care costs and patient outcomes. The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the rate, reasons for, and predictors of unplanned hospital admissions during or soon after palliative or curative radiation therapy for cancer, with or without chemotherapy., Methods and Materials: A total of 1116 consecutive patients who received external beam radiation therapy for a malignancy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill from January 1 through December 31, 2010, were studied. The primary outcome was unplanned hospitalization within 90 days of starting radiation therapy (ie, during or soon after). Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine patient and treatment factors associated with admissions., Results: Twenty percent of patients experienced an unplanned admission, which was especially likely in patients with lung (25% of such patients admitted), head and neck (22%), and gastrointestinal (21%) cancers, as well as those treated with palliative intent (31%). The most common causes for admission were gastrointestinal symptoms, neurologic symptoms, respiratory symptoms, pain, and fever or infection. Forty-seven percent of admitted patients were seen in the clinic within 2 weeks of unplanned hospital admission, and 61% of those patients had a related complaint in the clinic. Multivariate analysis showed that married patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.58; P < .001), curative intent (OR = 0.38; P < .001), and no concurrent chemotherapy (OR = 0.55; P < .001) were associated with decreased odds for admission., Conclusions: Unplanned admissions are relatively common during or soon after radiation therapy in our patient series. Additional work is needed to gather data from other centers and to better understand, and hopefully reduce, these unplanned admissions., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To present a clinical update regarding common distressing lung cancer symptoms and provide an update on management interventions., Data Sources: Journal articles, systematic reviews., Conclusion: Goals of treatment of the patient with lung cancer must include management of the high symptom burden that often accompanies the disease., Implications for Nursing Practice: Early assessment and management of symptoms improves quality of life. Nurses play a key role in implementing and monitoring these interventions., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer, and is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Notable carcinogens involved in the development of lung cancer include smoking, secondhand smoke, and radon. Lung cancer is divided into 2 major types: non-small-cell lung cancer, the most prevalent, and small-cell lung cancer. Treatment includes surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, or a combination of the same. Medical nutrition therapy is often required for nutrition-related side effects of cancer treatment, which include but are not limited to anorexia, nausea and vomiting, and esophagitis. The best protection against lung cancer is avoidance of airborne carcinogens and increased consumption of fruits and vegetables. Studies have shown that smokers taking large amounts of beta-carotene and vitamin A supplements had increased lung cancer incidence and mortality. However, ingestion of beta-carotene from foods, along with a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, has a protective role against lung disease. The use of complementary and alternative medicine by lung cancer patients is prevalent; therefore, clinicians should investigate whether complementary and alternative therapies are used by patients and advise them on the use of these therapies to avoid any potential side effects and interactions with conventional therapies. The article concludes with a case study of a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer and illustrates the use of medical nutrition therapy in relation to cancer treatment side effects.

Purpose: Orbital manifestations of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are rare and accounts for only 1% of all cases of NHL. There have been no reports of treating orbital lymphoma using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)., Materials and Methods: Four patients were treated at our institution for orbital lymphoma using IMRT. Radiotherapy (RT) plans using wedged pair fields were developed for comparison. Clinical results using IMRT are presented and a dosimetric analysis between IMRT and RT was performed., Results: All patients had a complete response based on their physical examinations and post-IMRT imaging. Symptoms that had been present at initial presentation resolved in all patients during the course of the treatment. All four patients experienced only grade 1 dry eye syndrome and keratitis. The average dose to the contralateral orbit, lacrimal gland, and lens were all significantly reduced (P < 0.01) in IMRT patients as compared to the RT patients. IMRT reduced the V5 and V10 for the contralateral lens, orbit, and lacrimal gland and the optic chiasm (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: IMRT is feasible when treating orbital lymphoma and reduces dose to critical structures while providing excellent dose coverage of target volumes. IMRT offers patients with orbital lymphoma excellent clinical outcomes, similar to conventional RT, with no increased toxicity.

Today's home care nurse faces many challenges in providing patient-centered care while working within the guidelines set forth by the payor. A patient with Type 1 diabetes who was blind and lived alone was referred to our agency. A multidisciplinary approach for diabetes education along with tools for the visually impaired led our patient to independent diabetes management while keeping within the managed care guidelines.