Search

Introduction The combination of a CDK4/6 inhibitor with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) has recently become the gold standard for AI-sensitive first line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer. However, most patients receiving this combination will ultimately progress and require further therapies.Several studies have demonstrated that the onset of a ESR1 gene mutation lead to AIs resistance in the advanced setting. ESR1 mutations can be detected in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) using a digital PCR assay. Our study aims to prove the clinical efficacy of periodic monitoring for emerging or rise of ESR1 mutations in ctDNA to trigger an early change from AI plus palbociclib to fulvestrant plus palbociclib treatment while assessing global safety.Methods PADA-1 is a randomised, open-label, multicentric, phase III trial conducted in patients receiving AI and palbociclib as first line therapy for metastatic ER +HER2- breast cancer. 1000 patients will be included and treated with palbociclib in combination with an AI. Patients will be screened for circulating blood ESR1 mutation detection at regular intervals. Patients for whom a rising circulating ESR1 mutation is detected without tumour progression (up to N=200) will be randomised (1:1) between (1) Arm A: no modification of therapy; and (2) Arm B: palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant, a selective ER down-regulator. At tumour progression, an optional crossover will be offered to patients randomised in arm A. The coprimary endpoints are (1) Grade ≥3 haematological toxicities and their associations with baseline characteristics and (2) progression-free survival in randomised patients.Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the French medicines agency (ANSM) and by an ethics committee (ref 01/17_1 CPP Ouest-IV Nantes) in January 2017. The trial results will be published in academic conference presentations and international peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numbers EudraCT: 2016-004360-18; NCT03079011.

Purpose: The OlympiA randomized phase III trial compared 1 year of olaparib (OL) or placebo (PL) as adjuvant therapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2 , high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer after completing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy ([N]ACT), surgery, and radiotherapy. The patient-reported outcome primary hypothesis was that OL-treated patients may experience greater fatigue during treatment., Methods: Data were collected before random assignment, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary end point was fatigue, measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale. Secondary end points, assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 item, included nausea and vomiting (NV), diarrhea, and multiple functional domains. Scores were compared between treatment groups using mixed model for repeated measures. Two-sided P values <.05 were statistically significant for the primary end point. All secondary end points were descriptive., Results: One thousand five hundred and thirty-eight patients (NACT: 746, ACT: 792) contributed to the analysis. Fatigue severity was statistically significantly greater for OL versus PL, but not clinically meaningfully different by prespecified criteria (≥3 points) at 6 months (diff OL v PL: NACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .022; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.3 to -0.2]; P = .017) and 12 months (NACT: -1.6 [95% CI, -2.8 to -0.3]; P = .017; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .025). There were no significant differences in fatigue severity between treatment groups at 18 and 24 months. NV severity was worse in patients treated with OL compared with PL at 6 months (NACT: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.0]; ACT: 5.3 [95% CI, 3.4 to 7.2]) and 12 months (NACT: 6.4 [95% CI, 4.4 to 8.3]; ACT: 4.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to 6.1]). During treatment, there were some clinically meaningful differences between groups for other symptoms but not for function subscales or global health status., Conclusion: Treatment-emergent symptoms from OL were limited, generally resolving after treatment ended. OL- and PL-treated patients had similar functional scores, slowly improving during the 24 months after (N)ACT and there was no clinically meaningful persistence of fatigue severity in OL-treated patients.

A close relationship has been demonstrated between genomic complexity and clinical outcome in uterine smooth muscle tumors. We studied the genomic profiles by array-CGH of 28 fumarate hydratase deficient leiomyomas and 37 leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei (LMBN) from 64 patients. Follow-up was available for 46 patients (from three to 249 months, mean 87.3 months). All patients were alive without evidence of disease. For 51 array-CGH interpretable tumors the mean Genomic Index (GI) was 16.4 (median: 9.8; from 1 to 57.8), significantly lower than the mean GI in LMS (mean GI 51.8, p < 0.001). We described three groups: (1) a group with FH deletion (24/58) with low GI (mean GI: 11 vs. 22,4, p = 0.02), (2) a group with TP53 deletion (17/58) with higher GI (22.4 vs. 11 p = 0.02), and (3) a group without genomic events on FH or TP53 genes (17/58) (mean GI:18.3; from 1 to 57.8). Because none of these tumors recurred and none showed morphological features of LMS we concluded that GI at the cut-off of 10 was not applicable in these subtypes of LM. By integration of all those findings, a GI <10 in LMBN remains a valuable argument for benignity. Conversely, in LMBN a GI >10 or alteration in tumor suppressor genes, should not alone warrant a diagnosis of malignancy. Nine tumors were tested with Nanocind CINSARC® signature and all were classified in low risk of recurrence. We propose, based on our observations, a diagnostic approach of these challenging lesions., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Integrating telemedicine into cancer care remains a major challenge. There are little clinical evidence for teleconsultation efficacy and safety in daily oncology practice. This study as a pioneering experience, aimed to analyze patient and physician opinions regarding the implementation of telemedicine consultations, and to identify major limitations of telehealth spread in an oncology institute., Material and Methods: During COVID-19 lockdown, patients and physicians who took part to at least one video-based teleconsultation between March and May 2020, were enrolled in this observational study. All eligible patients received an anonymous online questionnaire. On the other hand, all physicians eligible to participate were asked through email to complete a questionnaire., Results: In this study, 31 physicians and 304 patients consented to participate in this study by answering the questionnaire and were included. Regarding telemedicine satisfaction, 65.8% of patients were satisfied. The lack of clinical examination was the major limitation reported by 77% of patients. Patients belonging to a high socio-professional category were statistically more dissatisfied with the relationship with their doctor (OR = 2.31 and 95% CI [1.12; 4.74])., Conclusion: This study showed promising results of incorporating video-based teleconsultations into cancer patient management. Randomized clinical trials are needed in order to accelerate the digital implementation in clinical practice.

Infection of SARS-CoV-2 among health workers (HWs) in contact with cancer patients has been a major issue since the beginning of the pandemic. We aimed to assess the serological immune status of SARS-CoV-2 infection among these HWs. A prospective cohort study was initiated in the comprehensive cancer center of the Nouvelle-Aquitaine region (NA, France). Volunteer HWs working on March 2020 without active infection or symptoms of COVID-19 completed a self-questionnaire and had a blood test at inclusion, at 3 and 12 months. Positive serological status of SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined by anti-nucleocapsid antibodies and/or IgG anti-spike antibodies, except at 12 months due to vaccine. Half of the HWs were included (N = 517) and 89% were followed for three months (N = 500) and one year (N = 462). Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 3.5% (95% CI: 1.9-5.1), 6.2% (95% CI: 4.1-8.3), and 10% (95% CI: 7.2-12.7) on June-September 2020, September 2020-January 2021, and June-October 2021, respectively. At 12 months, 93.3% had detectable antibodies with 80% vaccinated in the first three months of vaccine availability. The COVID-19-free policy of the institution, respect for barrier gestures, high and early vaccination of HWs, and low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in NA may explain the low rate of seropositivity among the HWs of the Institut Bergonié.

Background/aim: Olaparib was approved in 2014 by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as maintenance treatment for patients with breast cancer gene (BRCA)-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following the results of the Study 19. We present the results of a national real-world study on the effectiveness of olaparib in relapsed BRCA-mutated EOC patients., Patients and Methods: Patients with EOC, peritoneal, and/or fallopian-tube cancer treated with olaparib in a French Center between May 2014 and March 2017 were included. The primary end-point of the study was progression-free survival., Results: Of the 128 patients analyzed, 89 were treated according to the EMA label. The median progression-free survival was 17.0 months. The most common treatment-related toxicity was fatigue. Treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome (n=5) and a second cancer (n=1) were diagnosed., Conclusion: In this real-life setting, olaparib confirmed its efficacy and safety profile, as previously shown in clinical trials., (Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: In advanced oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors frequently stems from ESR1-mutated subclones, which might be sensitive to fulvestrant. The PADA-1 trial aimed to show the efficacy of an early change in therapy on the basis of a rising ESR1 mutation in blood (bESR1 mut ), while assessing the global safety of combination fulvestrant and palbociclib., Methods: We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial in 83 hospitals in France. Women aged at least 18 years with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were recruited and monitored for rising bESR1 mut during first-line aromatase inhibitor (2·5 mg letrozole, 1 mg anastrozole, or 25 mg exemestane, orally once per day, taken continuously) and palbociclib (125 mg orally once per day on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) therapy. Patients with newly present or increased bESR1 mut in circulating tumour DNA and no synchronous disease progression were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue with the same therapy or to switch to fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscularly on day 1 of each 28-day cycle and on day 15 of cycle 1) and palbociclib (dosing unchanged). The randomisation sequence was generated within an interactive web response system using a minimisation method (with an 80% random factor); patients were stratified according to visceral involvement (present or absent) and the time from inclusion to bESR1 mut detection (<12 months or ≥12 months). The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival from random assignment, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all randomly assigned patients), and grade 3 or worse haematological adverse events in all patients. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03079011), and is now complete., Findings: From March 22, 2017, to Jan 31, 2019, 1017 patients were included, of whom 279 (27%) developed a rising bESR1 mut and 172 (17%) were randomly assigned to treatment: 88 to switching to fulvestrant and palbociclib and 84 patients to continuing aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib. At database lock on July 31, 2021, randomly assigned patients had a median follow-up of 35·3 months (IQR 29·2-41·4) from inclusion and 26·0 months (13·8-34·3) from random assignment. Median progression-free survival from random assignment was 11·9 months (95% CI 9·1-13·6) in the fulvestrant and palbociclib group versus 5·7 months (3·9-7·5) in the aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib group (stratified HR 0·61, 0·43-0·86; p=0·0040). The most frequent grade 3 or worse haematological adverse events were neutropenia (715 [70·3%] of 1017 patients), lymphopenia (66 [6·5%]), and thrombocytopenia (20 [2·0%]). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in step 2 were neutropenia (35 [41·7%] of 84 patients in the aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib group vs 39 [44·3%] of 88 patients in the fulvestrant and palbociclib group) and lymphopenia (three [3·6%] vs four [4·5%]). 31 (3·1%) patients had grade 3 or worse serious adverse events related to treatment in the overall population. Three (1·7%) of 172 patients randomly assigned had one serious adverse event in step 2: one (1·2%) grade 4 neutropenia and one (1·2%) grade 3 fatigue among 84 patients in the aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib group, and one (1·1%) grade 4 neutropenia among 88 patients in the fulvestrant and palbociclib group. One death by pulmonary embolism in step 1 was declared as being treatment related., Interpretation: PADA-1 is the first prospective randomised trial showing that the early therapeutic targeting of bESR1 mut results in significant clinical benefit. Additionally, the original design explored in PADA-1 might help with tackling acquired resistance with new drugs in future trials., Funding: Pfizer., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests F-CB reports, outside the submitted work, grants or contracts from Novartis, Lilly, Amgen, Sanofi, Radius, Seagen, AstraZeneca, General Electric, Menarini/Stemline, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Merck, Pfizer, Prolynx, Rain Therapeutics, and Roche; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, General Electric, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Menarini/Stemline, Novartis, Pfizer, Rain Therapeutics, and Sanofi; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Lilly, Menarini/Stemline, Pfizer, Rain Therapeutics, and Sanofi; support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche; and applied for an international patent (application number PCT/EP2019/056445), filed on March 14, 2019, named: method for identifying one or more mutations in a hotspot mutation sequence. A-CH-B reports, outside the submitted work, consulting fees from AstraZeneca and Merck Sharpe & Dohme; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, AstraZeneca, Daiichi, GSK, Seagen, and Gilead; support for attending meetings or travel from Novartis, Pfizer, and Daiichi; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for MSD, AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Pfizer, Novartis, GSK, Seagen, Gilead, and Eisai. TB reports, outside the submitted work, grants or contracts from Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and SeaGen; and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Lilly, SeaGen, Roche, Novartis, and Pfizer. J-YP reports, outside the submitted work, grants or contracts from Servier and Menarini; consulting fees from Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, and MSD; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, MSD, Seagen, Novartis, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, and Amgen; support for attending meetings or travel from Roche and AstraZeneca; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Sanofi and Novartis. TdlMR reports, outside the submitted work, grants or contracts from Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, and Seagen; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Tesaro, GSK, and Seagen; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from GSK. RS reports, outside the submitted work, grants or contracts from AstraZeneca; consulting fees from GSK; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Novartis, GSK, Clovis, and AstraZeneca; and support for attending meetings or travel from Pfizer, Roche, GSK, and Bristol Myers Squibb. J-SF reports, outside the submitted work, consulting fees from Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, GSK, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, and Seagen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Lilly, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, and Seagen; and support for attending meetings or travel from Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, GSK, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, and Seagen. SL reports, outside the submitted work, grants or contracts from Novartis, Eisai, and BMS; consulting fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Astellas, Janssen, Ipsen, Roche, BMS, Daiichi, Seagen, and Pierre Fabre; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Astellas, Janssen, Ipsen, Roche, BMS, Daiichi, Seagen, and Pierre Fabre; payment for expert testimony from Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Astellas, Janssen, Ipsen, Roche, BMS, Daiichi, and Seagen; support for attending meetings or travel from Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Janssen, BMS, Daiichi, and Seagen; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from BMS. CL reports, outside the submitted work, consulting fees from MSD, Daiichi, Roche, and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Lilly; support for attending meetings or travel from Roche, Pfizer, Sandoz, Lilly, and AstraZeneca; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Roche, AstraZeneca, and Lilly. AL reports, outside the submitted work, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, MSD, and Clovis; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, MSD, and Clovis; and leadership or fiduciary role in other board for GINECO group. JG reports, outside the submitted work, support for attending meetings or travel from Lilly and Daiichi; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Daiichi and Pfizer. HV reports, outside the submitted work, grants or contracts from Eisai, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Daiichi, and Pfizer; and support for attending meetings or travel from Eisai, GSK, MSD, and Novartis. CG-T reports, outside the submitted work, grants or contracts from Pfizer; consulting fees from Pfizer; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astrazeneca, Pfizer and Novartis; and support for attending meetings or travel from MSD, Mylan, and Pfizer. BP reports, outside the submitted work, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Myriad, Pierre Fabre, and Pfizer; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, and Puma; support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre, and MSD; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Daiichi Sankyo. FA reports, outside the submitted work, reports grants or contracts from Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Novartis, and Lilly; and consulting fees from Gilead, Guardant Health, MedImmune, and Relay Therapeutics. LA reports, outside the submitted work, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche, MSD, AstraZeneca, and BMS; and support for attending meetings or travel from Roche. JL reports a Pfizer grant to his institution for carrying out this study. SD reports, outside the submitted work, grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche Genentech, Lilly, Puma, Myriad, Orion, Amgen, Sanofi, MSD, BMS, Seagen, and Taiho; consulting fees from Isis/Servier, Cellectis, Pierre Fabre, and General Electric; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Seagen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Exact Sciences, Daiichi, and Lilly; support for attending meetings or travel from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Roche Genentech; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Orion, and Rappta. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Endometrial cancer is often hormone-dependent and treated with aromatase inhibitors. The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway deregulation observed in endometrial cancer drives hormonal resistance, thus supporting the rationale of combining mTOR inhibitor with endocrine therapy., Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vistusertib in combination with anastrozole in the treatment of women with hormone receptor-positive recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer., Design, Settings, and Participants: The VICTORIA study was a multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial that accrued 75 patients with hormone receptor-positive recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer from 12 cancer centers in France in April 2016 to October 2019. After a safety run-in period, a Simon 2-stage design was used. Data analyses were performed from December 11, 2020, to March 11, 2021., Interventions: Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to oral vistusertib (125 mg twice daily 2 days per week) and oral anastrozole (1 mg daily) in the combination vistusertib with anastrozole arm (V+A arm) or oral anastrozole alone (A arm)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was serious adverse events for the safety run-in period and progression-free rate at 8 weeks (8wk-PFR)-assessed with a blinded independent central review in phase 2. The secondary end points were objective response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and incidence of adverse events., Results: Of the 75 patients who were randomized, 73 (median [range] age, 69.5 [37-88] y; all female) were treated: V+A arm, 49 patients; A arm, 24 patients. In the V+A arm, the 8wk-PFR was 67.3% (unilateral 95% CI, 54.7%) and in the A arm, 39.1% (unilateral 95% CI, 22.2%). No significant serious adverse events were reported during the safety run-in period (n = 6 in V+A arm). The overall response rate was 24.5% (95% CI, 13.3%-38.9%) in the V+A arm vs 17.4% (95% CI, 5.0%-38.8%) in the A arm. With a median follow-up of 27.7 months, median PFS was 5.2 (95% CI, 3.4-8.9) in the V+A arm and 1.9 (95% CI, 1.6-8.9) months in the A arm. Fatigue, lymphopenia, hyperglycemia, and diarrhea were the most common (grade ≥2) adverse events associated with vistusertib., Conclusions and Relevance: This multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that adding vistusertib to anastrozole improved 8wk-PFR, overall response rate, and PFS for patients with endometrial cancer and had manageable adverse events. Identification of molecular subgroups would allow for more precise selection of patients who may be most likely to experience favorable outcomes., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02730923.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the most common histologic subtype of breast cancer after invasive ductal carcinoma (i.e., no special type [NST]). ILC differs from NST in clinical presentation, site-specific metastases and response to conventional therapies. Loss of E-cadherin protein expression, due to alterations in its encoding gene CDH1, is the most frequent oncogenic event in ILC. Synthetic lethality approaches have shown promising antitumor effects of ROS1 inhibitors in models of E-cadherin-defective breast cancer in in vivo studies and provide the rationale for testing their clinical activity in patients with ILC. Entrectinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting TRK, ROS1 and ALK tyrosine kinases. Here, the authors present ROSALINE (NCT04551495), a phase II study testing neoadjuvant entrectinib and endocrine therapy in women with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early ILC.

Background: Carcinomatous meningitis (CM) is a severe complication of breast cancer. The Breast International Group (BIG) carried out a survey to describe the approach to CM internationally., Patients and Methods: A questionnaire on the management of CM was developed by the Brain Metastases Task Force of BIG and distributed to its groups, requesting one answer per group site., Results: A total of 241 sites responded, 119 from Europe, 9 from North America, 39 from Central/South America, 58 from Asia, and 16 in Australia/New Zealand, with 24.5% being general hospitals with oncology units, 44.4% university hospitals, 22.4% oncology centers, and 8.7% private hospitals. About 56.0% of sites reported seeing <5 cases annually with 60.6% reporting no increase in the number of cases of CM recently. Nearly 63.1% of sites investigate for CM when a patient has symptoms or radiological evidence, while 33.2% investigate only for symptoms. For diagnosis, 71.8% of sites required a positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology, while magnetic resonance imaging findings were sufficient in 23.7% of sites. Roughly 97.1% of sites treat CM and 51.9% also refer patients to palliative care. Intrathecal therapy is used in 41.9% of sites, mainly with methotrexate (74.3%). As many as 20 centers have a national registry for patients with breast cancer with central nervous system metastases and of those 5 have one for CM. Most (90.9%) centers would be interested in participating in a registry as well as in studies for CM, the latter preferably (62.1%) breast cancer subtype specific., Conclusions: This is the first study to map out the approach to CM from breast cancer globally. Although guidelines with level 1 evidence are lacking, there is a high degree of homogeneity in the approach to CM globally and great interest for conducting studies in this area., Competing Interests: Disclosure ER reports consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Pfizer; research funding from Novartis, Demo Pharmaceutical, Celldex, Radius Health, Tesaro, Parexel, and AnaBIOsis Pharmaceuticals; travel funding from Sanofi, Ipsen, Genesis Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, Merck, Roche, and GENEKOR. CP reports grant funding from Pfizer and Daiichi Sankyo; honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Exact sciences, Gilead, Seagen, and Eli Lilly. VM reports honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, Seagen, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Janssen-Cilag, and Gilead; playing an advisory role for Hexal, Roche, Pfizer, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Nektar, Seagen, Gilead, and Eisai; research funding from Roche, Novartis, Seagen, Pfizer, and Genentech. RB reports advisory role for Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Puma, Roche, and Seagen; lecture honoraria from Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, and Seagen; research support from Daiichi, MSD, Novartis, and Roche. GR reports research funding (institution) from AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Tesaro, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, Biovica, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi/Aventis; and patents, royalties, other intellectual property from Agendia for MammaPrint due to the collaboration on the conduct of the MINDACT trial (Institution). SPG reports honoraria from Novartis, Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, and Seagen; advisory/consultancy roles with Novartis, Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, and Seagen; research grant from Roche; travel/accommodation/expenses from Roche, Amgen, Shire, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer, Celgene, and Daiichi Sankyo. HCK reports honoraria and travel support from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Tesaro, MSD, Onkowissen, Eli Lilly, SurgVision, Exact Sciences, and Genomic Health; and Stock ownership from Theraclion and Phaon scientific. NZ is on the advisory board for Lilly, Eisai, and AstraZeneca; reports receiving honorarium from Roche, Pfizer, Eisai, and Amgen; research funding (institutional) from Pfizer, Roche, and GSK; education funding from Roche, Novartis, and Amgen (none considered relevant to the current work). MP is on the advisory boards, and has participated in educational programs and conferences for Pfizer, BMS, Novartis, Astellas, Janssen, MD Serono, Merck, Amgen, and Sanofi; reports research funding (institutional) from Astellas, Novartis, Roche, Merck, BMS, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca. RMC has received (to institution) an unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer; and research funds from MSD Ireland and Pfizer. HT reports employment or management position with Partner and Medical Director Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt; honoraria from Novartis, Roche, GSK, Seagen, Pfizer, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Daiichi, and Exact Science; consulting activities for Novartis, Roche, GSK, Seagen, Pfizer, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Daiichi, and Exact Science. AM reports advisory/consultant role, honoraria, and research grant from Lilly and Roche; advisory/consultant role for Novartis, Merck, Seagen, and Daiichi-Sankyo. LDM reports grants from Eli Lilly during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Eli Lilly, Novartis, MSD, Genomic Health, Pierre Fabre, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Seagen, Ipsen, and Gilead; personal fees and nonfinancial support from Roche, Pfizer, and Eisai, outside the submitted work. CC reports honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Genesis, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche. SO reports lecture fees, honoraria, or other fees paid by a single company or for-profit organization for the time or labor of a researcher engaged for conference attendance from Chugai, Lilly, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer. IM reports performing consultancy roles for AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, In3Bio, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; travel/conference registration activities for Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, and Novartis. ME serves on the advisory boards of Pfizer and Novartis; lecturing for Astra Zeneca (institution), but has no conflicts of interest related to this publication. KZ serves on the advisory board or performs talk for AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Exact Sciences, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, and Viatris/Mylan; unrestricted funding for organization of academic symposium from Agendia, AstraZeneca-MSD, Daiichi, Eisai, Exact Sciences, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, Viatris/Mylan, and Vifor; support for participation in international congress from AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Pierre Fabre, and Roche; is a member of steering committee of Eleanor study (Pierre Fabre); and research funding from Roche. MV reports honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, and Daiichi; consulting or advisory role for Novartis and Roche; travel funds from Roche and Pfizer. DF’s institution receives support from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Servier, Tesaro, Sanofi, and Pfizer for the conduct of clinical trials outside the submitted work. MG-G reports honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; travel/attending meetings for Pfizer, Roche, and Novartis; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca. BL reports consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, and Daiichi Sankyo. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Trabectedin has shown preclinical synergy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical models., Patients and Methods: TRAMUNE is a phase Ib study investigating the combination of trabectedin with durvalumab through a dose escalation phase and two expansion cohorts, soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and ovarian carcinoma. Trabectedin was given at three dose levels (1 mg/m2, 1.2 mg/m2, and 1.5 mg/m2) on day 1, in combination with durvalumab, 1,120 mg on day 2, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of trabectedin combined with durvalumab and the objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST 1.1. The secondary endpoints included safety, 6-month progression-free rate (PFR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and biomarker analyses., Results: A total of 40 patients were included (dose escalation, n = 9; STS cohort, n = 16; ovarian carcinoma cohort, n = 15, 80% platinum resistant/refractory). The most frequent toxicities were grade 1-2 fatigue, nausea, neutropenia, and alanine/aspartate aminotransferase increase. One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity at dose level 2. Trabectedin at 1.2 mg/m2 was selected as the RP2D. In the STS cohort, 43% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage, the ORR was 7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.2-33.9], and the 6-month PFR was 28.6% (95% CI, 8.4-58.1). In the ovarian carcinoma cohort, 43% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage, the ORR was 21.4% (95% CI, 4.7-50.8), and the 6-month PFR was 42.9% (95% CI, 17.7-71.1). Baseline levels of programmed death-ligand 1 expression and CD8-positive T-cell infiltrates were associated with PFS in patients with ovarian carcinoma., Conclusions: Combining trabectedin and durvalumab is manageable. Promising activity is observed in patients with platinum-refractory ovarian carcinoma. See related commentary by Digklia et al., p. 1745., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Giri is supported in part by the Walter B. Frommeyer Fellowship in Investigative Medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and reports receiving research funding from Carevive Systems and Pack Health and honoraria from Carevive Systems. Dr. Subbiah is supported by the Andrew Sabin Family Foundation Fellowship and the American Cancer Society (Clinician Scientist Development Grant).

In France, cancer is the leading cause of death. Its incidence is increasing due to the growing population and longer life expectancy. Although older adults represent most new cases, they remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Their prognosis is often worse due to delayed diagnosis and multimorbidities. Geriatric oncology has made great strides worldwide, highlighted by important studies implementing geriatric assessment in clinical research and supported by the successive national cancer plans. This paper reviews the most important actions taken in France during the last decade to improve the management of older patients with cancer., Competing Interests: The authors state no conflicts of interest regarding this publication., (© the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience.)

Background: The optimal threshold of surgical margins for breast malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) and the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were investigated., Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter nationwide retrospective study of all MPT cases with central pathological review within the French Sarcoma Group. Endpoints were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) rates., Results: Overall, 212 patients were included in the study. All non-metastatic patients underwent primary surgical treatment, including 58.6% of conservative surgeries. An R0 resection was achieved in 117 patients (59.4%: 26.9% of patients with 1-2 mm margins, 12.2% of patients with 3-7 mm margins, 20.3% of patients with ≥ 8 mm margins). Ninety-four patients (45%) underwent a second surgery (SS) to obtain R0 margins, with a final mastectomy rate of 72.6%. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were performed in 91 (43.1%) and 23 patients (10.9%), respectively, but were not associated with better outcomes. Mastectomy was significantly associated with better LRFS (p < 0.001). Margins of 0, 1, or 2 mm with SS were associated with better MFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.3, p = 0.005) and OS (HR 0.32, p = 0.005) compared with margins of 0-1-2 mm without SS. Wider margins (> 8 mm) were not superior to margins of 3-7 mm (3-7 mm vs. > 8 mm; HR 0.81, p = 0.69). Age (HR 2.14, p = 0.038) and tumor necrosis (HR 1.96, p = 0.047) were found to be poor prognostic factors and were associated with MFS., Conclusions: This study suggests that 3 mm margins are necessary and sufficient for surgical management of MPTs, and emphasizes the importance of SS to obtain clear margins in case of 0-1-2 mm margins. No impact of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy was detected in this study.

Background: Metastatic phyllodes tumors have poor prognosis with median overall survival of 11.5 months. The objective of this study is to identify prognostic factors and the best options for management of metastatic malignant phyllode tumors (MMPTs)., Patients and Methods: A multicentric retrospective study, including cases of MMPT from 10 sarcoma centers, was conducted. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS), and the secondary end-point was the clinical benefit of chemotherapy (CBCT) rate., Results: 51 MMPT patients were included. Median time from diagnosis to metastatic recurrence was 13 months. Management of MMPT consisted in surgery of the metastatic disease for 16 patients (31.3%), radiation therapy of the metastatic disease for 15 patients (31.9%), and chemotherapy for 37 patients (72.5%). Median follow-up was 62.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 31-80 months]. Median OS was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.5-18.7 months). On multivariate analysis, two or more metastatic sites [hazard ratio (HR) 2.81, 95% CI 1.27-6.19; p = 0.01] and surgery of metastasis (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.78; p = 0.01) were independently associated with OS. The CBCT rate was 31.4% and 16.7% for the first and second lines. Polychemotherapy was not superior to single-agent therapy. Alkylating-agent-based chemotherapy, possibly associated with anthracyclines, was associated with a better CBCT rate than anthracyclines alone (p = 0.049)., Conclusions: The results of this study emphasize the impact of the number of metastatic sites on survival of MMPT patients and the leading role of metastasis surgery in MMPT management. If systemic therapy is used, it should include alkylating agents, which are associated with a better clinical benefit.

Objective: The French national rare gynecological tumor network has been established to improve the quality of care through offering expertise in double reading histological diagnosis, reviewing cases and guiding management of these tumors through specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards and online clinical guidelines (www.ovaire-rare.com). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the development and implementation of this network by assessing the conformity of medical practice with the guidelines concerning the granulosa cell tumors (GCTs)., Methods: This is a French nationwide study, including 463 patients (out of the 639 identified patients) with a definitive diagnosis of GCT between 2011 and 2016. Surgical practices were analyzed for conformity with the current guidelines (www.ovaire-rare.org). Medical records, surgical and pathological reports were systematically analyzed. Total conformity was defined by a conservative (unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) or radical surgery (hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) including surgical staging (omentectomy, peritoneal biopsies and peritoneal cytology) according to the FIGO stage. Partial conformity referred to a conservative or radical surgery without surgical staging and non-conformity was defined as a non-optimal surgery as recommended by the guidelines., Results: Median age at diagnosis was 49 years old (range 10-89). The median size of tumor was 94 mm (range 5-400). Radical surgery was performed in 240 patients (52%); while a fertility-sparing surgery was performed in 98 cases (21%). A surgical staging was performed in 76 cases (16%) and an evaluation of the endometrium in 289 cases (62%). Surgery was fully compliant with the guidelines in 65 patients (14%), partially compliant in 213 patients (46%), non-compliant in 137 patients (30%) and not assessable in 48 cases (10%). A statistically significant difference for compliance was observed in restaging surgery (p < 0,001), radical surgery (p = 0,017) and the period (before or after) of the implementation of the network (p < 0,001). Survival analyses did not allow us to demonstrate a significant difference in overall survival nor in PFS although there was a trend in favor of optimal surgery compared to incomplete/non optimal surgery., Conclusion: Surgical management's conformity to the guidelines increases over time from 2011 to 2016. According to this study, the implementation of a national network dedicated to rare gynecologic tumors seems to significantly improve the surgical management of the patients with ovarian granulosa cell tumors., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None declared., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Uterine leiomyosarcoma, which accounts for 7% of all soft-tissue sarcomas and 1%-3% of all uterine malignancies, is an aggressive tumor responsible for a significant proportion of uterine cancer-related deaths. While Federation Internationale des Gynaecologistes et Obstetristes (FIGO) stage is the most important prognostic factor, metastatic and relapse rates at stage I exceed 50% so it is currently impossible to predict the clinical outcome of stage I leiomyosarcomas. In 2010, our team published a transcriptomic signature composed of 67 genes related to chromosome biogenesis, mitosis control, and chromosome segregation. It has demonstrated its prognostic value in many cancer types and was recently successfully applied to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sarcomas by NanoCind on NanoString technology, making another step forward toward its use in routine practice., Experimental Design: Sixty uterine leiomyosarcomas at any stage, including 40 localized in the uterus (stage I), were analyzed with the NanoCind (CINSARC with NanoString) signature. Its prognostic value was evaluated for overall survival and relapse-free survival and compared in multivariate analysis with other prognostic markers like FIGO staging and genomic index., Results: The NanoCind signature was able to split the heterogeneous group of uterine leiomyosarcomas of any stage including stage I into two distinct groups with different relapse-free survival and overall survival. These results were validated on an independent cohort of uterine leiomyosarcomas in The Cancer Genome Atlas consortium., Conclusions: The NanoCind signature is a powerful prognosticator that outperforms FIGO staging and the genomic index. The CINSARC signature is platform independent and "ready to use" and should now be used for randomization in future therapeutic trials., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Clinical experience suggests that functional decline (FD) during treatment may have a major adverse impact on outcome. Geriatric assessment of older patients before cancer treatment is usually based on use of a screening tool (such as G8) followed by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). However, many oncology teams cannot implement geriatric oncology management due to non-availability of geriatricians. Consequently, we decided to evaluate whether a procedure using G8 and routinely available factors could help oncologists foresee the outcome in patients ≥70: we firstly evaluated whether functional decline is a determinant of early death, then searched for predictors of early functional decline (measured before initiation of the second cycle of chemotherapy), including G8 but voluntarilly excluding CGA., Methods: We tested the value of clinical, biological factors and early FD to predict early death on a cohort of 292 patients (≥70 years) treated with first-line chemotherapy. We then used a logistic regression model to search for pretreatment predictors of FD, including the same factors and G8 but excluding CGA., Results: FD occurred in 48 patients. In multivariate analyses, early FD (OR = 4.13, 95% CI [1.89; 9.04], p < .01), disease extension (OR = 4.55, 95% CI [1.96; 10.57]; p < .01), and being male (OR = 2.59, 95% CI [1.12; 5.97], p = .02) were significant prognostic factors for early death; G8 was the only significant factor associated with FD (OR = 4.38, 95% CI [1.28; 14.92], p = .018)., Conclusions: FD has an important prognostic significance in patients ≥70 treated with chemotherapy, and G8 predicts for its occurrence. These data reinforce the routine use of G8 in the management of these patients., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mesenchymal neoplasms of the uterus (corpus and cervix) encompass a heterogeneous group of tumors with differing morphologies, immunophenotypes and molecular alterations. With the advent of modern molecular techniques, such as next generation sequencing, newly defined genetic abnormalities are being reported in this group of neoplasms. Herein we report the clinicopathological and molecular features of a series of 13 spindle cell sarcomas of the uterus and vagina (10 cervix, 2 uterine corpus, 1 vagina) with morphology resembling fibrosarcoma. After targeted RNA-sequencing, dual FISH fusion and array-CGH analysis, 7 of 13 tumors exhibited NTRK rearrangements (6 TPM3-NTRK1 and 1 EML4-NTRK3) and 3 a COL1A1-PDGFB fusion; in the other 3 neoplasms, all of which were positive with S100 (2 diffuse, 1 focal), we identified no rearrangement. All the NTRK fusion-positive sarcomas were located in the cervix and exhibited diffuse staining with Trk while all the other neoplasms were negative. CD34 was diffusely positive in all 3 of the COL1A1-PDGFB fusion sarcomas. The latter molecular abnormality is identical to that commonly found in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and has not been reported previously in uterine mesenchymal neoplasms. We suggest that uterine sarcomas with a morphology resembling fibrosarcoma (and in which leiomyosarcoma and the known molecularly confirmed high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas have been excluded) can be divided into 3 groups:- an NTRK fusion group, a COL1A1-PDGFB fusion group and a group containing neither of these molecular abnormalities which, on the basis of positive staining with S100, could be tentatively classified as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, although additional molecular studies may identify specific genetic alterations necessitating a nomenclature change. We suggest a diagnostic algorithm when reporting such neoplasms. Identification of these newly described fusion-associated sarcomas is important given the potential for targeted treatments.

Mutations of CTNNB1 have been implicated in tumorigenesis in many organs. However, tumors harboring a CTNNB1 translocation are extremely rare and this translocation has never been reported in a uterine mesenchymal neoplasm. We report a novel translocation t(2;3)(p25;p22) involving the GREB1 (intron 8) and CTNNB1 (exon 3) in a uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumor (UTROSCT), which exhibited extrauterine metastasis. The translocation detected by RNA-sequencing was validated by RT-PCR, and resulted in nuclear expression of β-catenin. Juxtapositioning with GREB1, which is overexpressed in response to estrogens, resulted in overexpression of a truncated and hypophosphorylated nuclear β-catenin in the primary and recurrent tumors. This accumulation of nuclear β-catenin results in a constitutive activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway with a major oncogenic effect. The CTNNB1 gene fusion, promoted by an estrogen-responsive gene (GREB1), could be a potential driver of tumorigenesis in this case and a therapeutic target with adapted inhibitors. RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry performed on 11 additional UTROSCTs showed no CTNNB1 fusion transcript or nuclear β-catenin immunoreactivity., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

In 2005, two adjuvant trials revolutionised breast cancer treatment demonstrating a 50% reduction in relapses when trastuzumab was added to adjuvant chemotherapy. In order to improve further on these results three large phase III trials were conducted. ALTTO trial evaluated lapatinib. This trial was negative and lapatinib was quite toxic. ExteNET trial evaluated neratinib in patients who already had completed adjuvant treatment with trastuzumab. Neratinib reduced the risk of relapse by 27% and the drug is FDA approved. However 40% of patients experienced grade 3 diarrhoea and this toxicity profile will be an issue in daily practice. APHINITY trial evaluated a combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab. Pertuzumab reduced the risk of relapse by 19% with a good toxicity profile. However the absolute invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) benefit at 4 years was only 1.7%. Despite this modest absolute benefit we believe that pertuzumab should be added to trastuzumab at least in two indications: first, in patients with node positive breast cancer, in whom the absolute IDFS benefit is 3.2% and qualify for a high clinical benefit based on ESMO magnitude of clinical benefit scale; second, in patients suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this group, the absolute IDFS benefit could be estimated as high as 7% (starting pertuzumab in the neoadjuvant setting and following it in the adjuvant setting up to a total of 18 injections). Our arguments are developed in this viewpoint. Pertuzumab is approved in these two indications by FDA and EMA., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The diagnosis of a uterine smooth muscle lesion is, in the majority of cases, straightforward. However, in a small number of cases, the morphological criteria used in such lesions cannot differentiate with certainty a benign from a malignant lesion and a diagnosis of smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) is made. Uterine leiomyosarcomas are often easy to diagnose but it is difficult or even impossible to identify a prognostic factor at the moment of the diagnosis with the exception of the stage. We hypothesize, for uterine smooth muscle lesions, that there is a gradient of genomic complexity that correlates to outcome. We first tested this hypothesis on STUMP lesions in a previous study and demonstrated that this 'gray category' could be split according to genomic index into two groups. A benign group, with a low to moderate alteration rate without recurrence and a malignant group, with a highly rearranged profile akin to uterine leiomyosarcomas. Here, we analyzed a large series of 77 uterine smooth muscle lesions (from 76 patients) morphologically classified as 19 leiomyomas, 14 STUMP and 44 leiomyosarcomas with clinicopathological and genomic correlations. We confirmed that genomic index with a cut-off=10 is a predictor of recurrence (P<0.0001) and with a cut-off=35 is a marker for poor overall survival (P=0.035). For the tumors confined to the uterus, stage as a prognostic factor was not useful in survival prediction. At stage I, among the tumors reclassified as molecular leiomyosarcomas (ie, genomic index ≥10), the poor prognostic markers were: 5p gain (overall survival P=0.0008), genomic index at cut-off=35 (overall survival P=0.0193), 13p loss including RB1 (overall survival P=0.0096) and 17p gain including MYOCD gain (overall survival P=0.0425). Based on these findings (and the feasibility of genomic profiling by array-comparative genomic hybridization), genomic index, 5p and 17p gains prognostic value could be evaluated in future prospective chemotherapy trials.

A genomic index (GI) tool using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on tumor cells has emerged as independent prognostic factor associated with the risk of metastatic relapse in synovial sarcoma (SS). The aim was to assess GI in pediatric patients with SS, to determine its value as a prognostic factor. All pediatric/adolescent/young adults' (<25 years) with localized SS prospectively included in the European EpSSG-NRSTS05 protocol with a contributive aCGH were selected. Definition of GI was A 2 /C, where A is the total number of alterations (segmental gains and losses) and C is the number of involved chromosomes on aCGH results. GI 1 group corresponds to cases with no copy number alterations (flat profile, GI = 0) and GI 2 group cases with at least one or more copy number alterations (rearranged profile; GI ≥ 1). Samples were available from 61 patients. The median age of the cohort was 13 years (range: 4-24). Overall, 55.7% were GI 1 group, and 44.3% GI 2 . After a median follow-up of 62 months (range: 0.1-112), 10 tumor events occurred and five patients died. Respectively, for GI 1 versus GI 2 groups, five-year event-free survival (EFS) was 93.8 ± 4.2% versus 64.9 ± 10.1% (P < 0.006) and five-year Metastatic-Free Survival (MFS) 93.8 ± 4.2% versus 72.9 ± 9.5% (P < 0.04). In multivariate analysis, GI status as adjusted for IRS group, patient age, site, and tumor size remain independent prognostic for EFS with a relative risk (RR) of 6.4 [1.3-31.9] (P < 0.01) and RR for MFS is 4.8 [0.9-25.7] (P < 0.05). Genomic complexity evaluated through GI may explain the metastatic behavior of pediatric SS., (© 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used for the targeted treatment of solid cancers. TKIs produce a variable incidence of liver adverse events (5-25%) which can progress to severe liver injury in a minority of patients if treatment is maintained despite ongoing injury. This risk requires careful patient management to maintain treatment benefit without harm. This review highlights the various mechanisms of idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity, the formation of reactive metabolites and how this leads to toxicity. These critical events depend of the drug-specific characteristics of each TKI and the patient risk factors, especially genetic characterization. With improved understanding of the mechanisms leading to hepatotoxicity, several strategies have been adopted to prevent or treat this side effect. Recommendations on liver function liver test monitoring have been proposed according to each TKI., (Copyright © 2018 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including targeting programmed cell death 1, programmed cell death ligand 1, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 pathways, are a new type of cancer treatment. This approach of targeting the immune system has demonstrated dramatic efficacy for several cancers, and various drugs have been approved by health authorities and are used in clinical practice. Elderly patients (≥65 years) represent most of the cancers diagnosed and deaths by age group, with an increase expected over the next decade. However, this subgroup of patients is under-represented in clinical trials. Ageing is also associated with a decrease in the effectiveness of the immune system and in alterations to it. Few specific trials have been carried out for immunotherapy in elderly people, with most patients considered to be fit. In this review, we discuss the impact of ageing and immunosenescence on immune system functions, and we assess the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients, principally from the data of pivotal clinical trials with subgroup analysis. Tolerance in elderly patients seems similar to younger people, but efficacy seems different between younger and elderly patients according to the type of cancer, some showing no difference and others less efficacy in the elderly subgroup. However, the numbers in elderly groups are small and more investigation is needed, with specific clinical trials for elderly cancer patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The use of targeted therapy (TT) has radically changed the outcome of various cancers and introduces the era of personalised medicine. Elderly patients (≥65 years) represent the majority of cancer diagnoses and deaths by age group with an increase expected over the next decade. This group of patients is heterogeneous with three categories of patients: fit, vulnerable and frail, with specific treatment for each subgroup. In this review, we assess safety and efficacy of TT in elderly patients, principally from data of pivotal clinical trials with subgroup analysis, but elderly people represented a small percentage of the total number of patients. Few specific trials have been carried out for TT in elderly people with most patients considered to be fit. However, tolerance and efficacy of TT in elderly patients seems similar to that for younger patients, with an increase in incidence of specific adverse events in elderly patients for selected TTs. An adapted geriatric selection and strict monitoring could help to decrease toxicity, and specific clinical trials for elderly cancer patients would be useful., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the general geriatric population, programs linking geriatric evaluation with interventions are effective for improving functional status and survival of the patients. Whether or not these interventions improve health related quality of life (HRQoL) or overall survival (OS) in older patients with cancer is not yet clear. Indeed, randomized data on the effect of such interventions on survival and HRQoL are rare and conflicting. We describe the rationale and design of a phase III multicenter trial aimed at assessing the efficacy of geriatric intervention in the management of elderly patients with cancer., Methods/design: Approximately 1200 patients, 70 years and older, considered in need of a geriatric intervention based on the G8 screening tool will be randomized into two intervention arms. The 'Usual-care' arm involves standard oncological care based on pre-defined oncological protocols. In addition to the standard oncological care, the 'Case-management' arm involves a multidimensional geriatric assessment and interventions tailored for the patient. Efficacy will be assessed using a co-primary endpoint encompassing OS and HRQoL., Discussion: This trial has been designed to assess whether focused geriatric case management can either improve OS or HRQoL in elderly cancer patients considered in need of geriatric assessment., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02704832 .

Background: Since the publication of the Bolero-2 trial, everolimus has entered the routine care for advanced endocrine resistant luminal breast cancer (BC). We evaluated our practice 2 years after the French marketing authorization (July 2012)., Methods: One hundred and twenty three consecutive patients were treated with everolimus combined with endocrine treatment in two French Cancer Centers. All patients had luminal (ER positive, HER2 negative) BC and had been previously treated with endocrine therapy for advanced disease., Results: Median age at initiation of everolimus was 63 y (36-84). Median delay from cancer diagnosis to everolimus was 12.6 y (1.3-34.8). Grade 2 or 3 side effects were experienced by 49.6% and 32.5% of the patients, respectively. Most frequent side effects were grade 2/3 mucositis (32.6%/11.2%), grade 1/2 decreased appetite (24.4%/13.8%), and grade 1/2 rash (28.5%/13.8%). At a median follow up of 10 months, median progression free survival was 9 months (0.4-26+), and median overall survival was 21 months (0.4-26+)., Conclusions: In routine practice everolimus efficacy appears very close to the Bolero-2 results, although in more heavily pretreated patients. Everolimus based therapy appears feasible and side effects are similar to those previously reported. These data support the use of everolimus in daily practice., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to assess the histological response after chemotherapy on bladder carcinoma., Methods: From 2008 to 2010, 12 patients presenting localized urothelial carcinoma of the bladder were prospectively evaluated by DCE-MR imaging before and after two courses of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Size and thickness of tumours were measured. Relative enhancement at the arterial (rSI35s) and venous phases (rSI80s) of each tumour was obtained. Histological response was assessed and outcomes were recorded., Results: Histological examination after neoadjuvant chemotherapy concluded as pathological complete response (pCR) for 6 out of 12 patients. Five patients developed recurrences (4/6 no pCR and 1/6 pCR). Significant differences, between before and after treatment, were found for patients with complete pathological response after chemotherapy for all MR quantitative values. Tumours decreased in size and thickness (both P=0.03). After treatment, rSI80s was significantly different between pCR and non-pCR patients (P=0.04) with a cut-off value of 40%. For this cut-off, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 83.33%. Similar recurrence free survivals were obtained if applying the MR cut-off value or the histopathological findings., Conclusion: Our results suggest that DCE-MR imaging may be a useful biomarker for patients with localized bladder carcinoma, improving selection before surgery., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The role of molecular signatures in the adjuvant management of breast cancer remains a debated topic. Discussions should take into account the level of scientific validation, the impact on practice, the expected benefits and financing issues. This article presents the limits to be clarified before using commercial molecular signatures., (Copyright © 2015 Société Françise du Cancer. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neoadjuvant trials conducted using a double HER2 blockade with lapatinib and trastuzumab, combined with different paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy regimens, have shown high pathological complete response (pCR) rates, but at the cost of important toxicity. We hypothesised that this toxicity might be due to a specific interaction between paclitaxel and lapatinib. This trial assesses the toxicity and activity of the combination of docetaxel with lapatinib and trastuzumab., Patients and Methods: Patients with stage IIA to IIIC HER2-positive breast cancer received six cycles of chemotherapy (three cycles of docetaxel followed by three cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide). They were randomised 1 : 1 : 1 to receive during the first three cycles either lapatinib (1000 mg orally daily), trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg weekly), or trastuzumab + lapatinib at the same dose. The primary end point was pCR rate defined as ypT0/is. Secondary end points included safety and toxicity. pCR rate defined as ypT0/is ypN0 was assessed as an exploratory analysis. In June 2012, arm A was closed for futility based on the results from other studies., Results: From October 2010 to January 2013, 128 patients were included in 14 centres. The percentage of the 122 assessable patients with pCR in the breast, and pCR in the breast and nodes, was numerically highest in the lapatinib + trastuzumab group (60% and 56%, respectively), intermediate in the trastuzumab group (52% and 52%), and lowest in the lapatinib group (46% and 36%). Frequency (%) of the most common grade 3-4 toxicities in the lapatinib /trastuzumab/lapatinib + trastuzumab arms were: febrile neutropenia 23/15/10, diarrhoea 9/2/18, infection (other) 9/4/8, and hepatic toxicity 0/2/8., Conclusions: This study demonstrates a numerically modest pCR rate increase with double anti-HER2 blockade plus chemotherapy, but suggests that the use of docetaxel rather than paclitaxel may not reduce toxicity., Clinicaltrialsgov: NCT00450892., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: Although achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer predicts a better outcome, some patients still relapse. The objectives of this study were to describe the types of events in this group of patients and to identify predictive factors for relapse., Methods: Patients with large operable or locally advanced breast cancers (T4d tumours were excluded) were randomised to receive either six cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy or three cycles of docetaxel followed by three cycles of eprirubicin/docetaxel. pCR was defined as no evidence of residual invasive cancer (or very few scattered tumour cells) in the primary tumour and axillary lymph nodes at surgery. Two Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors of relapse: one for recurrence-free interval (RFI) and one for distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI)., Results: Out of 283 eligible patients who achieved a pCR, 40 (14.1%) and 28 (9.9%) presented an event of interest for the RFI and DRFI analyses, respectively. Five-year RFI, DRFI and overall survival (OS) were 85.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 80.1-89.3), 89.6% (95% CI, 85.0-92.9) and 91.9% (95% CI, 87.2-94.9), respectively. No predictors for RFI after pCR were identified. For DRFI, tumour size was the only predictor: Hazard ratio (HR) T3 versus T1-2=3.62 (95% CI, 1.66-7.89); HR T4 versus T1-2: HR, 2.80 (95% CI, 0.62-12.64) p=0.0048., Conclusion: In this study, clinical tumour size emerged as the only predictor for DRFI after pCR, with T3 and T4 tumours having an increased risk for distant recurrence compared to T1-2 tumours., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is an aggressive soft-tissue tumor. Despite being considered as a chemosensitive disease, the real impact of perioperative chemotherapy on metastasis-free survival (MFS) is controversial. We have shown that metastatic relapse of SS is strongly associated with genomic complexity. There are no data regarding the potential correlation between genomic complexity and response to chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: The study population included 65 SS patients diagnosed between 1991 and 2013 and with available tissue material. Genomic profiling was carried out by using array-CGH. Forty-five SS out of the 65 patients were treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline/ifosfamide-based chemotherapy. Radiological response was assessed according to RECIST criteria. Histological response was defined by the percentage of recognizable tumor cells on the surgical specimen., Results: Genomic complexity was significantly associated with MFS. However, there was no statistically significant association between radiological or histological response and genomic complexity., Conclusion: The absence of significant association between response to chemotherapy and genomic complexity suggests that the prognostic value of chromosome instability in SS is independent of response to chemotherapy; mechanisms leading to metastatic relapse of SS are intrinsic to the biology of the tumor and current cytotoxic drugs are only poorly efficient to prevent it., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: To determine factors associated with early functional decline during first-line chemotherapy in older patients., Patients and Methods: Patients age ≥ 70 years receiving first-line chemotherapy for cancer were prospectively considered for inclusion across 12 centers in France. Functional decline was defined as a decrease of ≥ 0.5 points on the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale between the beginning of chemotherapy and the second cycle. Factors associated with functional decline were sought from pretreatment abbreviated comprehensive geriatric assessment, including ADL, Instrumental ADL (IADL), Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15), and Timed Get Up and Go (GUG) test, and from comorbidities (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatrics), MAX2 index, and baseline biologic and clinical information., Results: Of 364 included patients, 50 experienced functional decline (16.7%; median, 0.5 points). Abnormal preadmission performance status, IADL, GDS15, MMSE, GUG, and MNA were associated with increased likelihood of functional decline (univariate analysis). In the multivariate model adjusted for baseline ADL and MAX2 index, high baseline GDS (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.09 to 4.30; P = .03) and low IADL scores (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.06 to 7.79; P = .04) were independently associated with increased risk of functional decline., Conclusion: Our results outline associations between baseline depression, instrumental dependencies, and early functional decline during chemotherapy for older patients. ADL should be sequentially evaluated early during treatment. Baseline evaluation of GDS15 and IADL may be proposed to anticipate this event.