Search

Background: Although anxiety and depression have been associated with adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure (HF), data on temporal evolution of these symptoms are scarce. We aimed to investigate the association between repeatedly measured depression and anxiety symptoms and clinical outcome in chronic HF patients. Methods: In this prospective observational study, outpatients with chronic HF were included and followed-up for a maximum of 2.5 years. The hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) questionnaire was conducted every six months. The primary endpoint was a composite of HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Cox and joint models were used to investigate the association between the HADS score and the endpoint. Results: A total of 362 patients filled out a median (25th–75th percentile) of 3 [2–4] questionnaires each. Mean ± SD age was 63 ± 13 years, 72% were men. Anxiety scores remained relatively stable leading up to the endpoint, while depression scores increased. Higher baseline depression scores were significantly associated with the endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 1.68 and 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19–2.36 per log(score+1), p = 0.003), while higher baseline anxiety scores did not reach statistical significance (HR [95% CI] 1.34 [0.99–1.83], p = 0.061). When repeatedly measured, both higher anxiety (HR [95% CI] 1.57[1.07–2.30], p = 0.022) and depression (HR [95% CI] 2.04 [1.39–3.06], p < 0.001) scores were significantly associated with the endpoint. Conclusion: Serial measurements of depression and anxiety symptoms identify chronic HF patients with increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Screening for both disorders should be considered in clinical practice.

Aims: Examining the systemic biological processes in the heterogeneous syndrome of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), as reflected by circulating proteins, in relation to echocardiographic characteristics, may provide insights into heart failure pathophysiology. We investigated the link of 4210 repeatedly measured circulating proteins with repeatedly measured echocardiographic parameters as well as with elevated left atrial pressure (LAP), in patients with HFrEF, to provide insights into underlying mechanisms. Methods and results: In 173 patients with HFrEF, we performed 6-monthly echocardiography and trimonthly blood sampling during a median follow-up of 2.7 (inter-quartile range: 2.5-2.8) years. We investigated circulating proteins in relation to echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS)] and left atrial function [left atrial reservoir strain (LASr)] and elevated LAP (E/eʹratio >15) and used gene enrichment analyses to identify underlying pathophysiological processes. We found 723, 249, 792, and 427 repeatedly measured proteins, with significant associations with LVEF, GLS, LASr, and E/eʹratio, respectively. Proteins associated with LASr reflected pathophysiological mechanisms mostly related to the extracellular matrix. Proteins associated with GLS reflected cardiovascular biological processes and diseases, whereas those associated with LVEF reflected processes involved in the sympathetic nervous system. Moreover, 49 proteins were associated with elevated LAP; after correction for LVEF, three proteins remained: cystatin-D, fibulin-5, and HSP40. Conclusion: Circulating proteins show varying associations with different echocardiographic parameters in patients with HFrEF. These findings suggest that pathways involved in atrial and ventricular dysfunction, as reflected by the plasma proteome, are distinct.

Purpose: To study the effects of a perindopril-based regimen on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with vascular disease in relation to background statin therapy. Methods: A pooled analysis of the randomized ADVANCE, EUROPA, and PROGRESS trials was performed to evaluate CV outcomes in 29,463 patients with vascular disease treated with perindopril-based regimens versus placebo. The primary endpoint was a composite of CV mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of a perindopril-based regimen versus placebo in relation to statin use. Results: At randomization, 39.5% of the overall combined study population used statins. After a mean follow-up of 4.0 years (SD 1.0), the cumulative event-free survival was highest in the statin/perindopril group and lowest in the no statin/placebo group (91.2% vs. 85.6%, respectively, log-rank p < 0.001). In statin users (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–0.98) and non-statin users (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74–0.87), a perindopril-based regimen was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary endpoint when compared to placebo. The additional treatment effect appeared numerically greater in non-statin users, but the observed difference was statistically nonsignificant. Conclusion: Our data suggest that the treatment benefits of a perindopril-based regimen in patients with vascular disease are independent of statin use.

Objective: To develop a prediction model for the development of hypertension in the decade following pre-eclampsia in women who were normotensive shortly after pregnancy. Methods: This was a longitudinal cohort study of formerly pre-eclamptic women attending a university hospital in The Netherlands between 1996 and 2019. We developed a prediction model for incident hypertension using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The model was validated internally using bootstrapping techniques. Results: Of 259 women, 185 (71%) were normotensive at the first cardiovascular assessment, at a median of 10 (interquartile range (IQR), 6–24) months after a pre-eclamptic pregnancy, of whom 49 (26%) had developed hypertension by the second visit, at a median of 11 (IQR, 6–14) years postpartum. The prediction model, based on birth-weight centile, mean arterial pressure, total cholesterol, left ventricular mass index and left ventricular ejection fraction, had good-to-excellent discriminative ability, with an area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75–0.89) and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.80. The sensitivity and specificity of our model to predict hypertension were 98% and 34%, respectively, and positive and negative predictive values were 35% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions: Based on five variables, we developed a good-to-excellent predictive tool to identify incident hypertension following pre-eclampsia in women who were normotensive shortly after pregnancy. After external validation, this model could have considerable clinical utility in tackling the cardiovascular legacy of pre-eclampsia.

Despite treatment advancements, HF mortality remains high, prompting interest in reducing HF-related hospitalizations through remote monitoring. These advances are necessary considering the rapidly rising prevalence and incidence of HF worldwide, presenting a burden on hospital resources. While traditional approaches have failed in predicting impending HF-related hospitalizations, remote hemodynamic monitoring can detect changes in intracardiac filling pressure weeks prior to HF-related hospitalizations which makes timely pharmacological interventions possible. To ensure successful implementation, structural integration, optimal patient selection, and efficient data management are essential. This review aims to provide an overview of the rationale, the available devices, current evidence, and the implementation of remote hemodynamic monitoring.

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: We randomly assigned 50 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and NYHA class ≥ II, in a 1:1 ratio, to either RDN and optimal medical therapy (OMT) or OMT alone. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of a combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, rehospitalisation for heart failure, and acute kidney injury at 6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I‑MIBG) heart-to-mediastinum ratio (HMR) at 6 months. Results: Mean age was 60 ± 9 years, 86% was male and mean LVEF was 33 ± 8%. At 6 months, the primary safety endpoint occurred in 8.3% vs 8.0% in the RDN and OMT groups, respectively (p = 0.97). At 6 months, the mean change in late HMR was −0.02 (95% CI: −0.08 to 0.12) in the RDN group, versus −0.02 (95% CI: −0.09 to 0.12) in the OMT group (p = 0.95) whereas the mean change in washout rate was 2.34 (95% CI: −6.35 to 1.67) in the RDN group versus −2.59 (95% CI: −1.61 to 6.79) in the OMT group (p-value 0.09). Conclusion: RDN with the Vessix system in patients with HFrEF was safe, but did not result in significant changes in cardiac sympathetic nerve activity at 6 months as measured using 123I‑MIBG.

Background: The effects of pharmacological blood-pressure-lowering on cardiovascular outcomes in individuals aged 70 years and older, particularly when blood pressure is not substantially increased, is uncertain. We compared the effects of blood-pressure-lowering treatment on the risk of major cardiovascular events in groups of patients stratified by age and blood pressure at baseline. Methods: We did a meta-analysis using individual participant-level data from randomised controlled trials of pharmacological blood-pressure-lowering versus placebo or other classes of blood-pressure-lowering medications, or between more versus less intensive treatment strategies, which had at least 1000 persons-years of follow-up in each treatment group. Participants with previous history of heart failure were excluded. Data were obtained from the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Triallists' Collaboration. We pooled the data and categorised participants into baseline age groups (<55 years, 55–64 years, 65–74 years, 75–84 years, and ≥85 years) and blood pressure categories (in 10 mm Hg increments from <120 mm Hg to ≥170 mm Hg systolic blood pressure and from <70 mm Hg to ≥110 mm Hg diastolic). We used a fixed effects one-stage approach and applied Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by trial, to analyse the data. The primary outcome was defined as either a composite of fatal or non-fatal stroke, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction or ischaemic heart disease, or heart failure causing death or requiring hospital admission. Findings: We included data from 358 707 participants from 51 randomised clinical trials. The age of participants at randomisation ranged from 21 years to 105 years (median 65 years [IQR 59–75]), with 42 960 (12·0%) participants younger than 55 years, 128 437 (35·8%) aged 55–64 years, 128 506 (35·8%) 65–74 years, 54 016 (15·1%) 75–84 years, and 4788 (1·3%) 85 years and older. The hazard ratios for the risk of major cardiovascular events per 5 mm Hg

Background: Clinical management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) centres on treating comorbidities and is likely to vary between countries. Thus, to provide insight into the current management of HFpEF, studies from multiple countries are required. We evaluated the clinical profiles and current management of patients with HFpEF in the Netherlands. Methods: We included 2153 patients with HFpEF (defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%) from the CHECK-HF registry, which included patients from 2013 to 2016. Results: Median age was 77 (IQR 15) years, 55% were women and the most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (51%), renal insufficiency (45%) and atrial fibrillation (AF, 38%). Patients between 65 and 80 years and those over 80 years had on average more comorbidities (up to 64% and 74%, respectively, with two or more comorbidities) than patients younger than 65 years (38% with two or more comorbidities, p-value < 0.001). Although no specific drugs are available for HFpEF, treating comorbidities is advised. Beta-blockers were most frequently prescribed (78%), followed by loop diuretics (74%), renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (67%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs, 39%). Strongest predictors for loop-diuretic use were older age, higher New York Heart Association class and AF. Conclusion: The medical HFpEF profile is determined by the underlying comorbidities, sex and age. Comorbidities are highly prevalent in HFpEF patients, especially in elderly HFpEF patients. Despite the lack of evidence, many HFpEF patients receive regular beta-blockers, RAS inhibitors and MRAs, often for the treatment of comorbidities.