20 results on '"Burdfield‐Steel, Emily R."'
Search Results
2. The causes and consequences of reproductive interference in the Lygaeidae
- Author
-
Burdfield-Steel, Emily R. and Shuker, David M.
- Subjects
595.7 ,Reproductive interference ,Sexual selection - Abstract
Reproductive interference occurs when individuals direct sexual behaviours towards other species and this causes a reduction in the fitness of one or both of the participants. While initially considered to be little more than an aberration, reproductive interference is increasingly recognised, not just as a factor in determining species co-existence and community dynamics, but also as an opportunity to further our understanding of sexual selection. In this thesis I investigate the causes and consequences of reproductive interference between several species of true bugs (Order: Hemiptera) in the family Lygaeidae. These species have a polgynandrous mating system, in which both males and females mate multiple times. I found that the interspecific mating attempts often witnessed in these bugs is likely a consequence of this mating system, as potential cues for species discrimination, in the form of cuticular hydrocarbons, are available and can be utilised by the bugs in some contexts. This is further supported by the finding that pre-copulatory selection on factors such as diet and chemical protection are weak in these insects. Furthermore, my work highlights the context-dependant nature of both the fitness costs associated with reproductive interference, and also of the bugs' intra-specific behaviour. When housed in groups, female Lygaeus equestris did not show consistent fitness losses in response to harassment by either conspecific or heterospecific males, despite previous evidence showing that such males inflict costs on both egg production and longevity when interacting one-to-one. This, combined with the finding that male L. equestris alter their mate-guarding behaviour in the presence of other males, highlights the potential of behavioural flexibility to influence the outcome of inter-species interactions, and the importance of context when attempting to measure phenomena such as reproductive interference.
- Published
- 2012
3. The evolution and ecology of multiple antipredator defences
- Author
-
Kikuchi, David W., primary, Allen, William L., additional, Arbuckle, Kevin, additional, Aubier, Thomas G., additional, Briolat, Emmanuelle S., additional, Burdfield‐Steel, Emily R., additional, Cheney, Karen L., additional, Daňková, Klára, additional, Elias, Marianne, additional, Hämäläinen, Liisa, additional, Herberstein, Marie E., additional, Hossie, Thomas J., additional, Joron, Mathieu, additional, Kunte, Krushnamegh, additional, Leavell, Brian C., additional, Lindstedt, Carita, additional, Lorioux‐Chevalier, Ugo, additional, McClure, Melanie, additional, McLellan, Callum F., additional, Medina, Iliana, additional, Nawge, Viraj, additional, Páez, Erika, additional, Pal, Arka, additional, Pekár, Stano, additional, Penacchio, Olivier, additional, Raška, Jan, additional, Reader, Tom, additional, Rojas, Bibiana, additional, Rönkä, Katja H., additional, Rößler, Daniela C., additional, Rowe, Candy, additional, Rowland, Hannah M., additional, Roy, Arlety, additional, Schaal, Kaitlin A., additional, Sherratt, Thomas N., additional, Skelhorn, John, additional, Smart, Hannah R., additional, Stankowich, Ted, additional, Stefan, Amanda M., additional, Summers, Kyle, additional, Taylor, Christopher H., additional, Thorogood, Rose, additional, Umbers, Kate, additional, Winters, Anne E., additional, Yeager, Justin, additional, and Exnerová, Alice, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. The evolution and ecology of multiple antipredator defences
- Author
-
Kikuchi, David W., Allen, William L., Arbuckle, Kevin, Aubier, Thomas G., Briolat, Emmanuelle S., Burdfield‐Steel, Emily R., Cheney, Karen L., Daňková, Klára, Elias, Marianne, Hämäläinen, Liisa, Herberstein, Marie E., Hossie, Thomas J., Joron, Mathieu, Kunte, Krushnamegh, Leavell, Brian C., Lindstedt, Carita, Lorioux‐Chevalier, Ugo, McClure, Melanie, McLellan, Callum F., Medina, Iliana, Nawge, Viraj, Páez, Erika, Pal, Arka, Pekár, Stano, Penacchio, Olivier, Raška, Jan, Reader, Tom, Rojas, Bibiana, Rönkä, Katja H., Rößler, Daniela C., Rowe, Candy, Rowland, Hannah M., Roy, Arlety, Schaal, Kaitlin A., Sherratt, Thomas N., Skelhorn, John, Smart, Hannah R., Stankowich, Ted, Stefan, Amanda M., Summers, Kyle, Taylor, Christopher H., Thorogood, Rose, Umbers, Kate, Winters, Anne E., Yeager, Justin, and Exnerová, Alice
- Subjects
saaliseläimet ,vuorovaikutus ,predation sequence ,defence portfolio ,antergy ,synergy ,defence syndrome ,secondary defences ,saalistus ,eläintiede ,trade-offs ,intraspecific variation ,antergy , defence portfolio , defence syndrome , intraspecific variation , predation sequence , predator cognition, secondary defences , synergy ,petoeläimet ,synergia ,puolustus ,predator cognition - Abstract
Prey seldom rely on a single type of antipredator defence, often using multiple defences to avoid predation. In many cases, selection in different contexts may favour the evolution of multiple defences in a prey. However, a prey may use multiple defences to protect itself during a single predator encounter. Such “defence portfolios” that defend prey against a single instance of predation are distributed across and within successive stages of the predation sequence (encounter, detection, identification, approach (attack), subjugation and consumption). We contend that at present, our understanding of defence portfolio evolution is incomplete, and seen from the fragmentary perspective of specific sensory systems (e.g., visual) or specific types of defences (especially aposematism). In this review, we aim to build a comprehensive framework for conceptualizing the evolution of multiple prey defences, beginning with hypotheses for the evolution of multiple defences in general, and defence portfolios in particular. We then examine idealized models of resource trade-offs and functional interactions between traits, along with evidence supporting them. We find that defence portfolios are constrained by resource allocation to other aspects of life history, as well as functional incompatibilities between different defences. We also find that selection is likely to favour combinations of defences that have synergistic effects on predator behaviour and prey survival. Next, we examine specific aspects of prey ecology, genetics and development, and predator cognition that modify the predictions of current hypotheses or introduce competing hypotheses. We outline schema for gathering data on the distribution of prey defences across species and geography, determining how multiple defences are produced, and testing the proximate mechanisms by which multiple prey defences impact predator behaviour. Adopting these approaches will strengthen our understanding of multiple defensive strategies. peerReviewed
- Published
- 2023
5. Experimental reduction of intromittent organ length reduces male reproductive success in a bug
- Author
-
Dougherty, Liam R., Rahman, Imran A., Burdfield-Steel, Emily R., Greenway, E. V. (Ginny), and Shuker, David M.
- Published
- 2015
6. The extent and costs of reproductive interference among four species of true bug
- Author
-
Shuker, David M., Currie, Niall, Hoole, Tara, and Burdfield-Steel, Emily R.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Experimental evolution of a pheromone signal
- Author
-
Blankers, Thomas, primary, Fruitet, Elise, additional, Burdfield-Steel, Emily R., additional, and Groot, Astrid, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Mate-guarding in a promiscuous insect: species discrimination influences context-dependent behaviour
- Author
-
Burdfield-Steel, Emily R. and Shuker, David M.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Do the benefits of polyandry scale with outbreeding?
- Author
-
Burdfield-Steel, Emily R., Auty, Sam, and Shuker, David M.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Special Issue: Ecology of Sex and Sexual Communication in Insects
- Author
-
Burdfield-Steel, Emily R., primary and Harari, Ally Rachel, additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Diversity in warning coloration: selective paradox or the norm?
- Author
-
Briolat, Emmanuelle S., Burdfield‐Steel, Emily R., Paul, Sarah C., Rönkä, Katja H., Seymoure, Brett M., Stankowich, Theodore, Stuckert, Adam M. M., Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, and Evolution, Sociality & Behaviour
- Subjects
varoitusväri ,polytypism ,FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SELECTION ,Models, Biological ,SEXUAL SELECTION ,polymorphism ,POLYMORPHIC MULLERIAN MIMICRY ,Sex Factors ,monimuotoisuus ,Animals ,aposematism ,Ecosystem ,GRAPHOSOMA-LINEATUM HETEROPTERA ,Polymorphism, Genetic ,INDO-WEST PACIFIC ,EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE ,Biological Mimicry ,Age Factors ,Temperature ,POISON FROGS ,Original Articles ,Biodiversity ,Pigments, Biological ,Biological Evolution ,CORAL-SNAKE PATTERN ,continuous variation ,muuntelu ,Biological Variation, Population ,Predatory Behavior ,1181 Ecology, evolutionary biology ,HISTORY TRADE-OFFS ,Original Article ,HELICONIUS BUTTERFLIES - Abstract
Aposematic theory has historically predicted that predators should select for warning signals to converge on a single form, as a result of frequency-dependent learning. However, widespread variation in warning signals is observed across closely related species, populations and, most problematically for evolutionary biologists, among individuals in the same population. Recent research has yielded an increased awareness of this diversity, challenging the paradigm of signal monomorphy in aposematic animals. Here we provide a comprehensive synthesis of these disparate lines of investigation, identifying within them three broad classes of explanation for variation in aposematic warning signals: genetic mechanisms, differences among predators and predator behaviour, and alternative selection pressures upon the signal. The mechanisms producing warning coloration are also important. Detailed studies of the genetic basis of warning signals in some species, most notably Heliconius butterflies, are beginning to shed light on the genetic architecture facilitating or limiting key processes such as the evolution and maintenance of polymorphisms, hybridisation, and speciation. Work on predator behaviour is changing our perception of the predator community as a single homogenous selective agent, emphasising the dynamic nature of predator-prey interactions. Predator variability in a range of factors (e.g. perceptual abilities, tolerance to chemical defences, and individual motivation), suggests that the role of predators is more complicated than previously appreciated. With complex selection regimes at work, polytypisms and polymorphisms may even occur in Mullerian mimicry systems. Meanwhile, phenotypes are often multifunctional, and thus subject to additional biotic and abiotic selection pressures. Some of these selective pressures, primarily sexual selection and thermoregulation, have received considerable attention, while others, such as disease risk and parental effects, offer promising avenues to explore. As well as reviewing the existing evidence from both empirical studies and theoretical modelling, we highlight hypotheses that could benefit from further investigation in aposematic species. Finally by collating known instances of variation in warning signals, we provide a valuable resource for understanding the taxonomic spread of diversity in aposematic signalling and with which to direct future research. A greater appreciation of the extent of variation in aposematic species, and of the selective pressures and constraints which contribute to this once-paradoxical phenomenon, yields a new perspective for the field of aposematic signalling.
- Published
- 2019
12. Diversity in warning coloration: selective paradox or the norm?
- Author
-
Briolat, Emmanuelle S., primary, Burdfield-Steel, Emily R., additional, Paul, Sarah C., additional, Rönkä, Katja H., additional, Seymoure, Brett M., additional, Stankowich, Theodore, additional, and Stuckert, Adam M. M., additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Divergence is not speciation, or why we need females: a comment on Tinghitella et al.
- Author
-
Burdfield-Steel, Emily R, primary and Shuker, David M, additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Reproductive interference in insects
- Author
-
SHUKER, DAVID M., primary and BURDFIELD-STEEL, EMILY R., additional
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. The evolutionary ecology of the Lygaeidae
- Author
-
Burdfield-Steel, Emily R., primary and Shuker, David M., additional
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Variation in social and sexual behaviour in four species of aposematic seed bugs (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae): The role of toxic and non-toxic food
- Author
-
Burdfield-Steel, Emily R., primary, Dougherty, Liam R., additional, Smith, Lynsey A., additional, Collins, Laura A., additional, and Shuker, David M., additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Sexual stereotypes: the case of sexual cannibalism
- Author
-
Dougherty, Liam R., primary, Burdfield-Steel, Emily R., additional, and Shuker, David M., additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Reproductive interference
- Author
-
Burdfield-Steel, Emily R., primary and Shuker, David M., additional
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Environment and Local Substrate Availability Effects on Harem Formation in a Polygynous Bark Beetle.
- Author
-
Griffin, Melissa J., Symonds, Matthew R. E., Harari, Ally Rachel, and Burdfield-Steel, Emily R.
- Subjects
BARK beetles ,OVIPARITY ,BEETLES ,TRAFFIC safety ,POPULATION density ,CURCULIONIDAE ,POLYGYNY - Abstract
Simple Summary: Harem polygyny is a mating system where a single male defends a group of females for the purpose of securing multiple mating. While this mating system is well-known in mammals it is uncommon in insect groups. The mating aggregations that occur in insect groups may be driven by environmental conditions or resources available for feeding and breeding. We aimed to determine how the local availability of breeding substrate affects the formation of harems in the five-spined bark beetle, Ips grandicollis. Aggregations are formed when a male bores under the bark of felled pine trees and makes a nuptial chamber. The male then releases an aggregation pheromone that attracts females for mating and other males to also exploit the resource. When the population density was higher the number of females associated with each male was greater. The population density was determined by environmental circumstances with higher density in a pine plantation that was being harvested than in a plantation that was still standing. The amount of substrate (logs per replicate pile) available to the bark beetles also influences the number of beetles attracted to a log and size of individual harems. The environment and local substrate availability did not affect how females distribute themselves around the male. Females did not actively avoid positioning themselves further from neighbouring females to avoid competition. Their arrangement within harems was equivalent to random positioning. Many forms of polygyny are observed across different animal groups. In some species, groups of females may remain with a single male for breeding, often referred to as "harem polygyny". The environment and the amount of habitat available for feeding, mating and oviposition may have an effect on the formation of harems. We aimed to determine how the surrounding environment (a harvested or unharvested pine plantation) and availability of local substrate affect the harems of the bark beetle, Ips grandicollis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). In a harvested pine plantation with large amounts of available habitat, the population density of these beetles is much higher than in unharvested plantations. We found the number of females per male to be significantly greater in the harvested plantation than the unharvested one. Additionally, the amount of substrate available in the immediate local vicinity (the number of logs in replicate piles) also influences the number of beetles attracted to a log and size of individual harems. We also examined how females were distributing themselves in their galleries around the males' nuptial chamber, as previous work has demonstrated the potential for competition between neighbouring females and their offspring. Females do not perform clumping, suggesting some avoidance when females make their galleries, but they also do not distribute themselves evenly. Female distribution around the male's nuptial chamber appears to be random, and not influenced by other females or external conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Diversity in warning coloration: selective paradox or the norm?
- Author
-
Briolat ES, Burdfield-Steel ER, Paul SC, Rönkä KH, Seymoure BM, Stankowich T, and Stuckert AMM
- Subjects
- Age Factors, Animals, Biological Evolution, Ecosystem, Models, Biological, Pigments, Biological genetics, Polymorphism, Genetic, Sex Factors, Temperature, Biodiversity, Biological Mimicry physiology, Biological Variation, Population genetics, Pigments, Biological physiology, Predatory Behavior physiology
- Abstract
Aposematic theory has historically predicted that predators should select for warning signals to converge on a single form, as a result of frequency-dependent learning. However, widespread variation in warning signals is observed across closely related species, populations and, most problematically for evolutionary biologists, among individuals in the same population. Recent research has yielded an increased awareness of this diversity, challenging the paradigm of signal monomorphy in aposematic animals. Here we provide a comprehensive synthesis of these disparate lines of investigation, identifying within them three broad classes of explanation for variation in aposematic warning signals: genetic mechanisms, differences among predators and predator behaviour, and alternative selection pressures upon the signal. The mechanisms producing warning coloration are also important. Detailed studies of the genetic basis of warning signals in some species, most notably Heliconius butterflies, are beginning to shed light on the genetic architecture facilitating or limiting key processes such as the evolution and maintenance of polymorphisms, hybridisation, and speciation. Work on predator behaviour is changing our perception of the predator community as a single homogenous selective agent, emphasising the dynamic nature of predator-prey interactions. Predator variability in a range of factors (e.g. perceptual abilities, tolerance to chemical defences, and individual motivation), suggests that the role of predators is more complicated than previously appreciated. With complex selection regimes at work, polytypisms and polymorphisms may even occur in Müllerian mimicry systems. Meanwhile, phenotypes are often multifunctional, and thus subject to additional biotic and abiotic selection pressures. Some of these selective pressures, primarily sexual selection and thermoregulation, have received considerable attention, while others, such as disease risk and parental effects, offer promising avenues to explore. As well as reviewing the existing evidence from both empirical studies and theoretical modelling, we highlight hypotheses that could benefit from further investigation in aposematic species. Finally by collating known instances of variation in warning signals, we provide a valuable resource for understanding the taxonomic spread of diversity in aposematic signalling and with which to direct future research. A greater appreciation of the extent of variation in aposematic species, and of the selective pressures and constraints which contribute to this once-paradoxical phenomenon, yields a new perspective for the field of aposematic signalling., (© 2018 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.