11 results on '"Céline J. W. Bonfils"'
Search Results
2. Improving Seasonal Forecast Using Probabilistic Deep Learning
- Author
-
Baoxiang Pan, Gemma J. Anderson, André Goncalves, Donald D. Lucas, Céline J. W. Bonfils, and Jiwoo Lee
- Subjects
seasonal forecast ,deep learning ,variational inference ,Physical geography ,GB3-5030 ,Oceanography ,GC1-1581 - Abstract
Abstract The path toward realizing the potential of seasonal forecasting and its socioeconomic benefits relies on improving general circulation model (GCM) based dynamical forecast systems. To improve dynamical seasonal forecasts, it is crucial to set up forecast benchmarks, and clarify forecast limitations posed by model initialization errors, formulation deficiencies, and internal climate variability. With huge costs in generating large forecast ensembles, and limited observations for forecast verification, the seasonal forecast benchmarking and diagnosing task proves challenging. Here, we develop a probabilistic deep learning‐based statistical forecast methodology, drawing on a wealth of climate simulations to enhance seasonal forecast capability and forecast diagnosis. By explicitly modeling the internal climate variability and GCM formulation differences, the proposed Conditional Generative Forecasting (CGF) methodology enables bypassing crucial barriers in dynamical forecast, and offers a top‐down viewpoint to examine how complicated GCMs encode the seasonal predictability information. We apply the CGF methodology for global seasonal forecast of precipitation and 2 m air temperature, based on a unique data set consisting 52,201 years of climate simulation. Results show that the CGF methodology can faithfully represent the seasonal predictability information encoded in GCMs. We successfully apply this learned relationship in real‐world seasonal forecast, achieving competitive performance compared to dynamical forecasts. Using this CGF as benchmark, we reveal the impact of insufficient forecast spread sampling that limits the skill of the considered dynamical forecast system. Finally, we introduce different strategies for composing ensembles using the CGF methodology, highlighting the potential for leveraging the strengths of multiple GCMs to achieve advantgeous seasonal forecast.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Learning to Correct Climate Projection Biases
- Author
-
Baoxiang Pan, Gemma J. Anderson, André Goncalves, Donald D. Lucas, Céline J. W. Bonfils, Jiwoo Lee, Yang Tian, and Hsi‐Yen Ma
- Subjects
deep learning ,climate projection ,bias correction ,generative adversarial net ,Physical geography ,GB3-5030 ,Oceanography ,GC1-1581 - Abstract
Abstract The fidelity of climate projections is often undermined by biases in climate models due to their simplification or misrepresentation of unresolved climate processes. While various bias correction methods have been developed to post‐process model outputs to match observations, existing approaches usually focus on limited, low‐order statistics, or break either the spatiotemporal consistency of the target variable, or its dependency upon model resolved dynamics. We develop a Regularized Adversarial Domain Adaptation (RADA) methodology to overcome these deficiencies, and enhance efficient identification and correction of climate model biases. Instead of pre‐assuming the spatiotemporal characteristics of model biases, we apply discriminative neural networks to distinguish historical climate simulation samples and observation samples. The evidences based on which the discriminative neural networks make distinctions are applied to train the domain adaptation neural networks to bias correct climate simulations. We regularize the domain adaptation neural networks using cycle‐consistent statistical and dynamical constraints. An application to daily precipitation projection over the contiguous United States shows that our methodology can correct all the considered moments of daily precipitation at approximately 1° resolution, ensures spatiotemporal consistency and inter‐field correlations, and can discriminate between different dynamical conditions. Our methodology offers a powerful tool for disentangling model parameterization biases from their interactions with the chaotic evolution of climate dynamics, opening a novel avenue toward big‐data enhanced climate predictions.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Human influence on joint changes in temperature, rainfall and continental aridity
- Author
-
Céline J. W. Bonfils, Benjamin D. Santer, John C. Fyfe, Kate Marvel, Thomas J. Phillips, and Susan R. H. Zimmerman
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Despite the pervasive impact of drought on human and natural systems, the large-scale mechanisms conducive to regional drying remain poorly understood. Here we use a multivariate approach to identify two distinct externally forced fingerprints from multiple ensembles of Earth system model simulations. The leading fingerprint, F(M1)(x), is characterized by global warming, intensified wet–dry patterns and progressive large-scale continental aridification, largely driven by multidecadal increases in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The second fingerprint, F(M2)(x), captures a pronounced interhemispheric temperature contrast, associated meridional shifts in the intertropical convergence zone and correlated anomalies in precipitation and aridity over California, the Sahel and India. F(M2)(x) exhibits nonlinear temporal behaviour: the intertropical convergence zone moves southwards before 1975 in response to increases in hemispherically asymmetric sulfate aerosol emissions, and it shifts northwards after 1975 due to reduced sulfur dioxide emissions and the GHG-induced warming of Northern Hemisphere landmasses. Both fingerprints are statistically identifiable in observations of joint changes in temperature, rainfall and aridity during 1950–2014. We show that the reliable simulation of these changes requires combined forcing by GHGs, direct and indirect effects of aerosols, and large volcanic eruptions. Our results suggest that GHG-induced aridification may be modulated regionally by future reductions in sulfate aerosol emissions.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Robust Anthropogenic Signal Identified in the Seasonal Cycle of Tropospheric Temperature
- Author
-
Benjamin D. Santer, Stephen Po-Chedley, Nicole Feldl, John C. Fyfe, Qiang Fu, Susan Solomon, Mark England, Keith B. Rodgers, Malte F. Stuecker, Carl Mears, Cheng-Zhi Zou, Céline J. W. Bonfils, Giuliana Pallotta, Mark D. Zelinka, Nan Rosenbloom, and Jim Edwards
- Subjects
Atmospheric Science - Abstract
Previous work identified an anthropogenic fingerprint pattern in TAC(x, t), the amplitude of the seasonal cycle of mid- to upper-tropospheric temperature (TMT), but did not explicitly consider whether fingerprint identification in satellite TAC(x, t) data could have been influenced by real-world multidecadal internal variability (MIV). We address this question here using large ensembles (LEs) performed with five climate models. LEs provide many different sequences of internal variability noise superimposed on an underlying forced signal. Despite differences in historical external forcings, climate sensitivity, and MIV properties of the five models, their TAC(x, t) fingerprints are similar and statistically identifiable in 239 of the 240 LE realizations of historical climate change. Comparing simulated and observed variability spectra reveals that consistent fingerprint identification is unlikely to be biased by model underestimates of observed MIV. Even in the presence of large (factor of 3–4) intermodel and inter-realization differences in the amplitude of MIV, the anthropogenic fingerprints of seasonal cycle changes are robustly identifiable in models and satellite data. This is primarily due to the fact that the distinctive, global-scale fingerprint patterns are spatially dissimilar to the smaller-scale patterns of internal TAC(x, t) variability associated with the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation and El Niño–Southern Oscillation. The robustness of the seasonal cycle detection and attribution results shown here, taken together with the evidence from idealized aquaplanet simulations, suggest that basic physical processes are dictating a common pattern of forced TAC(x, t) changes in observations and in the five LEs. The key processes involved include GHG-induced expansion of the tropics, lapse-rate changes, land surface drying, and sea ice decrease.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Internal variability and forcing influence model–satellite differences in the rate of tropical tropospheric warming
- Author
-
Stephen Po-Chedley, John T. Fasullo, Nicholas Siler, Zachary M. Labe, Elizabeth A. Barnes, Céline J. W. Bonfils, and Benjamin D. Santer
- Subjects
Aerosols ,Multidisciplinary ,Climate ,Temperature ,Uncertainty ,Models, Theoretical - Abstract
Climate-model simulations exhibit approximately two times more tropical tropospheric warming than satellite observations since 1979. The causes of this difference are not fully understood and are poorly quantified. Here, we apply machine learning to relate the patterns of surface-temperature change to the forced and unforced components of tropical tropospheric warming. This approach allows us to disentangle the forced and unforced change in the model-simulated temperature of the midtroposphere (TMT). In applying the climate-model-trained machine-learning framework to observations, we estimate that external forcing has produced a tropical TMT trend of 0.25 ± 0.08 K⋅decade −1 between 1979 and 2014, but internal variability has offset this warming by 0.07 ± 0.07 K⋅decade −1 . Using the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2) large ensemble, we also find that a discontinuity in the variability of prescribed biomass-burning aerosol emissions artificially enhances simulated tropical TMT change by 0.04 K⋅decade −1 . The magnitude of this aerosol-forcing bias will vary across climate models, but since the latest generation of climate models all use the same emissions dataset, the bias may systematically enhance climate-model trends over the satellite era. Our results indicate that internal variability and forcing uncertainties largely explain differences in satellite-versus-model warming and are important considerations when evaluating climate models.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Quantification of human contribution to soil moisture-based terrestrial aridity
- Author
-
Yaoping Wang, Jiafu Mao, Forrest M. Hoffman, Céline J. W. Bonfils, Hervé Douville, Mingzhou Jin, Peter E. Thornton, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Xiaoying Shi, Haishan Chen, Stan D. Wullschleger, Shilong Piao, and Yongjiu Dai
- Subjects
Soil ,Multidisciplinary ,General Physics and Astronomy ,Humans ,General Chemistry ,Seasons ,Desiccation ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,Droughts - Abstract
Current knowledge of the spatiotemporal patterns of changes in soil moisture-based terrestrial aridity has considerable uncertainty. Using Standardized Soil Moisture Index (SSI) calculated from multi-source merged data sets, we find widespread drying in the global midlatitudes, and wetting in the northern subtropics and in spring between 45°N–65°N, during 1971–2016. Formal detection and attribution analysis shows that human forcings, especially greenhouse gases, contribute significantly to the changes in 0–10 cm SSI during August–November, and 0–100 cm during September–April. We further develop and apply an emergent constraint method on the future SSI’s signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios and trends under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 5-8.5. The results show continued significant presence of human forcings and more rapid drying in 0–10 cm than 0–100 cm. Our findings highlight the predominant human contributions to spatiotemporally heterogenous terrestrial aridification, providing a basis for drought and flood risk management.
- Published
- 2021
8. Improving seasonal forecast using probabilistic deep learning
- Author
-
Baoxiang Pan, Gemma J. Anderson, André Goncalves, Donald D. Lucas, Céline J. W. Bonfils, and Jiwoo Lee
- Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences ,Physics - Geophysics ,Global and Planetary Change ,Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics ,Statistics - Machine Learning ,Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics (physics.ao-ph) ,FOS: Physical sciences ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Environmental Chemistry ,Machine Learning (stat.ML) ,Physics::Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics ,Geophysics (physics.geo-ph) - Abstract
The path toward realizing the potential of seasonal forecasting and its socioeconomic benefits depends heavily on improving general circulation model based dynamical forecasting systems. To improve dynamical seasonal forecast, it is crucial to set up forecast benchmarks, and clarify forecast limitations posed by model initialization errors, formulation deficiencies, and internal climate variability. With huge cost in generating large forecast ensembles, and limited observations for forecast verification, the seasonal forecast benchmarking and diagnosing task proves challenging. In this study, we develop a probabilistic deep neural network model, drawing on a wealth of existing climate simulations to enhance seasonal forecast capability and forecast diagnosis. By leveraging complex physical relationships encoded in climate simulations, our probabilistic forecast model demonstrates favorable deterministic and probabilistic skill compared to state-of-the-art dynamical forecast systems in quasi-global seasonal forecast of precipitation and near-surface temperature. We apply this probabilistic forecast methodology to quantify the impacts of initialization errors and model formulation deficiencies in a dynamical seasonal forecasting system. We introduce the saliency analysis approach to efficiently identify the key predictors that influence seasonal variability. Furthermore, by explicitly modeling uncertainty using variational Bayes, we give a more definitive answer to how the El Nino/Southern Oscillation, the dominant mode of seasonal variability, modulates global seasonal predictability.
- Published
- 2020
9. Twentieth-century hydroclimate changes consistent with human influence
- Author
-
Kate, Marvel, Benjamin I, Cook, Céline J W, Bonfils, Paul J, Durack, Jason E, Smerdon, and A Park, Williams
- Subjects
Aerosols ,Principal Component Analysis ,Climate Change ,Water ,Human Activities ,History, 20th Century ,Hydrology ,Models, Theoretical ,Plants ,History, 21st Century ,Droughts - Abstract
Although anthropogenic climate change is expected to have caused large shifts in temperature and rainfall, the detection of human influence on global drought has been complicated by large internal variability and the brevity of observational records. Here we address these challenges using reconstructions of the Palmer drought severity index obtained with data from tree rings that span the past millennium. We show that three distinct periods are identifiable in climate models, observations and reconstructions during the twentieth century. In recent decades (1981 to present), the signal of greenhouse gas forcing is present but not yet detectable at high confidence. Observations and reconstructions differ significantly from an expected pattern of greenhouse gas forcing around mid-century (1950-1975), coinciding with a global increase in aerosol forcing. In the first half of the century (1900-1949), however, a signal of greenhouse-gas-forced change is robustly detectable. Multiple observational datasets and reconstructions using data from tree rings confirm that human activities were probably affecting the worldwide risk of droughts as early as the beginning of the twentieth century.
- Published
- 2018
10. Model consensus projections of US regional hydroclimates under greenhouse warming.
- Author
-
Thomas J Phillips, Céline J W Bonfils, and Chengzhu Zhang
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Köppen bioclimatic evaluation of CMIP historical climate simulations.
- Author
-
Thomas J Phillips and Céline J W Bonfils
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.