Search

Introduction: Procedural sedation (PS) is commonly performed in the emergency department (ED). Nil per os (nothing by mouth) (NPO) guidelines extrapolated from standards for patients undergoing elective procedures in the operating room have been applied to ED PS patients. There has been no large study of ED PS patients comparing differences in adverse events and PS success rates based on NPO status.Methods: From a cohort of consecutive ED PS patients of all ages in the 20 EDs of one hospital system—one quaternary ED, four tertiary EDs, six community hospital EDs, one rural ED, two pediatric EDs, and six freestanding EDs in two states in the Midwest and South—we conducted a retrospective analysis on a prospective database over 183 months from April 2000–June 2015. Primary outcome was the incidence of side effects and complications, which comprised the adverse effects. The side effects were nausea, vomiting, itching/rash, emergence reaction, myoclonus, paradoxical reaction, cough, and hiccups. Complications were oxygen desaturation

Objectives: Sedation is commonly utilized for individuals otherwise unable to receive dental treatment, such as those with disabilities, medically complex conditions, and dentophobics. The aim was to characterize the profiles of patients receiving various types of sedation and assess the corresponding success rates. Method and materials: This was a 5-year records-based retrospective study. Data regarding the indication for sedation, medical history, sedation type, and treatments performed were recorded. Results: In total, 103 patients underwent 389 treatment sessions under sedation; 42.7% of the patients were disabled. The most commonly administered sedation was moderate sedation, (49.4%), followed by deep (36.8%) and inhaled sedation (13.9%). Successful treatment results were achieved in 96.1% of sessions, with no adverse effects noted during recovery. The high success rates were independent of patient age, sex, and sedation type. There was a positive association between the indication for sedation and the type of sedation. The medically complex patients and the dentophobic patients received mainly moderate sedation (85.3% and 58.2%, respectively), whereas the disabled patients received deep sedation (51.2%). In total, 94% of patients were returning (revisiting) patients. A statistically significant association was found between the type of sedation administered and the success rate during the first and last sessions (P< .001). The success rate at the first session may be predictive of the success in subsequent sessions. Conclusion: A significant positive correlation was found between patient characteristics and the chosen sedation type leading to a high success rate across the various sedation modalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inguinal hernia repair is the most common operation in infants, with well recognized anesthetic and perioperative risks. The aim was to investigate if the combination of caudal block, high‐flow nasal oxygen insufflation and intravenous dexmedetomidine sedation is suitable for infants undergoing inguinal hernia surgery. Methods: A prospective multicenter international study was performed in three centers in Australia and New Zealand. Fifty infants less than 64 weeks post‐menstrual age undergoing inguinal hernia surgery were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were any condition that contraindicated the use of the anesthesia technique. The technique included intravenous dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 1–2 mcg/kg over 10 min and maintenance of 0.2–3 mcg/kg/h, high‐flow nasal oxygen insufflation 2 L/kg/min with an oxygen blender, and a caudal block using 1 mL/kg 0.2% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the successful completion of surgery without conversion to general anesthesia. Results: Completion of surgery with the technique was successful in 41/50 (82%) infants. Care was provided by 22 anesthesiologists and 11 surgeons. Infants had a low incidence of intraoperative complications, including apnea [1 (2.4%)], bradycardia [2 (4.9%)], hypotension [2 (4.9%)], and desaturation [1 (2.4%)]. Postoperative complications included apnea [3 (7.3%)], bradycardia [3 (7.3%)], hypotension [3 (7.3%)], desaturation [4 (9.8%)]. No infants were intubated in the first 24 h postoperatively. Conclusion: Caudal block, high‐flow nasal oxygen insufflation and intravenous dexmedetomidine sedation is a potential alternative to general anesthesia for infant inguinal hernia surgery with a low rate of complications in this small cohort of infants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiation therapy targets tumor tissue and requires children to lay still, often necessitating sedation. Historically anesthesiologists provided procedural sedation, but pediatric critical care physicians now regularly administer sedation outside the operating room. Procedural sedation for radiation poses unique challenges. The objective was to evaluate the success and assess complications of repeated sedations for radiation performed by pediatric critical care physicians. We performed a single-center, retrospective case series of children who received procedural sedation for radiation therapy by PICU physicians. The primary outcome was success, defined as completion of radiation treatment. Secondary outcomes included type of medication, dosing, tolerance, and complications requiring intervention. In our sample, 55 patients underwent 1174 sedation instances (mean 19.8 per patient). Patients had a mean age of 4.7 years (SD3.4), and weight of 20.2 kg (SD11.9). All patients had an ASA of 2 or 3. All patients had either a brain tumor or a non-mediastinal solid tumor. The success rate was 99.8%. The mean duration of sedation was 30.7 min (SD12.4). All sedations included propofol as a first agent with a mean bolus 3.3 mg/kg (SD1.4) and drip rate 148.7 mcg/kg/min (SD39.7). 4.4% of sedations required a second agent medication. There was no significant effect of repeated sedation with regards to the medication amount received (p = 0.97). Laryngospasm occurred during 0.2% of sedations. No patients required bag-mask ventilation, intubation, or chest compressions; no patients died during sedation. Pediatric critical care physicians can perform procedural sedation for radiation therapy successfully. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pediatric sedation clinics are rare in low-income countries. Our aim is to describe the establishment of the first-ever pediatric sedation clinic in Ethiopia and provide an assessment of its safety and efficacy over the 5 years since its establishment. Methods: A multi-phase approach was undertaken. In the first phase, we analyzed barriers to procedural pain management through repeated focus group discussions with stakeholders. Subsequently, we conducted a modified sedation provider course from the Society for Pediatric Sedation (SPS) with pre and post-training testing to document course effectiveness. Finally, we developed a procedural sedation clinic at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. In the second phase, we prospectively collected outcome data over a 5-year period from patients receiving procedural sedation at the clinic. This included assessing the efficacy of sedation and documenting any adverse events that occurred during the procedures. Result: One hundred three providers completed the procedural sedation course. There was a 13.4% improvement in knowledge between baseline and post-course testing. A total of 2,820 patients underwent procedural sedation over the 5-year period from 2016 through 2021, and data selected from 475 (16.8%) patients were analyzed. The most common procedure performed was bone marrow aspiration/biopsy in 384 subjects (80.8%). The most common procedural sedation used was the combination of ketamine and propofol in 60.6%. The mean pain score during the procedure was 0.28/10, which was significantly lower than the pre-procedural pain score (p-value < 0.001). A total of 9 (1.9%) patients had adverse events and there was no mortality. Conclusion: Based on our experience, development of a safe and effective sedation clinic is possible in resource-limited settings as evidenced by low procedural pain scores, and low adverse events rates. Provider training based on a modification of the SPS course improved overall procedural sedation knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients undergoing general anesthesia are more frequently monitored for depth of anesthesia using processed electroencephalography. Opioid-free anesthesia is nowadays an accepted modality for general anesthesia, however it is unclear how to interpret data from processed electroencephalography when using a mixture of non-opioid anesthetic drugs. Our objective was to describe density spectral array patterns and compare processed encephalographic data indices between opioid-free and routine opioid based anesthesia. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted on 30 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in a non-tertiary regional hospital. The patients underwent general anesthesia with three different methods and were monitored for anesthesia depth using processed encephalography and density spectral array. Primary outcome is a group-derived mean difference in patient state index and spectral edge frequency. As a secondary outcome a descriptive comparison of the spectral power, derived from the density spectral array, was done between groups. Results: The opioid-free anesthesia group had significantly higher patient state index and spectral edge frequency compared to routine anesthesia. Density spectral array patterns were also different, most notably lacking the high power in alpha frequency spectrum seen in the other routine anesthesia methods. Conclusions: Processed electroencephalography monitoring can be used in opioid-free anesthesia, however clinicians should expect higher values in monitoring indices. The density spectral array pattern using a common protocol for opioid-free anesthesia, with mainly sevoflurane combined with low doses of dexmedetomidine and esketamine, differs from well described opioid and GABA-ergic anesthesia methods. These findings should be further validated using other protocols for opioid-free anesthesia in order to safely monitor anesthesia depth. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT06227143, registration date; 26th of January 2024. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Awake craniotomy (AC) facilitates real-time brain mapping, maximizing tumor resection while preserving critical neurological functions. This study systematically reviews the efficacy of several anesthetic protocols under Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) during AC, focusing on clinical outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using data from observational studies and randomized trials involving AC under MAC. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The analysis employed mixed-effects models to assess both the overall rate of the outcomes and the impact of anesthetic agents on clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative neurological deficits. Of 468 studies initially identified, 26 met the inclusion criteria. The overall adverse event rate was 23.7%. The pooled proportion of patients with postoperative neurological deficits and intraoperative seizures was 10.45% and 8.8%, respectively. Remifentanil use was associated with a lower risk of neurological deficits in mixed effects meta-analysis (6.9% vs 16.5%), while intraoperative seizure rate was slightly lower with propofol use (7.1% vs. 11.8%). Midazolam use was also associated with lower agitation (5.5% vs. 10.9%). The rate of secondary adverse outcomes other than hypertension (10.2%) and tense brain (10%) were below 10% and comparable to the previous literature. The findings highlight the variability in anesthetic protocols used in MAC for AC. Despite limited evidence regarding safety concerns and potential confounders, Remifentanil, Propofol, and Midazolam appear to be superior to other agents evaluated in these procedures. However, further research is required to draw definitive conclusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The objective of this research was to compare two methods of conscious sedation (midazolam vs. sevoflurane) used for performing oral surgical procedures in the older adult population by analyzing dental treatment-related anxiety levels, the quality of sedation, and potential hemodynamic changes during the interventions, as well as post-recovery symptoms and patient satisfaction levels. Methods: A total of 104 patients underwent oral surgery with intravenous (age: 84.00 ± 8.410; 17 men and 36 women) and inhalation conscious sedation (age: 82.73 ± 8.809; 18 men and 33 women). Anxiety levels were recorded using the Modified Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS). During the intervention, the heart rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation, episodes of hypoxia (<90%SpO2), sedation duration, and Sedation–Agitation Scale (SAS) values were monitored. Upon completion of their treatment, all patients completed three questionnaires which evaluated their recall of the intervention, postoperative symptoms, and recommendation of the sedation method used. Results: Anxiety levels were slightly higher in the midazolam group (MDAS score: 9.60 ± 5.849; HARS score: 27.19 ± 6.802) compared to the sevoflurane group (MDAS score: 8.37 ± 5.063; HARS score: 24.92 ± 5.199), with no statistical significance (MDAS, p = 0.453/HARS, p = 0.065). No significant differences in the analyzed hemodynamic parameters were observed between the two groups. However, SAS values were significantly higher in the sevoflurane group (p = 0.006), while the sedation duration was longer in the midazolam group (p = 0.000). Postoperative symptoms, particularly gastrointestinal disturbances and dry mouth, were significantly more prevalent in the midazolam group, while there were no differences in neurological symptoms between the two groups. The majority of patients expressed a preference for either of these sedation methods. Conclusions: Sedation with agents such as midazolam and sevoflurane appears to be quite safe, given the absence of relevant hemodynamic changes. Midazolam has been shown to be effective for a longer duration, as well as to have a lower risk of developing greater digestive problems during the postoperative period. On the contrary, sevoflurane produced a greater sensation of dry mouth. Both sedative agents are perceived by the older adult population as satisfactory, recommending their use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the randomized SOLVE-TAVI (compariSon of secOnd-generation seLf-expandable vs. balloon-expandable Valves and gEneral vs. local anesthesia in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial comparing newer-generation self-expanding valves (SEV) and balloon-expandable valves (BEV), as well as conscious sedation (CS) and general anesthesia (GA), clinical outcomes were similar both for valve and anesthesia comparison at 30 days and 1 year. Prosthesis durability may affect clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up. Moreover, the impact of the anesthesia strategy on long-term clinical outcomes is unknown so far. The authors sought to compare clinical outcomes during 5-year follow-up in the randomized SOLVE-TAVI trial. In the randomized, multicenter, 2 × 2 factorial, open-label SOLVE-TAVI trial, 447 intermediate- to high-risk patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis were randomly assigned to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using either SEV (Evolut R, Medtronic) or BEV (SAPIEN 3, Edwards Lifesciences) and also to CS vs GA. Patients were followed-up for 5 years. During 5 years of follow-up, the combined predefined endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, moderate or severe paravalvular leakage, and permanent pacemaker implantation was similar in the SEV and BEV groups (67.7% vs 63.4%; HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.70-1.13; P = 0.34). Stroke rates at 5 years were lower in the SEV group (2.2% vs 9.6%; HR: 4.84; 95% CI: 1.65-14.18; P = 0.002). Regarding the anesthesia comparison, the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and acute kidney injury occurred in 51.4% in the CS group and 61.3% in the GA group (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.62-1.04; P = 0.09). All-cause mortality at 5 years was lower for CS (41.5% vs 54.3%; HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.53-0.94; P = 0.02). Transfemoral TAVR using either SEV and BEV as well as CS and GA showed similar clinical outcomes at 5 years using a combined clinical endpoint. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry has demonstrated utility in the assessment of esophageal motility as a complement to existing methodologies like high-resolution manometry. However, as FLIP is typically performed with sedation during routine endoscopy, there is potential for impact of sedation agents on esophageal motility. We aim to examine the effects of conscious sedation with midazolam and fentanyl on FLIP Panometry metrics and classification. Methods A cross-over study was conducted on 12 healthy, asymptomatic volunteers that completed FLIP while sedated with intravenous fentanyl and midazolam and while awake on a separate day. FLIP was performed in the same manner in both conditions with transoral placement of the FLIP and stepwise FLIP filling. During awake FLIP, subjects also rated the presence and intensity of esophageal perception. Results In both experimental conditions, all subjects demonstrated normal motility. The esophagogastric junction distensibility index was lower (median [interquartile range]: 5.8 [5.15-6.85] vs 8.9 [7.68-9.38] mm2/mmHg; P = 0.025), and the FLIP pressure was higher (46.5 [38.125-52.5] vs 33 [26-36.8] mmHg; P = 0.010) in the sedated condition compared to the awake condition. Maximum esophagogastric junction diameter and body distensibility plateau were no different between conditions (P = 0.999 and P = 0.098, respectively). Perception of esophageal sensation during awake FLIP was reported in 7/12 (58%) subjects. Conclusions While numeric differences in FLIP Panometry metrics were observed between sedated and awake FLIP in healthy subjects, these differences did not change the FLIP Panometry diagnosis. Sedated FLIP offers a well-tolerated method to assess esophageal motility during endoscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to determine the current U.S. practice patterns of analgesia (AG) and anesthesia (AS) for gynecologic brachytherapy (BT) procedures. A 27-item survey created with expertise from 5 brachytherapists was distributed electronically to 90 U.S. radiation oncology academic programs and publicized on social media and at 2 national meetings from June to October 2023. Forty-one responses were received (46%). Fifty-four percent identified as female, 66% as Caucasian, and 85% as non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Forty-nine percent use a BT suite ± computed tomography (CT) simulator alone, 39% the operating room ± BT suite or CT simulator or other location, 10% CT simulation room alone, and 2% clinic examination room. Thirty-four percent use general anesthesia alone (GA) for intracavitary BT (n = 41), 20% conscious sedation (CS) alone, 10% oral analgesia (OA) alone, 9% spinal or epidural AS alone, and 27% combination. Among those performing hybrid BT (n = 25), 40% use GA alone, 16% use CS alone, 12% epidural or spinal AS alone, 4% OA alone, and 28% combination. For template interstitial BT (n = 25), 44% use GA alone, 48% epidural alone or in combination with other AS, and 8% CS alone. Twenty-two percent of respondents provide AG or AS during applicator placement only, whereas 32% provide it during placement, planning, treatment, and removal. The most common reasons for not using CS or GA were the lack of AS resources and clinician preference. Seventy-three percent reported the belief that patients suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms after BT. However, 68% reported not using techniques to alleviate BT-related emotional distress. Many U.S. brachytherapists report using GA, CS, or epidural AS; however, 10% are using only OA, and 22% offer AG/AS only during applicator placement. Furthermore, a majority of respondents believe post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms can occur after BT, but few offer any intervention. AS resources and clinician preferences should be targeted for the expansion of higher-quality care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Postoperative opioid administration has been largely replaced by regional anesthesia techniques. We aimed to determine whether intraoperative Analgesia-Nociception Index (ANI) can aid in early evaluation of the effectiveness of regional blocks such as the pectoralis muscle fascia block (PECS, pectoserratus and interpectoral plane blocks) and predicting the need for analgesics postoperatively. This prospective observational study enrolled 30 women (age: 20–80 years) undergoing unilateral, non-intubated, breast tumor excision alone or in conjunction with sentinel lymph node biopsy. PECS block was performed following sedation. ANI readings were obtained at 1-min intervals, and polar coordinates were assigned to the distance from the nipple (0.5-cm intervals) and o'clock position (15-min intervals) for each reading. Pain scores were assessed using a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10, and analgesics were administered depending on pain score post-operatively. 8 (27%), 19 (63%), and 3 (10%) patients received morphine, tramadol, and no analgesics, respectively. In total, 954 ANI measurements were obtained. At the proposed cut-off of 50, the sensitivity and specificity of the ANI nadir for need of post-operative opioids were 0.875 and 0.932, respectively. Block effectiveness was most satisfactory in the upper lateral quadrant of the breast with nipple–areolar complex (NAC) sparing effect. Most average ANI measurements for the NAC were <50. No patient experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting, although one reported dizziness. The intraoperative ANI nadir <50 was strongly correlated with need for postoperative opioids. The ANI may aid in objectively evaluating the effectiveness of pectoralis muscle fascial blocks and predicting postoperative need for analgesics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ketamine provides the highest safety profile among sedatives for procedural sedation and analgesia in the pediatric emergency setting. However, it can cause vomiting and recovery agitation. No studies have examined epigenetic factors, such as microRNAs, for predicting the occurrence of these adverse events. Neuronal‐derived extracellular vesicle microRNA profiles were studied to predict the occurrence of ketamine‐induced vomiting and recovery agitation in children. For this aim, a single‐center prospective pharmacoepigenetic study was performed and 50 children who underwent procedural sedation with intravenous ketamine as the only sedative drug were enrolled between October 2019 and November 2022. MiRNA profiling in plasma neural‐derived extracellular vesicles was analyzed through next‐generation sequencing and measured before treatment with ketamine. Twenty‐two patients experienced vomiting or recovery agitation. Among the 16 differentially expressed microRNAs, the upregulated miR‐15a‐5p and miR‐484 targeted genes related to N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor activity, including glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2A (GRIN2A). Preliminary data confirmed lower GRIN2A levels in patients who developed these events. Downregulated miR‐126‐3p and miR‐24‐3p targeted AMPA receptor‐associated genes. Functional analyses of gene targets revealed the enrichment of glutamatergic and neurotrophins signaling. Recovery agitation was associated with this network. Vomiting was related to dopaminergic and cholinergic systems. Three miRNAs (miR‐18a‐3p, miR‐484, and miR‐548az‐5p) were identified as predictive biomarkers (AUC 0.814; 95% CI: 0.632–0.956) for ketamine‐induced vomiting and recovery agitation. MicroRNA profiles can predict the development of ketamine‐induced vomiting or recovery agitation in children. This study contributes to the understanding of the mechanisms underlying ketamine‐induced adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is essential in managing locally advanced cervical cancer. Brachytherapy as a modality has the advantage of a higher dose to the tumour with a dose fall off at the periphery as per the inverse square law. The dose per fraction is much higher than external beam radiotherapy. So proper application and dosimetry are of paramount importance to reduce late toxicity. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 69 patients who underwent three ICBT applications of 7 Gray in each fraction was done. The factors under consideration were the type of pain management (spinal anaesthesia (SA) versus conscious sedation (CS)), the initial size of the disease (bulky and non-bulky) and subsequent fractions (first fraction versus third fraction). The dosimetric parameters analysed were the doses received by points A, B and P and that of the critical organs (bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon). Results: The dose received by critical organs was comparable concerning all the factors under consideration. The dose to point P on the left side was significantly lower in the CS group than in the SA group (p -value = 0·031). Also, the dose to point P on the right side was significantly lower in the third fraction compared with the first fraction (p -value = 0·016). Conclusions: ICBT under spinal anaesthesia resulted in a higher dose to the pelvic wall. The initial size of the tumour or the subsequent fractions does not significantly affect the dose received by critical organs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is currently insufficient evidence on potential predictors of a child's behaviour with nitrous oxide (N2O) sedation. Aim: To examine the association between a child's temperament and behavioural outcomes during dental treatment with N2O sedation, and the child's perception to N2O sedation. Design: At the first visit (dental treatment visit), temperament was assessed using the Child Behaviour Questionnaire—Short Form and behaviour was assessed by an independent rater using the Venham Behaviour Rating Scale. At the second visit, the child's experience with N2O sedation was elicited. Results: Seventy‐two healthy children aged between 36 and 95 months were recruited. Planned dental treatment was completed in 84.7% of the subjects. Venham behaviour success <3 and Venham behaviour success <1 were achieved in 73.6% and 33.3%, respectively. The temperament domain of effortful control was associated with Venham behaviour score (ρ = −0.266, p =.024) and Venham behaviour success <1 (OR = 3.506, 95% CI = 1.328–9.259, p =.011). Baseline Frankl behaviour score was significantly associated with all behavioural outcomes. Venham behaviour success <3 was significantly associated with a child reporting to have enjoyed the dental treatment visit (p =.026). Conclusion: Effortful control and baseline behaviour were associated with behavioural outcomes of N2O sedation and can be used to predict a child's behaviour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Current guidelines recommend 6 h of solid food and 2 h of clear liquid fasting for patients undergoing cardiac procedures with conscious sedation. There are no data to support this practice, and previous single-centre studies support the safety of removing fasting requirements. The objective of this study was to determine the non-inferiority of a no-fasting strategy to fasting prior to cardiac catheterization procedures which require conscious sedation. Methods This is a multicentre, investigator-initiated, non-inferiority, randomized trial conducted in Australia with a prospective open-label, blinded endpoint design. Patients referred for coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, or cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related procedures were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to fasting as normal (6 h solid food and 2 h clear liquid) or no-fasting requirements (encouraged to have regular meals but not mandated to do so). Recruitment occurred from 2022 to 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of aspiration pneumonia, hypotension, hyperglycaemia, and hypoglycaemia assessed with a Bayesian approach. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction score, new ventilation requirement (non-invasive and invasive), new intensive care unit admission, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, 30-day pneumonia. Results A total of 716 patients were randomized with 358 in each group. Those in the fasting arm had significantly longer solid food fasting (13.2 vs. 3.0 h, Bayes factor >100, indicating extreme evidence of difference) and clear liquid fasting times (7.0 vs. 2.4 h, Bayes factor >100). The primary composite outcome occurred in 19.1% of patients in the fasting arm and 12.0% of patients in the no-fasting arm. The estimate of the mean posterior difference in proportions with credibility interval (CI) in the primary composite outcome was −5.2% (95% CI −9.6 to −.9), favouring no fasting. This result confirms the non-inferiority (posterior probability >99.5%) and superiority (posterior probability 99.1%) of no fasting for the primary composite outcome. The no-fasting arm had improved patient satisfaction scores with a posterior mean difference of 4.02 points (95% CI 3.36–4.67, Bayes factor >100). Secondary outcome events were observed to be similar. Conclusions In patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and CIED-related procedures, no fasting was non-inferior and superior to fasting for the primary composite outcome of aspiration pneumonia, hypotension, hyperglycaemia, and hypoglycaemia. Patient satisfaction scores were significantly better with no fasting. This supports removing fasting requirements for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization laboratory procedures that require conscious sedation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the precision and safety of a novel technique of free-hand frameless pinless AXIEMTM-based navigation guided biopsy of deep-seated brain lesions in a low-middle income country. Methods: This retrospective study included 45 patients who underwent free-hand frameless pinless AXIEMTM-based navigation guided biopsy of deep-seated brain lesions using the Medtronic-Stealth S7 system over a 5-year period (January 2019 to December 2023) at the Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan. Results: A total of 45 patients were included in this study. There were 4 (8.9%) patients in the 1 to 20 years age group, 10 (22.2%) in 21 to 40 years, 24 (53.3%) in 41 to 60 years and 7 (15.6%) were above 60 years. Mean age (years) was 47.29 ± 17.192 SD. Mean time (minutes) for procedures was 37.87 ± 9.6 SD. There were 28 (62.2%) male and 17 (37.8%) female patients. Among patients reviewed in this study 2 (4.4%) had lesions in Corpus Callosum, 8 (17.8%) in Lobar region, 5 (11.1%) were Multiple/Metastatic and 30 (66.7%) were in Thalamus/Internal Capsule/Basal Ganglia. Size of lesions was less than 1 cm in 4 (8.9%) cases, 1-2 cm in 29 (64.4%) and 2 to 3 cm in 12 (26.7%) cases. There were 18 (40%) patients with lesions on the left side, 21 (46.7%) on the right side, 4 (8.9%) bilateral and 2 (4.4%) in the midline. Most cases were performed in local (40%) or local with IV sedation (48.9%) and a few in general anesthesia (11.1%). Biopsy results were successfully diagnostic in 40 (88.9%) and non-diagnostic in 5 (11.1%) patients. Glioblastoma WHO Grade IV was seen in 20 (44.4%) patients, Diffuse Astrocytoma WHO Grade II in 5 (11.1%), Anaplastic Astrocytoma WHO Grade III in 2 (4.4%), Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma in 1 (2.2%), Lymphoma in 7 (15.6%) and Metastasis in 5 (11.1%) patients. Asymptomatic minor haemorrhage was seen in 3 (6.7%) patients, massive haemorrhage in 2 (4.4%), hydrocephalus in 1 (2.2%), surgical site infection in 1 (2.2%) and 38 (84.4%) patients had no complications. Conclusions: AXIEMTM-based Medtronic-Stealth S7 is a quick, reliable, real-time and secure neuronavigation system for taking a free-hand, frameless and pinless biopsy of deep-seated lesions in the brain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to examine the application of hypnosis in ophthalmology. Methods and Materials: In this case report, the author describes the application of clinical hypnosis as the sole sedation and analgesic method for eyelid repair in a traumatic patient. The patient, a 30-year-old Persian male, was admitted to the emergency ward of Kashani Hospital in Isfahan, Iran, with a chief complaint of a left upper eyelid injury resulting from a motorbike accident. Since the patient refused any local anesthesia or sedation (due to his concern related to a previous history of allergic reactions to lidocaine), suturing under hypnosis sedation was proposed. A 15-minute hypnosis session was conducted, incorporating sedation and analgesic suggestions. The laceration was repaired, and the patient's hypnotic state was terminated to natural awareness. The patient reported no pain associated with the sutures and expressed a sense of absolute freshness upon completion of the procedure. Furthermore, his visual analogue scale scores for pain and anxiety decreased compared to the admission time. Findings: This report demonstrates a validated approach for minor reconstructive surgeries (e.g. eyelid repair), particularly when concerns arise regarding sedative drug allergies or side effects. Moreover, it highlights the potential applications of hypnosis in other ophthalmic surgeries, psychosomatic-related complaints, and medication adherence. Conclusion: The author suggests further exploration and expansion of hypnosis in the field of ophthalmology (hypno-ophthalmology). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key recommendations: All gynaecology departments should provide a dedicated outpatient hysteroscopy service to aid care of women and people with abnormal uterine bleeding, reproductive problems, and insertion/retrieval of intrauterine devices. [Grade A]Written information should be provided to the woman prior to their appointment. This should include details about the procedure, the benefits and risks, advice regarding pre‐operative analgesia, as well as alternative options for care and contact details for the hysteroscopy unit. [Good Practice Point]Women should be made aware of other settings and modes of anaesthesia for hysteroscopy (e.g. under general or regional anaesthesia or intravenous sedation). [GPP]The woman should be advised that if they find the procedure too painful or distressing at any point, they must alert the clinical team who will stop the procedure immediately. The clinical team should alert the hysteroscopist if the woman appears to be in too much pain or is experiencing a vasovagal episode and therefore unable to voice the concerns so that the procedure can be stopped. [GPP]Women should be advised to take standard doses of oral non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) one hour before their scheduled appointment.Vaginoscopy should be the standard technique for outpatient hysteroscopy unless the use of a vaginal speculum is required (e.g. for administering local cervical anaesthesia or dilating the cervix). [Grade A]When performing operative hysteroscopy, the smallest diameter hysteroscope should be used, with consideration given to the use of hysteroscopes with expandable outer working channels because they are associated with less pain. [Grade B]Mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal systems should be preferred over miniature bipolar electrodes to remove endometrial polyps. [Grade A]Local anaesthesia should not be routinely administered prior to outpatient hysteroscopy where a vaginoscopic approach is used. It should be considered where use of a vaginal speculum is planned e.g. for cervical dilatation if anticipated, due to either cervical stenosis and/or the utilisation of larger‐diameter hysteroscopes (≥5mm outer diameter). [Grade A]Saline should be instilled at the lowest possible pressure to achieve a satisfactory view. [Grade A]Conscious sedation should not be routinely used in outpatient hysteroscopic procedures. [Grade B] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preventing intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV) is crucial for maternal safety during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. While midazolam is known to prevent IONV, we hypothesized that remimazolam would be superior due to its minimal hemodynamic effects. We compared the effects of the two drugs on IONV. Methods: Parturients scheduled for cesarean section were randomly assigned to receive either midazolam or remimazolam. They received midazolam 2 mg or remimazolam 5 mg, with additional doses administered upon request. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of newly developed IONV during sedation. Other outcomes included overall IONV, rescue antiemetic use, shivering, hemodynamic variables, sedation scale scores, and satisfaction scores. Results: Data from 80 participants were analyzed. Deeper sedation was induced in the remimazolam group (PGroup × Time < 0.001) despite comparable hemodynamic trends between the groups. The incidence of overall IONV was comparable between the two groups (27.5% in the midazolam group vs. 17.5% in the remimazolam group, absolute risk reduction [ARR]: 0.100, 95% CI [-0.082, 0.282], P = 0.284); however, newly developed IONV during sedation was significantly reduced in the remimazolam group (20.0% vs. 5.0%, ARR: 0.150, 95% CI [0.009, 0.291], P = 0.043). The need for rescue antiemetics was also lower in the remimazolam group (15.0% vs. 2.5%, ARR: 0.125, 95% CI [0.004, 0.246], P = 0.048). Conclusion: Remimazolam significantly reduced the incidence and severity of newly developed IONV compared with midazolam, with minimal impact on hemodynamics, making it a useful sedative option for cesarean section. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting emergent conversion to general anaesthesia (GA) in stroke patients during thrombectomy. In this retrospective study, 458 patients (320 and 138 were randomised into the training and validation cohorts) were enroled. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to identify risk factors for emergent conversion to GA. Subsequently, a nomogram was constructed based on the identified risk factors. The discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility of the nomogram were assessed in both the training and validation cohorts using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The emergent conversion to GA occurred in 56 cases (12.2%). In the training cohort, four independent predictors of emergent conversion to GA were identified and incorporated into the nomogram: core infarct volume > 70 mL, severe aphasia, severe cerebral vessel tortuosity, and vertebrobasilar occlusion. The ROC curves illustrated area under curve values of 0.931 (95% CI: 0.863–0.998) and 0.893 (95% CI: 0.852–0.935) for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Hosmer–Lemeshow testing resulted in average absolute errors of 0.028 and 0.031 for the two cohorts. DCA demonstrated the nomogram's exceptional utility and accuracy across a majority of threshold probabilities. The constructed nomogram displayed promising predictive accuracy for emergent conversion to GA in stroke patients during thrombectomy, thereby providing potential assistance for clinical decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on comparing the efficacy of pregabalin and midazolam as premedication in children undergoing general anesthesia for dental procedures. Topics include the assessment of anxiety reduction and sedation effects, the evaluation of hemodynamic parameters and recovery outcomes, and the statistical comparison of sedation levels between the two drugs.

Background and Aims: Remifentanil and fentanyl are potent opioid analgesics commonly used during surgery due to their distinct pharmacological profiles. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a generic remifentanil (test drug) with fentanyl and Ultiva (innovator formulation) during general anaesthesia in the Indian population. Methods: This phase III, multi-centre (n = 13), randomised, three-arm, comparative study was conducted from 24 November 2021 to 31 March 2022. Eligible subjects scheduled for elective therapeutic and diagnostic surgical procedures (n = 314) were randomised into generic remifentanil, Ultiva, and fentanyl groups. An independent anaesthetist blinded to treatment allocation assessed efficacy and safety parameters. The primary efficacy endpoint was haemodynamic response during specific activities (endotracheal intubation, skin incision, skin closure, and extubation). Results: The study groups exhibited no significant differences in demographic and baseline characteristics. Heart rate was similar between the remifentanil and Ultiva groups measured during laryngeal intubation, skin incision, skin closure, and extubation (P > 0.05 in all four procedures). Heart rate was significantly higher in the fentanyl group in comparison to the remifentanil group during laryngeal intubation (P = 0.035), skin incision (P = 0.017), skin closure (P = 0.001), and extubation (P = 0.026). The need for vasopressor and anti-cholinergic drugs was similar between groups, and no subject required naloxone administration. Conclusion: Our study’s findings demonstrated that generic remifentanil is non-inferior to fentanyl and equivalent to Ultiva for general anaesthesia in Indian patients undergoing various surgical and diagnostic procedures. Remifentanil offers advantages in terms of optimum haemodynamic stability, fast equilibrating analgesia, and rapid emergence from sedation, making it a suitable alternative to fentanyl.

Abstract Objectives To explore whether monitored anesthesia care is more beneficial to the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods The research methodology involved comprehensive searches across major databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering the period from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2024. The aim was to identify trials comparing different anesthetic methods for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The primary outcomes assessed were mortality and length of hospital stay, while secondary outcomes included common complications such as bleeding, stroke, paravalvular leakage, renal failure, and others. Data synthesis was conducted using risk ratios or standardized mean differences, along with 95% confidence intervals. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024507749). Results A total of 35 trials and 45,616 patients were included in this study. The results showed that monitored anesthesia care significantly reduced the patient's risk of death, shortened the patient's length of hospital stay, and also reduced the risk of common complications such as paravalvular leakage (RR, 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.88; p

Background The ideal anesthetic drug choice for local infiltration anesthesia under monitored anesthesia care must provide analgesia and patients' comfort along with a bloodless surgical field for patients. We hypothesized that dexemedetomidine can provide better visibility of the surgical field at a higher dose of 1 µg/kg than 0.5 µg/kg, along with providing sedation and analgesia. Methods After institutional ethics committee clearance and written informed consent, this prospective, randomized, triple blind study was conducted on ninety patients, between 18-65 years who were scheduled for tympanoplasty. The patients were randomly assigned to either the dexmedetomidine (DEX) 0.5 group or the DEX 1.0 group, and received 10 ml solution containing 2% lignocaine with 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, or the 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine. The operative surgeon performed local infiltration using standardized 5-point infiltration technique around the auricle. The primary objective was to compare the intraoperative bleeding at the surgical site. The comparison of normally distributed variables was conducted using the Student's t-test, whereas non-normally distributed variables was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The analysis of qualitative data was conducted using the chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The overall bleeding score was significantly higher in the DEX 0.5 group (3.21 ± 0.727) than the DEX 1.0 group (1.43 ± 0.661) (P value < 0.001). The time to first analgesic requirement and surgeon satisfaction score were also significantly higher in the DEX 1.0 group. Conclusions Combining dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 µg/kg with 2% lignocaine for infiltration provided improved analgesia and improved the surgical field during tympanoplasty performed under monitored anesthesia care.

Background This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for chloral hydrate sedation failure and complications in a tertiary children’s hospital in South Korea. Methods A retrospective analysis of pediatric procedural sedation with chloral hydrate between January 1, 2021, and March 30, 2022, was performed. The collected data included patient characteristics, sedation history, and procedure. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for procedural sedation failure and complications. Results A total of 6,691 procedural sedation were included in the analysis; sedation failure following chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg) occurred in 1,457 patients (21.8%) and was associated with a higher rate of overall complications compared to those with successful sedation (17.5% [225/1457] vs. 6.2% [322/5234]; P < 0.001, odds ratio: 3.236). In the multivariable regression analysis, the following factors were associated with increased risk of sedation failure: general ward or intensive care unit inpatient (compared with outpatient); congenital syndrome; oxygen dependency; history of sedation failure or complications with chloral hydrate; procedure more than 60 min; and magnetic resonance imaging, radiotherapy, or procedures with painful or intense stimuli (all P values < 0.05). Factors contributing to the complications included general ward inpatient, congenital syndromes, congenital heart disease, preterm birth, oxygen dependency, history of complications with chloral hydrate, and current sedation failure with chloral hydrate (all P values < 0.05). Conclusions To achieve successful sedation with chloral hydrate, the patient’s sedation history, risk factors, and the type and duration of the procedure should be considered.

Background Minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) emphasizes early recovery. Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine with a short recovery time. This study hypothesized that remimazolam is non-inferior to dexmedetomidine in terms of recovery after TAVR. Methods In this retrospective observational study, remimazolam was compared to dexmedetomidine in patients who underwent TAVR under MAC at a tertiary academic hospital between July 2020 and July 2022. The primary outcome was timely recovery after TAVR, defined as discharge from the intensive care unit within the first day following the procedure. Propensity score matching was used to compare timely recovery between remimazolam and dexmedetomidine, applying a non-inferiority margin of −10%. Results The study included 464 patients, of whom 218 received remimazolam and 246 received dexmedetomidine. After propensity score matching, 164 patients in each group were included in the analysis. Regarding timely recovery after TAVR, remimazolam was non-inferior to dexmedetomidine (152 of 164 [92.7%] in the remimazolam group versus 153 of 164 [93.3%] in the dexmedetomidine group, risk difference [95% CI]: −0.6% [−6.7%, 5.5%]). The use of remimazolam was associated with fewer postoperative vasopressors/inotropes (21 of 164 [12.8%] vs. 39 of 164 [23.8%]) and temporary pacemakers (TPMs) (76 of 164 [46.3%] vs. 108 of 164 [65.9%]) compared to dexmedetomidine. Conclusions In patients undergoing TAVR under MAC, remimazolam was non-inferior to dexmedetomidine in terms of timely recovery. Remimazolam may be associated with better postoperative recovery profiles, including a lesser need for vasopressors/inotropes and TPMs.

Abstract Background We explored the efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation in painless colonoscopy. Methods A total of 195 patients who underwent painless colonoscopy surgery were randomly divided into three groups: the propofol deep sedation group (group DS), the sufentanil combined with propofol for conscious sedation (group CS1) and the esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation (group CS2). The primary outcomes of this study included the incidence of hypoxemia, hypotension, hypertension, and bradycardia and excellent and good rates of anaesthesia during colonoscopy. The secondary outcomes included perioperative changes in vital signs (MAP, HR, and SpO2), anaesthesia induction time, dischargeable time, patient and endoscopist satisfaction scores, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), drowsiness, dizziness, propofol injection pain, assisted ventilation and vasoactive medications. Results The incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia in the DS group was significantly greater than that in the CS1 and CS2 groups (χ2 = 7.081, P = 0.029). The incidence of hypotension in the CS2 group was significantly lower than that in the DS and CS1 groups (χ2 = 16.278, P

Background and Aim: Patient movement during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most frequent cause of artifacts and poor scan quality. Children cannot lie still. Thus, anesthesia is required to keep the child calm and immobile. This randomized double-blinded clinical trial compares the clinical effects of the addition of dexmedetomidine as premedication with ketofol on the quality of sedation. We hypothesized that the addition of dexmedetomidine would improve the quality of sedation. Methods: A total of 132 children aged 6 months to 10 years were randomized into groups DK (dexmedetomidine–ketofol) and K (ketofol). DK received an intravenous bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) as premedication 10 minutes prior. Both the groups were induced with ketofol (0.5 mg/kg), and sedation was maintained with propfol infusion (100 mcg/kg/min). The primary objective was the quality of sedation as assessed by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale. Image quality, requirement of rescue propofol dose, recovery, and adverse events were also studied. Data are given as median [interquartile range (IQR)] or frequency. Results: All 132 children completed MRI scans. The DK group showed significantly better quality of sedation, 71% versus 47% of children, a median difference of 1 (-0.569 to -0.0969), P < .005, a better quality of scan, a reduced number of additional doses of propofol, and a decreased total dose of propofol. Hemodynamic parameters and recovery times for the two groups were similar. There were no significant side effects in both groups. Conclusion: The quality of sedation and the quality of the MRI scan are greatly improved by administering dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) 10 minutes before to induction. Additionally, this technique decreases the need of propofol and gives better hemodynamic stability without delaying the recovery time.

Abstract Most newly diagnosed pediatric cancer patients reside in LMICs. These countries face challenges in providing quality treatment, particularly with procedures requiring stillness or causing pain. Conscious sedation (CS) is underutilized in LMICs due, causing treatment delays and adverse outcomes. Advocacy for CS teams, training, and policy support is essential to improve outcomes.

Introduction: The success of any dental treatment fundamentally predicated on completing procedures with minimal discomfort and optimal patient cooperation. However, achieving this goal becomes particularly challenging in paediatric patients, whose behaviour is often influenced by a myriad of factors, including fear, anxiety and the unfamiliarity of the dental environment. While non pharmacological behaviour guidance techniques play a pivotal role in managing such challenges, there are instances where they prove insufficient, necessitating the utilisation of pharmacological behaviour management strategies such as Conscious Sedation (CS). Aim: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of Nitrous Oxide Inhalation Sedation (NOIS) utilising two distinctive gas dissemination systems, the Matrx Porter and the Consed machines, in paediatric patients undergoing pulp therapy. The focus is on assessing patient behaviour, pain perception, and sedation outcomes. Materials and Methods: This non-randomised, split-mouth, crossover clinical trial conducted in the Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry at Saveetha Dental College and Hospital in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India from June 2022 to August 2022 employed 80 healthy but anxious children, aged 4 to 8 years, who required multiple treatments involving local anaesthetic administration across two consecutive appointments. Informed consent was acquired from their parents to perform a procedure under NOIS. The participants were sedated using the Consed machine (Group-A) during the first visit and the Matrx machine (Group-B) during the subsequent visit. Differences in pain were measured using the Modified Wong Baker’s pain rating scale, and sedation was assessed using the Ramsay sedation scale during local anaesthetic administration, behaviour using Frankl’s behaviour rating scale was assessed before the start of treatment and during local anaesthetic administration. Statistical analysis, performed with the Mann-Whitney test, evaluated pain, behaviour, and sedation levels in children undergoing dental treatment with two distinct gas distribution systems. Results: The mean age of the children included in the present study was 7.3±1.212 years. The study found significant differences in behaviour scores between the two groups at two time points: during local anaesthetic administration (p=0.039) and after completion of treatment (p=0.048). Specifically, during local anaesthetic administration, Group-B showed a higher proportion of children exhibiting improved behaviour compared to Group-A. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in pain scores during local anaesthetic administration (p=0.089) or sedation scores (p=0.074) between the Consed (Group-A) and Matrx (Group-B) machines. Conclusion: There were no observed alterations in the sedation levels of children who underwent NOIS, regardless of whether it was administered by the Consed or Matrx machine.

Background and Aim: Management of pain and anxiety associated with dental procedures in pediatric age group is a big challenge. In this part of the world, counselling has been the main modality for managing such patients. It is associated with mixed outcome. We share our experience of managing 23 patients using a combination of inhalational nitrous oxide- oxygen and intravenous midazolam with satisfactory outcomes. Material and Methods: Patients aged more than six years, American society of anaesthesiologists classification (ASA) I or II, procedure that could be finished within one hour like pulpectomies, root canal treatments, extraction and multiple restorations were accepted for conscious sedation. Complete blood count was done and pre-anaesthetic checkup (PAC) with written informed consent from the parent was taken for the dental procedure under conscious sedation. We placed the nasal mask of the Conscious sedation anesthesia machine and made the child inhale Oxygen/Nitrous oxide mixture. After inhaling variable concentration of nitrous oxide/ oxygen mixture in proportion increasing from 30:70 to 70:30, procedure was done. After completion of the procedure, the patient was administered hundred percent oxygen for five minutes. Results: We have done a total of twenty-three cases till now with ages between five to seventeen years. The duration of procedures ranged from 30 min to one and half hour. Two patients less than six years were found to be uncooperative for the procedure. Conclusion: Minimum age group that was suitable for conscious sedation was six years and above. Frequent meetings and counselling by the same team should be facilitated prior to taking up for the procedure.

Intravenous midazolam is frequently used for procedural sedation. Use of ritonavir containing antivirals in patients requiring procedural sedation with intravenous midazolam is postulated to increase the risk or prolong the consequences of exposure related adverse events. The primary objective of this study was to characterize interaction of ritonavir with IV midazolam. The secondary objective was to define the time course over with the interaction of ritonavir with IV midazolam resolves following cessation of ritonavir. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was used to conduct clinical trials with a parallel group design defining exposure to a single 5 mg IV dose of midazolam in the presence and absence of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosed twice daily for 5 days. Simulations comprised 50 virtual healthy subjects aged 20 to 50 years (50% female). Based on FDA criteria, a moderate/strong interaction between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and intravenous midazolam (area under the curve [AUC] ratio >2) was observed when intravenous midazolam was administered up to 72 h following cessation of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The geometric mean (90% CI) midazolam AUC ratio was 9.21 (5.44 to 16.43) when coadministered on the final day of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosing. Importantly, there was no change in peak exposure; the geometric mean (90% CI) midazolam maximum concentration ratio was 0.99 (0.99 to 1.00). Use of ritonavir containing antivirals is unlikely to increase a patient's risk of experiencing an exposure related adverse event following administration of intravenous midazolam but may prolong complications in patients who experience an event. A meaningful interaction persists for 72 h following cessation of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To explore whether monitored anesthesia care is more beneficial to the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods: The research methodology involved comprehensive searches across major databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering the period from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2024. The aim was to identify trials comparing different anesthetic methods for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The primary outcomes assessed were mortality and length of hospital stay, while secondary outcomes included common complications such as bleeding, stroke, paravalvular leakage, renal failure, and others. Data synthesis was conducted using risk ratios or standardized mean differences, along with 95% confidence intervals. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024507749). Results: A total of 35 trials and 45,616 patients were included in this study. The results showed that monitored anesthesia care significantly reduced the patient's risk of death, shortened the patient's length of hospital stay, and also reduced the risk of common complications such as paravalvular leakage (RR, 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.88; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0) and stroke (RR, 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.99; p = 0.04; I2 = 0). Conclusion: Monitored anesthesia care has an absolute advantage in patient survival and effectively shortens the length of hospitalization. In addition, it also reduces the risk of complications such as paravalvular leakage and stroke. Monitoring care under anesthesia plays a vital role during TAVI surgery, not only helping to ensure the smooth progress of the surgery and patient safety, but also promoting the patient's recovery and recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The field of interventional pulmonology has grown immensely and is increasingly recognized as a subspecialty. The new procedures introduced in the last decade pose unique challenges, and anesthesiologists need to readapt to their specific demands. In this review, we extensively discuss the pathophysiology, technical aspects, preprocedural preparation, anesthetic management, and postprocedural challenges of many new procedures such as navigational bronchoscopy, endobronchial valve deployment, and bronchial thermoplasty. Majority of these procedures are performed under general anesthesia with an endotracheal tube. Total intravenous anesthesia with rocuronium as a muscle relaxant seems to be the standard US practice. The easy availability and proven safety and efficacy of sugammadex as a reversal agent of rocuronium has decreased the need for high-dose remifentanil as an agent to avoid muscle relaxants. Additional research is available with regard to the utility of nebulized lidocaine and is discussed. Finally, two newer drugs administered for conscious sedation (typically without the need of an anesthesiologist) are likely to gain popularity in the future. Remimazolam is a new short-acting benzodiazepine with a relatively faster offset of clinical effects. Dexmedetomidine, a selective adrenergic agonist, is increasingly employed in bronchoscopy as a sedative during bronchoscopic procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Introduction: There is uncertainty about the optimal videolaryngoscope for awake tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway. The use of channelled and unchannelled videolaryngoscopy has been reported, but there is a lack of evidence on which is the best option. Methods: We conducted a randomised clinical trial to compare the efficacy of the C‐MAC D‐Blade® vs. Airtraq® in adult patients (aged ≥ 18 y) scheduled for elective or emergency surgery under general anaesthesia with anticipated difficult airway who required awake tracheal intubation under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. The primary endpoint was the first‐attempt tracheal intubation success rate. Secondary outcomes included the overall success rate; number of tracheal intubation attempts; Cormack and Lehane glottic view; level of difficulty (visual analogue score); patient discomfort (visual analogue score); and incidence of complications. Results: Ninety patients (70/90 male (78%); mean (SD) age 65 (12) y) with anticipated difficult airways were randomly allocated to C‐MAC D‐Blade or Airtraq videolaryngoscopy. First‐attempt successful tracheal intubation rate was higher in patients allocated to the C‐MAC D‐Blade group compared with those allocated to the Airtraq group (38/45 (84%) vs. 28/45 (62%), respectively; p = 0.006). The proportion of patients' tracheas that were intubated at the second and third attempt was 4/45 (9%) and 3/45 (7%) in those allocated to the C‐MAC D‐Blade group compared with 14/45 (31%) and 1/45 (2%) in those allocated to the Airtraq group (p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in overall tracheal intubation success rate (C‐MAC D‐Blade group 45/45 (100%) vs. Airtraq group 43/45 (96%), p = 0.494). Discussion: In patients with anticipated difficult airway, first‐attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate was higher with the C‐MAC D‐Blade compared with Airtraq laryngoscopy. No difference was found between the two videolaryngoscopes in overall tracheal intubation success rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sedation and IV xylazine requirements to achieve 45% of baseline head height above ground measurements following oral (PO) administration of 2 trazodone dosages. METHODS: 8 healthy, adult mares of various weights and breeds belonging to a university teaching herd were utilized in a blinded, crossover study design. Horses were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 PO treatments: control (no trazodone), trazodone at 3 mg/kg (low dose [LD]), or trazodone at 6 mg/kg (high dose [HD]). Before treatment, cardiac auscultation, EquiSed sedation score, and head height above ground (HHAG; cm) measurements were performed (baseline) followed by feeding of the treatment mixture. After 120 minutes, sedation score and HHAG were recorded. Xylazine was administered IV (0.25 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.1 mg/kg/min) until HHAG reached 45% of baseline or a total dose of 1 mg/kg was reached. Individual data for xylazine dosage, sedation scores, and HHAG were analyzed using mixed linear models with repeated measures. RESULTS: Sedation scores were significantly improved (LD, P = .045; HD, P = .01) and HHAG was lowered (LD, P = .045; HD, P = .09) by trazodone administration. Xylazine dose requirements were increased by LD trazodone administration (increase of 0.26 ± 0.26 mg/kg; P = .03) and unchanged by HD (increase of 0.13 ± 0.25 mg/kg; P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: Oral trazodone administration increases quantifiable sedation in horses. Xylazine requirements are significantly increased by LD trazodone administration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Oral administration of LD trazodone may increase xylazine requirements. Further clinical studies are required to fully assess the CLINICAL RELEVANCE: of this finding on other parameters such as cardiovascular physiology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Optimal sedation assessment in critically ill children remains challenging due to the subjective nature of behavioral scales and intermittent evaluation schedules. This study aimed to develop a deep learning model based on heart rate variability (HRV) parameters and vital signs to predict effective and safe sedation levels in pediatric patients. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary children's hospital. We developed deep learning models incorporating HRV parameters extracted from electrocardiogram waveforms and vital signs to predict Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The data were split into training, validation, and test sets (6:2:2), and the models were developed using a 1D ResNet architecture. Results: Analysis of 4,193 feature sets from 324 patients achieved excellent discrimination ability, with AUROC values of 0.867, 0.868, 0.858, 0.851, and 0.811 for whole number RASS thresholds of -5 to -1, respectively. AUPRC values ranged from 0.928 to 0.623, showing superior performance in deeper sedation levels. The HRV metric SDANN2 showed the highest feature importance, followed by systolic blood pressure and heart rate. Conclusions: A combination of HRV parameters and vital signs can effectively predict sedation levels in pediatric patients, offering the potential for automated and continuous sedation monitoring in pediatric intensive care settings. Future multi-center validation studies are needed to establish broader applicability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background With the increasing complexity and prolonged duration of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures, sedation shifted from conscious sedation with benzodiazepines to deep sedation with propofol. We assessed the technical success and adverse event rates of ERCP with deep versus conscious sedation. Methods Consecutive patients treated with ERCP in the University Medical Center Utrecht over a 7-year period (2010-2016) were screened for eligibility. Gastroenterologist-administered conscious sedation with midazolam was used from 2010-2013, whilst anesthesiology-administered deep sedation with propofol was used from 2013-2016. Data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records. Outcomes were technical success and procedure-related adverse events within 30 days after ERCP. Associations of sedation type with outcomes were analyzed in univariable and multivariable analyses. Results A total of 725 patients were included: 336 (46%) with conscious sedation and 389 (54%) with deep sedation. Technical success was significantly higher when propofol-based sedation was used (317 [82%] vs. 252 [75%], P=0.034). Adverse events also occurred significantly more often in the propofol group (77 [20%] vs. 38 [11%], P=0.002), due to higher rates of post-ERCP cholangitis (21 [5%] vs. 8 [2%], P=0.039), and post-ERCP pancreatitis (29 [7%] vs. 11 [3%], P=0.014). After adjustment, propofol-based sedation remained significantly associated with technical success and adverse events, with odds ratios of 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.21) and 1.95 (95% CI 1.25-3.04), respectively. Conclusion Propofol-based sedation resulted significantly more often in technical success of ERCP compared with midazolam-based sedation, but adverse events were almost twice as common, with higher rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis and cholangitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) can be performed using diverse anesthetic approaches ranging from moderate sedation (MS) to general anesthesia (GA), and guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Prior studies have demonstrated shorter time in lab for heart rhythm procedures performed under MS. The objective of this study was to compare laboratory times, acute procedural outcomes and complication rates for LAAO procedures performed using MS and 4‐dimensional ICE as opposed to GA. Methods and Results: This was a retrospective observational cohort study of 135 consecutive patients who were referred for LAAO to be performed with either GA or MS between June 2022 and April 2024. The primary endpoints were total laboratory time, procedure time, nonprocedure time, and fluoroscopy time. The secondary endpoints were stroke, peri‐device leak (>5 mm), device‐related left atrial thrombus, cardiovascular mortality, and all‐cause mortality at 45 days and 6 months postprocedure, where data were available. The mean age of patients in the study was 78.8 ± 7.8 years and 64.4% were male with no difference between GA and MS. In the MS group, 4D‐ICE was used for intraprocedural imaging in 95.5% of patients and 2 dimensional‐ICE (2D‐ICE) was used in 4.5% of patients. In the GA group, intra‐procedural imaging was done using TEE in 51.5%, 2D‐ICE in 32.4% and 4D‐ICE in 16.2% of cases. Total laboratory time was significantly lower in the MS group compared to the GA group (68.3 ± 23.1 vs 117.1 ± 34.3 min; p < 0.001), due to shorter nonprocedure time (15.2 ± 9.1 vs 63.7 ± 22.0 min; p < 0.001), with no significant difference in procedure time and fluoroscopy time. There was no significant difference in complications at 45 days and 6 months postprocedure. Conclusion: In this single center study, MS reduced total lab time by reducing nonprocedure time when compared to GA for LAAO, without affecting clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Remifentanil and fentanyl are potent opioid analgesics commonly used during surgery due to their distinct pharmacological profiles. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a generic remifentanil (test drug) with fentanyl and Ultiva (innovator formulation) during general anaesthesia in the Indian population. Methods: This phase III, multi-centre (n = 13), randomised, three-arm, comparative study was conducted from 24 November 2021 to 31 March 2022. Eligible subjects scheduled for elective therapeutic and diagnostic surgical procedures (n = 314) were randomised into generic remifentanil, Ultiva, and fentanyl groups. An independent anaesthetist blinded to treatment allocation assessed efficacy and safety parameters. The primary efficacy endpoint was haemodynamic response during specific activities (endotracheal intubation, skin incision, skin closure, and extubation). Results: The study groups exhibited no significant differences in demographic and baseline characteristics. Heart rate was similar between the remifentanil and Ultiva groups measured during laryngeal intubation, skin incision, skin closure, and extubation (P > 0.05 in all four procedures). Heart rate was significantly higher in the fentanyl group in comparison to the remifentanil group during laryngeal intubation (P = 0.035), skin incision (P = 0.017), skin closure (P = 0.001), and extubation (P = 0.026). The need for vasopressor and anti-cholinergic drugs was similar between groups, and no subject required naloxone administration. Conclusion: Our study's findings demonstrated that generic remifentanil is non-inferior to fentanyl and equivalent to Ultiva for general anaesthesia in Indian patients undergoing various surgical and diagnostic procedures. Remifentanil offers advantages in terms of optimum haemodynamic stability, fast equilibrating analgesia, and rapid emergence from sedation, making it a suitable alternative to fentanyl. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose/objectives: A precordial stethoscope (PS) is essential for ensuring clear breath sounds during open airway sedations. However, a traditional PS limits the ability of new users to simultaneously listen to heart and lung sounds alongside experienced practitioners, hindering their learning and development. Bluetooth speaker systems allow for multiple providers but amplify all noise. An artificial intelligence (AI) PS has the potential to selectively reduce ambient noise, allowing multiple providers to monitor concurrently and provides a visual representation of the sound waves. The study looks at the benefits of AI PS in teaching in the dental setting. Methods: A questionnaire was created to compare the new AI PS to a conventional PS during intravenous moderate sedation in a dental clinic setting. Results: Sixteen individuals involved in sedations (four dental attendings, seven dental residents, and five dental assistants), were polled with a 100% response rate. 75% of participants agreed that clarity was improved using the AI PS and 81.25% of participants agreed that breath sounds and loudness were improved using the AI PS. 93.75% reported the AI PS was beneficial in allowing attendees to concurrently monitor a sedation case alongside dental residents. 100% of assistants reported that the AI PS benefited from their participation in sedation cases. Conclusion: As technology advances, it is important that we as providers continue to evolve and consider implementing AI to improve our ability to monitor patients and enhance educational experiences for dental resident trainees. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We explored the efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation in painless colonoscopy. Methods: A total of 195 patients who underwent painless colonoscopy surgery were randomly divided into three groups: the propofol deep sedation group (group DS), the sufentanil combined with propofol for conscious sedation (group CS1) and the esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation (group CS2). The primary outcomes of this study included the incidence of hypoxemia, hypotension, hypertension, and bradycardia and excellent and good rates of anaesthesia during colonoscopy. The secondary outcomes included perioperative changes in vital signs (MAP, HR, and SpO2), anaesthesia induction time, dischargeable time, patient and endoscopist satisfaction scores, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), drowsiness, dizziness, propofol injection pain, assisted ventilation and vasoactive medications. Results: The incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia in the DS group was significantly greater than that in the CS1 and CS2 groups (χ2 = 7.081, P = 0.029). The incidence of hypotension in the CS2 group was significantly lower than that in the DS and CS1 groups (χ2 = 16.278, P < 0.001). The risk of hypoxemia was 5.727 times higher in Group DS than in Group CS2 (OR 5.727; 95%CI 1.203–27.273), and the risk of hypotension was 9.864 times higher in Group DS than in Group CS2 (OR 9.864; 95%CI 2.770–35.120). The risk of hypotension in Group CS1 was 5.167 times that in Group CS2 (OR 5.167; 95%CI 1.396–19.117). The incidence of propofol injection pain, assisted ventilation, ephedrine usage and drowsiness in the DS group was significantly greater than that in the CS1 and CS2 groups (χ2 = 57.618, P < 0.001; χ2 = 9.544, P = 0.008; χ2 = 14.820, P = 0.001; χ2 = 37.257, P < 0.001). The incidence of dizziness during recovery in the CS1 group was significantly greater than that in the DS and CS2 groups (χ2 = 6.594, P = 0.037). The dischargeable time in the DS group was significantly greater than that in the CS1 and CS2 groups (F = 53.039, P < 0.001). The satisfaction scores of the endoscopist and patients in the DS group were significantly lower than those in the CS1 and CS2 groups (F = 17.390, P < 0.001; F = 19.282; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation can be safely and effectively used for painless colonoscopy and has fewer complications.It is recommended for painless colonoscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dental anxiety is a global problem in the realm of pediatric dentistry. The use of procedural sedation is recommended to avoid substandard or unsafe dental treatment in preschoolers. This study aimed to compare the effect sedation with Dexmedetomidine with or without Midazolam in terms of sedation level, analgesic effect and ease of treatment completion in preschool children. Methods: A triple blind randomized controlled clinical trial comprised 72 healthy uncooperative children, 4–6 years old, were randomly allocated into three groups of 24 patients each: Group I patients were sedated with nebulized 5 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine (DEX), Group II with nebulized 3 μg/kg DEX followed by nebulized 0.3 mg/kg Midazolam (MID), and Group III with nebulized 0.5 mg/kg MID. Along the session, the three regimens were assessed and compared during the sedation level (children responsiveness) using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale, the analgesic effect using the Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale and ease of treatment completion using a separate 5-point scale. Vital signs were recorded before and during sedation, until full recovery. Results: A significant difference was detected regarding children responsiveness during operative procedure in favour of DEX in comparison to MID and DEX/MID groups (P = 0.045). Within the DEX group, a significant difference was recorded regarding children responsiveness at optimum sedation and during the operative procedure (P = 0.04). Although, the analgesic effects of sedative drugs showed no statistically significant difference among the study groups (P = 0.20), the ease of treatment completion was statistically higher in the DEX than MID and DEX/MID groups (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine provides a moderate level of sedation, that allowed better patient cooperation, and easy completion of performed dental procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The healthcare professional who performs sedation for digestive endoscopy procedures is usually the nurse. Therefore, knowledge and training on the part of the nurse is an important factor for the correct sedation of the patient and may affect, among other factors, the quality of health care and the recovery and well-being of the patient. Objective: To determine the training opportunities and resources available to the specialists involved in digestive endoscopy services in hospitals in Spain in which sedation is performed by the nursing staff. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study performed in the Digestive Endoscopy Service at Toledo University Hospital and nearby hospitals in central Spain. The sample consisted of 75 nurses who administer sedation in digestive endoscopic procedures. Results: Regarding the training of nurses, the vast majority were generalist nurses, and only a small percentage obtained specialized training through ongoing training. Most had been working in the service for more than two years, and very few had previous experience in sedation, although the vast majority currently applied sedation. Life support training was also critical. There were significant differences in the availability of resources between different hospitals. Conclusions: The training of nurses who perform sedation in digestive endoscopy services could be improved since there is a high proportion of personnel without specific training in sedation before starting to work in the service. It is crucial to implement targeted and ongoing training programs to improve competencies in this area, as they are essential to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. Given the variability in resources and personnel training that exists between different hospitals, it seems important to establish standards at the institutional level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pediatric sedation is a crucial tool for minimizing pain and anxiety during procedures and examinations in children. However, it is not without risks. This review provides a comprehensive review of pediatric sedation, including both established practices and recent advancements. A thorough pre-procedural evaluation is crucial to mitigate these risks. Skilled healthcare professionals trained in pediatric sedation are paramount to ensure a safe and effective procedure. The choice of sedative medication depends on various factors, such as the type of procedure and the patient’s medical condition. Sedative medications, whether used alone or in combination, provide sedation with different onset times and durations. Non-pharmacological approaches can complement pharmacological sedation and further reduce potential complications. Preventing sedation-related complications requires a multidisciplinary approach. This includes collaborative decision-making, vigilant monitoring throughout the procedure, and a focus on patient safety. Recovery involves ensuring the child returns to their baseline status before discharge, following established criteria. In conclusion, successful pediatric sedation hinges on a comprehensive strategy. This strategy encompasses a thorough evaluation, skilled personnel, appropriate medication selection, vigilant monitoring, and a focus on patient safety throughout the process. By following these steps, we can minimize risks and achieve successful outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]