Search

Background: Advances in regional anesthesia and pain management led to the advent of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks, which represent a new and promising route for the administration of local anesthetics. Both practical and theoretical knowledge of locoregional anesthesia are therefore becoming fundamental, requiring specific training programs for residents. Simulation-based medical education and training (SBET) has been recently applied to ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) with remarkable results. With this in mind, the anesthesia and intensive care residency program of the University of Milano-Bicocca organized a 4-h regional anesthesia training workshop with the BlockSim® (Accurate Srl, Cesena) simulator. Our study aimed to measure the residents' improvement in terms of reduction in time required to achieve an erector spinae plane (ESP) block. Methods: Fifty-two first-year anesthesia residents were exposed to a 4-h training workshop focused on peripheral blocks. The course included an introductory theoretical session held by a locoregional anesthetist expert, a practical training on human models and mannequins using Onvision® (B. Braun, Milano) technologies, and two test performances on the BlockSim simulator. Residents were asked to perform two ESP blocks on the BlockSim: the first without previous practice on the simulator, the second at the end of the course. Trainees were also also asked to complete a self-assessment questionnaire. Results: The time needed to achieve the block during the second attempt was significantly shorter (131 [83, 198] vs. 68 [27, 91] s, p < 0.001). We also observed a reduction in the number of needle insertions from 3 [2, 7] to 2 [1, 4] (p = 0.002), and an improvement aiming correctly at the ESP from 30 (58%) to 46 (88%) (p < 0.001). Forty-nine (94%) of the residents reported to have improved their regional anesthesia knowledge, 38 (73%) perceived an improvement in their technical skills and 46 (88%) of the tra

The introduction of synthetic opioids in clinical practice played a major role in the history of anesthesiology. For years, anesthesiologists have been thinking that opioids are needed for intraoperative anesthesia. However, we now know that opioids (especially synthetic short-acting molecules) are definitely not ideal analgesics and may even be counterproductive, increasing postoperative pain. As well, opioids have revealed important drawbacks associated to poor perioperative outcomes. As a matter of fact, efforts in postoperative pain management in the last 30 years were driven by the idea of reducing/eliminating opioids from the postoperative period. However, a modern concept of anesthesia should eliminate opioids already intra-operatively towards a balanced, opioid-free approach (opioid-free anesthesia - OFA). In OFA drugs and techniques historically proven for their efficacy are combined in rational and defined protocols. They include ketamine, alpha-2 agonists, lidocaine, magnesium, anti-inflammatory drugs and regional anesthesia. Promising results have been obtained on perioperative outcome. For sure, analgesia is not reduced with OFA, but it is effective and with less opioid-related side effects. These benefits may be of particular importance in some high-risk patients, like OSAS, obese and chronic opioid-users/abusers. OFA may also increase patient-reported outcomes; despite it is difficult to specifically rule out the effect of intraoperative opioids. Finally, few data are available on long-term outcomes (persistent pain and opioid abuse, cancer outcome). New studies and data are required to elaborate the optimal approach for each patient/surgery, but interest and publication are increasing and may open the road to the wider adoption of OFA.

Simona De Gregori,1 Manuela De Gregori,1–4 Nora Bloise,5,6 Dario Bugada,3,4,7 Mariadelfina Molinaro,1 Claudia Filisetti,8 Massimo Allegri,3,9 Michael E Schatman,3,10,11 Lorenzo Cobianchi12,13 1Clinical and Experimental Pharmacokinetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; 2Pain Therapy Service, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; 3Study in Multidisciplinary Pain Research Group, Parma, Italy; 4Young Against Pain Group, Parma, Italy; 5Department of Molecular Medicine, Centre for Health Technologies, INSTM UdR of Pavia, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 6Department of Occupational Medicine, Toxicology and Environmental Risks, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS, Lab of Nanotechnology, Pavia, Italy; 7Emergency and Intensive Care Department – ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; 8“V. Buzzi” Children Hospital, Pediatric Surgery, Milan, Italy; 9Anesthesia and Intensive Care Service, IRCCS MultiMedica Hospital, Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy; 10Research and Network Development, Boston Pain Care, Waltham, MA, USA; 11Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; 12General Surgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; 13Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy Background: The pharmacokinetic properties and clinical advantages of the local anesthetic chloroprocaine are well known. Here, we studied the pharmacokinetic profile of a new hydrogel device loaded with chloroprocaine to investigate the potential advantages of this new strategy for postoperative pain (POP) relief. Materials and methods: We performed both in vitro and in vivo analyses by considering plasma samples of four piglets receiving slow-release chloroprocaine. To quantify chloroprocaine and its inactive metabolite 4-amino-2-chlorobenzoic acid (ACBA), a HPLC&ndash

Giada Amodeo,1 Dario Bugada,2–4 Silvia Franchi,1 Giorgia Moschetti,1 Stefania Grimaldi,5 Alberto Panerai,1 Massimo Allegri,2 Paola Sacerdote1 1Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milano, Milano, Italy; 2Study In Multidisciplinary Pain Research Group, 3Department of Anesthesia and ICU, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; 4Department of Anesthesia and ICU, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; 5Department of Anesthesia, IRCCS Humanitas Research Center, Rozzano, Italy Introduction: Impaired immune function during the perioperative period may be associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes. Morphine is considered a major contributor to immune modulation. Patients and methods: We performed a pilot study to investigate postoperative immune function by analyzing peripheral blood mononuclear cells’ functionality and cytokine production in 16 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. All patients were treated with intravenous (i.v.) patient-controlled analgesia with morphine and continuous wound infusion with ropivacaine+methylprednisolone for 24 hours. After 24 hours, patients were randomized into two groups, one continuing intrawound infusion and the other receiving only i.v. analgesia. We evaluated lymphoproliferation and cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells at the end of surgery and at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Results: A significant reduction in TNF-α, IL-2, IFN-γ and lymphoproliferation was observed immediately after surgery, indicating impaired cell-mediated immunity. TNF-α and IFN-γ remained suppressed up to 48 hours after surgery, while a trend to normalization was observed for IL-2 and lymphoproliferation, irrespective of the treatment group. A significant inverse correlation was present between age and morphine and between age and lymphoproliferation. No negative correlation

Massimo Allegri,1,2 Dario Bugada,1–3 Manuela De Gregori,2,4 Maria A Avanzini,5 Annalisa De Silvestri,6 Anna Petroni,7 Angelo Sala,7,8 Claudia Filisetti,9–11 Antonia Icaro Cornaglia,12 Lorenzo Cobianchi13,14 1Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma 2SIMPAR Group (Study in Multidisciplinary PAin Research), 3Department of Anaesthesia and ICU, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, 4Pain Therapy Service, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 5Laboratory of Transplant Immunology/Cell Factory, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, 6Clinical epidemiology and Biometrics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, 7Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, 8I.B.I.M., C.N.R., Palermo, 9PhD School, University of Pavia, 10Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, 11Department of Pediatric Surgery, “V. Buzzi” Children’s Hospital, Milan, 12Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 13Department of Surgical, Clinical, Paediatric and Diagnostic Science, University of Pavia, 14General Surgery 1, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy Abstract: Continuous wound infusion (CWI) may protect from inflammation, hyperalgesia and persistent pain. Current local anesthetics display suboptimal pharmacokinetic profile during CWI; chloroprocaine (CP) has ideal characteristics, but has never been tested for CWI. We performed an animal study to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile and anti-inflammatory effect of CP during CWI. A total of 14 piglets received an infusion catheter after pararectal laparotomy and were randomly allocated to one of three groups: 5 mL/h infusion of saline (group A), CP 1.5% (group B) and CP 0.5% (group C). Blood sampling was performed to assess absorption and systemic inflammation at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 102 and 108 hours