1. Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants
- Author
-
Derek J. Sullivan, F. Falkiner, C.T. Keane, M.J. O’Donnell, C.M. Tuttlebee, David C. Coleman, and R.J. Russell
- Subjects
Microbiology (medical) ,Aerobic bacteria ,Colony Count, Microbial ,Guidelines as Topic ,Dental Equipment ,Hospitals, Special ,Peroxide ,Microbiology ,Toxicology ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Dental Staff ,Risk Factors ,Humans ,Medicine ,Organic Chemicals ,business.industry ,Infection Control, Dental ,Biofilm ,Dental Disinfectants ,General Medicine ,Contamination ,Peroxides ,Disinfection ,Infectious Diseases ,chemistry ,Biofilms ,Dentistry ,Equipment Contamination ,Dental chair ,Water quality ,Water Microbiology ,business ,Ireland - Abstract
Bacterial biofilm in dental unit waterlines (DUWs) is a widespread problem, and poses a potentially significant risk of infection to dental staff and patients, particularly those who are medically compromised or immunocompromised. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the level of bacterial contamination of dental chair unit output water in the Dublin Dental Hospital, and to investigate the efficacy of two hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectants in reducing bacterial loads to ≤200cfu/mL as recommended by the American Dental Association. The chemical quality of dental chair unit input and output water was well within the limits recommended for potable water. Water supplied to the units yielded an average aerobic heterotrophic bacterial cell density of 184cfu/mL. However, the corresponding density in output water was considerably higher; the average cell density in water from the three-in-one air/water syringes and cup fillers in 12 chairs was 8200 and 4300cfu/mL, respectively. Dental unit water obtained from 18 separate reservoir-supplied units in general practices in the Dublin area yielded an average of 66000cfu/mL. The bacterial species found were predominantly environmental organisms, which were also present at low levels in the input water. Some of the species identified (e.g., Burkholderia cepacia and Pseudomonas fluorescens ) are known opportunistic pathogens. The capacity of two disinfectants, Sterilex Ultra and Sanosil, to reduce bacterial contamination to safe levels was compared. In a controlled study, once weekly overnight (15h) disinfection using either agent reduced the bacterial density to below the American Dental Association recommended level of 200cfu/mL. However, once disinfection ceased the bacterial loads increased to unacceptably high levels within three weeks. Electron microscopic analysis showed that both disinfectants markedly reduced biofilm in the DUWs, but the biofilm rapidly became extensive again when once weekly disinfection ceased. While both disinfectants were equally effective in lowering the bacterial counts to acceptable levels, Sterilex Ultra was associated with clogging of DUWs in some dental chair units after repeated usage, suggesting that Sanosil is a more suitable agent for routine use.
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF