189 results on '"Butterly, Lynn F."'
Search Results
2. Cecal intubation rates: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
3. Association between Colonoscopy Sedation Type and Polyp Detection: A Registry-based Cohort Study
4. Endoscopist adenomas-per-colonoscopy detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
5. What do ‘false-positive’ stool tests really mean? Data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry
6. Does Screening Colonoscopy Have a Future in the United States?
7. Association of endoscopist colonoscopy quality measures with follow-up colonoscopy outcomes after positive stool tests (mt-sDNA or FIT): Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
8. Prevalence of neoplasia at colonoscopy among testicular cancer survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy
9. Prevalence of neoplasia at colonoscopy among testicular cancer survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy
10. Proven Strategies for Increasing Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening
11. Young adults and metachronous neoplasia: risks for future advanced adenomas and large serrated polyps compared with older adults
12. Prevalence of neoplasia at colonoscopy among testicular cancer survivors treated with platinum‐based chemotherapy
13. Endoscopist Adenoma Per Colonoscopy Detection Rates and Risk for Post Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Data From New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
14. Assessing Risk of Index Serrated Polyps
15. Association of small versus diminutive adenomas and the risk for metachronous advanced adenomas: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
16. Assessing Risk of Index Serrated Polyps.
17. Risk Factors for Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer at a Late Stage: a Population-Based Study
18. Higher Serrated Polyp Detection Rates Are Associated With Lower Risk of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
19. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
20. Using New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data to assess United States and European post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines
21. Supplementary Table from Colonoscopy Findings in FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ Patients versus in Colonoscopy-only Patients: New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Data
22. Data from Colonoscopy Findings in FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ Patients versus in Colonoscopy-only Patients: New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Data
23. Response
24. Impact of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Quality on Follow-up Interval Recommendations for Average-risk Patients With Normal Screening Colonoscopies: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
25. What Do ‘False-Positive’ Stool Tests Really Mean? Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
26. Serrated Polyp Yield at Colonoscopy in Patients with Positive FIT, Positive mt-sDNA, and Colonoscopy Only: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
27. S254 What Do "False-Positive" Stool Tests Really Mean? Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
28. S193 Use of Data From All Exams versus Screening Only to Calculate Serrated Polyp Detection Rates: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
29. S251 Serrated Polyps in Patients With Positive FIT or Mt-sDNA, or Colonoscopy Only: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
30. S587 High Quality Index Colonoscopies Decrease the Risk for Advanced Outcomes at 10-Year Follow-Up Colonoscopy in Low-Risk Patients With No Index Adenomas or Serrated Polyps
31. Clinically significant serrated polyp detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
32. Distinct patterns of DNA methylation in conventional adenomas involving the right and left colon
33. Adenoma Detection Rates for Screening Colonoscopies in Smokers and Obese Adults: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
34. Differences in Detection Rates of Adenomas and Serrated Polyps in Screening Versus Surveillance Colonoscopies, Based on the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
35. Serrated Polyp Yield at Colonoscopy in Patients with Positive FIT, Positive mt-sDNA, and Colonoscopy Only: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
36. Colonoscopy Findings in FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ Patients versus in Colonoscopy-only Patients: New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Data
37. Withdrawal Time: Is Nine the New Six?
38. Matching colonoscopy and pathology data in population-based registries: development of a novel algorithm and the initial experience of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
39. Colonoscopy: Quality Indicators
40. Risk for individuals with index small (<1 cm) hyperplastic polyps
41. Inclusion of Carcinoids in Early Onset Colorectal Tumor Incidence Rates: Adenocarcinoma in Young Adults Still the Major Problem
42. Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals With Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Tests
43. Perception of Colonoscopy Benefits: A Gap in Patient Knowledge?
44. Improving the Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Assessment of Familial Risk
45. Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals With Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Tests: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
46. Why is colorectal cancer increasing in younger age groups in the United States?
47. Prevalence of Clinically Important Histology in Small Adenomas
48. S0337 Increased Risk of Left-Sided Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia but Not Serrated Polyps in Adults Less Than 50 Years Who Present With Bleeding: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
49. S0321 Comparison of Risk Factors and Metachronous Lesions in Individuals With Sessile Serrated Polyps vs Hyperplastic Polyps: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
50. Colonoscopy Outcomes in Average-Risk Screening Equivalent Young Adults: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.