Search

Purpose Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections are challenging to treat due to underlying patient conditions, pathogen characteristics, and high antibiotic resistance rates. As newer antibiotic therapies come to market, limited data exist about their real-world utilization. Methods This was a national retrospective cohort study of ceftazidime/avibactam (approved in 2015) utilization among inpatients from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, from 2015 through 2021. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate time trends in utilization. Results Ceftazidime/avibactam use increased by 52.3% each year (days of therapy per 1,000 bed days; 95% confidence interval, 12.4%-106.4%). We identified 1,048 unique predominantly male (98.3%) and white (66.2%; Black, 27.7%) patients treated with ceftazidime/avibactam, with a mean (SD) age of 71.5 (11.9) years. The most commonly isolated organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (36.3%; carbapenem resistant, 80.6%; MDR, 65.0%) and Klebsiella species (34.1%; carbapenem resistant, 78.4%; extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistant, 90.7%). Common comorbid conditions included hypertension (74.8%), nervous system disorders (60.2%), diabetes mellitus (48.7%), and cancer (45.1%). Median time to ceftazidime/avibactam initiation from admission was 6 days, with a median of 3 changes in therapy before ceftazidime/avibactam initiation and a subsequent median length of inpatient stay of 14 days (median of 8 days of ceftazidime/avibactam therapy). Treatment heterogeneity was high, both before ceftazidime/avibactam initiation (89.6%) and during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment (85.6%), and common concomitant antibiotics included vancomycin (41.4%), meropenem (24.1%), cefepime (15.2%), and piperacillin/tazobactam (15.2%). The inpatient mortality rate was 23.6%, and 20.8% of patients had a subsequent admission with ceftazidime/avibactam treatment. Conclusion Utilization of ceftazidime/avibactam increased from 2015 to 2021 in the national VA Healthcare System. Ceftazidime/avibactam was utilized in complex, difficult-to-treat patients, with substantial treatment heterogeneity and variation in the causative organism and culture sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pediatricians' offices are primary locations for pediatric influenza vaccination; however, pharmacists are also well-positioned as immunizers. Considering the current COVID-19 pandemic and Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, pharmacists' authority to vaccinate children has been recently expanded. Methods: We used the de-identified Optum ClinformaticsTM Data Mart database to identify demographic and clinical predictors of pharmacist-administered pediatric influenza vaccination compared with influenza vaccination in pediatricians' offices. Procedures codes for influenza vaccinations among children were captured for the 2016-2017 influenza season. Logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors. Results: We included 336 841 children receiving influenza vaccines by a pharmacist (5.2%) or in pediatricians' offices (94.8%). The following significant predictors were identified: older pediatric age groups (13-17 years odds ratio [OR] 91.51, 5-12 years OR 35.41), states allowing pharmacist-administered influenza vaccination at younger ages (no age restrictions OR, 26.68, minimum age 2-4 years old OR, 33.76), influenza vaccination outside of pediatricians' offices in the previous year (pharmacist-administered OR, 22.18, convenience care OR 4.15, emergency care OR 1.69), geographic region (South OR, 2.02, Midwest OR 1.60, and West OR 1.38), and routine health exam or follow-up in the prior 6-months (OR, 1.59). Conclusions: The strongest drivers of pharmacist-administered pediatric influenza vaccination were older pediatric age, more lenient minimum age restrictions, and previous influenza vaccination in a pharmacy. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the PREP Act, and forthcoming pediatric COVID-19 vaccines for children, pharmacists may play a greater role in pediatric vaccination resulting in sustained changes in pediatric vaccination practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]