Search

Introduction: Affecting more than 3.9 million Americans, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) attacks the liver by causing inflammation. Left untreated, HCV can lead to serious consequences. Targeting high-risk individuals in the inpatient psychiatric setting can lead to increased testing and referral. Aims: This quality improvement project determined whether an intervention—consisting of a pretest, educational session, posttest, and screening implementation—increased staff knowledge about HCV screening recommendations, identified at-risk individuals, and increased the number of patients screened and referred for treatment. Method: An online HCV educational session was provided to 30 staff at a Midwest regional psychiatric unit. An online pre/posttest was conducted to determine staff knowledge and understanding prior to and after the educational session. An HCV screening tool checklist was incorporated into the electronic health record (EHR) system. A 3-month pre/post-intervention chart review was completed to determine the number of patients identified and screened for HCV. Results: A comparison of the 30 staff members' mean pre/posttest scores were calculated using an unpaired t test, showing a prescore mean of 55.15 ± 19.09 and a postscore mean of 85.75 ± 13.44, p <.001. A chi-square analysis indicated that there was a statistically significant post-intervention increase in the percentage of high-risk patients identified (5.6%–36.4%, p <.001) and screened (5.6%–31.4%, p <.001) for HCV compared with pre-intervention. Conclusion: The study intervention increased staff knowledge of HCV guidelines and the number of at-risk patients identified and screened for the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The administration errors are the predominant subpart of medication errors that is the third leading cause of deaths in the United States. It has been documented by World Health Organization (WHO) that most health team members are untrained about safe injection administration practices and, therefore, liable to error. The current study was conducted in Emergency and Endocrinology department of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar with the aim to assess safe injection practices recommended by WHO in a tertiary care hospital. Material & Methods: The CDC guidelines were used and data was collected while using WHO prescription indicators. Results: The 30 days concurrent study was conducted on 350 patients in which 62.8% were male, and 37.2% were female. Patients were typical in the age ranges from 50-75 years. The CDC 8 steps guidelines were not followed in letter and spirit. Out of total steps, step one was wholly followed for 350 patients, step two followed for 300 patients, step three followed for 290 patients, step four for 300 patients, step five for 310 patients, step six for 290 patients, step seven was entirely ignored and step eight was not observed in the current sample of the study. The total percent deviations from the standard were (24.9%). Conclusion: The CDC guideline was not followed up to the mark for the administration of drugs in the hospital.

Background“As part of the U.S. government's urgent response to the epidemic of overdose deaths (1)” the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued the “CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain-United States, 2016 (2)” (guideline) followed by the “CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids–United States, 2022 (3) (guideline update). ” The guideline and guideline update cite a direct correlation between prescription opioids sales (POS) and opioid treatment admissions (OTA) and prescription opioid deaths (POD), which was based on data from 1999 to 2010. This paper updates those relationships and includes the correlations between prescription opioid sales (POS) and any opioid deaths (AOD) and total overdose deaths (TOD) from 2010 to 2019.MethodsLinear regression models were fit to each response separately. Opioid sales (measured as MME (morphine milligram equivalent) per capita) was the independent variable. Total overdose deaths (TOD), any opioid overdose deaths (AOD), prescription opioid overdose deaths (POD) and opioid treatment admissions (OTA) were the dependent, response variables. The models were assessed using three criteria: the statistical significance of the model (Overall P-Value), the quality of the fit (R2), and the sign of the slope coefficient (positive or negative).ResultsThe analyses revealed that the direct correlations (i.e., significant, positive slopes) reported by the CDC based on data from 1999 to 2010 no longer exist. Based on data from 2010 to 2019, the relationships either have reversed (i.e., significant, negative slopes) or are non-existent (i.e., no significant model).ConclusionsThe guideline, guideline update, CDC's public, medical profession, and intergovernmental communications should be corrected/updated to state no direct correlation has existed between POS to OTA, POD, AOD, and TOD since 2010. Individualized patient care and public health policy should be amended accordingly.

Background: In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a guideline on opioid prescribing for primary care physicians. Patients with chronic pain receiving long-term opioid therapy were surveyed to assess the incidence and impact of opioid dose reduction following this guideline's promulgation. Methods: Members of an advocacy organization for people with chronic pain were invited to participate in a 16-item, anonymous, online survey conducted in September/October 2017. Eligibility requirements included current treatment of ≥7 months' duration for chronic pain with the same extended-release (ER)/long-acting (LA) opioid. The final sample consisted of respondents who reported being on the same ER/LA opioid for ≥1 year and excluded respondents whose 1) ER/LA opioid dose increased; 2) ER/LA opioid dose decreased and immediate-release (IR) opioid dose increased; and 3) ER/LA opioid dose was unchanged and IR opioid dose was changed. Survey results were analyzed using z-test to ascertain differences between proportion of responses for ER/LA opioid dose decreased vs dose unchanged groups. Results: Of the 511 eligible respondents, 362 respondents were included in the final sample. In the final sample, the subgroup with decreased ER/LA opioid dose (n=149) was significantly more likely (P≤ 0.05) than those who reported no dose change (n=213) to rate their condition as "worse" for level of pain (73.2 vs 33.3%), level of function (67.8 vs 31.5%), mental health (64.4  vs 32.9%), ability to work (62.9% of 97 respondents vs 33.8% of 145 respondents), and interpersonal relationships (48.3 vs 25.8%) during the previous 6 months. Conclusion: In this Internet-based survey of people with chronic pain, reduction of ER/LA opioid dose was associated with reduced pain control and diminished function. These results indicate a need for further guidance on how to apply the CDC guideline to patients with chronic pain who are stable on long-term opioid therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inappropriate prescribing of opioids is thought to play a central role in the ongoing opioid health crisis. Tertiary information resources are commonly used by clinicians for obtaining opioid dosing information. To assist health care providers in pain management, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed a guideline for prescribing opioids. Objective: To identify discrepancies for dosing information on oxycodone between commonly used tertiary drug information resources and the CDC Guideline. Methods: Searches of the tertiary drug information resources were conducted in the following order: Facts and Comparisons, Lexicomp, Medscape, and Micromedex. The term "oxycodone" was entered in the search box in the tertiary resources' applications. Drug information items retrieved were organized in tabular format. In the Google Chrome version 106.0.5249.119 search box, the term "CDC guideline for opioid dosing" was entered to retrieve current information on the CDC Guideline. Results: Searches produced drug information on oxycodone for available formulations, dosing regimens, recommended dosing, and maximum daily dose (MDD). Searches revealed discrepancies in dosing recommendations for oxycodone among tertiary drug resources and between tertiary drug resources and the CDC Guideline. Conclusions: When considering maximum daily dosing information for oxycodone from the selected tertiary drug information resources, the potential exists for patients to be at risk of addiction, overdose, and perhaps death. Improving the way opioids are prescribed through the CDC Clinical Practice Guideline can ensure patients have access to safer, more effective chronic pain treatment while reducing the number of people who misuse or overdose from inappropriate dosing information., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2023.)

To clarify the discrepancy in the incidence and severity of surgical site infections (SSI) for radical cystectomy between reports based on the CDC guideline and those using the Clavien-Dindo classification we evaluated 449 consecutive patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer between 1990 and 2012. Of the 115 (25.6%) patients with SSI defined by the CDC guideline, 89 could be analyzed. We compared the SSI rates and severity defined by the CDC guideline and Clavien-Dindo classifications. There were 58 patients with superficial SSI, 16 with deep SSI, and 15 with organ/space SSI according to the CDC guideline. All patients with organ/space SSI were judged as “not having SSI” by the Clavien-Dindo classification. They were classified as having “intestinal prolapse”, “intestinal fistula”, “abdominal abscess” and “pelvic abscess.” There was a significant association between the treatment duration and depth of SSI based on the CDC guideline by Spearman's rank-correlation coefficient ( p < 0.001, r = 0.614) and with the grade of complications ( p < 0.001, r = 0.632) in the Clavien-Dindo classification. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with grade III SSI in the Clavien-Dindo classification needed a significantly longer treatment duration. It is necessary to be aware that a discrepancy can occur automatically due to the different natures of the definitions. Using the CDC guideline, we can effectively estimate the future treatment period when SSI occurs. With the Clavien-Dindo classification, grade III SSI requires a longer treatment duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Since publication of the CDC 2016 Guideline, opioid-related mortality in the USA has doubled and a crisis has developed among the 15-20 million Americans with chronic, moderate-to-severe, noncancer pain. Our aim was to develop a comprehensive alternative approach to management of chronic pain. Methods: Analytic review of the clinical literature. Results: Published science provides a solid framework for the management of chronic non-cancer pain, detailed here, even as it leaves many knowledge gaps, which we fill with insights from clinical experience. Conclusion: There is a sufficient basis in science and in clinical experience to achieve adequate control of chronic pain in nearly all patients in a way that adequately balances benefits and potential harms.

Background: "As part of the U.S. government's urgent response to the epidemic of overdose deaths (1)" the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued the "CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain-United States, 2016 (2)" (guideline) followed by the "CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids-United States, 2022 (3) (guideline update). " The guideline and guideline update cite a direct correlation between prescription opioids sales (POS) and opioid treatment admissions (OTA) and prescription opioid deaths (POD), which was based on data from 1999 to 2010. This paper updates those relationships and includes the correlations between prescription opioid sales (POS) and any opioid deaths (AOD) and total overdose deaths (TOD) from 2010 to 2019., Methods: Linear regression models were fit to each response separately. Opioid sales (measured as MME (morphine milligram equivalent) per capita) was the independent variable. Total overdose deaths (TOD), any opioid overdose deaths (AOD), prescription opioid overdose deaths (POD) and opioid treatment admissions (OTA) were the dependent, response variables. The models were assessed using three criteria: the statistical significance of the model (Overall P -Value), the quality of the fit ( R 2 ), and the sign of the slope coefficient (positive or negative)., Results: The analyses revealed that the direct correlations (i.e., significant, positive slopes) reported by the CDC based on data from 1999 to 2010 no longer exist. Based on data from 2010 to 2019, the relationships either have reversed (i.e., significant, negative slopes) or are non-existent (i.e., no significant model)., Conclusions: The guideline, guideline update, CDC's public, medical profession, and intergovernmental communications should be corrected/updated to state no direct correlation has existed between POS to OTA, POD, AOD, and TOD since 2010. Individualized patient care and public health policy should be amended accordingly., Competing Interests: Author BC was employed by Carr Consulting, United States. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Aubry and Carr.)

Background: Important characteristics for ideal skin preparations include long-lasting antimicrobial efficacy and low potential for skin irritation. Methods: A total of 55 healthy adult subjects were enrolled to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of 3 test formulations applied to inguinal, abdominal, and antecubital sites at post-treatment time points of 30 seconds, 72 hours, and 7 days. To investigate skin irritation potential, the 3 formulations were tested in a 21-day repeat-insult patch test conducted on the skin of the backs of 23 healthy subjects. Results: The mean log10 reduction (MLR) at 7 days post-treatment produced by a 79% vol/vol ethanol containing 1% wt/vol chlorhexidine gluconate (1% CHG-EtOH) applied to abdominal sites was significantly superior to that produced by a 10% povidone-iodine solution (2.45 MLR vs 0.90 MLR; P < .05). The 1% CHG-EtOH and a 70% vol/vol isopropanol containing 2% wt/vol CHG (2% CHG-IPA) provided statistically equivalent persistence at 72 hours and 7 days post-treatment. The 1% CHG-EtOH had less skin irritation poetntial than the 2% CHG-IPA and the 10% povidone-iodine solution, although the differences were not statistically significant (P > .05). Conclusion: Considering its persistent effect and low skin irritation potential, the 1% CHG-EtOH preparation is expected to perform well in surgical site preparation to reduce the risk of surgery- and catheter-related bloodstream infection. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The 2016 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain (Guideline hereafter) emphasized tapering patients from long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) when the harms outweigh the benefits.Methods: To examine tapering from LTOT before and after the Guideline release, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with high-dose LTOT (mean of >50 Morphine Milligram Equivalents [MME]/day) from 2014 to 2018 from one Midwest state's Health Information Exchange. We identified tapering (dose reductions in mean MME/day greater than 15%, 30%, 50%) and rapid discontinuation episodes (reduction to zero MME/day) over a 6-month follow-up period relative to a 3-month baseline period. We used segmented regressions to estimate outcomes adjusted for time trends and relevant state laws limiting opioid prescribing.Results: The Guideline release was associated with statistically significant immediate increase in the patient likelihood of experiencing tapering (15%: 1.8% point [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-2.6; 30%: 1.4% point, 95% CI: 0.7-2.2; 50%: 0.8% point, 95% CI: 0.2-1.4) and rapid discontinuation episodes (0.006% point, 95% CI: 0.001-0.01). After the Guideline release, the patient likelihood of tapering increased over time (15%: 0.4% point/month, 95% CI: 0.3-0.5; 30%: 0.3% point/month, 95% CI:0.2-0.4; 50%: 0.3% point/month, 95% CI: 0.2-0.3; rapid discontinuation: 0.01% point/month, 95% CI: 0.007-0.01). Tapering and rapid discontinuation trends was similar among gender and race categories.Conclusion: The Guideline may be a useful tool in altering opioid prescribing practices, particularly for patients on shorter durations of LTOT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]