Bufo (Anaxyrus) williamsi. sp. nov. DIXIE VALLEY TOAD (FIG. 2b, FIG.4) Holotype. CAS 259271 (CALIfORNIA AcADEMY Of ScIENcE HERPETOLOGY COLLEcTION), ADULT MALE (FIG. 4, TAbLE 1), DIXIE VALLEY, CHURcHILL COUNTY, NEVADA, UNITED STATES (39��47'39.02"N, 118�� 3'32.08"W), ON 3 JUNE 2015 bY M. R. GORDON, K. NIcHOLSON, C. MO AND C. GIbSON. Paratypes. UNR 7918, ADULT MALE; UNR 7919, ADULT fEMALE; UNR 7920, SUbADULT; UNR 7921, ADULT MALE; UNR 7922, ADULT fEMALE; UNR 7923, SUbADULT; UNR 7924, ADULT MALE. SAME LOcALITY, cOLLEcTION DATE, AND cOLLEcTORS AS HOLOTYPE. Diagnosis. Bufo ( Anaxyrus) williamsi IS DISTINGUISHAbLE fROM B. boreas bY A cOMbINATION Of DIAGNOSTIc MORPHOLOGIcAL cHARAcTERS (FIG. 4; TAbLE 1, TAbLE 2), GENETIc EVIDENcE (FIG.3, FIG. 6), AND LOcALIZED DISTRIbUTION (FIG. 2b). Bufo (Anaxyrus) williamsi IS DISTINcT fROM B. boreas bY: A SMALL ADULT bODY SIZE (SVL IS MORE THAN 2.5 cM SMALLER THAN B. boreas; TAbLE 1); SIGNIfIcANTLY, bUT MODESTLY, LARGER, cLOSELY-SET EYES, AND SMALLER HEAD (TAbLE 2); STATISTIcALLY AND PERcEPTIbLY LARGER TYMPANUM, AND SHORTER HIND LIMbS; cONSPIcUOUSLY LARGE AND ELEVATED TIbIAL GLANDS; AND DISTINcTIVE cOLOR PATTERN (FIG. 4A, FIG. 4b). smaller or larger (���) states exhibited by congeneric species when compared to B. williamsi. Bufo ( Anaxyrus) williamsi IS THE SMALLEST bUfONID WITHIN THE B. boreas SPEcIES cOMPLEX (TAbLE 1, TAbLE 2). THIS NEW SPEcIES HAS A STATISTIcALLY, bUT MODESTLY SHORT, NARROW HEAD SIMILAR TO THE SMALL SIZED B. exsul, bUT B. williamsi cAN bE DISTINGUISHED fROM B. exsul bY A SIGNIfIcANTLY, bUT MODESTLY, LONGER RELATIVE SNOUT LENGTH cOMPARAbLE TO THAT B. boreas AND B. nelsoni (TAbLE 2). Bufo ( Anaxyrus) williamsi HAS RELATIVELY LARGE, cLOSELY SET EYES AND PERcEPTIVELY LARGE TYMPANUM, WHIcH DISTINGUISHES THIS TOAD fROM ALL TAXA WITHIN THE B. boreas SPEcIES cOMPLEX. THE PAROTOID GLANDS ARE SLIGHTLY LONGER THAN WIDE, bUT ARE cOMPARATIVELY SHORTER OVERALL THAN PAROTOIDS Of B. boreas (TAbLE 2 ). Bufo (Anaxyrus) williamsi HAS HIND LEGS THAT ARE SIMILAR IN RELATIVE SIZE TO B. exsul, bUT SIGNIfIcANTLY AND PERcEPTIbLY SHORTER THAN THOSE Of B. boreas AND B. nelsoni. THE TIbIAL GLANDS EXHIbITED IN B. williamsi ARE cONSPIcUOUS AND APPROXIMATELY THE WIDTH Of THE PAROTOID GLANDS, REGULAR IN SHAPE AND RUST cOLORED WITH LITTLE VARIATION AMONG INDIVIDUALS Of THIS SPEcIES. IN ADDITION TO MORPHOLOGIcAL SHAPE DIffERENcES, B. williamsi EXHIbITS UNIQUE cOLORATION DIffERENT fROM TAXA Of THE B. boreas SPEcIES cOMPLEX. THE DORSAL GROUND cOLOR cONSISTS Of OLIVE SHADES THAT cONTAIN MINUTE bLAck fLEckS, RUST cOLORED WARTS ARE bORDERED bY fINE, bLAck HALOS, AND PROMINENT PAROTOID GLANDS ARE PALE TAN AND bLAck SPEckED. THE VENTER Of B. williamsi IS SIMILAR TO B. exsul, EXHIbITING SHARPLY cONTRASTED bLAck MARbLING AGAINST A WHITE bAckGROUND cOLOR ON THE ANTERIOR SIDES Of THE LIMbS AND bELLY. THE PRESENcE Of A DORSAL STRIPE IS VARIAbLE AMONG INDIVIDUALS Of B. williamsi, AS IS SIMILAR TO THE OTHER MEMbERS Of THE B. boreas cOMPLEX, WITH THE EXcEPTION Of B. exsul. DISTINcT NUPTIAL PADS DEVELOP ON THE DORSAL SIDE Of THE THUMb IN MALES Of B. williamsi, A TYPIcAL SEcONDARY SEXUAL cHARAcTERISTIc EXHIbITED AMONG MOST bUfONIDS. THIS SPEcIES LAckS AN ADVERTISEMENT cALL, bUT RETAINS A RELEASE cALL THAT SOUNDS LIkE THE WEEPING Of A cHIck (STEbbINS 2003). THE cALL IS EMITTED WHEN MALES cOME INTO cONTAcT WITH ONE ANOTHER, SIMILAR TO cONGENERS Of THE B. boreas cOMPLEX. Description of holotype. BODY SMALL (SVL = 52.92 MM), RObUST; HEAD NEARLY LONG (17.45 MM) AS WIDE (18.35 MM; 95 % HEAD LENGTH TO HEAD WIDTH). DORSAL OUTLINE Of SNOUT IS MODERATELY TRUNcATE; SNOUT LONG IN LATERAL VIEW (6.61 MM; 1.3 TIMES LONGER THAN EYE DIAMETER). CANTHUS ROSTRALIS DISTINcT, SLIGHTLY cONcAVE AND AbRUPT AT NARES, SLOPING UP TO ANTERIOR MARGIN Of ORbITS. LOREAL REGION MODERATELY cONcAVE. NOSTRILS PROTUbERANT, DIREcTED DORSOLATERALLY AND cLOSER TO ANTERIOR cORNER Of EYE THAN END Of SNOUT. INTERNARIAL DISTANcE 75% Of EYE-TO-NARIS DISTANcE. EYES LARGE (4.94 MM), cLOSE SPAcED (3.83 MM); INTERORbITAL DISTANcE 75% Of EYE DIAMETER. EYES PROMINENT, bREAcHING SNOUT PROfILE IN DORSAL VIEW. TYMPANUM DISTINcT, OVOID, RELATIVELY LARGE (2.89 MM; 58% Of EYE DIAMETER). SUPRATYMPANIc fOLD PRESENT. PAROTOID GLANDS SUb-ELLIPTIcAL, TAPERED AT POSTERIOR MARGIN Of EYE, LONGER (5.56 MM) THAN WIDE (3.90 MM; 77%). PAROTOIDS ELEVATED DORSALLY, SLIGHTLY DIVERGENT AND SEPARATED (9.18 MM); GLAND WIDTH SMALLER THAN EYE DIAMETER (75%). FOREARMS RObUST. FINGERS UNWEbbED; RELATIVE LENGTHS III> VI> I> II; NUPTIAL PADS PRESENT, RAISED ON DORSAL SIDE Of DIGIT I; TIPS ROUNDED, SUbARTIcULAR TUbERcLES MODERATE, ROUND; AccESSORY PALMAR TUbERcLES SMALL AND ROUND. THENAR TUbERcLE RAISED, PROMINENT, AND ROUND. PALMAR TUbERcLE IS DISTINcT, LARGE, SUbOVOID, SEPARATED fROM MEDIAL MARGIN Of LESSER THENAR TUbERcLE. HIND LIMbS SHORT (FML =19.54 MM; TBL =18.75 MM; FTL =33.10 MM), RObUST; fEMUR SLIGHTLY LONGER THAN TIbIA. TARSAL fOLD PRESENT. HIND fEET WEbbED PROXIMALLY. RELATIVE TOE LENGTHS IV> III> V> II> I; TIPS ROUNDED. SUbARTIcULAR TUbERcLES MODERATE, SMALL, ROUND; PLANTAR TUbERcLES SMALL, NUMEROUS. INNER METATARSAL TUbERcLE PRONOUNcED, ELEVATED, AND ELLIPTIcAL. OUTER METATARSAL TUbERcLE SMALLER THAN INNER METATARSAL TUbERcLE, cONSPIcUOUS, OVOID. LONGITUDINALLY ALONG DORSUM, DORSAL STRIPE bROkEN, WEAkLY PRESENT, ORIGINATING POSTERIOR TO INTERORbITAL SPAcE AND TERMINATING AT SAcRAL HUMP; IRREGULAR, ELEVATED, ScATTERED TUbERcLES PRESENT, INcREASING IN SIZE fROM INTERORbITAL SPAcE TO POSTERIOR MARGIN Of UROSTYLE. SkIN bETWEEN TUbERcLES NEARLY SMOOTH; fOREARMS SMOOTH; HIND LEG TUbERcLES VARY IN SIZE. TIbIAL GLANDS PRESENT ON DORSAL SURfAcE Of LEGS, PROMINENT, EQUIVALENT TO THE WIDTH Of PAROTOID GLAND. SMALL DENSELY cONcENTRATED TUbERcLES PRESENT, ORIGINATING POSTERIOR TO LAbIAL cOMMISSURE, INfERIOR TO TYMPANUM, TERMINATING IN AXILLARY REGION. SMALL, DENSELY cONcENTRATED TUbERcLES PRESENT LONGITUDINALLY ALONG MID AXILLARY LINE, TERMINATING AT ARTIcULATION Of fEMUR. VENTER GRANULAR; SEAT PATcH DARk, cONSPIcUOUS. Color in life. DORSAL GROUND cOLOR Of THE HOLOTYPE IS cOMPLEX, WITH cHROMATIc HUES Of OLIVE WITH SMALL, DIVERSE AND IRREGULAR bLAck fLEckS, (FIG. 4A). FAcE HEAVILY SPEckED. UPPER EYELIDS fLEckED bLAck AGAINST OLIVE bAckGROUND cOLOR. PUPIL bLAck, HORIZONTAL, WITH GOLD-STREAkED IRIS. PAROTOID GLANDS TAN; MINOR bLAck SPOTTING ON cROWN Of GLAND WITH bLAck STREAkS ALONG MARGINS. SMALL, DENSE TUbERcLES OccUR bETWEEN LAbIAL cOMMISSURE AND AXILLARY REGION AND ARE RUST cOLORED. RUST cOLORED TUbERcLES IRREGULARLY DISTRIbUTED AcROSS DORSUM, SMALL bUT VARIAbLE IN SIZE, WITH bLAck MARGINS. TUbERcLES bETWEEN MID-AXILLARY LINE AND ARTIcULATION WITH fEMUR RUST cOLORED, bORDERED bY fINE bLAck HALOS. DORSAL STRIPE cREAM, ORIGINATING AT INTERORbITAL SPAcE, bROkEN jUST POSTERIOR TO TERMINAL MARGIN Of PAROTOID GLANDS, RESUMES ALONG VERTEbRAL REGION, AND TERMINATES AT SAcRAL HUMP. FOREARMS WITH bLAck fLEckS DORSALLY AND MEDIUM TO DARk bROWN OVERLYING OLIVE bAckGROUND. HIND LEGS WITH RUSTY TUbERcLES ARRANGED ATOP DARk bROWN bANDING OVERLYING GROUND OLIVE cOLOR WITH bLAck fLEckING. INfERIOR TO MIDAXILLARY LINE, TUbERcLES DIMINISH IN SIZE UNTIL AbSENT. INfERIOR MID-AXILLARY LINE WITH HEAVY bLAck MOTTLING AGAINST WHITE. SMALL bLAck SPOTS ALONG INfERIOR LOWER LAbIAL MARGIN. ANTERIOR fOREARMS AND HIND LEGS HEAVILY MARbLED bLAck AGAINST THE WHITE bAckGROUND cOLOR. THROAT WHITE, IMMAcULATE. WHITE VENTER HEAVILY MOTTLED IN bLAck; SEAT PATcH cONSPIcUOUS AND DARk bROWN, WITH ROUND, WHITE SPOTTING (FIG. 4b). UNDERSIDES Of HANDS AND fEET DARk GRAY. TUbERcLES Of HANDS AND fEET, fINGERS, AND TOES bRIGHT ORANGE. Color in preservative. COLOR IS NOTAbLY DIffERENT AND MUTED (FIG. 4c, FIG. 4D) RELATIVE TO LIfE (FIG. 4A, FIG. 4b). DISTINcTIVE DIffERENcES INcLUDE NEARLY MONOTONE GROUND cOLOR WHIcH IS DARk GREENISH GRAY, WARTS TO DARk bROWN, DORSAL STRIPE fAINT. PAROTOID GLANDS PALE bROWN AND cONSPIcUOUS, STREAkED, AND SPOTTED A MUTED bLAck cOLOR. IN PRESERVATIVE, THE bRIGHT cOLORATION Of THE SPINOSE TUbERcLES INfERIOR TO TYMPANUM AND TUbERcLES Of HANDS AND fEET fADE TO WHITE. BLAck MOTTLE ON THE VENTER AND LIMbS APPEARS DULLER THAN IN LIfE. TUbERcLES ON fEET AND HANDS ARE WHITE WITH bROWN TIPS. Morphological results. RESULTS Of STATISTIcAL ANALYSES WERE cONSISTENT fOR bOTH LOG-TRANSfORMED DATA, AND fOR USING REGRESSION Of SVL AGAINST THE MORPHOLOGIcAL VARIAbLES. BOTH ANALYSES DETEcTED SIGNIfIcANT DIffERENcES fOR ALL 14 MORPHOLOGIcAL cHARAcTERS EVALUATED AT THE SPEcIES LEVEL AMONG B. boreas, B. nelsoni, B. exsul, AND B. williamsi (TAbLE 1, TAbLE 2 ). Bufo ( Anaxyrus) williamsi IS THE SMALLEST Of THIS GROUP (F 3, 376 = 77.9, p F 3, 376 = 63.4, p F 4, 379 = 903.8, p F 4, 379 = 830.8, p F 4, 379 =1219.0, p F 4, 379 = 1080.1, p F 4, 379 = 164.9, p F 4, 379 =160.9, p B. williamsi DIffERED SIGNIfIcANTLY fROM B. exsul bY HAVING A RELATIVELY LONGER SNOUT MORE LIkE LARGER SPEcIES B. boreas AND B. nelsoni, A SIMILARITY DETEcTED IN THE LEAST SQUARES MEANS GENERATED fROM THE MANCOVA ANALYSES AND cORRESPONDING LINEAR REGRESSION THAT NORMALIZE SVL AGAINST THIS cHARAcTER (TAbLE 2). Bufo ( Anaxyrus) williamsi HAS RELATIVELY LARGE EYES (F 4, 379 = 259.9, p F 4, 379 = 240.0, p F 4, 379 = 422.5, p F 4, 379 = 371.1, p B. boreas, AND A LARGER TYMPANUM cOMPARED TO ALL THREE OTHER SPEcIES EXAMINED (F 4, 379 = 231.4, p B. williamsi IS SIMILAR TO B. boreas, THE cOMPARATIVE LENGTH Of THE PAROTOID IS SHORTER (TAbLE 2). ADDITIONALLY, THE cHARAcTERS THAT DEfINE THE LENGTH Of THE LEG Of B. williamsi ARE SHORT (FL: F 4, 379 = 910.4, p F 4, 379 = 801.0, p F 4, 379 = 1063.8, p F 4, 379 = 909.0, p F 4, 379 = 571.8, p F 4, 379 = 470.7, p B. boreas (TUkEY HSD POST-HOc PAIRWISE cOMPARISONS, p B. williamsi IS THE SMALLEST TOAD AMONG ALL POPULATIONS EXAMINED (F 16, 379 = 34.7, p F 17,379 = 285.1, p F 17,379 = 353.3, p F 17,379 = 55.1, p B. boreas AND cONGENERIc TAXA EXAMINED (F 17,379 = 86.07, p B. williamsi ARE RELATIVELY SHORTER IN LENGTH (F 17, 379 = 81.1, p B. boreas. HOWEVER, THE SIZE Of THE PAROTOIDS AND INTERNARIAL DISTANcE (IND) WERE AMONG THOSE TRAITS THAT WERE SIMILAR IN RELATIVE SIZES TO B. boreas, B exsul, and B. nelsoni. ON THE OTHER HAND, THE TYMPANIc DIAMETER IS RELATIVELY LARGE (F 17, 379 = 82.4, p B. williamsi, AND ITS LEGS ARE THE SHORTEST AMONG ALL POPULATIONS SAMPLED (FL: F 17, 379 = 248.9, p F 17, 379 = 312.6, p F 17, 379 = 139.1, p B. exsul. DIScRIMINANT fUNcTION ANALYSIS (DFA) ILLUSTRATES SIGNIfIcANT MORPHOLOGIcAL DIffERENcES AMONG SPEcIES (F 42, 173 = 2.80, p B. boreas, B. nelsoni AND B. exsul (FIG. 5). THE MORPHOLOGIcAL cHARAcTERS WERE AccURATE PREDIcTORS Of B. williamsi IN ALL THIRTY PREDIcTIONS. THE fIRST cANONIcAL AXIS EXPLAINED 60% Of THE VARIATION IN THE DFA WITH TIbIAL LENGTH LOADING MOST HEAVILY, WHILE THE SEcOND cANONIcAL AXIS AccOUNTED fOR 24 % Of THE VARIATION WITH HEAD WIDTH LOADING MORE HEAVILY THAN OTHER cHARAcTERS. THERE WAS NO SEXUAL DIMORPHISM DETEcTED IN SVL Of B. williamsi (F 1, 28 = 0.09, p > 0.05). HOWEVER, MALES EXHIbITED 3 % LARGER EYES (F 2 , 29 = 4.9, p F 2 , 29 = 12.2, p Genetic Results. THE cOMbINED DNA ANALYSES Of THE cONTROL REGION SUPPORT THE DIffERENTIATION Of THE NEW SPEcIES, B. williamsi (FIG.3, FIG. 6). THREE MAjOR GEOGRAPHIc cLADES WERE IDENTIfIED AS OREGON-NW NEVADA (ONV), HUMbOLDT-LAHONTAN (HL) AND MOjAVE (M) AND GENETIc RELATIONSHIPS ARE ILLUSTRATED IN THE B. boreas TCS HAPLOTYPE NETWORk (FIG. 1b, FIG. 3 ), cONfIRMING THE DIffERENTIATION Of B. williamsi fROM NEIGHbORING POPULATIONS Of B. boreas IDENTIfIED UNDER THE HL cLADE AND NORTHERN POPULATIONS Of B. canorus. THE TCS NETWORk HIGHLIGHTS THE fAcT THAT B. boreas fROM NORTHERN NEVADA ARE LESS DIVERGENT fROM EAcH OTHER, A RESULT cOMMON WITHIN THE cLADES IDENTIfIED HERE, bUT ILLUSTRATES THAT EAcH ARE DIScONNEcTED fROM EAcH OTHER, SUPPORTING THE STRONG GEOGRAPHIc SIGNAL WITHIN THE GREAT BASIN (FIG. 1b, FIG. 3, FIG. 6). Of THE THREE, THE SOUTHERN cLADE (M) IS MORE DIVERSE, WHIcH INcLUDES HAPLOTYPES Of B. boreas, THE LOcALIZED ENDEMIc, B. nelsoni, AND SOUTHERN POPULATIONS Of B. canorus (FIG. 1b, FIG. 3). THIS PATTERN IS A cONSISTENT RESULT Of PREVIOUS STUDIES (STEPHENS 2001; GOEbEL et al. 2009). THERE ARE MINOR DIffERENcES IN THE TOPOLOGIES Of OUR PHYLOGENETIc ANALYSES, YET THE DIffERENTIATION Of B. williamsi AS A UNIQUE AND SISTER LINEAGE TO bOTH THE HL GROUP Of B. boreas AND NORTHERN B. canorus IS A cONSISTENT RESULT (FIG. 6). PAIRWISE cOMPARISONS Of NUcLEOTIDE DIVERSITY REVEALED THAT B. williamsi IS cOMPARAbLY DIffERENTIATED AS ARE OTHER SPEcIES IN THE boreas SPEcIES cOMPLEX WITH AN AVERAGE GENETIc DISTANcE Of 2.1 %, INDIcATING REcENT DIVERGENcE fROM B. boreas, A cONSISTENT RESULT fROM PREVIOUS STUDIES EXAMINING boreas DIVERSITY WITHIN THE SPEcIES cOMPLEX (GRAYbEAL 1993; SHAffER et al. 2000; STEPHENS 2001; PAULY et al. 2004; GOEbEL et al. 2009; TAbLE 3). Etymology. THE SPEcIfIc EPITHET IS IN TRIbUTE TO RObERT WILLIAMS, fORMER FIELD SUPERVISOR Of THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIfE, WHOSE HERcULEAN EffORTS ON bEHALf Of THE fAUNA Of NEVADA AND CALIfORNIA WERE cRITIcALLY IMPORTANT IN DIScOVERING ADDITIONAL bIODIVERSITY Of ANURANS IN THE GREAT BASIN, AND IN fOcUSING ON THE NEEDS TO PROVIDE PROTEcTION TO THE RARE AND IMPERILED fAUNA, AND THE EcOSYSTEMS UPON WHIcH THEY DEPEND, IN NEVADA AND CALIfORNIA. THE DIXIE VALLEY TOAD WOULD NOT HAVE bEEN DIScOVERED WITHOUT THE EffORTS Of THIS cOURAGEOUS PUbLIc SERVANT. Distribution. Bufo ( Anaxyrus) williamsi IS fOUND ONLY WITHIN WETLANDS Of LIMITED EXTENT fED fROM ARTESIAN SPRINGS ON THE WESTERN EDGE Of THE DIXIE VALLEY PLAYA, EAST Of THE STILLWATER RANGE IN DIXIE VALLEY, NV (FIG. 2b). VERY ISOLATED AND RESTRIcTED IN SIZE, THE ENTIRE ESTIMATED GEOGRAPHIc RANGE IS APPROXIMATELY 6 kM2, WITH NO USAbLE cORRIDORS TO OTHER TOAD HAbITAT OUTSIDE DIXIE VALLEY. FOUR SPRING DIScHARGE SITES AND THE MARSH HAbITAT DOWNSTREAM Of THE SPRINGS ARE SEPARATED fROM EAcH OTHER AND INTERRUPTED bY SAGEbRUSH STEPPE DOMINATED bY bIG SAGEbRUSH (Artemisia tridentata SSP. tridentata), GREASEWOOD (Sarcobatus vermiculatus), RUbbER RAbbITbRUSH (Ericameria nauseosa) AND SALTbUSH (Atriplex SPP.) (BLM 2011). THE SPRING-fED WETLANDS SUPPORT MARSH VEGETATION SUcH AS SPIkERUSH (Eleocharis SPP.), kNOTWEED (Polygonum SPP.), cANARYGRASS (Phalaris SPP.), DUckWEED (Lemna SP.), VARIOUS SPEcIES Of RUSH (Juncus SP.), cOMMON REED (Phragmites australis), AND cATTAIL (Typha SPP.) (BLM 2011), AND TOADS ARE TYPIcALLY fOUND IN SHALLOW WATER OR ASSOcIATED WITH MOIST SOILS WITHIN THE IMMEDIATE PERIMETER Of THE RIPARIAN AREAS THAT bORDER SAGEbRUSH HAbITAT. Natural history. Bufo ( Anaxyrus) williamsi IS RESTRIcTED TO THE SPRING fED-WETLAND HAbITAT ALONG THE WESTERN EDGE Of THE DIXIE VALLEY PLAYA. SIMILAR TO OTHER TOADS IN THE B. boreas cOMPLEX (EXcEPT PERHAPS B. exsul, WHIcH IS MORE AQUATIc), THE TERRESTRIAL B. williamsi IS TYPIcALLY NOcTURNAL, EMERGING AT DUSk, AND cAN bE fOUND IN MOIST VEGETATION OR IN VERY STILL, SHALLOW WATER WITH VERY LITTLE VEGETATION cANOPY. DIXIE VALLEY EXPERIENcES EXTREME TEMPERATURE fLUcTUATIONS bETWEEN DAY AND NIGHT TEMPERATURES, AS WELL AS SEASON-TO-SEASON EXTREMES, cHARAcTERISTIc Of cOLD DESERT EcOSYSTEMS. IN AUTUMN, IT IS LIkELY THAT B. williamsi RETREATS TO bURROWS TO HIbERNATE, EMERGING IN SPRING TO bREED. BREEDING OccURS fROM MARcH TO JUNE (FORREST et al. 2013). SEXUALLY MATURE MALES cONGREGATE IN SHALLOW WATER AROUND THE PERIMETER Of WETLAND VEGETATION. Bufo ( Anaxyrus) williamsi DOES NOT HAVE AN ADVERTISEMENT VOcALIZATION, bUT RETAINS A RELEASE cALL USED bY MALES WHEN IN cONTAcT WITH OTHER MALES. EGG MASSES AND TADPOLES DEVELOP IN STILL, SHALLOW WATER WITHIN THE MARGINS Of THE MARSH HAbITAT, WHERE THERE ARE ADEQUATE TEMPERATURES fOR DEVELOPMENT AS IS SEEN WITHIN B. boreas (KARLSTROM 1962; CAREY et al. 2005). TOADLETS ARE GENERALLY fULLY METAMORPHOSED IN APPROXIMATELY 10 WEEkS (FORREST et al. 2013). WHILE B. williamsi IS REPORTEDLY AcTIVE THROUGHOUT THE SUMMER (KRIS URQUHART, PERS. cOMM.), LITTLE IS kNOWN REGARDING DISPERSAL AND NON-bREEDING bEHAVIOR Of THIS TOAD. THE OVERALL POPULATION NUMbERS Of THIS TOAD ARE UNkNOWN; HOWEVER, THE cURRENT RANGE IS SEVERELY RESTRIcTED, SUGGESTING THAT THIS SPEcIES��� POPULATION IS LIkELY VERY SMALL. THE cOLORATION Of THIS TOAD IS STRIkING, bUT WITHIN THE WETLAND VEGETATION, THE DISRUPTED OLIVE AND fLEckING Of B. williamsi IS VERY cRYPTIc cAUSING THEIR DETEcTION TO bE DIffIcULT. THE MAIN STORES Of bUfOTOXIN ARE IN THE PAROTOID GLANDS, WHIcH ARE cONSPIcUOUS IN SHAPE AND TAN cOLOR, WHIcH cONTRASTS WITH THE OLIVE bAckGROUND cOLOR Of THE bODY, AND MAY TRIGGER, Published as part of Michelle R. Gordon, Eric T. Simandle & C. Richard Tracy, 2017, A diamond in the rough desert shrublands of the Great Basin in the Western United States: A new cryptic toad species (Amphibia: Bufonidae: Bufo (Anaxyrus )) discovered in Northern Nevada in Zootaxa 4290 (1) on pages 127-136, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4290.1.7, http://zenodo.org/record/1012647, {"references":["Stebbins, R. C. (2003) Peterson Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians. Third Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, pp. 208 - 211.","Stephens, M. R. (2001) Phylogeography of the Bufo boreas (Anura, Bufonoidea) Species Complex and the Biogeography of California. MA Thesis. Sonoma State University, CA.","Graybeal, A. (1993) The phylogenetic utility of Cytochrome b: Lessons from bufonid frogs. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2, 256 - 269. https: // doi. org / 10.1006 / mpev. 1993.1024","Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (2011) Environmental Assessment, TGP Dixie Development Company, LLC, Coyote Canyon and Dixie Meadows Geothermal Exploration. Document Number DOI-BLM-NV-C 010 - 2011 - 0001 - EA. Carson City, Nevada: Bureau of Land Management, Carson City District Office, pp. 1 - 193.","Karlstrom, E. L. (1962) The toad genus Bufo in the Sierra Nevada of California. Ecological and Systematic Relationships. University of California Publications in Zoology, 62, 1 - 104.","Frost, D. R. (2015) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0 American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Available from http: // research. amnh. org / herpetology / amphibia / index. html (accessed 9 December 2015)","Moler, P. E. (1985) A new species of frog (Ranadae: Rana) from northwestern Florida. Copeia, pp. 379 - 383.","Platz, J. E. & Forester, D. C. (1988) Geographic Variation in Mating Call among the Four Subspecies of the Chorus Frog: Pseudacris triseriata (Wied). Copeia, 1988, 1062 - 1066. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 1445734","Moriarty, E. C. & Cannatella, D. C. (2004) Phylogenetic relationships of the North American chorus frogs (Pseudacris: Hylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 30, 409420.","Hubbs, C. L. & Miller, R. R. (1948) The Zoological Evidence: Correlation between Fish Distribution and Hydrographic History in the Desert Basins of Western United States. Bulletin of the University of Utah, 38, 17166.","Shepard, W. D. (1992) Riffle beetles (Cleoptera: Elmidae) of Death Valley National Monument, California. Great Basin Naturalist, 52, 378 - 381.","Hershler, R. & Sada, D. W. (2002) Biogeography of Great Basin aquatic snails of the Genus Pyrgulopsis. In: Hershler, R., Sada, D. W. & Currey, D. R. (Eds), Great Basin Aquatic Systems History: Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences, 33, 255 - 276. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1095 - 8312.1996. tb 01434. x","Sada, D. W. & Vinyard, G. L. (2002) Anthropogenic changes in biogeography of Great Basin aquatic biota. In: Hershler, R., Madsen, D. B., & Currey, D. R. (Eds) Great Basin Aquatic Systems History. Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences, 33, 277 - 293.","Shepard, W. D. (1993) Desert springs- both rare and endangered. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 3, 351 - 359. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / aqc. 3270030409","Goebel, A. M. (2005) Conservation systematics: the Bufo boreas species group. In: Lannoo, M. J. (Ed.), Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, pp. 210 - 221. https: // doi. org / 10.1525 / california / 9780520235922.003.0030","Noles, P. M. (2010) Reconciling western toad phylogeography with Great Basin prehistory. MS Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada.","Trontelj, P & Fiser, C. (2009). Cryptic species diversity should not be trivialized. Systematics and Biodiversity, 7, 1 - 3. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 1477200008002909","IUCN (2015) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015 - 3. Available from: http: // www. iucnredlist. org (accessed 9 September 2015)","Blaustein, A. R. & Wake, D. B. (1990) Declining amphibian populations: A global phenomenon? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 203 - 204.","Bull, E. L. & Carey, C. (2008) Breeding frequency of western toads (Bufo boreas) in Northeastern Oregon. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 3, 282 - 288.","Kats, L. B. & Ferrer, R. P. (2003) Alien predators and amphibian declines: review of two decades of science and the transition to conservation. Diversity and Distributions Journal, 9, 99 - 110. https: // doi. org / 10.1046 / j. 1472 - 4642.2003.00013. x","Muths, E. (2003) Home range and movements of Boreal toads in undisturbed habitat. Copeia, 1, 160 - 165. https: // doi. org / 10.1643 / 0045 - 8511 (2003) 003 [0160: hramob] 2.0. co; 2","Bull, E. L. (2009) Dispersal of newly metamorphosed and juvenile western toads (Anaxyrus boreas) in Northeastern Oregon, USA. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 4, 236 - 247."]}