Search

Abstract The COVID-19 disease is an ongoing global health concern. Although vaccination provides some protection, people are still susceptible to re-infection. Ostensibly, certain populations or clinical groups may be more vulnerable. Factors causing these differences are unclear and whilst socioeconomic and cultural differences are likely to be important, human genetic factors could influence susceptibility. Experimental studies indicate SARS-CoV-2 uses innate immune suppression as a strategy to speed-up entry and replication into the host cell. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the impact of variants in immunity-associated human proteins on susceptibility to COVID-19. In this work, we analysed missense coding variants in several SARS-CoV-2 proteins and their human protein interactors that could enhance binding affinity to SARS-CoV-2. We curated a dataset of 19 SARS-CoV-2: human protein 3D-complexes, from the experimentally determined structures in the Protein Data Bank and models built using AlphaFold2-multimer, and analysed the impact of missense variants occurring in the protein–protein interface region. We analysed 468 missense variants from human proteins and 212 variants from SARS-CoV-2 proteins and computationally predicted their impacts on binding affinities for the human viral protein complexes. We predicted a total of 26 affinity-enhancing variants from 13 human proteins implicated in increased binding affinity to SARS-CoV-2. These include key-immunity associated genes (TOMM70, ISG15, IFIH1, IFIT2, RPS3, PALS1, NUP98, AXL, ARF6, TRIMM, TRIM25) as well as important spike receptors (KREMEN1, AXL and ACE2). We report both common (e.g., Y13N in IFIH1) and rare variants in these proteins and discuss their likely structural and functional impact, using information on known and predicted functional sites. Potential mechanisms associated with immune suppression implicated by these variants are discussed. Occurrence of certain predicted affinity-enhancing variants should be monitored as they could lead to increased susceptibility and reduced immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals/populations carrying them. Our analyses aid in understanding the potential impact of genetic variation in immunity-associated proteins on COVID-19 susceptibility and help guide drug-repurposing strategies.

A quantitative feature-vector representation/model of tertiary structural motifs of proteins is presented. Multiclass logistic regression and a probabilistic neural network were employed to apply this representation to large data sets in order to classify them into major families of distinct motif types (including those of functional importance) with high statistical confidence. Scatter plots of random samples of these motifs were obtained through two-dimensional transformation of the feature vector by metric MDS (multidimensional scaling). The plots showed distinct clusters and shapes for different families and demonstrated the relevance and importance of the proposed quantitative feature-vector representation for characterizing protein tertiary structural motifs. The relative importance of the features was analyzed. The scope of the present work to investigate Nature's prioritization and optimization of functional motif structures is highlighted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Seven protein structure comparison methods and two sequence comparison programs were evaluated on their ability to detect either protein homologs or domains with the same topology (fold) as defined by the CATH structure database. The structure alignment programs Dali, Structal, Combinatorial Extension (CE), VAST, and Matras were tested along with SGM and PRIDE, which calculate a structural distance between two domains without aligning them. We also tested two sequence alignment programs, SSEARCH and PSI-BLAST. Depending upon the level of selectivity and error model, structure alignment programs can detect roughly twice as many homologous domains in CATH as sequence alignment programs. Dali finds the most homologs, 321-533 of 1120 possible true positives (28.7%-45.7%), at an error rate of 0.1 errors per query (EPQ), whereas PSI-BLAST finds 365 true positives (32.6%), regardless of the error model. At an EPQ of 1.0, Dali finds 42%-70% of possible homologs, whereas Matras finds 49%-57%; PSI-BLAST finds 36.9%. However, Dali achieves >84% coverage before the first error for half of the families tested. Dali and PSI-BLAST find 9.2% and 5.2%, respectively, of the 7056 possible topology pairs at an EPQ of 0.1 and 19.5, and 5.9% at an EPQ of 1.0. Most statistical significance estimates reported by the structural alignment programs overestimate the significance of an alignment by orders of magnitude when compared with the actual distribution of errors. These results help quantify the statistical distinction between analogous and homologous structures, and provide a benchmark for structure comparison statistics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]