Search

Aims: qPCR, is widely used for quantifying minimal residual disease (MRD) and is conventionally performed according to guidelines proposed by the EuroMRD consortium. However it often fails when quantifying MRD levels below 10-4. By contrast, HAT-PCR, a recent modification designed to minimise false-positive results, can quantify MRD down to 10-6., Methods: The factors leading to failure of conventional qPCR to quantify low levels of MRD were studied by analysing PCR reagents, protocol and primers and by testing for inhibition by adding primers to a plasmid amplification system. Complementary primers, ending in either G/C or A/T, were used to determine the effect of the 3' end of a primer., Results: Inhibition of conventional PCR resulted from interaction of primers with genomic DNA leading to exponential amplification of nonspecific amplicons. It was observed with approximately half of the EuroMRD J primers tested. Inhibition by a primer was significantly related to primer Tm and G/C content and was absent when extension at the 3' end was blocked. Nonspecificity and inhibition were decreased or abolished by increasing the annealing temperature and inhibition was decreased by increasing the concentration of polymerase. Primers terminating with G/C produced significantly more nonspecificity and inhibition than primers terminating with A/T. HAT-PCR produced minimal nonspecificity and no inhibition., Conclusions: Inhibition of the PCR may result from the presence of genomic DNA and resultant exponential amplification of nonspecific amplicons. Factors contributing to the phenomenon include suboptimal annealing temperature, suboptimal primer design, and suboptimal polymerase concentration. Optimisation of these factors, as in HAT-PCR, enables sensitive quantification of MRD. PCR assays are increasingly used for sensitive detection of other rare targets against a background of genomic DNA and such assays may benefit from similar improvement in PCR design., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interest: Monoquant Pty Ltd (http://monoquant.com.au/) provided research support (grant #30485) to AA Morley and Flinders University which included the salaries of SL, EH and BB. It holds US patent 11306352 in relation to HAT-PCR. AAM, SL, EH and BB hold equity in Monoquant., (Copyright: © 2023 Latham et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

PCR is widely used to measure minimal residual disease (MRD) in lymphoid neoplasms, but its sensitivity is limited. High Adenine/Thymine PCR and High Annealing Temperature PCR (HAT-PCR) is a modified PCR designed to minimize nonspecificity and hence increase sensitivity. It was evaluated in the laboratory and the clinic, using samples from 58 patients. Of these patients, 57 were adolescents or young adults who were participating in the Australasian Leukemia and Lymphoma Group ALL06 trial in which MRD was measured in blood principally by HAT-PCR and in marrow by conventional PCR. HAT-PCR produced significantly less nonspecificity than conventional PCR, and its limit of detection was <10 -6 in 90% of patients. In 196 samples, an excellent correlation was found between blood and marrow MRD. Variable partitioning of leukemic cells between blood and marrow was observed. Measurement of MRD in blood by HAT-PCR was noninferior to measurement of MRD in marrow by conventional PCR, in terms of both detecting disease and predicting clinical outcome. At a median follow-up of 3 years and for MRD levels in blood at the end of consolidation treatment, an MRD level of >10 -4 cells/L significantly predicted relapse and mortality, whereas undetectable MRD significantly predicted relapse-free survival and overall survival. HAT-PCR is a simple, quick, cheap and sensitive method for measurement of MRD, and its adoption for MRD in blood may be clinically useful., (Copyright © 2022 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The widespread use of PCR to quantify minimal residual disease has been hampered by the apparently wide variation in amplification efficiency (AE) of PCR primers. A new method to measure AE was developed on the basis of the Ct results of PCR amplification of single copies of a target molecule placed by limiting dilution into wells of a microplate. The mean one copy Ct of a population of primers or of a reference primer was calibrated against the AE determined by the standard method of regression analysis. The AE of a test primer could then be determined by relating its one copy Ct value to the calibrated mean one copy Ct value. This new method was much more precise than direct determination of AE by regression analysis. The AE of minimal residual disease primers, and of primers for eight other genes, was determined to be >95% and often close to 100%. A primer/plasmid standard was produced to enable transfer of the method to other laboratories. The one copy Ct method thus enables AE of a patient-specific primer to be simply and accurately determined., (Copyright © 2021 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The level of minimal residual disease (MRD) in marrow predicts outcome and guides treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) but accurate prediction depends on accurate measurement., Methods: Forty-one children with ALL were studied at the end of induction. Two samples were obtained from each iliac spine and each sample was assayed twice. Assay, sample and side-to-side variation were quantified by analysis of variance and presumptively incorrect decisions related to high-risk disease were determined using the result from each MRD assay, the mean MRD in the patient as the measure of the true value, and each of 3 different MRD cut-off levels which have been used for making decisions on treatment., Results: Variation between assays, samples and sides each differed significantly from zero and the overall standard deviation for a single MRD estimation was 0.60 logs. Multifocal residual disease seemed to be at least partly responsible for the variation between samples. Decision errors occurred at a frequency of 13-14% when the mean patient MRD was between 10-2 and 10-5. Decision errors were observed only for an MRD result within 1 log of the cut-off value used for assessing high risk. Depending on the cut-off used, 31-40% of MRD results were within 1 log of the cut-off value and 21-16% of such results would have resulted in a decision error., Conclusion: When the result obtained for the level of MRD is within 1 log of the cut-off value used for making decisions, variation in the assay and/or sampling may result in a misleading assessment of the true level of marrow MRD. This may lead to an incorrect decision on treatment.

Aims: RT-qPCR is used to quantify minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in order to make decisions on treatment, but its results depend on the level of BCR-ABL1 expression as well as leukaemic cell number. The aims of the study were to quantify inter-individual differences in expression level, to determine the relationship between expression level and response to treatment, and to investigate the effect of expression level on interpretation of the RT-qPCR result., Methods: BCR-ABL1 expression was studied in 248 samples from 65 patients with CML by determining the difference between MRD quantified by RT-qPCR and DNA-qPCR. The results were analysed statistically and by simple indicative modelling., Results: Inter-individual levels of expression approximated a normal distribution with an SD of 0.36 log. Expression at diagnosis correlated with expression during treatment. Response to treatment, as measured by the number of leukaemic cells after 3, 6 or 12 months of treatment, was not related to the level of expression. Indicative modelling suggested that interpretation of RT-qPCR results in relation to treatment guidelines could be affected by variation in expression when MRD was around 10% at 3 months and by both expression variation and Poisson variation when MRD was around or below the limit of detection of RT-qPCR., Conclusions: Variation between individuals in expression of BCR-ABL1 can materially affect interpretation of the RT-qPCR when this test is used to make decisions on treatment., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/)

The BCR-ABL1 sequence has advantages over the BCR-ABL1 transcript as a molecular marker in chronic myeloid leukemia and has been used in research studies. We developed a DNA real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) method for quantification of BCR-ABL1 sequences, which is also potentially suitable for routine use. The BCR-ABL1 breakpoint was sequenced after isolation by nested short-range PCR of DNA from blood, marrow, and cells on slides, obtained either at diagnosis or during treatment, or from artificial mixtures. PCR primers were chosen from a library of presynthesized and pretested BCR (n = 19) and ABL1 (n = 568) primers. BCR-ABL1 sequences were quantified relative to BCR sequences in 521 assays on 266 samples from 92 patients. For minimal residual disease detectable by DNA qPCR and RT-qPCR, DNA qPCR gave similar minimal residual disease results as RT-qPCR but had better precision at low minimal residual disease levels. The limit of detection of DNA qPCR depended on the amount of DNA assayed, being 10(-5.8) when 5 μg was assayed and 10(-7.0) when 80 μg was assayed. DNA qPCR may be useful and practical for monitoring the increasing number of patients with minimal residual disease around or below the limit of detection of RT-qPCR as the assay itself is simple and the up-front costs will be amortized if sequential assays are performed., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Molecular markers for minimal residual disease in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia were identified by determining, at the time of diagnosis, the repertoire of rearrangements of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene using segment-specific variable (V), diversity (D), and junctional (J) primers in two different studies that involved a total study population of 75 children and 18 adults. This strategy, termed repertoire analysis, was compared with the conventional strategy of identifying markers using family-specific V, D, and J primers for a variety of antigen receptor genes. Repertoire analysis detected significantly more markers for the major leukemic clone than did the conventional strategy, and one or more IgH rearrangements that were suitable for monitoring the major clone were detected in 96% of children and 94% of adults. Repertoire analysis also detected significantly more IGH markers for minor clones. Some minor clones were quite large and a proportion of them would not be able to be detected by a minimal residual disease test directed to the marker for the major clone. IGH repertoire analysis at diagnosis has potential advantages for the identification of molecular markers for the quantification of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases. An IGH marker enables very sensitive quantification of the major leukemic clone, and the detection of minor clones may enable early identification of additional patients who are prone to relapse.

A sensitive and specific quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction method, involving three rounds of amplification with two allele-specific oligonucleotide primers directed against an rearrangement, was developed to quantify minimal residual disease (MRD) in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). For a single sample containing 10 microg of good quality DNA, MRD was quantifiable down to approximately 10(-6), which is at least 1 log more sensitive than current methods. Nonspecific amplification was rarely observed. The standard deviation of laboratory estimations was 0.32 log units at moderate or high levels of MRD, but increased markedly as the level of MRD and the number of intact marker gene rearrangements in the sample fell. In 23 children with ALL studied after induction therapy, the mean MRD level was 1.6 x 10(-5) and levels ranged from 1.5 x 10(-2) to less than 10(-7). Comparisons with the conventional one-round quantitative polymerase chain reaction method on 29 samples from another 24 children who received treatment resulted in concordant results for 22 samples and discordant results for seven samples. The sensitivity and specificity of the method are due to the use of nested polymerase chain reaction, one segment-specific and two allele-specific oligonucleotide primers, and the use of a large amount of good quality DNA. This method may improve MRD-based decisions on treatment for ALL patients, and the principles should be applicable to DNA-based MRD measurements in other disorders.