Search

We address the question of the infinitude of twin and cousin prime pairs from a probabilistic perspective. Our approach partitions the set of integer numbers greater than $2$ in finite intervals of the form $[p_{n-1}^2,p_n^2)$, $p_{n-1}$ and $p_n$ being two consecutive primes, and evaluates the probability $q_n$ that such an interval contains a twin prime and a cousin prime. Combining Merten's third theorem with the properties of the binomial distribution, we show that $q_n$ approaches $1$ as $n \to \infty$. A study of the convergence properties of the sequence $\{q_n\}$ allows us to propose a new, more stringent conjecture concerning the existence of infinitely many twin and cousin primes. In accord with the Hardy-Littlewood conjecture, it is also shown that twin and cousin primes share the same asymptotic distribution., Comment: 20 pages, 4 figures

Among professionals and academics alike, it is well known that active portfolio management is unable to provide additional risk-adjusted returns relative to their benchmarks. For this reason, passive wealth management has emerged in recent decades to offer returns close to benchmarks at a lower cost. In this article, we first refine the existing results on the theoretical properties of oblique Brownian motion. Then, assuming that the returns follow skew geometric Brownian motions and that they are correlated, we describe some statistical properties for the \emph{ex-post}, the \emph{ex-ante} tracking errors, and the forecasted tracking portfolio. To this end, we develop an innovative statistical methodology, based on a benchmark-asset principal component factorization, to determine a tracking portfolio that replicates the performance of a benchmark by investing in a subset of the investable universe. This strategy, named hybrid Principal Component Analysis (hPCA), is applied both on normal and skew distributions. In the case of skew-normal returns, we propose a framework for calibrating the model parameters, based on the maximum likelihood estimation method. For testing and validation, we compare four alternative models for index tracking. The first two are based on the hPCA when returns are assumed to be normal or skew-normal. The third model adopts a standard optimization-based approach and the last one is used in the financial sector by some practitioners. For validation and testing, we present a thorough comparison of these strategies on real-world data, both in terms of performance and computational efficiency. A noticeable result is that, not only, the suggested lean PCA-based portfolio selection approach compares well versus cumbersome algorithms for optimization-based portfolios, but, also, it could provide a better service to the asset management industry.