Search

Background and Objectives: Patients with advanced head and neck tumors require salvage surgery as a last resort. These extensive surgeries pose the challenge of complex reconstructions. The head and neck surgeon undertaking such complex cases needs to master different flaps. The team managing these patients needs input from various specialists, along with otorhinolaryngologists, plastic surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, vascular surgeons, experienced radiologists, dedicated pathologists, oncologists and radiation therapists. We focus on the optimum solution between oncologic resections and the future quality of life of patients and overall survival. Each complex case requires a personalized medicine approach. This scoping review aims to assess the efficacy and outcomes of complex reconstructions using various flaps for head and neck tumors, with a focus on free flaps and emerging techniques. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, resulting in the inclusion of 44 articles that met the predefined criteria in the last 10 years. Results: The included studies encompassed diverse patient populations and evaluated various surgical techniques, outcomes, complications, and advancements in head and neck reconstruction. The review identified a variety of flaps utilized in head and neck tumor reconstruction, including free flaps such as the radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, scapular tip, and myocutaneous flaps, among others. The success rates for free flap reconstructions ranged from 85% to 100%, with notable variations attributed to patient selection, tumor characteristics, and surgical expertise. Conclusions: Complications such as flap necrosis, infection, hematoma, and donor site morbidity were documented across studies, highlighting the importance of meticulous surgical planning and postoperative care. Furthermore, the review revealed emerging techniques such as computer-aided design, virtual surgery, stereolithographic models, customized implants, tissue engineering, and allotransplants, offering promising reconstructive armamentarium. Advances in surgical techniques and emerging technologies hold promise for further enhancing reconstructive outcomes, minimizing morbidity, and improving patient quality of life.

Laryngeal cancer is an important oncological entity in which prognosis depends on the establishment of appropriate preventive and diagnostic measures, especially in high-risk populations. We present a retrospective two-year study (January 2021 to December 2022) with 152 patients diagnosed with laryngeal cancer from a tertiary hospital in Romania. The average age of the patients was 62 years old for both sexes, with a range from 44 to 83 years. The most frequent symptom was dysphonia with or without dyspnea in 142 cases (93.42%), followed by dyspnea alone in nine patients (5.92%) and dysphagia in one case (0.66%). Surgical treatment in this study consisted of partial laryngectomy (CO 2 laser transoral tumor ablation, supraglottic horizontal laryngectomy or hemilaryngectomy), or total laryngectomy. The main treatment was total laryngectomy (63%). For the eight patients with initial organ preservation treatment, the average time of recurrence was about two-and-a-half years. For the four patients who underwent a total circular pharyngo-laryngectomy, the upper digestive tract needed to be rebuilt with a salivary bypass tube or with a tubed myocutaneous flap from the major pectoralis muscle. One strong point is characteristic of the study group in gathering patients with advanced stages of laryngeal carcinoma candidates for salvage surgery and extended reconstruction methods. The development of new prevention protocols is mandatory in Eastern European countries.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) is a common malignancy often diagnosed in the advanced stage with a complex negative influence on the patient's quality of life (QoL). Given its multi-modal treatment, the first step is to adequately balance the needs of the patient, and the second step includes the consultations, interventions, and care provided by the medical team, with the purpose of improving the overall management of the HNSCC. Current attempts to develop and validate quality-of-life instruments specific to cancers of the head and neck have been reported, and certain questionnaires are now available. We performed a retrospective study in a tertiary centre, involving 89 patients who survived 3 years after HNSCC surgery. A patient-related outcome measurement was made using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 instruments to assess QoL at admission and 3 years after treatment. The 3-year survivors reported an overall improvement in QoL compared with those in the pre-treatment period. The unique details of head and neck cancer treatments outline the importance of considering the characteristics of the patient population in quality-of-life research and also identify how quality-of-life data can contribute to the care provided by the multi-disciplinary team involved in a patient's follow-up., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.