Search

This report contains a summary and analysis of public response to the Water Resources Council proposed principles and standards and its accompanying draft environmental impact statement for planning the use of water and related land resources as well as planning and evaluating water and related land resources programs and projects. Both written and oral statements (4,782) received in public review from interested citizens, persons speaking on behalf of organizations, and elected officials are compiled in the summary/analysis. Part I records quoted and summarized excerpts from the public record as well as general responses. Part II provides an analysis of public comment on issues identified in the public record. Generally the issues fall into the following major areas: (1) Implementation of the Principles and Standards, (2) Objectives, (3) Criteria for plan formulation and evaluation, (4) Program coverage and coordination, (5) Output and beneficiaries, (6) Cost sharing and allocation, and (7) Environmental statement. The treatment of each issue consists of a statement of the issue as proposed in the Principles and Standards, the frequency distribution of the views and comments on various sides of an issue, and a summary of the comments on one or both sides. Principles and Standards appeared in the Federal Register, December 21, 1971, Volume 36, Part II (ED 058 070). (BL)

The leading cause of death in the United States today is cardiovascular disease. Approximately one million Americans die each year from problems associated with cardiovascular disease. Factors such as smoking, genetics, poor diet, lack of exercise, and Type A behavioral tendencies (typically involving impatience, competitiveness, need for control, and hostility) have been shown to be related to increased risk of cardiovascular problems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between Type A personality factors and persistence on challenging cognitive tasks presented under two distinct attention conditions. Ninety undergraduate college students served as subjects, and were divided into three groups: Type A's, Type B's (those with opposite characteristics of Type A's), and Type X*s (those with an equivalent balance of Type A and B tendencies). An equal number of males and females were included in each group. The experimental manipulation involved presentation of two unsolvable tasks in one of two ways. Subjects were required to either work on the tasks in rapid, alternating succession (concurrent processing) or work on one task at a time (sequential processing) until they voluntarily chose to stop work on the tasks. Heart rate and skin temperature readings were also recorded during time on tasks to assess physiological reactivity to challenging situations. Results showed that task presentation method (concurrent and sequential processing) had the most significant effect on task persistence. Those assigned to the sequential method worked on the tasks for significantly longer time periods than those assigned to the concurrent method. This effect was particularly evident among the Type X subjects. Gender and personality type also contributed moderately to time spent on separate tasks. Specific personality factors found to be related to Type A traits were impatience, competitiveness, and anger. Physiological data indicated that females had slightly higher heart rates than males prior to the experimental tasks, but neither heart rate or skin temperature emerged as significant factors associated with time on the tasks. The information from this study suggests that the way that difficult tasks are presented to individuals may influence their willingness to continue to work on the tasks. Gender and personality factors are also important considerations when working on specific types of tasks.

Not available