Search

The oncogene PIM2 is upregulated in several malignancies but has never been investigated in mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common type of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (CTCL). PIM2 is a well‐known oncogene and is regulated by cell signaling pathways like the JAK/STAT‐ and NF‐kB‐pathway, key regulators in the pathogenesis of CTCL. The aim of this study was to examine the role of PIM2 in MF. PIM2 gene expression was measured in 81 formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded skin biopsies from patients with MF and 46 control biopsies from healthy skin (HS) and benign inflammatory skin disease (BID). Validation of PIM2 protein expression was performed on selected biopsies with immunohistochemical staining. We found a significant difference in gene expression levels between both early stage MF and HS (p < 0.0001), and BID (p < 0.0001). In addition, the PIM2 gene expression was higher in advanced‐stage MF compared to early stage disease (p = 0.0001). No significant difference in gene expression levels was found between patients with and without disease progression. In conclusion, we found PIM2 expression is significantly increased in MF compared to controls, and in advanced‐stage MF compared to early stage MF. These findings could potentially have diagnostic value in discriminating early stage MF from BID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Melanoma is widely recognized to be an immunogenic tumor that often contains tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the tumor microenvironment. During cancer progression, expression of ligands that bind immune checkpoint (IC) proteins, such as PD-1, expressed on the surface of TILs, hinder them from exerting their antitumor functions. TILs consist of a heterogenous group of immune cells and their presence is associated with an improved overall survival in melanoma patients. Introduction of IC inhibitors has revolutionized management and prognosis of advanced melanoma. Unfortunately, the response rates have continued to be limited, resulting in growing interest in characterizing novel IC proteins, and developing combination therapy that includes inhibitors against multiple IC proteins. Methods: In a regional cohort of 166 patients diagnosed with cutaneous superficial spreading melanoma with different degree of TILs, we investigated the tumor immune-associated gene expression profile using NanoString Technology. We used multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) staining in a subset of tumors (N = 7), combining IC proteins T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) and LAG3 with a melanoma cell marker (SOX10) and immune cell markers (CD8 [cytotoxic T cells], CD4 [T helper cells], FOXP3 [regulatory T cells/Tregs], PAX5 [B cells], and CD56 [NK/NKT cells]) and IC protein PD-1. Results: We found upregulation of 91 differentially expressed genes, including IC proteins, LAG3 and TIGIT in melanomas with brisk TILs compared to tumors where TILs were absent. mIF staining revealed LAG3 and TIGIT expression in the majority of CD8+ T cells. Only few Tregs and CD4+ T cells expressed LAG3, whereas majority of them expressed TIGIT. LAG3 and TIGIT were expressed in a small fraction of the NK/NKT cells and lacked in the B cells. The majority of PD-1+ cells co-localized with LAG3 and TIGIT. Conclusion: We report a variable expression of LAG3 and TIGIT on TILs subtypes and a coeval occurrence with PD-1. This knowledge places LAG3 and TIGIT in spatial and cellular context in melanoma. The data suggest that targeting multiple IC proteins might help overcome the current challenges with IC therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Superficial spreading melanomas (SSMs) are the most common type of melanoma and cause the majority of skin cancer deaths. More than 50% of cases harbor a mutation in the BRAF gene that activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cancer signaling pathway. BRAFV600E is the most common BRAF mutation, and it represents an important biomarker that guides treatment selection. However, the relationship between the BRAFV600E gene expression and intratumoral protein distribution, on one side, and clinicopathological factors and patient outcomes, on the other, is not fully described. Additionally, whether MAPK cancer signaling activation in melanoma is due to increased biochemical activity of BRAFV600E, increased mRNA levels, or both requires further investigation. Here, we addressed these questions by examining expression patterns of BRAFV600E in primary treatment-naive melanomas and correlating them to clinicopathological factors and patient outcomes. Methods: In 166 SSM cases, we performed immunohistochemical staining to investigate the protein expression of BRAFV600E, and we measured BRAF mRNA levels using NanoString nCounter system. Results: Ninety-seven (49%) melanomas stained positive for BRAFV600E, with nearly 100% intratumoral homogeneity observed. Positive BRAFV600E expression was significantly associated with nonrecurrent disease and was found to be an independent predictor of better prognosis in univariate and multivariable analyses. Furthermore, presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, sentinel lymph node biopsy negativity, and low Breslow thickness were all independent predictors of better prognosis. We observed no difference in the BRAF mRNA levels in BRAFV600E-negative and BRAFV600E-positive melanomas, respectively. Validation in a larger publicly available cohort confirmed that there is only a weak correlation (Spearman 0.4) between BRAFV600E mRNA and protein levels and no differences in mRNA between BRAFV600E mutated and non-mutated patients. Conclusion: Our findings indicated that BRAFV600E is homogeneously present throughout the whole tumor and is associated with nonrecurrent disease and better survival in primary melanoma. We also showed that BRAFV600E mutation does not result in higher transcriptional levels, suggesting that activation of the MAPK signaling pathway in BRAFV600E mutated patients can be attributed to the increased biochemical activity caused by the mutation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]