Search

BackgroundThe incidence of both type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in children and youth is increasing. However, the current approach for identifying pediatric diabetes and separating by type is costly, because it requires substantial manual efforts. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to develop a computable phenotype for accurately and efficiently identifying diabetes and separating T1DM from T2DM in pediatric patients. MethodsThis retrospective study utilized a data set from the University of Florida Health Integrated Data Repository to identify 300 patients aged 18 or younger with T1DM, T2DM, or that were healthy based on a developed computable phenotype. Three endocrinology residents/fellows manually reviewed medical records of all probable cases to validate diabetes status and type. This refined computable phenotype was then used to identify all cases of T1DM and T2DM in the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. ResultsA total of 295 electronic health records were manually reviewed; of these, 128 cases were found to have T1DM, 35 T2DM, and 132 no diagnosis. The positive predictive value was 94.7%, the sensitivity was 96.9%, specificity was 95.8%, and the negative predictive value was 97.6%. Overall, the computable phenotype was found to be an accurate and sensitive method to pinpoint pediatric patients with T1DM. ConclusionsWe developed a computable phenotype for identifying T1DM correctly and efficiently. The computable phenotype that was developed will enable researchers to identify a population accurately and cost-effectively. As such, this will vastly improve the ease of identifying patients for future intervention studies.

The ongoing coronavirus pandemic led to a rapid and dramatic increase in the use of telehealth for diabetes care. In the wake of this transition, we examine new opportunities and ongoing challenges for using telehealth within diabetes management, based on data and experiences from the pre-pandemic and pandemic time frames.

Previously, we demonstrated low-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) immunotherapy preserved C-peptide for 2 years in a pilot study of patients with established type 1 diabetes (n = 25). Here, we evaluated the long-term outcomes of ATG/GCSF in study participants with 5 years of available follow-up data (n = 15). The primary end point was area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide during a 2-h mixed-meal tolerance test. After 5 years, there were no statistically significant differences in AUC C-peptide when comparing those who received ATG/GCSF versus placebo (P = 0.41). A modeling framework based on mean trajectories in C-peptide AUC over 5 years, accounting for differing trends between groups, was applied to recategorize responders (n = 9) and nonresponders (n = 7). ATG/GCSF reponders demonstrated nearly unchanged HbA1c over 5 years (mean [95% CI] adjusted change 0.29% [-0.69%, 1.27%]), but the study was not powered for comparisons against nonresponders 1.75% (-0.57%, 4.06%) or placebo recipients 1.44% (0.21%, 2.66%). These data underscore the importance of long-term follow-up in previous and ongoing phase 2 trials of low-dose ATG in recent-onset type 1 diabetes.

Introduction: The immune-mediated destruction of insulin-producing β-cells characterizes type 1 diabetes. Nevertheless, exocrine pancreatic enzymes, including amylase, lipase, and trypsin, are also significantly reduced in type 1 diabetes. With an immunotherapy now approved to treat early-stage type 1 diabetes, biomarkers to delineate response to treatment are needed. No study has yet evaluated whether serum exocrine pancreatic enzymes could delineate immunotherapy responders and non-responders. Methods: In this novel study, we sought to identify longitudinal trends in the most commonly measured circulating exocrine enzymes before and after treatment with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) in individuals with new-onset type 1 diabetes (n=34). We defined response to immunotherapy as participants with at least 60% of baseline area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide levels after a 2-hour mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) at two years post-treatment. In the overall study (n=89), 42% of treated and 17% of placebo participants met this definition. Due to constraints of sample availability, we compared longitudinal serum amylase, lipase, and trypsin levels in a subset of responders to therapy (n=4-6), placebo "responders" (n=2), treated non-responders (n=16), and placebo non-responders (n=10). Results: There were no differences in amylase levels between groups at baseline or six months post-treatment. Baseline levels of lipase and trypsin tended to be lower in responders; however, these variations were not significant in this small study sample. Lipase and trypsin improved to 115% of baseline in responders to immunotherapy six months after treatment and declined to 80-90% of baseline in non-responders and placebo participants (p=0.03). This difference was not present before the six-month time point. Discussion: Our findings provide preliminary evidence that the exocrine pancreatic enzymes lipase and trypsin may be useful biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in type 1 diabetes. Further studies with larger numbers of participants are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many people with diabetes in the U.S. will seek or currently hold a license to drive. For many, a driver's license is essential for everyday life. Considerable discussion has focused on whether, and the extent to which, diabetes may be a relevant factor in determining driver ability and eligibility for a license. This statement addresses such issues in relation to current scientific and medical evidence. A diagnosis of diabetes on its own is not sufficient to make judgments about an individual driver's ability or safety. This statement provides an overview of existing licensing rules for people with diabetes in the U.S., addresses the factors that affect driving ability, identifies general guidelines for assessing driver fitness and determining appropriately tailored licensing restrictions, and provides practical guidance for health care professionals regarding clinical interventions and education for people with diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Low-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (2.5 mg/kg) preserves C-peptide and reduces HbA1c in new-onset stage 3 type 1 diabetes, yet efficacy in delaying progression from stage 2 to stage 3 has not been evaluated. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Children (n = 6) aged 5–14 years with stage 2 type 1 diabetes received off-label, low-dose ATG. HbA1c, C-peptide, continuous glucose monitoring, insulin requirements, and side effects were followed for 18–48 months. RESULTS: Three subjects (50%) remained diabetes free after 1.5, 3, and 4 years of follow-up, while three developed stage 3 within 1–2 months after therapy. Eighteen months posttreatment, even disease progressors demonstrated near-normal HbA1c (5.1% [32 mmol/mol], 5.6% [38 mmol/mol], and 5.3% [34 mmol/mol]), time in range (93%, 88%, and 98%), low insulin requirements (0.17, 0.18, and 0.34 units/kg/day), and robust C-peptide 90 min after mixed meal (1.3 ng/dL, 2.3 ng/dL, and 1.4 ng/dL). CONCLUSIONS: These observations support additional prospective studies evaluating ATG in stage 2 type 1 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is imperative; however, adherence to screening guidelines is poor. We hypothesized that youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who met American Diabetes Association criteria for recommended DR screening at the time of the study (10 years old or greater with diabetes duration of 5 years or more) would report multiple barriers to screening and that targeted barriers and subpopulations could be identified to improve access to care. 271 youth aged 10 to 26 years with T1D of at least 5 years duration were recruited from clinic, diabetes camp, and a diabetes conference and completed a patient‐reported questionnaire. 113 (41.7%) reported at least one barrier to DR screening, with missed school and work being the most common (20.7%). Older participants (P = 0.007) and those with a longer diabetes duration (P = 0.018) were more likely to report barriers to screening. Recruitment location, sex, race and ethnicity, HbA1c, insulin regimen, and clinic visit frequency were not associated with reporting at least one barrier. Slightly less than two‐thirds (62.1%) of participants who responded (n = 235 out of 271) adhered to recommended screening guidelines of the time and reported having an eye exam within the past year, 24.7% 12–23 months ago, 9.8% 2 years ago or more, and 3.4% had never had a DR exam. As older patients and those with longer duration of diabetes are more likely to have DR, targeted interventions to address barriers to care, such as, missed school and work should be implemented in these groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE | To assess the use of a portable retinal camera in diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening in multiple settings and the presence of associated risk factors among children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes. DESIGN AND METHODS | Five hundred youth with type 1 diabetes of at least 1 year's duration were recruited from clinics, diabetes camp, and a diabetes conference and underwent retinal imaging using a nonmydriatic fundus camera. Retinal characterization was performed remotely by a licensed ophthalmologist. Risk factors for DR development were evaluated by a patient-reported questionnaire and medical chart review. RESULTS | Of the 500 recruited subjects aged 9-26 years (mean 14.9, SD 3.8), 10 cases of DR were identified (nine mild and one moderate nonproliferative DR) with 100% of images of gradable quality. The prevalence of DR was 2.04% (95% CI 0.78-3.29), at an average age of 20.2 years, with the youngest affected subject being 17.1 years of age. The rate of DR was higher, at 6.5%, with diabetes duration .10 years (95% CI 0.86-12.12, P = 0.0002). In subjects with DR, the average duration of diabetes was 12.1 years (SD 4.6, range 6.2-20.0), and in a subgroup of clinic-only subjects (n = 114), elevated blood pressure in the year before screening was associated with DR (P = 0.0068). CONCLUSION | This study in a large cohort of subjects with type 1 diabetes demonstrates that older adolescents and young adults (.17 years) with longer disease duration (.6 years) are at risk for DR development, and screening using a portable retinal camera is feasible in clinics and other locations. Recent elevated blood pressure was a risk factor in an analyzed subgroup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pronounced health disparities exist in type 1 diabetes (T1D) based on socioeconomic status (SES) yet there are a lack of programs designed to promote health equity for vulnerable communities. The All for ONE (Outreach, Networks, and Education) mentoring program was piloted pairing college students and publicly insured teenagers with T1D to assess feasibility as a possible intervention. There were 22 mentors recruited (mean age 20 ± 2 years; 17 [77%] females; mean HbA1c 8.4 ± 1.5%) and matched with mentees based on gender. There were 42 teens randomized to treatment and control groups including 22 teens in the treatment group (age 14 ± 2 years; 17 [77%] females; HbA1c 9.8 ± 2.3%) and 20 teens in the control group (age 14 ± 2 years; 15 [75%] females; HbA1c 8.9 ± 2.0%) followed over 9 months. Outcome measures included HbA1c and the Children's Hope Scale. The intervention included automated text reminders for blood glucose monitoring, text exchanges, social events with education, and clinic visits with mentors/mentees. Mean change in HbA1c for teens was +0.09% in the intervention group, compared with +0.28% in the control group (P =.61); college students had a reduction in HbA1c of −0.22% (P =.38). Treatment group teens had marked improvement in their hope for the future compared to control group teens (P =.04) and were more likely to attend clinic visits (P =.02). This program established feasibility for a model that could be replicated and modified for other types of settings. Additional research is warranted to study the potential long‐term benefits of participating in the All for ONE mentoring program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to well-designed studies of birth cohorts and at-risk individuals, our understanding of the natural history of pre- and early type 1 diabetes (T1D) has advanced considerably over the past decade. Genetic risk scores can predict with increasing precision and accuracy who is at risk for T1D, and early staging based upon islet autoantibody status allows for improved mechanistic and natural history studies as well as improved clinical trial design. A growing number of children are being diagnosed with islet autoimmunity prior to the onset of symptoms, and confusion remains surrounding their proper management. These patients should have access to appropriate counseling and should be referred to a center that can provide information regarding current prevention trials. In the future, a successful prevention strategy for T1D would justify population-based screening for all children., (Copyright© of YS Medical Media ltd.)