Search

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a safe and effective treatment option for adolescents with severe obesity, but no long-term studies are available with more than10 years of follow-up data to document sustained improved outcomes.A total of 96 patients who completed MBS at 21 years of age or younger in a tertiary academic center 2002 to 2010 were contacted for a telehealth visit. Body weight, comorbidity status, social/physical function status, and long-term complications were evaluated 10 to 18 years after surgery.Mean participant (83% female, 75% Hispanic) age at MBS was 18.8 (±1.6) years (median age 19 years, range 15-21 years), and median pre-MBS BMI was 44.7 kg/m 2 (SD 6.5). At follow-up (mean 14.2 [±2.2] years) post-MBS (90.6% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] or 8.3% laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding [LAGB]) mean total body weight decreased by 31.3% (interquartile range [IQR] 20.0% to 38.9%); 32.0% (IQR, 21.3% to 40.1%) among RYGB participants and 22.5% (IQR, 0.64% to 28.3%) among LAGB participants. Patients with pre-MBS hyperlipidemia (14.6%), asthma (10.4%), and diabetes/hyperglycemia (5.2%) reported 100% remission at follow-up (p0.05 for all). Pre-post decrease in hypertension (13.5% vs 1%, p = 0.001), sleep apnea (16.7% vs 1.0%, p0.001), gastroesophageal reflux disease (13.5% vs 3.1%, p = 0.016), anxiety (7.3% vs 2.1%, p = 0.169), and depression (27.1% vs 4.2%, p0.001) were also found.Significant sustained reductions in weight and comorbidities, and low rates of long-term complications, a decade or more after completing MBS as an adolescent were found. These findings have important implications for adolescents who may be considering MBS for weight reduction and overall health improvements that extend into adulthood.

Return to Intended Oncologic Treatment (RIOT) has been proposed as a quality metric in the care of cancer patients. We sought to define factors associated with inability to RIOT in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients.The NCDB was queried for patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pathologic stage IB, IIA, or IIB PDAC from 2010 to 2016. Multivariable binary logistic regression models identified factors associated with failure to RIOT, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox multivariable regression models demonstrated the impact of failure to RIOT on survival.Increasing age (p .001), Hispanic race (p = .002), pathological stage IB (p = .004) and IIA (p = .001) as compared to IIB, increasing hospital stay (p .001), and open surgical approach (p = .024) were associated with increased risk of inability to RIOT. Male sex (p .001), Charlson-Deyo scores of 0 (p .001) and 1 (p = .001) as compared to2, negative surgical margins (p = .048), receiving care at academic institutions (p = .001), and increasing institutional case volume (p = .001) were associated with improved odds of RIOT.Patient features can impact RIOT and should be considered when designing multi-modality treatment strategies.

Ultralow-noise microwave amplification and detection play a central role in different applications, going from fundamental physics experiments to the deployment of quantum technologies. In many applications the necessity of reading multiple detectors, or cavities or qubits, calls for large bandwidth amplifiers with the lowest possible noise. Current technologies are based on High Electron Mobility Transistors and Josephson Parametric Amplifiers. Both have limitations, the former in terms of the minimum noise, the latter in terms of bandwidth. Superconducting Traveling Wave Parametric Amplifiers (TWPAs) have the potential of offering quantum limited noise and large bandwidth. These amplifiers are based on the parametric amplification of microwaves traveling along a transmission line with embedded nonlinear elements. We are developing superconducting TWPAs based both on Josephson junction arrays (Traveling Wave Josephson Parametric mplifiers) and on nonlinear kinetic inductance (Dispersion Engineered Traveling Wave Kinetic Inductance Amplifiers). Our goal is to achieve large bandwidth (in the 5 to 10 GHz range), large gain (more than 20 dB), large saturation power (more than -50 dBm), and near quantum limited noise (noise temperature less than 600 mK). Current achievements in the design and development of the high performance TWPAs are here reported and discussed, together with current limitations and possible future developments.

Oncologic surgery for T1b-T3 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) consists of gallbladder fossa resection or bisegmentectomy IVb/V with negative margins and portal/retropancreatic lymphadenectomy. Frequency of high quality oncologic surgery, factors associated with its use, and the ability of chemotherapy to rescue low-quality surgery (LQS) remain unknown.The NCDB was queried for patients diagnosed with stage I-III (T1b-T3) GBC undergoing curative-intent surgery from 2004 to 2016. These patients were divided into two groups based on receiving high quality surgery (HQS) or not; HQS was defined as cholecystectomy with partial hepatectomy, lymph node harvest ≥ 6, and negative margins. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed.A total of 3796 patients met inclusion criteria; only 364 (9.6%) met HQS criteria, and 3432 (90.4%) did not achieve HQS and were deemed low-quality surgery (LQS). HQS was associated with improved median overall survival (55.1 vs. 25.5 months, P .001). Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was not able to rescue LQS with poorer survival compared to HQS without AC (27.9 vs 55.1 months, P .001). Factors associated with HQS included private insurance (OR 1.809, P .001), higher income (OR 1.380, P = .038), urban/rural residence (vs metropolitan) (OR 1.641, P = .001), higher education (OR 1.342, P = .031), Medicaid expansion states (OR 1.405, P = .005), stage 3 GBC (OR 1.642, P = .020), and reresection (OR 2.685, P .001). Factors associated with LQS included older age (OR 0.974, P .001), comorbidities (OR 0.701, P = .004), and laparoscopic approach (0.579, P .001). Facility type incrementally improved HQS rate (integrated cancer network vs. comprehensive community, 9.8% vs. 6.1%, OR 1.694, P = .003; academic/research center vs. integrated cancer network, 14.9% vs. 9.8%, OR 1.599, P = .003).While HQS for GBC strongly improves survival, it is infrequently practiced. The newly identified factors that improve survival for GBC, such as centralization, open approach, and insurance coverage, are modifiable and, therefore, should be considered to achieve optimal outcomes.

Background The aim is to develop and test the utility of an event-initiated, team-based check list to optimize the response to bleeding during laparoscopic HPB surgery. Methods To build a checklist for managing bleeding events, we conducted a systematic review. Using nominal group technique (NGT), a checklist consisting of four domains was developed. Following team-based training of anesthesia and surgical staff, the checklist was implemented. HPB cases before and after implementation of the checklist were compared for adverse outcomes, bleeding complications, and transfusions. Results NGT identified four domains: Communicate Control, Expose, and Repair under which the checklist was organized. Supplemental Video for a detailed review of how each domain was applied to a specific case example. We compared 169 HPB cases before to 53 cases after implementation. We found a significant decrease in mean EBL (from 518 ± 852.8 to 151.5 ± 221.7 ml (P = 0.001)) for cases performed after implementation of the checklist and a trends toward less volume of pRBC transfused (2.7 ± 2.5 vs 2.3 ± 1.7 units/per patient, P = 0.611) and transfusion rates (22% vs 11%, P = 0.703). Conclusion An event-initiated, team-based response to an adverse bleeding event during laparoscopic HPB surgery correlates with positive effects on bleeding management, and transfusion rates.

Background While minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) vs. open approach (OLR) has been shown to be safe, the perioperative and oncologic safety for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) specifically, necessitating often complex hepatectomy and extended lymphadenectomy, remains ill-defined. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with ICC undergoing liver resection from 2010 to 2016. After 1:1 Propensity Score Matching (PSM), Kruskal-Wallis and χ2 tests were applied to compare short-term outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox multivariable regression were performed. Results 988 patients met inclusion criteria: 140 (14.2%) MILR and 848 (85.8%) OLR resulting in 115 patients MILR and OLR after 1:1 PSM with c-index of 0.733. MILR had lower unplanned 30-day readmission [OR 0.075, P = 0.014] and positive margin rates [OR 0.361, P = 0.011] and shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) [OR 0.941, P = 0.026], but worse lymph node yield [1.52 vs 2.07, P = 0.001]. No difference was found for 30/90-day mortality. Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed that MILR was associated with poorer overall survival compared to OLR [HR 2.454, P = 0.001]. Subgroup analysis revealed that survival differences from approach were dependent on major hepatectomy, tumor size > 4 cm, or negative margins. Conclusion MILR vs. OLR is associated with worse lymphadenectomy and survival in patients with ICC greater than 4 cm requiring major hepatectomy. Hence, MILR major hepatectomy for ICC should only be approached selectively and if surgeons are able to perform an appropriate lymphadenectomy.

The rising incidence of thyroid cancer has been attributed to increased detection of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). Although some PTMCs are thought to harbor aggressive pathologic features, the clinical significance of these features remains unclear. This study examines factors associated with survival in this patient population.Adults with PTMC, defined as papillary thyroid carcinoma ≤ 1.0 cm, who underwent thyroidectomy between 2004 and 2016, were identified in the National Cancer Database. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed. The primary aim was to identify factors associated with survival. The secondary aim was to assess the association of microscopic margins on survival and to identify factors associated with margin positivity. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using log rank tests. Cox proportional hazards and binary logistic regression models identified factors associated with survival and margin positivity, respectively.Of 77,817 patients with PTMC, 13,507 met inclusion criteria; 2,649 (20%) of these patients presented with advanced features: extrathyroidal extension (n = 916, 7%), lymphovascular invasion (n = 398, 3%), lymph node involvement (n = 2,003, 15%), and distant metastasis (n = 39,1%). Microscopic margin positivity was present in 906 patients and associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio 1.58, 95% CI 1.04-2.41). Academic facilities (odds ratio [OR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.95) and operative volume (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.98) were associated with decreased margin positivity.Positive margin status was significantly associated with increased risk of death for PTMC. Higher operative volume and treatment at academic centers were associated with lower rates of margin positivity and may help improve survival outcomes in PTMC patients with aggressive features.

Socioeconomics, demographics, and insurance status play roles in healthcare access. Considering the limited resources available, understanding the relative impact of disparities helps prioritize programs designed to overcome them. This study evaluates gastrointestinal cancer care disparity by comparing the impact of different patient factors across oncologic care metrices. A multi-institutional prospectively maintained cancer database was reviewed retrospectively for gastrointestinal cancers (esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, colorectal, and hepato-pancreato-biliary) from 2007 to 2017 to assess quality of care provided. Quality of care was defined by clinical course following national guidelines for the respective cancer. This included surgical intervention, chemotherapy, palliative care, and minimal delay to treatment/diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders and identify factors associated with quality of care. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using log-rank test. One thousand seventy-two patients were identified. Survival improved in patients with private insurance compared to government-funded options [median overall survival (mOS) 57.8 vs. 21.2 months; P < .001]. Private insurance also correlated with earlier stage at diagnosis [stages I–II = 50.9% vs. 37.5%, stages III–IV = 37.7% vs. 49.1%, P < .001], increased chemotherapy use [44.2% vs. 37.1%, P < .001], and more surgical intervention [62.4% vs. 48.8%, P < .001]. Outcomes were inferior for Black Americans, including trend towards lower rate of surgical treatment [42% vs. 54%, P = .058] and worse survival in private insurance carriers [mOS 7.8 vs. 57.8 months, P = .021] and those with early stage disease [mOS 39.2 vs. 81.5 months, P = .045] compared to White counterparts. Insurance status has the strongest impact on the quality of gastrointestinal oncologic care with negative synergistic negative effect of race for Black Americans. While governmental programs aim to improve equality of care, there remains significant disparity compared to private insurance. Moreover, private insurance doesn’t correct disparity for Black Americans, suggesting the need to address racial imbalances in cancer care.

Background Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) comprises the majority of thyroid malignancy, but it is associated with excellent long-term survival. Highly prevalent, with increasing incidence, the optimal operative management for patients with 1- to 4-cm PTC remains unclear. This study determined factors that affect clinical outcomes, including survival, in this patient population. Study Design Patients with 1- to 4-cm PTC, who underwent thyroidectomy between 2004 and 2016, were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Factors affecting survival, including margin status, extent of resection, operative volume, and institution type, were studied. Outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier and log rank tests. Cox proportional hazard and binary logistic regression analyses identified factors affecting survival as well as margin positivity. Results Of 14,471 patients with 1- to 4-cm PTC, 2,269 (15.7%) exhibited lymphovascular invasion, 6,925 (47.9%) had multifocality, 14,235 (98.3%) underwent total thyroidectomy, and 2,212 (15.3%) had microscopic margin positivity, which conferred lower survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.464, p Conclusions In patients with 1- to 4-cm PTC, margin positivity confers lower survival. Factors associated with lower rate of margin positivity are higher operative volume and referral for treatment at academic center. Because margin positivity is a modifiable risk factor, referral of patients with aggressive features of PTC to high volume academic centers may improve survival.

While observation of T1(≤2cm) nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs) is an accepted practice, an ill-defined subgroup of patients with T1 tumors develops metastases. This study aimed to identify those patients via clinical factors. Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry who were diagnosed with NF-PanNET with size ≤2cm between 1998 and 2014 and who underwent primary tumor resection were identified. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with pathological nodal and systemic metastatic disease. A total of 612 patients with T1 NF-PanNETs were identified. Of those, 72 (11.7%) developed nodal metastasis and 35 (5.7%) distant metastasis (M1). In the multivariable analysis, tumor location in the pancreatic body (OR 1.903, p=0.03) (OR 1.407, p=0.038) or tail (OR 1.258, p=0.04) (OR 1.612, p=0.021); tumor grade III–IV (OR 2.042, p=0.022) (OR 5.379, p≤0.001); and younger age (OR 0.963, p=0.01) (OR 0.919, p=0.009) were associated with nodal metastases and the presence of M1 disease, respectively. While the low metastatic potential of ≤2cm NF-PanNET implies watchful waiting to be an appropriate strategy for most patients, the increased risk of metastatic disease in younger patients with high grade (III–IV) body/tail tumors suggests individualized risk stratification to be optimal.

While studies have reported improved morbidity of laparoscopic (LG) compared with open gastrectomy (OG), it remains unclear whether comparable oncologic outcomes can be achieved. This study aims at comparing not only short-term outcomes, including 30- and 90-day mortality, but also survival of LG vs OG. The National Cancer Database was searched for adult patients with histologically proven gastric cancer and complete information regarding M0 disease, tumor size, differentiation grade, T stage, nodal status, comorbidities, type of hospital, hospital stay, type of surgery, oncological treatment and survival data were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze margin status, 30- and 90-day mortality, and 30-day re-admission rate. Linear regression was performed for length of hospital stay and lymph node yield. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed to evaluate median survival. Cox multivariable regression models were created to correct for confounders and identify factors affecting survival. A query of the National Cancer Database identified 13,538 patients with complete dataset. A significant regression equation favoring LG for lymph node yield, hospital stay, and unplanned re-admission rate was identified. There was no significant effect of surgical approach on R1 margin rate, 30-day mortality, or 90-day mortality. Median survival was comparable between LG and OG (44.8 vs 40.2 months, p = 0.804). LG offers a safe surgical approach to gastric cancer with shorter hospital stay and lower re-admission rates than OG, and also similar and sometimes improved operative oncologic quality parameters (margin, lymph node yield). More importantly, this Western series demonstrates that equivalent long-term outcomes of LG vs. OG are being achieved.

While preoperative chemotherapy for patients with stage II-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is frequently practiced, its impact on very early PDAC (stage I) remains unclear today. Patients undergoing pancreatectomy for PDAC between 2010 and 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Early-stage patients (IA-IB) with complete oncologic and clinical information and more than 30-day survival were included. The effect of preoperative chemotherapy on margin status was assessed with binary logistic regression. Following correction for confounders, the effect of therapy sequencing was assessed via comparison of preoperative, postoperative, perioperative (pre- and post-operative) chemotherapy, and surgery only using Cox regression. Of 4785 patients, 688 (14.4%) were stage IA, and 4197 (87.7%) IB. The rate of preoperative chemotherapy was only 8.8%. Rate of margin positivity was lower for preoperative chemotherapy (12.3% vs 19.7%). After correcting for confounders, the risk of a positive margin was lower in preoperative chemotherapy (odd ratio [OR] 0.703, p = 0.042). Cox regression showed a significant overall survival advantage for preoperative (hazard ratio [HR] 0.784, p = 0.002), postoperative (HR 0.618, p

The creation of sagittal balance of the spine is critical in the treatment adult spinal deformity. Anterior column release (ACR) has gained traction as a minimally invasive alternative to pedicle subtraction osteotomy. By releasing the anterior longitudinal ligament, the anterior column can be lengthened and physiologic lordosis restored. Risks such as transient psoas weakness and thigh numbness have been well documented in the literature; however, diaphragmatic hernia has never been reported.To highlight the difficulties encountered in diagnosing, managing, and treating iatrogenic diaphragmatic hernia in the setting of ACR and stress the relevant retropleural, retroperitoneal, and diaphragmatic structures during the surgical approach.In this technical note, we discuss the relevant anatomy in a direct lateral approach to the thoracolumbar junction and the management of an iatrogenic diaphragmatic hernia, which occurred in a patient who underwent a L1 ACR.Three months after surgery, our patient was assessed in clinic and endorsed significant improvements in her pain and mobility. Her 3-month postoperative scoliosis x-rays demonstrated a significant improvement in her sagittal alignment, and she experienced no further negative sequelae from the iatrogenic hernia.Iatrogenic diaphragmatic hernia with an intrathoracic spleen after direct lateral ACR is a risk spine surgeons should be aware of and address promptly.

Reducing noise to the quantum limit over a large bandwidth is a fundamental requirement for future applications operating at millikelvin temperatures, such as the neutrino mass measurement, the next-generation X-ray observatory, the CMB measurement, the dark matter and axion detection, and the rapid high-fidelity readout of superconducting qubits. The read out sensitivity of arrays of microcalorimeter detectors, resonant axion-detectors, and qubits, is currently limited by the noise temperature and bandwidth of the cryogenic amplifiers. The Detector Array Readout with Traveling Wave Amplifiers project has the goal of developing high-performing innovative traveling wave parametric amplifiers with a high gain, a high saturation power, and a quantum-limited or nearly quantum-limited noise. The practical development follows two different promising approaches, one based on the Josephson junctions and the other one based on the kinetic inductance of a high-resistivity superconductor. In this contribution, we present the aims of the project, the adopted design solutions and preliminary results from simulations and measurements.

While it has been shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for pancreatic cancer (PDAC) undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is critical for optimal oncologic management, NCT is (A) not universally practiced and (B) the reasons ill-defined. This study investigates national rates, trends, and factors affecting NCT utilization.Using the National Cancer Database, patients who underwent PD for PDAC between 2006 and 2017 were identified. Changes in chemotherapy sequence over time were identified. For patients diagnosed after 2010, multivariable logistic regression models for factors affecting NCT were created.A total of 128,980 patients were diagnosed and 23,206 underwent surgery. Three thousand five (12.9%) received NCT with a preoperative chemotherapy (NCT + PCT) utilization rate of 7.3% in 2004 that increased to 36.8% in 2017. Factors affecting utilization of preoperative chemotherapy were age (OR 0.972), academic and integrated network institutions (OR 1.916, OR 1.559), institutional case volume (OR 1.007), distance from the hospital (OR 1.002), stage (IB OR 3.108, IIA OR 3.133, IIB OR 3.775, III OR 3.782), grade IV (OR 1.977), and insurance status (private OR 2.371, Medicaid OR 1.811, and Medicare OR 2.191, government OR 2.645).Even though more than 3/5 of patients receive no preoperative chemotherapy (NCT + PCT) and nearly 1/5 of patients still receive no chemotherapy at all, utilization of NCT is increasing. Moreover, since this study demonstrates that omission of NCT is associated with modifiable factors such as type of institution and health care disparity, mechanisms (reimbursement, policy) geared to change current national practice patterns may most immediately affect optimal oncologic management.

While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is frequently utilized to remove small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), MIS surgery for tumors ≥ 5 cm is currently not endorsed by national guidelines as standard of care due to concerns of safety and inferior oncologic outcomes. Hence this study investigates the perioperative and long-term outcomes of MIS for T3 gastric GIST measuring 5-10 cm.The National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2017 was queried for gastric GIST measuring 5-10 cm or T3 category. Inclusion criteria were known: stage, size, comorbidities, grade, lymphovascular invasion, type of surgery, approach, conversion info, margin status, mitotic rate, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, hospital stay, readmission, 30- and 90-day mortality, complete follow-up, type of institution, and hospital gastric surgery case volume. Binary logistic regression, linear regression models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used.In 3765 patients, mean tumor size was 67.3 mm; 26.3% MIS; and 73.8% open. Median hospital stay was shorter for MIS (4.77 vs 7.04 days, p 0.001). There was no significant difference in incidence of R1 margins [2.9% MIS vs. 3.1% open (p = 0.143)], unplanned readmission [2.9% MIS and 4.1% open (OR 0.474 p = 0.025)], 30-day mortality [0.5% MIS vs 1.2% open (OR 0.325, p = 0.031)], and 90-day mortality [0.9% MIS vs 2.1% open (OR 0.478 p = 0.036)]. Cox regression models for OS showed no difference in survival (p = 0.137, HR 0.808).This analysis provides substantial evidence that MIS for gastric GIST ≥ 5-10 cm may not only offer improved postoperative morbidity but also oncologic safety. Moreover, as both approaches lead to similar long-term survival, national guidelines may need to incorporate this new information.

While minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) vs. open approach (OLR) has been shown to be safe, the perioperative and oncologic safety for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) specifically, necessitating often complex hepatectomy and extended lymphadenectomy, remains ill-defined.The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with ICC undergoing liver resection from 2010 to 2016. After 1:1 Propensity Score Matching (PSM), Kruskal-Wallis and χ988 patients met inclusion criteria: 140 (14.2%) MILR and 848 (85.8%) OLR resulting in 115 patients MILR and OLR after 1:1 PSM with c-index of 0.733. MILR had lower unplanned 30-day readmission [OR 0.075, P = 0.014] and positive margin rates [OR 0.361, P = 0.011] and shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) [OR 0.941, P = 0.026], but worse lymph node yield [1.52 vs 2.07, P = 0.001]. No difference was found for 30/90-day mortality. Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed that MILR was associated with poorer overall survival compared to OLR [HR 2.454, P = 0.001]. Subgroup analysis revealed that survival differences from approach were dependent on major hepatectomy, tumor size 4 cm, or negative margins.MILR vs. OLR is associated with worse lymphadenectomy and survival in patients with ICC greater than 4 cm requiring major hepatectomy. Hence, MILR major hepatectomy for ICC should only be approached selectively and if surgeons are able to perform an appropriate lymphadenectomy.

Background COVID-19’s precise impact on cancer patients and their oncologic care providers remains poorly understood. This study aims at comparatively analyzing COVID-19’s effect on cancer care from both patient and provider perspectives. Methods A multi-institutional survey was developed to assess COVID-19-specific concerns regarding treatment, safety, and emotional stress through 5-point Likert-type prompts and open-ended questions before and during the pandemic. Wilcoxon signed-rank and rank-sum tests were used to analyze before/during answers for providers and patients independently. Open-ended responses were assessed using inductive thematic analysis. Results The survey was completed by 104 (69.3%) patients and 50 (50%) providers. Patients demonstrated a significant change in only 1 of 15 Likert prompts. Most significant were increased concern regarding susceptibility to infection [z = 2.536, p = 0.011] and concerns regarding their cancer outcome [z = 4.572, p < 0.001]. Non-physician providers demonstrated significant change in 8 of 13 Likert prompts, whereas physicians had all 13 Likert prompts change in the COVID-19 setting. Physicians believed care to be more poorly planned [z = −3.857, p ≤ 0.001], availability of protective personal equipment to be more limited [z = −4.082, p < 0.001], and were significantly concerned infecting family members [z = 4.965, p < 0.001]. Conclusions While patients had more difficulty coping with their cancer, they did not perceive significant differences in their actual treatment. This suggests the need for a renewed focus on patients coping with cancer. Among providers, physicians more than any other provider group had a strong negative perception of COVID-19’s impact on healthcare, suggesting the need for novel approaches to target physician burnout.

Socioeconomics, demographics, and insurance status play roles in healthcare access. Considering the limited resources available, understanding the relative impact of disparities helps prioritize programs designed to overcome them. This study evaluates gastrointestinal cancer care disparity by comparing the impact of different patient factors across oncologic care metrices.A multi-institutional prospectively maintained cancer database was reviewed retrospectively for gastrointestinal cancers (esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, colorectal, and hepato-pancreato-biliary) from 2007 to 2017 to assess quality of care provided. Quality of care was defined by clinical course following national guidelines for the respective cancer. This included surgical intervention, chemotherapy, palliative care, and minimal delay to treatment/diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders and identify factors associated with quality of care. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using log-rank test.One thousand seventy-two patients were identified. Survival improved in patients with private insurance compared to government-funded options [median overall survival (mOS) 57.8 vs. 21.2 months; P.001]. Private insurance also correlated with earlier stage at diagnosis [stages I-II = 50.9% vs. 37.5%, stages III-IV = 37.7% vs. 49.1%, P.001], increased chemotherapy use [44.2% vs. 37.1%, P.001], and more surgical intervention [62.4% vs. 48.8%, P.001]. Outcomes were inferior for Black Americans, including trend towards lower rate of surgical treatment [42% vs. 54%, P = .058] and worse survival in private insurance carriers [mOS 7.8 vs. 57.8 months, P = .021] and those with early stage disease [mOS 39.2 vs. 81.5 months, P = .045] compared to White counterparts.Insurance status has the strongest impact on the quality of gastrointestinal oncologic care with negative synergistic negative effect of race for Black Americans. While governmental programs aim to improve equality of care, there remains significant disparity compared to private insurance. Moreover, private insurance doesn't correct disparity for Black Americans, suggesting the need to address racial imbalances in cancer care.

Although laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) versus open approaches (ODP) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with reduced morbidity, its impact on optimal adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) utilization remains unclear. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether oncologic resection quality markers are equivalent between approaches. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried between 2010 and 2016 for PDAC patients undergoing DP. Effect of LDP vs ODP and institutional case volumes on margin status, hospital stay, 30-day and 90-day mortality, administration of and delay to AC, and 30-day unplanned readmission were analyzed using binary and linear logistic regression. Cox multivariable regression was used to correct for confounders. The search yielded 3411 patients; 996 (29.2%) had LDP and 2415 (70.8%) had ODP. ODP had higher odds of readmission [odds ratio (OR) 1.681, p = 0.01] and longer hospital stay [β 1.745, p = 0.004]. No difference was found for 30-day mortality [OR 1.689, p = 0.303], 90-day mortality [OR 1.936, p = 0.207], and overall survival [HR 1.231, p = 0.057]. The highest-volume centers had improved odds of AC [OR 1.275, p = 0.027] regardless of approach. LDP conferred lower margin positivity [OR 0.581, p = 0.005], increased AC use [3rd quartile: OR 1.844, p = 0.026; 4th quartile; OR 2.144, p = 0.045], and fewer AC delays [4th quartile: OR 0.786, p = 0.045] in higher-volume centers. In selected patients, LDP offers an oncologically safe alternative to ODP for PDAC independent of institutional volume. However, additional oncologic benefit due to optimal AC utilization and lower positive margin rates in higher volume centers suggests that LDP by experienced teams can achieve best possible cancer outcomes.

While observation of T1(≤2cm) nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs) is an accepted practice, an ill-defined subgroup of patients with T1 tumors develops metastases. This study aimed to identify those patients via clinical factors.Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry who were diagnosed with NF-PanNET with size ≤2cm between 1998 and 2014 and who underwent primary tumor resection were identified. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with pathological nodal and systemic metastatic disease.A total of 612 patients with T1 NF-PanNETs were identified. Of those, 72 (11.7%) developed nodal metastasis and 35 (5.7%) distant metastasis (M1). In the multivariable analysis, tumor location in the pancreatic body (OR 1.903, p=0.03) (OR 1.407, p=0.038) or tail (OR 1.258, p=0.04) (OR 1.612, p=0.021); tumor grade III-IV (OR 2.042, p=0.022) (OR 5.379, p≤0.001); and younger age (OR 0.963, p=0.01) (OR 0.919, p=0.009) were associated with nodal metastases and the presence of M1 disease, respectively.While the low metastatic potential of ≤2cm NF-PanNET implies watchful waiting to be an appropriate strategy for most patients, the increased risk of metastatic disease in younger patients with high grade (III-IV) body/tail tumors suggests individualized risk stratification to be optimal.

Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) minimizes the risk of a positive retroperitoneal margin and maximizes lymph node harvest in distal pancreatic cancers.1-7 In those with celiac trunk involvement, resection of the celiac trunk (modified Appleby procedure) is a surgical option in which postoperative liver perfusion relies on blood flow via superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and gastroduodenal artery (GDA).8, 9 PATIENT: A 66-year-old male was diagnosed with a 3.8 × 2.5 cm pancreatic body adenocarcinoma abutting the celiac trunk. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was initiated with a uniquely good response.Prior to surgery, a novel preoperative 3D simulation technique accounting for organ displacement during pneumoperitoneum with the goal of optimizing port placement and surgical decision making was employed. At surgery, a RAMPS procedure was performed with the renal vessels and adrenal gland being dissected first (reversed from typical open approach). Following dissection along the SMA towards the celiac axis, desmoplastic reaction enveloping the celiac trunk necessitated its resection. Arterial liver perfusion was confirmed with intraoperative ultrasound.L-RAMPS and modified Appleby procedure is a curative option for patients with distal pancreatic cancers that invade the celiac trunk and in whom the tumor biology is well controlled. A preplanned approach with 3D reconstruction accounting for organ displacement due to pneumoperitoneum optimizes surgical decision making and port placement for visual alignment caudally along the SMA.

Background This study aimed to investigate the relationship between hospital case volume, surgical approach and AC-use in patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods Patients were divided into quartiles by institutional pancreatectomy case volume, resection type (pancreaticoduodenectomy [PD], distal pancreatectomy [DP], or total pancreatectomy [TP]) and surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open). The rates and contributing factors of AC administration and delay >90 days were compared among volume quartiles and surgical approaches. Results This study identified 23,494 patients who had undergone pancreatectomy for PDAC between 2010 and 2016 and met inclusion criteria. After correcting for confounders, compared to low volume hospitals patients at high-case-volume hospitals had the highest rates of AC administration after PD and DP. Moreover, compared to open surgery for all resection types, laparoscopic surgery was associated with a higher rate of AC use at high and highest-case-volume hospitals and less delay to chemotherapy at high-volume hospitals. For DP, laparoscopic approach had a positive impact on AC delay >90-day at the highest volume institutions only. Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic cancer leads to higher utilization and lower probability of delay of AC in high and highest volume hospitals.

In patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC), minimally invasive surgery (MIS) may offer optimal oncologic outcome with low morbidity. However, the relative benefit of MIS compared to open surgery in patients requiring multistage resections has not been evaluated.Patients who underwent totally minimally invasive (TMI) or totally open (TO) resections of CRC primary and liver metastases (CLM) in 2009-2016 were analyzed. Inverse probability of weighted adjustment by propensity score was performed before analyzing risk factors for complications and survival.The study included 43 TMI and 121 TO patients. Before and after adjustment, TMI patients had significantly less cumulated postoperative complications (41% vs. 59%, p = 0.001), blood loss (median 100 vs. 200 ml, p = 0.001) and shorter length of hospital stay (median 4.5 vs. 6.0 days, p0.001). Multivariate analysis identified TO approach vs. MIS (OR = 2.4, p0.001), major liver resection (OR = 4.4, p0.001), and multiple CLM (OR = 2.3, p = 0.001) as independent risk factors for complications. 5-year overall survival was comparable (81% vs 68%, p = 0.59).In patients with CRC undergoing multistage surgical treatment, MIS resection contributes to optimal perioperative outcomes without compromise in oncologic outcomes.

Organ allocation criteria for liver transplantation focus on tumor size and multifocality while tumor differentiation and existing liver damage are omitted. This study analyzes the impact of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) grade and liver fibrosis comparing resection (SX) to transplantation (LT).The National Cancer Database was queried between 2004 and 2016 for solitary HCC meeting Milan criteria undergoing SX vs LT. Two groups were created: low fibrosis (LF) vs high fibrosis (HF) and stratified by grade. Cox multivariable regression models, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and log-rank tests were performed.1515 patients were identified; 780 had LT and 735 had SX. Median overall survival (mOS) was 39.7 months; LT mOS was 47.9 months vs SX mOS of 34.9 months (P .001). Multivariate analysis revealed SX, no chemotherapy, longer hospital stays, and age to be associated with worse survival. However, while transplantation conferred survival benefit for well-moderately differentiated tumors, SX vs LT did not impact survival for poorly differentiated HCC in LF patients, independent of tumor size.HCC differentiation and liver fibrosis, but not size, synergistically determine efficacy of SX vs LT. Therefore, current HCC transplantation criteria should incorporate tumor grade or liver fibrosis for optimal organ allocation.

Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) minimizes the risk of a positive retroperitoneal margin and maximizes lymph node harvest in distal pancreatic cancers.1–7 In those with celiac trunk involvement, resection of the celiac trunk (modified Appleby procedure) is a surgical option in which postoperative liver perfusion relies on blood flow via superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and gastroduodenal artery (GDA).8, 9 A 66-year-old male was diagnosed with a 3.8 × 2.5 cm pancreatic body adenocarcinoma abutting the celiac trunk. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was initiated with a uniquely good response. Prior to surgery, a novel preoperative 3D simulation technique accounting for organ displacement during pneumoperitoneum with the goal of optimizing port placement and surgical decision making was employed. At surgery, a RAMPS procedure was performed with the renal vessels and adrenal gland being dissected first (reversed from typical open approach). Following dissection along the SMA towards the celiac axis, desmoplastic reaction enveloping the celiac trunk necessitated its resection. Arterial liver perfusion was confirmed with intraoperative ultrasound. L-RAMPS and modified Appleby procedure is a curative option for patients with distal pancreatic cancers that invade the celiac trunk and in whom the tumor biology is well controlled. A preplanned approach with 3D reconstruction accounting for organ displacement due to pneumoperitoneum optimizes surgical decision making and port placement for visual alignment caudally along the SMA.

Indications for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in the population with thin melanoma have frequently changed over time. The objective of our study was to evaluate T1 melanoma pathologic features predictive of SLN positivity with a primary focus on identifying a specific mitotic value that is most predictive of lymph node disease. Further detailed predictive features would help physicians select patients with thin melanoma for SLN biopsy.The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for all patients diagnosed with trunk or extremity cutaneous melanoma with ≤1 mm depth who underwent SLN biopsy between the years of 2010 and 2013. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics including depth, mitotic rate (MR), ulceration, and tumor location were evaluated. MR was dichotomized at multiple cut points to identify the ideal number of mitosis for MR as a predictor of SLN status. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors affecting nodal positivity and the impact of MR threshold. Kaplan-Meir curves were used for overall survival (OS) analysis.Factors significantly associated with SLN positivity in the entire cohort included MR (P 0.001, OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.18-1.31), tumor location (P = 0.017, OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.07-2.05), and ulceration (P 0.001, OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.39-2.93,). An MR ≥ 4 was significant for SLN positivity (P = 0.049, OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.38). Mean OS was 46.7 mo for MR 4 compared with 43.2 mo for MR ≥ 4 (P 0.001).MR ≥ 4 was significant and associated with SLN positivity in thin melanomas and asulceration. Thus, MR ≥ 4 should be considered as an indication for SLN biopsy in thin melanoma.

While preoperative chemotherapy for patients with stage II-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is frequently practiced, its impact on very early PDAC (stage I) remains unclear today.Patients undergoing pancreatectomy for PDAC between 2010 and 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Early-stage patients (IA-IB) with complete oncologic and clinical information and more than 30-day survival were included. The effect of preoperative chemotherapy on margin status was assessed with binary logistic regression. Following correction for confounders, the effect of therapy sequencing was assessed via comparison of preoperative, postoperative, perioperative (pre- and post-operative) chemotherapy, and surgery only using Cox regression.Of 4785 patients, 688 (14.4%) were stage IA, and 4197 (87.7%) IB. The rate of preoperative chemotherapy was only 8.8%. Rate of margin positivity was lower for preoperative chemotherapy (12.3% vs 19.7%). After correcting for confounders, the risk of a positive margin was lower in preoperative chemotherapy (odd ratio [OR] 0.703, p = 0.042). Cox regression showed a significant overall survival advantage for preoperative (hazard ratio [HR] 0.784, p = 0.002), postoperative (HR 0.618, p 0.001), and perioperative (HR 0.601, p 0.001) chemotherapy compared with surgery alone. There was no significant difference in survival between chemotherapy groups but a trend towards optimal survival for preoperative chemotherapy.Despite preoperative chemotherapy vs surgery alone resulting in improved R0 rates and overall survival even in stage I PDAC, it is rarely practiced. The results presented here suggest that preoperative chemotherapy should be strongly considered in all patients with resectable PDAC, including very early PDAC.

The impact of lymph node (LN) status and lymphadenectomy (LA) on survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) remains controversial. We evaluated the impact of tumor extension and grade on nodal metastasis and survival. Surgical pNET patients were queried in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1998–2012, N = 981). Factors associated with LN status were analyzed by logistic regression and by Cox analyses. For T1–T2 tumors, N status was associated only with tumor size. N status (p = 0.001), grade (p

The safety and oncologic outcomes of patients with advanced cirrhosis undergoing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) compared to open resection (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. Patients with HCC resection during 2010–2014 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Patients with severe fibrosis; single lesions; M0; and known grade, margin status, tumor size, length of hospital stay, 30- and 90-day mortality, 30-day readmission, surgical approach, and complete follow-up were included. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis of LLR:OLR was performed. Prognostic effect of LLR was assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 1799 hepatectomy patients (minor (n = 491, 27.3%); major (n = 1308, 72.7%)) were included. Of 193 (10.7%) LLR patients, 190 were eligible for matching. The LLR vs OLR did not differ for patient characteristics, resection margin status, and 30-day (p = 0.141), 90-day mortality (p = 0.121), or 30-day readmission (p = 0.784). Median hospital stay was shorter for LLR (6 vs 8 days, p = 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was similar for LLR vs OLR (44.2 and 39.5 months, respectively, p = 0.064). Predictors of worse OS were older age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, p = 0.034), > 2 comorbidities (HR 1.29, p = 0.012), grade 3–4 disease (HR 1.81, p = 0.025), N1 disease (HR 1.04, p = 0.048), and R1 margins (HR 1.34, p = 0.002). After adjustment for confounders, LLR vs OLR was not a significant risk factor for OS (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.76–1.71, p = 0.522). While LLR in advanced cirrhosis for patients with HCC proved safe, optimal patient selection based on the preoperatively available factors comorbidities, age, degree of underlying liver disease, and high-quality oncologic surgery will determine long-term survival.