Search

Introduction: Florida's medical cannabis (marijuana) program is among the largest in the United States. Smokable cannabis forms were not legally available in this program until 2019, and five years after other forms of cannabis were available. This study assessed changes in Δ-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) dispensed per patient following legalization of smokable cannabis in Florida. Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study used data from the Florida Department of Health Office of Medical Marijuana Use Reports on THC dispensing from April 6, 2018, through March 13, 2020. Certified medical cannabis user during the study period was included. The exposure was the dispensed amount of THC from legalized smokable forms of medical cannabis (statute identified as SB182), effective as of March 2019. Changes in level and trend of average milligram (mg) of dispensed THC per certified patient with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), before and after SB182, were calculated by fitting a generalized least squares linear model and allowing a 17-week phase-in period. Results: The number of certified patients increased by 24.8% from 197,107 (March 22, 2019) to 246,079 (July 19, 2019) and to 325,868 by March 13, 2020. Assuming that a 20% THC concentration in smokable products, there was a significant level increase in the mean weekly dispensed THC amount per certified patient of 138.45 mg (95% CI: 102.69-174.20), translating to a 42.18% increase (95% CI: 33.14-50.28), from the pre-policy period. We noted a continuous increase of 5.62 mg per certified patient per week (95% CI: 4.35-6.89) throughout the 35 weeks following the policy, when compared with the period before. Assuming 10% THC concentration in smokable products, we observed a significant level increase of 35.10 mg (95% CI: 5.31-64.88), corresponding to an increase of 10.70% (95% CI: 1.70-18.89), and a trend increase of 2.23 mg per certified patient per week (95% CI: 1.18-3.29). Discussion: The expansion of the Florida medical cannabis program to include smokable cannabis forms was associated with a significant increase in the mean amount of weekly dispensed THC per certified patient. Findings suggest that the dispensed amount of THC after legalization of smokable medical cannabis far exceeds the maximum recommended daily dose, based on extrapolation from oral cannabis product dosing recommendations from one expert consensus statement, raising questions about the safety, and need for consumer education.

Purpose: Studies have shown that financial toxicity can reduce survival, decrease quality of life, and reduce compliance with treatments. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate material markers of financial toxicity, including insurance coverage, financial assistance, and balances due among adolescent and young adult (AYA) (18-39), adult (40-64), and senior adult (>65) patients with a sarcoma diagnosis after the Affordable Care Act became effective. Methods: This study performed a retrospective analysis of possible indicators within the material domain of financial toxicity in sarcoma patients, a common diagnosis in young adult patients. Indicators of financial toxicity included: insurance status and number of insurances, charity care, accessing financing options, or having an unpaid balance referred to a collection's agency. Results: The cumulative charges per patient were similar between AYA, adult, and senior adult populations at an average of $194,329 (standard deviation [SD] = $321,425), $236,724 (SD = $368,345), and $188,030 (SD = $271,191), respectively. AYA patients were more likely than adult and senior adult patients to have Medicaid coverage (income-based government insurance) (22.1% vs. 8.4% vs. 1.2%), receive charity care (5.3% vs. 2.6% vs. 1.2%), or have a balance referred to a collection's agency (9.2% vs. 5.8% vs. 1.2%). Conclusions: This study suggests that younger cancer patients are more likely to suffer material financial strain and additional financial resources may need to be made available to ensure they can receive care without an increase of financial toxicity markers and undue financial stress.

Aims: To gain a deeper understanding of nurses and midwives' experiences following involvement in a critical incident in a non-critical care area and to explore how they have 'moved-on' from the event., Design: An interpretive descriptive design guided inductive inquiry to interpret the meaning of moving-on., Methods: Purposive sampling recruited 10 nurses and midwives. Data collection comprised semi-structured interviews, memos and field notes. Data were concurrently collected and analysed during 2016-2017 with NVivo 11. The thematic analysis enabled a coherent analytical framework evolving emerging themes and transformation of the data into credible interpretive description findings, adhering to the COREQ reporting guidelines., Results: The findings revealed five main themes: Initial emotional and physical response, the aftermath, long-lasting repercussions, workplace support and moving-on., Conclusion: This study shed light on the perceptions of nurses and midwives who lived through the impact of critical incidents. Through their lens, the strategies engaged in to move-on were identified and their call for organizational and collegial support received a voice., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: To synthesise the existing literature, which focuses on the impact of critical incidents on nurses and midwives, and to explore their experiences related to the support they received in the current healthcare environment to move on from the event., Design: Systematic review and qualitative synthesis., Data Sources: The electronic databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase and Nursing and Allied Health (ProQuest) were systematically searched from 2013-2018, and core authors and journals identified in the literature were manually investigated., Review Methods: Qualitative studies of all research design types written in English were included according to the PRISMA reporting guidelines. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research., Results: A total of 7,520 potential publications were identified. After removal of duplicate citations, study selection and appraisal process, 11 qualitative primary research papers progressed to the meta-synthesis by meta-aggregation. The 179 findings and sub-findings from the included studies were extracted, combined and synthesised into three statements addressing three different aspects within the context of critical incidents: the experiences of the impact, the perceptions of support and the ability to move on., Conclusion: This review illuminated that moving-on after critical incidents is a complex and wearisome journey for nurses and midwives. More attention should to be drawn to second victims within general nursing and midwifery practice to strengthen their ability to navigate the aftermath of critical incidents and reclaim the professional confidence indispensable to remain in the workforce., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)