Search

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of disability in the US. Angiotensin 1-7 (Ang-1-7), an endogenous peptide, acts at the G protein coupled MAS1 receptors (MASR) to inhibit inflammatory mediators and decrease reactive oxygen species within the CNS. Few studies have identified whether Ang-(1-7) decreases cognitive impairment following closed TBI. This study examined the therapeutic effect of Ang-(1-7) on secondary injury observed in a murine model of mild TBI (mTBI) in a closed skull, single injury model., Materials and Methods: Male mice ( n = 108) underwent a closed skull, controlled cortical impact injury. Two hours after injury, mice were administered either Ang-(1-7) ( n = 12) or vehicle ( n = 12), continuing through day 5 post-TBI, and tested for cognitive impairment on days 1-5 and 18. pTau, Tau, GFAP, and serum cytokines were measured at multiple time points. Animals were observed daily for cognition and motor coordination via novel object recognition. Brain sections were stained and evaluated for neuronal injury., Results: Administration of Ang-(1-7) daily for 5 days post-mTBI significantly increased cognitive function as compared to saline control-treated animals. Cortical and hippocampal structures showed less damage in the presence of Ang-(1-7), while Ang-(1-7) administration significantly changed the expression of pTau and GFAP in cortical and hippocampal regions as compared to control., Discussion: These are among the first studies to demonstrate that sustained administration of Ang-(1-7) following a closed-skull, single impact mTBI significantly improves neurologic outcomes, potentially offering a novel therapeutic modality for the prevention of long-term CNS impairment following such injuries., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Bruhns, Sulaiman, Gaub, Bae, Davidson Knapp, Larson, Smith, Coleman, Staatz, Sandweiss, Joseph, Hay, Largent-Milnes and Vanderah.)

Background Findings of both case control and in vitro investigations suggest that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may play a beneficial role in the occurrence, growth, and subsistence of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) brain tumor in humans. Objective In the present retrospective cohort study, we assessed the impact of NSAID use on survival in patients diagnosed with and treated for GBM brain tumors. Methods The impact of NSAID use and six other potential prognostic indicators of survival were assessed in 71 patients treated for GBM brain tumors from February 2011 to June 2016. Survival analysis and cross-tabulation analyses were performed to examine the potential relationship between NSAID use and occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage over the course of treatment for GBM. Results Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference in survival between patients with and without NSAID use (p = 0.75; 95% CI: 10.12, 18.13). Multiple Cox regression analysis identified only treatment with chemotherapy as imposing any statistically significant effect on survival (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 3.31; p < 0.001; 95% CI: 1.80, 6.07). Cross-tabulation revealed no significant effect of NSAID use on occurrence of hemorrhage during treatment, X 2 (2, N = 71) = 0.65, p 2-Sided = 0.42, (Fisher's Exact Test: p2-sided = 0.56, p1-sided = 0.31). Conclusion These results suggest that history of NSAID use is not a determinant of survival in GBM patients. More rigorous, prospective investigations of the effect of NSAID use on tumor progression are necessary before the utility of this family of drugs in the treatment of GBM can be adequately appraised., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

The inverted pendulum model predicts that the major challenge for neural control of the upright posture is the inherent instability of the body due to the center of mass (COM) being above the base of support (BOS). If so, even slight elevation of the COM may substantially destabilize posture. The destabilizing effect of heavy load positioned above the COM has been demonstrated. We examined sensitivity of posture to light (1-5% of body weight) load by placing weights on the shoulders and assessing functional reach distance in the forward, right, and left directions and postural sway during quiet stance. At each load level, the quiet stance task was tested with and without vision. The 1% of body weight load significantly shortened reach distance in the forward direction. It also increased postural sway. Interestingly, additional weight did not result in further deficits. The results support high sensitivity of postural stability to COM elevation that increases the challenge for neural control of posture and that can potentially be used for early detection of declines in postural stability.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2015/292805.].

Manual therapy has long been a component of physical rehabilitation programs, especially to treat those in pain. The mechanisms of manual therapy, however, are not fully understood, and it has been suggested that its pain modulatory effects are of neurophysiological origin and may be mediated by the descending modulatory circuit. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to examine the neurophysiological response to different types of manual therapy, in order to better understand the neurophysiological mechanisms behind each therapy's analgesic effects. It is concluded that different forms of manual therapy elicit analgesic effects via different mechanisms, and nearly all therapies appear to be at least partially mediated by descending modulation. Additionally, future avenues of mechanistic research pertaining to manual therapy are discussed.