Search

Background: Ablation index (AI)-guided ablation for posterior wall isolation (PWI) using high-power, short-duration remains untested. We sought to evaluate the acute outcomes of AI-guided 50 W ablation vs. conventional ablation, and investigate the differences in relationship between contact force (CF), time and AI in both groups. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing first-time AI-guided ablation with PWI using either 50 W or 35–40 W ablation were enrolled. Acute procedural metrics and individual lesion level ablation data were compared between groups. Results: 40 patients (50 W: n = 20, 35–40 W: n = 20) with atrial fibrillation were included. Total procedure time was significantly reduced with 50 W (120 vs. 143 mins, p = 0.004) and there was a trend toward decreased ablation time (22 vs. 28 mins, p = 0.052). First pass and acute success of PWI were comparable between the 50 W and 35–40 W groups (10 vs. 8 patients, p = 0.525 and 20 vs. 19 patients, p = 1.000, respectively). Individual lesion analysis of all 959 RF applications (50 W: n = 458, 35–40 W: n = 501) demonstrated that 50 W ablation led to lower ablation time per lesion (10.4 vs. 13.0s, p 600 for roof line; AI>500 elsewhere) were more frequently observed in the 50 W group (9.0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.007). CF had very good discriminative capability for excessive ablation in both groups. At 50 W, limiting the CF to

Background and aimsRight phrenic nerve palsy is the most frequent complication of cryoballoon procedures. The SMARTFREEZE™ console (Boston Scientific, St. Paul, MN, USA) has integrated a new tool for diaphragm monitoring—the Diaphragm Movement Sensor; however, it has not been evaluated in clinical practice. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the Diaphragm Movement Sensor based on compound motor action potential data recorded simultaneously.MethodsThirty consecutive patients (mean age 63.2 ± 10.2 years) were included. We simultaneously recorded the compound motor action potential and the Diaphragm Movement Sensor during cryoapplications in the right pulmonary veins. The right phrenic nerve was paced at 60 per minute, 12 V and 2.9 ms. Compound motor action potential monitoring with a 30% decrease cutoff for the diagnosis of phrenic nerve threatening was considered the gold standard. The Diaphragm Movement Sensor decrease threshold was also set at 30%.ResultsConsidering compound motor action potential monitoring, phrenic nerve threatening occurred 11 times (in seven patients) among 84 cryoapplications (13.1%) at the right pulmonary veins. The sensitivity and specificity of the Diaphragm Movement Sensor were, respectively, 33% (95% CI: 7%–70%) and 49% (95% CI: 38%–61%; P