[Objective] Evaluation indicators have functions such as goal orientation, assessment, monitoring and correction. However, the rural revitalization strategies implemented in different regions have unique features and priorities. Therefore, constructing a flexible evaluation indicator system that reflects regional characteristics is crucial for scientifically evaluating and identifying the development level and obstacles of rural revitalization in different types of regions. [Method] Based on the practical implementation of Chongqing' s rural revitalization strategy, a flexible evaluation approach was proposed. Empirical evaluation analysis was conducted using methods such as coefficient of variation, comprehensive evaluation and obstacle degree model. [Result] (i) The flexible evaluation indicator system for rural revitalization at the county scale in Chongqing consisted of ' 17 basic indicators + 6 characteristic indicators'. (ii) In general, the rural revitalization level of the three types of counties in Chongqing, including the pilot demonstration type, actively promoted type and key supported type, was not high by the end of the 13th Five-Year Plan period. The comprehensive evaluation values of the 20 sample counties ranged from 0. 22 to 0. 67, and there were significant differences among the three types of counties, with the key supported type having the lowest level of development. (iii) The development levels of the various dimensions of rural revitalization were uneven. The realization rates are 54% for affluent living, 47% for civilized rural customs, 47% for effective governance, 43% for ecological livability, 42% for thriving industries, and 40% for characteristic development. At the same time, there were significant differences in the development levels of each dimension among the three types of counties, especially in terms of thriving industries, ecological livability, affiuent living and characteristic development, with the maximum gap being 21 %, 23%, 46% and 20%, respectively. (iv) The rural revitalization level of the three types of counties was constrained by five obstacle factors, including the proportion of demonstration villages for garbage classification, the proportion of strong collective economy villages, the ratio of agricultural product processing output value to total agricultural output value, agricultural labor productivity, and the proportion of civilized villages at or above the county level. However, the degree of obstacle varied among different types of counties. Additionally, each type of county was also constrained by different indicators, such as the number of platforms for integrating industries, the proportion of agricultural products with ' Two products and one standard', and the ratio of disposable income of urban and rural residents. [Conclusion] The rural revitalization level of the three types of counties in Chongqing is not high, and the development levels of the various dimensions are uneven, and there is a significant gap between the three types of counties, and the rural revitalization level is mainly constrained by eight obstacle factors in six dimensions. In the next step, we need to intensify efforts to promote the development of various dimensions, continuously narrow the gap between the three types of counties, and promote the comprehensive revitalization of Chongqing's rural areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]