Search

Objectives Periodontitis in pregnancy represents a significant, but often overlooked challenge due to its association to adverse pregnancy (preeclampsia and gestational diabetes) and birth related outcomes (preterm birth and low birth weight). The overall study aim was to identify, organize, and prioritize barriers influencing dental visits among Danish pregnant women not seeing a dentist on a regularly basis. Materials and methods Participants were pregnant women screened at weeks 11–13 of gestation, and were recruited if they were not seeing a dentist regularly. The study was conducted at Holbæk and Nykøbing Falster Hospital in Region Zealand, Denmark. The Group Concept Mapping (GCM) approach was applied. The pregnant women participated in brainstorming (n = 18), sorting (n = 20), and rating (n = 17) the seating question ‘Thinking as broadly as you can, please list all barriers of importance to you for not seeing a dentist on a regular basis’. Results A total of 38 unique barriers were identified, organized, and prioritized online. The multidimensional scaling analysis involved 10 iterations and revealed a low stress value of 0.21. A cluster solution with five clusters including ‘economic reasons’, ‘lack of priority’, ‘lack of time and energy’, ‘no problems with teeth’, and ‘dental fear’, was discussed and interpreted at a validation meeting. Conclusions Five overall clusters explaining barriers for not seeing a dentist regularly were revealed. Of the five clusters, ‘economic reasons’ and ‘lack of priority’ were rated as the most important clusters. Accordingly, such barriers should be considered in the planning of future strategies of dental care during pregnanc, Objectives: Periodontitis in pregnancy represents a significant, but often overlooked challenge due to its association to adverse pregnancy (preeclampsia and gestational diabetes) and birth related outcomes (preterm birth and low birth weight). The overall study aim was to identify, organize, and prioritize barriers influencing dental visits among Danish pregnant women not seeing a dentist on a regularly basis. Materials and methods: Participants were pregnant women screened at weeks 11–13 of gestation, and were recruited if they were not seeing a dentist regularly. The study was conducted at Holbæk and Nykøbing Falster Hospital in Region Zealand, Denmark. The Group Concept Mapping (GCM) approach was applied. The pregnant women participated in brainstorming (n = 18), sorting (n = 20), and rating (n = 17) the seating question ‘Thinking as broadly as you can, please list all barriers of importance to you for not seeing a dentist on a regular basis’. Results: A total of 38 unique barriers were identified, organized, and prioritized online. The multidimensional scaling analysis involved 10 iterations and revealed a low stress value of 0.21. A cluster solution with five clusters including ‘economic reasons’, ‘lack of priority’, ‘lack of time and energy’, ‘no problems with teeth’, and ‘dental fear’, was discussed and interpreted at a validation meeting. Conclusions: Five overall clusters explaining barriers for not seeing a dentist regularly were revealed. Of the five clusters, ‘economic reasons’ and ‘lack of priority’ were rated as the most important clusters. Accordingly, such barriers should be considered in the planning of future strategies of dental care during pregnancy.

To investigate the effect of a probiotic supplement on the severity of aphthous lesions in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) over a 3-month period. A second endpoint was to study the effect on pain related to the lesions. The study employed a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled design with two parallel arms. Twenty patients with minor and major RAS were consecutively enrolled and randomly assigned to the test or the control group. The intervention consisted of lozenges containing two strains of Lactobacillus reuteri taken twice daily for 90 days. Ulcer Severity Score (USS) consisting of six lesion characteristics (number, size, duration, ulcer-free period, site, and pain) was calculated at baseline and after the intervention. Oral pain related to the lesions was estimated by the patients with a Visual Analogue Pain Scale. An improvement of the USS, as well as oral pain, was evident in both groups after 90 days but the reduction was only statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with baseline in the test group. There were no significant differences between the groups, neither at baseline nor at follow-up. No side effects were recorded. Daily supplements with L. reuteri reduced the severity of aphthous lesions over a 90-day period but the improvement was not significantly better than placebo. The results encourage further research and provide a basis for power calculations of larger and extended studies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02976922.