Search

UK recreational boating infrastructure in UK ports and harbors consistently coincides with Marine Protected Area designation. Under UK Marine Protected Area designations, vulnerable seabed habitats such as seagrass beds require protection and/or restoration. Mooring and anchoring activity has coincided with increasing concerns over the conservation status of the climate-buffering properties of seagrass beds in the literature and from empirical studies. Up until this study, there has yet to be a significant UK based trial of a number of modified moorings to see their impact on the reduction in pressure on vulnerable benthic habitats. In May 2019, we installed and tested five Advanced Mooring Systems (AMS) in Cawsand Bay, Plymouth Sound, UK. A further 10 such devices were installed in 2021 after the COVID 19 pandemic. The original five devices tested were 'Stirling' systems, whereby the rode is raised above the seabed by use of several submerged floats set at 1.5–2 m intervals along the chain, leading to a top mark that secures the vessel. Each AMS were attached to the seabed using helical screwpiles by commercial divers using a waterproof hydraulic wrench. The devices have held securely since May 2019, and monitoring of seagrass around these five moorings has occurred regularly (at approximately 6 monthly intervals) between May 2019 and May 2023. No seeding or transplantation to prime seagrass recovery has taken place around the base of the moorings during this period. Nevertheless, during the sixth dive survey in May 2023, 4 years after installation, a 212% increase in seagrass density was recorded within the zone previously abraded by the moorings and riser chains. Blade length of the longest seagrass shoots has also increased over the test period. Semi-structured interviews were held with participants in the trial from boat users, NGOs and government agencies to ascertain attitudes and responses to seagrass conservation and the use of AMS. Interaction with stakeholders are important to securing positive community buy-in to such interventions. We recommend that for small sailing craft and powerboats these systems provide a fit-for-purpose engineering and ecological solution to support the restoration of seagrass beds, but that such initiatives must be accompanied by significant understanding and interaction with local stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examined the prevalence of the use of different types of conventional, complementary and alternative therapies by children diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Of 112 families surveyed, 74% were using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for their child with ASD. CAM use was most strongly associated with parent report of child's diagnosis. Most CAM was reported by families to be either helpful or without effect, but not harmful. The main reasons for choosing CAM were related to concerns with the safety and side effects of prescribed medications. Conventional health care providers should be aware of the high prevalence of use among children with ASD and be prepared to discuss the use of CAM with families.