1. Measuring communication as a core outcome in aphasia trials:Results of the ROMA-2 international core outcome set development meeting
- Author
-
Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T. A., Alyahya, R. S. W., Babbitt, E., Beeke, S., de Beer, C., Bose, A., Bowen, A., Brady, M. C., Breitenstein, C., Bruehl, S., Bryant, L., Cheng, B. B. Y., Cherney, L. R., Conroy, P., Copland, D. A., Croteau, C., Cruice, M., Dipper, L., Hilari, K., Howe, T., Kelly, H., Kiran, S., Laska, A. C., Marshall, J., Murray, L. L., Patterson, J., Pearl, G., Quinting, J., Rochon, E., Rose, M. L., Rubi-Fessen, I., Sage, K., Simmons-Mackie, N., Visch-Brink, E., Volkmer, A., Webster, J., Whitworth, A., Dorze, G. L., Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T. A., Alyahya, R. S. W., Babbitt, E., Beeke, S., de Beer, C., Bose, A., Bowen, A., Brady, M. C., Breitenstein, C., Bruehl, S., Bryant, L., Cheng, B. B. Y., Cherney, L. R., Conroy, P., Copland, D. A., Croteau, C., Cruice, M., Dipper, L., Hilari, K., Howe, T., Kelly, H., Kiran, S., Laska, A. C., Marshall, J., Murray, L. L., Patterson, J., Pearl, G., Quinting, J., Rochon, E., Rose, M. L., Rubi-Fessen, I., Sage, K., Simmons-Mackie, N., Visch-Brink, E., Volkmer, A., Webster, J., Whitworth, A., and Dorze, G. L.
- Abstract
Background: Evidence-based recommendations for a core outcome set (COS; minimum set of outcomes) for aphasia treatment research have been developed (the Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia—ROMA, COS). Five recommended core outcome constructs: communication, language, quality of life, emotional well-being and patient-reported satisfaction/impact of treatment, were identified through three international consensus studies. Constructs were paired with outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) during an international consensus meeting (ROMA-1). Before the current study (ROMA-2), agreement had not been reached on OMIs for the constructs of communication or patient-reported satisfaction/impact of treatment. Aim: To establish consensus on a communication OMI for inclusion in the ROMA COS. Methods & Procedures: Research methods were based on recommendations from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative. Participants with expertise in design and conduct of aphasia trials, measurement instrument development/testing and/or communication outcome measurement were recruited through an open call. Before the consensus meeting, participants agreed on a definition of communication, identified appropriate OMIs, extracted their measurement properties and established criteria for their quality assessment. During the consensus meeting they short-listed OMIs and participants without conflicts of interest voted on the two most highly ranked instruments. Consensus was defined a priori as agreement by ≥ 70% of participants. Outcomes & Results: In total, 40 researchers from nine countries participated in ROMA-2 (including four facilitators and three-panel members who participated in pre-meeting activities only). A total of 20 OMIs were identified and evaluated. Eight short-listed communication measures were further evaluated for their measurement properties and ranked. Participants in the consensus meeting (n = 33) who did not have conflicts of interest
- Published
- 2023