Search

PURPOSE Universal cancer peptide–based vaccine (UCPVax) is a therapeutic vaccine composed of two highly selected helper peptides to induce CD4+ T helper-1 response directed against telomerase. This phase Ib/IIa trial was designed to test the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a three-dose schedule in patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with refractory NSCLC were assigned to receive three vaccination doses of UCPVax (0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, and 1 mg) using a Bayesian-based phase Ib followed by phase IIa de-escalating design. The primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity and immune response after three first doses of vaccine. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival at 1 year. RESULTS A total of 59 patients received UCPVax; 95% had three prior lines of systemic therapy. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 15 patients treated in phase Ib. The maximum tolerated dose was 1 mg. Fifty-one patients were eligible for phase IIa. The third and sixth dose of UCPVax induced specific CD4+ T helper 1 response in 56% and 87.2% of patients, respectively, with no difference between three dose levels. Twenty-one (39%) patients achieved disease control (stable disease, n = 20; complete response, n = 1). The 1-year OS was 34.1% (95% CI, 23.1 to 50.4), and the median OS was 9.7 months, with no significant difference between dose levels. The 1-year progression-free survival and the median OS were 17.2% (95% CI, 7.8 to 38.3) and 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.7 to 16.7) in immune responders ( P = .015) and 4.5% (95% CI, 0.7 to 30.8) and 5.6 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 10) in nonresponders ( P = .005), respectively. CONCLUSION UCPVax was highly immunogenic and safe and provide interesting 1-year OS rate in heavily pretreated advanced NSCLC.

Background Thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors (SMARCA4-UT) are aggressive neoplasms. Data linking BAF alterations with tumor microenvironment (TME) and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are contradictory. The TME of SMARCA4-UT and their response to ICI are unknown. Materials and Methods Patients diagnosed with SMARCA4-UT in our institution were included. Immunostainings for tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS), immune cell markers, and checkpoints were assessed. Validation was performed using an independent transcriptome dataset including SMARCA4-UT, non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with/without SMARCA4 mutations, and unclassified thoracic sarcomas (UTS). CXCL9 and PD-L1 expressions were assessed in NSCLC and thoracic fibroblast cell lines, with/without SMARCA4 knockdown, treated with/without interferon gamma. Results Nine patients were identified. All samples but one showed no TLS, consistent with an immune desert TME phenotype. Four patients received ICI as part of their treatment, but the only one who responded, had a tumor with a TLS and immune-rich TME. Unsupervised clustering of the validation cohort using immune cell scores identified 2 clusters associated with cell ontogeny and immunity (cluster 1 enriched for NSCLC independently of SMARCA4 status (n = 9/10; P = .001); cluster 2 enriched for SMARCA4-UT (n = 11/12; P = .005) and UTS (n = 5/5; P = .0005). SMARCA4 loss-of-function experiments revealed interferon-induced upregulation of CXCL9 and PD-L1 expression in the NSCLC cell line with no effect on the thoracic fibroblast cell line. Conclusion SMARCA4-UT mainly have an immune desert TME with limited efficacy to ICI. TME of SMARCA4-driven tumors varies according to the cell of origin questioning the interplay between BAF alterations, cell ontogeny and immunity.

The therapeutic algorithm of lung cancer has recently been revolutionized by the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, an objective and durable response rate remains low with those recent therapies and some patients even experience severe adverse events. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers are therefore needed in order to select patients who will respond. Nowadays, the only validated biomarker is the PD-L1 expression, but its predictive value remains imperfect, and it does not offer any certainty of a sustained response to treatment. With recent progresses in molecular biology, genome sequencing techniques, and the understanding of the immune microenvironment of the tumor and its host, new molecular features have been highlighted. There are evidence in favor of the positive predictive value of the tumor mutational burden, as an example. From the expression of molecular interactions within tumor cells to biomarkers circulating in peripheral blood, many markers have been identified as associated with the response to immunotherapy. In this review, we would like to summarize the latest knowledge about predictive and prognostic biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy in order to go further in the field of precision immuno-oncology.

PURPOSE HER2 exon 20 insertions and point mutations are oncogenic drivers found in 1%-2% of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No targeted therapy is approved for this subset of patients. We prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of the combination of two antibodies against human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2 [HER2] trastuzumab and pertuzumab with docetaxel; trastuzumab and pertuzumab) and docetaxel. METHODS The IFCT 1703-R2D2 trial is a multicenter, nonrandomized phase II study. Patients with HER2-mutated, advanced NSCLC who progressed after ≥ 1 platinum-based treatment were enrolled. Patients received pertuzumab at a loading dose of 840 mg and 420 mg thereafter; trastuzumab at an 8 mg/kg loading dose and 6 mg/kg thereafter; and docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). Other end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety ( NCT03845270 ). RESULTS Forty-five patients were enrolled and treated. The median age was 64.5 years (range, 31-84 years), 35% were smokers, 72% were females, 15% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, and 30% had brain metastases. The objective response rate was 29% (n = 13), and 58% had stable disease (n = 26). The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 8.5). The median duration of response in patients with a confirmed response (n = 13) was 11 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 14.9). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 64% of the patients. No patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (33%), diarrhea (13%), and anemia (9%). CONCLUSION Triple therapy with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel is feasible and effective for HER2-mutated pretreated advanced NSCLC. These results highlight the effectiveness of the HER2 antibody-based strategy, which should be considered for these patients.

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-opp-10.1177_10781552221090481 for A case of hepatitis induced by herbal medicine in non-small cell lung cancer patient treated by a combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy by Sébastien Lopes, Dory Anne, Pamart Guillaume, Michel Bruno, Mascaux Céline and Gourieux Bénédicte in Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), with a frequency of around 30%, and encoding a GTPAse that cycles between active form (GTP-bound) to inactive form (GDP-bound). The

Simple Summary Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cancer in the world. For common EGFR mutations, treatment is based on different inhibitors. Despite the excellent disease control with inhibitors, acquired resistance inevitably occurs and remains a biological challenge. This leads to the discovery of novel biomarkers and some possible drug targets. Resistance mechanisms could be involved as gene mutations, amplifications or fusions, which could be detected by different molecular techniques on different types of biological samples. Histological transformation is another mechanism of resistance with some biological predictive factors that needs tumor biopsy. The place of liquid biopsy also depends on the generation/line of inhibitors and could be a good candidate for molecular monitoring. This article is based on the literature and proposes actual and future directions in clinical and translational research. Abstract Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cancer in the world. Activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are a positive predictive factor for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). For common EGFR mutations (Del19, L858R), the standard first-line treatment is actually third-generation TKI, osimertinib. In the case of first-line treatment by first (erlotinib, gefitinib)- or second-generation (afatinib) TKIs, osimertinib is approved in second-line treatment for patients with T790M EGFR mutation. Despite the excellent disease control results with EGFR TKIs, acquired resistance inevitably occurs and remains a biological challenge. This leads to the discovery of novel biomarkers and possible drug targets, which vary among the generation/line of EGFR TKIs. Besides EGFR second/third mutations, alternative mechanisms could be involved, such as gene amplification or gene fusion, which could be detected by different molecular techniques on different types of biological samples. Histological transformation is another mechanism of resistance with some biological predictive factors that needs tumor biopsy. The place of liquid biopsy also depends on the generation/line of EGFR TKIs and should be a good candidate for molecular monitoring. This article is based on the literature and proposes actual and future directions in clinical and translational research.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)s were recently approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whereas brain metastases (BM) are frequent in NSCLC patients, data are missing regarding ICIs intracranial efficacy and tolerance in patients with BM from NSCLC. Methods: This retrospective study was performed in the Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovation department, Marseille, France between April 2013 and February 2016. Data from patients with NSCLC with at least one BM, and treated with ICIs (anti-PD1, anti-PDL1 or anti-CTL4) were analyzed. Clinical, biological data and outcomes were retrieved from electronic patients’ records. We assessed ICIs intracranial efficacy and tolerance. Results: Data from 55 patients were analyzed. Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were respectively of 1.8 and 36.4%. Median overall survival was 17.2 months and median progression free survival was 2.9 months. Intracranial ORR (icORR) and intracranial DCR (icDCR) were respectively 16.4% and 45.5%. Both were independent of smoking status, intracranial treatment, performance status, pathology, molecular profile and the presence or number of BM at diagnosis. However, there was a trend towards an association between icORR and ECOG PS (p = 0.05), tobacco status (p = 0.057) and intracranial treatment. Adverse events were seen in 38.2% patients without identified predictive factor. Neurological symptoms appeared in 5.5% patients during immunotherapy and improved in 3.63% patients. Conclusions: ICIs can be used safely on patients with BM from NSCLC. However, intracranial response is heterogeneous in such patients and we showed ECOG PS, tobacco smoking and intracranial treatment to be associated with an improved icORR. This is the first study looking for predictive factors of intracranial response of ICIs in patients with BM from NSCLC.

International audience; Early intervention and risk stratification solutions for lung cancer are limited by our understanding of how carcinogenesis transforms the pre-invasive epithelium and its microenvironment before the carcinoma stage. We describe the sequence of molecular and cellular changes leading to cancer formation and the co-evolution of the earliest immune response. We revealed that immune sensing, infiltration and activation of immune cells, immune escape, and microenvironment reorganization occur early in pre-cancer. These findings urge the need for broadening the scope of the established immunotherapy approaches toward prophylactic cancer treatment and preventive intervention. Leveraging the immune contexture and the mechanisms of immune modulation for individuals at risk of developing cancer and further to the general population will allow for early detection, chemoprevention, and risk stratification in the near future.

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), with a frequency of around 30%, and encoding a GTPAse that cycles between active form (GTP-bound) to inactive form (GDP-bound). The KRAS mutations favor the active form with inhibition of GTPAse activity. KRAS mutations are often with poor response of EGFR targeted therapies. KRAS mutations are good predictive factor for immunotherapy. The lack of success with direct targeting of KRAS proteins, downstream inhibition of KRAS effector pathways, and other strategies contributed to a focus on developing mutation-specific KRAS inhibitors. KRAS p.G12C mutation is one of the most frequent KRAS mutation in NSCLC, especially in current and former smokers (over 40%), which occurs among approximately 12–14% of NSCLC tumors. The mutated cysteine resides next to a pocket (P2) of the switch II region, and P2 is present only in the inactive GDP-bound KRAS. Small molecules such as sotorasib are now the first targeted drugs for KRAS G12C mutation, preventing conversion of the mutant protein to GTP-bound active state. Little is known about primary or acquired resistance. Acquired resistance does occur and may be due to genetic alterations in the nucleotide exchange function or adaptative mechanisms in either downstream pathways or in newly expressed KRAS G12C mutation.

Quantifying response to drug treatment in mouse models of human cancer is important for treatment development and assignment, and yet remains a challenging task. A preferred measure to quantify this response should take into account as much of the experimental data as possible, i.e. both tumor size over time and the variation among replicates. We propose a theoretically grounded measure, KuLGaP, to compute the difference between the treatment and control arms. KuLGaP is more selective than currently existing measures, reduces the risk of false positive calls and improves translation of the lab results to clinical practice.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cancer in the world. Activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are a positive predictive factor for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). For common EGFR mutations (Del19, L858R), the standard first-line treatment is actually third-generation TKI, osimertinib. In the case of first-line treatment by first (erlotinib, gefitinib)- or second-generation (afatinib) TKIs, osimertinib is approved in second-line treatment for patients with T790M EGFR mutation. Despite the excellent disease control results with EGFR TKIs, acquired resistance inevitably occurs and remains a biological challenge. This leads to the discovery of novel biomarkers and possible drug targets, which vary among the generation/line of EGFR TKIs. Besides EGFR second/third mutations, alternative mechanisms could be involved, such as gene amplification or gene fusion, which could be detected by different molecular techniques on different types of biological samples. Histological transformation is another mechanism of resistance with some biological predictive factors that needs tumor biopsy. The place of liquid biopsy also depends on the generation/line of EGFR TKIs and should be a good candidate for molecular monitoring. This article is based on the literature and proposes actual and future directions in clinical and translational research.

Background: EGFR TKIs are established as an effective treatment (tx) option for pts with EGFRm+ NSCLC harboring common (Del19 or L858R) mutations, but limited clinical data exist for EGFR TKI use in the 7–23% of NSCLC tumors with uncommon EGFR mutations.1 Methods: In this non-interventional, global, multi-center study (NCT04179890), existing medical or electronic health records were identified for consecutive EGFR TKI-naïve pts with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations treated with either erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib or osimertinib. Endpoints included time to tx failure (TTF), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DoR). Results: Pts (n=246; median age: 69.5 yrs; brain metastases: 7%; ECOG PS ≥2: 16%; Asian: 84%) were recruited from nine countries. Uncommon mutation categories were: major uncommon (G719X, L861Q, S768I; 73%); compound (35%); ex20ins (12%); T790M (7%); other (9%). Most pts (n=226; 92%) were treated in 1st-line with an EGFR TKI; 132 (54%), 70 (28%), 35 (14%), and 7 (3%) received afatinib, gefitinib, erlotinib, and osimertinib. 57% of pts received >1 line of therapy. Mutations were detected using PCR (75%) or sequencing (25%), mainly based on tissue biopsy (86%). Pathology reports varied in quality, often lacking detail on specific mutations, e.g. ‘ex18' or ‘ex20ins'. Overall, median TTF with an EGFR TKI was 9.9 mos; afatinib: 11.3 mos; gefitinib: 9.2 mos; erlotinib: 8.2 mos. Overall median OS was 24.4 mos. In pts with major uncommon mutations, median TTF was 14.3 and 9.8 mos with afatinib and 1st-gen TKIs. Median TTF in pts receiving 1st-line chemotherapy was only 4.0 mos. ORR was 42% overall (major: 50%; compound: 49%; other: 44%; T790M: 20%; ex20ins: 17%); afatinib: 44% (DoR: 12.0 mos); 1st-gen TKIs: 44% (DoR: 11.0 mos). More detailed analysis will be presented at the conference, including further details of outcomes in pts with specific uncommon mutations (e.g. specific ex20ins). Conclusions: EGFR TKIs were the preferred tx option in pts with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations. Response was highest in pts with major uncommon, and/or compound mutations. Data were in line with recent analyses of afatinib in uncommon mutations. Tx with an EGFR TKI should be considered as standard for pts with uncommon mutations, although many with ex20ins were not responsive. To inform optimal tx choice, specific details of EGFR mutations must be reported. References: 1.Yang JC, et al. J Thorac Oncol 2020;15:803–15 Citation Format: Satoru Miura, Te-Chun Hsia, Jen-Yu Hung, Hyun Ae Jung, Jin-Yuan Shih, Tsung-Ying Yang, Cheol-Kyu Park, Seung Hyeun Lee, Tatsuro Okamoto, Hee Kyung Ahn, Yong Chul Lee, Yuki Sato, Sung Sook Lee, Céline Mascaux, Hasan Daoud, Angela Märten, Sanjay Popat. UpSwinG: real-world, non-interventional cohort study on TKI activity in patients (pts) with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC with uncommon mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB138.

Introduction Brain metastases in EGFR / ALK -driven NSCLC frequently pose treatment dilemmas. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can control extracranial disease, but radiotherapy is often required for intracranial control. We aimed to evaluate the impact of first-line whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) or TKI alone on outcomes of patients with brain metastases from EGFR / ALK -driven NSCLC. Methods This single center retrospective review included 184 patients with brain metastases from EGFR / ALK -driven NSCLC, and analyzed effect of treatment choice on time to intracranial progression (TTIP) and overall survival (OS). Results First-line treatment for brain metastases consisted of WBRT in 120 patients, SRS in 37 and TKI alone in 27. WBRT-treated patients had more brain metastases, and more baseline symptoms. Median TTIP was longer in the WBRT group at 50.5months than SRS or TKI groups at 12 and 15months ( p =0.0038). No significant difference was seen in median OS: 21.6months in the WBRT group, 23.9months in the SRS group and 22.6months in the TKI group ( p =0.67). In multivariable analysis, age>65years (HR 2.2, p =0.0014), greater number of brain metastases (HR 2.48, p =0.0002) and greater number of extracranial metastatic sites (2 vs 0–1 HR=2.05, p =0.014 and 3+ vs 0–1 HR=2.95, p =0.0001 were associated with shorter OS. No independent effect was seen from first-line CNS treatment choice. Conclusions First-line WBRT for brain metastases from EGFR / ALK -driven NSCLC was associated with longer TTIP than SRS or TKI alone, with no difference in OS. These results could support deferral of WBRT until intracranial progression in selected patients who are closely monitored.

Early detection and treatment are critical for improving the outcome of patients with cancer1. Understanding the largely uncharted biology of carcinogenesis requires deciphering molecular processes in premalignant lesions, and revealing the determinants of the intralesional immune reaction during cancer development. The adaptive immune response within tumours has previously been shown to be strongest at the earliest stage of carcinoma2,3. Here we show that immune activation and immune escape occur before tumour invasion, and reveal the relevant immune biomarkers of the pre-invasive stages of carcinogenesis in the lung. We used gene-expression profiling and multispectral imaging to analyse a dataset of 9 morphological stages of the development of lung squamous cell carcinoma, which includes 122 well-annotated biopsies from 77 patients. We identified evolutionary trajectories of cancer and immune pathways that comprise (1) a linear increase in proliferation and DNA repair from normal to cancerous tissue; (2) a transitory increase of metabolism and early immune sensing, through the activation of resident immune cells, in low-grade pre-invasive lesions; (3) the activation of immune responses and immune escape through immune checkpoints and suppressive interleukins from high-grade pre-invasive lesions; and, ultimately, (4) the activation of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition in the invasive stage of cancer. We propose that carcinogenesis in the lung involves a dynamic co-evolution of pre-invasive bronchial cells and the immune response. These findings highlight the need to develop immune biomarkers for early detection as well as immunotherapy-based chemopreventive approaches for individuals who are at high risk of developing lung cancer., SCOPUS: le.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

9072 Background: EGFR TKIs are an established treatment (tx) option for pts with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with common mutations (Del19 or L858R); however, 7–23% of NSCLC tumors harbor uncommon EGFR mutations, where EGFR TKI efficacy is less established. These mutations are highly heterogeneous, and developments in detection by NGS are helping to identify mutations with little or no clinical data. Methods: In this non-interventional, global, multi-center study (NCT04179890), existing medical or electronic health records were identified for consecutive EGFR TKI-naïve pts with uncommon EGFR mutations (T790M, ex20ins, major uncommon [G719X, L861Q or S768I], ‘other’ or compound mutations) treated with erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, osimertinib or other systemic therapy. Endpoints were time to tx failure (TTF), ORR, OS and duration of response (DoR). Results: Overall, 246 pts (median age: 69.5 yrs; Asian: 84%; brain metastases: 8%; ECOG PS ≥2: 16%) were recruited from 9 countries. Most pts (n=226; 92%) received an EGFR TKI as 1st-line therapy; 132 (54%), 105 (43%) and 7 (3%) received afatinib, 1st-gen TKIs and osimertinib, respectively. 57% of pts received >1 line of therapy. Most pts (73%) had a major uncommon mutation, 9% had other mutations and 33% had a compound mutation; these were detected using PCR (75%) or sequencing (25%), mainly based on tissue biopsy (86%). Pathology reports varied in quality, often lacking detail on specific mutations e.g. 21% of ex18 and 72% of ex20ins were undefined. Median TTF and OS with EGFR TKIs were 9.9 and 24.4 mos; ORR was 42%. In pts treated with 1st-line chemotherapy (n=20), median TTF and ORR were 6.6 mos and 41%. Outcomes were most favorable in major uncommon and compound mutations (Table). TTF appeared to be higher with afatinib vs 1st-gen EGFR TKIs. In most mutation categories, median OS was >2 yrs, possibly reflecting high subsequent therapy uptake. Conclusions: In a real-world setting, EGFR TKIs were the preferred tx option in pts with uncommon EGFR mutations; strongest outcomes were seen in major uncommon and compound mutations, and in pts treated with afatinib. Data were in line with recent analyses of afatinib in uncommon mutations. Tx with an EGFR TKI should be considered as standard for most pts with uncommon mutations. Optimal tx for pts with uncommon mutations requires improvements in pathology reports, with more emphasis on NGS methodology and precise definition of mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT04179890. [Table: see text]

2579 Background: In preclinical studies, the combination of anti-VEGF/Ang2 and anti-PD-1 therapy has been shown to promote an immunopermissive state, which is supportive of T-cell-mediated tumor cell destruction. BI 836880 is a humanized bispecific nanobody that targets VEGF and Ang2, and ezabenlimab (BI 754091) is an anti-PD-1 antibody. Phase I studies investigating each as monotherapies have reported safety and preliminary antitumor activity. This ongoing Phase Ib study is evaluating the combination of BI 836880 and ezabenlimab in pts with advanced solid tumors. In Part 1 (dose escalation), the combination was feasible in pts with advanced NSCLC, with a recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of BI 836880 720 mg + ezabenlimab 240 mg IV q3w. Here, we report updated results from Part 2 (expansion phase), which is assessing the antitumor activity and safety of the RP2D. Methods: Seven cohorts are currently recruiting pts in Part 2: metastatic (m) NSCLC after checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) monotherapy (Cohort A); mNSCLC after chemotherapy (CT) + CPI (Cohort B); mSCLC after CT ± CPI (Cohort C); 1st and 2nd recurrences of glioblastoma (GBM; Cohort D); immunotherapy-resistant m-melanoma (Cohort E); hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after prior sorafenib or lenvatinib ± CPI (Cohort F); and previously untreated/unresectable HCC (Cohort G). Primary endpoint is objective response rate (complete response + partial response [PR]). Results: As of January 2021, 196 pts have received BI 836880 plus ezabenlimab (14 in Part 1, 182 in Part 2 [Cohort A, 26; B, 30; C, 19; D, 31; E, 32; F, 28; G, 16]). 134 (68%) pts were male, median age was 63 years and 102 (52%) had prior CPI use. Any grade and ≥G3 adverse events (AEs; any cause) were reported by 160 (82%) and 62 (32%) pts, most commonly (all%/≥G3%) hypertension (20/8), asthenia (20/3), diarrhea, decreased appetite, and nausea (all 11/1). 95 (48%) pts had a drug-related AE, most commonly hypertension and asthenia (both 11%). 6 pts had a G4 AE (non-related: hyperkalemia + cardiac arrest, laryngospasm, gastrointestinal perforation; drug-related: anaphylactic reaction, acute pancreatitis, transaminases increased); 8 pts had a G5 AE (non-related: general physical health deterioration, epilepsy, hemoptysis, cardio-respiratory arrest, hepatic failure, intracranial hemorrhage, COVID-19 pneumonia; drug-related tracheal hemorrhage). 30 (15%) pts had immune-related AEs (3% ≥G3), including hypothyroidism (3%). 11 (6%) pts had an AE leading to discontinuation. Overall, 145 pts were evaluable for response: 9 pts achieved confirmed PR (2 pts in Part 1 and 7 in Part 2 [NSCLC, n = 3; SCLC, n = 1; GBM, n = 1; melanoma, n = 1; and 2nd-line HCC, n = 1]), 87 pts had stable disease and 49 pts had progressive disease. 111 pts remain on treatment. Conclusions: BI 836880 plus ezabenlimab had a manageable safety profile. The combination showed preliminary antitumor activity in a range of tumor types. Clinical trial information: NCT03468426.

11552 Background: SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas (SDS) are rare and aggressive sarcomas characterized by inactivating SMARCA4 mutations, with no approved treatment to date. Previous data linking SWI/SNF deficiency with tumor immune microenvironment (TME) are contradictory. While an immunogenic microenvironment and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were described in SMARCA4-deficient small cell carcinoma of the ovary, the TME phenotype of SDS is unknown; in addition, response of patients to ICI is lacking. Methods: All consecutive patients diagnosed with SDS between 2016 and 2019 in Strasbourg University Hospital were included and clinical outcomes collected. Immunostainings for immune cell markers, immune checkpoints and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) were assessed on available samples. Validation was performed using an independent transcriptomes dataset of SDS (n = 12), not otherwise specified (NOS) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with/without SMARCA4 mutations (n = 14) and undifferentiated thoracic sarcoma (n = 5). Finally, chemokines (CXL9 and CXCL10) and PD-L1 expressions were assessed in NSCLC and thoracic fibroblast cell lines, treated with/without interferon gamma (IFNG). Results: Nine patients were identified and had all metastatic disease at presentation, with a median overall survival of 1.8 months (0.3-NR). Among them, 4 received ICI as part of their treatment. Out of 11 evaluated tumors samples, all but one case showed no TLS, consistent with an immune desert TME phenotype charted by low densities of CD3+ T-cells, CD8+ T-cells, CD20+ B-cells from one side and high density of CD68+ macrophage-cells from the other side. Conversely, the unique tumor with TLS aggregate showed an immune-rich TME phenotype associated with high mutational tumor burden. While the patient with TLS harboring tumor showed an exceptional long-lasting response, the 3 remaining patients without TLS had progressive disease at best response to ICI. Using an independent cohort, unsupervised clustering using immune cell scores identified two clusters tightly associated with cell ontogeny of cancer subtypes and immunity; while cluster 1 (C1) was enriched for NOS NSCLC independently from SMARCA4 status (n = 9/10; 90%) (p = 0.001), C2 was enriched for SDS (n = 11/12; 91.7%) (p = 0.005) and undifferentiated thoracic sarcomas (n = 5/5; 100%) (p = 0.0005). Finally, SMARCA4 loss of function experiments revealed upregulation of chemokines (CXL9 and CXCL10) and PD-L1 expression in the NSCLC cell line with no effect on thoracic fibroblast cell line. Conclusions: SDS harbor an immune desert TME phenotype with limited efficacy to ICI, similar to other sarcomas. Our data suggest that TME of SMARCA4-driven tumors might vary according to the cell of origin. Further studies are needed to understand the interplay between SWI/SNF mutations, cell ontogeny and immunity.

9015 Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2) exon 20 insertions and mutations are oncogenic drivers found in 1-2% of NSCLC. However, there are no approved therapies for these patients. Many studies suggest that the use of HER2 inhibitors developed for breast cancer patients might be of interest in this setting. The aim of this trial was to prospectively evaluate the interest of a combination of two antibodies against HER2 (trastuzumab and pertuzumab) with docetaxel. Methods: IFCT-1703 R2D2 trial is a multicenter, non-randomized phase 2 study with a two-stage design, a power of 90% and an alpha risk at 5% (one-sided). HER2 mutational status was assessed locally in certified molecular genetic centers. Main other inclusion criteria were advanced NSCLC, progression after ≥ 1 platinum-based chemotherapy, asymptomatic brain metastases, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50%, and PS 0-2. Patients were treated every 3 weeks with pertuzumab at a loading dose of 840 mg, and 420 mg thereafter; plus trastuzumab at a loading dose of 8 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg thereafter; and docetaxel at 75 mg/m². Treatment was given until toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR). Other endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival and safety. NCT number: NCT03845270. Results: From May 2019 to October 2020, 45 patients were enrolled in 17 centers and received study treatment. Median age was 64.5 years (range 31–84), 72% females, 35% smokers, 100% non-squamous histology and 15% with ECOG PS 2. 31.1% patients had brain metastases. PD-L1 was expressed ≥ 1% and ≥ 50% in 36% and 7% of the patients, respectively. No other oncogene driver was found associated with HER2 exon 20 mutation. With a median follow-up of 12 months, 44 (98%) patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Overall response rate was 29% (n = 13), stable disease 56% (n = 26). Median PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI[4.0-8.5]). Median duration of treatment in patients with confirmed response (n = 13) was 10 months (95% CI[2.7-14.9]). At the time of data cut-off, 15 patients (33%) were still under treatment. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were observed in 64% of patients. No patient experienced treatment discontinuation because of toxicity. One sudden death was possibly related to treatment. Most frequent grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (33%), diarrhea (13%) and anaemia (9%). Grade 1/2 dyspnea was observed in 3 (6.7%) patients. No ILD were reported. Variation LVEF was -1.72% on average (min: -18 %; max: 10 %). Conclusions: The triplet trastuzumab, pertuzumab and docetaxel is feasible and active in HER2 pretreated advanced NSCLC. These results confirm the activity of HER2 antibodies-based strategy which should be considered in these patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03845270.

Background KRAS and TP53 are common mutations in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation Biological Program group found adjuvant chemotherapy to be deleterious in patients with coexisting KRAS/TP53 mutations. Patients and Methods To validate these results, patients with NSCLC tested for KRAS and TP53 mutations and receiving chemotherapy for any stage NSCLC were selected. Mutation status was analyzed using next generation sequencing (Illumina) or multiplex recurrent mutation detection (MassARRAY, Agena Biosciences) assays, and was correlated with clinical and demographic data. Disease-free (DFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) was the main endpoint, and overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint. Results Among 218 patients, 28 had coexisting KRAS/TP53 mutations, 77 TP53, 37 KRAS, 76 had neither KRAS nor TP53 mutation (WT/WT). There was no DFS/PFS difference for the KRAS/TP53 group versus all others among 99 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-2.44; P = .57), 27 stage III patients who received chemo-radiation (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.32-2.38; P = .8), and 63 patients who received palliative chemotherapy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.31-1.48; P = .33). OS was longer in the WT/WT group compared with any other group (KRAS: HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.02-3.43; P = .043; TP53: HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.3-3.61; P = .0028; KRAS/TP53: HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.09-3.88; P = .026). No OS difference was seen for KRAS/TP53 compared with the other groups (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.75-2.13; P = .38). Conclusions There was no significant difference in DFS/PFS between the 4 groups. However, OS was longer for patients with TP53 and KRAS wild-type NSCLC who received chemotherapy for any stage compared with patients with KRAS, TP53 mutation, or double mutant tumors.

Precision medicine commonly refers to the selection of the most effective cancer treatments based on the presence of specific biomarkers (eg, genomic abnormalities) in a patient's tumor. Therefore, genomic testing is used to identify patients whose tumors harbor the vulnerability that is sensitive to corresponding targeted therapies. This approach allows for the selection of patients who have the greatest chance of deriving benefit from the treatments, reduces toxicity, and significantly improves outcome; precision medicine is recommended for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. This article reviews the evolution of genomic testing in lung cancer, from its development, including first success and failures, to its current use in the care of patients with lung cancer, and addresses future considerations, such as the expected increase of targetable abnormalities, the need to follow the genomic profile over time, and tumor heterogeneity.

Clinical variables, like stage and performance status (PS), have predictive and prognostic values in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with chemotherapy, not allowing adequate individual prediction. MicroRNA (miRNA) are non-coding RNAs regulating gene expression. In a prospective study, we assessed the predictive value for response and survival of tumour miRNA in NSCLC patients treated by 1st line cisplatin and vinorelbine. miRNA expression was analysed on a biopsy obtained during the diagnostic bronchoscopy, using TaqMan Low Density Arrays. The signature for response was derived using logistic regression with stepwise variable selection. The associations between overall survival and miRNA expression levels were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regression models to estimate the hazard ratios. In total, 38 patients with adequate tumour biopsies, treated with cisplatin-vinorelbine were included: male (n = 27), 80-100 Karnofsky PS (n = 27), adenocarcinoma (n = 20), stage IV (n = 30). One patient was considered not assessable for response but remained included in the survival analyses. Out of the 37 patients assessable for response, 16 partial responses (43%) were observed. A two miRNA signature (miR-149 and miR-375) was found predictive for response and was also associated to progression-free survival (p = 0.05). Using a linear combination of the miR CT values with Cox's regression coefficients as weights, we constructed a prognostic score for overall survival including four miRNA (miR-200c, miR-424, miR-29c and miR-124). The signature distinguished patients with good (n = 18) and poor (n = 20) prognosis with respective median survival times of 47.3 months (95% CI 29.8-52.4) and 15.5 months (95% CI 9.1-22.8) (p0.001; hazard ratio 21.1, 95% CI 4.7-94.9).miRNA signature allows predicting response and is of prognostic value for survival in patients with NSCLC treated with first line cisplatin and vinorelbine.

Background Treatments of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—particularly of the squamous subtype—are limited. In this article, we describe the immunomodulatory environment in NSCLC and the potential for therapeutic targeting of the immune system through cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint pathway blockade. Materials and methods We searched PubMed and presented abstracts for publications describing the clinical benefit of checkpoint blockade in NSCLC. Results Antibody-mediated checkpoint molecule blockade is being investigated in NSCLC, and of these approaches, the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab has undergone the most extensive clinical study. By targeting the immune system rather than specific antigens, checkpoint blockade agents differ from vaccine therapy. In a phase II study in advanced NSCLC, phased ipilimumab with chemotherapy demonstrated the greatest efficacy in squamous NSCLC. A phase I study of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, has suggested that this agent is also active against squamous and non-squamous NSCLC. Ongoing phase III studies are evaluating the therapeutic potential of these agents. Conclusions Although treatment options for NSCLC are limited, a better understanding of the immune profile of this disease has facilitated the development of immunotherapeutics that target checkpoint blockade molecules, and clinical evaluation to date supports combining checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy for squamous NSCLC.

The greatest news of the past year in this field was the first large-scale early detection trial that could prove a 20% reduction in lung cancer-related mortality by screening high-risk individuals with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Several expert groups and medical societies have assessed the data and concluded that LDCT screening for lung cancer is, however, not ready for large-scale population-based implementation. Too many open questions remain, such as definition of the at-risk population, timing and intervals of screening, optimal method of acquisition and interpretation of the images, how to handle (false) positive findings, and especially cost-effectiveness in relation to other lung cancer prevention strategies, mainly smoking cessation. Further analyses and several ongoing European trials are eagerly awaited. Much hope also resides in the use of biomarkers, as their use in, e.g., blood or exhaled air may provide more easy-to-use tests to better stratify high-risk populations for screening studies. While exciting research is ongoing in this domain--e.g. with microRNAs--none of the tests has yet reached sufficient validation for clinical use. Early central lung cancers are more difficult to visualise by CT. For these patients, standard bronchoscopy, complemented by autofluoresence endoscopy, has been studied in different screening and follow-up settings.

OA embargo BACKGROUND:: Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy represents the standard of care in first-line treatment of advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, there are no established predictors of clinical benefit. Pemetrexed inhibits multiple enzymes involved in pyrimidine and purine synthesis, but the main target is thymidylate synthase (TS). After cellular uptake pemetrexed is converted into more effective polyglutamated forms by folylpoly-γ- glutamate synthetase (FPGS). We hypothesized that FPGS and TS protein expressions are associated with clinical outcome after pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. METHODS:: Pretreatment tumor samples from 84 patients with histologically confirmed MPM, who received pemetrexed combined with platinum (79 of 84) or single-agent pemetrexed (5 of 84) as first-line treatment, were retrospectively analyzed. FPGS and TS protein expressions were semiquantitatively assessed by using the Hybrid (H)-scoring system (range, 0-300). H-scores were correlated with radiological response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS:: Median H-score of the entire cohort was 230 for FPGS (range, 100-300), and 210 for TS (range, 100-300). High FPGS protein expression was significantly associated with longer PFS (pCOX = 0.0337), better objective tumor response (partial response versus stable disease + progressive disease; pKW = 0.003), and improved disease-control rate (partial response + stable disease versus progressive disease; pKW = 0.0208), but not with OS. In addition, high TS protein expression was associated with progressive disease under pemetrexed-based therapy (p = 0.0383), and shorter OS (pCOX = 0.0071), but no association with PFS was observed. CONCLUSION:: FPGS and TS expressions were associated with clinical response and outcome to pemetrexed-based first-line chemotherapy in MPM. Prospective evaluation of FPGS and TS expressions and their prognostic/predictive power in MPM patients is warranted. © 2012 by the International Association for the Study of Lung.

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not recommended for predicting response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) due to conflicting results, all using antibodies detecting EGFR external domain (ED). We tested the predictive value of EGFR protein expression for response to an EGFR TKI with an antibody that detects the intracellular domain (ID) and compared fluorescence-based Automated QUantitative Analysis (AQUA) technology to immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: Specimens from 98 gefitinib-treated NSCLC Japanese patients were evaluated by IHC (n = 98 of 98) and AQUA technology (n = 70 of 98). EGFR ID (5B7)- and ED-specific antibodies (3C6 and 31G7) were compared. Results: EGFR expression evaluated with 5B7 was significantly higher in responders versus nonresponders to gefitinib both with IHC and with AQUA. ED-specific antibodies did not significantly predict response. Using AQUA and ID-specific antibody resulted in the best prediction performance with a positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) for responders of 50% and 87%, respectively. EGFR expression with ID-specific antibody and AQUA also predicted responders in EGFR-mutated patients. Increased EGFR expression with the ID antibody is associated with increased median progression free survival (PFS; 11.7 months vs. 5.0, log rank, P = 0.034) and overall survival (OS; 38.6 vs. 14.9, P = 0.040) from gefitinib therapy. Conclusions: EGFR protein expression using an ID-specific antibody specifically predicts response to gefitinib in NSCLC patients, including in EGFR-mutated patients, and increased PFS/OS from gefitinib. These data suggest that the choice of diagnostic antibody and methodology matters to predict response and outcome to specific therapies. The potential clinical application needs further validation. Clin Cancer Res; 17(24); 7796–807. ©2011 AACR.

Purpose: Present chemotherapeutic regimens are marginally efficient in tumor cells being particularly resistant to radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. We hypothesized that unresponsiveness of tumors to conventional therapeutic agents might be due to inappropriate gene expression resulting from epigenetic modifications and leading to transcriptional silencing. The goal of this study was to evaluate the anticancer effect of a histone deacetylase inhibitor, valproate, on mesothelioma cells in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin, the usual first-line regimen of chemotherapy for this tumor. Experimental Design and Results: We show that valproate augments apoptosis induced by pemetrexed and cisplatin in mesothelioma cell lines and in tumor cells from patient's biopsies. Onset of apoptosis involves both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways requiring enzymatic activities of caspases 8 and 9, respectively. Valproate but not suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid efficiently stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species. The free radical scavenger N-acetylcysteine inhibits apoptosis, indicating that reactive oxygen species are major mediators of valproate activity. As expected, valproate alone or combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin triggers hyperacetylation of histone H3. Bid protein processing in truncated t-Bid and cytochrome c release from mitochondria are significantly increased in the presence of valproate, providing a mechanistic rationale for improvement of the proapoptotic efficacy of cisplatin and pemetrexed. Finally, valproate when combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin prevents tumor growth in mouse models of epithelioid mesothelioma. Conclusions: These observations support the potential additional efficacy of valproate in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin for treatment of malignant mesothelioma.

New biological factors have not been extensively studied in stage III NSCLC as yet. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the association between the expression and the prognostic role on survival of four biological markers in stage III NSCLC. Clinical characteristics were retrieved from the patients charts. EGF-R, Mdm2, p53 and TTF-1 expressions were evaluated by immunohistochemistry by three independent observers. Cox multivariate model was used to assess the impact of clinical and biological factors on patients' survival. A total of 84 stage III NSCLC patients, treated between 03/1987 and 08/2003, were included in the study. There was a statistically significant association between the expression of TTF-1 and EGFR (p=0.01) or TTF-1 and Mdm2 (p=0.04). Positive expressions for EGFR or TTF-1 were almost mutually exclusive. The status EGFR+/TTF-1--was mainly found in squamous cell carcinoma (18 among 19tumours). In multivariate analysis, only treatment with curative intent was independently associated with better survival (p=0.0004). In stage III NSCLC, there was a significant association between TTF-1 and EGFR or TTF-1 and Mdm2. The status EGFR+/TTF-1--was associated with squamous cell carcinoma.

MicroRNAs, negative post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression, are involved in cancer. Their role in early bronchial carcinogenesis was analysed in 60 biopsies obtained by fluorescence bronchoscopy (six per stage: normal tissue of nonsmokers, normal normofluorescent and hypofluorescent bronchial tissue of smokers, hyperplasia, metaplasia, mild, moderate and severe dysplasia, in situ carcinoma and invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC)). In total, 69 microRNAs were found to be differentially expressed in the course of bronchial carcinogenesis. Among them, some microRNAs showed a linear evolution of their expression level, such as miR-32 and miR-34c, whose expression progressively decreased from normal bronchial tissues of nonsmokers to SQCC. Others behaved differently at successive stages, such as miR-142-3p or miR-9, or are only altered from a specific stage, such as miR-199a or miR-139. MicroRNAs globally followed a two-step evolution, first decreasing (a reverse of their increase during embryogenesis) during the earliest morphological modifications of bronchial epithelium, and thereafter increasing at later stages of lung carcinogenesis. Moreover, microRNA expression was very efficient for the prediction of the histological classification between low- and high-grade lesions and between in situ and invasive carcinoma. The present data show, for the first time, that microRNAs are involved in bronchial carcinogenesis from the very early steps of this process and, thus, could provide tools for early detection of lung cancer.

Background: The aim of this study was to estimate the efficiency of a recent five-category urinary cytological classification. Methods: A total of 592 bladder washings were fixed immediately with Saccomanno's fixative. All samples were centrifuged in a Hettich cyto-centrifuge. For each sample, the reference standard was the histology when a lesion was present at the time of cystoscopy. A five-category cytological classification was used: negative, suspicious of low (S-Lg) or high (S-Hg) grade neoplasia and consistent with low (Lg) or high (Hg) grade neoplasia. Results: For cytological diagnoses of S-Lg and Lg, sensitivity was 37% and specificity was 95% for the histological diagnosis of low-grade non-invasive urothelial papillary tumour (Lg-UPT), which included papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential and low-grade urothelial carcinoma. For cytological diagnosis of S-Hg and Hg, sensitivity was 44% for high-grade non-invasive urothelial papillary carcinoma (Hg-UPC), 70% for carcinoma in situ (CIS) and 81% for invasive carcinoma (T1 and higher). Specificity was 99% in each case. Cytological diagnosis of S-Hg or Hg was not found for Lg-UPT (0/59) and no cytological diagnosis of S-Lg or Lg was found for invasive carcinoma, but was seen for Hg-UPC in 10% (3/28) and for CIS in 6% (3/50) of cases. Conclusion: Despite the absence of international consensus, the recent five-category cytological classification for urine is accurate for current urological practice.

Purpose Although epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) –mutated adenocarcinomas initially have high response rates to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), most patients eventually develop resistance. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are considered preferred preclinical models to study the biology of patient tumors. EGFR-mutant PDX models may be valuable tools to study the biology of these tumors and to elucidate mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies. Methods Surgically resected early-stage non–small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) tumors were implanted into nonobese diabetic severe combined immune deficient (NOD-SCID) mice. EGFR TKI treatment was initiated at tumor volumes of 150 μL. Gene expression analysis was performed using a microarray platform. Results Of 33 lung adenocarcinomas with EGFR activating mutations, only 6 (18%) engrafted and could be propagated beyond passage one. Engraftment was associated with upregulation of genes involved in mitotic checkpoint and cell proliferation. A differentially expressed gene set between engrafting and nonengrafting patients could identify patients harboring EGFR-mutant tumor with significantly different prognoses in The Cancer Genome Atlas Lung Adenocarcinoma datasets. The PDXs included models with variable sensitivity to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs and the monoclonal antibody cetuximab. All EGFR-mutant NSCLC PDXs studied closely recapitulated their corresponding patient tumor phenotype and clinical course, including response pattern to EGFR TKIs. Conclusion PDX models closely recapitulate primary tumor biology and clinical outcome. They may serve as important laboratory models to investigate mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies, and for preclinical testing of novel treatment strategies.

The Helicase-like Transcription Factor (HLTF) belongs to the SWI/SNF family of proteins involved in chromatin remodeling. In addition to its role in gene transcription, HLTF has been implicated in DNA repair, which suggests that this protein acts as a tumor suppressor. Accumulating evidence indicates that HLTF expression is altered in various cancers via two mechanisms: gene silencing through promoter hypermethylation or alternative mRNA splicing, which leads to the expression of truncated proteins that lack DNA repair domains. In either case, the alteration of HLTF expression in cancer has a poor prognosis. In this review, we gathered published clinical and molecular data on HLTF. Our purposes are (a) to address whether HLTF alterations could be considered as cancer drivers or passengers and (b) to determine whether its different functions (transcription or DNA repair) could be diverted in clonal selection during cancer progression.

The proto-oncogene RAS, coding for a 21 kDa protein (p21), is mutated in 20% of lung cancer. However, the literature remains controversial on its prognostic significance for survival in lung cancer. We performed a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis to assess its possible prognostic value on survival. Published studies on lung cancer assessing prognostic value of RAS mutation or p21 overexpression on survival were identified by an electronic search. After a methodological assessment, we estimated individual hazard ratios (HR) estimating RAS protein alteration or RAS mutation effect on survival and combined them using meta-analytic methods. In total, 53 studies were found eligible, with 10 concerning the same cohorts of patients. Among the 43 remaining studies, the revelation method was immunohistochemistry (IHC) in nine and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 34. Results in terms of survival were significantly pejorative, significantly favourable, not significant and not conclusive in 9, 1, 31, 2, respectively. In total, 29 studies were evaluable for meta-analysis but we aggregated only the 28 dealing with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and not the only one dealing with small-cell-lung cancer (SCLC). The quality scores were not statistically significantly different between studies with or without significant results in terms of survival, allowing us to perform a quantitative aggregation. The combined HR was 1.35 (95% CI: 1.16-1.56), showing a worse survival for NSCLC with KRAS2 mutations or p21 overexpression and, particularly, in adenocarcinomas (ADC) (HR 1.59; 95% CI 1.26-2.02) and in studies using PCR (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.18-1.65) but not in studies using IHC (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.86-1.34). RAS appears to be a pejorative prognostic factor in terms of survival in NSCLC globally, in ADC and when it is studied by PCR., Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, SCOPUS: re.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

C-erbB-2 prognostic value for survival in patients with lung cancer remains controversial. We performed a systematic review of the literature to clarify its impact. Studies were identified by an electronic search in order to aggregate the survival results, after a methodological assessment using the scale of the European Lung Cancer Working Party. To be eligible, a study had to deal with c-erbB-2 assessment in lung cancer patients and to analyse survival according to c-erbB-2 expression. In total, 30 studies were eligible: 24 studies dealt with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), five with adenocarcinoma and one study dealt with small-cell carcinoma. In all, 31% of the patients were positive for c-erbB-2. According to c-erbB-2 expression, 13 studies were 'negative' (significant detrimental effect on survival), one 'positive' (significant survival improvement) and 16 not significant. Significant studies had a better subscore relative to analysis and results report than nonsignificant studies. In total, 86% of the significant studies and only 56% of the nonsignificant studies were evaluable for the meta-analysis. This suggests a possible bias in our aggregated results. For NSCLC, the hazard ratio was 1.55 (95% CI: 1.29-1.86) in favour of tumours that do not express c-erbB-2. In conclusion, the overexpression of c-erbB-2 might be a factor of poor prognosis for survival in NSCLC, but there is a potential bias in favour of the significant studies with an overestimation risk of the magnitude of the true effect of c-erbB-2 overexpression., Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

The role of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in lung cancer remains controversial. In order to clarify its impact on survival in small and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we performed a systematic review of the literature. Trials were selected for further analysis if they provided an independent assessment of Bcl-2 in lung cancer and reported analysis of survival data according to Bcl-2 status. To make it possible to aggregate survival results of the published studies, their methodology was assessed using a quality scale designed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party (including study design, laboratory methods and analysis). Of 28 studies, 11 identified Bcl-2 expression as a favourable prognostic factor and three linked it with poor prognosis; 14 trials were not significant. No differences in scoring measurement were detected between the studies, except that significantly higher scores were found in the trials with the largest sample sizes. Assessments of methodology and of laboratory technique were made independently of the conclusion of the trials. A total of 25 trials, comprising 3370 patients, provided sufficient information for the meta-analysis. The studies were categorised according to histology, disease stage and laboratory technique. The combined hazard ratio (HR) suggested that a positive Bcl-2 status has a favourable impact on survival: 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.86) in seven studies on stages I-II NSCLC; 0.50 (0.39-0.65) in eight studies on surgically resected NSCLC; 0.91 (0.76-1.10) in six studies on any stage NSCLC; 0.57 (0.41-0.78) in five studies on squamous cell cancer; 0.75 (0.61-0.93) and 0.71 (0.61-0.83) respectively for five studies detecting Bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry with Ab clone 100 and for 13 studies assessing Bcl-2 with Ab clone 124; 0.92 (0.73-1.16) for four studies on small cell lung cancer; 1.26 (0.58-2.72) for three studies on neuroendocrine tumours. In NSCLC, Bcl-2 expression was associated with a better prognosis. The data on Bcl-2 expression in small cell lung cancer were insufficient to assess its prognostic value., Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

The role of chemotherapy for unresectable malignant mesothelioma is unclear. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the methodological quality of published papers relative to chemotherapy or immunotherapy in malignant mesothelioma and to aggregate, for trials having a similar methodology, the response rates in order to identify the most active chemotherapeutic drugs and regimens. The literature relative to this topic, published between 1965 and June 2001 was reviewed. A methodological qualitative evaluation was performed according to the European Lung Cancer Working Party scale, specifically designed for phase II trials. A study was considered as potentially positive if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the response rate was greater than 20% and positive if the lower limit of the 95% CI was >20%. Eighty-three studies (88 treatment arms) were eligible for the systematic review. Fifty-three arms were considered as positive or potentially positive. No statistically significant difference in the methodological quality was observed between negative and positive studies. Studies were aggregated in four groups according to the presence of cisplatin and/or doxorubicin in the treatment regimen. The combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin had the highest response rate (28.5%; P

In order to determine whether angiogenesis is a prognostic marker in lung cancer, we performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the prognostic value on survival of microvessel count in patients with lung cancer. Published studies were identified by an electronic search in order to aggregate survival results, after a methodological assessment using a quality scale designed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party. To be eligible, a study had to deal with microvessel count assessment in lung cancer patients on the primary site and to provide survival analysis according to microvessel count expression. Microvessel count has been assessed on surgical samples by immunohistochemistry using factor VIII in 14 studies, CD34 in 10 and CD31 in eight. Respectively 1866, 1440 and 1093 non-small cell lung cancer patients were considered. The overall median quality scores were respectively 52, 59 and 59% for studies assessing microvessel count via factor VIII, CD34 and CD31, without significant difference between studies evaluable or not for meta-analysis nor between studies with significant or non significant results. Seven 'factor VIII' studies, nine 'CD34' and seven 'CD31' provided sufficient data allowing a meta-analysis on survival and were evaluable for results aggregation. This showed that a high microvessel count in the primitive lung tumour was a statistically significant poor prognostic factor for survival in non small cell lung cancer whatever it was assessed by factor VIII (HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.16-2.84), CD34 (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.53-2.58) or CD31 (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.10-2.96). Variations in survival among the individual studies can be explained in addition to patients selection criteria by the heterogeneous methodologies used to stain and count microvessels: different antibody clones, identification of 'hotspots', Weidner or Chalkey counting method, cut-off selection. Microvessel count, reflecting the angiogenesis, appears to be a poor prognostic factor for survival in surgically treated non small cell lung cancer but standardisation of angiogenesis assessment by the microvessel count is necessary., Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

The effectiveness of granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) in the treatment of febrile neutropenic cancer patients remains controversial. To assess their role in this condition, we conducted a systematic review of randomised trials published as full papers. A methodological evaluation using a specifically designed quality scale was performed before meta-analysis. Eleven trials were eligible, 8 of which were meta-analysable. The median quality score for the 11 pooled trials was 58.3% (range: 33.3%-68.8%). No significant quality difference was observed between positive (colony-stimulating factor more effective) and negative trials ( P=0.36). No quality difference was observed between the 8 meta-analysable studies and the 3 others, with respective median scores of 59.3% and 50%. No advantage was detected for the use of CSF in terms of mortality from febrile neutropenia, with a relative risk of 0.71 (95% CI 0.44-1.15). The relative risk was 0.66 (95% CI 0.39-1.13) in the G-CSF subgroup and 0.97 (95% CI 0.34-2.79) in the GM-CSF subgroup. Aggregation of the results on infection-related mortality, length of stay in hospital, fever and of neutropenia duration, antibiotic therapy adaptation and duration, superinfection rate and toxicity was not possible owing to the lack of adequate data in the publications. On the basis of this review, we cannot recommend the routine use of G-CSF or GM-CSF in established febrile neutropenia.