Search

It is important to assert that technology has been substantially modifying labor relations and, an example of this is teleworking, which was duly regulated in the Consolidation of Labor Laws (CLT) through the 2017 Labor Reform. the pandemic, the requirements became more flexible for the implementation of this type of work. This measure proved to be necessary, since due to the pandemic scenario that spread in Brazil due to Covid-19, sanitary measures were imposed by the Government and, among them, social isolation in order to reduce the risk of contagion, which instigated many companies to adhere to this regime with the aim of continuing their activities at this delicate time. In view of this, this scientific research aims to demonstrate the easing of the rules regarding telework, in addition to the impacts caused in the lives of workers, especially the disadvantages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Law Studies Journal / Revista Novos Estudos Juridicos is the property of Novos Estudos Juridicos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Opinião Jurídica is the property of Revista Opiniao Juridica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The objective is to analyze whether the Brazilian Labor Law Reform - Law 13.467/2017 - was drafted in accordance with the provisions of the 1988 Constitution or, if it is unconstitutional. For that, five articles of the new law were selected, that have generated discussion regarding their unconstitutionality, and it was analyzed whether those articles respects what the 1988 Constitution provides. As noted, the Labor Reform has unconstitutional provisions because it violates the following constitutional rights: (i) access to justice; (ii) benefit regarding free legal aid; (iii) the right of action; (iv) the right to have a job; (v) the right to have a salary; (vi) the right to have a job protection; etc. As possible alternatives to solve the problem of the unconstitutionality, it was briefly discussed two main methods of constitutionality control (concentrated and diffuse) to attack the validity of the norms of the Labor Reform. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Jurídica (0103-3506) is the property of Revista Juridica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Jurídica (0103-3506) is the property of Revista Juridica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)