Search

Artificial intelligence and natural language processing tools have shown promise in oncology by assisting with medical literature retrieval and providing patient support. The potential for these technologies to generate inaccurate yet seemingly correct information poses significant challenges. This study evaluates the effectiveness, benefits, and limitations of ChatGPT for clinical use in conducting literature reviews of radiation oncology treatments. This cross-sectional study used ChatGPT version 3.5 to generate literature searches on radiotherapy options for seven tumor sites, with prompts issued five times per site to generate up to 50 publications per tumor type. The publications were verified using the Scopus database and categorized as correct, irrelevant, or non-existent. Statistical analysis with one-way ANOVA compared the impact factors and citation counts across different tumor sites. Among the 350 publications generated, there were 44 correct, 298 non-existent, and 8 irrelevant papers. The average publication year of all generated papers was 2011, compared to 2009 for the correct papers. The average impact factor of all generated papers was 38.8, compared to 113.8 for the correct papers. There were significant differences in the publication year, impact factor, and citation counts between tumor sites for both correct and non-existent papers. Our study highlights both the potential utility and significant limitations of using AI, specifically ChatGPT 3.5, in radiation oncology literature reviews. The findings emphasize the need for verification of AI outputs, development of standardized quality assurance protocols, and continued research into AI biases to ensure reliable integration into clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form and declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.)

Purpose: Procedural anxiety of cancer treatments may negatively impact patients and treatments. Mindfulness-promoting environment modification with virtual reality (VR) is increasingly used across medicine to minimize procedural anxiety. We aimed to assess the impacts of intrafraction mindfulness-promoting VR use during external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) on radiation therapy experience and physiological measures of distress., Methods and Materials: Adult patients receiving EBRT between May and October 2023 at our institution without contraindications to wearing VR were eligible. Participants had heart rates recorded before and after EBRT and completed a post-EBRT survey for 1 treatment without intervention, and 1 using VR. Participants completed the Radiotherapy Experience Questionnaire and additional questions regarding VR. Quantitative data were compared between conditions using paired samples t test., Results: Fifty-two participants completed the project. Between pre- and post-EBRT, a significant decrease in heart rate with VR was noted (80.35 bpm vs 71.79 bpm; P < .0001*), but not in the control condition (78.90 bpm vs 78.10 bpm; P = .44). Post-EBRT heart rate was significantly lower with VR than without (71.79 bpm vs 78.10 bpm; P < .01*). Radiotherapy Experience Questionnaire responses showed participants had significantly lower situational unease (1.46 vs 2.02; P < .001*), a more beneficial situational response (1.55 vs 2.12; P < .01*), and improved environment acceptance (1.30 vs 1.60; P < .01*) when using VR. Most endorsed VR as comfortable (94%), improved treatment experience (86%), and would recommend it to others (86%)., Conclusions: We report the first evidence of the impacts of intrafraction mindfulness-promoting VR use during EBRT. Physiological measures of distress and patient perspectives suggest that VR can minimize procedural anxiety, is well tolerated, and improves the overall treatment experience. Further research should explore modifying this tool for patients unable to wear headsets and determining where the most clinically significant benefits can be found., Competing Interests: Giselle Tucker Belliveau reports financial support was provided by Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Effective documentation serves as a cornerstone for communication and patient care, especially in radiation oncology (RO). Studies have shown room for improvement in documentation practices, and although documentation guidelines exist, it is uncertain if RO physicians are aware of or adhere to them. We aimed to assess RO resident physicians' medicolegal knowledge and the impact of an educational intervention on documentation practices. Grading rubrics for consultation and progress notes were created using guidelines, comprising of a fundamental score and total score. Residents from two institutions attended a didactic seminar on medicolegal documentation. Pre- and post-seminar, an electronic anonymous survey was used to assess resident knowledge and perspectives and random resident consultation and progress notes were scored. Mean documentation and survey item scores from pre- and post-seminar were compared. Fourteen resident physicians participated and completed surveys, and 48 consultation notes and 40 progress notes were analyzed. No participant had prior education specific to RO documentation, nor were any aware of available resources. Post-seminar, participants' medicolegal documentation knowledge significantly increased (86.61% vs. 95.54%, p = 0.001), as did the fundamental score (83.64% vs 89.29%, p = 0.041) and total scores of consultation notes (69.82% vs. 78.98%, p = 0.001) and total score of progress notes (55% vs. 75.19%, p < 0.001). Our seminar significantly enhanced residents' medicolegal knowledge and quality of documentation, and surveys revealed a lack of speciality specific documentation education. This combined with findings from other studies and participant opinions suggest that resident physicians would benefit from such training during residency., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.)

In an era of increasing virtual communication, we aimed to investigate current formats used by radiation oncology residents for reviewing radiation treatment plans with attendings, preferences for formats, and reasons contributing to preferences. Residents enrolled in Canadian radiation oncology programs received questionnaires examining training level, typical review formats, preferred format, and reasons for preference. Analysis excluded PGY-1s due to insufficient exposure. Fifty-two residents participated. National response rate was 55%. Overall, hybrid review was the most used format (77%). Virtual review was the most preferred format (44%). Preference for virtual review was most common among junior residents (57%), while in-person review was most preferred by senior residents (45.4%). Few residents typically use their preferred format (35%). Reasons for preference varied between groups in convenience (p < 0.01), interactivity (p < 0.01), and teaching quality (p = 0.04). The persistence of e-learning suggests that virtual treatment planning education will continue to some degree. Junior residents prefer virtual review, while a clearly preferred review format was less apparent among senior residents. Preferences are multifactorial, and the trends seen in reasons for preference between formats may reflect advantages inherent to each. Progress is still needed in optimizing treatment planning education, as suggested by few residents using their preferred format. Residents and staff should collectively decide which educational format for treatment planning best meets educational needs., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.)

Research shows decreased brain region activity in the right temporo-parietal junction (rTPJ) in people with migraine headache relative to headache-free controls when performing an orienting visuospatial attention task. Functional inactivation of the rTPJ has been associated with rightward performance deviations on laterality-based attention Landmark (LM) and greyscale (GRE) tasks in individuals with unilateral neglect and heightened activation in the rTPJ is associated with leftward deviation, known as pseudoneglect, in controls on these tasks. Given this, we investigated whether migraineurs would lack the leftward deviation found in headache-free controls on visuospatial attention tasks. 36 migraineurs and 38 controls were presented with LM and GRE tasks. Response bias scores showed a significant difference in responses between groups ( p  = 0.036) on the GRE, a luminance-based task, but not on the LM, a size-based task ( p  = 0.826). This study is the first to show laterality-based attentional differences in migraineurs, as compared to controls. Specifically, migraineurs were found to have smaller leftward biases on luminance-based visuospatial attention tasks, as compared to controls, aligning with previous research suggesting that migraine may be having an impact on a variety of attention tasks in migraineurs in between headache attacks.