Search

Background: Biventricular pacing (BVP) appears to confer more pronounced advantages in women, yet the impact of conduction system pacing (CSP) remains insufficiently characterized. This investigation seeks to elucidate sex-specific disparities in clinical outcomes among patients with typical left bundle branch block (LBBB) undergoing CSP, with a particular focus on assessing contributory factors., Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, exhibiting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, and manifesting typical LBBB as Strauss criteria, underwent CSP. Subsequent longitudinal monitoring assessed improvements in LVEF and the composite endpoint of mortality or heart failure hospitalization (HFH)., Results: Among the included 176 patients, women (n = 84, mean age: 69.5 ± 8.8 years) displayed smaller heart size (LVEDd, 62.0 ± 8.3 mm vs. 64.8 ± 7.9 mm, P = 0.023) and shorter baseline QRSd (163.5 ± 17.7 ms vs. 169.7 ± 15.1 ms; P = 0.013) than men. Of the 171 patients who completed the follow-up, super-response was observed in 120 (70%), with a higher occurrence in women than men (78.3% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.024). The incidence of death or HFH was numerically lower in women (7.1% Vs 13%, Log-rank P = 0.216). Notably, the super-response showed a significant difference in women compared to men at the same electrocardiography and/or echocardiographic parameters value. Mediation analysis between sex and super-response revealed that LVEDd and pQRSd play an intermediary role, with the mediation proportion of 26.07% and 27.98%, respectively., Conclusions: Women may derive more benefits from CSP, and pQRSd and LVEDd partly drive this difference., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declared no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may be an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to compare the acute hemodynamic and ECG effects of LBBAP, BVP, and left bundle-optimized therapy CRT (LOT-CRT) in CRT candidates with advanced conduction disease., Methods: In this multicenter study, 48 patients with either nonspecific interventricular conduction delay (n=29) or left bundle branch block (n=19) underwent acute hemodynamic testing to determine the change in left ventricular pressure maximal first derivative (LV d P /d t max ) from baseline atrial pacing to BVP, LBBAP, or LOT-CRT., Results: Atrioventricular-optimized increases in LV d P /d t max for LOT-CRT (mean, 25.8% [95% CI, 20.9%-30.7%]) and BVP (26.4% [95% CI, 20.2%-32.6%]) were greater than unipolar LBBAP (19.3% [95% CI, 15.0%-23.7%]) or bipolar LBBAP (16.4% [95% CI, 12.7%-20.0%]; P ≤0.005). QRS shortening was greater in LOT-CRT (29.5 [95% CI, 23.4-35.6] ms) than unipolar LBBAP (11.9 [95% CI, 6.1-17.7] ms), bipolar LBBAP (11.7 ms [95% CI, 6.4-17.0]), or BVP (18.5 [95% CI, 11.0-25.9] ms), all P ≤0.005. Compared with patients with left bundle branch block, patients with interventricular conduction delay experienced less QRS reduction ( P =0.026) but similar improvements in LV d P /d t max ( P =0.29). Bipolar LBBAP caused anodal capture in 54% of patients and resulted in less LV d P /d t max improvement than unipolar LBBAP (18.6% versus 23.7%; P <0.001). Subclassification of LBBAP capture (European Heart Rhythm Association criteria) indicated LBBAP or LV septal pacing in 27 patients (56%) and deep septal pacing in 21 patients (44%). The hemodynamic benefit of adding left ventricular coronary vein pacing to LBBAP depended on baseline QRS duration ( P =0.031) and success of LBBAP ( P <0.004): LOT-CRT provided 14.5% (5.0%-24.1%) greater LV d P /d t max improvement and 20.8 (12.8-28.8) ms greater QRS shortening than LBBAP in subjects with QRS ≥171 ms and deep septal pacing capture type., Conclusions: In a CRT cohort with advanced conduction disease, LOT-CRT and BVP provided greater acute hemodynamic benefit than LBBAP. Subjects with wider QRS or deep septal pacing are more likely to benefit from the addition of a left ventricular coronary vein lead to implement LOT-CRT., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04905290., Competing Interests: Dr Jastrzębski: speaker/consultant honoraria from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr Foley: consultant to Medtronic, proctor for Medtronic. Dr Chandrasekaran: honoraria, consultancy fees and funding support from Medtronic, Biotronik, and Abbot. Dr Whinnett: speaker honoraria, consulting fees, and institutional fellowship/research support from Abbot, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr Vijayaraman: Medtronic: honoraria, consultant, research and fellowship support Abbott: honoraria, consultant Boston Scientific/Biotronik: honoraria; patent: HBP delivery tool. Dr Upadhyay: consulting and speaker honoraria from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare, Medtronic, Philips, Rhythm Science, and Zoll Medical. R.D. Schaller: speaking honoraria for Medtronic. Dr Richardson: consulting and speaking honoraria from Medtronic, Inc. Dr Herweg: fellowship support from Medtronic, speaker for Medtronic and Abbott. Dr Stadler, D. Kudlik, R. Waxman, Dr Zimmerman, J. Burrell, and Dr Cornelussen are Medtronic employees. The other authors report no conflicts

Background: For the initial treatment strategy for patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) indications, whether to choose left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) or biventricular pacing (BVP) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of LBBaP and BVP in heart failure (HF) patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB)., Methods: This observational study included HF patients with LBBB who underwent successful LBBaP or BVP. The primary outcomes were echocardiographic response (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] increase ≥5%), LVEF improvement, hospitalization costs, and CER (CER = cost/echocardiographic response rate). Secondary outcomes included other echocardiographic parameters, New York Heart Association (NYHA), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), pacemaker parameters, complications, ventricular arrhythmia (VA) events, HF hospitalization (HFH), and all-cause mortality., Results: A total of 130 patients (85 LBBaP and 45 BVP) were included (65.6 ± 10.0 years, 70.77% men). The median follow-up period was 16(12,30), months. Compared with BVP, the LBBaP group showed a greater increase in LVEF (20.2% ± 11.8% vs. 10.5% ± 13.9%; p < 0.001), higher echocardiographic response rate (86.1% vs. 57.8%; p < 0.001), and lower hospitalization costs [$9707.7 (7751.2, 18,088.5) vs. $20,046.1 (18,840.1, 22,447.3); p < 0.0001]. The CER was 112.7 and 346.8 in LBBaP and BVP, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER = △cost/△echocardiographic response rate) was $-365.3/per 1% increase in effectiveness. LBBaP improved cardiac function more significantly than BVP. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes., Conclusions: LBBaP-CRT is more cost-effective than BVP, offering greater LVEF improvement, higher echocardiographic response rates, lower hospitalization costs, and more significantly improved cardiac function. These findings need large randomized clinical trials for further confirmation., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: It is unknown whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) would improve or halt the progression of heart failure (HF) in patients with mild to moderately reduced ejection fraction (HFmmrEF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB)., Objective: This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of CRT in patients with HFmmrEF and left ventricular conduction delay., Methods: A prospective, randomized clinical trial sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute included 76 patients who met the study inclusion criteria (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] of 36%-50% and LBBB). Patients received CRT-pacemaker and were randomized to CRT-OFF (right ventricular pacing 40 beats/min) or CRT-ON (biventricular pacing 60-150 beats/min). At a 6-month follow-up, pacing programming was changed to the opposite settings. New York Heart Association class, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, and echocardiographic variables were collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary study end point was the left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) change from baseline, and the primary randomized comparison was the comparison of 6-month to 12-month changes between randomized groups., Results: The mean age of the patients was 68.4 ± 9.8 years (male, 71%). Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 randomized groups (all P > .05). In patients randomized to CRT-OFF first, then CRT-ON, LVESV was reduced from baseline only after CRT-ON (baseline, 116.1 ± 36.5 mL; CRT-ON, 87.6 ± 26.0 mL; P < .0001). The randomized analysis of LVEF showed a significantly better change from 6 to 12 months in the OFF-ON group (P = .003). LVEF was improved by CRT (baseline, 41.3% ±.7%; CRT-ON, 46.0% ± 8.0%; P = .002). In patients randomized to CRT-ON first, then CRT-OFF, LVESV was reduced after both CRT-ON and CRT-OFF (baseline, 109.8 ± 23.5 mL; CRT-ON, 91.7 ± 30.5 mL [P < .0001]; CRT-OFF, 99.3 ± 28.9 mL [P = .012]). However, the LVESV reduction effect became smaller between CRT-ON and CRT-OFF (P = .027). LVEF improved after both CRT-ON and CRT-OFF (baseline, 42.7% ± 4.3%; CRT-ON, 48.5% ± 8.6% [P < .001]; CRT-OFF, 45.9% ± 7.7% [P = .025])., Conclusion: CRT for patients with HFmmrEF significantly improves LVEF and ventricular remodeling after 6 months of CRT. The study provides novel evidence that early CRT benefits patients with HFmmrEF with LBBB., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite growing clinical use of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), data regarding the fundamentals of this pacing modality, including chronaxie and rheobase, are scarce., Objective: The purpose of this study was to calculate strength-duration curves with chronaxie and rheobase values for LBBP and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP), and to analyze battery current drain and presence of selective LBBP at very short pulse duration (PD)., Methods: A group of 141 patients with permanent LBBP were studied. LBBP and LVSP capture thresholds were assessed at 6 different PDs to calculate the strength-duration curves. Battery current drain at these PDs and presence of selective LBBP were determined. For comparison of strength-duration curves between His-bundle pacing (HBP) and LBBP, source data from our previous work based on 127 patients with HBP were obtained., Results: The chronaxies for LBBP and LVSP were very similar (0.38 vs 0.39 ms), and the rheobases were identical (0.27 V). The chronaxie for LBBP was lower than for HBP (0.38 vs 0.53 ms; P <.001), whereas rheobases were similar (0.27 vs 0.26 V). A narrow zone of selective capture was present in 19% and 41% of patients at PD of 0.06 and 0.03 ms, respectively. When pacing with the safety margin of +1 V, the lowest battery current drain was achieved with PD of 0.2 ms., Conclusion: The obtained strength-duration curves for LBBP and LVSP provide insights to optimal programming of left bundle branch area pacing devices with regard to PD, voltage amplitude, battery longevity, and selective capture., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Kiełbasa reports consultant fees from Medtronic and Biotronik. Dr Jastrzebski reports consultant fees from Medtronic, Abbott, and Biotronik. Dr Moskal reports consultant fees from Medtronic and Biotronik. Dr Vijayaraman reports honoraria, consultant, research, and fellowship support from Medtronic; and being a consultant for Abbott and Eaglepoint. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The impact of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) on right ventricular (RV) function and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remains unclear., Objective: We aimed to assess the long-term effects of LBBAP on RV performance and on TR., Methods: RV function was evaluated using RV free wall strain, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, fractional area changing, and systolic velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus. The presence of reverse septal flash (RSF) and basal bulge (BB) was used to assess RV motion pattern. The distance between the lead entry site on the interventricular septum and the septal leaflet of the tricuspid annulus (lead-TV distance) was measured., Results: The analysis included 122 subjects [62 men (50.8%); mean age 76.5 ± 11.4 years] with a median follow-up of 21 months (18-24.5 months). During follow-up, RV free wall strain improved significantly (15.2 ± 5.8 vs 16.4 ± 5.5; P < .001) while tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, systolic, and fractional area changing remained unchanged. Left ventricular ejection fraction was an independent predictor of improved RV function (B = 3.51; 95% confidence interval 1.39-8.9; P = .01). With LBBAP, RSF disappeared in 22 of 23 patients (96%) and BB in 15 of 22 patients (68%) in whom RSF and BB were present at baseline, respectively. RV function improvement was significantly higher when RSF was present at baseline (14 patients vs 11 patients; P = .02). At follow-up, no significant deterioration in TR occurred for the overall group. However, a lead-TV distance of <24.5 mm was associated with TR progression., Conclusion: LBBAP has a favorable impact on RV function. A basal LBBAP position is associated with worsening TR., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Burri has received institutional research and fellowship support and speaker fees from and serves on the advisory boards of Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and MicroPort. Drs Jastrzębski and Moskal have received speaker and consultancy fees from Medtronic and Biotronik. The rest of the authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a frequent finding in patients with heart failure (HF), particularly in those with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). LBBB has been commonly described as a consequence of DCM development. However, a total recovery of left ventricular (LV) function after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), observed in patients with LBBB and DCM, has led to increasing acknowledgement of LBBB-induced dilated cardiomyopathy (LBBB-iDCM) as a specific pathological entity. Its recognition has important clinical implications, as LBBB-iDCM patients may benefit from an early CRT strategy rather than medical HF therapy only. At present, there are no definitive diagnostic criteria enabling the universal identification of LBBB-iDCM, and no defined therapeutic approach in this subgroup of patients. This review compiles the main findings about LBBB-iDCM pathophysiology and the current proposed diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approach., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has swiftly emerged as a safe and effective alternative to right ventricular pacing. Limited data exist on the use of retractable-helix, stylet-driven leads for LBBAP., Objective: The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the performance and safety of a stylet-driven pacing lead in a rigorously controlled multicenter trial to support US market application., Methods: A multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized trial enrolled patients with standard pacing indications. Implant procedure and lead data, including threshold, sensing, impedance, and capture type, were collected through 3 months. Primary end points were freedom from LBBAP lead-related serious complications through 3 months and LBBAP implant success according to prespecified criteria. A blinded clinical events committee adjudicated all potential end point complications., Results: A total of 186 patients were included from 14 US sites. LBBAP implants were successful in 95.7% (178 of 186; 95% confidence interval 91.7%-98.1%; P < .0001 for comparison to the performance goal of 88%). Through the 3-month follow-up visit, 3 patients (1.7%) experienced a serious LBBAP complication (all lead dislodgments), resulting in a LBBAP lead-related complication-free rate of 98.3%. A total of 13 patients (7.8%) experienced any system- or procedure-related complication. The mean threshold was 0.89 V at 0.4 ms, the sensing value was 10.8 mV, and impedance was 608 Ω., Conclusion: The short-term results from this prospective trial demonstrate both high implant success and freedom from LBBAP lead-related complications using this stylet-driven retractable helix lead. This trial supports the safety, use, and effectiveness of stylet-driven leads for performing contemporary physiologic pacing., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Liu reports serving as a consultant for Biotronik. Dr Prasad reports having received consultation fees and honoraria from Biotronik. Dr Vijayaraman reports serving as a speaker and consultant for and receives research and fellowship support from Medtronic; he is also a consultant for Abbott and received honoraria from Biotronik and Boston Scientific and owns a patent on a His bundle pacing delivery tool. Dr Zanon reports speaker fees (modest) from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and MicroPort. Dr Gleva reports consultancy fees from Abbott, Biotronik, and Medtronic. Dr De Pooter reports speaker honoraria and consultancy fees from Medtronic, Biotronik, Abbott, and Boston Scientific. Dr Chinitz reports a speaker honoraria engagement with Abbott, Biotronik, Medtronic, and Biosense Webster. Dr Moretta reports no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A 75-year-old male with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) underwent left bundle branch (LBB) pacing (LBBP) implantation. Intraoperative recordings showed that the LBB potential-ventricular (LBB-V) interval gradually decreased from 47 to 19 ms (ms). Two-year follow-up indicated stable pacing parameters and consistent electrocardiogram (ECG) results. Despite potential conduction delays caused by lead implantation, a watchful waiting strategy demonstrated recovery potential without impacting long-term prognosis or pacing parameters., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In patients with dyssynchronous heart failure (DHF), cardiac conduction abnormalities cause the regional distribution of myocardial work to be non-homogeneous. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using an implantable, programmed biventricular pacemaker/defibrillator, can improve the synchrony of contraction between the right and left ventricles in DHF, resulting in reduced morbidity and mortality and increased quality of life. Since regional work depends on wall stress, which cannot be measured in patients, we used computational methods to investigate regional work distributions and their changes after CRT. We used three-dimensional multi-scale patient-specific computational models parameterized by anatomic, functional, hemodynamic, and electrophysiological measurements in eight patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB) who received CRT. To increase clinical translatability, we also explored whether streamlined computational methods provide accurate estimates of regional myocardial work. We found that CRT increased global myocardial work efficiency with significant improvements in non-responders. Reverse ventricular remodeling after CRT was greatest in patients with the highest heterogeneity of regional work at baseline, however the efficacy of CRT was not related to the decrease in overall work heterogeneity or to the reduction in late-activated regions of high myocardial work. Rather, decreases in early-activated regions of myocardium performing negative myocardial work following CRT best explained patient variations in reverse remodeling. These findings were also observed when regional myocardial work was estimated using ventricular pressure as a surrogate for myocardial stress and changes in endocardial surface area as a surrogate for strain. These new findings suggest that CRT promotes reverse ventricular remodeling in human dyssynchronous heart failure by increasing regional myocardial work in early-activated regions of the ventricles, where dyssynchrony is specifically associated with hypoperfusion, late systolic stretch, and altered metabolic activity and that measurement of these changes can be performed using streamlined approaches., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Patent applications related to the technology described here have been submitted in the United States (“Compositions and methods for patient-specific modeling to predict outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy,” serial no. P00015-268P01; “Patient-specific modeling of ventricular activation pattern using surface ECG-derived vectorcardiogram in bundle branch block,” serial no. PCT/US15/36788). A.D.M and J.H.O are co-founders and equity-holders in Insilicomed, Inc., a licensee of UC San Diego software used in this research. A.D.M, C.T.V, and D.E.K. are co-founders and equity holders of Vektor Medical Inc., which was not involved in this research. Vektor Medical and Insilicomed, Inc. had no involvement at all in design, performance, analysis or funding of the present study. Vektor Medical and Insilicomed are licensees of intellectual property arising from or used in this research. This relationship has been disclosed to, reviewed, and approved by the University of California San Diego in accordance with its conflict of interest policies., (Copyright: © 2024 Craine et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

The authors report for the first time to their knowledge, implantation of a standard implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead for permanent delivery of left bundle branch area pacing. Implantation was successful and safe in 11 of 12 patients, with adequate defibrillation testing, good electrical and electrocardiographic parameters, and uneventful device-related short-term follow-up., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Imnadze is an advisory board member for Abbott and Medtronic. Dr Sommer is an advisory board member for Abbott and Medtronic. Dr Burri has received institutional research grants, fellowship support, and speaker fees from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and MicroPort. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A larger left bundle branch (LBB) potential or LBB current of injury (COI) indicates a low LBB capture threshold in LBB pacing. During LBB pacing in an 85-year-old woman, achieving a low LBB capture threshold did not initially present with a larger LBB potential or LBB COI, but rather with a new initial negative deflection in a ventricular electrogram. LBB COI gradually developed over 7 min thereafter, which suggested that the lead tip had reached the left ventricular subendocardium. Therefore, this negative deflection may be the first sign to avoid further lead rotation., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction and Objectives: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy associated with left bundle branch block (LBBB). In these patients, the device can normalize left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether CRT responders still require neurohormonal blockers. The aim of this study is to determine the long-term safety of withdrawing drug therapy in these patients., Methods: The REMOVE trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label and randomized 1:1 study designed to assess the effect of withdrawing neurohormonal blockers in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy associated with left bundle branch block who recovered LVEF after CRT. The study will include a 12-month follow-up with the option to continue into the follow-up extension phase for up to 24 months. The primary endpoint is the recurrence of cardiomyopathy defined as any of the following criteria: a) a reduction in LVEF >10% (provided the LVEF is <50%); b) a reduction in LVEF >10% accompanied by an increase >15% in the indexed end-systolic volume relative to the previous value and in a range higher than the normal values, or c) decompensated heart failure requiring intravenous diuretic administration. In patients meeting the primary endpoint, drug therapy will be restarted., Conclusions: The results of this study will help to enhance our understanding of CRT superresponders, a specific group of patients. Registred at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05151861)., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled HOPE-HF trial assessed the benefit of atrio-ventricular (AV) delay optimization delivered using His bundle pacing. It recruited patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, PR interval ≥200 ms, and baseline QRS ≤140 ms or right bundle branch block. Overall, there was no significant increase in peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 max) but there was significant improvement in heart failure specific quality of life. In this pre-specified secondary analysis, we evaluated the impact of baseline PR interval, echocardiographic E-A fusion, and the magnitude of acute high-precision haemodynamic response to pacing, on outcomes., Methods and Results: All 167 randomized participants underwent measurement of PR interval, acute haemodynamic response at optimized AV delay, and assessment of presence of E-A fusion. We tested the impact of these baseline parameters using a Bayesian ordinal model on VO 2 max, quality of life and activity measures. There was strong evidence of a beneficial interaction between the baseline acute haemodynamic response and the blinded benefit of pacing for VO 2 (Pr 99.9%), Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) (Pr 99.8%), MLWHF physical limitation score (Pr 98.9%), EQ-5D visual analogue scale (Pr 99.6%), and exercise time (Pr 99.4%). The baseline PR interval and the presence of baseline E-A fusion did not have this reliable ability to predict the clinical benefit of pacing over placebo across multiple endpoints., Conclusions: In the HOPE-HF trial, the acute haemodynamic response to pacing reliably identified patients who obtained clinical benefit. Patients with a long PR interval (≥200 ms) and left ventricular impairment who obtained acute haemodynamic improvement with AV-optimized His bundle pacing were likely to obtain clinical benefit, consistent across multiple endpoints. Importantly, this gradation can be reliably tested for before randomization, but does require high-precision AV-optimized haemodynamic assessment to be performed., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and its severity are associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure patients. This study aims to analyze the predictors of FMR improvement after successful left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients with LVEF < 50% and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB)., Methods: Consecutive patients with LVEF < 50% and CLBBB who underwent successful LBBAP from July 2018 to July 2023 were retrospectively identified. Significant MR was defined as regurgitation of moderate severity or greater. Patients with significant FMR were included in the analysis. FMR improvement (FMRI) was defined as a reduction of at least one grade in regurgitation severity compared to baseline at 3 months or longer follow-up., Results: Among the 81 identified patients, 42 patients with significant FMR preoperatively were included. After LBBAP, QRS duration significantly shortened from 170.6 ± 18.8 ms to 114.5 ± 20.2 ms (p < .001). Significant FMR improves in approximately 76.2%, and the patients were divided into an FMRI group (n = 32) and a non-FMRI group (n = 10). Univariate analysis showed that absence of persistent atrial fibrillation, typical CLBBB, and left atrium diameter at baseline were associated with improvement of FMR after LBBAP. Of these variables, only absence of persistent atrial fibrillation remains an independent predictor in the multivariate model (OR 12.436, p = .009)., Conclusion: LBBAP is able to improve FMR in heart failure patients who had CLBBB with LVEF < 50%. Meanwhile, the absence of persistent atrial fibrillation is an independent predictor of FMR improvement., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been established as an effective means to correct left bundle branch block. Right bundle branch block (RBBB), emerge as a distinct form of cardiac conduction abnormality, can be seen in the context of LBBAP procedure. However, the correction potential of LBBAP in patients with RBBB remains largely unexplored., Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of permanent LBBAP in patients with RBBB., Methods: Ninety-two consecutive patients who underwent successful permanent LBBAP were recruited from May. 2019 to Dec. 2022 in Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital. Among them, 20 patients with RBBB were included in our analysis. These patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-LBBAP. The QRS duration (QRSd) on the V1 lead of the 12-lead elctrocardiogram was measured and compared before and after the LBBAP procedure. Additionally, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation and cardiac function were assessed using transthoracic echocardiography, specifically focusing on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and mitral regurgitation severity. The acute pitfills and delayed complications associated with the LBBAP procedure were recorded to evaluate its safety. SPSS 23.0 was used to perform statistical analysis with Student's t test or one way ANOVA or nonparametric tests (paired Wilcoxon test). A p value less than 0.05 was defined as significant., Results: The demographic breakdown of the RBBB cohort revealed a mean age of 66.35 ± 11.55 years, 60% being male. Comorbidities were prevalent, including severe atrioventricular block (AVB) in 75%, sick sinus syndrome (SSS) in 20%, heart failure in 25%, atrial fibrillation in 30%, coronary heart diseases in 45%, hypertension in 35%, and diabetes mellitus in 15%. Regarding the LBBAP procedure, the average operation time was 106.53 ± 2.72 min, with 45% of patients (9 individuals) requiring temporary cardiac pacing during the surgery. Notably, the LBBAP procedure significantly narrow the QRS duration in RBBB patients, from 132.60 ± 31.49ms to 119.55 ± 18.58 ms (P = 0.046). Additionally, at the 12-month follow-up, we observed a marked improvement in LVEF, which increased significantly from 55.15 ± 10.84% to 58.5 ± 10.55% (P = 0.018). Furthermore, mitral regurgitation severity improved, with a median reduction from 4.46 (0.9, 7.3) to 2.29 (0, 3.49) cm 2 (P = 0.033). Importantly, no cases of ventricular septum perforation or pericardial effusion were reported during the LBBAP procedure or during the follow-up period., Conclusion: LBBAP provides an immediate reduction in QRS duration for patients suffering from RBBB, accompanied by improvements in mitral regurgitation and cardiac function as evident in the 12-month follow-up period., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

A 67-year-old male presented with symptomatic bradycardia caused by atrial fibrillation and underwent His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). Electrocardiography (ECG) revealed a complete right bundle branch block (RBBB). John Jiang's connecting cable was used during the transventricular septal process. An interesting dynamic retrograde His bundle potential (RHP) was recorded with uninterrupted lead screws., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a physiological alternative pacing strategy to biventricular pacing (BIVP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to assess the impact of LBBAP vs. BIVP on all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization in patients undergoing CRT., Methods: Studies comparing LBBAP and BIVP for CRT in patients with HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were included. The coprimary outcomes were all-cause mortality and HF-related hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included procedural and fluoroscopy time, change in QRS duration, and change in LVEF., Results: Thirteen studies (12 observational and 1 RCT, n = 3239; LBBAP = 1338 and BIVP = 1901) with a mean follow-up duration of 25.8 months were included. Compared to BIVP, LBBAP was associated with a significant absolute risk reduction of 3.2% in all-cause mortality (9.3% vs 12.5%, RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.57-0.86, p < 0.001) and an 8.2% reduction in HF-related hospitalization (11.3% vs 19.5%, RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.71, p < 0.00001). LBBAP also resulted in reductions in procedural time (mean weighted difference- 23.2 min, 95% CI - 42.9 to - 3.6, p = 0.02) and fluoroscopy time (- 8.6 min, 95% CI - 12.5 to - 4.7, p < 0.001) as well as a significant reduction in QRS duration (mean weighted difference:- 25.3 ms, 95% CI - 30.9 to - 19.8, p < 0.00001) and a greater improvement in LVEF of 5.1% (95% CI 4.4-5.8, p < 0.001) compared to BIVP in the studies that reported these outcomes., Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, LBBAP was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality as well as HF-related hospitalization when compared to BIVP. Additional data from large RCTs is warranted to corroborate these promising findings., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Drs Lustgarten, Habel, and Meyer have received research funding from Medtronic, Inc. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Introduction: Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) is a rate-responsive algorithm that adjusts heart rate (HR) based on changes in intracardiac impedance measured from the right ventricle lead. However, the use of CLS in conduction system pacing has not been investigated. In this retrospective study, we aimed to assess whether CLS with left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) can generate an appropriate distribution of HR in daily life., Methods and Results: Our study included 24 patients with CLS pacing and chronotropic incompetence, comparing them with 19 patients receiving DDD pacing, all with LBBAP. Cumulative HR distribution charts were generated using data from a single device interrogation with a minimum follow-up period of 30 days. In DDD-CLS mode, there was a higher percentage of atrial pacing compared to DDD mode (median 58% [interquartile range 29%-83%] vs. 13% [10%-26%], p = .001), and CLS-paced beats were present across all frequency bins. The distribution of beats between the groups was similar (p = .643), resulting in comparable mean HR (72 bpm [70-77] vs. 73 bpm [65-75], p = .615)., Conclusions: In the context of LBBAP, CLS effectively modulates pacing rates over a wide frequency range. This lead position does not adversely affect the rate-responsive performance of the algorithm., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Recently, conduction system pacing has been performed in patients with impaired cardiac function. We report a case in which a DF4 implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead was screwed directly into the left bundle branch area with the support of a steerable delivery sheath., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

In this study, we present a computational framework designed to evaluate virtual scenarios of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and compare their effectiveness based on relevant clinical biomarkers. Our approach involves electro-mechanical numerical simulations personalized, for patients with left bundle branch block, by means of a calibration obtained using data from Electro-Anatomical Mapping System (EAMS) measures acquired by cardiologists during the CRT procedure, as well as ventricular pressures and volumes, both obtained pre-implantation. We validate the calibration by using EAMS data coming from right pacing conditions. Three patients with fibrosis and three without are considered to explore various conditions. Our virtual scenarios consist of personalized numerical experiments, incorporating different positions of the left electrode along reconstructed epicardial veins; different locations of the right electrode; different ventriculo-ventricular delays. The aim is to offer a comprehensive tool capable of optimizing CRT efficiency for individual patients. We provide preliminary answers on optimal electrode placement and delay, by computing some relevant biomarkers such as d P / d t max , ejection fraction, stroke work. From our numerical experiments, we found that the latest activated segment during sinus rhythm is an effective choice for the non-fibrotic cases for the location of the left electrode. Also, our results showed that the activation of the right electrode before the left one seems to improve the CRT performance for the non-fibrotic cases. Last, we found that the CRT performance seems to improve by positioning the right electrode halfway between the base and the apex. This work is on the line of computational works for the study of CRT and introduces new features in the field, such as the presence of the epicardial veins and the movement of the right electrode. All these studies from the different research groups can in future synergistically flow together in the development of a tool which clinicians could use during the procedure to have quantitative information about the patient's propagation in different scenarios., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare to have no conflict of interest. Ethical approval and consent to participate Ethical review board approval and informed consent were obtained from all patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared.

Background: Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBaP) is a cardiac pacing technique designed to mimic the natural conduction system of the heart. Traditional right ventricular apical pacing has been associated with increased risks of heart failure and atrial fibrillation. This study investigates the stability and safety of LBBaP using the Selectra 3D sheath (Biotronik) with an inclined angle for implanting the Solia S lead (Biotronik, SE & Co, KG)., Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on 25 patients who underwent LBBaP implantation using the Selectra 3D sheath at our hospital. The procedure involved inserting the Solia S lead into the interventricular septum at an inclined angle. Surgical and postoperative data were collected, including the success rate, depth and angle of electrode insertion, complications, and follow-up data., Results: The success rate of LBBaP implantation was 92%. The length of electrode insertion into the interventricular septum ranged from 12 to 23.0 mm, with an average of 18.1 ± 3.08 mm. The angle formed between the electrode and the septum ranged from 0° to 57.3°, with an average of 35.14°±14.31°. During the 3-month follow-up period, pacing parameters remained stable, and no complications were reported., Conclusions: LBBaP implantation using the Selectra 3D sheath with an inclined angle for the Solia S implantation demonstrates stability and safety. The procedure boasts a high success rate and offers an effective option for LBBaP implantation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Biventricular pacing is a well-established therapy for patients with heart failure (HF), left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative to biventricular pacing., Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the retrograde conduction properties of the left bundle branch in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB during LBBP and its clinical implications., Methods: Patients undergoing successful LBBP for nonischemic cardiomyopathy with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% and LBBB were included. Continuous recording of His potential was performed using a quadripolar catheter. Unidirectional block was defined as retrograde His bundle activation during LBBP with stimulus to His potential (SH) duration less than or equal to antegrade HV interval and bidirectional block as VH dissociation or SH duration greater than HV interval. HF hospitalization, ventricular arrhythmias, and mortality were documented., Results: A total of 165 patients were included. The mean follow-up duration was 21.8 ± 13.1 months. Bidirectional block (group I) was observed in 82% (n = 136), and these patients were noted to have advanced HF stage and prolonged baseline QRS duration. Unidirectional block (group II) with intact retrograde conduction was observed in 18% (n = 29) and was associated with narrow paced QRS duration and higher LVEF during follow-up. Super-response (LVEF ≥50%) was observed in 54.4% (n = 74) in group I compared with 73.3% (n = 22) in group II (P = 0.03). The OR for LVEF normalization was 4.1 (95% CI: 1.26-13.97; P = 0.02), with unidirectional block compared with bidirectional block in patients with LBBB and LV dysfunction. Adverse clinical outcomes as measured by a composite of HF hospitalization, ventricular arrhythmias, and mortality were significantly higher in group I compared with group II (12.5% vs 0%; P = 0.04)., Conclusions: Bidirectional block in LBBB was characterized by advanced HF symptoms, while unidirectional block was associated with better clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy by LBBP., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Ponnusamy is a consultant for Medtronic. Dr Vijayaraman is a speaker and consultant for and has received research and fellowship support from Medtronic; is a consultant for Abbott, Biotronik, and Boston Scientific; and holds a patent on an HBP delivery tool. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation may be complicated by the development of conduction disturbances, including left bundle branch block and high-grade atrioventricular blocks, especially in patients with predisposing risk factors, such as pre-existing right bundle branch block. Permanent pacemaker implantation is a procedure with potential short- and long-term complications, and it should be reserved to patients with appropriate indications. Electrophysiological testing and/or prolonged ambulatory ECG monitoring are valuable tools for stratifying the risk of pacemaker implantation. However, the management of new-onset conduction disorders is not always straightforward, and there are different approaches depending on the center's attitude. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to define clinical management based on current evidence, while awaiting data from randomized trials.

The recent results of the REVIVED-BCIS2 randomized clinical trial added further controversy on the utility of myocardial revascularization in patients with chronic coronary syndrome with reduced ejection fraction. However, coronary artery disease still represents the leading cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, with the potential for functional recovery following complete revascularization due to the restoration of the so-called hibernating myocardium. We report an emblematic case of a patient with recovery of contractile function and normalization of the left bundle branch block after percutaneous coronary intervention of the right coronary artery chronic total occlusion.

Introduction: The association between paced LVAT and cardiac structure and function at baseline, as well as whether longer LVAT is associated with worse cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) has not been well investigated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between paced LVAT and baseline echocardiographic parameters and cardiac reverse remodeling at follow-up., Methods: Patients with HF and LBBB receiving successful left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) from June 2018 to April 2023 were enrolled and grouped based on paced LVAT. NT-proBNP and echocardiographic parameters were recorded during routine follow-up. The relationships between paced LVAT and echocardiographic parameters at baseline and follow-up were analyzed., Results: Eighty-three patients were enrolled (48 males, aged 65 ± 9.8, mean LVEF 32.1 ± 7.5%, mean LVEDD 63.0 ± 8.5 mm, median NT-proBNP 1057[513-3158] pg/mL). The paced QRSd was significantly decreased (177 ± 17.9 vs. 134 ± 18.5, p < .001) and median paced LVAT was 80[72-88] ms. After a median follow-up of 12[9-29] months, LVEF increased to 52.1 ± 11.2%, LVEDD decreased to 52.6 ± 8.8 mm, and NT-proBNP decreased to 215[73-532]pg/mL. Patients were grouped based on paced LVAT: LVAT < 80 ms (n = 39); 80 ≤ LVAT < 90 ms (n = 24); LVAT ≥ 90 ms (n = 20). Patients with longer LVAT had larger LVEDD and lower LVEF (LVEDD baseline : p < .001; LVEF baseline : p = .001). The difference in LVEF 6M was statistically significant among groups (p < .001) and patients with longer LVAT had lower LVEF 6M , while the difference in LVEF 1Y was not seen (p = .090). There was no significant correlation between ΔLVEF 6M-baseline, ΔLVEF 1Y-6M and LVAT respectively (ΔLVEF 6M-baseline : p = .261, r = -.126; ΔLVEF 1Y-6M : p = .085, r = .218)., Conclusion: Long paced LVAT was associated with worse echocardiographic parameters at baseline, but did not affect the cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with HF and LBBB. Those with longer LVAT required longer time to recover., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

New-generation transcatheter heart valves have significantly improved technical success and procedural safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures; however, the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) remains a concern. This study aimed to assess the role of anatomic annulus features in determining periprocedural conduction disturbances leading to new PPI after TAVI using the last-generation Edwards SAPIEN balloon-expandable valves. In the context of a prospective single-center registry, we integrated the clinical and procedural predictors of PPI with anatomic data derived from multislice computed tomography. A total of 210 consecutive patients treated with balloon-expandable Edwards transcatheter heart valve were included in the study from 2015 to 2023. Technical success was achieved in 197 procedures (93.8%), and 26 patients (12.4%) required new PPI at the 30-day follow-up (median time to implantation 3 days). At the univariable logistic regression analysis, preprocedural right bundle branch block (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 4.97, p = 0.047), annulus eccentricity ≥0.25 (OR 5.43, 95% CI 2.21 to 13.36, p <0.001), calcium volume at annulus of the right coronary cusp >48 mm 3 (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.13 to 5.96, p = 0.024), and prosthesis implantation depth greater than membranous septum length (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.28, p = 0.026) were associated with new PPI risk. In the multivariable analysis, preprocedural right bundle branch block (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.01 to 7.85, p = 0.049), annulus eccentricity ≥0.25 (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.85 to 9.27, p <0.001), and annulus right coronary cusp calcium >48 mm 3 (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.07 to 7.82, p = 0.037) were confirmed as independent predictors of new PPI. In conclusion, specific anatomic features of the aortic valve annulus might have an additive role in determining the occurrence of conduction disturbances in patients who underwent TAVI with balloon-expandable valves. This suggests the possibility to use multislice computed tomography to improve the prediction of post-TAVI new PPI risk., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Romagnoli received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Terumo. F. Burzotta and C. Trani received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Medtronic, and Terumo. Dr. Aurigemma received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Medtronic, Terumo, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Bianchini received a research grant from Abbott. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Left bundle branch area pacing is an alternative to biventricular pacing. In this study, we aim to summarize the available evidence on the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of left bundle branch block area pacing (LBBAP)., Objectives: The study summarizes the available evidence on the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of left bundle branch block area pacing (LBBAP)., Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduced mortality and hospitalizations in heart failure (HF) patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and concomitant LBBB. Recently LBBAP has been studied as a more physiological alternative to achieve CRT., Method: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were performed to identify studies examining the role of LBBAP for CRT in heart failure. Comprehensive meta-analysis version 4 was used for meta-regression to examine variables that contribute to data heterogeneity., Result: Eighteen studies, 17 observational and one randomized controlled trial (RCT) were examined. A total of 3906 HF patients who underwent CRT (2036 LBBAP vs. 1870 biventricular pacing [BVP]) were included. LBBAP was performed successfully in 90.4% of patients. Compared to baseline, LBBAP was associated with a reduction in QRS duration (MD: -47.23  ms 95% confidence interval [CI]: -53.45, -41.01), an increase in LVEF (MD: 15.22%, 95% CI: 13.5, 16.94), and a reduction in NYHA class (MD: -1.23, 95% CI: -1.41, -1.05). Compared to BVP, LBBAP was associated with a significant reduction in QRS duration (MD: -20.69 ms, 95% CI: -25.49, -15.88) and improvement in LVEF (MD: 4.78%, 95% CI: 3.30, 6.10). Furthermore, LBBAP was associated with a significant reduction in HF hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.56) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.86) compared to BVP., Conclusion: LBBAP was associated with improved ventricular electrical synchrony compared to BVP, as well as better echocardiographic and clinical outcomes., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) are referred to as left bundle branch area pacing., Objective: This study investigated whether long-term clinical outcomes differ in patients undergoing LBBP, LVSP, and biventricular pacing (BiVP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)., Methods: Consecutive patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) undergoing CRT were prospectively enrolled if they underwent successful LBBP, LVSP, or BiVP. The primary composite end point was all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Secondary end points included all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and echocardiographic measures of reverse remodeling., Results: A total of 259 patients (68 LBBP, 38 LVSP, and 153 BiVP) were observed for a mean duration of 28.8 ± 15.8 months. LBBP was associated with a significantly reduced risk of the primary end point by 78% compared with both BiVP (7.4% vs 41.2%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.22 [0.08-0.57]; P = .002) and LVSP (7.4% vs 47.4%; aHR, 0.22 [0.08-0.63]; P = .004]. The adjusted risk of all-cause mortality was significantly higher in LVSP than in BiVP (31.6% vs 7.2%; aHR, 3.19 [1.38-7.39]; P = .007) but comparable between LBBP and BiVP (2.9% vs 7.2%; aHR, 0.33 [0.07-1.52], P = .155). Propensity score adjustment also obtained similar results. LBBP showed a higher rate of echocardiographic response (ΔLVEF ≥10%: 60.0% vs 36.2% vs 16.1%; P < .001) than BiVP or LVSP., Conclusion: LBBP yielded long-term clinical outcomes superior to those of BiVP and LVSP. The role of LVSP for CRT needs to be reevaluated because of its high mortality risk., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for drug-refractory heart failure (HF) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Acute haemodynamic improvement after CRT implantation may enable the intensification of HF medication soon thereafter. Immediate pharmacotherapy intensification (IPI) after CRT implantation achieves a synergetic effect, possibly leading to a better prognosis. This study aimed to explore the incidence, characteristics, and impact of IPI on real-world outcomes among CRT recipients with a history of hospitalization for acute HF., Methods and Results: This multicentre retrospective study enrolled CRT recipients with LBBB morphology, a QRS width ≥120 ms, a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and New York Heart Association II-IV HF symptoms. All patients had previous HF hospitalizations within the previous year and received guideline-directed medical therapy before CRT implantation. Patient baseline characteristics, including HF medication, were collected. IPI was defined as the intensification of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists within 30 days of CRT implantation. The primary endpoint was all-cause death or first hospitalization for HF; the secondary endpoint was all-cause death. We enrolled 194 patients (75% male; mean age, 65 ± 13 years; 78% with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy). One hundred five (54%) patients received IPI. Patients who received IPI exhibited a significantly shorter QRS duration (159 ± 26 vs. 171 ± 32 ms; P = 0.004), higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (55.2 ± 20.0 vs. 47.8 ± 24.7 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; P = 0.022), and more dilated cardiomyopathy. During a median follow-up period of 29 months, 70 (36%) patients reached the primary endpoint and 42 (22%) patients died. Patients with IPI showed significantly better outcomes for the primary and secondary endpoints than patients without IPI. The volumetric responder ratio at 6 months after implantation was not significantly different between patients with and without IPI; however, patients who received IPI had reduced mortality even at 6 months after implantation. In the multivariate analysis, IPI was an independent predictor of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.97; P = 0.043)., Conclusions: Immediate intensification of HF medication was achieved in 54% of CRT recipients and was significantly higher in patients without excessive QRS prolongation, preserved renal function, and dilated cardiomyopathy than others. In patients with LBBB morphology and QRS ≥ 120 ms, IPI was associated with a significantly better prognosis and fewer HF hospitalizations after CRT implantation than others., (© 2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

In patients with a reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function (ejection fraction < 35%) and a left bundle branch block with a QRS duration > 130 ms, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can contribute to an improvement in the quality of life and a reduction in mortality. The resynchronization is mostly achieved by pacing via an epicardial LV lead in the coronary sinus; however, this approach is often limited by the patient's venous anatomy and an increase in the stimulation threshold over time. In addition, up to 30% of patients do not respond to the intervention. New treatment approaches involve direct stimulation of the conduction system by pacing of the bundle of His or left bundle branch. This enables a more physiological propagation of the stimulus. Pacing of the left bundle branch is achieved by advancing the lead into the right ventricle and screwing it deep into the interventricular septum. Due to the relatively large target area of the left bundle branch the success rate is very high (currently > 90%). Observational studies have shown a greater reduction in the QRS duration, a more pronounced improvement in systolic function and a lower hospitalization rate for heart failure associated with conduction system pacing compared to CRT using a coronary sinus lead. These findings have been confirmed in small randomized trials. Therefore, the use of left bundle branch pacing should be considered not only as a bail out in the case of failed resynchronization using coronary sinus lead placement but increasingly also as an initial pacing strategy. The results of the first large randomized trials are expected to be released in late 2024., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: Disclosures The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Background: Women respond more favorably to biventricular pacing (BIVP) than men. Sex differences in atrioventricular and interventricular conduction have been described in BIVP studies. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) offers advantages due to direct capture of the conduction system. We hypothesized that men could respond better to LBBAP than BIVP., Objectives: This study aims to describe the sex differences in response to LBBAP vs BIVP as the initial cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)., Methods: In this multicenter prospective registry, we included patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and left bundle branch block or a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% with an expected right ventricular pacing exceeding 40% undergoing initial CRT with LBBAP or BIVP. The composite primary outcome was heart failure-related hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcome included all procedure-related complications., Results: There was no significant difference in the primary outcome when comparing men and women receiving LBBAP (P = 0.46), whereas the primary outcome was less frequent in women in the BIVP group than men treated with BIVP (P = 0.03). The primary outcome occurred less frequently in men undergoing LBBAP (29.9%) compared to those treated with BIVP (46.5%) (P = 0.004). In women, the incidence of the primary endpoint was 24.14% in the LBBAP group and 36.2% in the BIVP group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.23). Complication rates remained consistent across all groups., Conclusions: Men and women undergoing LBBAP for CRT had similar clinical outcomes. Men undergoing LBBAP showed a lower risk of heart failure-related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality compared to men undergoing BIVP, whereas there was no difference between LBBAP and BIVP in women., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Diaz has received speaker honoraria and has been a proctor for Medtronic for conduction system pacing. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, despite the presence of left bundle branch block, whether cardiac substrate may influence the effect between the 2 strategies is unclear., Objectives: This study aims to assess the association of septal scar on reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes of LBBAP compared with BVP., Methods: We analyzed patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who had CRT indications undergoing preprocedure cardiac magnetic resonance examination. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and echocardiographic response (ER) (≥5% absolute LVEF increase) were assessed at 6 months. The clinical outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or major ventricular arrhythmia., Results: There were 147 patients included (51 LBBAP and 96 BVP). Among patients with low septal scar burden (below median 5.7%, range: 0% to 5.3%), LVEF improvement was higher in the LBBAP than the BVP group (17.5% ± 10.9% vs 12.3% ± 11.8%; P = 0.037), with more than 3-fold increased odds of ER (OR: 4.35; P = 0.033). In high sepal scar subgroups (≥5.7%, range: 5.7%-65.9%), BVP trended towards higher LVEF improvement (9.2% ± 9.4% vs 6.4% ± 12.4%; P = 0.085). Interaction between septal scar burden and pacing strategy was significant for ER (P = 0.002) and LVEF improvement (P = 0.011) after propensity score adjustment. During median follow-up of 33.7 (Q1-Q3: 19.8-42.1) months, the composite clinical outcome occurred in 34.7% (n = 51) of patients. The high-burden subgroups had worse clinical outcomes independent of CRT method., Conclusions: Remodeling response to LBBAP and BVP among nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients is modified by septal scar burden. High septal scar burden was associated with poor clinical prognosis independent of CRT methods., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 81870260), High-level Hospital construction project of Fuwai Hospital (Grant Number 2022-GSP-GG-31), and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (Grant Number 2022-I2M-C&T-B-049). Dr Gold has received consulting fees from Boston Scientific, EBR, and Medtronic; and has received clinical trial support from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: In patients undergoing pacemaker implantation with no prior history of heart failure (HF), the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been identified as an independent predictor of HF-related death or hospitalization, while the prognostic significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the long-term risk of all-cause mortality in patients with a standard indication for permanent pacing and normal or moderately depressed left ventricular function when RBBB is detected at the time of implantation., Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 1348 consecutive patients who had undergone single- or dual-chamber pacemaker implantation at the study center, from January 1990 to December 2022. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% or a prior diagnosis of HF were excluded., Results: The baseline 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed an RBBB in 241 (18%) and an LBBB in 98 (7%) patients. During a median follow-up of 65 [25th-75th percentile: 32-117] months, 704 (52%) patients died. The combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization was reached by 173 (13%) patients. On multivariate analysis, RBBB was confirmed as an independent predictor of death [hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.63; P  = 0.005]. However, when considering the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization, this endpoint was independently associated with LBBB (hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.38-3.29; P  < 0.001), but not with RBBB., Conclusion: In patients with standard pacemaker indications and normal or moderately depressed left ventricular function, the presence of basal RBBB was an independent predictor of mortality. However, it was not associated with the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization., (Copyright © 2024 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with heart failure and a non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) QRS pattern have a limited response to biventricular pacing (BVP)., Objective: A personalized cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation approach guided by real-time electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) was studied., Methods: Twenty patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, QRS duration ≥ 120 ms, and non-LBBB [13 (65%) with right bundle branch block and 7 (35%) with intraventricular conduction delay] were recruited. During CRT implantation, right atrial, right ventricular, coronary sinus, His-bundle, and/or left bundle leads were inserted. The total activation time (TAT) with different pacing combinations were measured in real time during implantation by ECGi. The configuration producing the shortest TAT was chosen. Clinical response was defined as ≥1 New York Heart Association class improvement. Echocardiographic response was defined as left ventricular end-systolic volume reduction ≥ 15% and/or LVEF improvement ≥ 10% at 6 months., Results: After ECGi-guided CRT implantation, LVEF improved from 26% ± 6% to 34% ± 11% (P < .01) and New York Heart Association class improved from 3.0 ± 0.5 to 2.0 ± 0.6 (P < .01). Both clinical and echocardiographic response rates were 70%. The ECGi approach resulted in better acute electrical resynchronization over BVP as measured by TAT reduction (40% vs 14%; P < .01). The percentage of TAT reduction was found to be a strong predictor for echocardiographic response (area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.00). A strong positive correlation between percentage TAT reduction and percentage LVEF improvement (Pearson R = 0.70; P = .001) was found., Conclusion: ECGi-guided CRT implantation in patients with non-LBBB generates superior acute electrical resynchronization compared with BVP and is associated with favorable clinical and echocardiographic outcomes., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

3DQRSarea is a strong marker for cardiac resynchronization therapy and can be obtained by taking the (i) summation or the (ii) difference of the areas subtended by positive and negative deflections in X, Y, Z vectorcardiographic electrocardiogram (ECG) leads. We correlated both methods with the instantaneous-absolute-3D-voltage-time-integral (VTI QRS-3D ). 3DQRSarea consistently underestimated the VTI QRS -3D , but the summation method was a closer and more reliable approximation. The dissimilarity was less apparent in left bundle branch block (r 2 summation .996 vs. difference .972) and biventricular paced ECGs (r 2  .996 vs. .957) but was more apparent in normal ECGs (r 2  .988 vs. .653)., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and complete left bundle branch block benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, a large heterogeneity of response to CRT is described. Several predictors of response to CRT have been identified, but the role of the underlying genetic background is still poorly explored., Objectives: In the present study, the authors sought to define differences in LV remodeling and outcome prediction after CRT when stratifying patients according to the presence or absence of DCM-causing genetic background., Methods: From our center, 74 patients with DCM subjected to CRT and available genetic testing were retrospectively enrolled. Carriers of causative monogenic variants in validated DCM-causing genes, and/or with documented family history of DCM, were classified as affected by genetically determined disease (GEN+DCM) (n = 25). Alternatively, by idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (idDCM) (n = 49). The primary outcome was long-term LV remodeling and prevalence of super response to CRT (evaluated at 24-48 months after CRT); the secondary outcome was heart failure-related death/heart transplant/LV assist device., Results: GEN+DCM and idDCM patients were homogeneous at baseline with the exception of QRS duration, longer in idDCM. The median follow-up was 55 months. Long-term LV reverse remodeling and the prevalence of super response were significantly higher in the idDCM group (27% in idDCM vs 5% in GEN+DCM; P = 0.025). The heart failure-related death/heart transplant/LV assist device outcome occurred more frequently in patients with GEN+DCM (53% vs 24% in idDCM; P = 0.028)., Conclusions: Genotyping contributes to the risk stratification of patients with DCM undergoing CRT implantation in terms of LV remodeling and outcomes., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by CRTrieste Foundation and Cassa di Risparmio di Gorizia Foundation to Dr Sinagra. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)