Search

Drug development is complex and costly. Clinical trial participants take on risks, making it essential to maximize trial efficiency and maintain participant safety. Identifying periods of excessive burden during drug development can inform trial design, ensure patient benefit and prevent harm. This study aims to examine all published clinical trials for cabozantinib to assess patient benefit and burden over time. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional review of interventional clinical trials of cabozantinib for solid cancer treatment. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov. We extracted adverse event rates, median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival and objective response rate (ORR) for each included trial. We calculated frequencies of trial characteristics, cumulative grade 3-5 adverse event rates and cumulative ORRs. Out of 1735 studies, 54 publications were included that involved 6372 participants and 21 cancers. Of the 54 studies in our sample, 31 (57.41%) were single-arm trials and 23 (42.60%) had negative results. Trials among and within various indications had conflicting results over time. Cumulative risk to participants increased over time, and clinical benefit decreased. The findings suggest that the risk profile of cabozantinib increased from 2011 to 2016 and has remained elevated but stable while benefit has decreased over time. The use of non-randomized and single-arm trials is concerning, and more methodologically rigorous trials are needed. The results of trials for different indications are inconsistent, and empirical administration may reduce the drug's efficacy.

Cabozantinib is a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting multiple tyrosine kinases. It improves overall survival and progression-free survival in patients previously treated with sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to the placebo in the phase 3 CELESTIAL trial. A 71-year-old man presented to our hospital for treatment of HCC with chronic hepatitis C. He was refractory to sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, and ramucirumab and started atezolizumab and bevacizumab therapy in November 2020. After administering the second cycle on December 10, 2020, the patient was diagnosed with progressive disease in January 2021. Therefore, cabozantinib (60 mg/day) was initiated on January 14, 2021. As the grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels increased, grade 3 anorexia and a decline in performance status were observed in the first week, and cabozantinib was terminated. His performance status and anorexia gradually improved, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in June 2021 showed complete remission (CR) according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The patient did not show disease progression for 11 months without receiving any treatment for HCC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of CR with cabozantinib in advanced HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Taste and smell disorders (TSDs) can induce diminished interest in food, inadequate nutrient intake, and emotional irregularities, particularly among cancer patients. Previous research found that the main culprits of TSD development in cancer patients are cytotoxic drugs such as taxol, fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, and anthracycline-based drugs. The advent of targeted drugs such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) has significantly extended the survival time of cancer patients, and thus widely used in clinical practice. However, the association between the use of VEGFR-TKIs and the development of TSDs havs not been studied.The adverse event(AE) reports related to VEGFR-TKIs were downloaded from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Disproportionality analysis was conducted to assess the correlation between VEGFR-TKIs and TSDs. The Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQs) were used to analyze the AEs of TSDs. The study found a statistically significant correlation between the occurrence of TSDs and the use of VEGF-TKIs (cabozantinib, axitinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, nintedanib, and lenvatinib).However, the instructions for Nintedanib, Sorafenib and Lenvatinib were not mentioned. Capbottinib demonstrated the highest number of reports(1790 cases), also with the strongest association (ROR 95%CI-low = 16.51; PRR = 16.18; IC025 = 3.96) when analyzing the narrow SMQ of TSDs. Dysgeusia, taste disorder, and ageusia were the most commonly reported preferred terms (PTs) in VEGFR-TKI-related TSDs, accounting for more than 90% of the reported cases. Cabozantinib showed the highest number of reports and strongest correlation with ageusia, taste disorder, parosmia, and anosmia. The study found significant association between the reports of TSDs and the use of VEGFR-TKIs, indicating the monitoring of TSD development and appropriate management in clinical is necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plain Language Summary What is this summary about? This is a plain language summary of an article about the quality-of-life analyses of the CheckMate 9ER study, originally published in the journal The Lancet Oncology. The CheckMate 9ER study compared two different treatment options in people with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which is an advanced form of kidney cancer. Investigators compared a newer drug combination, cabozantinib plus nivolumab (CaboNivo), with another drug called sunitinib. Sunitinib was the standard of care used to treat people with advanced RCC when the study was designed. The purpose of the study was to see whether people diagnosed with advanced RCC lived longer if they were treated with CaboNivo or sunitinib as their first treatment. Their quality of life while on treatment was also measured as part of the study. To understand the effect of treatment on their quality of life, people completed two types of questionnaires at regular intervals during the study. The first was the FACT Kidney Symptom Index (or FKSI-19) questionnaire, designed for people with kidney cancer. FKSI-19 asked questions about people's cancer symptoms and their side effects of cancer treatment, and how these impacted their quality of life. The second questionnaire was the EQ-5D-3L, designed for any person (with or without cancer). EQ-5D-3L asked people to rate five common aspects of health and their overall health. The study also looked at how long it took for quality-of-life questionnaire ratings to worsen. What are the key takeaways? Results for both questionnaires suggested that quality of life was better for people in the CaboNivo group than those in the sunitinib group. People treated with CaboNivo were able to maintain their quality of life for longer than those treated with sunitinib. What are the main conclusions reported by the researchers? Overall, quality-of-life results from the CheckMate 9ER study showed that people treated with CaboNivo lived longer and were less bothered by the impact of their treatment than those treated with sunitinib. Based on these results, CaboNivo is one of the standard-of-care treatments recommended first for people with advanced RCC. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT03141177 (CheckMate 9ER) (ClinicalTrials.gov) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the context of modern cancer therapy, the management of adverse effects of systemic therapies can lead to the avoidance of underdosing and withdrawal and increases in the quality of the therapeutic act and the quality of life. This review offers an overview of the skin-related toxicities associated with Cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor (MKI) that is approved for treating advanced kidney cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and medullary thyroid cancer. It covers the most common dermatological side effects, such as palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia, stomatitis, hair alterations, xerosis, scrotal erythema, and subungual splinter hemorrhages. Additionally, this review includes suggested preventive strategies and management approaches based on the severity of these adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vactosertib, an inhibitor of transforming growth factor β‐receptor type‐1 (TGFBR1) effective in preventing tumor cell proliferation, is approved for treating various cancers by FDA. The literature revealed that no LC–MS/MS method was reported for the quantification of vactosertib. To develop a validated LC–MS/MS method for the quantification of vactosertib in rat plasma, vactosertib and cabozantinib (internal standard [IS]) were detected using Waters LC–MS/MS system in MRM positive ionization mode, with a mixture of 0.2% formic acid and acetonitrile (70:30, v/v) on an Agilent XDB C18 (50 × 2.1 mm, 5 μm) column at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The method was validated in accordance with M10 bioanalytical method validation USFDA guidelines and applied for the determination of pharmacokinetic parameters in rat plasma. The analytes were detected at m/z 400.23 → 289.19 and m/z 502.13 → 323.07 for vactosertib, and IS, respectively. The method demonstrated a sensitivity of 1.0 ng/mL, linearity ranging from 1.0 to 1000.0 ng/mL, an r2 of 0.999, accuracy ranged between 91.60% and 100.70%, and the drug was found to be stable across all freeze–thaw cycles. The results indicated that the method was selective, accurate, and validated for quantification of vactosertib in biological fluids and pharmacokinetic profiling of vactosertib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) responds poorly to current adjuvant therapies, partially due to its immunosuppressive intestinal microenvironment. We found that myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) were enriched in orthotopic tumors due to treatment-induced succinate release, which activated tuft cells and upregulated interleukin 25 (IL-25) and interleukin 13 (IL-13). We engineered a cabozantinib (Cabo)-encapsulated and maytansine (DM1)-conjugated synthetic high-density lipoprotein (ECCD-sHDL) to modulate the tumor microenvironment. DM1 induced immunogenic cell death and promoted the maturation of dendritic cells. Meanwhile, Cabo alleviated DM1-induced succinate release, preventing tuft cell activation, downregulating IL-25 and IL-13 secretion, and reducing intratumoral MDSC infiltration. ECCD-sHDL increased the densities of active cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and M1 macrophages in the tumors, effectively inhibiting tumor growth and metastasis, thereby prolonging survival in murine CRC models. Our study sheds light on the mechanism of treatment-induced immunosuppression in orthotopic CRC and demonstrates that this combinatorial therapy could be an effective treatment for CRC. [Display omitted] • CD-sHDL leads to MDSC infiltration and treatment resistance of orthotopic CRC tumors. • MDSC recruitment is enhanced by succinate-activating tuft cells after chemotherapy. • Cabozantinib reduces CD-sHDL-induced succinate release by inhibiting its synthesis. • ECCD-sHDL inhibits orthotopic CRC by inducing potent anti-tumor immunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This article aims to comprehensively analyze the unique challenges in managing patients with metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC) that develop radioiodine-refractory disease, especially in developing countries in Latin America. We discuss key contentious aspects of their treatment, such as the optimal timing for initiating systemic therapy, the choice of first-line medications, the appropriate timing for requesting molecular interrogation, and the challenges associated with accessing these drugs and molecular panels. Methods: To illustrate these challenges and enhance understanding, we present five real clinical cases from the authors' experiences. Results: Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC) generally have an excellent prognosis, with an overall 10-year survival rate exceeding 97%. However, approximately 5% of DTC patients, especially those with distant metastases, may develop radioiodine-refractory disease, reducing survival rates. Access to medications remains difficult and time-consuming, particularly for patients within the public healthcare system. Urgent discussions on drug pricing involving all stakeholders are imperative. To break free from complacency, stakeholders must prioritize patient well-being by advocating for evidence-based drug pricing, increased participation in clinical trials, and streamlined regulatory processes. Conclusion: Beyond the recognized need for prospective randomized clinical trials to determine the optimal first-line drug and the timing of molecular testing, this type of manuscript plays a pivotal role in stimulating discussions and disseminating comprehensive knowledge about the challenges associated with treating and monitoring patients with radioiodine-refractory thyroid carcinoma, especially in developing countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The current possible treatments of advanced medullary carcinoma (MTC) include different drugs belonging to the class of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): vandetanib, cabozantinb, and selpercatinib. Although the effects of these TKIs have been well described in clinical trials, the real-practice evidence of the effectiveness and safety of these treatment is scant. This real-world case series aims to describe a niche of patients with advanced MTC treated with more than one TKI by focusing on treatment responses and any reported adverse events (AEs) and to provide additional insight on the individualized approach to the management of metastatic MTC. Methods: Five patients with a diagnosis of metastastic MTC, treated with at least two different molecules of TKIs, were retrospectively selected. Results: Three patients obtained a partial response (one with cabozantinb, one with selpercatinib, and one with vandetanib), and two patients obtained disease stability (both of them treated with all three TKIs, the first two lines discontinued for AEs). The AE profile agreed with the known clinical trials AEs except for non-neoplastic ascites related to selpercatinib and lung cavitations of non-neoplastic tissue related to cabozantinb. The latter was an AE never described so far in patients receiving TKIs. Conclusions: The best management of MTC relies on an individualized approach, keeping in mind and dealing with the potential toxicity in order to minimize the treatment withdrawal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas (PDTCs) are rare and aggressive head and neck malignancies with a poor prognosis. Systemic treatment for incurable PDTC consists of multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs) based on extrapolation from the experience with radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Cabozantinib is an approved second-line MKI therapy for DTC, but there are limited data regarding the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib for PDTC. Methods: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective analysis of patients with PDTC who received cabozantinib in any line of therapy. Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, treatment history, toxicity, and clinical outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were primary endpoints and estimated using Kaplan–Meier methodology. Results: Seven patients with PDTC who received cabozantinib were included. 4/7 (57%) patients had a partial response to cabozantinib, while 2/7 (29%) had stable disease (SD) as their best response. The median time on treatment for cabozantinib was 10.53 months. The median PFS from the start of cabozantinib was 12.9 months, and median OS was 14.21 months. Most adverse events to treatment (5/6) were low grade. Two (29%) patients were alive at the date of the last follow-up. Conclusion: Cabozantinib is an effective and reasonably well-tolerated treatment option for patients with PDTC. Prospective studies are needed to further investigate the role of cabozantinib in the treatment of PDTC, alone and in combination with other agents, including checkpoint inhibitors.

Purpose To describe the first reported instance of an acute chorioretinal inflammatory response to cabozantinib. Methods Case report. Results A 54-year-old Asian male presented with blurred vision 2 weeks following the commencement of cabozantinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ophthalmic examination revealed bilateral exudative retinal detachments and choroiditis in a pattern similar to Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease. Further investigations revealed latent tuberculosis (TB), and management of this ocular adverse event was with cabozantinib cessation, high-dose oral prednisone, single-agent anti-TB therapy, and methotrexate. Return of visual function and ocular anatomy occurred within 1 month. Conclusions Modern pharmacotherapy for metastatic cancer may increase survival, but a range of ocular and systemic adverse events are frequently seen. Screening and early intervention can mitigate adverse events and treatment burden, while maximizing benefits for this disadvantaged patient group.

Background: The therapeutic benefit of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy for patients with advanced non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) remains unclear. Patients and methods: We reviewed clinical data from 93 patients with advanced nccRCC who received first-line systemic therapy including IO combination therapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy at our affiliated institutions. Patients were divided based on the period when the treatment was implemented as the standard of care into the IO and TKI eras. Survival and tumor response outcomes were compared between the IO and TKI eras. Results: Of the 93 patients, 50 (54%) and 43 (46%) were categorized as IO era and TKI era groups, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the IO era than in the TKI era (median PFS: 8.97 vs. 4.96 months, p = 0.0152; median OS: 38.4 vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.0001). After the adjustment using other covariates, the treatment era was an independent factor for PFS (hazard ratio: 0.59, p = 0.0235) and OS (hazard ratio: 0.27, p < 0.0001). Objective response and disease control rates was not significantly different between the treatment eras (26% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.268; 62% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.594). Conclusion: The implementation of IO therapy was significantly associated with longer survival in the nccRCC population. Further studies are needed to establish a more effective treatment strategy in this population using multiple regimens of IO combination therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the clinical significance of subtyping (type 1 vs 2) of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) in patients treated with targeted therapy, as well as the concordance, sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of local review pathology review. Methods: Patients with advanced refractory PRCC were randomised to receive sunitinib or cabozantinib, crizotinib or savolitinib, stratified by PRCC subtype (type 1, type 2, or not otherwise specified [NOS]/mixed) by local review. Central review was retrospectively conducted by three expert genitourinary pathologists who independently reviewed cases. The sensitivity and PPV of local review were estimated and outcomes [objective response rate (ORR), progression‐free survival (PFS)] were summarised for treatment groups stratified by subtypes by central review. Results: Amongst the 147 patients reviewed, the prevalence of individual subtypes varied by local or central review (type 1: 17.7% vs 29.3%; type 2: 53.1% vs 45.6%; NOS/mixed: 29.3% vs 25.2%), respectively. Individual cases were frequently reclassified and local pathology review demonstrated low sensitivity (type 1: 48%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 33, 65; type 2: 67%, 95% CI 55, 78; NOS/mixed: 43%, 95% CI 27, 61). The PPVs of local review were 80%, 57.7% and 37% for type 1, 2 and NOS/mixed, respectively. Compared to sunitinib, cabozantinib demonstrated improved PFS for both type 1 and type 2 PRCC subgroups (7.4 vs 9.0 and 2.9 vs 5.6 months, respectfully) as well as higher ORR. Conclusions: The PRCC subtype assignment did not identify a subset of patients with greater clinical benefit from cabozantinib, with significant discordance between local and central review. Our findings confirm the limited clinical value of pathological subtyping of metastatic PRCC, in line with the recent World Health Organisation 2022 guidelines. Patient summary: In this study, categorising papillary renal cell carcinoma into type 1 or 2 subtypes showed limited concordance between central and local pathological review and did not enrich for patients more likely to benefit from cabozantinib in the S1500 PAPMET trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) improve the treatment of refractory thyroid cancer, including radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC) and advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma (aMTC). Objective This study aims to compare the efficacy of MKIs in improving survival outcomes and safety. Data Sources Comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were performed from inception to December 2023. Study Selection Three independent authors selected these studies. Randomized controlled trials that compared the use of a MKI to other MKIs or placebo were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Risk of bias was analyzed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. Treatments were grouped into common nodes based on the type of MKI. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, and adverse events. Results Cabozantinib 60 mg/day (CAB60) was associated with the highest prolonged PFS in RAIR-DTC patients, followed by lentivatinib 18 or 24 mg/day (LEN18 or LEN24), and apatinib. PFS was also improved in aMTC patients who received CAB 140 mg/day (CAB140), CAB60, or anlotinib. A significantly greater improvement on the performance of OS was seen in CAB60, LEN24, anlotinib, and sorafenib in RAIR-DTC patients, but in aMTC patients there were lack of statistical differences. Compared with the low-dose MKIs, high-dose MKIs such as CAB, LEN, and vandetanib increased the incidence of adverse events. Conclusion CAB60, LEN, and apatinib are promising topical MKIs with statistically significant primary outcomes in RAIR-DTC patients, while CAB and anlotinib are effective in prolonging PFS in aMTC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate the outcomes of cabozantinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), focusing on dose setting and modification. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 34 Japanese patients who received cabozantinib for uHCC. Trough concentrations (Ctrough) of cabozantinib were also measured weekly for 6 weeks in the 18 patients. Results: Sixteen patients received ≥40 mg (high‐dose group), and 18 patients received 20 mg (low‐dose group). Dose escalations were performed in 27.8% of the patients in the low‐dose group. Although median duration of the first dose reduction or interruption in the low‐dose group was twice that in the high‐dose group (28 vs. 14 days, p < 0.001), there were no significant differences in the relative dose intensity (RDI) during 6 weeks, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (p = 0.162, p = 0.950, p = 0.817, respectively) between the two groups. Patients who received RDI during 6 weeks ≥33.4% showed a trend toward longer median PFS (p = 0.054). Each serum aldolase value during the 6 weeks was significantly correlated with the Ctrough at any point (r = 0.500, p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, aldolase ≥8.7 U/L within 2 weeks was significantly associated with the very early dose reduction or interruption (odds ratio 20.0, p = 0.002). Conclusions: An initial dose of 20 mg cabozantinib could be a safe option in Japanese patients. The serum aldolase value could be useful for making appropriate dose modifications of cabozantinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cabozantinib, a multi-kinase receptor inhibitor, is utilized in the treatment of advanced malignancies such as metastatic renal cancers. While rare, cabozantinib-induced cardiotoxicity has emerged as a recognized adverse effect with potentially reversible outcomes. We report the case of a 55-year-old male who developed fatal cardiomyopathy 4 months after initiating cabozantinib therapy. Despite its rarity, cardiomyopathy after initiation of cabozantinib can be lethal if not diagnosed early. This case underscores a significant gap in the surveillance of patients treated with newer agents like cabozantinib. Larger observational studies are needed to assess the prevalence and impact of cardiomyopathy after initiation of cabozantinib therapy, and to determine the cost–effectiveness of early surveillance protocols. Article highlights Background Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved cancer survival rates but carry risks of severe adverse effects, including cardiotoxicity. Cabozantinib is a potent TKI used for advanced renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and medullary thyroid carcinoma. Case presentation A 59-year-old male with a history of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and prior heart conditions developed fatal cardiomyopathy 4 months after starting cabozantinib. Initial symptoms included shortness of breath, pedal swelling and weight gain, progressing rapidly to cardiogenic shock. Discussion Cabozantinib-induced cardiomyopathy, though rare, can result from VEGFR inhibition affecting cardiac myocytes. Current guidelines recommend regular cardiac monitoring for early detection of cardiotoxicity in patients on TKIs. Our case reveals potential gaps in surveillance, suggesting the need for improved monitoring protocols. Conclusion Early cardiac monitoring in patients on cabozantinib is crucial for preventing fatal outcomes. Larger studies are needed to understand the incidence and burden of cabozantinib-induced cardiomyopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: ICI-based combinations have led to a significant change in mRCC medical treatment. However, data from real-world (RW) cohorts are rare. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in real-world cohorts from centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. The median PFS in the overall cohort was 18.6 months. We also analyzed subgroups in relation to the IMDC, histology, and with regard to the presence of bone metastasis. In summary, our real-word data support the promising efficacy data of the pivotal trials, particularly in patients with non-ccRCC and those without bone metastases at the start of the treatment. Introduction: Combinations of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care (SOC) for treatment-naive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the RW safety and efficacy of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in mRCC patients. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from twelve cancer centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Patients with advanced or mRCC were eligible. The investigator-based objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated from the start of the treatment to progression or death. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan–Meier (KM) plots were utilized where appropriate. Results: In total, 96 eligible patients (66.6% male) with a median age of 66.0 years were included. The most common histology was clear-cell RCC (ccRCC) in 63.4% (n = 61). A prior nephrectomy was performed in 60.4% (n = 58). ECOG 0-1 was 68.8% (n = 66). A partial response was documented in 43.8% of patients (n = 42), a stable disease in 32.3% (n = 31), and a progressive disease in 8.3% (n = 8) as the best overall response. Response data were not evaluable in 13.5% (n = 13). The median follow-up time was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.0–15.3). The PFS rate at 6 months was 89.8% in the overall population (86.8% for ccRCC; 90.0% for non-ccRCC). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 82.3% (n = 79) for all grades and 41.7% (n = 40) for grades 3–5. Elevated liver enzymes (34.4%), diarrhea (31.3%), and hand–foot syndrome (29.2%) were the three most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. Discussion/Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of mRCC patients, the application of cabozantinib plus nivolumab was shown to be safe and feasible. Our data support the use of cabozantinib plus nivolumab as a first-line standard therapy in mRCC patients. Major limitations were the retrospective data capture and short follow-up time of our study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message: Maintaining good medication adherence is important for providing desirable outcomes from medication therapy. We showed that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) contributed to the identification of low medication adherence to cabozantinib in a patient with cancer. We present an educational case to assist with understanding TDM in a patient with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the differential efficacy of first‐line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)‐based combined therapies among patients with intermediate‐ and poor‐risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), as recently, the efficacy of triplet therapy comprising nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus cabozantinib has been published. Patients and Methods: Three databases were searched in December 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing oncological outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with first‐line ICI‐based combined therapies. We performed network meta‐analysis (NMA) to compare the outcomes, including progression‐free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORRs), in patients with intermediate‐ and poor‐risk mRCC; we also assessed treatment‐related adverse events. Results: Overall, seven RCTs were included in the meta‐analyses and NMAs. Treatment ranking analysis revealed that pembrolizumab + lenvatinib (99%) had the highest likelihood of improved PFS, followed by nivolumab + cabozantinib (79%), and nivolumab + ipilimumab + cabozantinib (77%). Notably, compared to nivolumab + cabozantinib, adding ipilimumab to nivolumab + cabozantinib did not improve PFS (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.72–1.43). Regarding ORRs, treatment ranking analysis also revealed that pembrolizumab + lenvatinib had the highest likelihood of providing better ORRs (99.7%). The likelihoods of improved PFS and ORRs of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib were true in both International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. Conclusions: Our analyses confirmed the robust efficacy of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib as first‐line treatment for patients with intermediate or poor IMDC risk mRCC. Triplet therapy did not result in superior efficacy. Considering both toxicity and the lack of mature overall survival data, triplet therapy should only be considered in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cabozantinib, a new first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), targets essential tyrosine kinases and outperforms the established comparator (sunitinib) in various efficacy outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib compared to other aRCC treatments. Methods: Following PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines, our protocol was registered in PROSPERO. A systematic search, without date limits, was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and EMBASE until October 8, 2023. Data extraction encompassed study details, baseline information, and outcomes. Hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals were employed for each outcome, and a random-effects model was applied to account for expected heterogeneity. Results: Three studies, encompassing 967 patients, were included in our analysis. In terms of efficacy, the pooled rate for overall survival significantly favored cabozantinib. However, in subgroup analyses, cabozantinib was only statistically superior to everolimus. For progression-free survival and tumor objective response rate, cabozantinib outperformed both everolimus and sunitinib. In adverse events, compared to sunitinib, cabozantinib exhibited inferiority in nearly all evaluated aspects, except for nausea and stomatitis, which showed no difference between the two groups. Conversely, it demonstrated a comparable risk profile with everolimus across various side effects. Conclusion: Cabozantinib shows significant efficacy in extending overall survival, progression-free survival, and tumor objective response rate despite a potentially higher risk of adverse events compared to sunitinib. These findings support cabozantinib as a first-line therapy for aRCC, either as an initial treatment or after prior VEGFR-targeted therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prospective data on treatment after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are lacking. We conducted a phase II multicentre study on cabozantinib after ICI treatment in HCC. This is an investigator-initiated, single-arm, clinical trial involving academic centres in Hong Kong and Korea. Key eligibility criteria included diagnosis of HCC, refractoriness to prior ICI-based treatment, and Child-Pugh A liver function. A maximum of two prior lines of therapy were allowed. All patients were commenced on cabozantinib at 60 mg/day. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Forty-seven patients were recruited from Oct 2020 to May 2022; 27 and 20 patients had received one and two prior therapies, respectively. Median follow-up was 11.2 months. The median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 3.3-5.3). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months (95% CI 7.3-14.4), and the 1-year OS rate was 45.3%. Partial response and stable disease occurred in 3 (6.4%) and 36 (76.6%) patients, respectively. When used as a second-line treatment (n = 27), cabozantinib was associated with a median PFS and OS of 4.3 (95% CI 3.3-6.7) and 14.3 (95% CI 8.9-NR) months, respectively. The corresponding median PFS and OS were 4.3 (95% CI 3.3-11.0) and 14.3 (95% CI 9.0-NR) months, respectively, for those receiving ICI-based regimens with proven benefits (n = 17). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia (6.4%). The median dose of cabozantinib was 40 mg/day. The number of prior therapies was an independent prognosticator (one vs. two; hazard ratio = 0.37; p = 0.03). Cabozantinib demonstrated efficacy in patients who had received prior ICI regimens; survival data for second-line cabozantinib following first-line ICI regimens provide a reference for future clinical trial design. The number of prior lines of treatment may be considered a stratification factor in randomised studies. Prospective data on systemic treatment following prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are lacking. This phase II clinical trial provides efficacy and safety data on cabozantinib in patients who had received prior ICI-based treatment. Exploratory analyses showed that the performance of cabozantinib differed significantly when used as a second- or third-line treatment. The above data could be used as a reference for clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials on subsequent treatment lines following ICIs. NCT04588051. [Display omitted] • This phase II clinical trial evaluated the use of cabozantinib after prior use of immunotherapy regimens in hepatocellular carcinoma. • The median progression-free and overall survival associated with cabozantinib were 4.1 and 9.9 months, respectively. • When used as second-line therapy, the median and progression-free and overall survival were 4.3 and 14.3 months, respectively. • In multivariable analyses, prior number of treatment lines (one vs. two) was an independent prognosticator for overall survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with advanced or metastatic non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma, cabozantinib plus nivolumab demonstrated promising efficacy, with an objective response rate of 48%, and potential for sustained responses, with a median duration of response of 17 mo. The toxicity profile was as expected for the two agents. Treatment options are limited for patients with non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). Patients with nccRCC experienced a favorable objective response rate (ORR) in a phase 2 trial of cabozantinib plus nivolumab. We now report updated efficacy and safety results at median follow-up of 34 mo for patients with papillary, unclassified, or translocation-associated RCC. Cabozantinib and nivolumab were administered at standard doses to patients with metastatic nccRCC that had progressed on zero or one line of systemic therapy. The primary endpoint was the ORR according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Forty patients were treated. At median follow-up of 34 mo for survivors, the ORR was 48% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31.5–63.9%). Median PFS was 13 mo (95% CI 7–16); the 12-mo and 24-mo PFS rates were 51% (95% CI 34–65%) and 23% (95% CI 11–37%), respectively. Median OS was 28 mo (95% CI 23–43); the 18-mo and 36-mo OS rates were 70% (95% CI 53–82%) and 44% (95% CI 28–60%), respectively. No new safety signals were seen with cabozantinib and nivolumab. This extended follow-up analysis demonstrates promising efficacy, and highlights the potential for sustained responses with cabozantinib plus nivolumab in patients with metastatic nccRCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: The prognostic impact of the administration of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced cancer has recently been documented. However, how these drugs affect the outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 128 patients with RCC who received first-line ICI combination therapy. The patients were grouped according to their history of antibiotics and PPIs use one month before the initiation of ICI combination therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) after ICI combination therapy were compared between patients treated with and without antibiotics or PPIs. Results: Of the 128 patients, 30 (23%) and 44 (34%) received antibiotics and PPIs, respectively. Patients treated with antibiotics exhibited shorter PFS and OS compared to those who did not receive antibiotics (median PFS: 4.9 vs. 16.1 months, p<0.0001; OS: 20.8 vs. 49.0 months, p=0.0034). Multivariate analyses showed that antibiotic administration was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (hazard ratio: 2.54: p=0.0002) and OS (hazard ratio: 2.56: p=0.0067) after adjusting for other covariates. In contrast, there were no significant differences in either PFS or OS between patients who received PPIs and those who did not. (PFS: p=0.828; OS: p=0.105). Conclusion: Antibiotics administration before ICI combination therapy was negatively associated with outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC. Therefore, careful monitoring is required for potentially high-risk patients undergoing ICI combination therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the world, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer. More than half of the HCC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and often require systemic therapy. Dysregulation of the activity of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is involved in the development and progress of HCC, RTKs are therefore the potential targets for systemic therapy of advanced HCC (aHCC). Currently, a total of six small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for aHCC, including first-line sorafenib, lenvatinib, and donafenib, and second-line regorafenib, cabozantinib, and apatinib. These TKIs improved patients survival, which are associated with disease stage, etiology, liver function, tumor burden, baseline levels of alpha-fetoprotein, and treatment history. This review focuses on the clinical outcomes of these TKIs in key clinical trials, retrospective and real-world studies and discusses the future perspectives of TKIs for aHCC, with an aim to provide up-to-date evidence for decision-making in the treatment of aHCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We evaluated efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab or cabozantinib alone in advanced NSCLC previously treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Methods: COSMIC-021 (NCT03170960) is a phase 1b, multicenter study in advanced solid tumors. This analysis included patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC without actionable genomic aberrations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, or BRAF-V600E who progressed on one prior ICI and less than or equal to two prior lines of systemic anticancer therapy. Patients received cabozantinib 40 mg orally/day plus atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously every three weeks (combination cohort) or cabozantinib 60 mg orally/day (single-agent cabozantinib cohort). Primary end point of the combination cohort was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 by investigator. Outcomes in the single-agent cabozantinib cohort were exploratory. Results: Eighty-one patients assigned to combination therapy and 31 assigned to single-agent cabozantinib received greater than or equal to one dose of study treatment. Median (range) follow-up was 26.1 months (12.1–44.2) and 22.4 months (1.5–29.0), respectively. Objective response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval: 11.7%–30.1%) in combination cohort and 6% (95% confidence interval: 0.8%–21.4%) in single-agent cabozantinib cohort. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 86% of patients in the combination cohort and 90% in the single-agent cabozantinib cohort; grade 3/4 TRAEs were 44% and 48%, respectively. There were two grade 5 TRAEs: pneumonitis (n = 1, combination) and gastric ulcer hemorrhage (n = 1, single-agent). Neither PD-L1 expression in tumor cells nor tumor mutation burden correlated with outcomes. Conclusions: Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab demonstrated modest clinical activity and manageable toxicity in advanced NSCLC after progression on prior ICI.

Concomitant direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (anti-VEGF TKI) have been associated with a higher risk of bleeding. Nevertheless, concomitant administration seems frequent in clinical practice in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis and appears to be safe according to the retrospective study by Boileve A. et al. But the risk of an additional pharmacokinetic interaction between anti-VEGF TKI and DOACs must be considered, in case of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibition by the TKI. We describe a case report with a major bleeding event in a renal metastatic cancer patient treated with cabozantinib and rivaroxaban. This case highlights the difficult therapeutic decision in a complex patient with cancer-associated thrombosis, who refused the anticoagulant subcutaneous route. Accumulation of bleeding risk factors (genito-urinary tumor localization) was additive to several pharmacodynamic interactions (acetylsalicylic acid, venlafaxine) and a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between cabozantinib and rivaroxaban. Indeed, cabozantinib-related P-glycoprotein inhibition could have led to a supratherapeutic level of rivaroxaban, contributing partly to the bleeding event. Before combining an anti-VEGF TKI and DOACs, a multidisciplinary pretherapeutic assessment seems crucial to evaluate the patient’s bleeding risk factors, pharmacodynamic interactions, and the risk of pharmacokinetic interactions mediated by P-gp. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The current possible treatments of advanced medullary carcinoma (MTC) include different drugs belonging to the class of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): vandetanib, cabozantinb, and selpercatinib. Although the effects of these TKIs have been well described in clinical trials, the real-practice evidence of the effectiveness and safety of these treatment is scant. This real-world case series aims to describe a niche of patients with advanced MTC treated with more than one TKI by focusing on treatment responses and any reported adverse events (AEs) and to provide additional insight on the individualized approach to the management of metastatic MTC. Methods: Five patients with a diagnosis of metastastic MTC, treated with at least two different molecules of TKIs, were retrospectively selected. Results: Three patients obtained a partial response (one with cabozantinb, one with selpercatinib, and one with vandetanib), and two patients obtained disease stability (both of them treated with all three TKIs, the first two lines discontinued for AEs). The AE profile agreed with the known clinical trials AEs except for non-neoplastic ascites related to selpercatinib and lung cavitations of non-neoplastic tissue related to cabozantinb. The latter was an AE never described so far in patients receiving TKIs. Conclusions: The best management of MTC relies on an individualized approach, keeping in mind and dealing with the potential toxicity in order to minimize the treatment withdrawal.

Background Metastatic RCC with sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid (S/R) dedifferentiation is an aggressive disease associated with improved response to immune checkpoint therapy (ICT). The outcomes of patients treated with VEGFR-targeted therapies (TT) following ICT progression have not been investigated. Patients and Methods Retrospective review of 57 patients with sarcomatoid (S), rhabdoid (R), or sarcomatoid plus rhabdoid (S + R) dedifferentiation who received any TT after progression on ICT at an academic cancer center. Clinical endpoints of interest included time on TT, overall survival (OS) from initiation of TT, and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST version 1.1. Multivariable models adjusted for epithelial histology, IMDC risk, prior VEGFR TT, and inclusion of cabozantinib in the post-ICT TT regimen. Results 29/57 patients had S dedifferentiation and 19 had R dedifferentiation. The most frequently used TT was cabozantinib (43.9%) followed by selective VEGFR TT (22.8%). The median time on TT was 6.4 months for all, 6.1 months for those with S dedifferentiation, 15.6 months for R dedifferentiation, and 6.1 months for S + R dedifferentiation. Median OS from initiation of TT was 24.9 months for the entire cohort, and the ORR was 20.0%. Patients with R dedifferentiation had significantly longer time on TT than those with S dedifferentiation (HR 0.44, 95% CI, 0.21-0.94). IMDC risk was associated with OS. Conclusions A subset of patients with S/R dedifferentiation derive clinical benefit from TT after they have progressive disease on ICT. Patients with R dedifferentiation appeared to derive more benefit from TT than those with S dedifferentiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To provide a more comprehensive understanding of the efficacy and safety profile of cabozantinib versus placebo in malignant tumors, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. This involved analyzing a collection of published randomized controlled trials to assess the outcomes. We used RevMan5.3 software to evaluate the outcomes of the collected studies. The primary outcome we focused on was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease control rate (DCR). Our findings revealed that compared to placebo, cabozantinib significantly extended the PFS of patients [hazard ratios (HR) 0.37, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.32, 0.43, p < 0.00001]. Additionally, cabozantinib improved the OS of patients [HR 0.78, 95%CI: 0.68, 0.91, p = 0.002]. While it is important to note that cabozantinib was associated with a higher likelihood of causing digestive, cutaneous, and cardiovascular related adverse events [relative risk (RR) 4.40, 95% CI: 3.10, 6.25, p < 0.00001]. Based on our analysis, cabozantinib significantly prolonged the PFS and OS of patients with malignant tumors (p < 0.01). We recommend the use of cabozantinib in treating advanced malignant tumors. However, it is important to continuously monitor and manage the drug-related adverse events. PROSPERO (No. CRD42023449261). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Cabozantinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has brought a new therapeutic effect for the medical treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Objectives: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and single-arm trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus ICIs in RCC. Methods: We extracted data from PubMed, Cochrane, Medline and Embase databases, and rated literature quality through Cochrane risk of bias tool and MINORS. RevMan5.3 software was used to analyze the results of randomized controlled trials and single-arm trials. Results: A total of 7 studies were included. Treatment with cabozantinib plus ICIs improved PFS [HR 0.75, (95%CI: 0.52, 1.08), p = 0.12] and the OS [HR 0.80, (95%CI: 0.60, 1.07), p = 0.13] in randomized controlled trials. Meanwhile, the result of the ORR inrandomized controlled trialswas [risk ratio (RR) 1.37, (95%CI: 1.21, 1.54), p < 0.00001] and in single-arm trials was [risk difference (RD) 0.49, (95%CI: 0.26, 0.71), p < 0.0001]. Conclusion: Cabozantinib plus ICIs prolonged the PFS and OS, and improved ORR in patients with RCC. Our recommendation is to use cabozantinib plus ICIs to treat advanced RCC, and to continuous monitor and manage the drug-related adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cabozantinib plus nivolumab was approved as a first-line (1L) treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) following the CheckMate 9ER trial. CaboCombo (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05361434) is a non-interventional study designed to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in a real-world setting. Overall, 311 patients with clear-cell aRCC receiving 1L cabozantinib plus nivolumab will be recruited from at least 70 centers in seven countries worldwide. The primary end point is overall survival at 18 months. Secondary end points include progression-free survival, objective response rate, safety, patterns of treatment, subsequent anticancer therapies and quality of life. CaboCombo will provide real-world evidence on the characteristics, treatment sequences, and outcomes of patients with aRCC receiving 1L cabozantinib plus nivolumab. Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are cancers that grow in the kidneys. Clear-cell RCC is the most common type reported in almost three quarters of patients. RCC tumors become advanced if they grow and spread to other parts of the body. In a clinical trial called CheckMate 9ER, a combination of two drugs called cabozantinib and nivolumab improved survival compared with a drug called sunitinib in patients with advanced clear-cell RCC who had not received any previous treatments. In CheckMate 9ER, cabozantinib plus nivolumab also reduced the size and slowed the spread of tumors compared with sunitinib. However, clinical trials only allow certain patients to participate under strict treatment conditions and so do not provide information on how a treatment will work in all patients. Researchers therefore carry out additional studies to gather extra information from real-world clinical practice. CaboCombo is a study that will look at how well cabozantinib plus nivolumab stops tumors from growing and spreading, the side effects of the drugs, and also how the drugs are used by doctors. It is an observational study, which means that researchers will observe all patients and doctors using the treatment but they will not intervene. The aim of the study is to gather information that will help doctors make treatment decisions for their patients. This article describes how the CaboCombo study will be carried out and the information it will give the researchers. The results will help physicians make decisions on the best treatment option for patients. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT05361434 (ClinicalTrials.gov) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Sequential therapies are essential to extend overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several second‐line treatments with molecular target agents have shown survival benefits. However, the significance of post‐progression survival (PPS) in extending OS in patients with HCC given such treatments remains uncertain. Methods: Through a systematic review of the literature in the PubMed database, this study investigated the correlation between PPS and OS and that between progression‐free survival (PFS) and OS in patients with HCC given second‐line treatments. Results: In total, 3935 patients who had received second‐line treatment with regorafenib, ramucirumab, or cabozantinib, which are approved molecular target agents, were identified. In the patients treated with regorafenib, PPS showed a strong correlation with OS (R2 = 0.729, R = 0.854, p < 0.001) whereas PFS showed a weak correlation (R2 = 0.218, R = 0.467, p = 0.021). In the patients treated with ramucirumab, PPS showed a strong correlation with OS (R2 = 0.800, R = 0.894, p = 0.016) whereas PFS showed a negligible correlation (R2 = 0.020, R = 0.140, p = 0.791). In the patients treated with cabozantinib, PPS showed a strong correlation with OS (R2 = 0.856, R = 0.925, p = 0.003) as did PFS (R2 = 0.946, R = 0.973, p < 0.001). Conclusions: PPS plays a more significant role than PFS in extending OS in patients given second‐line treatment for unresectable HCC. Sequential therapies after disease progression in second‐line treatment are essential to acquire good OS. Maintenance of hepatic reserve function and the patient's general condition is essential during systemic treatments for unresectable HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are few comparative studies on dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (i.e., IO-IO) and combination therapies comprising ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (i.e., IO-TKI) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially in real-world settings. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of 175 patients with IMDC intermediate-risk or poor-risk RCC; as first-line therapy, 103 received IO-IO, and 72 received IO-TKI. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to balance patients' backgrounds in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups. Results: Based on the IPTW analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (median: 15.6 vs. 8.3 months; p = 0.0386). In contrast, overall survival was not different between groups (median: 46.7 vs. 49.0 months; p = 0.465). Although the IPTW-adjusted objective response rate was not significantly different (51.2% vs. 43.9%; p = 0.359), the progressive disease rate as the best overall response was lower in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (3.3% vs. 27.4%; p < 0.0001). Regarding the safety profile, the treatment interruption rate was higher in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (70.3% vs. 49.2%; p = 0.005). In contrast, the IO-IO group had a higher corticosteroid administration rate (43.3% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.001). Conclusion: IO-TKI therapy exhibited superior effectiveness over IO-IO therapy in terms of PFS improvement and immediate disease progression prevention and was associated with a higher risk of treatment interruption and a lower risk of needing corticosteroids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]