Search

Population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis was prospectively integrated in the clinical phase If programme of EO9 to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile in a larger population of patients, to estimate individual patient pharmacokinetic parameters, and to investigate relationships between drug exposure and clinical outcome. A sparse sampling method was developed, which involved three sampling times, and was implemented during course 1. A Bayesian algorithm was used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, In particular total plasma clearance (CL) of EO9 and area under the curve (AUC). In total, samples were collected of 85 (65%) of the patients. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was successful in 61 (72%) of the sampled patients. CL of EO9 showed substantial variability (median 5.08 l/min; range 2.67-6.42) and was of the same magnitude as in the phase I study where full pharmacokinetic profiles were used. No significant relationships were noticed between exposure parameters and safety, but overall limited toxicity was observed. No tumor responses were documented. Prospective implementation of large-scale population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis is feasible and may generate important findings, In particular when tumor responses and relevant toxicity are observed. [(C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.].

Purpose: To test the antitumor activity of Elsamitrucin in metastatic cancer of the breast, colon and rectum, non-small cell lung and ovary. Patients and methods: Eligibility required histologically proven cancer. Patients with colorectal or non-small cell lung cancer could not have received prior chemotherapy. Patients were entered if WHO PS was ≤2 and organ functions were normal. Treatment consisted of Elsamitrucin 25 mg/m2/week given as a 5-10 min infusion for at least 3-6 weekly doses. Results: One hundred and five patients entered the studies, 97 were eligible, 94 are evaluable for toxicity and 75 for response. Toxicity mainly consisted of mild nausea/vomiting, and less frequently reversible hepatotoxicity and malaise. No objective responses were seen. Conclusion: Elsamitrucin at this dose and schedule is not an active drug in metastatic breast cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer or ovarian cancer. © 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers. 5 4 375 376

PURPOSE: To test the antitumor activity of Elsamitrucin in metastatic cancer of the breast, colon and rectum, non-small cell lung and ovary. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility required histologically proven cancer. Patients with colorectal or non-small cell lung cancer could not have received prior chemotherapy. Patients were entered if WHO PS was < or = 2 and organ functions were normal. Treatment consisted of Elsamitrucin 25 mg/m2/week given as a 5-10 min infusion for at least 3-6 weekly doses. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients entered the studies, 97 were eligible, 94 are evaluable for toxicity and 75 for response. Toxicity mainly consisted of mild nausea/vomiting, and less frequently reversible hepatotoxicity and malaise. No objective responses were seen. CONCLUSION: Elsamitrucin at this dose and schedule is not an active drug in metastatic breast cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer or ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol

From May 1987 to May 1989 sixty one pre- and perimenopausal women with advanced or recurrent breast cancer entered in an open non comparative study. They were treated, as a first-line therapy, with goserelin (Zoladex ICI-118630) a long acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (LH-RH)-analogue in a depot formulation. Fifty three patients were evaluable for response; median age at entry was 41 years (range 28-56). Serum concentrations of 17 beta estradiol, LH and FSH were significantly suppressed within the first four weeks of therapy and remained suppressed for the whole duration of treatment. Subjective responses were observed, such as pain reduction and/or performance status improvement in 58% of patients. Overall objective response (CR + PR) occurred in 16 (30.2%) patients in all major sites of disease with a median time to response of 12 weeks (range 8 to 48 weeks) and a lifetable median duration of response of 36 weeks (range 16 to 76 weeks). The lifetable median time to progression was 17 weeks (range 5 to 76 weeks). Goserelin depot was well tolerated with no withdrawal due to possible adverse reactions. The observed subjective and objective response rates are comparable to those induced by surgical oophorectomy. Goserelin provides a well tolerated medical alternative to ovarian ablation, without the morbidity associated to surgery. In conclusion the present paper suggests that this innovative chemical estrogen deprivation, in premenopausal breast cancer patients, might be favorably investigated as an adjuvant therapy in future clinical trials.

From September 1988 two hundred-sixty-seven (267) untreated patients (pts) with stage II to IV high grade non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) have been enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, still ongoing study, comparing two third-generation combination chemotherapy regimens, MACOP-B versus F-MACHOP. At the present time, 177 pts have completed the treatment program and are evaluable, with a median follow-up of 13 months. Clinical, histologic and laboratory characteristics are equally distributed in both groups. Among the 92 pts treated with MACOP-B, 58 (63%) achieved a complete remission (CR), 17 complete responders have relapsed (29%), and 21 have died (23%), including 3 treatment-related deaths. Among the 85 pts who received F-MACHOP, 65 (76%) achieved a CR, 9 complete responders have relapsed (14%), and 11 pts have died (13%), including 3 treatment related deaths. 30 months-projected survival is 64% for MACOP-B treated pts compared to 84% for F-MACHOP treated pts; 30 months-projected relapse- free survival is 80% and 84%, respectively. F-MACHOP seems to be superior in immunoblastic lymphoma (overall survival, OS, 82% vs. 54%) and in Burkitt-type lymphoblastic lymphoma (OS 100% vs, 42%). The degree of hematological and non-hematological toxicity was similar in both regimens. More reliable conclusions will be drawn after a longer follow-up.

From February 1983 to January 1985, 497 patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive either epirubicin or doxorubicin in the following combination chemotherapy regimen: fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) on days 1 and 8; epirubicin or doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV on day 1; cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 IV on day 1 (FEC or FAC). Cycles were repeated every 21 days until progression or to cumulative doses of 700 mg/m2 for epirubicin and 550 mg/m2 for doxorubicin. Dose reductions were applied according to the standard criteria. Activity was evaluated in 443 patients (222 in the FEC arm and 221 in the FAC arm). The two experimental groups were comparable in age, performance status, menopausal status, histology, previous treatments, and site of the disease. The overall response rate (complete response and partial response [CR + PR]) was not significantly different: 53.6% for FEC and 56.5% for FAC. The median time to progression was 273 days for FEC and 314 days for FAC; the median survival time was 591 and 613 days, respectively. Leukopenia, anemia, nausea, and vomiting were significantly lower in patients treated with FEC. As for cardiotoxicity, four cases of congestive heart failure (CHF) were recorded among patients treated with FAC while only one was observed in the FEC group. These results indicate that epirubicin in a combination chemotherapy regimen is as active as doxorubicin and is significantly less toxic.

In a double-blind randomized trial, we compared the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose (2 mg/kg X 4) intravenous metoclopramide (MTC) versus metoclopramide plus high-dose (250 mg X 2) intravenous methylprednisolone (MP) administered for the first 2 days in untreated patients submitted to dacarbazine chemotherapy for 5 days. Thirty-four patients entered the study. Complete protection from nausea and vomiting was achieved in the majority of patients all through the study period with both antiemetic treatments, with slightly greater efficacy at day 2 for the combination. However, after suspension of the antiemetic therapy, there was a relapse of vomiting in patients. Side effects were not different between the two treatments, but extrapyramidal reactions were significantly increased on the second day of antiemetic therapy. In conclusion, high-dose MTC with or without MP can give good antiemetic protection and the combination seems to be slightly more efficacious. However, the relapse of vomiting after discontinuing antiemetic treatment and the high incidence of extrapyramidal reactions justify further studies to find a better antiemetic treatment.