Search

Combining PD-L1 blockade with inhibition of oncogenic mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling may result in long-lasting responses in patients with advanced melanoma. This phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation and -expansion study (NCT02027961) investigated safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) combined with dabrafenib (BRAF inhibitor) and trametinib (MEK inhibitor) for patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma (cohort A, n = 26), or durvalumab and trametinib given concomitantly (cohort B, n = 20) or sequentially (cohort C, n = 22) for patients with BRAF-wild type melanoma. Adverse events and treatment discontinuation rates were more common than previously reported for these agents given as monotherapy. Objective responses were observed in 69.2% (cohort A), 20.0% (cohort B) and 31.8% (cohort C) of patients, with evidence of improved tumor immune infiltration and durable responses in a subset of patients with available biopsy samples. In conclusion, combined MAPK inhibition and anti-PD-L1 therapy may provide treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma.

PurposeThe surface receptor MET is highly expressed on primary uveal melanoma; MET inhibitors demonstrated early clinical signals of efficacy in slowing uveal melanoma growth. The primary objective of our study was to compare the progression-free survival rate at 4 months (PFS4) of patients with uveal melanoma treated with cabozantinib or chemotherapy.Patients and methodsPatients with metastatic uveal melanoma and RECIST measurable disease were randomized 2:1 to receive either cabozantinib (arm 1) versus temozolomide or dacarbazine (arm 2) with restaging imaging every two cycles. Cross-over from arm 2 to cabozantinib after progression was allowed (arm 2X). Available tumor specimens were analyzed by whole-exome sequencing (WES) and results were correlated with outcome.ResultsForty-six eligible patients were accrued with 31, 15, and 9 in arms 1, 2, and 2X, respectively. Median lines of prior therapy, including hepatic embolization, were two. Rates of PFS4 in arm 1 and arm 2 were 32.3% and 26.7% (P = 0.35), respectively, with median PFS time of 60 and 59 days (P = 0.964; HR = 0.99). Median overall survival (OS) was 6.4 months and 7.3 months (P = 0.580; HR = 1.21), respectively. Grade 3-4 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were present in 61.3%, 46.7%, and 37.5% in arms 1, 2, and 2X, respectively. WES demonstrated a mean tumor mutational burden of 1.53 mutations/Mb and did not separate OS ≤ or >1 year (P = 0.14). Known mutations were identified by WES and novel mutations were nominated.ConclusionsMET/VEGFR blockade with cabozantinib demonstrated no improvement in PFS but an increase in toxicity relative to temozolomide/dacarbazine in metastatic uveal melanoma.

Objective: Stage 3 patients with clinically positive nodal metastasis are treated with therapeutic neck dissection and adjuvant systemic therapy. The aim of our study was to examined the predictability of pre‐operative CT as a nodal drainage assessment tool. Methods: Retrospective review of all patients with clinically positive head and neck cutaneous melanoma between 2010 and 2019. Clinical disease was diagnosed as radiological suspicious, biopsy‐proven node. A pre‐operative CT evaluation for nodal metastasis was compared to pathology report. Results: A total of 53 patients were included. Forty patients (75.5%) were males with a mean age of 59 (SD 15.52). The majority of patients (26.4%) had an unknown primary site. The most common sites for primary were the cheek in eight patients (15.1%) followed by forehead (9.4%) and lateral neck (9.4%). Preoperative CT predicted nodal disease in 84.6% of cases. The primary region that mainly failed from the previously described clinical prediction was the upper anterior neck with 83.3% parotid involvement. A total of 10 patients (18.9%) were diagnosis with non‐clinical nodes on pathology with a median non‐clinical node of 1 (range 1–2). Of them, 9 (90%) were in the same clinical levels detected by CT. Pre‐operative CT was associated with a neck level accuracy of 98.1%. Conclusion: Stage 3 head and neck melanoma with clinically positive nodal metastasis that are eligible for an adjuvant systemic treatment, may benefit from a highly selective neck dissection according to their pre‐operative imaging studies. This should be further evaluated in a large‐scale clinical trial. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:4292–4297, 2024 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Not until the turn of this century has immunotherapy become a fundamental component of cancer treatment. While monotherapy with immune modulators, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, provides a subset of patients with durable clinical benefit and possible cure, combination therapy offers the potential for antitumor activity in a greater number of patients. The field of immunology has provided us with a plethora of potential molecules and pathways to target. This abundance makes it impractical to empirically test all possible combinations efficiently. We recommend that potential immunotherapy combinations be chosen based on sound rationale and available data to address the mechanisms of primary and acquired immune resistance. Novel trial designs may increase the proportion of patients receiving potentially efficacious treatments and, at the same time, better define the balance of clinical activity and safety. We believe that implementing a strategic approach in the early development of immunotherapy combinations will expedite the delivery of more effective therapies with improved safety and durable outcomes.

Simple Summary: Historically, patients undergoing complete lymphadenectomy (CLD) for clinically evident nodal disease were candidates to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), with the goal of reducing the risk of lymph node basin (LNB) relapse. However, most recent systemic therapy (ST) trials investigating adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have excluded patients who had received adjuvant RT prior to ST. Therefore, the role of this therapy is under-investigated, and patients who may have previously received adjuvant RT may now be receiving adjuvant ST and forgoing adjuvant RT. We observed that there was a significant shift away from the use of radiotherapy toward systemic therapies after 2015 compared to before 2015 in a population that met indications for radiotherapy. We further found that the LNB recurrence rate was similar between those treated with adjuvant RT and ST, and ST was associated with a reduced incidence of any recurrence or progression compared to adjuvant RT. Modern adjuvant systemic therapies (STs) have revolutionized the management of stage III melanoma. Currently, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) remains unclear. In this single-center retrospective study, patients with clinically detectable stage III melanoma with high-risk features for lymph node basin (LNB) recurrence and whose tumors were fully resected with complete lymphadenectomy (CLD) between 2010 and 2019 were assessed. We determined the cumulative incidence (CIF) of LNB recurrence and any disease recurrence or progression using competing risk analysis. A total of 108 patients were identified; the median age was 59 years (24–92), and 74 (69%) were men. A total of 51 (42%) received adjuvant RT, 22 (20%) received adjuvant ST, and 35 (32%) received no adjuvant therapy. The advent of ST changed clinical practice, with a significant increase in the use of adjuvant ST and a decrease in the use of RT when comparing practice patterns before and after 2015 (p < 0.001). The 3-year CIF of LNB recurrence was similar in patients treated with adjuvant RT (6.3%) and adjuvant ST (9.8%). The 3-year CIF of any disease recurrence or progression was lower in patients receiving adjuvant ST (24%) compared to those receiving adjuvant RT (52%) or no adjuvant therapy (55%, p = 0.06). Three-year overall survival (OS) was not significantly different in patients treated with ST compared to those not treated with any ST (p = 0.118). Despite ST replacing RT as the dominant adjuvant treatment modality, this change in practice has not resulted in increased LNB recurrence for patients at high risk of LNB recurrence following CLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Author(s): Yuki Kagoya [1]; Shinya Tanaka [1, 2]; Tingxi Guo [1, 3]; Mark Anczurowski [1, 3]; Chung-Hsi Wang [1, 3]; Kayoko Saso [1]; Marcus O Butler [1, 3, 4]; Mark [...]