Search

Abstract Background Rifampicin reduces the plasma concentrations of nevirapine in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) co-infected patients, who are administered these drugs concomitantly. We conducted a prospective interventional study to assess the efficacy of nevirapine-containing highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) when co-administered with rifampicin-containing antituberculosis treatment (ATT) and also measured plasma nevirapine concentrations in patients receiving such a nevirapine-containing HAART regimen. Methods 63 cases included antiretroviral treatment naïve HIV-TB co-infected patients with CD4 counts less than 200 cells/mm3 started on rifampicin-containing ATT followed by nevirapine-containing HAART. In control group we included 51 HIV patients without tuberculosis and on nevirapine-containing HAART. They were assessed for clinical and immunological response at the end of 24 and 48 weeks. Plasma nevirapine concentrations were measured at days 14, 28, 42 and 180 of starting HAART. Results 97 out of 114 (85.1%) patients were alive at the end of 48 weeks. The CD4 cell count showed a mean increase of 108 vs.113 cells/mm3 (p=0.83) at 24 weeks of HAART in cases and controls respectively. Overall, 58.73% patients in cases had viral loads of less than 400 copies/ml at the end of 48 weeks. The mean (± SD) Nevirapine concentrations of cases and control at 14, 28, 42 and 180 days were 2.19 ± 1.49 vs. 3.27 ± 4.95 (p = 0.10), 2.78 ± 1.60 vs. 3.67 ± 3.59 (p = 0.08), 3.06 ± 3.32 vs. 4.04 ± 2.55 (p = 0.10) respectively and 3.04 μg/ml (in cases). Conclusions Good immunological and clinical response can be obtained in HIV-TB co-infected patients receiving rifampicin and nevirapine concomitantly despite somewhat lower nevirapine trough concentrations. This suggests that rifampicin-containing ATT may be co administered in resource limited setting with nevirapine-containing HAART regimen without substantial reduction in antiretroviral effectiveness. Larger sample sized studies and longer follow-up are required to identify populations of individuals where the reduction in nevirapine concentration may result in lower ART response or shorter response duration.

What Is This Summary About?: This summary describes the final analysis of the GRIFFIN study. In this study, participants were newly diagnosed with a type of blood and bone marrow cancer called multiple myeloma, had never received any treatment, and were able to undergo an autologous stem cell transplant. The GRIFFIN study looked at adding the drug daratumumab (D) to a combination of standard treatments called RVd (lenalidomide [R], bortezomib [V], and dexamethasone [d]) during the treatment phases induction and consolidation, followed by daratumumab and lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance. Participants also received an autologous stem cell transplant to further help reduce multiple myeloma. The GRIFFIN study looked at whether D-RVd followed by D-R maintenance was better at killing multiple myeloma cells compared with RVd on its own followed by R maintenance on its own, and if treatments were safe. This summary also describes results from 2 other GRIFFIN publications: one that looked at participants with certain multiple myeloma characteristics or demographic factors that are associated with worse outcomes, and another that looked at how treatments impacted the participants' quality of life., What Were the Results?: At the time of the final analysis of GRIFFIN, participants who were treated with D-RVd followed by D-R maintenance had very low (undetectable) levels of multiple myeloma cells and multiple myeloma markers (biological signs) and were more likely to be alive without the multiple myeloma getting worse or coming back compared with participants who received standard RVd treatment followed by R maintenance. There was also a pattern of similar benefits achieved by participants who were at risk for worse outcomes. Additionally, participants who received D-RVd treatment followed by D-R maintenance reported less pain, less fatigue (extreme tiredness), and greater improvements in their ability to conduct daily physical activities. While some side effects (unwanted or unexpected effects of treatment) were higher with D-RVd, side effects in both groups were as expected, and adding daratumumab did not reduce a participant's ability to handle treatment., What Do the Results of the Study Mean?: Results of the GRIFFIN study showed that D-RVd treatment followed by D-R maintenance was better at treating multiple myeloma than the standard treatment of RVd followed by R maintenance in adults with a new diagnosis of multiple myeloma who were able to receive an autologous stem cell transplant, with no unexpected side effects of treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02874742 (GRIFFIN) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Purpose: We present a phase I/II first-in-human trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of 50 mg and 200 mg doses of linvoseltamab, a B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)., Methods: Phase II eligible patients had RRMM that either progressed on/after ≥three lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and an anti-CD38 antibody or was triple-class (PI/IMiD/anti-CD38) refractory. Phase II treatment was once a week through week 14 and then once every 2 weeks. Phase II 200 mg patients who achieved a ≥very good partial response by week 24 received linvoseltamab once every 4 weeks. The primary end point in phase II was overall response rate (ORR)., Results: Among the 117 patients treated with 200 mg, the median age was 70 years, 39% had high-risk cytogenetics, and 28% had penta-refractory disease. At a median follow-up of 14.3 months, the ORR was 71%, with 50% achieving ≥complete response (CR). In 104 patients treated with 50 mg at a median follow-up of 7.4 months, the ORR was 48%, with 21% achieving ≥CR. The median duration of response (DOR) for 200 mg patients (n = 83) was 29.4 months (95% CI, 19.2 to not evaluable). Among 200 mg patients, the most common adverse events included cytokine release syndrome (35.0% Gr1, 10.3% Gr2, 0.9% Gr3), neutropenia (0.9% Gr2, 18.8% Gr3, 23.1% Gr4), and anemia (3.4% Gr1, 4.3% Gr2, 30.8% Gr3). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 7.7% of patients (2.6% each Gr1, Gr2, Gr3). Infections were reported in 74.4% of patients (33.3% Gr3, 2.6% Gr4); infection frequency and severity declined over time., Conclusion: Linvoseltamab 200 mg induced deep and durable responses, with a median DOR of 29.4 months, in patients with RRMM with an acceptable safety profile.

The randomized, phase 2 GRIFFIN study (NCT02874742) evaluated daratumumab plus lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We present final post hoc analyses (median follow-up, 49.6 months) of clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per revised definition (del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], t[14;20], and/or gain/amp[1q21]). Patients received 4 induction cycles (D-RVd/RVd), high-dose therapy/transplant, 2 consolidation cycles (D-RVd/RVd), and lenalidomide±daratumumab maintenance (≤ 2 years). Minimal residual disease-negativity (10 -5 ) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd in patients ≥ 65 years (67.9% vs 17.9%), with HRCAs (54.8% vs 32.4%), and with gain/amp(1q21) (61.8% vs 28.6%). D-RVd showed a trend toward improved progression-free survival versus RVd (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) in patients ≥ 65 years (0.29 [0.06-1.48]), with HRCAs (0.38 [0.14-1.01]), and with gain/amp(1q21) (0.42 [0.14-1.27]). In the functional high-risk subgroup (not MRD negative at the end of consolidation), the hazard ratio was 0.82 (0.35-1.89). Among patients ≥ 65 years, grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd (88.9% vs 77.8%), as were TEAEs leading to discontinuation of ≥ 1 treatment component (37.0% vs 25.9%). One D-RVd patient died due to an unrelated TEAE. These results support the addition of daratumumab to RVd in transplant-eligible patients with high-risk NDMM. Video Abstract., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In the phase 2 GRIFFIN trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02874742), daratumumab added to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-RVd) improved depth of response and progression-free survival (PFS) versus lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) alone in transplant-eligible (TE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Here, we present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30-item (QLQ-C30), EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module 20-item (QLQ-MY20), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) tools on day 1 of cycles 1, 2, and 3; on day 21 of cycle 4 (end of induction therapy); on day 1 of cycle 5; on day 21 of cycle 6 (end of posttransplant consolidation therapy); and at months 6, 12, 18, and 24 of maintenance therapy. Meaningful improvements from baseline were seen in most of the PRO scales with both treatments after consolidation and were sustained for at least 2 years of maintenance treatment. Large reductions from baseline (~20 points) were especially observed in pain symptoms for both treatment groups, although these were numerically higher for patients receiving D-RVd during the majority of the time points. In addition, improvements in key scales, such as global health status, fatigue symptoms, and physical functioning, were also seen with both D-RVd and RVd. These improvements in health-related quality of life contribute to the totality of evidence supporting the improvement in clinical outcomes such as response rates and PFS with D-RVd in induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy in TE patients with NDMM., (© 2024 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

In the MASTER study (NCT03224507), daratumumab+carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-KRd) demonstrated promising efficacy in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). In GRIFFIN (NCT02874742), daratumumab+lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) improved outcomes for transplant-eligible NDMM. Here, we present a post hoc analysis of patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs; del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], t[14;20], or gain/amp[1q21]). Among 123 D-KRd patients, 43.1%, 37.4%, and 19.5% had 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs. Among 120 D-RVd patients, 55.8%, 28.3%, and 10.8% had 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs. Rates of complete response or better (best on study) for 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs were 90.6%, 89.1%, and 70.8% for D-KRd, and 90.9%, 78.8%, and 61.5% for D-RVd. At median follow-up (MASTER, 31.1 months; GRIFFIN, 49.6 months for randomized patients/59.5 months for safety run-in patients), MRD-negativity rates as assessed by next-generation sequencing (10 -5 ) were 80.0%, 86.4%, and 83.3% for 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs for D-KRd, and 76.1%, 55.9%, and 61.5% for D-RVd. PFS was similar between studies and superior for 0 or 1 versus ≥2 HRCAs: 36-month PFS rates for D-KRd were 89.9%, 86.2%, and 52.4%, and 96.7%, 90.5%, and 53.5% for D-RVd. These data support the use of daratumumab-containing regimens for transplant-eligible NDMM with HCRAs; however, additional strategies are needed for ultra-high-risk disease (≥2 HRCAs). Video Abstract., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy is a debilitating demyelinating polyneuropathy with no approved therapies. Our primary objective was to ascertain lenalidomide safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in anti-MAG neuropathy., Methods: This phase 1b, open-label, single-arm, dose-finding trial was conducted from 2019 through 2022. The original design included a dose-escalation/extension phase followed by a dose-expansion phase. Three doses of lenalidomide were evaluated: 10, 15, and 25 mg. The main outcome was the MTD., Results: Eleven patients enrolled (10 men), with a mean age of 67.6 years (SD = 6.18, range 58-77 years) and mean disease duration of 8.5 years (SD = 10.9, range 1-40 years). The study terminated early due to higher-than-expected non-dose-limiting toxicity venous thromboembolism (VTE) events. The calculated MTD was 25 mg (posterior mean of toxicity probability was 0.01 with a 95% credible interval of 0.00, 0.06), but a recommended phase 2 dose of 15 mg was advised. For secondary exploratory outcomes, only EQ-5D (-0.95, 95% CI -1.81 to -0.09) and total IgM (-162 mg/dL, 95% CI -298 to -26) showed signs of improvement by month 12., Conclusions: Lenalidomide was associated with higher-than-expected VTE events in anti-MAG neuropathy patients, despite a calculated MTD of 25 mg. A recommended phase 2 dose of 15 mg was advised. Lenalidomide did not improve disability or impairment at 12 months, although this study was not powered for efficacy. The risks of long term lenalidomide may outweigh benefit for patients with anti-MAG neuropathy. Any future efficacy study should address VTE risk, as current myeloma guidelines appear inadequate., Trial Registration: Lenalidomide in Anti-MAG Neuropathy: Phase 1b Study, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03701711, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03701711. First submitted October 10, 2018. First patient enrolled in January 2019., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-RVd) in the GRIFFIN study improved the stringent complete response rate by the end of consolidation in transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Here, we report the findings of the predefined final analysis., Methods: GRIFFIN was an open-label, randomised, active-controlled, phase 2 trial done in 35 research centres in the USA. Patients had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with measurable disease by M protein or free light chain, were aged 18-70 years, had an ECOG performance score of 0-2, and were eligible for autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to four D-RVd or RVd induction cycles, autologous HSCT, two D-RVd or RVd consolidation cycles, and lenalidomide with or without daratumumab maintenance therapy for 2 years. Patients received 21-day cycles of oral lenalidomide (25 mg on days 1-14), subcutaneous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m 2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11), oral dexamethasone (40 mg weekly) with or without intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg weekly, cycles 1-4; day 1, cycles 5-6). Maintenance therapy (28-day cycles) was oral lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1-21) with or without daratumumab (16 mg/kg intravenously every 4 or 8 weeks, or 1800 mg subcutaneously monthly). Patients could continue lenalidomide maintenance after study treatment completion. The primary endpoint was stringent complete response rate by the end of consolidation in the response-evaluable population, and has already been reported. Here we report updated stringent complete response rates and secondary outcomes including progression-free survival and overall survival. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02874742) and ended on April 8, 2022., Findings: Between Dec 20, 2016, and April 10, 2018, 104 patients were randomly assigned to the D-RVd group and 103 were randomly assigned to the RVd group; most patients were White (85 [82%] in the D-RVd group and 76 [74%] in the RVd group) and male (58 [56%] in the D-RVd group and 60 [58%] in the RVd group). At a median follow-up of 49·6 months (IQR 47·4-52·1), D-RVd improved rates of stringent complete response (67 [67%] of 100] vs 47 [48%] of 98]; odds ratio 2·18 [95% CI 1·22-3·89], p=0·0079), and 4-year progression-free survival was 87·2% (95% CI 77·9-92·8) for D-RVd versus 70·0% (95% CI 55·9-80·3) for RVd, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·45 (95% CI 0·21-0·95, p=0·032) for risk of disease progression or death with D-RVd. Median overall survival was not reached for either group (HR 0·90 [95% CI 0·31-2·56], p=0·84). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events in the D-RVd versus RVd groups were neutropenia (46 [46%] of 99 vs 23 [23%] of 102), lymphopenia (23 [23%] vs 23 [23%]), leukopenia (17 [17%] vs eight [8%]), thrombocytopenia (16 [16%] vs nine [9%]), pneumonia (12 [12%] vs 14 [14%]), and hypophosphataemia (ten [10%] vs 11 [11%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 46 (46%) of 99 patients in the D-RVd group and in 53 (52%) of 102 patients in the RVd group. One patient in each treatment group reported a treatment-emergent adverse event that resulted in death (bronchopneumonia in the D-RVd group; cause unknown in the RVd group); neither was related to study treatment. No new safety concerns occurred with maintenance therapy., Interpretation: Addition of daratumumab to RVd improved the depth of response and progression-free survival in transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. These results justify further evaluation in phase 3 studies., Funding: Janssen Oncology., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests PMV served as a consultant for, served on an advisory board for, and received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Secura Bio. DWS served as a consultant or in an advisory role for GlaxoSmithKline, AbbVie, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Pfizer. JLK served as a consultant for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Roche/Genentech, and Tecnopharma; received research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fortis Therapeutics, Heidelberg Pharma, Janssen, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Sutro Biopharma, and Takeda; received honoraria from AbbVie, Janssen, Roche/Genentech, and Tecnopharma; and served on an advisory board for Incyte and TG Therapeutics. BR received honoraria from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, and PharmaEssentia. CR served as a consultant and on a speakers bureau for Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, and Karyopharm Therapeutics. ACh served as a consultant or in an advisory role for Amgen, Janssen Oncology, Seattle Genetics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Genzyme, Oncopeptides, Takeda, Antengene, GlaxoSmithKline, Secura Bio, Shattuck Labs, Genentech, AbbVie, and Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene; and received research funding from Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, and Pharmacyclics. RS served as a consultant or in an advisory role for Sanofi/Aventis, Janssen Oncology, and Oncopeptides; and received research funding from Sanofi. LJC served as a consultant or in an advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Sanofi; served on a speakers bureau for Amgen and Sanofi; received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Sanofi; and received research funding from Amgen and Janssen. LDA served as a consultant or in an advisory role for and received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Oncopeptides, Karyopharm Therapeutics, AbbVie, BeiGene, Cellectar, and Sanofi. NS served as a consultant for Amgen, CareDx, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Indapta Therapeutics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite, Oncopeptides, and Sanofi; and received research funding from bluebird bio, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, Nektar, Poseida, Precision BioSciences, Sutro Biopharma, and TeneoBio. NB received honoraria from OncLive; and served as a consultant or in an advisory role and on a speakers bureau for Janssen, Sanofi Genzyme, and Oncopeptides. YAE received research funding, received honoraria, and served on a speakers bureau for Janssen, Takeda, Oncopeptides, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Bristol Myers Squibb. SAH served as a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Oncopeptides, GlaxoSmithKline, Secura Bio, and Sanofi; and received research funding from Oncopeptides. CC received honoraria from Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Janssen. AJ served as a consultant or in an advisory role for and received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Sanofi. TMW served as a consultant for Janssen, Carevive, and Sanofi. RZO holds stock and other ownership interests in Asylia Therapeutics; received honoraria from and served as a consultant or in an advisory role for AbbVie, Biotheryx, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Meridian Therapeutics, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Neoleukin Corporation, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda; received research funding from Asylia Therapeutics, Biotheryx, and Heidelberg Pharma; and holds patents, royalties, or other intellectual property for Asylia Therapeutics. KHS served on an advisory board for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen; received research funding from AbbVie and Karyopharm Therapeutics; served on a speakers bureau for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Sanofi Genzyme; served as a consultant for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme; and received honoraria from Karyopharm Therapeutics. AJC served as a consultant for Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, EUSA Pharma, AbbVie, Sanofi, Cellectar, GlaxoSmithKline, and Secura Bio; and received research funding from Janssen, AbbVie, Sanofi, Harpoon, Bristol Myers Squibb, Adaptive Biotechnologies, and Nektar. SD is the Executive Officer for Alliance Foundation Trials for Clinical Trials. HP, ACo, and SP are employees of and hold stock and other ownership in Janssen. TSL is an employee of Janssen. SZU served as a consultant or in an advisory role for Celgene, Amgen, Janssen Oncology, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm Therapeutics, AbbVie, SkylineDx, Merck, Oncopeptides, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, and Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene; served on a speakers bureau for Takeda, Amgen, Janssen Oncology, Sanofi, and Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene; and received research funding from Celgene and Array BioPharma. PGR received research funding from Oncopeptides, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, and Karyopharm Therapeutics; and served on an advisory committee for Oncopeptides, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Janssen, Sanofi, Secura Bio, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron, AstraZeneca, and Protocol Intelligence. JL and NN declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Deposition of wild-type or mutant transthyretin (TTR) amyloid fibrils in the myocardium causes TTR amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Targeted therapeutics for ATTR-CM include TTR stabilizers (tafamidis and diflunisal) and oligonucleotide drugs (revusiran, patisiran, and inotersen). TTR stabilizers prevent dissociation of transthyretin tetramers. Transthyretin monomers can misfold and form amyloid fibrils. TTR stabilizers thereby limit amyloid fibrils development and deposition. Oligonucleotide drugs inhibit hepatic synthesis of transthyretin, which decreases transthyretin protein levels and thus the amyloid fibril substrate., Areas of Uncertainty: To study the safety and efficacy of targeted therapeutics in patients with ATTR-CM, we performed a pooled analysis. A random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool the data., Data Sources: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase databases using the search terms "cardiac amyloidosis" AND "tafamidis" OR "patisiran" OR "inotersen" OR "revusiran" OR "diflunisal.", Therapeutic Advances: We identified 6 studies that compared targeted therapeutics with placebo. One study was stopped prematurely because of increased mortality in the targeted therapeutics arm. Pooled analysis included 1238 patients, of which 738 patients received targeted therapeutics and 500 patients received placebo. When compared with placebo, targeted therapeutics significantly reduced all-cause mortality [OR 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16-0.97, P = 0.04]. Only 2 studies reported the effect on cardiovascular-related hospitalizations. There was a trend toward an improvement in global longitudinal strain (mean difference -0.69, 95% CI: -1.44 to 0.05, P = 0.07). When compared with placebo, there was no increase in serious adverse events with targeted therapeutics (OR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.78-1.44, P = 0.72)., Conclusion: Evidence from the pooled analysis revealed targeted therapeutics improve survival and are well-tolerated. These findings suggest a potential role for targeted therapeutics in the treatment of patients with ATTR-CM., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

In transplant-eligible patients who undergo upfront autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM), standard practice is to treat with six to eight cycles of induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT. A gap between the end of induction and the day of ASCT exists to allow stem cell mobilization and collection. Despite attempts to limit the length of this interval, we noticed that some patients experience interval progression (IP) of disease between the end of induction therapy and the day of ASCT. We analyzed 408 MM patients who underwent ASCT between 2011 and 2016. The median length of the interval between end of induction and ASCT was 38 days. We observed that 26% of patients in the entire cohort and 23.6% of patients who received induction with bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRD) experienced IP. These patients deepened their responses with ASCT, independently of induction regimen. In the entire cohort, IP was significantly associated with shorter PFS in the univariable analysis (Hazard Ratio, HR = 1.37, P = 0.022) but not in the multivariable analysis (HR = 1.14, P = 0.44). However, analyzing only patients who received VRD as induction, progression-free survival (PFS) remained inferior in both the univariable (HR = 2.02; P = 0.002) and the multivariable analyses (HR = 1.96; P = 0.01). T cells and natural killer (NK) cells are increasingly studied targets of immunomodulatory therapy, as immune dysfunction is known to occur in patients with MM. Peripheral blood from 35 MM patients were analyzed. At time of ASCT, patients with IP had significantly increased percentages of CD3 + CD8 + CD57 + CD28 - ( P = 0.05) and CD3 + CD4 + LAG3 + ( P = 0.0022) T-cells, as well as less CD56 bright and CD56 dim NK cells bearing activated markers such as CD69, NKG2D, and CD226. These data suggest that IP can impact the length of response to ASCT; therefore, further studies on the management of these patients are needed., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Bao, Zhao, Kudalkar, Rodriguez, Sharma, Bumma, Devarakonda, Khan, Umyarova, Rosko, Benson and Cottini.)

Background: Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) results in superior progression-free survival and overall survival. However, patients with high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) do not derive the same survival benefit from lenalidomide maintenance compared with standard-risk patients. The authors sought to determine the outcomes of bortezomib-based maintenance compared with lenalidomide maintenance in patients with HRMM undergoing ASCT., Methods: In total, the authors identified 503 patients with HRMM who were undergoing ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis from January 2013 to December 2018 after receiving triplet novel-agent induction in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. HRMM was defined as deletion 17p, t(14;16), t(4;14), t(14;20), or chromosome 1q gain., Results: Three hundred fifty-seven patients (67%) received lenalidomide alone, and 146 (33%) received bortezomib-based maintenance (with bortezomib alone in 58%). Patients in the bortezomib-based maintenance group were more likely to harbor two or more high-risk abnormalities and International Staging System stage III disease (30% vs. 22%; p = .01) compared with the lenalidomide group (24% vs. 15%; p < .01). Patients who were receiving lenalidomide maintenance had superior progression-free survival at 2 years compared with those who were receiving either bortezomib monotherapy or combination therapy (75% vs. 63%; p = .009). Overall survival at 2 years was also superior in the lenalidomide group (93% vs. 84%; p = .001)., Conclusions: No superior outcomes were observed in patients with HRMM who received bortezomib monotherapy or (to a lesser extent) in those who received bortezomib in combination as maintenance compared with lenalidomide alone. Until prospective data from randomized clinical trials are available, post-transplant therapy should be tailored to each patient with consideration for treating patients in clinical trials that target novel therapeutic strategies for HRMM, and lenalidomide should remain a cornerstone of treatment., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)

The standard preparative regimen for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) is 200 mg/m 2 of intravenous melphalan; however, a dose of 140 mg/m 2 is often used when concerns exist related to patient age, performance status, organ function, and other factors. It is unclear whether a lower dose of melphalan impacts post-transplant survival outcomes. We performed a retrospective review of 930 patients with MM who underwent ASCT with 200 mg/m 2 versus 140 mg/m 2 melphalan. On univariable analysis, no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed, however, an overall survival (OS) benefit was observed in patients receiving 200 mg/m 2 melphalan ( p  = 0.04). Multivariable analyses showed patients receiving 140 mg/m 2 faired no worse than those receiving 200 mg/m 2 . While a subset of younger patients with normal renal function may achieve superior OS with a standard dose of 200 mg/m 2 melphalan, these findings suggest an opportunity to individualize the ASCT preparative regimen to optimize outcomes.

For eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), standard of care includes induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Daratumumab as monotherapy and in combination treatment is approved across multiple lines of therapy for multiple myeloma (MM), and lenalidomide is an effective and commonly used agent for induction and maintenance therapy in MM. However, there is concern that lenalidomide and daratumumab given as induction therapy might impair mobilization of stem cells for ASCT. Therefore, we assessed stem cell mobilization in patients following frontline induction therapy in the MASTER and GRIFFIN phase 2 clinical studies by examining stem cell mobilization yields, apheresis attempts, and engraftment outcomes for patients from each study. Adult transplantation-eligible patients with NDMM received induction therapy consisting of daratumumab plus carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-KRd) for four 28-day cycles in the single-arm MASTER trial or lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (RVd) with or without daratumumab (D) for four 21-day cycles in the randomized GRIFFIN trial, followed by stem cell mobilization and ASCT in both studies. Institutional practice differed regarding plerixafor use for stem cell mobilization; the strategies were upfront (ie, planned plerixafor use) or rescue (ie, plerixafor use only after mobilization parameters indicated failure with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] alone). Descriptive analyses were used to summarize patient characteristics, stem cell mobilization yields, and engraftment outcomes. In MASTER, 116 D-KRd recipients underwent stem cell mobilization and collection at a median of 24 days after completing induction therapy. In GRIFFIN, 175 patients (D-RVd, n = 95; RVd, n = 80) underwent mobilization at a median of 27 days after completing D-RVd induction therapy and 24 days after completing RVd induction therapy. Among those who underwent mobilization and collection, 7% (8 of 116) of D-KRd recipients, 2% (2 of 95) of D-RVd recipients, and 6% (5 of 80) of RVd recipients did not meet the center-specific minimally required CD34 +  cell yield in the first mobilization attempt; however, nearly all collected sufficient stem cells for ASCT on remobilization. Among patients who underwent mobilization, plerixafor use, either upfront or as a rescue strategy, was higher in patients receiving D-KRd (97%; 112 of 116) and D-RVd (72%; 68 of 95) compared with those receiving RVd (55%; 44 of 80). The median total CD34 +  cell collection was 6.0 × 10 6 /kg (range, 2.2 to 13.9 × 10 6 /kg) after D-KRd induction, 8.3 × 10 6 /kg (range, 2.6 to 33.0 × 10 6 /kg) after D-RVd induction, and 9.4 × 10 6 /kg (range, 4.1 to 28.7 × 10 6 /kg) after RVd induction; the median days for collection were 2, 2, and 1, respectively. Among patients who underwent mobilization, 98% (114 of 116) of D-KRd patients, 99% (94 of 95) of D-RVd patients, and 98% (78 of 80) of RVd patients underwent ASCT using median CD34 +  cell doses of 3.2 × 10 6 /kg, 4.2 × 10 6 /kg, and 4.8 × 10 6 /kg, respectively. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 12 days in all 3 treatment groups across the 2 trials. Because both trials used different criteria to define platelet recovery, data on platelet engraftment using the same criteria are not available. Four cycles of daratumumab- and lenalidomide-based quadruplet induction therapy had a minimal impact on stem cell mobilization and allowed predictable stem cell harvesting and engraftment in all patients who underwent ASCT. Upfront plerixafor strategy may be considered, but many patients were successfully collected with the use of G-CSF alone or rescue plerixafor., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement SC received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Omeros, and Sanofi and institutional research funding from Janssen, Amgen, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Allogene, Ionis, Novartis, Syndax, and GlaxoSmithKline, and is co-chair of the SWOG S1803 clinical trial. NLW received consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and holds stock in Gilead. LJC served as a consultant and received honoraria from Amgen, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Karyopharm, Pfizer, and Sanofi; received research funding from Amgen, Janssen, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and served on speakers bureaus for Amgen and Sanofi. JLK served as a consultant for Genentech, AbbVie, Janssen, Incyte, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, and Tecnopharma; received research funding from Genentech, AbbVie, Janssen, Amgen, Fortis Therapeutics, Heidelberg Pharma, Novartis, Sutro Biopharma, and Takeda; received honoraria from Tecnopharma, AbbVie, Janssen, Roche/Genentech, and Tecnopharma; and held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Incyte and TG Therapeutics. DWS served as a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Sanofi; and served as a consultant and held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Janssen and AbbVie. BR received honoraria from Incyte, Takeda, and PharmaEssentia; served as a consultant for PharmaEssentia; and served on a speakers bureau for Bristol Myers Squibb. CR served as a consultant and on speakers bureaus for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Takeda, Amgen, and Karyopharm; and received honoraria and served as a consultant for Oncopeptides. AC served as a consultant and held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Janssen Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Amgen, Karyopharm, Sanofi Genzyme, Oncopeptides, GlaxoSmithKline, Secura Bio, Shattuck Labs, Genentech, AbbVie, and Antengene; served as a consultant for Takeda, Novartis, and Millennium/Takeda; held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committee for Seattle Genetics; and received research funding from Janssen Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, and Millennium/Takeda. RS held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Sanofi Genzyme and Janssen Pharmaceuticals and received research funding from Sanofi Genzyme. LDA served as a consultant, received honoraria, held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committee, and received research funding from Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, BeiGene, Prothena, and Amgen. SB received grants from Amyloid Foundation and honoraria from Adaptive Biotechnology. BD served as a consultant for Janssen, Sanofi, Genentech, and AbbVie; received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Karyopharm, and Janssen; and served on an advisory board for Janssen, Natera, Arcellx Takeda, Amgen, and Sanofi. NS served as a consultant for Amgen, CareDx, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Indapta Therapeutics, Karyopharm, Kite, Oncopeptides, and Sanofi; and received research funding from bluebird bio, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, Nektar, Poseida, Precision BioSciences, Sutro Biopharma, and TeneoBio. NB held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Sanofi and Janssen; and served on a speakers bureau for Sanofi and Amgen. SAH served as a consultant for BMS/Celgene, Genetech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Secura Bio, and Takeda and received research funding from Oncopeptides. CC received honoraria and research funding from Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, and Bristol Myers Squibb; served as a consultant for Takeda, Celgene, and Janssen; and received research funding from Celgene and Poseida. AJ held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Sanofi, Karyopharm, Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gracell, and Celgene. TMW served as a consultant for Janssen, Carevive, Seattle Genetics, and Sanofi. TS served as a consultant for Sanofi and Janssen. RZO served as a consultant and received honoraria from Amgen, BioTheryX, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, EcoR1 Capital LLC, Genzyme, GSK Biologicals, Janssen, Karyopharm, Neoleukin Corporation, Oncopeptides AB, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, and Takeda; received research funding from CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda, Asylia Therapeutics, Inc., BioTheryX, Inc., and Heidelberg Pharma; holds individual stocks in a privately held company and patents and royalties for Asylia Therapeutics, Inc.; and held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Amgen, BioTheryX, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Celg, (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of salvage autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (sAHCT2) for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the era of modern therapeutics is unclear. As prospective data is limited, we conducted a retrospective analysis to determine the outcomes of sAHCT2., Patients and Methods: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective analysis of patients who received sAHCT2 at The Ohio State University from 2000 to 2018. Patients who received a second transplant as part of a planned tandem or autologous-allogeneic transplant were excluded., Results: Fifty-seven patients were treated with sAHCT2. Patients had a median of 2 lines of therapy after AHCT1 prior to their sAHCT2; 70% had prior immunomodulatory imide drugs, 82% had prior proteasome inhibitor, and 20% had prior anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies as part of re-induction therapy. Forty-two percent of patients attained ≥VGPR prior to sAHCT2. Seventy-four were treated with melphalan 200 mg/m 2 as conditioning regimen before infusion of a median of 3.8 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg. Fifty-eight percent patients had maintenance therapy and 81% patients attained CR/VGPR as the best response after sAHCT2. The median PFS and OS after sAHCT2 were 1.6 and 3.6 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, high-risk cytogenetics, not having attained CR/VGPR, and having more than 2 lines of therapy post-AHCT1 were associated with inferior PFS. Melphalan 140 mg/m 2 compared to melphalan 200 mg/m 2 and no maintenance therapy compared to maintenance therapy were not associated with inferior PFS. There was no transplant-related mortality in this patient cohort., Conclusions: For MM patients deriving durable remission after their AHCT1, sAHCT2 was safe and resulted in deep and durable remissions., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: High-dose melphalan (HDM) with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) after induction chemotherapy is considered standard of care in transplant-eligible patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Alkeran melphalan has propylene glycol as a solvent (PG-mel) while Evomela utilizes a propylene glyclol-free formulation (PGF-mel). We evaluated the differences in efficacy and safety of the 2 formulations as there are no prospective head-to-head trials., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all 259 consecutive MM patients who received PGF-mel as part of HDM-AHCT at The Ohio State University (OSU). The comparator group was the preceding 255 patients who received PG-mel., Results: Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Post-AHCT rates of relapse were comparable in the PG-mel and PGF-mel groups. Some adverse events were observed at a higher frequency in the PG-mel group compared to the PGF-mel group (grade ≥ 2 mucositis, febrile neutropenia, other infectious complications, and acute renal insufficiency). Time to neutrophil engraftment was slightly longer in the PG-mel group while time to platelet engraftment was longer in PGF-mel group. Red cell transfusion requirement was higher with the use of PG-mel but not platelet transfusion. Duration of hospitalization was slightly shorter with PGF-mel but readmission rates within 30 days of discharge were higher., Conclusion: Considering possible confounding factors could possibly account for observed differences in some adverse events, the comparable treatment responses, and difference in cost of the 2 formulation, The OSU reverted to PG-mel as the preferred formulation for HDM-AHCT in MM., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Amyloidosis refers to a group of conditions where abnormal protein-or amyloid-deposits in tissues or organs, often leading to organ malfunction. Amyloidosis affects nearly any organ system, but especially the heart, kidneys, liver, peripheral nervous system, and gastrointestinal tract. Neuromuscular deficits comprise some of its ubiquitous manifestations. Amyloidosis can be quite challenging to diagnose given its clinical heterogeneity and multi-system nature. Early diagnosis with accurate genetic and serologic subtyping is key for effective management and prevention of organ decline. In this review, we highlight the value of a multidisciplinary comprehensive amyloidosis clinic. While such a model exists at numerous clinical and research centers across the globe, the lack of more widespread adoption of such a model remains a major hindrance to the timely diagnosis of amyloidosis. Such a multidisciplinary care model allows for the timely and effective diagnosis of amyloidosis, be it acquired amyloid light amyloidosis (AL), hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (hATTR), or wild type amyloidosis (TTR-wt), especially in the current era of personalized genomic medicine. A multidisciplinary clinic optimizes the delivery of singular or combinatorial drug therapies, depending on amyloid type, fibril deposition location, and disease progression. Such an arrangement also helps advance research in the field. We present our experience at The Ohio State University, as one example out of many, to highlight the centrality of a multi-disciplinary clinic in amyloidosis care., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Bumma, Kahwash, Parikh, Isfort, Freimer, Vallakati, Redder, Campbell, Sharma, Efebera and Stino.)

Maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) is the standard treatment and recommended to be continued until disease progression. However, in the real world, patients discontinue treatment due to various reasons. We sought to determine the effect of early versus late discontinuation on survival outcomes in MM patients who underwent ASCT at The Ohio State University. We retrospectively reviewed 340 patients who underwent ASCT from 2005 to 2016 and received maintenance therapy for at least six months without progression. We compared the outcomes of patients who received maintenance for three years or less (early group) to the patients who continued maintenance beyond three years (late group). Lenalidomide (89%) and bortezomib (10%) were the most common agents used for maintenance chemotherapy. In Kaplan−Meier analysis, patients in the late group had prolonged progression-free (PFS) (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001). The 5-year estimated OS in late group was 96% vs. 79% in the early group and 5-year PFS was 80% in late group vs. 50% in the early group. The most common reasons for discontinuation of maintenance in early group were adverse events (55.9%) and patient preference (22.5%). For the late group, it was disease progression (23.9%) and adverse events (14.3%). Fifty-five percent of patients in the late group were still on maintenance treatment at the last follow-up. Continuation of maintenance therapy was thus associated with improved outcomes, while adverse events prevented most patients from continuing treatment.

Background: Beta-adrenergic antagonists or blockers (BB) are a cornerstone of cardiac therapy for multiple indications. However, BB are considered relatively contraindicated in amyloid cardiomyopathy due to poor tolerance. This intolerance is hypothesized to be due to concomitant neuropathy and significant restrictive cardiomyopathy. This study analyzes the incidence and characteristics of BB tolerance in patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy., Methods: Through a single-center retrospective chart review, patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy, confirmed by endomyocardial biopsy or technetium-99 pyrophosphate scan, were identified and clinical data was collected. Statistical methods included Chi-square test and two sample t -tests., Results: Of 135 cardiac amyloidosis patients, 27 patients (20.0%) had no BB use, 56 patients (41.5%) were current BB users, and 52 patients (38.5%) were prior BB users. The most frequent indications for BB use were heart failure, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and arrhythmia. The most common reason for stopping BB therapy was hypotension (62.8%) followed by fatigue, bradycardia, and orthostasis. Neurologic symptoms at the initial BB prescription or most recent evaluation were not significantly different between current and prior BB users. Their cardiovascular profiles were similar by ejection fraction, wall thickness, troponin I, and brain natriuretic peptide. There was no association for BB discontinuation based on amyloid subtype, sex, or race., Conclusion: The majority of patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy were prescribed BB, and over half of these patients still tolerated BB therapy. Current and prior BB users had similar profiles from a cardiovascular and neurologic perspective, with no association identified to predict BB discontinuation., Competing Interests: CC reports research support from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Akari Therapeutics, and Pfizer, Inc and consultant fees from Alnylam. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Ramsell, Arias Bermudez, Takem Baiyee, Rodgers, Parikh, Almaani, Sharma, LoRusso, Freimer, Redder, Bumma, Vallkati, Efebera, Kahwash and Campbell.)

In the phase 3 ANDROMEDA trial, patients treated with daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (D-VCd) had significantly higher rates of organ and hematologic response compared with patients who received VCd alone. Here, we present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the ANDROMEDA trial. PROs were assessed through cycle 6 using three standardized questionnaires. Treatment effect through cycle 6 was measured by a repeated-measures, mixed-effects model. The magnitude of changes in PROs versus baseline was generally low, but between-group differences favored the D-VCd group. Results were generally consistent irrespective of hematologic, cardiac, or renal responses. More patients in the D-VCd group experienced meaningful improvements in PROs; median time to improvement was more rapid in the D-VCd group versus the VCd group. After cycle 6, patients in the D-VCd group received daratumumab monotherapy and their PRO assessments continued, with improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) reported through cycle 19. PROs of subgroups with renal and cardiac involvement were consistent with those of the intent-to-treat population. These results demonstrate that the previously reported clinical benefits of D-VCd were achieved without decrement to patients' HRQoL and provide support of D-VCd in patients with AL amyloidosis., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Multiple myeloma (MM) represents 1.8% of all new cancer cases in the U.S. While not curable, advances in treatment, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and maintenance therapy, have dramatically improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We performed a retrospective survival analysis on newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving ASCT from 1992−2016 at the Ohio State University. A total of 1001 consecutive NDMM patients were eligible. Patients were split into five groups based on historic changes in novel agents for the treatment of MM. Across the years (1992−2016), there was a statistically significant improvement in both PFS (p < 0.01) and OS (p < 0.01). Significant improvements in both PFS and OS were seen in patients ≤65 years (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002) and >65 years old (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001), respectively. Improved PFS and OS were seen in both standard-risk (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) and high-risk patients (p < 0.001 and p = 0.019). The post-transplant response showed statistically significant improvement across the years (p < 0.01). Survival rates for NDMM patients have significantly improved primarily due to the inclusion of novel therapies and post-ASCT maintenance.

T-Cell malignancies are a group of heterogeneous disorders composed of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs), peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs), and T-cell leukemias, including T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL). Cases of patients with combined T-cell malignancies and plasma cell dyscrasias (PCD) are reported in the literature, but these are mostly limited to case reports or small case series with <10 patients. Here, we described the clinical course of 26 patients and report baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rates (ORRs) in this unique population. There was no survival difference in patients with CTCL or T-LGLL and concomitant PCD when treated with standard therapy directed at the T-cell malignancy when compared to historical controls. However, patients with PTCL and concomitant PCD had significantly inferior outcomes with rapid progression and worse OS and PFS at 1.7 years (p=0.006) and 4.8 months (p=0.08), respectively, when compared to historical controls for patients with PTCL, although the limited number of patients included in this analysis precludes drawing definitive conclusions. Treatment directed at the T-cell malignancy resulted in the eradication of the PCD clone in multiple patients (15.4%) including one with multiple myeloma (MM) who experienced a complete response after starting therapy directed at the T-cell malignancy. For patients with T-cell malignancies and concomitant PCD, treatment with standard T-cell-directed therapies is recommended based on this analysis with continued follow-up and monitoring of the concomitant PCD. Further studies are needed to definitively elucidate the increased risk of relapse in patients with PTCL and concomitant PCD, and larger, multi-center cohorts are needed to validate these findings across T-cell malignancies and PCDs., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Braunstein, McLaughlin, Ruiz, Wei, Bumma, Benson, Devarakonda, Chaudhry, Khan, Cottini, Hanel, Baiocchi, Chung, Addison, Couette, Meara, Jarjour, Porcu, Mishra, Reneau, Rosko and Brammer.)

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) is a potential curative therapy for a variety of hematologic disorders. However, it requires highly specialized care that is only available at select centers across the country. Thus, minority populations are at risk for healthcare disparities in access to and outcomes of allo-HCT. Our study aimed to assess the impact of race and location of residence on outcomes of allo-HCT., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent allo-HCT at the Ohio State University from 1984 to 2018. Patients were divided by race (Caucasian, African American, and other) and grouped by zip code into rural, suburban, and urban groups. Primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Of the 1,943 patients included in the study, 94.3% self-identified as Caucasian, 4.6% African American, and 1.1% other. In total, 63.4% lived in rural areas, 22.9% suburban, and 13.8% urban. There was no significant difference in OS or PFS by race ( p  = 0.15, 0.21) or place of residence ( p  = 0.39, 0.17). In addition, no difference in nonrelapse mortality, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) was seen among the race or place of residence., Conclusion: Our study suggests that when appropriate access to HCT is given, there is no difference in outcomes based on race, ethnicity or place of primary residence. Further research is needed to further evaluate barriers for these patients to undergo transplant and help mitigate these barriers., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Sigmund, Zhao, Jiang, Elder, Benson, Rosko, Bumma, Khan, Devarakonda, Vasu, Jaglowski, Mims, Choe, Larkin, Brammer, Wall, Grieselhuber, Saad, Penza, Efebera and Sharma.)

Hematologic malignancies are most likely to present in the seventh and eighth decades of life. Continued population growth will lead to increasing numbers of older adults with hematologic malignancies. Oncology care for older adults is complex and must account for the effect of aging on disease biology and treatment tolerance. Multidisciplinary oncology care has been utilized in solid tumor oncology for decades, initially driven by the need for multi-modality treatment. In this review, we make the case for multidisciplinary oncogeriatric care for older adults with hematologic malignancies in order to best navigate the intersection of aging and blood cancer., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

The role of maintenance therapy after high-dose chemotherapy and first autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma (MM) is well established. We explored the effect of maintenance therapy on outcomes after salvage second autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT2) using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. Outcomes of interest included non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse/progression (REL), progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS). Of 522 patients who underwent AHCT2 between 2010 and 2018, 342 received maintenance therapy and 180 did not. Maintenance regimens included lenalidomide (42%), pomalidomide (13%), and bortezomib (13%). Median follow up was 58 months in the maintenance group and 61.5 months in the no-maintenance group. Univariate analysis showed superior outcomes at 5 years in maintenance compared to the no-maintenance group: NRM 2 (0.7-3.9)% vs 9.9 (5.9-14.9)%, (p < 0.01), REL 70.2 (64.4-75.8)% vs 80.3 (73.6-86.3)% (p < 0.01), PFS 27.8 (22.4-33.5)% vs. 9.8 (5.5-15.2)% (p < 0.01), and OS 54 (47.5-60.5)% vs 30.9 (23.2-39.2)% (p < 0.01), respectively. Use of maintenance therapy retained its association with improved outcomes in multivariate analysis. There was no difference in second cancers in the two groups (p = 0.39). We conclude that maintenance after AHCT2 is associated with improved 5-year outcomes., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Systemic immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by deposition of amyloid fibrils of light chains produced by clonal CD38+ plasma cells. Daratumumab, a human CD38-targeting antibody, may improve outcomes for this disease., Methods: We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis to receive six cycles of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone either alone (control group) or with subcutaneous daratumumab followed by single-agent daratumumab every 4 weeks for up to 24 cycles (daratumumab group). The primary end point was a hematologic complete response., Results: A total of 388 patients underwent randomization. The median follow-up was 11.4 months. The percentage of patients who had a hematologic complete response was significantly higher in the daratumumab group than in the control group (53.3% vs. 18.1%) (relative risk ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 4.1; P<0.001). Survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression favored the daratumumab group (hazard ratio for major organ deterioration, hematologic progression, or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; P = 0.02). At 6 months, more cardiac and renal responses occurred in the daratumumab group than in the control group (41.5% vs. 22.2% and 53.0% vs. 23.9%, respectively). The four most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were lymphopenia (13.0% in the daratumumab group and 10.1% in the control group), pneumonia (7.8% and 4.3%, respectively), cardiac failure (6.2% and 4.8%), and diarrhea (5.7% and 3.7%). Systemic administration-related reactions to daratumumab occurred in 7.3% of the patients. A total of 56 patients died (27 in the daratumumab group and 29 in the control group), most due to amyloidosis-related cardiomyopathy., Conclusions: Among patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone was associated with higher frequencies of hematologic complete response and survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ANDROMEDA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03201965.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from a haploidentical (haplo) donor has emerged as a suitable alternative in the absence of a matched donor. However, haplo-HCT patients have a higher risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Hence, bone marrow (BM) stem cell source and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) have been routinely used to help mitigate this. Due to ease of collection, peripheral blood (PB) stem cells are increasingly being considered for haplo-HCT. We retrospectively analyzed 74 patients (42 BM and 32 PB) who underwent haplo-HCT at Ohio State University from 2009 to 2018. Median age at transplant was 60 years (yrs) for BM and 54 yrs for PB, ( p = 0.45). There was no difference in OS ( p = 0.13) and NRM ( p = 0.75) as well as PFS ( p = 0.10) or GRFS ( p = 0.90) between the groups. The BM cohort showed a 3-year OS rate of 63% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46-76), and 3-year PFS of 49% (95% CI: 33-63). For the PB group, 3-year OS and PFS were 78% (95% CI: 59-89) and 68% (95% CI: 49-82), respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of acute GVHD (grade II-IV) ( p = 0.31) and chronic GVHD ( p = 0.18). Patients receiving BM had a significantly higher risk for relapse with relapse rates by 2 years at 36% (95% CI: 22-50) vs. 16% (95% CI: 6-31) for PB ( p = 0.03). The findings from this study suggest that PB is an excellent alternative to BM for haplo-HCT.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease with a limited life expectancy of five years from diagnosis. Uncontrolled disease or infections are the main causes of mortality. Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody against CD38, is approved to treat patients with MM. Its target, CD38, is expressed not only on MM cells but also on common lymphoid precursors and subsets of normal lymphocytes. Daratumumab-induced lymphopenia is common, but its clinical significance is understudied. In this study, we report the baseline characteristics, rates of severe lymphopenia, infections, and clinical trajectory of multiple myeloma patients (n = 100) treated with daratumumab-based regimens at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. We discover high rates of infections, hospital utilization, and severe lymphopenia and identify risks factors for severe lymphopenia, such as low pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) values. Severe lymphopenia persists in 23% of patients, resulting in worst survival outcomes. Our data underline the importance of monitoring ALC and consider future use of prophylactic measures or alternative regimens in subsets of MM patients., Competing Interests: AK is a consultant for Janssen and Amgen. MC is a consultant for Sanofi. NB is on the speaker bureau for Amgen. YE is on the speaker bureau for Takeda and Akcea. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Cottini, Huang, Williams, Bumma, Khan, Chaudhry, Devarakonda, Efebera, Benson and Rosko.)

Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). Tacrolimus (TAC), a calcineurin inhibitor that prevents T-cell activation, is commonly used as a GVHD prophylaxis. However, there is variability in the serum concentrations of TAC, and little is known on the impact of early TAC levels on aGVHD. We retrospectively analyzed 673 consecutive patients undergoing allo-HSCT at the Ohio State University between 2002 and 2016. Week 1 TAC was associated with a lower risk of aGVHD II-IV at TAC level ≥10.15 ng/mL ( p = 0.03) compared to the lowest quartile. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1, 3 and 5 years was 33%, 38% and 41%, respectively. TAC levels at week 2, ≥11.55 ng/mL, were associated with an increased risk of relapse ( p = 0.01) compared to the lowest quartile. Subset analysis with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients showed significantly reduced aGVHD with TAC level ≥10.15 ng/mL at week 1 and a higher risk of relapse associated with week 2 TAC level ≥11.55 ng/mL ( p = 0.02). Hence, achieving ≥10 ng/mL during the first week of HCT may mitigate the risk of aGVHD. However, levels (>11 ng/mL) beyond the first week may be associated with suppressed graft versus tumor effect and higher relapse.

Background: Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a clonal plasma-cell neoplasm that carries a poor prognosis. Although AL amyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma (MM) can co-exist and share various cytogenetic chromosomal abnormalities, little is known about Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and its prognostic relevance in AL amyloidosis., Aim: The study aims to evaluate the most prevalent FISH cytogenetic abnormalities in AL patients as independent prognostic factors, and assess the impact of cytogenetics on the survival of high-risk cardiac AL patients., Materials & Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 113 consecutive AL patients treated at The Ohio State University (OSU). Patients were divided into subgroups based on FISH data obtained within 90 days of diagnosis. Hyperdiploidy was defined as trisomies of at least 2 chromosomal loci. Primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan Meier curves were used to calculate PFS and OS. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models were used to test the equality of survival functions and further evaluate the differences between groups., Results: FISH abnormalities were detected in 76% of patients. Patients with abnormal FISH trended toward lower overall survival (OS) (p=0.06) and progression free survival (PFS) (p=0.06). The two most prevalent aberrations were translocation t(11;14) (39%) and hyperdiploidy-overall (38%). Hyperdiploidy-overall was associated with worsening PFS (p=0.018) and OS (p=0.03), confirmed in multivariable analysis. Patients with del 13q most frequently had cardiac involvement (p=0.006) and was associated with increased bone marrow plasmacytosis (p=0.02). Cardiac AL patients with no FISH abnormalities had much improved OS (p=0.012) and PFS (p=0.018) CONCLUSIONS: Our findings ultimately reveal the association of hyperdiploidy on survival in AL amyloidosis patients, including the high-risk cardiac AL population., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an effective treatment option for many patients with systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis. While maintenance post ASCT in multiple myeloma is now standard, the decision to utilize maintenance in AL amyloidosis remains largely unexplored. The present study aims to determine the prognostic significance of utilizing maintenance therapy following ASCT and assess the impact of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) abnormalities, bone marrow plasma cell burden (BMPC), and degree of organ involvement on this decision., Methods and Results: This is a retrospective analysis of fifty AL amyloidosis patients who underwent ASCT at The Ohio State University. Twenty-eight patients received maintenance and twenty-two did not. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare the effect of maintenance therapy with no significant difference in PFS ( p = 0.66) and OS ( p = 0.32) between the two groups. There was no difference in survival based on maintenance when further categorized by FISH, PFS ( p = 0.15), and OS ( p = 0.65); BMPC ≥ 10%, PFS ( p = 0.49), and OS ( p = 0.32); or with 2 or more organs involved, PFS ( p = 0.34) and OS ( p = 0.80)., Conclusion: Maintenance therapy post ASCT did not impact PFS or OS when categorized by FISH abnormalities, increasing BMPC, or ≥2 organs involved in AL amyloidosis patients.

The novel clinical data for plasma cell neoplasms (smoldering myeloma, multiple myeloma, and AL amyloidosis) that were presented in the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology virtual scientific symposium are summarized here. Data from large phase-3 studies (CASSIOPEIA, ENDURANCE, and TOURMALINE-MM4 trials) and phase-2 studies (SWOG 1211, GMMG CONCEPT trials) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation are described. Updates from previous important studies for multiple myeloma (STaMINA) along with studies on three different chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-) T cell products are also described. Results of clinical studies involving the use of anti-myeloma drugs with novel mechanisms of action such as immunoconjugates, selinexor, venetoclax, monoclonal antibodies, and data on minimal residual disease (MRD) are discussed. These data provide an overview of the efficacy and safety of the various treatments in multiple myeloma and could lead to changes in our clinical practice, which could pave the path for a "cure" in myeloma.

Heavy chain disorders are rare B-cell disorders and include heavy chain disease, heavy chain deposition disease, and heavy chain amyloidosis. These disorders share the pathognomonic finding of a truncated immunoglobulin heavy chain without an associated light chain in the serum or urine in the case of heavy chain disease or in the tissues in the case of heavy chain deposition disease and heavy chain amyloidosis but are clinically distinct entities. The clinical recognition and systematic approaches to these disorders are challenging because of the rarity of the diseases, lack of consensus on treatment approaches, and minimal data with novel therapy. Herein we present a review of the literature and 5 consecutive cases at a single institution of gamma heavy chain disease and heavy chain deposition disease treated with novel agents including regimens of CRd (cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone), CyBorD (cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone), R-CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone), BR (bendamustine and rituximab), V-EPOCH (bortezomib, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin), and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although no therapies are approved for light chain (AL) amyloidosis, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) is considered standard of care. Based on outcomes of daratumumab in multiple myeloma (MM), the phase 3 ANDROMEDA study (NCT03201965) is evaluating daratumumab-CyBorD vs CyBorD in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. We report results of the 28-patient safety run-in. Patients received subcutaneous daratumumab (DARA SC) weekly in cycles 1 to 2, every 2 weeks in cycles 3 to 6, and every 4 weeks thereafter for up to 2 years. CyBorD was given weekly for 6 cycles. Patients had a median of 2 involved organs (kidney, 68%; cardiac, 61%). Patients received a median of 16 (range, 1-23) treatment cycles. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with DARA SC in MM and CyBorD. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 1 patient (grade 1). No grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred; 5 patients died, including 3 after transplant. Overall hematologic response rate was 96%, with a complete hematologic response in 15 (54%) patients; at least partial response occurred in 20, 22, and 17 patients at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Renal response occurred in 6 of 16, 7 of 15, and 10 of 15 patients, and cardiac response occurred in 6 of 16, 6 of 13, and 8 of 13 patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Hepatic response occurred in 2 of 3 patients at 12 months. Daratumumab-CyBorD was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns versus the intravenous formulation, and demonstrated robust hematologic and organ responses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03201965., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is an indolent, premalignant plasma cell disorder with the potential of transforming into symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). There are multiple risk factors that contribute to transformation. Agent Orange (AO) has been linked with multiple malignant and nonmalignant conditions., Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with monoclonal gammopathy who were seen at John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Detroit, Michigan) between 2005 and 2015 with MGUS, smoldering multiple myeloma, and MM. We explored baseline patient characteristics and explored AO exposure. Dates of diagnosis, dates of progression, and expiration dates were recorded to time to progression and overall survival (OS)., Results: We identified 211 patients with monoclonal gammopathy; 96% were male and 122 were African American. Eleven patients had reported AO exposure. Cumulative risk of progression in the overall population was 1.4% at 1 year. Risk of transformation in the population exposed to AO was significantly higher with a hazard ratio (HR) of 11.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.10-59.47; P = .005). OS was numerically shorter in AO-exposed patients with a median OS of 7 years compared with 11.1 years in those not exposed. However, AO exposure was not associated with OS in multivariable analysis (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.07-3.83; P = .508)., Conclusion: Monoclonal gammopathy is a premalignant condition with the risk of progressing to MM. Exposure to AO has been implicated in multiple conditions including MM. Our study demonstrates an increased risk of progression in exposed patients., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) maintenance therapy with lenalidomide is standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Effective and tolerable drug combinations may further enhance the clinical response post-ASCT. Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, induces antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects in patients with MM. We hypothesized that combination maintenance therapy would further prolong the clinical response achieved from transplantation. We previously reported that the combination of lenalidomide and vorinostat as maintenance post-ASCT was tolerable in 16 patients with MM. We now present the long-term follow up of these patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were characterized using the Kaplan-Meier method. Five patients (31%) had high-risk disease, and the median number of lines of therapy before ASCT was 1 (range, 1 to 5). With a median follow-up of 89.8 months from ASCT, the median PFS was 64.3 months (range, 21.7 months to not reached [NR]), and OS was not reached (median, 53.0 months to NR). At the time of this report, 5 patients remained on the study. The combination of vorinostat and lenalidomide as maintenance post-ASCT is tolerable and induces a durable response. A phase III randomized study of lenalidomide versus a combination with vorinostat is warranted., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction : Despite rapid advances in myeloma treatment with the development of new drugs, curative therapies remain elusive. Relapsed/refractory disease related to progressive dysregulation of immune system and acquired genetic abnormalities continues to be a major obstacle in achieving cure. Immune-based therapy harnessing the host defense mechanism of natural killer (NK) cells is a promising avenue in the treatment of myeloma. Areas covered : Here, we discuss the biology and cytotoxic activity of NK cells and the potential role of these innate immune cells in defense against cancer and specifically multiple myeloma. We also discuss the role of NK cells in the anti-myeloma effects of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, various novel drugs, and treatment modalities such as chimeric antigen receptor therapy. Immune evasion, either directly or indirectly involving NK cell dysfunction, may be a key and under-recognized mechanism in myeloma progression. We reviewed extensive literature identified using the keywords immunotherapy, natural killer cells, and multiple myeloma. Expert opinion : Novel treatment approaches in myeloma utilizing the immunomodulatory and cytotoxic properties of NK cells to eradicate resistant and quiescent clones could pave the way for potentially curative interventions.

Background: There is an unmet need to determine factors predictive of clinical benefit, to guide therapeutic sequencing and selection in metastatic RCC (mRCC). We evaluated clinical factors such as the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and duration of prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, as predictors of response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in mRCC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)., Methods: Regulatory approval was obtained. A single center retrospective chart review of mRCC patients at Karmanos Cancer Institute, treated with ICI based therapy (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) was conducted. Data were collected on demographics, smoking status, prognostic scoring (Memorial Sloan Kettering and Heng criteria), NLR pretherapy, post 1 and 4 doses of ICI, and duration of prior anti-VEGF therapy ≥6 months or <6., Results: 42 patients were evaluated with median age of 61 years (range, 24-85). Pretherapy NLR < 3 and ≥3 was seen in 19 (45%) and 23 (55%) patients, respectively. 24 (57%) and 18 (43%) patients had prior anti-VEGF inhibitors for a duration of ≥6 months and <6 months, respectively. 12 (29%), 22 (52%) and 8 (19%) patients had favorable, intermediate and poor risk disease based on Heng criteria, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed pretherapy NLR ≥3 was predictive of shorter PFS and OS when treated with ICI with median 3.08 months and 13.50 months, respectively, versus 15.57 months and not reached for NLR < 3 (adjusted p-values =0.003 and 0.025, respectively). Prior anti-VEGF therapy <6 months was predictive of increased likelihood of benefit from ICI therapies (adjusted p = 0.028). The median PFS was 3.72 months and 14.33 months, respectively, in cases with prior anti-VEGF therapy for ≥6 months and <6 months., Conclusion: Pretherapy NLR <3 and duration of prior anti-VEGF therapy of <6 months, are independent statistically significant predictors of longer PFS and OS with ICI therapy in mRCC. Validation is required in a larger sample size with multi-institutional collaboration.

The treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults remains challenging and novel therapies are needed. The antigen, CD19, is expressed by >90% of pre-B ALLs and represents an attractive therapeutic target. The bispecific T-cell-engaging antibody, blinatumomab, targets CD19 and has demonstrated encouraging results in minimal residual disease positive and relapsed/refractory pre-B ALL. In this review, we discuss in detail the mechanism of action and key pharmacologic aspects of blinatumomab. In addition, the preclinical studies, clinical studies and toxicities are summarized.