1. Health systems strengthening to arrest the global disability burden: empirical development of prioritised components for a global strategy for improving musculoskeletal health
- Author
-
Dieter Wiek, Richard Brown, Andrew M Briggs, Saurab Sharma, James Waddell, Anthony D Woolf, Lyn March, Helen Slater, Enrique R Soriano, Kristina E Åkesson, Fiona M Blyth, Ali Mobasheri, Ben Horgan, Helen E Foster, Neil Betteridge, Joanne E Jordan, Anil Jain, Francesca Gimigliano, Nuzhat Ali, Margareta C Nordin, Shuichi Matsuda, Carmen Huckel Schneider, Sarika Parambath, James J Young, Deborah Kopansky-Giles, Swatee Mishrra, Joletta Belton, Demelash Debere, Karsten E Dreinhöfer, Laura Finucane, Scott Haldeman, Syed A Haq, Manjul Joshipura, Asgar A Kalla, Jakob Lothe, Lillian Mwaniki, Marilyn Pattison, Felipe J J Reis, and Heather Tick
- Subjects
Medicine (General) ,R5-920 ,Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 - Abstract
Introduction Despite the profound burden of disease, a strategic global response to optimise musculoskeletal (MSK) health and guide national-level health systems strengthening priorities remains absent. Auspiced by the Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health (G-MUSC), we aimed to empirically derive requisite priorities and components of a strategic response to guide global and national-level action on MSK health.Methods Design: mixed-methods, three-phase design.Phase 1: qualitative study with international key informants (KIs), including patient representatives and people with lived experience. KIs characterised the contemporary landscape for MSK health and priorities for a global strategic response.Phase 2: scoping review of national health policies to identify contemporary MSK policy trends and foci.Phase 3: informed by phases 1–2, was a global eDelphi where multisectoral panellists rated and iterated a framework of priorities and detailed components/actions.Results Phase 1: 31 KIs representing 25 organisations were sampled from 20 countries (40% low and middle income (LMIC)). Inductively derived themes were used to construct a logic model to underpin latter phases, consisting of five guiding principles, eight strategic priority areas and seven accelerators for action.Phase 2: of the 165 documents identified, 41 (24.8%) from 22 countries (88% high-income countries) and 2 regions met the inclusion criteria. Eight overarching policy themes, supported by 47 subthemes, were derived, aligning closely with the logic model.Phase 3: 674 panellists from 72 countries (46% LMICs) participated in round 1 and 439 (65%) in round 2 of the eDelphi. Fifty-nine components were retained with 10 (17%) identified as essential for health systems. 97.6% and 94.8% agreed or strongly agreed the framework was valuable and credible, respectively, for health systems strengthening.Conclusion An empirically derived framework, co-designed and strongly supported by multisectoral stakeholders, can now be used as a blueprint for global and country-level responses to improve MSK health and prioritise system strengthening initiatives.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF